00:16:39.160Sir, just over the lunch break, and you didn't mention Mr. Todd at all in the bombshell
00:16:43.260disclosure that you made today, but just over the lunch break, in light of that, in response
00:16:47.840to your news this morning, that you were aware of a number of CPC parliamentarians and former
00:16:52.200parliamentarians that are at risk of being compromised by foreign interference, Mr. Todd
00:16:57.360has advised that he has received a number of top secret briefings from the security
00:17:02.540establishment, and in none of these briefings has the name of any Conservative parliamentarian
00:17:08.280or candidate, past or present, been brought to the attention of Mr. Todd. Why is that?
00:17:13.500You'd have to ask CSIS for that, but my supposition is that Mr. Todd is not the one who
00:17:21.400is responsible for determining what candidates can run or not for the Conservative Party of
00:17:29.800candidate all right that's a completely wild supposition and here's why because ian todd
00:17:36.660is pierre polyev's chief of staff everything runs through ian todd right so if ian todd had access
00:17:47.120and has access he does have access to these secret documents he could just look on the on the
00:17:52.880documents and go oh we've got a problem here a couple of our mps former mps maybe future mps
00:17:58.140they're involved in this, in this foreign interference. So then he goes to Pierre Polyev
00:18:03.280and he says, Pierre, I really, and because these guys also have great relationships. If you're the
00:18:10.860leader of a party, you don't hire somebody who you don't like, who is below grade to be your chief
00:18:17.120of staff. You want the best of the best of the best. And you want to know that person. You want
00:18:20.980to have a good synergy, a good working relationship. You know, he finishes your sentences, that kind
00:18:25.660of a thing, right? So knowing that, would Ian Todd be able to go to Pierre Polyev and say,
00:18:34.200Pierre, I know you don't want to do this, but I just saw some very disturbing things on these
00:18:42.960secret documents, because he's got the same clearance as all of the other MPs. Well, he's
00:18:48.400not an MP, he's a chief of staff, but Katie Telford, that's Trudeau's chief of staff. She's
00:18:52.640got clearance too. He's got the same clearance that she has. And so if he saw these names,
00:19:00.080he could go to PolyEv and say, we've got a problem. You have to go and get this clearance
00:19:04.820so that you know what you can do with these people. And further to all of this,
00:19:12.820if these people are involved in a criminal conspiracy, knowingly or unwittingly,
00:19:17.800with a foreign power who's trying to interfere in our politics and interfere in our basic
00:19:23.560Canadian structures of things, that's criminal offense. That's nothing to do with the party
00:19:28.520whatsoever. Wouldn't you think the RCMP would be in there arresting people if this were that bad?
00:19:36.960Regardless of whether or not they're politicians for a certain party, it doesn't matter. What
00:19:41.840matters is if they've done something bad enough, then the RCMP should be at least questioning
00:19:48.220these people. But so far, nothing. Let's continue.
00:19:53.920It would be the leader and much of the information that is handed out to various
00:20:00.700individuals with security clearances is determined on their need to know basis.
00:20:06.240You indicated today, as I indicated earlier, in a very public forum and in a very public manner,
00:20:11.840your knowledge of the names of CPC parliamentarians and the risk being compromised by foreign interference.
00:20:21.520Am I correct, sir, that one way that you could arrange for those threats to be mitigated
00:20:25.320is through the use of threat reduction measures under Section 12.1 of the CSIS Act?
00:20:29.820Threat reduction measures are tools that CSIS has used regularly in many cases regarding
00:20:43.560different parliamentarians, and it is very possible that a number of those parliamentarians
00:20:49.920will have had visits from CSIS and either defensive briefings or others to try and
00:20:56.820mitigate the risks that they are going through. That is different from a leader choosing to
00:21:06.380willfully remain ignorant of very serious contentions, including by the ENCICOP, that
00:21:15.700the leadership race that elevated him to leader was compromised by foreign interference.
00:21:22.660And if the tool of the TRMs were used, you couldn't use the Leader of the Opposition's reluctance to obtain security clearance as an excuse not to provide that information to the CPC. Isn't that correct?
00:21:35.240I'm sorry, I'm not following. Can you rephrase the question?
00:21:37.300Sure. If someone wanted to get this information, this information about the names of the parliamentarians, for example,
00:21:45.260because of some imminent threat to the leader of the CPC, TRMs could be used.
00:21:50.840And in that event, it wouldn't be necessary for the leader of the CPC to obtain security clearance.
00:21:58.920If you were to know that a certain candidate had a high degree of exposure to foreign interference and vulnerability, either witting or unwitting, giving a threat reduction measure to that candidate would not necessarily, and quite frankly in my experience, highly unlikely to have the candidate spontaneously decide to step down as either a candidate or a member of parliament and not
00:22:28.920run in the next election. That is a determination that only a leader can make, looking at the
00:22:34.460vulnerabilities of that candidate, looking at the behavior, and to use the words of the
00:22:39.600NSIA, potentially poor judgment or inappropriate behavior or untrustworthiness. Those are
00:22:46.240the kinds of things that only a leader can actually ensure for the team that they're
00:22:52.440building and you know potentially future ministerial elevations that would then have to
00:22:59.560run into a security clearance process that would stop them like a brick wall knowing that as a
00:23:06.920leader as you are hoping to become prime minister of this country would seem to be a very basic bar
00:23:13.960to hit if you want to take national security seriously but the premise the underlying premise
00:23:20.200of that answer you just gave is that the TRM can only be directed at the person affected
00:23:25.100and not the leader of the opposition, isn't that correct?
00:23:29.860The TRM could be directed to Mr. Polyev.
00:23:35.600The identities of the people involved are themselves classified and available to only
00:23:49.320those with top secret clearances. So certainly CSIS could go to the leader of the opposition
00:23:55.120and say you really have to be careful to instruct all of your MPs to stay away from this country
00:24:03.140or to be concerned about diplomats from that country or not accept money, but from or not
00:24:08.500accept support from these particular diplomats. But the TRM would be unable to identify which
00:24:16.300of those individuals are in question unless the leader chose to get a security clearance to be
00:24:24.560able to hear those names. And the fact that the leader does not leaves him in a position of being
00:24:30.200unable to protect the integrity of his party. I'm going to suggest that you're wrong on your
00:24:35.900understanding of the law as to what a TRM can and can't do and who it can be directed to. And I'm
00:24:40.840going to suggest that the fact that you leveled this accusation earlier today and didn't mention
00:24:46.280the possibility of a TRM was just for the purpose of grandstanding here today?
00:24:49.820On the contrary, threat reduction measures are regularly used to highlight to people
00:24:59.160potential vulnerabilities, but having watched many, having known a number of parliamentarians
00:25:07.380who went through TRMs, they often come out of TRMs with a general sense of having to
00:25:13.380be more careful. But specifics are often not given, and there is no guarantee that a TRM to
00:25:21.480the leader of the party would include the names of the people most at risk or most engaged in
00:25:30.220potentially problematic activity. And that's why the refusal of the leader to actually access the
00:25:37.460intelligence on those names is as I said bewildering do you agree that often when
00:25:45.240CSIS or some other security agency shares classified information the
00:25:49.480recipient is severely constrained in what he or she can do with that
00:25:53.380information yes okay and in fact your own chief of staff yesterday gave
00:25:58.000evidence that the recipient of that information would not be able to use
00:26:01.440that information in any manner do you agree with that no i disagree because through his chief of
00:26:08.660staff under the bus the party leader can choose to uh not allow someone to run for them for
00:26:16.960any number of reasons knowing in the back of your mind that uh this is the real reason but giving
00:26:24.120it as an example i'd actually prefer to have this other person run instead so what he's saying here
00:26:30.400is he's going to lie to people about the real reason a person has been withdrawn from running
00:26:36.740in their writing for his party, and he's going to make something up, or he's not going to say
00:26:41.940anything at all. I know we've covered that, but that's essentially what Trudeau is saying here.
00:26:47.500Or you had, you know, sketchy business dealings in the past that means we're not going to go with
00:26:54.440you. There are all sorts of reasons that do not prove injurious to national security.
00:26:59.860the leader has a level of power over who runs and what roles they have
00:27:05.740that doesn't require them to explain themselves.
00:27:10.420It doesn't require them to explain themselves.0.99
00:31:29.540at least two years and he's done nothing about it until now i wonder why and as an additional
00:31:38.420bonus for trudeau he's trying to somehow make pauliev the bad guy here and all pauliev wants
00:31:45.460to do seriously is be able to talk to the canadian people about who's involved here and what should
00:31:52.260be done about it really that's it that's why he doesn't want to get the clearance because he
00:31:57.200doesn't want to be gagged by the NDA that he would have to sign if he did see these documents.0.79
00:32:03.800It's ridiculous. So here's what Polly have said. My message to Justin Trudeau is release the names
00:32:10.200of all MPs that have collaborated with foreign interference. But he won't because Justin Trudeau
00:32:16.940is doing what he always does. He is lying. He is lying to distract from a liberal caucus revolt
00:32:23.860against his leadership and revelations he knowingly allowed Beijing to interfere and
00:32:27.880help him win two elections. The full letter is right here on X. The allegations Poliev references
00:32:35.160have deep roots, particularly concerning China's potential involvement in Canadian politics. The
00:32:40.500controversy gained momentum in 2023 with CSIS revealing that they had been monitoring potential
00:32:46.300interference by Chinese government officials in Canadian electoral processes. Also, by the way,
00:32:50.980Trudeau decided, excuse me, that he wanted to take on the fourth largest military in the world,
00:32:57.800India, and expel some of their diplomats. And so naturally, Canadian diplomats in India
00:33:03.300had to be expelled as well. And the whole problem there, the Calistanis versus the Indians,1.00
00:33:11.680has been brought to Canada by Trudeau because of his failed immigration policies for the past
00:33:18.98010 years. So we've got so many Indians. And when I say Indians, I mean Indians from the Middle East1.00
00:33:25.320who are here now in Canada and they have taken taken over pretty much at least a good portion1.00
00:33:32.020of it, our political system and a lot of our culture. So their fight is now our fight and
00:33:38.980it's spilling out into Canadian streets. And that's because of Justin freaking Trudeau0.94
00:33:45.880and his open border policy sorry the world economic forum open border policy we're not
00:33:53.100going to get into the hand dong stuff and all of that needless to say polyev did shoot back
00:33:59.080at trudeau regarding these allegations and you know when you're testifying when you're on the
00:34:05.500stand testifying at a commission you don't want to be partisan this is about apparently anyway
00:34:11.440This is about national security. This is about what's in Canada's best interests. But instead, what he did was start taking shots at Pierre Polyev. Also, Jagmeet Singh is doing the exact same thing. If you have an account on Twitter, you would know this by now.
00:34:27.220So he is marching in lockstep right now with Justin Trudeau's attack Polyev on foreign interference stance.
00:34:35.000I thought that agreement had been ripped up.
00:34:38.740Canadian politics is getting very interesting, my friends.
00:34:41.280And I do believe in the next week to 10 days, there's either going to be a prorogament of parliament by Justin Trudeau himself based upon how many of his MPs in his own caucus are actually revolting against him.
00:34:56.980We have numbers anywhere between 20 and 30 who've signed this alleged piece of paper, this pledge to ask Trudeau to step down as leader of the party.
00:35:06.600But we don't know how that's going to play out.
00:35:09.080We do hear that all of these MPs will speak publicly together at some point next week.
00:35:15.980Anyway, getting back to the classification or declassification process in Canada.
00:56:22.440i'm sorry i'm sorry i just i can't i what if she wins oh man do you think it would be possible
00:56:45.080for us to get elon musk to try and colonize another planet so we could move there probably
00:56:51.020wouldn't be able to make it happen in the next 10 or 20 years so people like us were out but our
00:56:55.580kids our kids might be able to go from speaker mike johnson of the house of representatives of
00:57:04.760the united states regarding the hurricane problems that they've been having he said i recently
00:57:11.360traveled to north carolina and victims of hurricane helene told me nearly two weeks after landfall
00:57:16.900the biden harris administration had still not provided them with all the resources they
00:57:22.880desperately needed we've been hearing stories we've been seeing videos of this right for the
00:57:26.740last couple of weeks now maybe longer but cbs in a show of media censorship edited out entirely
00:57:35.020his firsthand perspective so here is the version that aired on cbs followed by his full answer
00:57:44.120So that's a different accounting than this 2% you say was distributed.
00:57:47.600Yeah, so they've obligated some funds, but they've only distributed 2%.
00:57:51.360The rescue and recovery effort's still going on, and then we address the rest of it.
00:57:55.220So that's a different accounting than this 2% you say was distributed.
00:57:58.880Yeah, so they've obligated some funds.
00:58:02.160He had his people video this while he was on the air, right?
00:58:08.600So it's a different sound, obviously, but it's his own people who videoed this.
00:58:12.440And obviously, the reason for doing this is to make sure that they don't egregiously edit you to make you sound like you're saying something you're not saying at all.
00:58:54.440They had not been provided the resources almost two weeks out from the storm that they desperately needed.
00:58:59.880And when I was there 13 days post the storm hitting that state, people are still being rescued.
00:59:05.860They're stuck in the higher elevations in the mountains because the roads are down and all the rest.
00:59:09.540So they need every available resource and all hands on deck, the rescue and recovery effort still going on, and then we address the rest of it.
00:59:17.680So that's a different accounting than this too.
01:08:31.520the person would not be notified, but there is
01:08:33.920These things that we, what we collect is like, if a bunch of items that, like, if at least a couple of items that a person has created has violated civic classifier, then they're also registered.
01:08:47.720Our OMG American swiper asked Jeevan if Meta was shadow banning users for their anti-Kamala Harris posts. Take a look at what he says.