00:07:41.720Yeah, it's interesting between the Charter and the Bill of Rights.
00:07:47.740What we're seeing is that JPs, judges, police officers, lawyers, paralegals, you name it, politicians, anybody in the legal sphere here in Canada completely dismisses the Bill of Rights.
00:08:06.040And they say, well, you know, first it's from 1960. Listen, there is case law going back to, I don't know, case law that we use. 1938 is one of the case laws that we use regarding implied Bill of Rights. So the age is not relevant. Okay. So, and I've had people argue with me, we'll say, well, there's new laws. Well, of course, there's new laws, but that doesn't mean that the old laws are dismissed.
00:08:33.300So that's one thing to understand. The second thing, and I will say this is the only saving grace in the Charter of Rights is Section 26 that says existing rights are to be protected.
00:08:48.180because um unlike the bill of rights the charter clearly states that these are the rights here
00:08:55.560within it guaranteed here within it um with limitations in section one these are the rights
00:09:01.660here within unless uh unless it can be demonstrably justified uh to take them away basically and even
00:09:08.220if you go to uh the government website the government of canada website and you go to
00:09:12.460chartopedia in the chartopedia which by the way the charter of rights is the only piece of
00:09:18.000legislation that you will find that has its own pedia nothing else has its own pedia and when you
00:09:23.740read it it's again i feel like it's one of those things that's deliberate because it actually makes
00:09:28.800it hard to find the charter of rights the bill of rights is also hard to find through search and
00:09:33.140that's another trick right you type in bill of rights and you get the charter but anyway i had
00:09:37.980that issue just about an hour ago as i was looking for it i went no no i said bill not charter yeah
00:09:42.860And that and that's that's deliberate because the the browser should very easily be able to pick up the meta tag for Bill of Rights.
00:09:52.340And again, this is this is trickery of the government because they don't want us looking at the Bill of Rights.
00:09:56.680They want us looking at the Charter of Rights. And again, going back to the fundamental difference between the Charter and the bill,
00:10:02.040the bill very clearly states that is an act in the recognition of our human rights and fundamental rights and under the supremacy of God.
00:10:11.760recognition and protection thank you a recognition and protection and so this and this is this is
00:10:17.880huge this is huge because on one hand with the charter you have the government giving you your
00:10:24.240rights and what do i always say amanda if the government can give it the government can take
00:10:29.560it away and the bill says no this is this is solidifying your rights that already exist
00:10:36.460uh under the supremacy of god now amanda likes to speak about the things that are
00:10:42.000missing in the charter or that the charlotte is silent about so amanda why don't you take that
00:10:46.320one thank you okay so this is what i like to get into and that's why before you start amanda can i
00:10:52.480just say you two are very entertaining together i'm really enjoying it thank you well i i told
00:10:58.240you we work well together i did tell you that shadow i said you told me to have us both tonight
00:11:03.200rather than just one of us and i'm so happy you're both here so please me too thank you
00:11:08.400so with respect to canadian charter rights and freedoms and with respect to the canadian
00:11:13.200bill of rights one thing i just want to highlight on rebecca said our saving grace is is is section
00:11:19.96026 eric recognize our existing rights but i'm going to say actually no the saving grace of
00:11:26.140the canadian charter rights and freedoms is the preamble and i'm going to say what and i'm going
00:11:30.160to explain this to you why. The preamble of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom says,
00:11:33.800whereas Canada is recognized upon the supremacy of God, I'm going to stop right there. It actually
00:11:37.480says a little bit more, but the first thing in the preamble is it recognizes supremacy of God.
00:11:42.540That's really super important because of where I'm going to go with this in a minute.
00:11:46.780But, and I've actually argued the preamble. I did a charter challenge once and I argued the preamble
00:11:52.860and i know i was right because um i i lost in the poa court i won in the appeals court
00:12:00.360and they literally removed any acknowledgement of my preamble argument that's how bright it is
00:12:06.620wow so um are you suggesting there's there's corruption in the courts well i think the
00:12:13.820courts didn't want it on the record they i had enough in my appeal that they were able to give
00:12:19.120it to me on something else. They didn't want it on the record. I see Rebecca nodding yes.
00:12:26.000So going back, let's go into what is missing. What does the Bill of Rights have that the
00:12:31.760Charter doesn't acknowledge? Well, we already know that the Charter only guarantees the rights and
00:12:35.680freedoms set out in the Charter. So if it's not in the Charter, those rights and freedoms are
00:12:40.500not guaranteed. So what's missing? Human. So going back to what is Canadian Bill of Rights?
00:12:46.280It's an act of recognition and protection of your human rights and your fundamental freedoms.
00:12:58.620Free men, free institutions, and the right to position of family and society, which is in the first paragraph of the preamble.
00:13:04.140I believe the first paragraph of the preamble of the Canadian Bill of Rights is Canada is a nation affirming that it is founded upon the acknowledgement of the supremacy of God.
00:13:15.620There's the supremacy of God again, right in the preamble.
00:13:19.000And then it goes on, and the position of family in society of free men and free institutions.
00:13:26.460So those are really, really powerful words.
00:13:28.820And I'll get back to that preamble thing again, because preambles are so important, people.
00:13:34.140But we have now, I've established we're missing human, we're missing family, we're missing free men, free institutions.
00:13:42.500There's no property rights at all in the Canadian Charter Rights and Freedoms.
00:13:45.620So guess what, folks, if they're violating your property rights, you don't have to use the charter because you got the Bill of Rights because the Bill of Rights protects your property, whereas the charter doesn't.
00:13:56.000You have the right, the individual has the right of the individual to life, liberty, security of person and the enjoyment of property and not to be deprived thereof, except by due process of law.
00:14:05.000So there's your property rights right there.
00:14:07.040The other thing that you don't have in the charter, you really, truly don't have in the charter is equality.
00:14:12.000In Section 15 of the Charter, they talk about the fact that you have equality, but then it has a list, and it's based on sex, creed, race, and whatever else, and I'm not trying to diminish anyone's rights who've ever been discriminated from that, but right now you'll hear a lot of people saying white men are being discriminated against, but they don't have any rights anymore.
00:14:36.020Well, that's not true, because under the Bill of Rights, everyone has the same equality before the law, the same equal right to protection of the law, and that's protected under 1B.
00:14:45.5001B doesn't have a list, because the moment you start dividing and taking people out, you're actually taking away rights from someone else.
00:14:53.760So if you don't segregate, if you don't separate, then we're all equal.
00:14:57.480And it's the only place that we will all ever have equality.
00:15:02.720um because here's the thing i'm never going to swim like michael phelps and i'm never going to
00:15:06.880run like paula radcliffe cliff i have my own gifts that i was born with and i have to learn to develop
00:15:11.680those gifts that i'm born with but where i do have equality and where we all have equality is in law
00:15:16.740that's it that's the only place equality exists now i want to quickly go back to that preamble
00:15:21.020why is a preamble so important a preamble you know this is great i don't have to say a word
00:15:25.440tonight i think that you're going to take over the show it'll be the rebecca and amanda show
00:15:29.700sorry about that no worries no worries but preambles are super important when you see law
00:15:34.620and or constitutions because everything that follows must defer to the preamble the preamble
00:15:39.240is the subject of what you're addressing in the law and everything that follows must defer to the
00:15:43.820preamble so the charter has the supremacy of god and the um uh and the bill of rights has the
00:15:50.160supremacy of god and everyone keeps saying people like brian peckford keep saying well the charter
00:15:54.400has um that is the supreme law of canada and the reality is no it's not because the preamble
00:16:00.300recognizes supremacy of god in both the canadian charter of rights and freedoms and in the canadian
00:16:04.780bill of rights let me just interject on that one amanda because i did have brian peckford on the
00:16:08.880show a couple of months ago and i did ask him that question i mean if we already had a bill of rights
00:16:13.120why did we need a charter of rights and freedoms it's right in the constitution it's the supreme
00:16:17.080law of canada and the final section and all of that yeah yeah it's not even the final section
00:16:22.560there's lots that comes after section 52 that everyone ignores yeah but what what he did say
00:16:27.640was because it's enshrined in the constitution it makes it the supreme law of the country as
00:16:32.880opposed to the bill of rights so let me explain to you i just finished saying to you the preamble
00:16:37.860recognizes the supremacy of god in the charter and acknowledges the supremacy that canada is a
00:16:43.220nation founded upon the principles that recognizes supremacy of god god is supreme which means god's
00:16:50.120law is supreme and when people go wow there are so many different gods no folks there's only one god
00:16:56.060in a british commonwealth system and that's the church of england the bible is supreme
00:17:01.780yeah that that's why every court in this country has one in it but um to finish my point peckford
00:17:09.900told me that the bill of rights is only a statute not part of the con or sorry the uh the constitution
00:17:16.920Therefore, it can be overturned by an act of parliament.
00:17:25.400So one thing to note about the Bill of Rights and the Constitution.
00:17:29.580The Constitution has been changed, what did we say, 30 different times, Amanda, and five times where specific, where since the charter was, I can't say received royal assent, but since we started using the charter, so 1982.
00:17:44.200The Bill of Rights has been changed twice.
00:17:46.920And the two revisions was one to to change to include the Statutory Instruments Act, which is a fantastic piece of legislation.
00:17:58.600The Statutory Instruments Act was created in 1985, which is proof that the Bill of Rights is still fully intact as the Statutory Instruments Act was was received royal assent in 1985.
00:18:10.580And in it, it states that any new laws, mandates, orders, regulations that are created must adhere to both the Charter of Rights as well as the Bill of Rights.
00:18:21.520Again, the Charter of Rights is from 1982 and the Statutory Instruments Act is from 1985.
00:18:27.060So there we have a single piece of legislation referencing both pieces of legislation.
00:18:32.400Um, furthermore, um, there's, uh, the, the second edition or amendment, I should say
00:18:39.300was, uh, I believe it was 1985 again, when the, uh, war measures act was replaced, was
00:18:46.580revoked or repealed and replaced with the emergencies act that was just illegally declared
00:30:45.060So we have found case law, and I'm going to just narrow in on the one that we tend to lean on the most.
00:30:51.040It's called the R versus Asante Mansa.
00:30:54.240And in this case law, what's not relevant is that the ruling is not what is relevant.
00:31:00.080What is relevant is that it was security guards and the application of the Trespass to Property Act, which is a provincial act of legislation.
00:31:08.740And so the judge was and Section 25 of the Criminal Code of Canada refers to the protection of people with the authority to enforce law.
00:31:18.420it's basically a vicarious liability protection so that anyone would have when they're working
00:31:24.260for their employer type of insurance so they were using section 25 against the security guards and
00:31:30.140as peace officers and or private citizens and whether or not they use the right amount of force
00:31:35.260and would they be protected for the amount of force that they used against this person again
00:31:40.500the ruling the the what the ruling was is not relevant the fact that they were using section
00:31:45.84025 to a provincial piece of legislation ties it to the criminal code of Canada, because that's
00:31:50.280exactly where anybody enforcing law in Canada gets their vicarious liability protection from.
00:31:57.340And I'm just going to expand a little bit because a lot of people don't understand what that means.
00:32:01.260When you work for an employer, and I'm going to use a purulator driver as an example, because
00:32:05.860that's one that's quick and easy analogy everyone will understand. You are covered by your employer
00:32:12.160should you be in an accident. You do your job, you have your parameters of your job,
00:32:16.600you're doing your job in good faith, but hey, we all make mistakes. And if you make a mistake,
00:32:20.300you will be protected under your employer's insurance. And that's called vicarious liability
00:32:25.020protection. So if you're enforcing law in Canada, you get your vicarious liability protection,
00:32:31.400if you will, from the government, and you get it through Section 25. But only when you're acting
00:32:36.420in good faith. The moment you're no longer acting in good faith, and you're actually acting beyond
00:32:41.040your authority you now then become personally liable and the best case law for that one is
00:32:46.380called roncareli versus duplis this 1959 okay how how is it that you ladies have become so
00:32:55.760knowledgeable about all of this i mean you can you can spout this stuff because every day every day0.61
00:33:03.660we're helping people the other day i had four phone calls in a row quarantine quarantine
00:33:09.240quarantine. I got $6,000 ticket. I'm traveling here. How do I get back? What do I do? We deal
00:33:16.220with phone calls and emails all day. And Amanda has already had a background, is self-taught in0.98
00:33:24.000law. My background is I'm a project manager. I've been a project manager for 20 years.
00:33:28.720And in my field, I started out in more of a technical role. So I was reading technical
00:33:34.040documentation sometimes writing technical documentation to some capacity and you know
00:33:39.020i i need to know what i'm what i'm what is happening on a project and i need to be able
00:33:43.580to understand it and articulate it to the client so i i have this kind of this aptitude and i like0.97
00:33:50.400reading legislation because i'm a problem solver i'm very inquisitive i'm i'm nosy as fuck is what
00:33:56.640i am and i want to get to the bottom of things so my story is a little yeah i mean rebecca's0.70
00:34:02.720telling you that I have a self-educated myself as much as I have been able to over the years
00:34:07.740because a long time ago I started to see a real issue I saw them going after myself included
00:34:14.060innocent honest people for money and I would see criminals not being you know you'd see crimes
00:34:21.960taking place and they wouldn't investigate the crimes but they would certainly go after innocent
00:34:26.180honest people, setting up speed traps, trap, I mean, that, that word alone should tell you
00:34:32.460something. You know, if they have to trap you, then then come on, I mean, leave people alone,
00:34:38.740but they would, you know, so I had a real problem with this. And I started looking into it.
00:34:43.500And I, I'm not going to say that it didn't look at the free men movement, but it didn't resonate
00:34:48.900with me. And I found it more effective to actually start learning the law. So you could find the
00:34:55.220where the law conflicted with itself so you could actually take it back on them if you will
00:35:00.440now i'll tell you that i mean like i sit back and read law versus the constitution sometimes
00:35:06.440the bill of rights i go wait a minute this conflicts completely like which one is actually
00:35:10.940going to be the final in terms of the hierarchy of and that acknowledges the record and recognizes
00:35:16.860supremacy of god what is harmonious with god's law is lawful otherwise they may call it legal
00:35:24.180but it may not be lawful and let's also remember that the canadian bill of right states in it that
00:35:29.620it applies to all laws not just federal laws all laws and again i successfully used me myself and
00:35:39.300i have it recorded because i record my my my court appearances don't tell them that and um
00:35:46.660And so I use again, I had charges, they charged me for and this is this is I'm gonna this is this is what's really important when you get charged with something. First thing you do is you said whatever it is you submit for trial. Okay, we may have different views, Amanda and I on this, but submit for trial, and then get your disclosure, full stop, get the disclosure.
00:36:09.360then when you get the disclosure you can read that and you can see um you can you can decide
00:36:15.840okay you know what this is really out of my league so I'm going to get legal consultation
00:36:20.720not legal counsel not legal representation but legal consultation but if you get your disclosure
00:36:27.800and you read through it and you go you know what I could probably make sense of this but so here's
00:36:31.540an example that happened with me I got my disclosure uh I got they were two summons put
00:36:36.320into one um sorry two offenses and one summons and the offense was violating the reopen ontario act
00:36:43.360under when we were still in the emergency under the emergency management civil protection act
00:36:48.160so it was the reopen ontario act 2020 and then i was charged under regulation 8220
00:36:54.080but what was missing was the regular section the subsection the schedule whatever it is
00:37:02.000under the regulation so all it said was violating the continued 7.0.2 order under the emcpa
00:37:09.600under the real the ontario act regulation 8220 well what did i do because there's a whole bunch
00:37:14.320of stuff in regulation 8220 it's like if you buy if you if you were if you violate the criminal
00:37:19.680code which section in the criminal code i had the same thing happen to me rebecca the exact same
00:37:24.640thing i mean they told me you violated this under that and i'm wondering what is it give me the
00:37:28.400disclosure so they did and you know what it is a bunch of fuzzy pictures you can't even tell who's
00:37:32.800me oh yeah yeah that's that and and like and so my disclosure okay it was 25 pages for me standing
00:37:39.360in a park with surveillance people inside a building for standing in a park this is the world
00:37:45.600so anyway i i read through it actually amanda jane and i were up until one o'clock in the morning 1
00:37:50.24030 in the morning going through it and i went into court and i said well great so can you show me
00:37:55.520me can you show me the section in the subsection where I've been charged well it's 82 20 oh yeah
00:38:01.080okay cool well we're in 82 20 well no no it's a section 7.0.2 okay and then this is what I do
00:38:06.360I pull up the regulation I say to them okay I'm looking at section 7.0.2 right now and this is
00:38:11.000what it says so where is that an offense oh it's in over here okay well I'm looking at that right
00:38:15.500now where's it an offense well it's and then it's this big circular conversation and went round and
00:38:20.680round round and I said to them this is a violation of my rights as per section 2.2 d1 which is the
00:38:28.500right to um to have your charges identified in a prompt fashion here it is a year a year and
00:38:35.320three months later and you still can't tell me what I'm charged with so that's a violation of
00:38:39.240my rights under the Canadian Bill of Rights and they still wanted to proceed and I even said you
00:38:43.520know this is a waste of the court's time I know you guys are backed up this is a big waste of the
00:38:47.600court's time. So I went to the, the pretrial, because this was a judicial pretrial. So then
00:38:53.780I went to the pretrial, or whatever it was, no, the first one, they thought I was, they thought
00:38:58.780I was going to take early resolution. I was like, if I wanted to do that, I would have checked that
00:39:02.800box. Anyway, when I got to the pretrial, they said, well, no chance of conviction, conviction,
00:39:07.540done. All I did was say my name, no chance of conviction, done. The point here is that I didn't
00:39:13.480have to rationalize using the bill of rights and that's what that's that's that's something that we
00:39:18.420actually we thought we needed to do was to say well you know the jp is actually uh uh regulated
00:39:25.720federally regulated and is therefore under section 25 vicarious liability blah blah blah blah blah
00:39:32.020guess what i didn't say any of that i just said section 2d1 and in my other summons which is for
00:39:37.520again um um another um outdoor event i'm using the bill of rights for that as well and nobody
00:39:44.560said you can't nobody said that you can't use that here because this isn't provincial this isn't
00:39:49.120federal actually i had one justice of the peace that say when i was going on about um you know
00:39:55.280he has said here to the bill of rights you don't need to tell me the law i know the law
00:39:59.320yeah you know i mean now is there a difference because i hear a lot of people trying to use
00:40:07.480the charter of rights and freedoms have a problem they have to declare what their intentions are as
00:40:12.420opposed to using the bill of rights yeah yeah and i want to yes and i want to clarify that because
00:40:19.200here's the thing okay and you're going to hear folks say you're going to hear folks say they're
00:40:23.580using the charter incorrectly you have to go through the court first it has to be proved in
00:40:28.180the court first well section 24 says otherwise section 24 says after your rights have been
00:40:34.780violated you can apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to have your case heard excuse me
00:40:41.820apply like begging no and again this goes back to section one if the government giveth your rights
00:40:50.580the government can take away your rights and you know what the only person i answer to is god
00:40:55.240i don't give any other human being authority over me absolutely not i've done that in my past life
00:45:13.600the site. Yeah. Yeah. I've been updating periodically. Yeah. And what kind of a
00:45:18.680project manager was I, I was an ass kicker. No, I was, I worked in ad agencies. Can you believe0.95
00:45:25.460that? I still do actually part-time, but there's the website right there. It's stand, the number
00:45:29.600for the stand for the.com. Let me ask you another question. I mean, like you guys are such a wealth
00:45:35.040of information that I, I want to make sure I try to get as much in as I possibly can. Um, let's
00:45:40.040just say that you walk into a business even now that most of the mandates have been removed in
00:45:44.100most provinces I think there might still be the odd mask mandate in whatever some province maybe
00:45:50.860but there are still some businesses who are trying to enforce masks right so if I walk into a coffee
00:45:58.080shop let's call it the brown bean and they say I'm sorry sir but you can't come in here with without
00:46:02.480a mask on I'm going to have to ask you to leave is there recourse for that there is I for me I
00:46:09.100would just take my money elsewhere i i'm just going to speak for myself there are bigger fish
00:46:13.900to fry in this world i mean yeah yeah but let's just you want to make a point with these particular
00:46:17.580people let's just say they wronged you in some way notice of liability take them to court for
00:46:21.760for a rights violation amanda do we want to list off the rights and the the violations oh you know
00:46:27.640i keep digging up more it's so many well but the big nuggets are okay so for starters if someone
00:46:35.140is trying to enforce you wearing a mask, then they're validating your right to informed consent
00:46:40.080because it's a medical procedure. Wearing a mask is a medical procedure. Or if they want you to
00:46:44.980show your vax pass, that is a right to privacy. Well, the right to privacy actually is a tort
00:46:49.920under tort and inclusion upon seclusion. You don't have the right to force someone to share
00:46:57.000their private medical information. And then, of course, you've got the informed consent, which is
00:47:00.960So if you're trying to force medical procedure making me wear a mask to come into the store, that is actually assault because you're not giving the form consent and informed consent like and this is under our versus you and Chuck and consent must be given freely and it must be given, you know, you have to you can't use an exercise of fraud authority or honestly, I just finished writing on this.
00:47:24.980But but the point is, is if you don't have informed consent to to push someone into a medical procedure, like wearing a mask, then then then that is just another tort violation.
00:47:41.660Yeah. And what it is, is it's a criminal violation.
00:47:44.440But here's the problem with trying to go to the criminal courts.
00:47:47.100Yes, you could potentially go into the criminal court and under 537 of the Criminal Court of Canada, prepare and lay the information yourself using a form two.
00:47:56.140But then you could be you could be blocked by the crown and or the attorney general and may never see the light of day of a court.
00:48:03.420But here's the thing, just because you have because it's a criminal court violation, doesn't it's not exclusive to the criminal court.
00:48:11.800So think of someone who has been into a drinking and driving accident where that person is convicted in the criminal court for drinking and driving.
00:48:20.940The victim can still take that that person that injured them in the car accident to court for tort for tort.
00:48:29.640Now, what a lot of people don't understand about laws, there's you know, there's OK, there's tons of aspects of law.
00:48:34.940But really, and this is, again, I'm not a legal professional, folks, but the best I can describe it is there's really three sections in law.
00:48:44.720You have criminal law on one side, and then you have court contracts and torts on the other side.
00:48:52.300But you've got contracts and torts, which is the civil side, criminal court on the other side.
00:48:57.020And with contracts and torts, you either have a contract and someone's breached the contract or you have a tort and a tort is an injury that did not like it's it was unforeseen or it could have been foreseen.
00:49:08.440It could have been intentional. It could be unintentional. But the point is, is that someone injured someone and there was never an agreement in the in the first place.
00:49:15.660So those are really the factors of law that people sort of need to understand.
00:49:19.280And then if I were to tell anyone, if you want to start learning about law, what you really need to focus on is understanding contract law.
00:49:26.360if you understand contract law you can start layering on top of that but from my from my
00:49:32.280position where i began is i began trying to first understand contract law now i know that dr graves
00:49:38.160i've never read it has a course called jurisdictionary which i think from what i've
00:49:43.040i've never read it myself but from what i understand a lot of what i share um apparently
00:49:49.800dr graves does as well uh but he takes it from a perspective of jurisdictionary i take it from
00:49:55.880the perspective of contracts but the two kind of do overlap you need to understand that if you
00:50:00.060don't have the jurisdiction the contract doesn't apply um but i for me it's about contract law and
00:50:06.280the reason why i'm so focused on contract laws because contract is an agreement it requires
00:50:10.460consent of all the parties and now we're back into consent and now we're back into free will
00:50:14.540and now we're back into god's law so what is the plan moving forward with stand for the stand for
00:50:21.800dot com you want to i know you guys have been serving notices of liability uh that's been a
00:50:27.260thing that you've been doing but are you going to be taking ministers to court are you going to be
00:50:32.060taking bureaucrats to court are you going to be taking mps to court yeah please go ahead this
00:50:36.940we are going to put out templates that people can can use if they wish to we're going to let
00:50:43.620them know what the pros are we're going to let them know what the cons are we're going to say
00:50:46.860here's a template it's just sharing information you can choose to use it or not that's entirely
00:50:52.520up to you but here's the thing we can't yeah we can take people to court but it's more effective
00:50:57.840if tons of people take these these people to court and and i've dubbed it death by a thousand cuts so
00:51:04.860if you have if i were to take omar egreb the minister of transport to court for 35 000 in the
00:51:11.220province of ontario that's 35 000 but if 10 of us file 10 35 000 claims that's 350 000 if 100 of us
00:51:19.700do it that's three and a half million and if a thousand of us do it that's 35 million do you
00:51:23.140think omar is going to be a minister anymore i don't think he's going to be a person anymore
00:51:28.340if that's the case he's not a person now but more importantly an evil person yes like you're
00:51:35.420taking him personally to court for tort that is what that is the living human soul not omar the
00:51:43.660minister the living human soul omar lowercase r lowercase o lower lowercase a what is the
00:51:52.000difference now now that's something i hear with the free man argument on the one hand there's the
00:51:55.860person and on the other hand there's the contract or the uh the man right is is there a difference
00:52:02.920there is some truth to that okay but it's it's not it there is a definition of person in law
00:52:10.580okay but but where this free man i'm not i don't do do i want to say the what we were maybe not
00:52:18.940here because we don't offend anybody no no no no you know what there's a lot of people with a lot
00:52:24.160of different views on this whole thing I call it free charts oh so so here's the thing I used to
00:52:33.080I used I I was I used to go to Christopher James meetings and I used to participate in that
00:52:38.400and again you know when I was working with the other folks in the group and I was very much
00:52:45.160into that and I believed it and then I realized well here we are two and a half years later
00:52:49.460nothing has changed and if it was that easy to just change things by declaring yourself a free
00:52:56.340person then would then then wouldn't this be over because and that's not reality and this is the
00:53:03.460thing is that we've helped people who went into the courts that were falling following this free
00:53:09.860man direction and the one guy he went in there and said oh you know there's a specific way that
00:53:16.820you address yourself I'm the so-and-so of this clan and the judge said oh I guess he's not here
00:53:21.820okay um and he's like no no no no no no no I'm here because you have to this is this is what
00:53:27.980we're all about uh you know what this is actually a great segue into and and maybe we could have
00:53:32.620done this when we started the call but that's okay because hey let's just jump into it because
00:53:36.280that's how I roll that's how I roll um but what we are all about and where we've really honed in
00:53:43.620and and having Amanda and Jane I mean Jane is Jane is I call her the Jedi master because
00:53:49.500and I'm just going to digress for a moment you will be hard-pressed to find any legal professional
00:53:55.440that has the the the background that Jane has that is specific to the issues that we're facing0.95
00:54:02.580today Jane has been I call it raging against the man for 40 years everything she has done in her
00:54:10.280professional capacity first of all has been a little bit outside of the box also she has gone
00:54:16.240up against the government she's gone up against the cas children's aid society if you look up
00:54:20.980jane scarf on google whatever browser you use hopefully not google right you will find her
00:54:26.560being arrested on stage you will find her on an interview on i think it was global news accusing
00:54:31.480the government of participating in an rbc bombing like you you're gonna find jane back in the day0.97
00:54:37.260going fuck y'all okay is she the one who came up with the bill of rights argument or was that yes0.95
00:54:41.960yes yes and she jane herself has done about 40 different charter challenges and then last year1.00
00:54:49.320she went to alberta and had epiphany when she was there and went holy shit we gotta we gotta ditch
00:54:55.060the charter and the thing is is that the charter is not working right now but anyway i i can easily
00:55:00.220digress on that i gotta stay focused here um we what we do is all due process of law
00:55:07.760and so this is the challenge when you look at free man the the concept of free man on the land
00:55:15.340which by the way i am sovereign i don't need to ask to be sovereign i don't need to do a ritual
00:55:23.680to be sovereign i don't need to do any documentation to be sovereign i am sovereign i will not
00:55:30.100ask for it because that means if i'm asking for my sovereignty that's acknowledging the fact that
00:55:35.540they can take it away from you or that i've already allowed somebody to have it right okay
00:55:39.380so no i am sovereign i was born sovereign i've just been tricked and now i see the light the
00:55:45.360you know the the lights being shed here i see the truth now um so so when we use the framework that
00:55:52.560we have against them that's when we're seeing real change happening that's what we're seeing
00:55:57.560the courts again anyone that we have helped um go into the courts using the bill of rights and using
00:56:04.560um the position that we like we do one-on-one zooms with a call like you're going to court
00:56:10.120tomorrow okay this is like you got this you know you could do this remember you know whatever it
00:56:15.880is um uh then she then then these people are winning using the bill of rights and how we're
00:56:23.700going to get them is through due process of law and i just see it seen a comment in here that i
00:56:28.480think this person might want to eat their words because uh we're seeing absolute success in the
00:56:34.300courts and amanda can can vouch for this anybody that we have helped has had their charges dropped
00:56:41.100every single person that has followed the direction because there have been some individuals that
00:56:48.280didn't follow the direction we tried to help them and they went a different route and there's not
00:56:52.380much we can do about that that's it is what it is but um uh again not just last week we had uh
00:56:59.980sandra uh um um bowder she had her charges stayed james bowder is getting a jury he's getting a
00:57:08.460jury um yeah because of the bill of rights he said and it's a provincial charge i believe as well as
00:57:15.300a criminal but he said you know what canadian bill of rights i have the right um and he used
00:57:20.120section two of the bill of rights and he said i want to i want a trial by jury i don't want to
00:57:24.960judge on this band yeah and i don't think he's going so far as to ask for a trial of unvaccinated
00:57:30.460yes exactly because that would be his peers right right um we had um janice is doing self
00:57:38.800representation she was charged for a mischief as many people were at the at the convoy and uh and
00:57:46.960And the JP, or sorry, the judge in this case, criminal charges, chastised the Crown and said, that was a humanitarian effort.
00:58:05.900Well, and I'm just going to say, if you're not a legal professional and you don't have 40 years experience, as Jane does, you may want to give that woman some respect.
00:58:14.440You know, Jane has done a lot of good work.
00:58:16.180I can't tell you the number of people that Jane has helped, that we have helped, that collectively we have helped, and we don't – I want to make it clear, too.
00:58:26.900We all do this out of the goodness of our hearts because we care.
00:58:30.440We are doing this because we want to see people become successful in the courts because when they're successful, guess what?
00:58:36.480We're all successful, and guess what?1.00
00:58:38.800I benefit from that, too, because I don't want to live in this world anymore where we're being suppressed by morons because they're morons.1.00
01:00:01.720And I'm very cautious of what we put out from Stand for Thee.
01:00:10.220Because we are responsible for people.
01:00:12.640And I take that very seriously. I want to make sure that people are getting the right information so that they're not being misled. And I'm very cautious. And I do hold this very close to my chest. And Amanda and Jane can attest to this. And that's for a reason. Because if I don't, and I don't say we don't, because Amanda, Jane and I, we're like, we're the, we're the, what is, what is it? I see Bojana is on here and Bojana calls us three musketeers.
01:00:38.760and uh and so it's important to me and and this is why um uh I do hold things close to the chest
01:00:48.700because I I really would be I don't want to see people getting information that's not the right
01:00:54.980information and that could jeopardize themselves in the courts or anywhere else because again if
01:01:01.640they fail I fail we fail you know yeah you know what guys I got to wrap it up I'm wondering if
01:01:06.780you would be willing to come back on the show at some point soon you want us back yes as a matter
01:01:13.100of fact i do i think there is far more to discuss but the only thing is i've got a another show
01:01:18.440coming up in about 15 minutes so i have to get ready for that and i would love to have you both
01:01:23.260back on at some point in the next month or whatever because you name it you name it we'll be here i
01:01:29.400will be in touch then thank you very much rebecca thank you very much amanda for agreeing to come on
01:01:34.080the show tonight on such short notice stand for the.com you guys stand for the.com thank you
01:01:42.040again you guys appreciate it thank you so much looking forward to being back all right there is
01:01:46.780amanda there is rebecca from stand for the man like i'll tell you what i don't know how they've
01:01:53.100been able to retain like absorb and retain such information and be able to just go ahead and
01:01:58.520and spout it out, you know, without any notes, crib sheets, and useful information.
01:02:06.960I was going to ask them about my tickets.
01:04:39.560I have no idea how that fight started, but it's pretty epic.
01:04:45.640That employee who cracks his head on something, obviously, he's got blood pouring from his temple here or his eye, gets up and tries to take on Brandon Langley again.
01:04:57.580By the way, Langley has been suspended by the Calgary Stampeders, and he's been charged with simple assault.
01:05:02.980The airline employee has been let go, but not charged.
01:05:09.560You can look that up on Twitter, or you could just Google Brandon Langley, and I'm sure you'll find that video.
01:05:17.740The T-shirt giveaway is coming up in just a second from Tacit Investigations and Security.
01:05:23.360If you want to get a hold of these guys, you want to get a hold of Jeff and his team, 204-952-4775, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year.
01:05:32.340You can also find them online at tacit-investigations.com.
01:05:37.160a private investigation and security agency located in the heart of the continent, innovation,
01:05:42.440intelligence, and integration. It is tacit investigations and security. And the show is
01:05:47.860also brought to you by Canada, nano silver.ca Canada, nano silver.ca your home for silver
01:05:54.980cell technology, your home for skin, great skincare products. And again, guys, all natural
01:06:00.580products, silver supplement, protect your immune system with silver biotics, silver supplement.
01:06:06.580it is family safe it's all natural again made with the power of silver salt technology no
01:06:12.580preservatives no artificial ingredients dyes or flavors no additives sugar-free gluten-free it's