00:06:44.340And then I just want to go up to what I specifically said about it.
00:06:47.780So Spencer Fernando here over a headline that says, China, U.S. military commander, snap, two-year break with talks in Canada.
00:06:55.600So the talks took place in Victoria, British Columbia, and so the Canadian military, American military, and Chinese military were present.
00:07:04.360And Spencer Fernando says, I'm sure the fact that the U.S. also resume military talks with China will receive just as much attention from those trying to hype this up.
00:07:14.340um it's not it's not because we're hypocrites it's because america is not militarily coordinating
00:07:20.820they communicate in order to again avoid miscommunication to avoid miscalculation
00:07:27.660in order so that there isn't a war where american jets are sinking chinese ships so that the troops
00:07:34.920don't try and start landing on the taiwanese on the island of taiwan and american navy ships and
00:07:40.800aircraft carriers have to show up to try and stop them. Yeah, they talk in that way. What business
00:07:47.240does Canada have to do militarily coordinating, which is quite a bit more than just talking?
00:07:52.940Again, the Chinese Ministry of National Defense never released a statement. Know who else never
00:07:57.840released a statement about it? Canada, because it's obviously a bad look. We let the Chinese
00:08:03.320government do it, and we didn't say a mumbling word about it. And then we have Jason Kenney here0.69
00:08:08.840reacting to spencer fernando spencer fernando what's really funny about this is he's supposed
00:08:12.920to be a foreign policy hawk i am i'm very hawkish on foreign policy i went to a bitter bigger
00:08:18.400military and we were more like america when it comes to the military but now he's like doing
00:08:24.000pp space he's doing ccp propaganda and saying ah well america does it too so no biggie now jason
00:08:31.740kenny does say it's a bad thing here he says disappointing to see both canada and the united
00:08:36.500States re-engaging in formal dialogue with the PRC's People's Liberation Army, an enormous tool
00:08:41.640of state oppression and a constant threat to the sovereignty of our Asian allies. Hey, Jason, what0.69
00:08:47.780country out there pays to protect those Asian allies? Who's protecting Vietnam and Cambodia
00:08:55.300and Taiwan and the Philippines and Japan and Korea? Who's doing that? Oh, it's America. It turns out0.85
00:09:04.280we aren't sending any fishing trawlers over there to stop the prc from landing troops on taiwan
00:09:09.620so this whole kind of like well it's kind of a it's kind of a two-headed problem between canada
00:09:15.720the united states no it isn't no it isn't they're also trying to basically push china back on the
00:09:22.480economic world stage at the same time we want to trade more with them and coordinate militarily0.59
00:09:28.260which i guess we're going to start training the troops in winter combat again we just had a0.89
00:09:34.220chinese canadian intern get caught in nato spying for the ccp that just happened remember the lab
00:09:44.260leak of data that happened in winnipeg where basically chinese ccp agents stole a bunch of
00:09:51.480virology data from a lab in winnipeg not a problem maybe we should care a little bit more about this0.55
00:09:57.920the country that had chinese police stations all over it harassing chinese nationals who live in0.95
00:10:04.160canada to escape the ccp maybe we should care about that maybe we should care about that kenny0.96
00:10:10.000maybe this isn't a whataboutism situation that you can just do throw this up in the air and say0.99
00:10:14.520ah who cares it's both no it isn't both because we don't pay for the world security we do not put
00:10:19.700the hypocrisy coins into the machine to pay the hypocrisy tax i don't care what america is saying
00:10:25.980to China. They're paying for the defense of Taiwan. We don't. So maybe we should be a little
00:10:32.400bit more meek on this particular issue and we should maybe take it a little more seriously
00:10:37.480when America does say it's a big sticking point for them that we shouldn't be trading more and
00:10:42.680integrating more with China when we're trying to get a good trade deal. In fact, that's probably1.00
00:10:47.600why we weren't going to get very good rates on steel and aluminum because we insist on keeping
00:10:53.100the Chinese EV dumping mandate and so of course they're going to put they're going to put taxes
00:10:58.340on autos coming from Canada to America. Of course they're going to leave in they're going to leave0.96
00:11:05.200in tariffs on steel and aluminum because those are products that could come from China to slip
00:11:11.140into the United States. It's kind of just sensible. Again I'm not saying I like tariffs. I don't like
00:11:17.800tariffs. I'm saying that they have a logical reason for having a problem with this one.
00:11:23.100Other stuff Trump says and other stuff other Trump officials say, I will say that I disagree with it. It's illogical. I hate when they say we have the best deal, that we were offered the best deal on the planet. Of course, we have the best deal from the perspective that a lot of our goods are allowed to go over the border still tariff-free and other ones are subject to tariffs and other countries have blanket tariffs on all their goods.
00:11:44.320it's still not the best deal simply because we trade with them so much relatively speaking
00:11:49.580when you trade 1% or 2% in terms of your exports with America you can handle a 10% across the
00:11:56.260board or even 15% across the board tariff better than Canada can on part of its goods being tariffed
00:12:01.900heavily and we trade 78% with the United States but I'm just trying to make it clear I absolutely
00:12:08.480judge the situation fairly on this china issue we lose a lot of our moral uh argument that america
00:12:16.720can't push us around when it comes to who we can trade with and who we talk to0.96
00:12:21.600if the khmer rouge were still around would we be trading with them would we be trading with
00:12:27.320north korea right now the islamic regime in iran equatorial guinea you know if leopold's
00:12:34.360congo was still around would we be traded trading with them probably not it's almost like we
00:12:40.920understand the concept between good country bad country would canada be arguing we want to trade
00:12:46.040with russia and fund their military why can't we do that obviously every single one of these
00:12:51.260excuse makers for the carny liberals would say well obviously that's too far what's so different
00:12:56.520with china they fund iran they fund russia they are currently trying to interfere in our elections
00:13:02.840and yet we can militarily coordinate with them and we can trade more with them and america can't say0.89
00:13:08.760boo about it even though they pay the stopping china from taking over the the world tax stopping
00:13:14.920xi jinping from being the president of all of asia tax they do that by the way we don't and yet we're0.94
00:13:22.680sitting around like thumbing our nose at the u.s and saying you can't tell us who we can be friends
00:13:26.520with that's kind of the point of a negotiation telling one side what you think they should be
00:13:32.000doing and what you want from them in return like you know you want something from them and they
00:13:36.940might want something from you in return that's negotiations you are trying to get the other side
00:13:41.380to do something they otherwise may not have done unless you demanded it and maybe offer them
00:13:46.200something in exchange or threaten something if they don't but what do i do i'm not mark carney
00:13:52.180i'm not the genius mark carney who believes that canada's sovereignty is going to be secured with
00:13:58.120communist China. Whatever. Okay. Like, share, and subscribe, guys. I'll see you all later.