The Saad Truth with Dr. Saad - October 01, 2026


Dr. Randy Wayne - Cornell Plant Biologist and Champion of Academic Freedom (The Saad Truth with Dr. Saad_1054)

Hosted by
Mentioned
Problems Between the Two Sexes with Host Jesse Watters (The Saad Truth with Dr. Saad_1053) On the Inefficacy of Sending Dick Pics to Women - Lack of Theory of Mind (The Saad Truth with Dr. Saad_1055)

Episode Stats


Length

58 minutes

Words per minute

139.13

Word count

8,127

Sentence count

488

Harmful content

Toxicity

9

sentences flagged

Hate speech

17

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 I'm delighted to report that I have joined as a visiting professor the Declaration of Independence
00:00:06.200 Center for the Study of American Freedom at the University of Mississippi. The center offers
00:00:12.600 educational opportunities, speakers, internship, and reading groups for the University of Mississippi
00:00:18.580 community. It is named in honor of the United States founding document which constitutes the
00:00:25.640 nation as a political community and expresses fundamental principles of American freedom,
00:00:31.780 including in the recognition of the importance of Judeo-Christian values in shaping American
00:00:37.600 exceptionalism. Dedicated to the academic and open-minded exploration of these principles,
00:00:44.060 the Center exists to encourage exploration into the many facets of freedom. It will sponsor a
00:00:50.940 speaker series, and an interdisciplinary faculty research team. If you'd like to learn more about
00:00:56.840 the center, please visit Ole Miss, that's O-L-E-M-I-S-S dot E-D-U slash independence slash.
00:01:05.980 Hi, everybody. This is Gatsad. Today, I've got a fellow Cornelian straight from Cornell University,
00:01:12.720 which is my alma mater. I was also a visiting professor there for a while. I've got Professor
00:01:18.280 randy wayne a plant biologist at cornell how are you doing randy i'm great and it's so terrific to
00:01:25.740 be on here with you gad oh likewise you know and i don't say this because i'm trying to as they say
00:01:32.280 forgive the spicy term blow smoke up your proverbial behind i rarely have met an academia
00:01:39.820 people that are both truly gentlemen and scholars, but I have the distinct privilege of having
00:01:48.280 you on the show, and you certainly exemplify both.
00:01:51.780 So welcome on the show.
00:01:53.360 This is your inaugural appearance on The Sad Truth.
00:01:55.640 Hopefully, you'll come back many more times.
00:01:59.260 What's going on at Cornell?
00:02:01.280 What is happening, Randy?
00:02:02.740 Tell us about it.
00:02:04.420 Well, okay.
00:02:06.460 Let me let me start with the bad news so we can get past that.
00:02:12.000 And so because I don't know the facts.
00:02:16.340 So there was or was not a rape that occurred in 2024.
00:02:26.960 The first complaint that was filed with the police said that everything was consensual.
00:02:35.060 So we don't know if that was true or not then. And I'm willing to believe it may or may not have been true then. And there's some unknown aspects to me of how Cornell contacted the Ithaca Police Department.
00:02:57.600 Did they share all the information they had or not? It's not clear to me. And the Ithaca Police Department decided that it wasn't a criminal case.
00:03:11.080 So the case that we hear about now was essentially seven men were involved in raping a woman for seven hours.
00:03:23.960 And there's a Snapchat picture of some of the talk that was going on during or next to.
00:03:36.680 And it's not complimentary to anybody.
00:03:39.660 and who knows who had that evidence when.
00:03:45.960 So from what I hear, this is about the biggest story in the country now.
00:03:52.700 And it is horrible.
00:03:57.260 It really is horrible.
00:03:58.340 And I hope actually we get to the truth of it.
00:04:02.680 Of course.
00:04:03.260 And if people need to be punished, so be it.
00:04:07.820 If people need to be exonerated, so be it. Just beforehand, there's no telling. Is it the woman
00:04:17.480 or the man that's not telling the truth? Right. Okay. So that's the, of course, the dreadful 0.98
00:04:25.820 sort of gang rape accusation. But there are other wacky things happening at Cornell.
00:04:32.220 We had Hassan Piker invited to Cornell. We had Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez. I call her Occasional Cortex. She's been invited to Cornell. Now, you and I have discussed previously because of our love and appreciation of Cornell, you're a professor there.
00:04:55.140 I was a doctoral student there and a visiting professor, that, you know, Cornell has gone very much the way of many of the other elite prestigious universities becoming super woke.
00:05:06.720 Is there something unique about Cornell in terms of it platforming these people?
00:05:13.940 Or is this just part and parcel of the realities of the Ivy League?
00:05:19.220 No, I think this is part and parcel of the realities of the Ivy League.
00:05:22.500 and unfortunately and i went to see hassan piker right because i i think i have a different view
00:05:30.740 than many people i think everybody has if somebody's invited to speak they can speak
00:05:39.460 i'm a free speech absolutist in terms of that however i came to i came prepared to ask him a
00:05:47.280 question based on his talk. And he didn't take questions from the audience, because that's where
00:05:53.960 free speech begins to really matter when he says something and is ready to see if perhaps he's in
00:06:01.880 error, which I believe his facts were completely wrong. And I would have liked to hear his
00:06:08.640 explanation. What was, if you don't mind me asking, what was the thing that you were going to post?
00:06:14.040 Yeah. So he talked about how hypocritical and how horrible and how, let me say, hypocritical and horrible the West is, and all the billionaires in the West, particularly. 0.97
00:06:35.540 And so I wanted to ask him, does he see Islam in the same fair light? Has Islam, did they peacefully take over Northern Africa and the Middle East and Europe? And are they continually to peacefully take over England, for example? 0.96
00:07:01.500 So is it a peaceful religion in that terms and not imperialistic, like he says Western culture is?
00:07:10.580 Do the billionaires share their money and build schools in Gaza?
00:07:15.680 I think not. 0.78
00:07:17.420 Just so every criticism he had for the United States, I think you can make the same criticism in spades against Islam. 0.94
00:07:26.660 What would you have predicted would have been his answer?
00:07:29.060 you know i didn't predict that he would be too cowardly to take questions right so um i guessed
00:07:39.080 he would have just um brushed it aside brushed it aside yes thank you and um because i can't
00:07:47.800 imagine i can't even imagine um what an answer could be an honest answer well i'm going to give
00:07:54.640 you a few that he would likely say you're ready yes uh any manifestation of so-called violence
00:08:02.040 that islam might be accused of it's only because they were taking a defensive strategy against
00:08:09.680 you know american imperialism and therefore so for example october 7th itself from his
00:08:17.340 perspective would have been perfectly justified because you've got these noble peaceful freedom
00:08:22.720 fighters that have been under a open border open air prison where there's a daily genocide being
00:08:30.440 committed against them and so is it not natural for them to then go and gang rape 1200 people and 0.53
00:08:36.660 chop off their heads because those babies ultimately are going to in the future be 0.98
00:08:40.900 you know evil zionists and so i think that there's almost no amount of evidence that you could have 0.96
00:08:47.400 offered in the prelude to your question that could have unshaken his belief that America bad, 0.89
00:08:54.640 Islam good. But maybe I'm wrong. Gee, you almost had me convinced. 0.57
00:09:00.320 Because I've had so much experience dealing with those dishonest interlocutors that I could almost
00:09:07.700 predict with my eyes closed exactly what they're going to say. They truly are impenetrable to
00:09:14.420 reason to evidence to to anything that we might call logical okay so and then did you did you get
00:09:19.860 a chance to did you have the distinct pleasure to also hear the pontification of uh alexandra
00:09:26.460 cortez no i did i i saw her on tv but i didn't go you didn't go to her rally hassan was enough
00:09:33.920 for you you couldn't have plenty that's uh all right so let's let's so i want to tell people
00:09:40.180 how we originally met uh you and i had been invited we had gone to uh stanford for a conference
00:09:48.920 on academic freedom in 2022 and i think we were on a bus that would take us from the hotel to the
00:09:57.600 venue we sat next to each other and we started talking about all kinds of things i think if i
00:10:02.000 remember correctly we mentioned our mutual admiration for evil wilson is it okay there's
00:10:09.200 some light? My light's on a timer. So let me, I can't control. Here we go. Oh, okay. All right.
00:10:17.800 Yeah. So, so we, I think we spoke a bit about E.O. Wilson. We spoke maybe a bit about evolution
00:10:23.060 in general, but, and maybe I think you had mentioned very briefly, I'm not sure if I
00:10:28.320 understood all the intricacies about your specialization in, in, in your academic research.
00:10:34.640 And you mentioned the very long specialization term. Let's see if I can remember, if I can get 100% on the exam, Professor Wayne. You are a biophysical plant cell biologist that I-
00:10:52.280 A plus.
00:10:53.240 Thank God.
00:10:54.300 100% on the final exam. All right. Unpack that for us. I have a sense of what plant biology
00:11:03.040 might mean. How do we apply physics to it? Without getting into too many technical details,
00:11:09.020 because obviously we have a general audience, tell us what keeps you up in your academic work.
00:11:14.860 Yeah. So I choose to work on single cells as opposed to larger organisms,
00:11:22.200 because I want to choose the simplest system that represents life.
00:11:27.120 So an amoeba would be one.
00:11:28.720 So an amoeba would be one.
00:11:29.920 I work on a single cell of CARA to study gravity,
00:11:37.040 work on a single cell of Donaliella to study light,
00:11:41.560 or a single cell of those are two algae, or fern spores.
00:11:48.060 so um i try to reduce the complications by by starting with organisms actually that are single
00:11:56.860 cells they're both organisms and single cells and the fact that the fact that you're studying
00:12:02.640 gravity and light that's where the physics comes in you are going to now be applying
00:12:08.840 physics-based principles to study these biological organisms is that roughly correct
00:12:14.120 Yes. Actually, I can give an example of that. So inside plant cells, there's starch grains, the things that add weight to us. And those starch grains are thought to fall down when you turn a cell from horizontal to vertical. And when they hit the bottom of the cell, that causes the cell to say, okay, that's the bottom, and the other side must be the top.
00:12:42.180 However, if you calculate the energy in a falling starch grain, there's not enough energy to actually do anything.
00:12:51.640 It's a million times two less.
00:12:53.760 The water molecules hitting any receptor have a million times more energy than this falling starch grain.
00:13:01.720 And it actually doesn't fall like this.
00:13:04.960 Like a feather falling, sort of.
00:13:07.840 Pretty much, because the cytoplasma is very, very viscous.
00:13:12.180 So, it does fall like a feather.
00:13:15.600 Like a feather through air, these starch grains fall through cytoplasm.
00:13:20.180 And so, I said there must be another way that they're sensing gravity.
00:13:27.200 So, I chose to work on cells that actually don't have starch grains to begin with.
00:13:34.000 And so, those are the carousels.
00:13:38.400 And if you irradiate the ends of the cells, they won't sense gravity.
00:13:44.700 They're normal in every other way, but they won't sense gravity.
00:13:48.600 And if you put the cells in a medium that's very dense, the protoplasm will actually go up instead of falling down.
00:13:59.500 So it's like you in water versus you in air.
00:14:02.960 and when you put the protoplasm in a dense medium it actually thinks that that's down
00:14:09.520 and this is up right so it senses the opposite so we've done some work on the photoreceptors
00:14:17.380 that i mean the receptors that are involved in sensing gravity what they bind to in the wall
00:14:23.520 just outside the membrane we use electrical methods to see what they may be doing once they
00:14:31.320 sense gravity and that's that's the biophysical part and is does does that sensorial mechanism of
00:14:38.660 you know sensing gravity what are the downstream consequences as a function of how the cell senses
00:14:45.620 gravity it then orients itself in the appropriate manner for mobility for like what's the mechanism
00:14:53.540 that is important once I'm able to sense gravity or not?
00:14:58.920 What's important is that the roots go down
00:15:04.160 and the shoots go up.
00:15:07.600 If it did the opposite, that's the end of the plant.
00:15:11.320 The roots won't find nutrients and water
00:15:13.320 and the top of the plant won't find sun for photosynthesis.
00:15:18.520 Got it.
00:15:18.980 And now in your work,
00:15:21.140 because i mentioned in the introduction that we had you know briefly talked about eo wilson who
00:15:26.140 is obviously an avowed evolutionist we talked about evolutionary theory
00:15:29.800 as you probably know there's a distinction in well in by for any biological phenomenon
00:15:37.380 between proximate and ultimate explanations right the proximate are the how and what of a phenomenon
00:15:43.860 the ultimate i'm not explaining this to you i'm explaining it for our audience and then the
00:15:49.120 ultimate is the darwinian why why would that phenomenon have evolved to be of that form and
00:15:54.880 you really need both levels of explanations to fully explain a biological phenomenon when i hear
00:16:02.620 you speaking i i hear you navigating in proximate world you're explaining the mechanisms does that
00:16:11.300 mean that you can do your work completely bereft of the ultimate lens or does the ultimate lens
00:16:19.040 still inform your proximate stuff?
00:16:23.700 Actually, you asked one of the most interesting questions in the world.
00:16:26.820 Oh, wow.
00:16:27.220 And that is, what's the relationship of the part to the whole?
00:16:31.320 Right.
00:16:32.460 And I'm really working on the laws of nature on these things.
00:16:37.260 And there's two ways to get to the laws of nature,
00:16:39.860 sort of building bricks up little bit by little bit from the foundation.
00:16:44.260 or say the law came from above, but that's a little hard to work with in the lab.
00:16:52.500 So how can we look at it from a systems approach?
00:16:58.660 So the systems approach gives it meaning so that anybody should be able to understand
00:17:04.940 and that the scientists themselves should be able to understand it better.
00:17:10.700 So I think the telos is important.
00:17:12.540 I think when science said, let's not look at purpose and telos, it was a mistake.
00:17:18.040 Right.
00:17:19.540 But in fact, my proximal interest is working on the proximal causes, that the Gravi receptor senses a certain amount of tension on the top and compression on the bottom.
00:17:34.480 And there's enough energy in that to open a calcium channel.
00:17:39.480 But that's as far as we've gotten, essentially.
00:17:42.540 Are you able to, and before I even ask my question, I don't mean to imply that for basic scientific research to have value, we have to somehow find an application to the human condition, but I'm someone who, as you know, thinks very synthetically, where can I build bridges?
00:18:03.460 How can I create consilience, to use E.O. Wilson's famous term?
00:18:08.920 Are you able to take, even if it's in the abstract, even though you may not have done
00:18:14.260 it yet, are you able to take some of the insights based on, stemming from your basic research
00:18:20.420 and say, here is a trajectory where I see this having some application to the human
00:18:26.380 context?
00:18:28.920 Okay, stop me if I get too long here.
00:18:31.920 Okay, go ahead.
00:18:32.820 Okay. And so I'm going to take this from how cells sense light to can Elon Musk get to Mars?
00:18:43.800 Wow, that's a big one. Okay, go.
00:18:45.900 So, all right. So the physicists make three assumptions right from the beginning. Assume
00:18:54.460 that there's no friction, assume that elementary particles are mathematical points, and time goes
00:19:03.000 forward and backwards. So, those three assumptions, I just can't buy as a biologist. So, for example,
00:19:13.740 if when a nerve fires, ions move through the channels, and the ions move through the channels
00:19:23.040 such that their velocity is proportional to the force,
00:19:27.840 that is, the current is proportional to the voltage.
00:19:31.100 So it's the velocity that's proportional to the force,
00:19:34.620 not the acceleration, which is Newton's second law.
00:19:38.320 Right.
00:19:38.880 And that means that there's friction.
00:19:40.780 As the ions go through, they hit things.
00:19:43.240 So they go, stop, go, stop.
00:19:45.880 So actually, they go at constant velocity on the average.
00:19:52.380 So, or when chromosomes are going to the pole, if you stop the motor, they don't just glide a little bit, they just stop.
00:20:01.820 So, I have to introduce friction into the way I look at things.
00:20:08.900 Secondly, the physicists say that elementary particles are mathematical points.
00:20:16.360 And when Robert Hooke began using a microscope in 1665,
00:20:21.060 he thought he should begin as a geometer.
00:20:23.760 So he looked at a point, and he stuck a needle under the microscope.
00:20:27.860 But he saw the tip of that microscope wasn't much of a point.
00:20:31.500 It was very, very blunt.
00:20:33.860 So I think when you say an elementary particle is a mathematical point,
00:20:39.860 maybe it's a good first assumption, but it's something you should get past.
00:20:45.800 And the third thing is that assuming time goes forward and backwards.
00:20:52.620 Okay, I've just never experienced it.
00:20:55.840 So I think maybe there could be another way to introduce that negative sign for positive time and negative sign.
00:21:05.500 And that other thing that I do is I allow for negative mass.
00:21:11.920 So I do three things.
00:21:14.400 allow for friction, make elementary particles a little bit bigger than a mathematical point,
00:21:21.660 and only allow time to go in one direction, which allows those particles to have negative mass.
00:21:28.640 So the difference between matter and antimatter in standard physics is if you change, if you
00:21:38.440 start with matter. You change the charge. You reverse it. So positive to negative or negative
00:21:44.260 to positive. You change the parity, which means the direction it's spinning. Although it's not
00:21:51.000 actually spinning because it's a point and a point can't spin. So the quantum mechanics people,
00:21:55.160 there's just a number. There's nothing there to understand, but I allow things to spin.
00:22:00.080 And the third thing that antimatter is matter that goes backwards in time.
00:22:05.160 So since I only allow time to go in one direction, I have to say antimatter is matter that has negative mass.
00:22:13.360 So negative mass is like your kids.
00:22:16.540 When you're pulling them, say, you got to go to the dentist, they sort of go in the other direction against the force.
00:22:24.840 So it's actually an allowed concept in physics, but it's not appreciated very much.
00:22:32.020 so um so to pull this back to um i worked on how cells sense light but when biology got rid of the
00:22:43.220 logos in biology they wanted to get rid of the academic sound but they really did at the same
00:22:49.020 time get in my field get rid of the logos the meaning the reason the word and turned it into
00:22:57.680 omics, which sounds more like economics. And you've heard of genomics, transcriptomics.
00:23:04.620 So instead of looking at one, two, or three variables at a time, they're looking at 40,000
00:23:10.260 variables at a time. And there's actually no way to do those controls. So the way to succeed
00:23:18.400 in an experiment is just to be incredibly lucky. And you get that one gene that may
00:23:24.560 cure disease or feed the world. But most of the work, I think it doesn't help us understand the
00:23:34.280 world at all. So anyhow, I went from how cells perceive light and sense and respond to light
00:23:44.840 to what is light itself. So I've made a model of the photon based on changing these three
00:23:52.940 assumptions. And I can tell you the experiments I did at another time. So I come up with a photon
00:24:00.520 that's made out of two particles, one particle of matter, one particle of antimatter. So one has a
00:24:07.940 positive mass, one has a negative mass. So the sum of the two masses is zero. So it's a massless
00:24:13.860 particle. And when you apply Newton's gravitational law to positive and negative mass, you find out
00:24:21.000 the positive mass runs away from the negative mass, and the negative mass chases it. So, in fact,
00:24:29.100 if you were ever to ask anybody, why does light move, they wouldn't have an answer, because that
00:24:36.380 mathematical point can't do anything. But actually, the gravitational force makes the light move.
00:24:43.020 So, the positive particle moves, and the negative catches up. And actually, like a slinky, you can
00:24:49.320 see the particles and the wave. You don't have to say light's a particle on Monday, Wednesdays,
00:24:55.640 and Fridays, and a wave on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays. Those particles also, because they
00:25:02.180 have extension, also rotate. And that rotation gives them a certain amount of angular momentum,
00:25:09.680 which describes the polarization of light and other physical properties. But let's get back
00:25:16.340 to something that's useful, the Elon Musk.
00:25:18.300 Yeah, I was waiting for the Elon Musk.
00:25:20.120 Now, so we have these particles that are moving and moving.
00:25:25.000 Now, light can exert a force.
00:25:27.680 It has linear momentum.
00:25:30.140 And so if you can isolate the two particles of matter and antimatter,
00:25:38.700 which is just as difficult in space as isolating hydrogen and oxygen
00:25:43.920 to have them fuse um but if you can do that you essentially have an endless source of
00:25:51.880 very high and high powered energy or hence the power intergalactic travel i see yeah so the
00:25:59.580 trouble is making enough matter and antimatter um that you can now let come together and um
00:26:06.940 cause a force very interesting so as you were talking about the tension between what the
00:26:13.680 physicists are using as their sort of three you know assumptions versus what you are describing
00:26:20.720 in in the actual real world it reminds me of the tension say in economics where economists will
00:26:29.020 build these theoretical models so the black box now the black box might descriptively be invalid
00:26:38.620 In other words, it doesn't accurately describe human behavior. So, for example, homo economicus, the definition of what constitutes an axiom of rational choice that the classical economist says that we should be adhering to, is not adhered to, hence the work of Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky.
00:27:00.400 But then the economist will say, I don't care that the descriptive validity of the black box is wrong, because I simply care about being able to predict behavior at higher than random chance level.
00:27:15.360 So is that the exact same tension that is happening with the physicist and what you're saying?
00:27:20.620 He's saying, I want to achieve a theoretical parsimony, a coherent, elegant thing.
00:27:27.240 I don't really care whether it is descriptively valid.
00:27:31.180 It sounds to me like the two are analogous.
00:27:33.380 Am I right or am I off?
00:27:36.440 You're right.
00:27:37.340 But it's even more and has little to do with free speech.
00:27:40.320 Okay.
00:27:42.460 So can you imagine here's two electric plates?
00:27:48.380 This one is negatively charged and this is positively charged.
00:27:51.880 And you're going to press a switch that's going to make a current flow
00:27:54.800 from the negative side to the positive side.
00:27:57.240 so the electrons are going to flow. The longer you press that switch, the faster the electrons
00:28:03.940 are going to go. They're going to accelerate. And if you do it for eight hours, they'll accelerate
00:28:11.800 linearly. Another eight hours, well, maybe they'll slow down a little, as if you only work for seven
00:28:17.980 hours. And then the next eight hours, well, maybe they'll accelerate just a little bit, like you
00:28:24.560 only work for seven seconds, et cetera, et cetera. So you see a curve of acceleration of velocity
00:28:30.720 that looks like this. And those electrons asymptote at the speed of light. So what
00:28:39.240 Einstein says, each of those electrons has a little watch, and the faster it goes, the slower
00:28:45.820 the watch goes. So it was not going that fast in the beginning. So you said you worked eight hours,
00:28:52.600 it said you worked eight hours. But the next set of eight hours, it thought you only worked for
00:28:57.300 seven hours. And then for seven seconds, et cetera, et cetera. So it only accelerated what
00:29:05.120 it thought was appropriate for how long it thought you worked. And that's what actually everybody
00:29:10.040 believes. So Einstein only had two free parameters he can use to model this, that space and time.
00:29:19.740 But as a biologist, I know that everything that moves, moves through something.
00:29:27.040 So I ask, what are those electrons moving through?
00:29:31.200 And actually, right now in front of you, surrounding you, surrounding me, is a black body distribution of photons.
00:29:39.720 Planck's black body distribution of photons.
00:29:42.480 So those photons are surrounding it.
00:29:45.340 The photons that hit the front of the electron actually push the electron back a little bit.
00:29:50.940 The ones that hit the back push it forward a little bit.
00:29:54.960 So you have the ones that hit the side push it to the side.
00:29:59.820 The electron actually moves by Brownian motion.
00:30:02.800 If it wasn't moving, it would move like this.
00:30:06.580 And Robert Brown was a botanist, discovered it when he was looking at pollination and the pollen grains broke at his microscope.
00:30:13.620 and Einstein did his PhD thesis on Brownian motion.
00:30:18.380 So again, there's a botany phys.
00:30:20.060 Oh, no, let me turn a little light on.
00:30:23.020 Okay, so I've been demolishing my lab
00:30:29.660 to renovate the buildings.
00:30:31.320 So I got moved into this room,
00:30:33.420 which is actually incredible for the experiments I'm doing,
00:30:36.420 except it has that light feature.
00:30:39.940 Okay, so, but when the electron's moving,
00:30:43.080 It will see the light that comes towards it as being Doppler-shifted, so of a higher frequency.
00:30:49.360 So it'll push it back more, just like an ambulance coming towards you.
00:30:53.940 That sounds higher frequency.
00:30:56.100 And the photons that hit the back of the electron will be red-shifted, so they'll hit it less frequently.
00:31:04.200 So if you add up those two forces, what it makes is a drag force or a viscous force
00:31:09.640 that goes in the opposite direction of the electron.
00:31:13.980 And the faster the electron goes,
00:31:15.880 the bigger this force slows it down.
00:31:19.920 So what you have is light itself
00:31:23.280 prevents the electron from going faster
00:31:26.040 than the speed of light.
00:31:28.300 So I thought that was pretty good.
00:31:30.100 And the equations work out to be the same
00:31:32.400 as the Lorentz transformation,
00:31:34.240 all the relativity equations,
00:31:36.240 except you're just saying the light
00:31:37.960 is what's slowing down the electron, not time and space getting warped.
00:31:43.280 So I went to David Merman, who's taught special relativity here for 50 years.
00:31:48.920 And I said, I got something that I'd like to run by you.
00:31:53.220 And I ran it by.
00:31:54.920 He said, wow, that's great.
00:31:58.840 I never thought of that before.
00:32:02.160 Drop it instantly, because special relativity is so good,
00:32:05.940 and Einstein's so wonderful.
00:32:07.960 and then he stopped talking with me.
00:32:11.360 Yikes.
00:32:13.360 So he succumbed, and we'll come back to this.
00:32:16.220 So he succumbed to the Semmelweis reflex.
00:32:20.400 Yes.
00:32:22.160 We'll talk about that in a second.
00:32:23.640 He washed his hands of me.
00:32:26.960 Well played, sir.
00:32:29.360 For those of you who are wondering what we're talking about,
00:32:32.280 if you missed the reference, we'll unpack it in a second.
00:32:35.080 Okay, but finish your point.
00:32:36.100 And so your relationship is broken.
00:32:40.920 Yes.
00:32:41.740 And then I started working on general relativity.
00:32:45.860 So I'll explain it kind of the same way I just did.
00:32:50.580 So if you have a photon of starlight going by sun, the sun will bend it.
00:32:55.540 The mass of the sun will bend it.
00:32:58.040 So the telescope tilts this way, and you look and you see the star here displaced.
00:33:05.040 And Einstein predicted that the displacement would be twice as big
00:33:09.480 as someone who used Newton's laws to predict the displacement.
00:33:14.640 So I want to say, if the photon itself had infinite translational energy,
00:33:22.280 it would never be bent by the sun.
00:33:24.960 If it had no translational energy, it would fall into the sun.
00:33:29.040 So the fact that you get this double bending may mean it only has half the translational energy than you expect it to have.
00:33:40.460 So what's the other possible energy?
00:33:43.020 And I'd say that's rotational energy because the photon is actually rotating.
00:33:49.260 And that gives the exact same results as the warping of space-time.
00:33:55.980 But you just have normal space and normal time. So when I started working on that, I actually got blacklisted from the archive that's founded here at Cornell. So I wrote to the two professors that oversee it. I say, I don't want to be wrong. So how about if I take you out for a cup of coffee and you tell me why I'm wrong?
00:34:17.820 and they didn't answer. I wrote back one more time to be polite, just in case, you know,
00:34:25.040 they were too busy when they got the email. But again, no answer. So actually, the relativity
00:34:31.280 and quantum mechanics crowd is where I cut my teeth for learning about free speech.
00:34:38.000 I was just going to say, actually, because as you're sort of describing this, I was going to
00:34:44.160 ask you is this where you then suddenly realize oh there are some academic freedom issues here
00:34:51.580 that i might want to get involved so that you just answered that question so so you started
00:34:56.840 with the classic sort of semelweiss reflex and let me mention for those of you don't know semelweiss
00:35:03.020 is some by the way our esteemed guest today is cited in suicidal empathy uh precisely because
00:35:12.700 as you and I were geeking out over all kinds of topics
00:35:16.620 when you kindly invited me to deliver some lectures at Cornell,
00:35:20.380 we talked about Samuel Weiss, and then you mentioned, I think it was
00:35:24.260 Kurt Vonnegut, right, who
00:35:28.240 gave some commencement speech. It was about
00:35:32.460 Samuel Weiss and so on. Samuel Weiss, by the way, is the gentleman who, the physician
00:35:36.660 who basically argued that the fever
00:35:40.880 that new, you know, women who had just given birth, they were dying of this perperal fever
00:35:47.820 was due to the fact that the physicians who were, you know, delivering the babies had previously
00:35:53.660 worked on, you know, doing autopsies. And of course, all of the physicians said, how dare you,
00:36:00.240 sir? How dare you question our God-like abilities in healing? Surely we can't be the culprits.
00:36:08.220 And he was shunned, he was hated, and so on. And then eventually, it turns out that he was right. And so when you earlier said, I wash my hands of him, you're referring to that. So okay, so that was your original foray into the world that I have inhabited for a long time. But then did you extend it to broader issues beyond the academic debate stuff?
00:36:35.100 I, you know, I grew up in Boston, and the American Revolution was just part of me. And all those things, I'm thrilled that this year is the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence.
00:36:51.860 And liberty, freedom, the First Amendment, everything it means, discussions about how do you best serve freedom and prevent hurt at the same time, but in a legal way, consistent with the First Amendment and its interpretation.
00:37:14.960 I just love this stuff.
00:37:16.880 I just, I'm a real patriot and proudly.
00:37:22.460 So you must, if I can shamelessly plug my current center,
00:37:28.360 as you know, Randy, I recently joined
00:37:31.460 the Declaration of Independence Center
00:37:33.860 for the Study of American Freedom at Ole Miss.
00:37:36.900 So we maybe need to invite you down here
00:37:41.100 if we've got the necessary funding
00:37:42.940 for you to talk about how what started off as a standard academic fight between competing camps
00:37:50.480 led you down and you know the foray of the broader issues of freedom yes yes beautiful yes uh do you
00:38:00.700 have hope i mean you and i have discussed you know certainly some of my work parasitic freedom
00:38:06.380 So it's out of empathy and so on. Do you have hope that the universities can be purged of this nonsense and we can return to the edifices of reason? Or are you of sort of the more cataclysmic band? We need to nuke the rotting bodies and start afresh. Where do you stand on that debate?
00:38:27.220 You know, the reason I have hope is the Cornell Library has actually let me research everything that I think about right down to the original document.
00:38:42.100 So I so love this library.
00:38:45.940 Yeah.
00:38:46.700 I used to go there, by the way.
00:38:48.220 Forgive me for interrupting you.
00:38:49.260 When, you know, at the time, you know, I did my Cornell PhD from 90 to 94.
00:38:55.340 there wasn't yet you couldn't access things online and so on and so i would go to those archives and
00:39:01.620 i would just sit there for i mean oftentimes i wasn't searching for something in particular
00:39:07.020 i would just see whatever journal of abnormal psychology and here i go for the next four hours
00:39:13.660 looking through the stuff there is something truly magical about sort of inhabiting the ecosystem of
00:39:19.900 a really powerful library, but go ahead.
00:39:22.460 Oh, I so agree.
00:39:24.040 So although I became a pariah to the library,
00:39:28.600 I take my class to the rare manuscript collection
00:39:32.180 every semester because what I talk about
00:39:36.900 in terms of texts really become real for them
00:39:41.100 when they can hold it themselves.
00:39:42.760 When they read the first edition
00:39:44.600 of The Origin of Species from 1859.
00:39:48.360 You've got one at Cornell?
00:39:49.900 Oh, yes. We have several, actually.
00:39:52.760 Wow.
00:39:52.960 So when you're here next time, we'll go.
00:39:54.980 Yes, please.
00:39:56.960 So actually, in that first, in Origin of Species, Darwin talks about the slave-making instinct of ants.
00:40:05.620 And I give a lecture called Charles Darwin, Samuel Wilberforce, and How We See the Color of Ants.
00:40:11.760 So Samuel Wilberforce wrote a review of the origin of species, and he said, nobody can describe nature like Darwin can.
00:40:27.240 For example, any quotes Darwin, there's the red clover, and the nectar is very deep in the red clover.
00:40:33.600 So you need an insect that has a long proboscis to pollinate it.
00:40:38.740 And that insect is the humble bee.
00:40:41.200 So before the early 1900s, when Beatrix Potter made the Humblebee Goes Buzz and called it the bumblebee, it used to be called the Humblebee.
00:40:51.440 Oh, wow.
00:40:51.920 So the Humblebee is now pollinating the red clover.
00:40:55.880 The more Humblebees you have, the more red clover.
00:40:58.940 But mice happen to love to eat the nests of Humblebees.
00:41:03.540 So if there's too many mice, then you don't have enough humblebees, and the red clover's population goes kaput.
00:41:12.480 But if you're near a city, there's cats.
00:41:15.260 So Darwin writes all about this, and it's beautiful.
00:41:19.160 And then he goes on to other behaviors, like the slave-making instinct of ants. 0.77
00:41:25.360 So there's some species of ants that are not black that have slaves.
00:41:32.240 The masters actually, by themselves, would never feed themselves.
00:41:37.160 They would never feed their larvae.
00:41:40.480 They have a slave that will feed them.
00:41:45.740 Even when they move to another nest, the slave puts them in the jaws and moves them to another place.
00:41:52.580 The only thing that the master ants do is hunt for slaves. 0.97
00:42:01.240 And Darwin has a line in there, the slaves are black. They're always black, no matter what color 0.98
00:42:08.240 the masters are. So now Samuel Wilberforce has an interest in thinking about slavery. So at the time, 0.73
00:42:18.500 he was thinking if this scientific theory was solid enough, then that would justify slavery,
00:42:25.980 especially since Darwin thought that psychology would be replaced by biology
00:42:31.760 and we would inherit the instincts of lower organisms.
00:42:38.080 So Wilberforce looked at Darwin's scientific evidence in terms of the fossil record
00:42:43.400 in terms of forming new species.
00:42:47.760 He didn't believe in the progressivism part of Darwinian evolution,
00:42:52.760 that things keep getting better.
00:42:54.000 He believed in compensation, that if you made, for example, a dog go faster, he wouldn't be so strong.
00:43:03.500 Or if you made a dog stronger, like a bulldog compared to a greyhound, the fast one won't be strong and the strong one won't be fast.
00:43:12.980 So he believed not in always improving, but compensation.
00:43:16.900 conversation so um i asked my students so why was samuel wilberforce so interested in this
00:43:25.740 it turns out his father was william wilberforce a member and i asked my students actually a week
00:43:32.060 before the class does anybody know the name wilberforce a question my amy you know my wife
00:43:38.080 amy great question amy asked me 15 years ago which got this whole lecture going wow so um
00:43:46.040 No, nobody knows Wilberforce. Okay, so now I tell them about William Wilberforce was
00:43:53.640 Samuel Wilberforce's father. He spent his whole life in Parliament to get two bills passed,
00:44:01.060 one to abolish the slave trade, and the others to abolish slavery in the British Empire.
00:44:07.620 So he decided he was going to do that when he realized he was just being like any other
00:44:13.220 politician and not, you know, just taking the perks, that he really should do something
00:44:17.780 important. And he remembered hearing John Newton speak when he was younger, and he went to see
00:44:26.700 John Newton. So John Newton was a slave trader, a captain of a slave ship, and a very good one or
00:44:32.420 a very bad one, depending on your outlook. But one day he thought all men are created in God's
00:44:38.960 image. And if that's true, slavery is wrong. So he quit. He went back to England, became a pastor
00:44:45.160 in the Anglican Church and wrote hymns. One hymn was about his own life. It's called Amazing Grace.
00:44:51.760 I once was lost and now I'm found. And so as a matter of fact, I have the complete works of
00:45:01.000 John Newton. Actually, I have him right here. I just gave that lecture. And I have my students
00:45:07.120 read the hymn and it's the place goes silent it's just amazing although last year last spring i had
00:45:15.080 a student no more hi no more if you're watching uh that sang an amazing grace as she was reading
00:45:22.280 um so um i mean that speaks to your to the term that we mentioned briefly earlier consilience
00:45:32.660 Right. Because you're you're taking all of these evolutionary principles, linking them to real historical phenomena, including slavery, linking it to a spiritual narrative and all of those bridges that you are building to to otherwise connect these disparate phenomena is exactly what the beauty of consilience is.
00:45:54.520 right? Yes, yes. So let me connect it a little more. So I take my class to see, you know,
00:46:02.020 the original origin of species and a number of other things that really are amazing.
00:46:08.340 And there used to always be a bust of Abraham Lincoln right next to the room where we met.
00:46:14.400 And one day it was missing. And I asked somebody, what happened to the bust of Abraham Lincoln?
00:46:20.800 And that person said, someone complained, and it was gone.
00:46:25.840 Oh, no.
00:46:26.540 I knew that that's where we were going.
00:46:28.320 Okay, go on.
00:46:29.340 Okay.
00:46:29.880 So I thought, this is crazy.
00:46:33.140 You know, if anybody has freed more slaves than Abraham Lincoln, I'm willing to listen
00:46:38.660 to their point that Abe should be canceled.
00:46:41.160 But other than short of that, I'm not.
00:46:43.720 So I really fought to bring back the bust of Abraham Lincoln.
00:46:48.580 It's an incredible bust. 1.00
00:46:50.680 It was done by Vinnie Rean, a poor female. 0.94
00:46:56.840 And she had a friend that knew Abraham Lincoln. 0.56
00:46:59.480 And she asked the friend, do you think Abraham Lincoln would sit for me?
00:47:03.220 And Abraham Lincoln said to her friend, I'll sit for her.
00:47:07.320 I don't know why she wants to sculpt me.
00:47:09.660 I'm so homely. 0.93
00:47:10.380 But because she was poor and female, Abraham Lincoln sat for her. 0.86
00:47:15.360 Wow.
00:47:16.340 So she sculpted him, made this beautiful sculpture.
00:47:23.100 You can see it online at the Cornell Library.
00:47:26.760 And it was the last sitting, last live sitting that Abraham Lincoln did before he was assassinated.
00:47:40.300 Incredible.
00:47:40.980 How did Cornell, what's the, do you know the genesis of why Cornell?
00:47:45.180 got it so Ezra Cornell knows knew both Abraham Lincoln and went to one of the inaugurals I'm not
00:47:52.340 sure and Vinnie Rehm and I believe um that in our founder's room the two sculptures of Ezra Cornell
00:48:01.580 and his wife were also done by Vinnie Rehm amazing uh yes so it's beautiful so in this
00:48:09.040 bust abraham lincoln sort of looking to the right um and down and it's whichever side you
00:48:16.220 look at him there's a different feeling it is beautifully done and it's the same like i said
00:48:23.980 same sitting that vinnie rehm did to make the lincoln statue in the rotunda of the capital
00:48:31.320 incredible and there you can see what he's looking at with his right hand
00:48:37.660 He's looking at the Emancipation Proclamation.
00:48:42.360 And actually, the bust is more beautiful, I have to say, because you get to use your imagination.
00:48:47.860 All the information isn't there for you.
00:48:50.440 So because I made such a big stink about the Lincoln bust disappearing, and Fox News covered it, I became such a persona non grata in the library.
00:49:04.460 To this day.
00:49:06.460 So actually, I'm retiring at the end of the year when I was negotiating with the associate dean on retirement.
00:49:14.240 I said, there's one thing that I really want to get done before I retire.
00:49:18.760 I want a plaque to be set up next to the Lincoln bust that has either the last paragraph of the second inaugural or just the words, if they don't have that much room, with malice towards none and charity for all, which comes from that paragraph.
00:49:36.760 So she just actually melted and thought that was a great idea.
00:49:40.740 She went to the library and they said, oh, there's no way we could put a plaque on the wall.
00:49:44.860 Believe me, there's plenty of plaques on the wall.
00:49:46.920 And with, you know, Trump being president and we having to save so much money that's been cut, there's no possible way.
00:49:54.600 So, well, I'm still going to try to get that plaque there.
00:49:59.100 Oh, we're not there yet.
00:50:00.720 No, we're not there yet.
00:50:04.160 I actually wrote another essay. It's not easy being red, white and blue at Cornell to tell that story.
00:50:11.300 It's very easy to be red, white and blue at Ole Miss. Let me tell you this. Yeah. Thank you. So I wasn't aware. I don't think you had shared with me privately that you were retiring at the end of this year.
00:50:23.000 So, but now that you've shared it publicly, what are your plans post-retirement?
00:50:28.220 Do you plan to keep writing?
00:50:29.800 Do you plan what, what, what are the, what, oh yeah, the, the lights went off.
00:50:34.240 What are you planning to do next?
00:50:36.900 Other than spending all of your time with your lovely wife, Amy.
00:50:41.400 Oh, most of my time.
00:50:44.840 Yes.
00:50:45.400 Because actually that's, that's the real plan is all the time that I didn't get to spend
00:50:51.500 with Amy.
00:50:52.180 Right.
00:50:53.000 I'll make up travel, read books. Yes. Yes. Did you plan on? I'm sorry, go ahead.
00:51:00.740 Eat her delicious cooking. But I, but I do plan to write. So this course that I teach called
00:51:07.980 Light and Life, which brings in all the issues of free speech, frankly,
00:51:14.220 He tells the Wilberforce and Darwin story and the ants.
00:51:22.420 It's a great course.
00:51:23.740 I love it.
00:51:24.440 I also just recently wrote an essay on that course.
00:51:27.320 It's called, Is It Final?
00:51:29.600 And in the 150th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, Calvin Coolidge talked about the Declaration of Independence.
00:51:38.380 He says, when it says, all men are created equal, that's final. 0.84
00:51:43.040 Well, I think actually the Seneca Declaration improved that a little bit by saying men and women, but I get his point. And I said, I teach science like things aren't final. There's still question. Science is never settled. 0.52
00:51:58.960 But Fauci explained to us that it is settled. So isn't he the ultimate benchmark of science?
00:52:09.980 Fauci, you mentioned Calvin Coolidge. Are you aware of the real scientific term in evolutionary
00:52:18.540 psychology coined as the Coolidge effect? Do you know what that is?
00:52:23.800 Never heard of it.
00:52:24.260 Oh, so here's a story for you. So I'm sure this is a story that I discuss in this book right here in The Consuming Instinct. It refers to the penchant for sexual variety. I mean, which could apply to both men and women, but certainly the greater penchant of men for sexual variety and its evolutionary roots.
00:52:47.880 Now, why is it called the Coolidge effect? Because, and forgive me if I slightly butchered the story, but the general point will be clear. So President Coolidge and his wife are going around some farm and the wife says, oh, who is sort of going with all of these hens?
00:53:13.680 And they say, well, there's a there's a rooster, whatever. And then she so then she says, well, you know, hopefully you can tell that to President Coolidge so that he can raise his vigor.
00:53:24.220 And then later, President Coolidge comes along and says, oh, or is it is the is the rooster sleeping with a single hen?
00:53:34.040 He goes, no, no, no, with many hens. And then he goes, well, tell that to Mrs. Coolidge, meaning that sexual vigor is much more likely to be maintained if you introduce variety, which, by the way, the research has been done in zoology where you take, for example, a male rat.
00:53:55.940 You introduce a female, he'll mate with her. You take her out, you introduce another female, he'll mate with her. And he will literally mate until he dies, as long as you keep introducing a new female rat. And so that became known as the Coolidge effect. So here you go, linking a story about an American president with a fundamental driver of human sexuality.
00:54:20.820 Of course, what you're saying doesn't apply to you and me because our wives are so wonderful.
00:54:25.900 That is absolutely true. Will Chamberlain was once told, to your point, he was purported to
00:54:37.040 have slept with, I don't know, 20,000 women. And some guy said, you are such an amazing stud,
00:54:43.100 whatever. And then Will Chamberlain stops and corrects him and he goes, it takes a lot more
00:54:48.660 of a man to sleep with the same woman 20,000 times than to sleep with 20,000 women. Now,
00:54:55.200 I think in your case and mine, we have such exemplary wives that it is hardly a feat to be
00:55:02.260 with the same woman over and over again. And frankly, as someone who understands the evolutionary
00:55:08.180 reasons why people would want to stray, nothing brings greater happiness to a person than to find
00:55:14.860 that special person build a family build a life with them regrettably too few people in the west
00:55:20.420 are doing so because we are falling way short of the replacement rate but inshallah people will
00:55:26.460 start having sex again soon yes uh randy anything you want to promote uh before i could sit here and
00:55:34.960 speak to you for hours but i know your time is valuable anything you want to promote some project 0.92
00:55:39.200 you're working on, a book, a post-retirement, this is your time to tell us about it.
00:55:44.680 Oh, yeah. Let me say something. The 18 Cornell faculty put together the Future of the American
00:55:54.420 University report. And I begged them for a year to say the mission of the university
00:56:02.400 is the search for truth. And they just couldn't do it.
00:56:09.200 They just couldn't do it.
00:56:10.840 And, you know, I look at science as a free speech issue, actually.
00:56:18.620 You're having a conversation with nature.
00:56:21.800 And nature doesn't lie to you.
00:56:24.100 Nature doesn't make it easy.
00:56:26.140 You can make mistakes.
00:56:27.860 You can be fooled.
00:56:29.220 But nature doesn't lie to you.
00:56:31.380 And you have to have the same integrity when you're doing experiments and making observations.
00:56:36.460 And that integrity, that honesty, if there's no such thing as objective truth, why would anybody be honest, necessarily?
00:56:50.580 And, you know, if we're only selected to have many, many progeny, search for truth wouldn't be something that's selected.
00:57:07.760 The search for truth, I think, has to be accepted as a truth has to be accepted as a self-evident truth, I guess.
00:57:18.120 And so I'm really disappointed with the future of the American University Committee's report.
00:57:24.820 Our president, Mike Kotlikoff, just received the Courage and Education Award from the Steamboat Institute.
00:57:33.380 And his speech, which is online, is very good.
00:57:37.180 And he mentions the importance of truth several times in his speech.
00:57:42.480 And I hope he has the courage to not accept the faculty's report, because I think the faculty can't change the university from the inside.
00:57:57.220 I think we need a strong leader.
00:57:59.680 I think Mike Kotlikoff can be that strong leader.
00:58:03.060 If it's not him, we'll have to search for one outside the university.
00:58:07.620 That means the federal government.
00:58:10.420 Thank you for that.
00:58:12.800 Randy, so lovely to finally have you on the show.
00:58:15.660 Stay on the line so we can say goodbye offline
00:58:17.840 and come back anytime that you'd like.
00:58:20.260 Thank you so much.
00:58:20.740 Thank you so much, Gad.
00:58:21.900 It was a joy, a complete joy.
00:58:23.780 It really was.
00:58:24.480 Thank you.