The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - August 07, 2026


Poilievre Was Right： Carney Destroyed Canada’s Negotiating Position


Episode Stats


Length

26 minutes

Words per minute

178.22

Word count

4,752

Sentence count

197

Harmful content

Misogyny

9

sentences flagged

Toxicity

8

sentences flagged

Hate speech

1

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 I like it whenever a legacy media journalist finally asks Prime Minister Mark Carney a
00:00:05.600 question about his U.S. trade strategy, because it always results in Carney stumbling all over
00:00:11.520 himself because the liberals don't have a trade strategy, unless you call it a trade strategy
00:00:18.000 for Carney to take shots at Trump in the media to score points with elbows up voters before going
00:00:23.520 behind the scenes to make a bunch of concessions to Trump and getting nothing in return. Check out
00:00:29.300 this clip where a French reporter asked him about going down to the United States and hammering out
00:00:33.840 a deal and Carney pretends she's just asking whether or not he likes to call Trump or if he
00:00:39.860 can call Trump. And at this stage in the negotiations don't you think that you should
00:00:45.120 go to the White House to meet with the president? Well first of all it's easy to talk to Mr. Trump
00:00:53.200 or for me to talk to Mr. Trump
00:00:55.700 if I feel it's necessary.
00:00:57.880 We had a conversation last week
00:01:00.620 and there will be other conversations,
00:01:04.580 but when they're necessary.
00:01:07.680 Based on how tense
00:01:09.700 the current trade relationship is,
00:01:12.160 why would it not be useful
00:01:14.120 for him to go down to Washington right now
00:01:16.440 and try and hammer out a deal? 1.00
00:01:18.900 That's what Claudia Scheinbaum from Mexico does 1.00
00:01:21.380 and she's getting a far better deal right now. 1.00
00:01:24.220 She's engaging in real hardball negotiations. 0.93
00:01:27.260 She knows what she's willing to give up, 1.00
00:01:29.000 but she also knows what she wants in return for those things.
00:01:32.280 Carney is scared of Trump,
00:01:34.120 and so he doesn't actually want to go down to Washington
00:01:37.260 and be seen getting played by him in any way.
00:01:40.540 And by the way, getting a deal doesn't mean he's getting played.
00:01:44.260 The problem is he's made expectations so sky high
00:01:47.740 that he will give up absolutely nothing
00:01:49.740 and get everything that Canada wants,
00:01:51.660 that he can't possibly go down there and speak with Trump
00:01:54.520 because it's a no-win scenario from the elbows-up perspective.
00:01:58.800 And in this clip, he basically talks like,
00:02:00.720 oh, talking with Mr. Trump?
00:02:02.500 It's easy to talk with Mr. Trump.
00:02:03.820 I've talked to him the other day about our favorite sports teams
00:02:06.840 and the last vacation I took,
00:02:08.440 and I could call him right now on my cell phone.
00:02:10.560 Nobody cares that you can talk to him.
00:02:12.800 We care what you're talking with him about, i.e., trade.
00:02:18.680 What are we willing to give up and to get what in return?
00:02:22.960 That is really what the conversation is currently about.
00:02:26.560 Pierre Polyev is right that we should be trying to build leverage right now,
00:02:29.880 but the problem is the Liberals have completely blown all of our leverage
00:02:34.400 by doing absolutely nothing in the last year and a half since he's been Prime Minister
00:02:39.460 to actually get us into a position where we have a better negotiating position.
00:02:44.440 Our negotiating position, since Carney took office, is literally worse right now.
00:02:49.980 We are not a price chooser.
00:02:52.360 We are a price taker at the moment.
00:02:55.040 But now I want to move on to another clip of him talking about the trade team going down to the United States.
00:03:00.280 Every time he talks about the current situation and Dominic LeBlanc going down, it just sounds like they're having coffee meetings.
00:03:07.980 There's no substance to any of this.
00:03:10.100 Mr. LeBlanc and Ms. Charrette, the chief negotiator, are both there in Washington with their teams and they are holding discussions, very detailed discussions, with their American counterparts.
00:03:34.320 So, yes, this is a tough negotiation.
00:03:39.320 We can change the adjective and say nasty, if you will,
00:03:43.320 but for Canada, it's about saving Canadian jobs,
00:03:47.320 about the future of Canadian businesses.
00:03:50.320 Every time he talks about trade,
00:03:52.320 all we hear is that there's talks going on,
00:03:54.320 and then he feathered in a slight jab at Trump at the end there
00:03:57.320 by saying you could call, you know, they're tough negotiations,
00:04:01.320 but you could also use another adjective and call them nasty because Trump yesterday called
00:04:06.040 the Canadian government, the Canadian officials, nasty. And apparently this is a big zing at Donald
00:04:12.120 Trump and the Americans. You have to earn taking jabs at Trump. When I say that, I mean, don't give
00:04:19.260 him a bunch of concessions and then act like you're like going to somehow like big dog him by
00:04:24.840 like mocking him. It's not how it works. And it looks really, really dumb. But do you want to see
00:04:30.880 something that canada is doing right now so we can't get to a deal with with the americans but
00:04:37.940 guys we can get a deal with benin are you not excited are you not pumped up we have a trade deal
00:04:46.540 with benin baby this is where our economy is going to take off i can feel it so melissa here says
00:04:52.700 anand just flew to benin to open an embassy and talk strategy partnership bilateral trade with
00:05:00.480 Benin. $77 million. That's less than 0.05% of our trade. Actually 0.005% of our trade. Opening
00:05:10.980 embassies and sending ministers around the world for what amounts to a rounding error? Am I missing
00:05:15.860 something? Yeah. So we're going to go down and sign a trade deal with Benin that probably costs
00:05:22.200 less valuable than all of the consulting work and all of the ambassador salaries and staff
00:05:31.300 salaries that are going to be used to actually manage the embassy in Benin. What is the point
00:05:40.800 of this? We're probably going to give them a bunch of money too. Remember, we just the other day
00:05:45.580 gave Brazil $125 million to fight climate change.
00:05:51.220 That is nearly double the amount of exports
00:05:54.300 that we send to Benin every single year.
00:05:57.860 So guys, we're at new heights.
00:06:00.080 I've never seen it better to quote a Globe and Mail article
00:06:04.120 from a liberal consultant pretending to just be Joe Regular.
00:06:07.860 Remember that from back in January,
00:06:09.460 there's this like just gushing Globe and Mail
00:06:12.560 like letter to the editor about how,
00:06:14.640 oh my goodness, I feel so optimistic for the future of the country because Carney's in charge
00:06:19.200 now. And then he looked at the guy's background, and he's like a consultant in Ottawa. He's a
00:06:24.040 retired consultant now. But like, of course, he likes Carney. Carney is basically also a
00:06:29.160 consultant. The consultants are very happy at this time. Of course, they're going to say nice
00:06:33.780 things about Carney. But now let's get back to that press conference with Mark Carney. I want
00:06:39.840 to jump over uh i want to jump back over to this question right here where he's asked about
00:06:45.340 uh the economy and how the economy is doing because every time he describes our position
00:06:50.600 again it just it just brings me back to that letter to the editor oh my goodness we're reaching
00:06:55.900 new heights that we've never seen before it's like no like that's all you can really say about
00:07:01.360 it like no no we're not and anyone who eats this stuff up which we will be getting to a little bit 1.00
00:07:06.700 later with Laura Babcock is an idiot. Do you not see the prices on shelves? Do you not see 1.00
00:07:13.680 the job losses? The reason why it's Quebec reporters who are actually pushing him on
00:07:19.440 getting a trade deal is because Quebec and Southern Ontario have been losing manufacturing
00:07:25.260 jobs left and right. Remember in the last jobs report where he was like, oh, wow, we just created
00:07:30.500 55,000 jobs or whatever the number was. And it was like, if you actually looked at the numbers,
00:07:35.200 we'd lost like a net 17,000 manufacturing jobs, mostly in Quebec and Ontario. And it's like,
00:07:41.000 yeah, that's great that we have some summer jobs that are being made and some other government
00:07:45.800 jobs and some jobs and like the, it was like the resource sector is doing pretty good because of
00:07:49.720 the elevated prices. But in terms of actual like base level economic health, we're not doing very
00:07:56.080 well right now. You've seen now the start of the transformation in the economy just beginning to
00:08:03.620 show up in the numbers.
00:08:06.000 We're creating jobs at twice the rate of the United States.
00:08:09.620 We have foreign direct investment
00:08:11.060 twice the rate of our nearest G7 competitor,
00:08:13.380 which is the United States.
00:08:15.620 We are seeing growth pick up in this quarter.
00:08:20.300 And most fundamentally, what we're
00:08:22.340 seeing is business investment beginning to pick up.
00:08:25.760 And that's because we've kept focused on what we can control.
00:08:28.820 And we have what the world wants, which
00:08:30.780 includes the greatest workers in the world. You will not be shocked when I tell you none of that
00:08:36.500 was true. Okay, let's just do the labor numbers. We're growing, our employment is growing at twice
00:08:42.640 the rate of the Americans. Depends on where you measure from. If you measure from the hole that
00:08:49.660 was right at the start of the tariff threat, a lot of jobs were lost right at the start of the tariff
00:08:53.540 threats because when there is a big economic shock coming, people actually tend to overreact
00:08:59.600 even before it happens, and a bunch of jobs are lost. Right after the first tariff set,
00:09:04.640 like we had employment drop a lot. And he's measuring since the trough to now that we have
00:09:11.280 technically created jobs at twice the rate of the United States. But that's not actually true. If
00:09:16.080 you measured before we fell into the trough, we have basically had no jobs created. If anything,
00:09:21.680 we've had a slight decrease in employment. And he's never going to come back at the end of the
00:09:27.080 summer and then fess up to the fact that, yeah, we just lost a bunch of jobs out of the economy
00:09:31.440 because I was celebrating too early when we had 88,000 jobs created in May. Most of those were
00:09:37.020 like stampede jobs and jobs for the World Cup and a bunch of census jobs and construction that
00:09:43.060 happens every year in the summer. Yes, there are some permanent jobs that are going to be, you know,
00:09:47.900 all year long for as, you know, as long as that job can be basically sustained. Yes, some of those
00:09:53.040 are created but they're pretty few and far between okay another point here he brings up the the the
00:09:59.840 like the growth economy or let's say the the foreign direct investment they're not investing
00:10:05.840 in creating new businesses in canada we have foreign dollars coming in from other countries
00:10:11.280 to buy up undervalued canadian assets because it's a bad economy right now and a lot of these
00:10:17.760 company's values are falling so you have people coming in from america from china from india from
00:10:23.920 qatar from the uae and coming and buying up businesses actual growth is not there at all
00:10:31.760 a lot of these other things that he's mentioning just are kind of like only true if you're measuring
00:10:37.840 from like a deep pit oh wow look we created jobs twice as fast as the americans well yeah but they
00:10:44.000 but they never had a giant job drop-off that they're measuring from.
00:10:48.060 We're not doing that.
00:10:48.800 I actually have to go back and remember some of the points that he was making there.
00:10:51.360 There's another one I know I'm missing.
00:10:52.600 The start of the transformation in the economy.
00:10:55.220 Okay, no, I remember immediately.
00:10:57.160 I hate this talking point.
00:10:59.200 Oh, we're just starting to see all the benefits appearing now.
00:11:02.800 We're just starting to see the transformation in the economy bringing positive effects.
00:11:08.120 No, no.
00:11:09.320 Do you know how I know this isn't true?
00:11:10.900 because he's claimed this multiple times before now he's claimed that we're having all these great
00:11:17.180 effects of his leadership on our economy back in 2025 and then that didn't work out and then a few
00:11:24.040 months later right before christmas in 25 we're like oh look at all these jobs being created this
00:11:28.460 is just carnianomics it's just he's just doing such a it's just because i'm so i just build so
00:11:33.000 much confidence in this economy and that's why we just made we just created 120 000 jobs before the
00:11:39.500 holiday season. If you think about it, I actually invented Christmas. And that's why all these
00:11:44.220 retail jobs were started. And then when all those retail jobs fell off in January, like they do
00:11:48.700 every year, I don't blame him for that. That's just how it works. Although we lost a lot of
00:11:52.060 permanent jobs too. He then waited a few months after that. And then something good happened.
00:11:56.580 And he was like, oh, we'll see that just shows you the transformation. The economy's just getting
00:12:00.160 started. And then like three months later, again, now he's like, well, our GDP has grown by like
00:12:08.560 3.5% in a month or whatever compared to last year. That shows you, you know, carnionomics is really
00:12:14.600 helping and we're seeing the start of something beautiful. It's like, no, the GDP went up that
00:12:20.360 much because of resource prices. Resource prices. It's not because of more productivity in other
00:12:26.200 fields. It's just resource prices going up, which meant that the GDP went up. It's very hollow GDP
00:12:32.580 growth. And by the way, also, half of the new net permanent jobs created in the Canadian economy
00:12:40.300 backs up what I'm saying there, because half of them were created in Alberta.
00:12:45.000 That's because of elevated resource prices because of the Iran war. Unless Carney secretly
00:12:50.500 started the Iran war, unless he secretly got the Ayatollah to start funding terrorism everywhere,
00:12:56.060 thus getting the United States to bomb the crap out of them, he is not responsible for any of
00:13:01.720 economic growth none of his 20 years in the future projects are causing any of this but now i want to
00:13:09.000 move on to pier polio's press conference today i think that he's been i think he's doing a pretty
00:13:14.280 good job here when it comes to attacking him on multiple fronts with both the trade with trade
00:13:19.400 and the economy i'm going to start off with the trade clip where he goes over all the concessions
00:13:24.040 he's been making recently because that is kind of the main theme of this video i don't understand
00:13:31.720 the strategy of making concession after concession after concession
00:13:38.180 before even getting to the negotiating table.
00:13:42.040 To be clear, Mr. Carney is not holding out for a better deal.
00:13:46.380 We have a bad deal.
00:13:48.280 While he makes the concessions
00:13:50.320 that you would normally take to the table to get something in return,
00:13:55.940 he backed down on the digital services tax, the Netflix tax.
00:14:00.240 he agreed to mr trump's demands on military spending and counter tariffs many of these
00:14:07.440 things were going to have to happen but why not bring them to the to the bargaining table
00:14:12.920 and get something in return for them rather than making every concession and then showing up
00:14:20.820 empty-handed and in a position of weakness when we bargain so we still do have some leverage that
00:14:28.260 Mr. Carney has not yet squandered. We have military purchases and our massive capacity to
00:14:36.960 build up our and stockpile our natural resources to the potential benefit of tariff-free allies.
00:14:42.960 I would bring that and other leverage to the table as quickly as possible.
00:14:47.500 And I would say the United States wants to get what it wants. We want what we want,
00:14:53.980 which is tariff-free access to their market for aluminum, steel, autos, and lumber.
00:15:02.740 They must get rid of those tariffs, and then we can work with them to consider their demands in return.
00:15:11.360 Apparently, according to other people like liberals in the media,
00:15:14.780 what Pierre Polyev is doing here is very bad negotiating because he's laying his cards on the table.
00:15:19.940 It's like, no, he's actually being an adult here and publicly stating the fact that you do need to make concessions to get things in return is, in fact, smart.
00:15:28.880 He's basically naming what he wants, and he's saying the things that he may have been willing to give up in return.
00:15:35.020 Carney has been doing this weird way where he's both playing everything super close to the vest, but he's not even playing his cards smart.
00:15:43.760 He's not letting you see what he's playing, but then he's just slapping stuff out for nothing in return. 0.83
00:15:48.500 It's absolutely ridiculous. 0.57
00:15:49.940 I would love for somebody in the liberal media to explain how what Pierre Polyev said there 0.82
00:15:55.740 is wrong in any way. There was actually a panel, I believe it was on CBC or CTV News. I watched a
00:16:01.060 little bits of it, and it's been kind of been talked about quite a bit, where the panel was
00:16:04.880 actually agreeing with what Pierre Polyev was saying. They were like, well, actually, yeah,
00:16:09.640 his strategic mineral and energy reserve is a pretty good idea, basically saying that we'll
00:16:15.640 have stockpiled oil and gas and minerals. And whenever there's an economic shock that requires
00:16:22.440 resources to be released so that we can keep prices cheap, Canada is fully willing to give
00:16:27.740 access to those cheap resources to the United States. But they have to take a bunch of tariffs
00:16:32.120 off of us because, hey, we got to be in this thing together. That is a smart idea. Saying that
00:16:36.840 all these taxes that as a conservative I want to get rid of anyways, duct tape them together and
00:16:41.120 say DST, streaming tax, military spending, those things I'll give you. I'll get rid of supply
00:16:47.300 management too. We can get rid of all of it, but I need all the tariffs off of those things.
00:16:51.520 Carney at his own press conference even said that he fully stands by the supply management system.
00:16:57.340 It's like, okay, so what else do we have? What other leverage do we have? What are the things
00:17:02.480 can we offer to get something in return? He is seemingly dedicated at wasting every single
00:17:09.040 opportunity he has to get something done uh now i want to quickly jump over to uh his sort of
00:17:17.120 statement when it comes to the economy and i'm going to try and pull up that clip of carney
00:17:20.840 talking about the uh supply management cost of the carney liberals includes higher gas grocery
00:17:27.940 and housing bills inflation has been above target for most of the last five years and canada has
00:17:33.840 the worst grocery inflation anywhere in the g7 over four years the cost of buying an average
00:17:41.020 single-family home in st john's is up 50 that is basically hyperinflation the average asking
00:17:47.720 rent for a two-bedroom apartment is up six percent just year over year no wonder that this past
00:17:53.720 November, on any given night, 469 St. John's residents were homeless, up 17% from the year
00:18:03.920 before. All this comes as the liberal credit card budgeting has inflated the cost of living.
00:18:10.460 The parliamentary budget officer is predicting things will get things worse. First of all,
00:18:14.680 Mark Carney has doubled the deficit that Justin Trudeau left behind. We were told that he was
00:18:20.400 going to be a tight-fisted banker rather than an out-of-control spender like his predecessor but
00:18:26.220 that was an illusion what we have is twice the deficit that was projected by his already
00:18:31.660 irresponsible liberal predecessor and the parliamentary budget officer found that just
00:18:35.840 there is just a one percent chance that the government will meet its fiscal anchor and
00:18:41.080 fiscal anchor meaning that one percent chance doesn't even mean that we you know might be
00:18:45.880 to get to a balanced budget that just means that we're not going to blow out the the the numbers
00:18:51.320 that they had said in their subsequent budgets so your fiscal anchor if it holds the whole idea is
00:18:56.200 if everything goes well if the revenues come in right then we will be able to have the deficit
00:19:02.280 slowly go down over time like the government always says it's going to one percent chance
00:19:08.120 that is not going to be higher than they predict it could end up being even higher than this year
00:19:11.960 which was supposed to be the highest year but now i want to take you guys over back to that supply
00:19:16.840 management clip with mark carney because this is truly like the crux of the trade problem i'm not
00:19:23.160 saying that just just give it to trump just get rid of supply management and just give him whatever
00:19:28.200 you want obviously there's always going to be a little back and forth hardball maybe even if you're
00:19:32.680 not in favor of supply management pretend you actually want to keep supply management and make
00:19:36.760 trump give you more for it than he may have done it because you're willing to basically do engage
00:19:41.160 in some brinksmanship. Hey, maybe I'll double my tariffs if you don't give me no tariffs on
00:19:46.840 softwood and aluminum and I'll give you supply management. If you don't make that deal, I'm
00:19:51.460 going to double my tariffs. That's totally fine. I'm not saying to be nice to the Trump
00:19:56.200 administration. They're not expecting you to be nice. It's a negotiation. You're going to be hard
00:20:00.080 on each other. But when you just keep taking things off the table arbitrarily, even if you're
00:20:04.920 a fan of supply management, I don't know why you would be unless you're in the dairy industry and
00:20:09.540 get part of the quota even if you are somehow not a farmer and you still like supply management
00:20:15.380 at least be pretending you might be willing to part ways with it but the problem is the liberal
00:20:20.900 party is so beholden to the dairy cartel that they are not willing to even allow themselves
00:20:26.020 to have this card at the negotiating table even as a feint i believe in supply management
00:20:31.380 it's important in order to stabilize prices for canadian consumers and also to protect the way
00:20:40.660 of life of small farms and our canadian heritage if you want to protect the lifestyle or the like
00:20:49.540 you want to protect the small farm lifestyle cut their taxes just massively cut their taxes and by
00:20:56.180 the way it was proven by the fruit food professor sylvian charlebois which is an amazing name to say
00:21:01.700 i wish my name was sylvia charlebois but he pointed out that in fact canada per capita for
00:21:07.620 our farms does subsidize our dairy farms more than the americans do both in direct and indirect ways
00:21:14.260 he's saying that it's for stabilizing prices that's the opposite of what it does unless he
00:21:18.500 means stabilizing prices at a higher price because it was found that if your household
00:21:23.940 is making less than $70,000 a year, you may be paying like 1.5% of your household income
00:21:30.340 in just the added cost of supply management on things like dairy, poultry, and eggs. It's
00:21:39.380 absolutely nuts how much it costs a family. You can say it's 1.5% only. That's not a lot.
00:21:46.440 Anyone saying that, I'm taking your card away. I don't even know what the card
00:21:49.900 represents, but your card's been taken away. Because 1.5%, to pay for the consequences of a 1.00
00:21:56.080 crappy piece of regulation, that is a massive amount, because that's on top of all the other
00:22:01.720 taxes you're already paying. But now I want to go back over to, do we need to go back to pure
00:22:07.020 Polyev? I actually might want to now go over to the clip of Laura Babcock. I don't think I can
00:22:13.240 hold myself back from doing it. I think we have to do it, guys. So here's Laura Babcock giving
00:22:18.980 the elbows up Canadian perspective
00:22:21.240 on everything that's going on here
00:22:23.040 screaming about Trump and saying how
00:22:25.160 cool we are or whatever because we're not
00:22:27.280 the Americans
00:22:27.860 I play Laura Babcock clips
00:22:31.380 not both
00:22:32.640 I have a real reason to and I
00:22:35.200 have like a funny
00:22:37.300 reason to. The funny reason to is
00:22:39.460 she makes me laugh. I love
00:22:41.120 Laura Babcock. She's amazing
00:22:42.820 and the other reason, the real reason
00:22:45.120 I play her clips is because this is what
00:22:47.060 a certain segment of hardcore liberal voters actually believes. And you have to realize what
00:22:53.040 they actually believe in order to be able to outmaneuver them in politics. You actually have
00:22:58.360 to kind of study up on people like this, so that if you are ever door knocking for a conservative
00:23:02.940 campaign, you can say, by the way, these people actually think that life's getting better, that
00:23:08.320 prices are going down. They simply will tell you that thinking you're dumb enough to keep voting 0.98
00:23:13.320 liberal because they're going to tell you everything's great. This is actually how 0.96
00:23:17.280 unintelligent they think you are. People in Canada are pissed off at this Trump regime. We are pissed 0.72
00:23:24.320 off at how we've been treated from these tariffs to the Gordie Howe bridge to the comments that
00:23:29.940 we're doing terribly, which is a lie, that we're nasty, which is a lie. Canadians have had enough.
00:23:35.420 Trump can't stand the fact that Canada doesn't just acquiesce to his demands. He can't stand
00:23:40.480 the fact that we keep getting stronger in our boycott that we've had a boom in tourism that
00:23:44.880 we've had a boom in exports that we're behind our prime minister no we've not had a boom in exports
00:23:52.320 aren't we've had a technical like a rise in non-us exports but those still do not make up
00:24:01.680 for the exports that we've lost going to the united states oh he's he's mad about the boom
00:24:07.040 we've had to our tourism have we i have not really noticed unless we're just talking about
00:24:11.680 the tourism associated with world cup which it doesn't count because the united states also
00:24:17.340 experienced that boom as well as mexico oh he just doesn't like how unified we are in our boycott
00:24:23.900 doesn't care that much like the thing is that the alcohol boycott is kind of a bit of a just a
00:24:30.880 pest you know it's just a bit of an annoyance to the united states it's not a big enough thing to
00:24:36.000 hit for that to actually shape u.s trade policy but though this whole thing where we're just going
00:24:41.820 to pump ourselves up and just tell ourselves how you know how great we are because we're not the
00:24:46.680 americans like guys this is why we're in the situation we're in and by the way why does she
00:24:51.000 care about the tariffs if we our exports if our exports are booming right now why should we hate
00:24:55.700 the americans at all this has basically been a big nothing burger we've been liberated from trading
00:25:00.780 with the united states and we're making more money than ever trading with benin or whatever
00:25:05.120 it's not true but these people are willing to hold these contradictory thoughts in their minds
00:25:10.360 the U.S. is bad because they're hurting us by tariffing us also we don't need them because
00:25:14.420 our trade is booming we have more exports than ever and he can go screw himself like okay whatever
00:25:21.780 just go drink your local alcohol of choice Laura just make sure to wash it down with your lithium
00:25:28.880 because you need it anyways with all that being said thank you guys for watching this episode of
00:25:35.000 the show. Make sure to leave a like on the video if you are a fan of the channel. Subscribe if you
00:25:39.460 are not yet a subscriber of the channel. Leave a comment on what you think about all this. Consider
00:25:44.680 hitting the join button below the video if you want to become a monthly contributing member of
00:25:48.680 the channel. It really helps me out. And if you happen to live in the southwest area of Calgary
00:25:54.440 in the Calgary-Curry provincial riding, I am going to be running for the United Conservative Party
00:26:00.180 nomination for that routing and try and take it back from the current NDP MLA Janet Aramanco who 0.91
00:26:06.820 is an absolute disaster a pro safe supply pro consumption site non-profit advocate before she 0.87
00:26:14.260 became an MLA she wants to reopen the consumer consumption site and push a bunch of other
00:26:20.180 government drug programs on to into the public she needs to go and it is actually a winnable 0.68
00:26:26.820 riding despite the fact that she won last time by 13 percentage points. I'd only be running there 0.99
00:26:31.940 if it was a challenge because it's not fun to run in a safe seat.
00:26:35.920 Anyways, with all that being said, thank you guys for watching and I'll see you all later.