00:12:29.460Yeah. Why are these courts still upholding the fact that these COVID-19 injections were safe and effective when we know now what we know?
00:12:40.820Well, it's an excellent question. The answer is that, in fact, no court in Canada has yet been prepared to tackle that question.
00:12:51.840In fact, they're avoiding it. They're avoiding it like the plague. Pardon the pun.
00:12:55.660There's no court yet that wants to deal with whether or not these vaccines are safe and effective.
00:13:02.000And in fact, that's why we're constantly met with these motions to strike.
00:13:07.100The motion to strike is a sort of a procedural preemptive move that the government of Canada has somewhat perfected.
00:13:15.660And this is their response in every single case.
00:13:19.220I should mention, in addition to a lot of the, you know, you quite properly note, you know, the double speak and double think in that particular article, I respectfully declined to speak with the reporter who works for what I regard as a former newspaper, the Winnipeg Free Press.
00:13:36.980And that article is very misleading because in this particular case, this worker, his case has nothing to do with those other three.
00:13:46.640Those other three cases were unsuccessful because the court refused to take jurisdiction.
00:13:53.900They said that all of those people were unionized workers.
00:13:57.280And because they were unionized workers, they had to follow through with the arbitration processes described in the collective bargaining agreements.
00:14:05.040And that was why we had to discontinue those cases. We lost in the University of Winnipeg case, and we discontinued the others because we knew we were going to lose after the court decided that question. But it was essentially the court saying, we will not hear this case. And so that was the issue.
00:14:23.020in this particular case, there's no union involved. And this is really a pure wrongful
00:14:29.820dismissal type case where a person is fired simply because they refuse to participate in
00:14:35.740an experimental drug trial. Let me ask you, this principle of judicial notice has been used
00:14:43.000repeatedly in cases across the country for the past couple or three years. And I understand from
00:14:48.460our friend Kerry Simpson in British Columbia, that this was a principle that was introduced by
00:14:53.320the Minister of Justice at the time. I forget who it was. It wasn't Jody Wilson-Raybould,
00:14:58.020the guy after her. I forget. Lamedi. David Lamedi. He got together with one Supreme Court
00:15:05.900justice and a bunch of justices from all across the country. And they decided they were going
00:15:10.660to impose judicial notice over all cases having to do with COVID-19 vaccine mandates or just
00:15:18.100mandates in general how have they been allowed to get away with this behavior it's nonsense
00:15:22.380it is an excellent question and it invites a broader discussion about what i call judicial
00:15:28.240activism in our country uh we're seeing this played out in recent cases shadow you probably saw
00:15:33.820um the earlier this week or last week where the supreme court of canada has decided that
00:15:40.120it's unfair to to pedophiles to expose them to minimum sentences uh and the and the federal
00:15:46.900Court of Appeal has said that there's nothing wrong with people being disqualified from employment
00:15:52.000insurance benefits, even though the only thing that they did wrong to disqualify them was to
00:15:58.140refuse to take a vaccine. But this concept of judicial notice is very old in our law. It's part
00:16:04.060of the common law. However, until recently, it's been confined to cases or situations where
00:16:12.920a particular fact is not in dispute and it's so obvious that no one needs to call evidence on it
00:16:20.260things like gravity you know the day of the week and and whether Justin Trudeau was a good prime
00:16:26.200minister things that are so obvious that there's not we need not call any evidence about it but
00:16:31.240this concept has been expanded uh significantly it's a very dangerous development in the law
00:16:37.580because these judges are exercising discretion, unfettered discretion.
00:16:43.320They're becoming the most powerful political force in our country.
00:17:00.060There's a $100 million, multi-hundred million judgment against him in the United States
00:17:05.720because he killed the United States servicemen who left behind him a wife and children.
00:17:12.040And he actually was in Guantanamo Bay.
00:17:15.880He sued the Canadian government for violation of his Section 7 charter rights
00:17:20.300to life, liberty, and security of the person.
00:17:22.460Justin Trudeau, not long after he became our prime minister,
00:17:26.380handed this erstwhile Canadian $10.5 million, Canadian dollars,
00:17:32.740which he used to buy a shopping mall in Edmonton.
00:17:34.860That's not the end of the story, though. The lawyer who acted for Omar Khadr not long afterwards was appointed to the Court of King's Bench of Alberta. Only last week, the judge who heard that case, Mary Morrow, was appointed to the Supreme Court of Canada.
00:17:56.280So these may be circles, lines and happenstance, or there might be something very peculiar going on in the administration of justice in Canada.
00:18:04.680And, you know, Mr. Lamedi talking to judges in that way, communicating to judges in that way, when you combine that with some of the things that were published recently about how judges are being selected, over 80 percent of them are liberal donors.
00:18:17.960I think Canadians need to be very, very concerned about how judges are being selected and who's occupying these very, very powerful positions, which arguably, I mean, they're more powerful even than premiers or prime ministers.
00:18:32.980Well, that is definitely a problem with the system of our government, that all of the judges in our country are appointed as opposed to being elected.
00:18:42.180Some are elected in the United States, not the Supreme Court, obviously, and not the circuit judges.
00:18:47.380But definitely at the state level, they are elected.
00:18:50.420In the municipal level, they're elected.
00:18:52.540And then maybe they try to move on in their career as judges sitting behind the bench.
00:18:57.240but that takes a very long time and it takes a very long history of proper behavior not political
00:19:05.460behavior but the politic politic sorry the politicization i have a rough time with that
00:19:11.940that's the right that is the word yeah i know i know but it's tough for me to say it anyway of
00:19:18.260our institutions the rcmp the court system uh you know even local police forces increasingly in the
00:19:24.940past three or four years has become more and more political is there a way that we can stem this
00:19:31.120tide do you think yes i well i can speak specifically about the about the judiciary
00:19:36.540and i have been asked to make certain recommendations to uh the alberta government
00:19:41.860hearing one of them is um you know all of this is what's called judge made law and in our system
00:19:49.200of governance, and this applies to Canada, the United States, and Great Britain, it isn't the
00:19:55.520role of judges to make law. Their job is to interpret and apply the law so that it's in a
00:20:01.060way that's consistent with the Constitution, with the laws that are passed by the elected
00:20:05.440legislatures, because we live in a democracy. The people who are making laws are our representatives,
00:20:11.280and that expresses, in some degree, when things are working in the proper way,
00:20:16.540the will of the people. But what has happened in recent years, and this, I believe, was the long
00:20:23.920game of the Charter itself. This was Pierre Trudeau's life's work, was the Canadian Charter
00:20:28.780of Rights and Freedoms. And it was always intended to be a subtle transfer of power
00:20:33.480away from legislatures in this country to the judiciary. And then what happens is you select
00:20:40.280the judges very carefully from a very small pool who tend to support what the prime minister
00:20:46.900and his government or what the premiers want to have happen. And this subtle power shift
00:20:53.300has occurred in our country. The way out of it, to answer your question, is that these judges
00:20:59.040can only make law to the extent that they have discretion, that they have room to move.
00:21:05.960And this distraction can be fettered, it can be restricted, it can be removed, and it should be.
00:21:12.200So we actually could have laws, for example, there's a law on the books in Alberta,
00:21:18.660and there's an equivalent one in Manitoba, called the Interpretation Act.
00:21:22.380And it defines statutorily the way the judges are supposed to properly exercise their discretion.
00:21:27.120And legislatures acting properly could actually pass laws that would state, for example,
00:21:32.740that a judge, a sitting judge, is not to override a protected freedom, a human right, let's say in
00:21:41.700a vaccine mandate type case, in order to enforce a public policy initiative. So there is a way to
00:21:48.980do it, but it will take legislatures acting properly. And in fact, one of the major problems
00:21:56.140that we're seeing in our governance today in terms of the way our legislatures are behaving
00:22:02.460is because of this judicial interference in the lawmaking process.
00:22:07.460In fact, if you look honestly at what's going on in Canada,
00:22:10.300most of the laws that we have that govern us are really coming from the judiciary.
00:22:15.000This is a big problem because we can't vote them out of office.
00:22:18.600You know, it's interesting that you should talk about the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
00:22:23.360I had Brian Peckford on the show about a year ago.
00:22:25.380And obviously, the last surviving signatory of that document.
00:22:31.840He would probably dispute you on what you just said regarding the charter being a document that was designed to slowly but surely move.
00:22:40.240It was designed by Trudeau. I don't think it was designed by by Mr. Peckford at all.
00:22:44.320I don't think I believe Mr. Peckford was well-meaning, but I believe it was Mr. Trudeau's intention to have it.
00:22:49.880Mr. Peckford holds that constitution or that charter very dear because he was part of it.
00:22:55.400Right. So, you know, he may take exception to that last statement.
00:22:58.680having said that i do agree with you but you make it sound as though this is a generational thing
00:23:03.720like pierre passed the baton to justin who is now executing executing the end game of the
00:23:10.200original plan which is very interesting i think it's smarter people than justin are doing it but
00:23:15.400i agree with you yeah i agree yeah there's probably the men in the gray suits in the
00:23:19.240background who were probably executing this but the judicial notice issue is is a problem
00:23:24.360Can we get around this? Because now, I mean, it has been proven these vaccines are not safe. They are not effective in the least. And so how can they take judicial notice that, in fact, that is the case? It is not gravity. It is not that water is wet or grass is green.
00:23:41.900Well, you know, I'm going to come back to my previous point. What is to stop the Parliament of Canada or the legislature of Manitoba or of Alberta or any other province from simply passing a statute saying there's no longer anything called judicial notice?
00:23:59.300Judicial notice is a construct of common law, has been with us for a very long time,
00:24:03.740but it's a legal principle that is being abused by judges and governments.
00:40:29.940in the same way that Quebec is right now.
00:40:32.480Some of your viewers might not realize that Quebec is so secular and so atheist that missionaries are sent from around the world to Quebec to try and start new churches.
00:40:47.520So what has happened over the past couple of generations is we've had this increasing secularization of Canada to sort of make the rest of Canada over in the image of Quebec in terms of it being a purely secularized society.
00:41:04.320And, of course, with that, we've had more of this wokeness.
00:41:07.360We replace Christmas with the holidays, you know, and so more and more we've been drawn into this.
00:41:16.060We've been seduced into this false religion, and we've moved away from, you know, from the Christian principles upon which, you know, the country is properly based.
00:41:34.480more and more people are realizing the absurdity of this wokeness. There's been a tremendous
00:41:39.840backlash recently, as you probably noted, Shadow, where the left, the people who support all this
00:41:47.180wokeness, realized how very anti-Semitic they were when they sided with the Palestinians
00:41:54.820in these atrocities that occurred over in Gaza. That was shocking to many people.
00:42:00.200And we have we have people actually walking through the streets in some of our major cities, you know, you know, queers for Palestine.
00:42:09.780And how bizarre could that be? It's incredible.
00:42:12.860They don't realize that, you know, that just being gay, you know, gets you gets you imprisonment or even death over over in those countries.
00:42:23.620So you're thrown off a building. It gets you burned at the stake. It gets stoned in the street.
00:44:37.340Yes, that is happening, although there are some exceptions.
00:44:40.140There's a young Josh Alexander, and you raise a good point, Shadow.
00:44:45.680However, I have a different take on that.
00:44:49.080I think if you look back, for example, to the 1950s, you think of for when Elvis Presley came along, you know, and they couldn't, they could only film him on the Ed Sullivan show from the waist up.
00:45:01.400In fact, some Bible thumpers got a court order that said that he had to stand in front of a crowd in Florida and not even move his body while he sang.
00:45:12.020That was an example of sort of conservatism gone amok, gone too far.
00:45:17.520And the counterculture that grew out of that was liberalism.
00:45:25.760You know, all of Newton's laws of motion apply to human affairs as well.
00:45:31.220And I think what we're going to see, and this may horrify the woke crowd, is we're going to see, I predict, maybe the most conservative generation that we've ever raised in this country.
00:45:43.980because we know young people glom on to counterculture and the counterculture right now
00:45:50.400is conservatism and freedom uh that's you know that so that's my that's my 10 cent theory
00:45:57.380buy it if you like but it seems to me it's borne out by history it's a very interesting point i've
00:46:03.900been saying for a very long time now when is the pendulum going to switch back and start coming
00:46:08.840back to the other side leighton let's talk about the lawsuit you filed in september uh representing
00:46:13.700700 and counting canadians with three different categories in this class action can you please
00:46:19.140uh explain it and are you accepting any new people because some people are messaging me
00:46:23.400today asking can i get in on this it's it's many more than 700 now and um i'm just going to go back
00:46:29.560a step to kind of explain the genesis of it because it ties into that the lark hole in the
00:46:33.980winnipeg free press so we we tried we tried to sort of punch through um this the this uh
00:46:41.580sort of punch a hole in the sky in that when the vaccine mandates came on
00:48:10.380These are people who had their employment relationship with companies that I just described interfered with by the federal government.
00:48:18.860So the action is against the federal government because if the federal government hadn't come along and told all these companies to impose vaccine mandates, these workers would have went along and their lives would have been fine, whether they're unionized or not.
00:48:31.180So they can claim actual tortious harm against the governor of Canada for interfering in that contractual relationship.
00:48:40.640The other class of plaintiff is a broader one that applies almost to every unvaccinated Canadian.
00:48:48.660So we're saying that, you know, for a very long time, as you know, unvaccinated Canadians cannot get on a ship, a train or an airplane in this country.
00:48:59.440And we suffered all manner of harms. So the class action is a national class action. It's filed in the Federal Court of Canada Trial Division. It's very broadly based. It claims charter violations, including Section 2 of the charter, which is freedom of religion. Section 6, which is mobility rights. Section 7, which is life, liberty, security of the person.
00:49:22.680Section 8, Unreasonable Search and Seizure, and also Section 15, which is equality rights for people who were denied eligibility for employment insurance simply because they refused to participate in a drug trial.
00:49:37.680We've also claimed violations of the Bill of Rights, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and we're seeking damages, damages for intentional infliction of mental suffering.
00:49:50.100and, as I said, tortious interference in economic relations.
00:49:54.120We also have included a claim under Section 3.1 of the Genetic Non-Discrimination Act of 2017.
00:50:01.920And we've also claimed violations of the Assisted Human Reproduction Act of 2004.
00:50:07.000But essentially, what this action claims and what it seeks are damages against the Government of Canada
00:50:13.300for people who were harmed for no other reason than that they they refused to be injected with
00:50:20.420a substance that we now know very clearly any anybody who's paying attention in fact it was
00:50:25.860read in any any things that pfizer has put out uh that these things cause grievous bodily harm and
00:50:32.100death um and so this is for the uh the people who have suffered harm as a result we have now um
00:50:39.380rid of the thousands of people who've expressed interest in being involved in the class action.
00:50:45.320Formally, the way a class action works, and you might be aware of the shadow, is we have a
00:51:02.300plaintiff. The case is going into something called certification. This is what happens with
00:51:07.200the class action, where the court determines whether there is a proper cause of action there,
00:51:12.040a reason to sue, that the case can go on to trial. We're expecting that the federal government is
00:51:17.000going to vigorously oppose certification and do all their usual moves, try to bring motions to
00:51:22.060strike and so on. Once the case is certified, once the claim is certified, then all of the other
00:51:27.500people who want to be class plaintiffs, then they can become formally part of the class action.
00:51:33.700What we're doing in the meantime is we're taking expressions of interest from people.
00:51:38.320We're taking their information so that we can collect their data so that when the time comes when they can join, we have a database of people who are interested and want to be part of it.
00:51:48.960I should mention also, and this is purely optional, for those people who want to participate in the crowdfunding initiative, they can do so.
00:51:56.940It's a minimum contribution of a one-time donation of $300.
00:52:02.680They do not need to pay that in order to be part of the class action.
00:52:07.100There's no cost to be involved in the class action.
00:52:09.320However, we're going to have to carry this on for quite a while.
00:52:12.440We're fighting people who can literally print our own money to fight against us.
00:52:16.380And so it is going to take money to sort of keep gas in the tank, keep this thing moving along.
00:52:21.900The response to the crowdfunding has been really, really astonishing, really great.
00:52:26.600I'm very grateful to people for doing that.
00:52:28.580How much late is it going to take for this kind of an action to move forward?
00:52:33.400Because it's going to take years, too, I think.
00:52:35.260I would say we've estimated between $1 million and $2 million to get the case through to the point where we realistically have a settlement.
00:52:50.300The reality with class action is our goal, sort of getting the football across the goal line, is getting through certification.
00:52:58.560Because with class actions, almost invariably, when you get the certification, the case will settle.
00:53:05.320And of course, this government has a pretty strong track record of settling cases rather than litigating them.
00:54:11.140And I think as time goes on, the complexion, the political complexion of this thing is going to shift considerably.
00:54:19.060As you know, it has already, even in the last two years.
00:54:22.620And I think as time goes on, I don't think this is going to fade into the rearview mirror.
00:54:27.060I don't think it's that kind of situation.
00:54:28.740I don't think we even scratched the surface of the harm that was done to Canadians, to the fabric of our society, by the way that we were abused and mistreated by our governments.
00:54:40.280Let me ask you this, Leighton. You mentioned several sections of the Charter of Rights that you are putting into this lawsuit, but also you mentioned the Bill of Rights. And there have been a lot of arguments in the past couple of years. Can we use the Bill of Rights when we go to court as opposed to the Charter? Because the Charter's got Section 1, which allows the government to get out of it if they apply the Oaks test and all of that. So you've got both in there. Can you explain that, please?
00:55:06.980Yeah, so the Bill of Rights is not considered, it's not entrenched, it's not part of our
00:55:26.000And you're right, there isn't a Section 1 clause.
00:55:29.740And so we still can't argue it in court.
00:55:32.860One of the things that's happened in Canada, and it's a little bit strange, for some reason, and I know why from reading the jurisprudence, our courts, especially the Supreme Court, got the idea that the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and for that matter, Section 35 of the Constitution, which deals with Indigenous rights, are the be-all and end-all of our Constitution.
00:55:57.080But actually, we have a very long tradition of constitutional law going back a thousand years.
00:56:03.880And it's very strange to me that our courts are only looking at the Charter.
00:57:22.940The Charter is a new document, and it's gone through a couple of different eras now.
00:57:28.900And the era that we're in right now is where Section 1 is being very, very dominant.
00:57:35.680But I don't think that's going to last.
00:57:37.640I think the law tends to lag behind society and change society a little bit.
00:57:43.900And I think the section of the charter that's going to become increasingly important is Section 24-1. Section 24-1 is a section of the charter that allows courts to grant remedies, things like damages, money.
00:57:59.740And I think that we're coming into an era where we're going to have increasing constitutional litigation, and we're going to see more and more damages being rewarded against governments which violate the Charter.
00:58:14.540That's my prediction, and if that isn't true, then we're all going into an authoritarian, totalitarian hell, and someone like Hannah Arendt will come along and write a book about it.
00:58:26.540we're all going to have to stand up and i think more and more people are uh what's your take
00:58:31.620quickly i know there's a publication event so you can't talk too much about the ins and outs of this
00:58:35.400but what's your take on the situation with those guys uh from the coots uh border blockade the
00:58:41.340four guys who were still in lock up now seven seven is it 700 days now yeah i'm far from i'm
00:58:48.120far from an expert on this case because i haven't followed it as closely as some have my good friend
00:58:53.480And Jason Levine is very steeped in this.
01:00:16.400So I do think that there is this definitely this is a political trial.
01:00:21.020But, you know, I also have to note that this that the prosecution is being is being run by the province.
01:00:29.220So the province could put a stop for this any time.
01:00:32.320But they don't seem to have any appetite to do it.
01:00:35.480Now, this is what I wanted to ask you.
01:00:37.420I mean, people are asking, can Daniel Smith just say stop?
01:00:40.000Would that not be tampering in the judiciary like Trudeau got in trouble with with SNC-Lavalin, right?
01:00:47.060Yeah, and we did have a scandal here during the election campaign where it was nearly disastrous for her.
01:00:56.060Fortunately, she was able to weather that storm.
01:00:58.840Yeah, I think she's being very careful, although that could change.
01:01:03.260One of the things that I don't know if you folks in Manitoba caught this, but we had the United Conservative Party had their AGM in Calgary, and it was the most attended political convention in many years, some say in Canadian history.
01:01:22.760And what is very encouraging, hopefully will be encouraging for people in your province, is the board of 20 that basically runs the UCP has gone very grassroots, small C conservative.
01:01:37.440The progressives had their day with Jason Kenney.
01:01:40.140He was their guy, and they've been moved out.
01:01:42.920And so Danielle Smith has been, she's been very astute, very careful.
01:01:47.280during the first year or so that she's been in office.
01:01:52.180But now she has a clear mandate and she doesn't have to worry about being ousted by that board.
01:01:59.480And it's important to note for Alberta, you know, we haven't had a conservative premier finish in office,
01:02:07.540finish their term in office since Ralph Klein in 2004.
01:02:10.900This is a real concern for people who lead the United Conservative Party.
01:02:15.260But she doesn't have that concern anymore.
01:02:16.740And so I would not be at all surprised to see her start to govern in a way that is – I know, I happen to know that the UCP has a very clear agenda that they want to put forth, and it's going to make the woke people very unhappy in Alberta.
01:02:35.820Well, you know, I liked a lot of the resolutions that were passed this past weekend, including the ones that you wrote two, three, and five. Am I correct?
01:02:43.780Yeah, I did. I wrote three of them. Thanks for mentioning that. Yeah, it was my great honor to be able to do that.
01:02:48.580Yeah. So and one more thing before I let you go. I wanted to talk to you briefly.
01:02:54.060I know you're a proud indigenous man in Canada and you've got many honors and accolades and you've worked on behalf of Aboriginal peoples all across the country.
01:03:04.780The Buffy St. Marie situation. How do you feel about that?
01:03:08.040Well, it's very much a sign of the times, isn't it? You know, it's kind of bizarre. My late father once told me one time, he said, you know, Leighton, you can be ashamed of Indians, but you should never be ashamed to be an Indian.
01:03:27.240I've always been proud of them from the Carry the Kettle Band in St. Louis, Saskatchewan.
01:03:31.080And, you know, but it's interesting that we now live in a world, a generation where people who are not part of the really an indigenous heritage are sort of ascribing this to themselves or trying to because now we have sort of a hierarchy of the oppressed.
01:03:53.020and so and i think supplies across the board i think there are many more people
01:03:57.740um i think there are many people who are claiming to be transgender
01:04:01.200or otherwise lgbtq who actually are not i think there are people who are masquerading
01:04:06.480as that in order to advance their careers um i think that this is the same true same is true of
01:04:12.800people who are who are indigenous and uh it's really strange it tells you sort of
01:04:18.240how perverse our you know our culture has become uh but you know to appropriate an identity
01:04:24.200uh is is something in order to advance one's career uh is something that i think is uh you
01:04:31.860know is disgusting and and shameful and what's worse is that you know she refuses to come clean
01:04:37.260about it uh you know a little bit of honesty would suit her much better i think um but you know i
01:04:44.400also by the same token i want to say that i don't believe in cultural appropriation uh i think that
01:04:50.800canada and the united states uh are the shining examples to the world of multi-ethnic societies
01:04:57.040that not not multicultural multi-ethnic societies uh that work well under a under a banner under a
01:05:04.960common flag of shared values and and so i actually don't mind a bit when uh people who are quote
01:05:11.440quote unquote, white or whatever, you know, want to get interested in, in, in indigenous culture,
01:05:16.720I think it's great. I mean, I enjoy many different things about different cultures from food to music
01:05:22.120and all those things. And I think that just enriches all of our lives. But to see someone
01:05:26.680who sort of puts on a, you know, a culture like a suit of clothes in order to advance their careers,
01:05:33.720I mean, to me is, I think is, is, is disgusting, but it doesn't surprise me to see something like
01:05:39.880that connected with the cbc interestingly you said a common um banner like everybody getting
01:05:47.060together under a common banner all the different you know values that we hold and beliefs that we
01:05:52.520hold and whatnot and yet i found it interesting i put out a tweet a couple of months ago uh during
01:05:58.020orange shirt day you know every child matters and i said how can you wear that t-shirt and believe
01:06:04.100in abortion you're a hypocrite you would not believe the marxist heads exploding out there
01:06:09.640after that one that was a pretty yeah it's a funny you know yeah and you know you mentioned
01:06:14.200indigenous who among us is not indigenous we all are i mean the white people of europe are
01:06:19.800ditches to europe the asian people are i mean we're all indigenous to some degree and to create
01:06:26.240a separate class or you know separate emoluments or things like that for people i think uh you know
01:06:32.580i think it does a disservice i don't i'm not a believer at all in an affirmative action uh i
01:06:38.700believe in a pure merit you know meritocracy and that we're all capable of under that
01:06:45.280structure we're all capable in bringing out the very best in ourselves and making contributions
01:06:51.520to our families and our communities and our country uh i got in trouble for saying that
01:06:57.520back in 2020 but i'm still singing the song leighton this has been an absolute pleasure
01:07:04.020man thank you for coming on tonight i would love to do this again with you thanks shadow i really
01:07:08.400enjoy your your show thank you for being a beacon of uh freedom salt and light to people who want
01:07:14.000to get you know real truth in media uh we need more like you thanks thanks so much for having
01:07:19.580me on your program how do you by the way how do you find time to do a podcast for goodness sakes
01:07:24.200you're busy with all these cases yeah i my my wife is a saint uh but yeah i you know i just
01:07:31.660i have the energy to do it and uh i know where the energy comes from and it's not me
01:07:35.940amen thank you for coming out we'll talk all right thank you okay there is Leighton Gray
01:07:41.940who I think is a a shining light I mean he has taken on so many cases and he's willing to take
01:07:49.560on more it's just a matter of having the time to do it guys I have one more thing to show you
01:07:56.340before we wrap it up for the night and I thought this was kind of funny well by the way Tucker
01:08:01.580carlson is going to be in calgary in january of next year go to tnc.news there's that little
01:08:08.400banner there if you want to go see tucker carlson in january in calgary click on that little banner
01:08:12.980there i'm sure you'll be able to find your way to getting tickets for that event he's going to be in
01:08:16.760conversation with danielle smith oh and by the way i'm sorry to tell you this um uh let's see
01:08:23.440dr peter mccullough that show on thursday night in red deer has been sold out however there are
01:08:31.280some people who now can't go and they're trying to sell their tickets uh you can find a post on
01:08:37.100canadians for truth on facebook regarding that sellout and then the people in the comment section
01:08:42.160saying i have two tickets we can't we can't go anymore a prior engagement has come up so if you
01:08:47.600want to go check out that post on the canadians for truth facebook page you may be able to get
01:08:53.420a couple of tickets uh to go to that event again that's thursday night in red deer look at this