00:00:35I thought I'd start by talking about something that is a bit...
00:00:38I saw the clip by Dave Chappelle saying that he was happy over Charlie Kirk's murder.
00:00:48I saw what's going on with Vivek Ramaswamy and all of that stuff.
00:00:52and his selection as someone who's deeply seemingly very resentful of normal Americans0.64
00:01:00and the rise of the Islamic bloc in the United States with Al-Sayed.0.82
00:01:07And I thought I'd ask you about race relations in the United States
00:01:12and what does the midterm say about them and what do election results say about them
00:01:19and where do you see this whole thing going?
00:01:21I mean, officially, people acknowledge the failure of multiculturalism. Angela Merkel said it in Germany in 2015, I think, or even earlier. Even the conservatives said that multiculturalism is a failure. But you guys seem wedded to it in a particular way.
00:01:42there's of course the story that has been told about the united states to the past past few
00:01:51generations and that story is that america is a nation of immigrants of course jfk uh john f
00:01:59kennedy uh first wrote this book and introduced this idea into the united states in league with
00:02:05the adl uh there was a worry that there was a large amount of anti-immigrant sentiment and
00:02:10that this affected many groups, including both Catholics and Jews. And so that there would be
00:02:16more of an acceptance of these growing minorities. I mean, you know, there had been Catholics in the
00:02:21United States, and to some extent, Jews, almost since the founding, there had been a smattering
00:02:26of Jews and, you know, different colonies, different areas of Catholics. But the numbers,
00:02:31especially post Hartzellar, exploded after JFK's death. And so we saw the rise of these groups.
00:02:38And the idea was that if we understood America as a nation of immigrants, something that was forming at the time, rather than something that had an established identity, that that would somehow ease this transition.
00:02:50And it's not the first time this has been sold.
00:02:52Teddy Roosevelt had to grapple with this question.
00:02:55This is when the phrase the melting pot was introduced into popular American understandings.
00:03:01Now, at that time, even though Teddy Roosevelt kind of toyed with this popular idea, he ultimately rejected it for the more classic Anglo-American assimilationist view where America is an Anglo-Protestant country that other groups, especially European groups, can eventually assimilate to over time.
00:03:23But the assimilation to that Anglo-Protestant understanding was critical.
00:03:27So again, this wasn't the first time that we had really took a swing at kind of mixing up that identity
00:03:33However, that really took hold in the 50s and 60s and has been what everybody was raised on today
00:03:40And so you have this difficult moment where conservatives can see the reality
00:12:04The idea that you could have a European country and the people could identify itself and be proud of itself and organize around its own interests, that will trigger another Holocaust, another world war, another great band who will sweep across the world and kill millions of people.0.84
00:12:21And so, therefore, all these Western countries must be diversified in order to avoid this inevitable outcome.0.86
00:12:34I mean, with the midterms, let's sort of pivot to that a little bit.0.99
00:12:44Is it unfair to diagnose the problem as being Israel, starting with the Epstein files, ending with the Iran war?
00:12:55Is it unfair to characterize that as the main problem with the Trump presidency?
00:12:59or is there how did we end up with trump doing what he's doing
00:13:05well i i think israel is a huge factor uh but i think treating anything as monocausal
00:13:12is a mistake and i also think that it lets us off the hook too easily right just saying oh look
00:13:19it's israel um look israel is a country fighting for its own interests that's not itself a problem
00:13:26The problem is when people in the United States conflate Israel's interests with our interests, which is why George Washington ultimately said, do not have these type of alliances, do not have these extended alliances, do not have favored countries because it will produce exactly this result.
00:13:42it will create factionalism it will increase foreign influence people will act as if loyalty
00:13:47to the favored nation is loyalty to america do not do this he warns this emphatically in his
00:13:53farewell address something that every american school child used to have to read we don't read
00:13:56it anymore that's not a not a surprise and it's not a it's not a mistake yes uh so so in some ways
00:14:03yes it is israel uh israel has too much influence in the united states i know this personally
00:14:07There's a lot of money moving around. There's a lot of pressure inside the country to conform to this, especially in the political sphere. If you want to maintain professional relationships, if you want to have influence, you need to play ball with the Israeli lobby. You need to not notice that it is having an outside influence.
00:14:26But at the end of the day, these are America's leaders. And so the fault lies on them. If they are listening to a foreign country, if they are taking foreign money, if they are acquiescing to foreign desires, well, that's ultimately their decision. Right. And so whether or not, you know, Israel's our relationship with Israel is healthy, you should ultimately be able to rely on your leaders to make a decision to cut it off if it is not.
00:14:50And we obviously cannot do that. So I would say, again, contributing factor, even J.D. Vance said this very directly. Obviously, Donald Trump announced the day of the election, we will not be sending any more aid to Israel, which I don't think is going to happen. But he did say that on the day of the election. So clearly, both the president and the vice president understand the nature of the problem. Whether or not something will change is the real question.0.75
00:15:14Yeah, I mean, I saw AIPAC posting that they have that as of the 5th of November, they had 245 candidates that they backed that had won the election. I saw some other assessments that said that actually the number of candidates that have taken AIPAC money is even higher than that. I haven't properly looked into it myself.
00:15:37It just seems that with the Shapiro faction, with the Levin faction of the Republican Party, there is a real crisis.
00:15:50There is a real, I don't know if the word is turning point, but there's a real choice.
00:15:58Because I don't understand how either that faction dominates the GOP or it's kicked out of the GOP.
00:16:07I, I'm struggling to see a middle ground and I was wondering if you could see one.0.51
00:16:14Yeah, I mean, so there are, I think there are people who disagree with perhaps some of some people like us with the level of problem that the current relationship with Israel represents that we could ultimately work with.0.79
00:16:31I think there are people who are who are simply evaluating the relationship between the United States and Israel and for some reason see that as a positive because, you know, it's not Islamic or, you know, something like that.0.98
00:16:43I think there are some people like that who can be convinced.0.91
00:16:46But the truly hard line neocons, the Ben Shapiros, the Mark Levins, these kind of guys.0.56
00:16:51Yeah, it's very clear that ultimately Israel is the only issue.
00:16:57It is the only thing that matters to them.
00:16:59It is the only thing that moves their opinion one way or another.
00:17:02And so for them, the Republican Party is just it's a binary.
00:17:06Either you're pro-Israel or you need to be expelled.
00:17:10And obviously, there's simply no way we can continue to coexist inside the same party for long.
00:17:15Someone's going to win this one and someone's going to lose.
00:17:18And honestly, my bet is going to be on the Israeli skeptical part losing or winning over time.
00:17:25I think that you will see the last gasp of the neocons here, but they have poisoned their brand so thoroughly. I mean, anyone who is not literally paid to ignore this can look at the last election and realize that it was the neocons that lost this election for the Republican Party, them and their priorities and the pressure that they apply on the president and others very clearly.
00:17:46And again, this is not to, you know, give an excuse to Trump or anyone else who made
00:17:51these decisions, but it's very clear that they are the main drivers of this war, that
00:17:55they were the main drivers of this line of thinking.
00:17:58They were the people who decided that, and this is really important, maybe we want to
00:18:02talk about this a little bit, the siloing of the conservative audience when it came
00:18:07to the realities of the war and the political fallout.
00:18:11There was a very hard effort pushed by the neocons on every level to make this
00:18:16war happen absolutely no matter what and obviously they're still pushing it you're still seeing mark
00:18:20levin talk about arming uh you know the persians uh after this so uh they're they're not going to
00:18:26slow down they're not going to stop they're not going to be introspective and so i don't i like
00:18:29you i do not see a future where the hardliners you know the the true neocons can exist in the
00:18:35party i think there are you could probably still have people who have some differing opinions on
00:18:39israel you know work things out ultimately and decide that you know just putting space between
00:18:43us in this country is the right move for the good of the United States. But I certainly don't think0.87
00:18:48you continue to have a Ben Shapiro or a Mark Levin leading the policy discussion. That's simply
00:18:53untenable going forward. Fair enough. I mean, part of the question that I have is that,
00:19:00you know, if you look at Fuentes' assessment of this whole thing, of what Trump was going to do,
00:19:08to transgenderism with parental consent, no new wars except with Iran, tax cuts for corporations,
00:19:20abandoning pretty much the entire agenda. This seems to have been largely fulfilled. And the
00:19:28question that keeps coming to mind is that, was the decision to go to war made before Trump won
00:19:37the presidency or in 2025 and in 2026? This is the question that I'm genuinely struggling with.
00:19:48And I say that because, you know, the answer to that question is pretty consequential.
00:19:55If it was always intended to be some kind of deception, with Trump and Vance mentioning
00:20:03during the campaign, things that people didn't pick up on about Iran and what was going to happen
00:20:11to Iran. Was this the plan or was this the result of immediate pressure during the Trump presidency
00:20:23that led to this war? If you enjoyed this preview, please consider subscribing to
00:20:28lotusutress.com starting for just £5 a month.