00:01:00.520So, no, but in all honesty, I came forward and I had done a transcribed interview for six hours and 40 minutes behind closed doors with the Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee.
00:01:13.040when it looked like that the cia was obstructing our investigation when it looked like um
00:01:20.840every obstacle was being put in place um when the subpoena came i was frankly i was happy to go
00:01:27.500i was happy to to speak publicly but then you become i mean you're in a different category
00:01:33.220once you do that i think um that's a big decision isn't it it is it is you know i i had i hate to
00:01:42.160said, I had some practice with the COVID vaccine mandates. And frankly, you know, maybe we'll be
00:01:47.560touching on this earlier, but that story that came out publicly on May 13th in front of Senator
00:01:55.140Rand Paul's committee, I had passed that story to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence
00:02:01.840in April of 2024. I'd also given it to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence,
00:02:38.460This is the legislative branch's oversight of the most powerful, arguably the most powerful agencies in the government, which have very little civilian control, particularly CIA.
00:02:47.560I think there are only, what, three appointees at CIA?
00:02:49.980I believe three appointees, which is, in my opinion, not enough.
00:02:53.520Oh, well, it's totally crazy because it means whoever's elected by the public doesn't have any control over this agency, which I think is proven true.
00:03:01.280But anyway, the control is supposed to come from the Congress in the form of these two committees.
00:03:07.300so when you tell them something really rotten is happening in cia where you work
00:03:12.880you expect they're going to do something about it i did and i think covid opened my eyes um i was
00:03:19.780naive i was uh i was an operations officer so i didn't i most of the time i spent most of my time
00:03:26.100out in the field uh collecting intelligence recruiting spies that was my job i was not an
00:03:31.500analyst i was not collecting other people's intelligence and turning it into finished
00:03:35.860intelligence. And I was a bit naive about the process. You're doing the traditional work. When
00:03:40.520people hear the term CIA, they think of what you were doing for a living. Yes. Which is not what
00:03:45.100most people there do. Correct. Correct. Um, you know, the director of operations does the,
00:03:50.600conducts the operations for the agency. We collect the intelligence and, and this is why this whole
00:03:55.500living in foreign countries. Correct. You know, I, I was gifted many things, uh, from the agency.1.00
00:04:01.040I was gifted Mandarin language training, Arabic language training.
00:04:05.820I could use some brush up on Arabic, but my Mandarin is still pretty good.
00:04:11.160And they give us a lot of authority to live and work overseas.
00:09:07.520I'm convinced that the intelligence community could have made a pretty sound assessment by mid-2020 that there was a significant chance that this was some variety of lab incident that occurred that caused this pandemic.
00:09:26.300And a lab incident changes how we view public health, public health policy.
00:09:33.700So if it's a natural incident, I have a feeling, you know, if Americans, and I said this during
00:09:41.140the testimony, if Americans knew that the basis for the vaccines, for example, came
00:09:48.260from a nucleotide sequence that was given to us by the Chinese government, and we just
00:09:53.100took it, put it into a computer model and said, well, here's our, here's our vaccine.
00:09:57.740And people are like, but didn't you just say it came from some lab in China and Wuhan?
00:10:02.800they probably would be a little more hesitant
00:11:38.280But the CIA would have had to have given the information that was requested from Director Gabbard's Directors Initiatives Group.
00:11:45.520That probably could have cleared everything up.
00:11:47.460We, when I conduct an investigation, actually an intelligence operation, if I'm going after a target, first thing I do is put together a timeline.
00:11:56.060Okay, a timeline of events, known things about the target that we're investigating.
00:12:01.740If I don't have everything that goes in that timeline, I can't give you a full answer.
00:12:08.020And, well, CIA simply refused to provide the information.
00:12:12.420And it was obvious early in the outbreak that this was from the lab.
00:12:18.240I mean, there were Chinese researchers who said it and then subsequently, as you know, disappeared.
00:12:23.260but people were saying this from february of 2020 yeah and um and it always seemed likely to me
00:12:31.140but the u.s government from the very beginning went along with this pangolin lie
00:12:36.280yeah and then subsequent to that even when it became obvious that it was a lie
00:12:41.180we were describing continued the cover-up why
00:12:44.960well um part of the reason i mean fauci is part of that reason and you know i'm going
00:12:53.240going to be very blunt about it. And since I'm going to be blunt and also give my opinion,
00:12:58.260you know, when I was sitting in front of the Senate, I want to make sure I was very accurate
00:13:02.940in everything I said. I don't want to give some supposition, but I will give a little supposition
00:13:06.720here as well. Because, you know, I have a brain, I think, you know, I've got synapses that fire off.
00:13:13.420And occasionally when I see data, I don't, you know, if it looked, yeah, quacks like a duck.0.99
00:13:19.820right so um i think anthony fauci was fully aware that um the funding that had gone on for various
00:13:28.800types of dangerous research dangerous gain-of-function research had been going on for a
00:13:33.240very long time okay different viruses different bacteria and um you know there are i see connections
00:13:41.980to for for good good reasons as well biodefense i see connections to to to research that goes on
00:13:48.660but um i think they understood that a house of cards was going to fall down if this if this got
00:13:55.520out too quickly that that there was a distinct possibility that american know-how american
00:14:01.720expertise i mean we really do i mean i take a look at some of the scientists that the
00:14:08.820the ic relies on for for expert advice these people are really really impressive people okay
00:14:16.240um you know they they uh they receive funding to go do research they're involved in health
00:14:26.240they're involved in biodefense all of a sudden you've got a virus that looks boy sure there's
00:14:33.100there's a couple ties that tie the financing over to wuhan china he had to know he had to know what
00:14:41.220that looks like at the end of the day so instead based on everything that's out there he gets the
00:14:47.700proximal origins of SARS-CoV-2 written with his buddies that paper gets waved around the IC as the
00:14:54.320end-all be-all as the paper to prove that yes it's it's a zoonotic origin and he had to know
00:15:02.280when he's pushing these type of experts a variety of experts that he pushed towards the IC
00:15:07.380once in February of 2020 and again in June of 2021,
00:15:15.840He wants to ensure that narrative is pushed at the IC level.
00:15:21.140And unfortunately, I'm going back to the comment I made before,
00:15:26.260some people just appeared to swallow hook, line, and sinker.
00:15:30.940There was actually, I read an email where a very senior person,
00:15:34.540And I, I wish I could name names, but a very senior person waved that, basically waved that paper around and said, well, we've got our answer. That was somebody who was in a position to, to sort of influence, not sort of, in a position to influence how the IC looked at SARS-CoV-2.
00:15:53.180Why are they covering it up now? Fauci's gone, new administration.
00:15:56.600i think that um there's an embarrassment piece again i think you know you don't want to be caught
00:16:03.900with your pants down i think that um you don't want to be caught at all covering up from a global
00:16:09.300pandemic that killed hundreds of thousands of people yeah so there's i think um i think see
00:16:16.140and hold on let me be very clear about who doesn't want to be caught with their their pants down
00:16:20.720causing a global pandemic um very the senior people within um dni's um
00:16:29.680the part of the dni that's responsible for looking into wmd matters and bioweapons matters
00:16:37.140and the weapons encounter proliferation center over at the cia there's very senior people over
00:16:41.540there that had a heavy hand in what happened and it's not the analyst like the the technical
00:16:49.560analysts that were were pushing saying hey listen guys this looks like this is a lab leak their
00:16:55.200careers were destroyed for pushing it this is the story that i really want to make sure gets out i
00:17:00.360want to correct the record they were not bribed there was this there was a number of analysts
00:17:06.060inside the cia and they did everything in their power to include writing a little dissent email
00:17:12.720that went all the way up to the top of wcpmc saying hey listen guys we're technical experts
00:17:18.260and i'm paraphrasing obviously we have this much expertise and it's it looks like a lab leak
00:17:25.380their careers were destroyed after that they weren't no longer part of that establishment
00:17:30.380and um if there's ever uh so the entire leadership of ca swung behind this lie
00:17:36.980that it was from an animal yeah and why are they still doing it well because because i well tell
00:17:46.820what when the cia produces the documents that were requested to help finish the investigation i think
00:17:52.640we'll have a better answer on but how can cia get away with not producing those documents or
00:17:57.660documents from the kennedy assassination 63 years ago which they also haven't produced as you know
00:18:01.680how who allows that to happen oh that's a that's a packed question there's a few pieces to that
00:18:08.700so senior managers allow it to happen inside the cia um and oversight to some extent lets it well
00:18:16.400oversight has failed clearly over the years i'm not criticizing right now i just want to be clear
00:18:22.080i'm not i think actually rick crawford is on it right now i'm definitely he'd be the member of
00:18:27.220congress who oversees the house in telco yes yes so historically they've abdicated their their role
00:18:34.840in oversight let me give you an example i want to give you a very clear example when i was a young
00:18:40.480officer, you know, not a young officer, but, you know, I had earned my stripes, done my work,
00:18:46.760and I was going to do my first meeting with a liaison service. Now, most of the time it's like,
00:18:52.600good luck, buddy. Yeah. Have fun. I actually had a senior officer pull me aside. He said,
00:18:57.820listen, here's how this would be a foreign intel service. So this is where you get declared to the
00:19:02.080foreign intel service. You're no longer hiding from everybody. And you're working together on
00:19:06.940goals that are, you both care about, hopefully. And, um, he said, listen, this isn't going to
00:19:13.140go well. Here's how this is going to happen. Here's what I need you to do. He did what rarely
00:19:17.240happens for CIA ops officers. He trained the junior officer on how to handle the meeting.
00:19:22.640I was so grateful. Years later, and I love the guy, um, years later, he disagrees with me,
00:19:30.400by the way, on just about everything of substance, but he's a great officer.
00:19:33.300and um he pulls me aside i had gotten a job where i was interacting with oversight on a very regular
00:19:41.280basis my job was to ensure that the things that were coming from the cia that were going over to
00:19:46.680oversight were truthful honest we were we were producing things that was valuable for them to
00:19:53.400actually do their job so and i never really done that kind of work i dealt with oversight before
00:24:38.020Make sure that you consult us before you decide to give anything over to them.
00:24:42.260Okay, and not only that, I said that I had done a six-hour and 40-minute transcribed interview in a skiff in March of this year for his GAC.
00:24:51.440Republicans and Democrats were both there.
00:25:41.040I went to Sissy in April of 2024, and I told them a story about six of seven technical experts saying COVID origins, you know, COVID originated in a lab incident.
00:42:03.160but um you know if if the naming conventions for um the various offices at the cia are made
00:42:13.880so indistinct that outsiders can't understand what they do in that office
00:42:19.820well um that that's meant to protect the type of operations where there's sources and methods
00:42:26.220but there's a real question on the oversight piece like how does oversight happen if you
00:42:31.640can't go what exactly does that office do right there what does it do it's got a weird name where's
00:42:37.320the money going yeah how why does it need that much money and you also have to ask like is cia
00:42:43.280doing anything that's so critical to the interest of the united states that you would give up any
00:42:49.660hope of managing it or having oversight over it that you would allow it to be its own country in
00:42:54.360the middle of your country the answer is there that shouldn't occur period i mean morally ethically
00:42:59.480know is it occurring i worry it is oh i think it was definitely occurring there's no question about
00:43:05.640i mean just i mean yeah i mean from my experience it sure looks like it yeah it sure does and again
00:43:11.560if we don't even really know there's a big debate which i've listened to carefully about where this
00:43:18.060money is coming from and again is not all coming from the congress so what um follow the money
00:43:26.480But how can you, if CIA is running businesses or engaged in business practices as an agency, which it is, it's like, I get that this can all be justified.
00:43:36.840If I were king for a day, if I were in charge and I wanted to start the process, I totally get this.
00:43:43.260It's become such a gargantuan problem.
00:43:47.640But if I wanted to like make immediate gains on that question, how do we, I would.
00:43:54.220So the director of CIA, the deputy director of CIA, and it used to be the chief operating officer, they've changed names.
00:43:59.980They have special authorities to grant no-bid contracts under national security auspices.
00:44:08.460I would come in and I would start auditing every single one of those contracts that were given out by the director and deputy director, particularly in that little window between administrations.
00:44:20.900okay once you catch a little bit of wrongdoing it makes a lot easier to justify okay now we're
00:44:26.600going to start doing the deep dive why don't we take a look at you know the other funding
00:44:30.480mechanisms that are in play for various type types of uh intelligence work i would definitely
00:44:36.740i would definitely audit incutel 100 percent incutel needs to have a full audit can you explain
00:44:43.420for people who don't know what incutel is incutel is uh you know it's it's the venture capital arm
00:44:48.540that funds all sorts of stuff that um venture capital arm of what of the cia okay i mean i
00:44:55.840know the answer i just want to make sure that everyone listening understands that cia has its
00:44:59.720own and i'm quoting you venture capital arm yeah so we thought that's something that happened on
00:45:04.600like sandhill road and you know northern california but no cia has its own venture firm yeah yeah i
00:51:07.220Director Gabbard shouldn't have to negotiate with,
00:51:09.180with Director Ratcliffe over some of this stuff.
00:51:12.800She had people in her team that have all the intelligence background to handle the type of products that were coming out of CIA, operational traffic, those sort of things, and had to negotiate.
00:51:32.740The president issues an executive order January 23rd saying, I want all available documentation on these number of historical incidents, including the assassinations of the 60s, but not limited to those.
00:51:59.720I wish I knew because we expected, we, and I, you know, when I say we, I mean the American public voted for the greatest disruptor in American history.
00:52:21.600I don't understand because we really want to see him successful.
00:52:26.940So how hard is it to get, and I'm just going to pick the most benign of them all, and that was Kennedy's murders because it's so old, right?
00:52:34.260But there's, it's not possible you're revealing sources and methods.
00:52:38.840Like, I don't really see the legitimate impediment to producing these documents after all these years and all these votes by the Congress to do it, multiple executive orders, including this one.
00:52:48.780So they don't produce those documents, which they have not.
00:56:22.340You're a kook if you think that, you know, there's a possibility there was something, some underhanded thing happening behind the curtain.0.98
00:56:31.600I can tell you we can keep a secret.0.95
01:07:18.560The people who provided the information. Yeah.
01:07:20.180gave it to him and you know it to me it's it's insanity um were they upset about this information
01:07:27.180sure seemed like it because you don't send somebody for you don't call somebody up and
01:07:31.540say we'd like you to show up at this facility for an interview and that facility is for polygraphs
01:07:37.060by the way which is basically an interrogation tool and um and say hey listen come on by i mean
01:07:43.340there was a fellow sitting next to me he asked me you know how do i deal with this and i said
01:07:49.300Well, you tell them that you work for the DNI and that you would like them to send a full list of the questions they'd like to talk about, maybe send it to your lawyer, and you make sure you CC everybody in the DNI front office on that email chain because you want them involved in fixing this.
01:08:41.520to have the exact same question so what i'll say about this was um the cia decided that that was
01:08:51.460the end of it and so they put up they made every obstacle they could to try and prevent us from
01:08:59.380conducting our investigations and um it was simply refusing things slow rolling things um you know
01:09:05.680So even within the D&I's Office of General Counsel, there are things that we want to push through there to make sure that we're street legal.
01:09:15.220Somehow, they managed to slow roll even the stuff we were trying to get over to, for example, Senator Rand Paul's committee.
01:09:21.260There was questions and follow-ups that sat with that group for months.
01:09:26.560But on the specific case of January 6th, there are a couple of things that jump out.
01:20:23.100And then Trump gets shot in Butler and then decides to hire Marco Rubio as Secretary of State, Steve Walsh as National Security Advisor, and critically, John Ratcliffe as Director of Central Intelligence.
01:20:37.800And then he wins the election with the majority of the popular vote, and you don't have any of these problems.
01:20:45.100I mean, if this were happening in a foreign country, what would you say?
01:20:48.800I will say part of the reason President Trump won was because he managed to capture the Maha vote, and he should be probably a little more cognizant of what Maha wants.
01:21:01.500He shouldn't be endorsing mRNA technology.