00:00:00.000So, despite the fact that Prime Minister Mark Carney and the Liberal government haven't shown us the draft trade deal that Carney walked away from,
00:00:08.960they want Canadians to blindly support them in placing counter-tariffs on the United States while they're also not recalling Parliament.
00:00:17.680In fact, Carney is just uploading YouTube videos of him justifying his actions while also not showing us anything.
00:00:25.680Now, you could say that, well, the Trump administration originally started tariffing
00:00:30.820Canada, and that makes them the villains here. Hey, I don't like the tariffs, and sure, I want
00:00:36.980them off, but Carney has lied multiple times when it comes to the trade issue with the United States.
00:00:43.760Heck, we just found out that we're now going to get into a military partnership with the CCP in
00:00:49.420China, and it wasn't even the liberal government that put the press release out that caused
00:00:54.320Canadians to find out about it. It was the Chinese government. Carney is extremely inconsistent on
00:01:00.740trade and foreign policy. And so, yes, we actually do need to see the man's homework before we are
00:01:07.240going to support any counter tariffs. Really, this just looks like political theater. And that is
00:01:13.060what is touched on in this clip I want to play for you from a panel that happened this morning
00:01:18.120at a Breitbart News event where Secretary of the Treasury Scott Besant says that Mark Carney has
00:01:24.880to stop playing politics. He has to stop campaigning and start governing. We've seen
00:01:30.820today, in fact, that Canada has decided to put on their tariffs, I believe starting this morning,
00:01:43.900and we just recently heard the Canadian Prime Minister
00:01:49.080warning his people that they are in for pain.
00:01:52.560Give us your perspective on Canadian trade belligerence.
00:01:56.780Yeah, look, I think Prime Minister needs to stop campaigning
00:02:11.600and he rose to power he was a far behind the conservative candidate and are you related
00:02:20.820no relation that we know about okay it doesn't seem like plan is huge though right yeah we
00:02:27.440never really there's many of us yeah okay but look it it's good he's now being honest with
00:02:34.540canadian people and that i i i well it was i got some applause online i i took some uh shrapnel
00:02:45.020when i said look i used to have 110 pound german shepherd there was a dachshund miniature dachshund
00:02:51.420who used to bother at the the dog park and then one day my dog couldn't take it anymore and he'd
00:02:58.060had enough of the yapping and it's about the same like a miniature dachshund weighs eight pounds
00:03:05.580my german shepherd weighed 110 the u.s economy is about 13 times larger uh but
00:03:13.180that i think we will get through this that the president offered uh prime minister carney the
00:03:20.860best trade deal and i'm not sure why he walked away we we will see if this and that's the question
00:03:27.740I have. I want to know why we walked away. And by the way, I disagree with people like Scott
00:03:32.480Besant and Howard Lutnick and Jameson Greer and President Trump when they keep saying that Canada
00:03:37.640was given the best trade deal on the planet compared to any other country. Yes, in a vacuum
00:03:43.040was the trade terms maybe better than what other countries got because other countries were facing
00:03:47.780like a blanket 7-10% tariff on everything as part of their deal. Yes, I guess in fact Canada has a
00:03:56.040better deal because we get a bunch of our exports still going into the United States tariff-free
00:04:01.480and the tariffs are only on specific goods. The problem though is obviously it's not a good deal
00:04:06.280relative to the amount that we export to the United States. That is a problem. But Scott
00:04:11.880Besant is right from the perspective that Carney is campaigning. He is doing politics off the back
00:04:18.600of all this and it's going to cause a lot of pain for Canadians before we actually get to a deal
00:04:24.600that we probably should have been signing a year and a half ago when he first became the prime
00:04:29.240minister or right after he was elected as prime minister in his own right not just winning a
00:04:34.400liberal leadership race like i this is why we need to see the draft deal what did he actually
00:04:39.600walk away because of because from my perspective we have an incoherent trade strategy where carney
00:04:45.240for some reason was about to sign on to a deal that had still 25 steel and aluminum tariffs in
00:04:52.200place, but he was deeply upset by and walked away from the deal because of Bill C-11 and C-18 and a
00:05:00.240China deal needing to be scrapped. Just incoherent red lines drawn around certain issues that I would
00:05:06.920be more than glad to give up in order to get a good trade deal with lower tariffs. Why not? Get
00:05:14.800rid of the China deal if we can get lower tariffs on all autos. That would be a good thing, but for
00:05:19.860some reason, we want to leave all of that stuff off the table. We won't touch supply management.
00:05:25.360We won't touch our own censorship and language bills that, again, will not affect the French
00:05:31.340language. It's just that American corporations don't want to have to pay for French language
00:05:35.480laws. That seems kind of reasonable. Again, that doesn't mean I think their whole tariff strategy
00:05:40.760is reasonable. I'm saying in this particular situation, that's a reasonable thing to give up
00:05:47.200in order to, you know, save the steel and aluminum industry in this country? Right now,
00:05:52.880we have President Trump basically doubling down on his offer to steel and aluminum and copper
00:05:58.860companies in Canada that, hey, I'll give you a really great deal if you just move your operations
00:06:04.800down here. And I'm sorry that as much as people want to imply that, you know, that patriotism
00:06:12.700in Canada is stronger than the economy, people are going to go bankrupt for Mark Carney. And
00:06:18.080there's actually new polling out to that effect that I'm going to be covering in another video.
00:06:22.000Now I want to jump over to the videos of Mark Carney speaking to the public from this YouTube
00:06:28.920video that he just uploaded a little bit ago. Now again, there is maybe even some points I'm
00:06:34.120going to agree with Mark Carney on, but the whole point is now what? How do we get to a good deal?
00:06:39.980You can't just keep saying that they're being unfair to us. None of this is about fairness. Who cares about fair? Let's care about the best possible outcome, not simply walking away from deals because we want to, like, I guess, protect our pride.
00:06:55.900We don't want to get rid of C-11 because, oh, I don't want the Americans to force us to, you know, to get rid of our language laws or our media policies.0.65
00:07:04.500It's like, oh, my goodness, just do it.0.97
00:07:07.040People are losing their jobs and we're going to stop it over our Netflix streaming policies.
00:07:11.760But check out this video from the prime minister.
00:07:15.040By now, you've likely heard something about the collapse of our trade talks with the United States.
00:07:21.020Yes, and we still haven't seen the deal, which is remarkable, Mark.
00:07:24.160and you probably heard that we could not accept what they were proposing no no no that's what
00:07:30.380you said you said that it was unacceptable we couldn't accept it that's the problem here it's
00:07:36.760it's everything according to mark carney and liberals on social media and even some conservatives
00:07:42.040like jason kenny and harrison faulkner and ben woodfindan think that we should just blanketly
00:07:47.840trust him because he's the canadian and we should always back whoever the canadian in the situation
00:07:52.060is. I like Canada. I also don't think it's a great thing for Canadians to be lied to
00:07:57.140about what's going on. I think we actually need to see what the deal looked like, because that
00:08:02.240will help guide what we are willing to do and where we need leverage or where we may need to
00:08:06.860give a smaller concession up somewhere in order to get a better deal. But he doesn't want us to
00:08:11.120actually be able to peek behind the curtain and see what the lay of the land is. He is walking
00:08:16.900out of the room and telling you how bad things are in that room without actually letting us know
00:08:20.860what's actually going on. He's just telling you it's really bad. So who cares if I'm failing?
00:08:25.500Now it's time for you, as he literally says in this video somewhere, you're going to have to
00:08:30.880face more pain because I couldn't accept the deal and we need to put pressure on them by putting in
00:08:36.200place counter tariffs. What was the deal? Shut up. Let's be clear. It's a shame because a mutually
00:08:44.480beneficial trade agreement between Canada and the United States is possible, one that respects
00:08:51.100our sovereignty, one that builds on our complementary strengths. What does our sovereignty
00:08:57.220here mean, though? Does it mean not having deals with China? I think that's a fought-out benefit.
00:09:05.040That's a fringe benefit of the trade deal if the Trump administration actually batters us out
00:09:10.340of partnering with China, both on culture security, as well as integrating our economies more with
00:09:17.040them. I don't want them dumping EVs in our country. They steal IP from other countries
00:09:21.960to make their goods cheaper so that they can out-compete you. That's not the normal free
00:09:26.200market. That's piracy. That's bootleggers basically taking a DVD, copying it, and selling it, but
00:09:32.100they never had to go through the cost of actually making and producing the movie. They were just0.93
00:09:37.020basically having their content stolen by people who can just copy it onto DVDs. That's effectively
00:09:42.360what the Chinese engage in. And that's why I don't want to trade with them. But apparently1.00
00:09:46.800our sovereignty equals not getting rid of Bill C-18, a media censorship law, and not working
00:09:53.560with a country that Carney himself said was Canada's greatest national security threat. But
00:09:58.120I'll let him go on longer here. I've rambled enough. One that lowers costs for families on
00:10:03.620both sides of the border, one that creates good jobs for our workers. Canada has always worked
00:10:11.540towards these goals, even while America's attention and dedication to them has wavered.
00:10:18.060Canada has consistently proposed long-term partnerships, while the U.S. has too often
00:10:24.260demanded short-term transactions. At the 11th hour, they were still pursuing restrictions on
00:10:31.240our ability to protect and promote the french language and no that's a lie they did not do that
00:10:38.780they've done many things i do not like again i do not like the original tariffs he he'd been trying
00:10:44.560to basically twist uh them staying firm that they don't like c11 and c18 into they may change his
00:10:52.180last minute notice what he does he's very rhetorically savvy in how he phrases stuff
00:10:57.800listen to this short-term transactions at the 11th hour they were still pursuing restrictions
00:11:04.060on our ability to protect and promote the French language protect and promote means that they
00:11:10.620wanted to mess with streaming algorithms the YouTube algorithm within Canada that is what
00:11:18.040protect and promote means as well as taxing companies including American companies in order
00:11:24.740to pay for french language and you know canadian government approved content and like effectively
00:11:32.420like um so we're going to be messing with the algorithms and having the american companies pay
00:11:37.520for the production of that content that is protecting and promoting and then he says they
00:11:42.540were still insisting on this stuff at the 11th hour that's not an 11th hour change that is saying
00:11:47.080they've been consistently saying this for a long time and they were still saying at the 11th hour
00:11:51.640if they stopped saying at the 11th hour then that actually would be a change but Carney keeps trying
00:11:56.680to twist the fact that they were still doing something he didn't like the 11th hour as last
00:12:01.340minute changes but he's he's very clever in how he phrases it so he's technically not lying here
00:12:07.100but he's saying it in such a way that implies like sudden wrongdoing when in fact he's saying
00:12:13.240that their consistent position was we don't want American companies and streaming services having
00:12:17.940to basically conform with Canadian government goals and pay for Canadian government-approved
00:12:22.900content. And our culture. They wanted a say in our future trade agreements with other countries.
00:12:29.840And they were... China. That's what he's talking about. China, our greatest national security
00:12:33.800threat. Carney is defending Xi Jinping in China. I doubt the Americans care if we sign a trade
00:12:40.380agreement with Italy. I really doubt he cares if we sign an agreement with Spain or the UK.
00:12:46.220unless for some reason like we had promised the u.s 80 of our potash in saskatchewan and then we
00:12:51.920promised 40 of it to another country that would be a problem but really trump just cares about
00:12:57.400the china element that's why he tweeted out about the statement that came out from the chinese
00:13:02.200government about canada and china's militaries cooperating again because that's kind of a big
00:13:06.920deal they're kind of the mortal enemy of the american government at this point the chinese
00:13:12.840Communist Party government. Offering terms that would, over time, undermine some of the most
00:13:18.860important industries in our country, including automobiles, steel, and forest products.
00:13:25.760In short, they were asking far too much and offering far too little. We worked in good faith
00:13:33.540to reach a fair deal. But since a fair deal wasn't on the table, we made the right choice
00:13:39.240to walk away from a bad one why is walking away inherently a good move why is that inherently the
00:13:47.740right move you could have just kept negotiating and said hey what's on the table right now
00:13:52.340i'm not going to sign this but let's keep going because i can't sign that but what can you do
00:13:57.980but i'm going to walk away if you don't offer anything else he just walked away like everyone
00:14:02.440was shocked because they had basically been promoting it literally it was said on the ctv
00:14:06.840on CTV News by Vashti Capellos, that Canadian negotiators and other spokespeople for the
00:14:13.060government were running around saying how great the deal was to the very second Carney walked
00:14:17.240away from it. So they were already trying to sell this thing. And then Carney just walked away.
00:14:22.980He's the one who probably realized it wasn't going to go over very well, because he basically
00:14:27.860was going to sign a lopsided deal where we were going to have oddly high tariffs in place still0.98
00:14:32.400in exchange for not having to give up stupid policies like our China deal and other stuff,0.99
00:14:37.340and then he left. We never even had that part of the deal that we are going to walk away from the0.99
00:14:42.220China deal. He just simply said that he didn't like that their attitude was still that we
00:14:45.800shouldn't be trading with China. And I say China, even though he won't specify the country,
00:14:49.900because again, who else is he talking about? Peru? Come on.
00:14:55.680The most fundamental issue is that the cumulative U.S. demands revealed that they wanted us
00:15:02.380to become even more reliant on them not less in too many areas they wanted dependency not a true
00:15:10.060economic partnership you know it'd be really great if he would actually show us the deal so we could
00:15:17.740see that and by the way we're dependent on them because they're south of our border in fact you
00:15:24.700might notice we don't share a border with any other country that's just kind of the reality i'm sorry
00:15:31.500we're not going to suddenly make our trade 70% with the rest of the world. It's just not
00:15:38.280logistically feasible. We have ports that can be built on the west and east coast,
00:15:44.180and then everything needs to be trucked to then the center of the country or put it on a train.
00:15:48.920Isn't it kind of nice that we can just drive things, especially in the middle of the country,
00:15:52.640over the border into the United States, that Saskatchewan potash can just be moved into the
00:15:57.500united states that alberta oil and gas yes i want to i want to export it on both coasts to asia and
00:16:04.040to europe and to africa but isn't it nice a bunch of it can also just go right over the border into
00:16:08.720the united states apparently liberals see this as like a fatal flaw of canada that we trade in large
00:16:14.660portion with our with like our only neighbor who also has the biggest land border we have the
00:16:22.040biggest land border with a land border that is bigger between canada the united states compared
00:16:26.860to every other land border on the planet is the biggest land border and for some reason we see
00:16:31.420this as like a sign of like great weakness this isn't the first time americans have tried to use
00:16:37.100tariffs to break us before he became president william mckinley was an ohio congressman known
00:16:42.700as the napoleon of protection mckinley championed the tariff act of 1890 it put 50 tariffs on our
00:16:50.940exports to the U.S. Sound familiar? McKinley's 50% tariff was... What was that like foreboding
00:16:58.680sound familiar thing? Like yeah, William McKinley did that basically in order to not have like
00:17:04.460income taxes or other sorts of taxes. From McKinley's perspective, it was actually kind of
00:17:09.520an okay move at the time because they were having very low internal taxes and then they were having
00:17:14.800high external taxes. That's just a policy. As if like America is supposed to think about Canada
00:17:20.220deeply when it doesn't move like that that's just probably good domestic policy like if canada just
00:17:26.460slashed income taxes and then we place tariffs on other countries good move honestly not a bad move
00:17:33.020now i'm in favor of low tariffs in general i don't want any tariffs ideally i'd like a balance where
00:17:38.960you can have low tariffs and then some domestic taxes in order to kind of balance it out uh but
00:17:44.640like goodness like why are we acting like this is sinister meant to pressure us into dependence and
00:17:50.560eventually annexation by the united states in reality it did just the opposite rather than
00:17:57.520getting weaker canada grew stronger instead of becoming more dependent we diversified by changing
00:18:05.040who we did business with and at the same time inflation rose in the united states sorry the
00:18:11.040the Americans in 1890 or the 1890s were not trying to annex us. In fact, the only American
00:18:17.600president who ever brought it up was like Teddy Roosevelt, because Teddy Roosevelt was a little
00:18:21.660crazy sometimes, and he never did it, even though he actually invaded other countries when he was
00:18:25.880president. Like, no. The whole idea that like, oh, well, by the way, if tariffs make Canada
00:18:33.200stronger, shouldn't he be very excited that all this is going on? Shouldn't he be thanking
00:18:37.140president trump or does he not actually mean that like let's be clear the tariffs are bad and now
00:18:42.460he's trying to like spoon feed canadians the idea like yeah i i failed to get a good deal and i'm
00:18:47.820barely trying to do it in general but really even though this is going to cause a lot of economic
00:18:52.480pain you should be okay with it because in fact it's going to make us better in the long run
00:18:57.180no it won't it really won't the reason that canada started booming in like after the 1890s or so
00:19:05.880was that's just because we had high immigration that started filling out western Canada. We
00:19:10.600started industrializing a lot. That was just kind of the normal arc of history for Canada that went
00:19:15.740on. It really didn't have much to do with American tariffs on Canadian goods at the time. We didn't
00:19:21.020really export that much back in the earlier 19th century because it's Canada. It's a lot of
00:19:27.500subsistence farmers. There was not a lot of produce that was getting loaded onto boats
00:19:31.720or going into the United States in the first place.
00:19:35.740But anyways, and also the immigration boom to the United States
00:19:38.180also meant that they didn't really need to import a lot of food from Canada
00:19:41.340because they were also filling out massive amounts of farms
00:19:44.700with new immigrants coming from Europe.
00:19:47.020You know, Ireland was more in the mid-19th century,
00:19:49.660but then you had Germans and the Italians and Jews
00:19:53.280and other people from other countries.
00:19:55.540But his actual history here is just really, really bad.
00:19:59.780But now he wants us to all stay Canada Strong because he can't sign a deal and he can't show it to us.0.95
00:20:06.600It's all just so hypocritical and sad.
00:20:11.060Canadians are going to stand strong together, but Canadians also are not strong enough to actually see the deal and be able to evaluate it for themselves.0.94
00:20:20.040Canada Strong isn't just about withstanding this crisis.
00:20:23.480It's about coming out of it stronger, more resilient, and more independent than when we started.
00:20:29.780It's about ensuring that no country can ever hold us hostage.
00:20:45.100And, like, I know some people are on pure poly of today because he's saying that, yes, absolutely, there could be a case for counter tariffs.
00:20:52.480And, you know, we're going to stand united and all that.
00:20:56.040But he is being consistent, saying we still need to recall parliament and we still need to see the deal because right now we're flying blind. And by the way, in the middle of this tariff crisis, when the United States supposedly should be getting gravely injured by their own tariffs, and it probably is slowing their economy somewhat, they still grew 160,000 jobs in August.
00:21:18.500we fell 42,000 jobs, and we do not have the government acknowledging this whatsoever. We
00:21:24.700don't even have Mark Carney taking any press conferences recently. Again, this was a YouTube
00:21:30.240video that he uploaded to his own channel because he doesn't want a journalist being able to ask him
00:21:36.040a question back. Hey, what about all of the jobs that we've been losing recently? He just posted
00:21:41.340this one video and then left it at that. This is what Canadians apparently are owed, simply0.96
00:21:47.600a video talking at you telling you what you should believe with no actual opportunity for a journalist
00:21:55.420or reporter to say hey what about all the job losses what are you going to do to actually build
00:22:00.600up the domestic economy because so far all of your ideas are failing because it doesn't matter what
00:22:05.500the americans are doing to us if we had a good domestic economy this would not be hurting us
00:22:10.860very much we would be growing every quarter consistently not falling for two quarters
00:22:15.780falling into a recession then kind of popping back out in the third in the second quarter and
00:22:20.600then dropping again probably in this next quarter it's just all so topsy-turvy it's bad and no it is
00:22:28.560not traitorous to actually demand real answers from mark carney and to need to see the deal
00:22:33.980again i don't think it's a bad thing exactly for canada to give up bill c11 c18 our china deal or
00:22:41.320supply management in order to get what Canadians actually want, which is low tariffs on the
00:22:46.680industries that matter. Supply management is literally tariffs on the United States. It's
00:22:51.440tariffs on all outside dairy, poultry, eggs, and there's even certain tariffs on other goods like
00:22:57.560pork and beef. Why are we apparently allowed to keep those in place and it's to protect Canadian
00:23:03.060jobs, but if the Americans put tariffs on us, it's actually an attack on us. It's not to protect
00:23:07.520American jobs. And by the way, tariffs are bad. But I'm saying the logic doesn't make sense here.
00:23:13.300We have all these people telling us that it's good to protect Canadian jobs with our own
00:23:18.160regulations and tariffs, but it's deeply negative that Trump is doing it. So either it's all good
00:23:23.900or it's all bad. And I, in fact, believe it's all bad, which is why we should use some of our
00:23:28.420current tariffs in order to try and get lower tariffs on things like steel and aluminum.
00:24:01.460If you think wanting to know more about the trade deal our government walked away from makes Canadians traitors, then you don't really care about Canada.0.91
00:24:08.740Who argues in defense of keeping Canadians ignorant?
00:24:11.300No one who's advocating for Canada's best interests.