Timcast IRL - Tim Pool - Timcast IRL - Biden Ukraine Corruption SECRETLY RECORDED, Trump VOWS Prosecution w-Straka & Poso

00:00:00.000 As many of you know, Joe Biden was involved in illicit business dealings overseas.

00:00:27.000 One of those illicit business dealings was telling the president of Ukraine that if he didn't fire the prosecutor, he wasn't going to get congressionally approved loan guarantees.

00:00:35.000 And now we know that there's an FBI informant saying that Joe Biden is involved in a criminal bribery scheme.

00:00:40.000 Well, the big news today, the GOP has revealed that this executive at Burisma, has 17 recordings of Joe and Hunter Biden as an insurance policy.

00:00:51.000 So it seems like things are about to get particularly spicy.

00:00:54.000 And I think this is probably as we enter the political season, it's going to make things bad for an already ailing president in terms of his approval rating, which is at a an apocalyptically low rating.

00:01:06.000 Historically, it's not as bad as Carter, but it's the worst we've seen outside of that for the most part.

00:01:11.000 So we'll talk about that, plus we got some other crazy news in the wake of this story being published.

00:01:15.000 What do we have?

00:01:16.000 We have Bongino Report, we've got Post Millennial Inhuman Events, as well as a few other sites being hit by a major DDoS, a cyber attack that's shutting them down.

00:01:25.000 So we'll get into all of that stuff.

00:01:26.000 And Donald Trump says that when he's elected president, he is going to send a special prosecutor after Joe Biden.

00:01:33.000 So, here we go.

00:01:34.000 It's tit for tat.

00:01:35.000 It is...

00:01:37.000 It's on.

00:01:38.000 Before we get started, my friends, head over to PublicSQ.com and download the Public Square app.

00:01:44.000 Why?

00:01:45.000 Stop giving your money to people who hate you.

00:01:48.000 And on top of that, stop giving your money to people who might secretly claim they like you but would never stand up for you.

00:01:55.000 Public Square is America's marketplace.

00:01:57.000 It's an app where businesses can list their business And they pledge to support American values.

00:02:04.000 So you know that when you download this app and you pull up the map, you can see all the businesses in your area that actively support American values.

00:02:11.000 And this is how we build the parallel economy.

00:02:13.000 It's how we push back against woke corporations.

00:02:16.000 And my friends, with apps like Public Square at PublicSQ.com, we are winning.

00:02:22.000 We're seeing all the big boycotts.

00:02:23.000 We're seeing regular people say, enough.

00:02:25.000 The opportunity is now and you can be a part of it simply by downloading this app and providing your business to the companies that don't hate you and actually agree with you.

00:02:34.000 Again, PublicSQ.com.

00:02:36.000 We're big fans.

00:02:37.000 Shout out to Public Square.

00:02:39.000 We love what you guys are doing.

00:02:40.000 And again, download the app.

00:02:42.000 Also, don't forget to go to TimCast.com.

00:02:44.000 Click join us because tonight...

00:02:46.000 We're going to have a members-only uncensored show, and if you sign up for the $10 a month level for at least six months, and if you sign up at $25, you will then be able to ask questions live on the air with us.

00:02:59.000 It's basically a screening process because we have to have some kind of screening process, so we settled on time and or higher money to try and weed out ne'er-do-wells and things like that, but we'd love to see you on the members-only show and supporting us directly. 0.95

00:03:14.000 Joining us tonight to talk about all of this and so much more is Brandon Strzok.

00:03:19.000 What's up?

00:03:20.000 Thanks for having me.

00:03:20.000 It's good to be back.

00:03:21.000 Absolutely.

00:03:21.000 Who are you?

00:03:23.000 I'm doing great.

00:03:24.000 I think this is my fourth or fifth time with you.

00:03:26.000 Yeah.

00:03:26.000 Good to be back.

00:03:27.000 Who?

00:03:28.000 Oh, who am I?

00:03:30.000 I don't know what it is.

00:03:31.000 Brandon Strzok, founder of the WalkAway campaign.

00:03:34.000 Yeah, the movement of people walking away from the Democratic Party and WalkAway Social, our app.

00:03:38.000 Right on.

00:03:39.000 Thanks for hanging out.

00:03:39.000 And of course, Jack Posobiec.

00:03:42.000 Been a minute, Tim.

00:03:42.000 It's been a minute.

00:03:43.000 Jack Posobiec, the host of Human Events, senior editor of a website that no one can get to because we are currently under what I am told by my tech guys, a deliberate attempt to take down humanevents.com, also a prior Navy intelligence officer.

00:03:59.000 And I think we might be talking about a little bit of how intelligence reporting works today.

00:04:03.000 It seems like the attack on Human Events, Post Memorial, Banjina Report, a couple other websites, may be related to this GOP report about Biden and these secret recordings.

00:04:13.000 So what I'm told, and I'm just looking because we're in a highly super-secret group chat here, That basically the minute we posted, the minute we published the report from this, and so people understand this is a, this is an FBI informant file that Grassley read on the floor of the Senate.

00:04:34.000 And when you and Tim, I know you know this, that when a sitting member of Congress or the Senate reads out something, even if it's classified, they cannot be prosecuted for releasing that because they're doing so on the floor of the Senate.

00:04:48.000 He uses his ability to do that as a senator to come out and say that there are 15 recordings with Hunter Biden and two of Joe Biden when he was the vice president describing all this.

00:05:00.000 Long story short, we put out the article summarizing all of that.

00:05:04.000 The whole site goes down.

00:05:06.000 So, Human Events owns Post Millennial. 0.80

00:05:09.000 Human Events goes down.

00:05:10.000 Post Millennial goes down. 0.54

00:05:12.000 We're also told Bongino Report is going down.

00:05:14.000 Some of these are coming up.

00:05:15.000 There's a few other sites.

00:05:16.000 Alright, pulling up.

00:05:17.000 Up and down.

00:05:17.000 DC Inquirer.

00:05:18.000 It's been up and down.

00:05:19.000 It's been up and down and Bungie reports down.

00:05:21.000 But we'll get into all this.

00:05:21.000 And I'm not going to say the name, but I will say that we are not on Amazon web servers.

00:05:25.000 So this is not Amazon.

00:05:27.000 So we will definitely get into all that.

00:05:28.000 Of course, Ian's here.

00:05:29.000 What's up, everybody?

00:05:29.000 Ian Crossland, happy to be here.

00:05:31.000 Let's move it along.

00:05:33.000 Yeah, and I'm Serge.com, and I think we should just get started.

00:05:36.000 We got a lot to cover.

00:05:37.000 Let's get into it.

00:05:38.000 We got the story from the Washington Examiner.

00:05:40.000 Joe and Hunter Biden caught on 17 recordings with Burisma owner Grassley reveals FBI form.

00:05:47.000 Grassley reveals, FBI form says.

00:05:49.000 I love that.

00:05:50.000 That should be a semicolon and not a comma after the word owner right there.

00:05:54.000 Yeah, so we can understand the context.

00:05:56.000 Grassley is not the owner.

00:05:58.000 Grassley is revealing that there is an FBI informant saying this.

00:06:02.000 Right.

00:06:03.000 And so this is official intel to the FBI now being released to the public.

00:06:08.000 A top Senate Republican revealed Monday that an FBI informant said the Ukrainian oligarch involved in an alleged criminal bribery scheme with Joe and Hunter Biden also claimed to have 17 recordings of his conversations with the president and his son.

00:06:20.000 Grassley revealed on the Senate floor that a largely unredacted version of the Bureau's FD1023 confidential human source form said that the foreign national who allegedly bribed Joe and Hunter Biden allegedly has audio recordings of his conversations with them, 17 such recordings.

00:06:37.000 I want to pause right now and say, Okay, the bribery thing is really interesting.

00:06:43.000 But what we can't say for sure is that Joe Biden admitted publicly, on camera, that he threatened to illegally withhold congressionally approved loan guarantees to Ukraine unless they fired a prosecutor.

00:06:55.000 As we now know that prosecutor was investigating Burisma.

00:06:59.000 So here we are.

00:07:00.000 I guess the, correct me if I'm wrong, Jack, the bribery was that they went to Joe and said, get the prosecutor fired.

00:07:07.000 Well, and to be clear, the investigation was, so the guy's name is Mikola Zlochevsky, and so Zlochevsky is the oligarch who is in control of Burisma.

00:07:19.000 He was under investigation domestically in Ukraine.

00:07:22.000 And by the way, yes, the same Ukraine that has the war, that's been on fire, that seems like dominates all of the conversation over the last six years, when prior to the last six years, I don't even know the last time any of us even talked about Ukraine, right?

00:07:37.000 Trump's impeachment, the war, the coup in 2014, suddenly Ukraine is like everywhere. 0.97

00:07:46.000 He was under investigation for bribery inside Ukraine.

00:07:50.000 Then he goes and hires Joe Biden's son, which we know publicly, he goes and hires Joe Biden's son.

00:07:55.000 Joe Biden gets the prosecutor fired.

00:07:58.000 Then he said he's bribing Joe Biden to stop the guy who was investigating him for bribery in the first place.

00:08:06.000 Okay, so Tchaikovsky is this post-oligarch that's in control of Burisma? 0.86

00:08:11.000 Yes.

00:08:11.000 He's the guy that hired Hunter Biden?

00:08:15.000 Yes.

00:08:16.000 And then he bribed Joe Biden to get a prosecutor fired to stop investigating his company?

00:08:24.000 Well, so according to these reports, it seems as though the hiring of Hunter Biden coincided with, and again, based on the report, I interviewed Marjorie Taylor Greene, who has seen a copy of the report.

00:08:37.000 She also gave me some more information stating that this confidential human source, or CHS as they say in the parlance, is someone who was one of their most highly credible.

00:08:48.000 This isn't just some walk-in, some random guy.

00:08:50.000 Hey, I heard about Joe Biden and the, uh, you know, by the way, so there's, there's a whole process.

00:08:55.000 And I remember what, even when I was an Intel agent, you know, your Intel officer that there's this question of how do you know that the source knows?

00:09:03.000 Well, you're constantly vetting placement and access.

00:09:05.000 You're constantly vetting, uh, credibility or you can go back and check, you know, did a person actually go to this place where they said they were, can you check, can you geo track them, et cetera, et cetera.

00:09:14.000 So there's a huge process that the FBI is running on this person to make sure that the reports that they're giving are credible.

00:09:21.000 Which, by the way, could also include recordings of, you know, wearing a wire, right?

00:09:25.000 As we all know from movies, etc.

00:09:28.000 So the idea is that this informant is giving that report to the FBI and saying that this hiring of Hunter, which we knew publicly, coincided with not one but two Five million dollar payments, one to Hunter Biden and one to the big guy.

00:09:46.000 So these recordings, how many?

00:09:47.000 Through shell companies.

00:09:48.000 How many of the recordings were Biden and how many were Joe and how many were Hunter?

00:09:52.000 Two Joe, 15 Hunter.

00:09:54.000 That makes sense to me because, you know, Hunter's the one who's actually working in Burisma.

00:09:57.000 He's there.

00:09:58.000 Right.

00:09:58.000 Probably having a lot of conversations.

00:10:00.000 Check this out.

00:10:01.000 They say, the examiner says, sources previously told the Washington examiner that the Burisma owner discussed an alleged bribe of five million dollars to Joe Biden.

00:10:09.000 There's clever ways they can run this.

00:10:10.000 Biden, according to the paid FBI informant who said he heard

00:10:14.000 this from Zlochevsky.

00:10:15.000 The sources said Zlochevsky said he believed it would be difficult to unravel the alleged bribery scheme for at

00:10:21.000 least 10 years because of the number of bank accounts involved.

00:10:24.000 There's clever ways they can run this.

00:10:26.000 They could do something like look, I've got a company in this

00:10:30.000 country that runs a couple subsidiaries that harvest wheat.

00:10:34.000 We'll have those companies hire you as a consultant through your investment firm so it looks clean and on the level.

00:10:41.000 That's how they play this game.

00:10:42.000 Then you get, like, multiple bank accounts involved where money's being transferred all around, and then you've got to prove the transfers were specifically for the bribe.

00:10:50.000 So it's very difficult.

00:10:51.000 Unless you have them on audio tape talking about what they're doing and how they're doing it.

00:10:56.000 Well, also, unless you're the FBI, which literally exists to... I mean, the FBI has...

00:11:03.000 agents that are specifically tasked with working with the U.S.

00:11:06.000 Treasury Department to actually go after and unravel those very same shell games that you're talking about.

00:11:12.000 And so what's so shocking to me is that we're seeing now, even in the report, Grassley alleges that when they first went to the FBI and asked to see the Hunter Biden file, that there were portions that were redacted relating to these audio files, that the FBI redacted that before they gave that report to Congress.

00:11:32.000 Wow.

00:11:33.000 So the FBI was actually trying to and now they're gonna claim right of course the FBI will say well That's because of our informant.

00:11:39.000 That's because it came from the informant, but here's the thing You don't need to say that in the report that it came from an informant.

00:11:46.000 You can just say the FBI has information.

00:11:48.000 And the FBI, as we know, has multiple ways of receiving information.

00:11:52.000 And so their redacting that clearly raises a huge red flag of all sorts of issues, not to mention separation of powers, not to mention the administrative state versus the elected representatives.

00:12:04.000 And you really have to go back and say, look, I know a lot of people were Let's say, I'm trying to be nice here, skeptical or at least not sure of Kevin McCarthy, the House GOP in general, they said, are these guys actually going to do anything?

00:12:17.000 Are we actually going to get information out?

00:12:19.000 And I would say, look, I mean, say what you want about, you know, certain fights, certain hills to die on, et cetera, that we would not have this information right now if the Bothans, right now, if the House GOP had not brought it to us.

00:12:32.000 Tim, I know you got that reference.

00:12:34.000 Well, one more time.

00:12:35.000 I said, I said, I said, uh, shout out to all the boffins who died, who to bring his glorious spy network.

00:12:40.000 Let me, uh, I want to, I want to read this.

00:12:42.000 This is a very important paragraph in the story.

00:12:44.000 Trump and his Republican allies claim Joe Biden improperly used his position as vice president to pressure Ukraine to fire Shokin to protect his son from an investigation into Burisma.

00:12:54.000 Democrats deny this and argue the focus on Burisma was part of an effort to dirty up Joe Biden.

00:12:58.000 Well, hold on.

00:12:59.000 Everything in that paragraph is true.

00:13:00.000 I don't understand.

00:13:03.000 This is the same- Keep in mind- Let me just clarify it.

00:13:07.000 So, when Trump and other Republicans investigate Joe Biden for overt and obvious corruption, it does in fact dirty him up in the election, and I'm sure that played a role in why they would do it.

00:13:20.000 You mean kind of like arresting your leading opponent?

00:13:23.000 Right, right.

00:13:24.000 All they're doing is they're saying Democrats deny it, but argue a part of why they would do it, which, okay.

00:13:31.000 Look, if you are running for office and you find out that your opponent is a criminal, you would absolutely be like, we must defeat this person because they're a criminal and we can't let them run this country.

00:13:42.000 So yes, a component of what you're doing is we need to expose the dirt on Joe Biden.

00:13:47.000 It's real.

00:13:49.000 This is the exact same thing that all the way back in 2019, and some of these names, maybe not Zelchevsky, but I think people have probably heard the name Burisma a lot by now.

00:13:59.000 And, you know, even at a general level, these are the same exact companies and names that came up in that infamous perfect phone call between Trump and Vladimir Zelensky, right?

00:14:10.000 The same Vladimir Zelensky.

00:14:12.000 I got my Zelensky shirt on today.

00:14:13.000 You know, I see you guys aren't rocking.

00:14:17.000 You're close, you're close.

00:14:18.000 You're showing the guns off.

00:14:22.000 But there's this idea that when Trump was talking to Zelensky and he was asking him, hey, I've heard about all of these things.

00:14:30.000 I've been watching the news.

00:14:31.000 I've been seeing that Joe Biden obviously at one point literally bragged about it on national TV that he got the guy fired.

00:14:40.000 And he's saying, look, you're in Ukraine.

00:14:42.000 You're the president of Ukraine.

00:14:44.000 Could you look into this?

00:14:46.000 Could you make a few phone calls?

00:14:47.000 Could you see what's going on?

00:14:49.000 They impeached President Trump for just asking the question about this right here, which we now know.

00:14:56.000 Keep in mind, Tim, that at the time that they did the impeachment, the FBI had all these reports on file and not a single one of them came forward and said, well, actually what President Trump is talking about is something that we have on file.

00:15:11.000 There is a criminal syndicate in the government.

00:15:14.000 I mean, I don't know how many I don't know, you know, but we know that the FBI is purposefully not prosecuting certain individuals.

00:15:21.000 And so whoever is instructing these people to do this is part of some kind of criminal syndicate.

00:15:26.000 I'm not trying to make it seem like there's a network of thousands of people with initiation or anything like that.

00:15:30.000 I'm saying certain elements of the FBI, the executive branch and the Democratic Party are absolutely subverting the law in this country in collusion with each other.

00:15:41.000 End of story.

00:15:42.000 There was that, you see that clip out of CNN?

00:15:44.000 Where the guys are like, Hillary Clinton had the cell phone smashed with hammers!

00:15:48.000 And then I think it was Alison Camerota, she's like, can we, no, no, can we get a fact check on that?

00:15:52.000 And the guy goes, yes, the Hillary team did have phones smashed with hammers and servers wiped. 1.00

00:16:00.000 And she's like, oh, you mean like with the towel? 1.00

00:16:03.000 Whoops.

00:16:04.000 It is funny when I hear people say like, Didn't Hillary Clinton pour bleach on her computer?

00:16:08.000 And it's like, oh, geez, man.

00:16:10.000 Like the the bleach bit.

00:16:11.000 Bleach bit was an app, was a program to purge a hard drive.

00:16:15.000 Which the guy found on Reddit.

00:16:17.000 Yeah, that was funny.

00:16:18.000 Was that what it was?

00:16:19.000 Well, nobody posted saying, like, I need help.

00:16:22.000 And they found his posts on the subreddit.

00:16:25.000 He's talking about, I'm working for a very important individual who really, really needs something deleted.

00:16:32.000 It is crazy to me that Donald Trump is facing a federal indictment despite the fact that Hillary Clinton did substantially worse for a fact.

00:16:42.000 We know she had classified documents in her private server that she kept. 0.55

00:16:46.000 And it was destroyed.

00:16:48.000 And all of those emails, the 30 plus thousand that we know of, were public records that she destroyed.

00:16:54.000 And nothing happened.

00:16:56.000 And she posted that picture of her hat, but her emails and smiling.

00:16:59.000 It's like they broke the law.

00:17:01.000 They got away with it.

00:17:02.000 And now that Trump's getting arrested, they want you to know that they will keep committing crimes and nothing will be done.

00:17:09.000 That's why I was talking to Jack before the show and I'm like, well, what's the next, like, what's this long game going to be?

00:17:13.000 Are they going to come out in the media and be like, but you guys, Joe Biden had to get the prosecutor fired.

00:17:19.000 Otherwise we wouldn't have had any protection against Russia when they invaded Ukraine.

00:17:24.000 We all, we did all this manipulation for your own good.

00:17:26.000 Like if they're just going to one day just...

00:17:28.000 Flip the lights on, admit it all, and say it was for your own good.

00:17:31.000 And then 90% of the population will just believe it with their jaws slacked.

00:17:35.000 That's my fear.

00:17:36.000 Well, you're right.

00:17:37.000 You're actually right about that.

00:17:39.000 That's always been the playbook when it comes to one of these things.

00:17:41.000 Because the first time you say it, it's, well, that's a conspiracy.

00:17:44.000 That's not happening.

00:17:45.000 And as Tim pointed out, that some of them are actually getting it wrong, and they're still pulling that out for The email server when actually we've gone past that one.

00:17:54.000 So the first thing they do is they say it's a conspiracy.

00:17:56.000 Then the next thing they do is they say it's contested.

00:17:58.000 Then the third thing they do is they say, well, this helps Republicans and that's the only reason Republicans are going after it.

00:18:03.000 And then finally, once you've completely proven something beyond the shadow of a doubt, they'll say, well, okay, it is happening, but it's good.

00:18:11.000 It's happening and it's happening and it's good.

00:18:12.000 And here's why it's good for the country and everyone.

00:18:14.000 That's why it's happening.

00:18:15.000 and how dare you stand against us for letting this happen.

00:18:18.000 So I don't know if that's exactly the reason they'll give, but I think you're 100% right in

00:18:23.000 that they will at some point come out and say, you know, these payments were made for the betterment

00:18:27.000 of Ukraine, the security of Ukraine, and Hunter Biden was secretly working on, you know, an

00:18:32.000 exchange program for certain forms of Ukrainian women on a, on a, a need to know and a special,

00:18:41.000 special access visa, you know, for the really, you know, high talent. People will come to me then

00:18:46.000 I'm trying to, to, you know, shadow campaign this myself in a few months, they'll come to me

00:18:51.000 whenever, after this comes out and they'll be like, but Ian, it was good that what they did

00:18:55.000 with, with Biden, with the getting people fired. And I'll be like, now I've got to figure out how to

00:19:00.000 explain to them why it's not. I I need to be so laser focused, I need to know Mikolaj Zlochevskiy inside and out, Viktor Shokin inside and out.

00:19:08.000 These names, Mikolaj Zlochevskiy, Viktor Shokin.

00:19:10.000 We have talked about those two guys, maybe like 500 times.

00:19:14.000 And I tell you, it's like I hear it, it's like it's washing over my brain every time.

00:19:17.000 Russian guys, Ukrainian names, words like Burisma, Viktor Shokin, Mikhail Zlochevsky.

00:19:27.000 Zlochevsky was an oligarch that owned Burisma.

00:19:30.000 Correct.

00:19:31.000 Correct.

00:19:31.000 Fled the country, uh, during these investigations.

00:19:34.000 Met type reported around a dozen, I believe.

00:19:37.000 And, uh, Biden comes in and gets the prosecutor fired.

00:19:40.000 Which was Victor Shokin, the prosecutor.

00:19:41.000 Victor Shokin.

00:19:42.000 So these are the names.

00:19:43.000 Victor Shokin signed a sworn affidavit saying that he was fired because of Joe Biden.

00:19:48.000 That the Ukrainian officials came to him and said, we have no choice.

00:19:51.000 Biden said, we have to fire you.

00:19:52.000 Maybe he swore, he swore to this.

00:19:55.000 There's also, and this is coming back around again, that there's audio that was released by OAN years ago.

00:20:03.000 Of phone calls between Biden and not Zelensky, but Poroshenko, who was the previous president of Ukraine, Petro Poroshenko, prior to, they call him the chocolate man, the candy man, because he ran a, he was like sort of a chocolate oligarch.

00:20:18.000 And he's still around, by the way.

00:20:20.000 He's still a member of the parliament there.

00:20:23.000 And he's the one who ran against Zelensky in 19.

00:20:26.000 Anyway, in those calls at one point, Poroshenko says to Biden, There is nothing?

00:20:33.000 That we have found that shows that Shokin is corrupt.

00:20:37.000 We have no information that says he's doing anything wrong, but if you want us to do this, we will do it.

00:20:45.000 And Biden's pushing him saying, we need to do this.

00:20:47.000 And there's a bank and the Kolomoisky's bank needs to be taken care of, et cetera, et cetera.

00:20:51.000 And what happens after the prosecutor is fired?

00:20:54.000 Zlochevsky returns to Ukraine.

00:20:57.000 And what happened after Donald Trump makes the infamous phone call?

00:21:00.000 He flees once again.

00:21:03.000 Once he knew, he was like, uh-oh, uh-oh, they're going to start looking into me again.

00:21:07.000 And Joe Biden was like, we got someone in there who was good.

00:21:11.000 Yeah, good.

00:21:11.000 But then what's the next step?

00:21:13.000 What's the next step there?

00:21:17.000 What do the oligarchs then do? 0.79

00:21:18.000 So Kolomoisky is the other oligarch who's working with Tseltschevsky at this point, has the bank, is sort of the financial end, if you look at it that way.

00:21:27.000 He has got the bank.

00:21:30.000 Biden saying, I know this guy, you know, he's kind of an a-hole, etc, etc.

00:21:34.000 But we got to deal with him.

00:21:34.000 We got to deal with him.

00:21:36.000 That was the bank that received the IMF money.

00:21:39.000 So those oligarchs come in and say, look, we still got this problem with the presidency, etc, etc.

00:21:45.000 And, you know, now Trump's in, what do we do?

00:21:47.000 So they say, what if we can bankroll our own president here in Ukraine?

00:21:54.000 And that same oligarch ran a TV network.

00:21:59.000 And on that TV network, they had a very popular TV show called Servant of the People, all about a teacher, like a public school teacher who essentially becomes the president.

00:22:10.000 That actor Did he have any political acumen before Zelensky?

00:22:14.000 No.

00:22:14.000 He was just an actor?

00:22:15.000 And they were like, you're good enough?

00:22:18.000 You have a good smile?

00:22:19.000 He played the president on TV and they were like, works!

00:22:21.000 Did he have any political acumen before?

00:22:23.000 No.

00:22:25.000 He was just an actor and they were like, you're good enough.

00:22:27.000 You have a good smile.

00:22:28.000 It was a comedian and then an actor and he played the president on TV and they were like,

00:22:32.000 works.

00:22:33.000 Right.

00:22:33.000 Let's jump to this next story.

00:22:35.000 It was the same oligarchs that are being discussed on this phone call with Biden.

00:22:40.000 There is hope, my friends!

00:22:42.000 We have this report from TimCast.com.

00:22:44.000 Trump vows to appoint special prosecutor to go after Biden if elected, saying, Now that the seal is broken, in addition to closing the border and removing all of the criminal elements that have illegally invaded our country, making America energy independent and even dominant again, and immediately ending the war between Russia and Ukraine, I will appoint a real special prosecutor to go after the most corrupt president in the history of the U.S., Joe Biden, the entire Biden crime family, and all others involved with the destruction of our elections, borders, and country itself.

00:23:15.000 Election interference at a level never seen before in our country, in a subsequent post.

00:23:20.000 So, now that we know that Trump is being charged, and the seal has been broken, as you said, in more ways than one.

00:23:26.000 The seal has been broken.

00:23:27.000 Well, this is it.

00:23:28.000 Yeah.

00:23:29.000 There's no way out of it now.

00:23:31.000 The next time a Republican gets elected, it's going to be political lawfare. 100%.

00:23:37.000 And it has to be because, you know, when he kind of campaigned on this whole, lock her up, we're going to go after Hillary Clinton.

00:23:42.000 And then I think he got elected and he went for this thing, like, let's be compassionate.

00:23:46.000 Let's unite the country.

00:23:47.000 Let's bring people together.

00:23:48.000 And it was a huge mistake.

00:23:49.000 I mean, look exactly what you're doing.

00:23:51.000 Yeah.

00:23:52.000 And I don't think I'll make that.

00:23:53.000 Yeah.

00:23:54.000 I think that mistake will be made again.

00:23:57.000 Jack?

00:23:57.000 Yeah.

00:23:59.000 Getting a report now from my guys at Postmillennial.

00:24:02.000 They're saying the sites are back up.

00:24:04.000 They've got all the information from the bombshell story that resulted in a DDoS attack.

00:24:10.000 Postmillennial Human Events.

00:24:12.000 Make sure you go subscribe, by the way, to make sure that we can fend off the next DDoS attack.

00:24:17.000 Great opportunity for a plug, by the way.

00:24:18.000 But yeah, we pull up Postmillennial quite a bit on the show and we have Libby on quite a bit.

00:24:18.000 All right.

00:24:22.000 And we appreciate it.

00:24:23.000 What happened is before the show, I'm like, you know, let's see what the Post Millennial is on about and it wasn't working.

00:24:28.000 And then Jack's like, well, we just put out these big stories and sure enough, but back to Donald Trump.

00:24:32.000 I thought it was arresting point.

00:24:34.000 And yeah, no, it was too big, too big.

00:24:36.000 But Trump's gonna go after Joe Biden.

00:24:38.000 So obviously, you know, Brandon and I are in agreement.

00:24:41.000 Jack, I'm curious, what do you think?

00:24:45.000 It's gone too far.

00:24:47.000 You know, it's really gone too far at this point where you've got a situation where this, and keep in mind that it's not just, if you think it's just Joe Biden and Hunter Biden that are taking foreign money in the United States government, you've got, if you want to be serious about this, and I would say, As a way to take this out of the necessarily left-right dichotomy of it, Democrats are going after Republicans.

00:25:11.000 So Biden and all his guys are going after Trump and they're saying, oh, you didn't say it was declassified, even though he's the president, he has declassification ability.

00:25:20.000 They're going after him for all this stuff that we already know that Hillary got away with.

00:25:25.000 To take it out of that, I would say that you don't just need the special prosecutor for Biden.

00:25:30.000 Do that, obviously, because we've got way too much information now.

00:25:33.000 Plus, by the way, apparently there was an investigation that, for whatever reason, this level, the highest levels of the FBI, are protecting the Bidens.

00:25:43.000 Even though we know that they already have this information.

00:25:45.000 They had the information when President Trump was asking about it.

00:25:48.000 They wouldn't give it to him.

00:25:49.000 He goes and asks Ukraine about it because he's like, well, if I can't get it from my side, I'm going to ask the other side because he's a problem solver, right?

00:25:56.000 You know, he's a pragmatic guy, businessman that we need an entire commission.

00:26:01.000 I think we need a federal commission about foreign money that's going in.

00:26:04.000 This is something where, look, If you are a Bernie Sanders supporter, or I guess these days you would say an RFK supporter, and you are actually concerned about money in politics, wouldn't it be a massive issue if there were foreign oligarchs and foreign funds that were paying into our politics and shouldn't we know about that?

00:26:21.000 And it's probably worse than just that.

00:26:22.000 I mean, I'd imagine the Chinese Communist Party is...

00:26:26.000 heavily investing in political candidates, and they can do it through very special ways.

00:26:31.000 They can give money to a corporation that does, as I was mentioning earlier...

00:26:37.000 Dianne Feinstein turned this into a cottage industry for her and her husband. 0.99

00:26:41.000 It's not so easy to prove these things.

00:26:43.000 A company that sells sombreros in China sends two million dollars to a company that, you know, makes a specific fiber they use, and they say, here's what we do.

00:26:56.000 We have that company double its order, so it looks totally normal.

00:26:59.000 Then that company does the fibering, hires a few consultants at a couple hundred thousand dollars, who then hire this plumber, and so it all looks legitimate, and how do you know which one was the bride?

00:27:09.000 They do these things in Chicago all the time.

00:27:11.000 Hey, hey, you know that contract that's coming up?

00:27:14.000 Get us that contract for, you know, this amount of money, and then I'll talk to my brother, and we'll make sure that he buys from you next time, and then that's kickbacks.

00:27:21.000 That's how it all works.

00:27:22.000 So China can say, we're gonna buy X product from your company, so long as X amounts of those dollars go to this political action committee through you, because we can't legally do it, and no one will be able to prove it.

00:27:32.000 Well, or just looking at the Feinstein situation.

00:27:35.000 So Senator Feinstein in California was one.

00:27:39.000 So she's green energy, right?

00:27:41.000 She's climate change. 1.00

00:27:43.000 We have to protect the environment.

00:27:44.000 What did she do? 0.80

00:27:45.000 She used legislation and she championed legislation in this country to prevent the development of Rare earth elements within the United States, that we are not going to go after those.

00:27:58.000 We are going to protect them.

00:27:59.000 We're going to leave this, this sacred land exactly the way it is exactly.

00:28:04.000 Whereas meanwhile, what's her husband doing?

00:28:05.000 Her husband is being given deals in China with the exact same companies that are going after rare earth elements and then purchasing those resources and the mineral rights all around the world for China.

00:28:17.000 How did they corner the market?

00:28:18.000 They cornered the senators first.

00:28:20.000 Yep.

00:28:21.000 Man, what were you going to say?

00:28:23.000 I was going to say Trump's got to arrest all of them, not just Biden.

00:28:26.000 This is my feeling about what Trump's saying.

00:28:28.000 He's like, when I get back into office, I'm going to arrest them.

00:28:31.000 I'm going to set things right. 0.91

00:28:32.000 And what it feels like is a story of like, he came in the first time, he's like, all these poisonous snakes, I'm going to kill all these snakes and make it snake.

00:28:39.000 And we'll be like, we're like, okay, good.

00:28:40.000 Less poisonous snakes.

00:28:41.000 He went in, he didn't destroy the snakes.

00:28:43.000 And then he got bit by one and now he's poisoned.

00:28:46.000 And he's like, when I get back in, I'm going to kill all the snakes.

00:28:48.000 And you're like, dude, Relax, rest. 0.94

00:28:51.000 You've been poisoned.

00:28:52.000 They're already hitting him with 70 plus federal felony charges.

00:28:56.000 Dude, you're in no position to run for president right now.

00:28:58.000 Because they're terrified of him.

00:28:59.000 He's absolutely in the position to run.

00:28:59.000 I know.

00:29:01.000 He's in a position where they can take him off the ballot if he's being indicted for felonies.

00:29:04.000 There's a reason that nobody else is being targeted like this.

00:29:07.000 I mean, I think that the Trump movement singularly represents the most viable anti-establishment movement in this country, and because it attained critical mass, that's the reason you're seeing this pathogen-like response to it by the system that you're

00:29:26.000 seeing. You'll see Republicans and Democrats will link arms, the Bushes and

00:29:31.000 the Clintons and the Obamas, to go after Trump because they know that he's the

00:29:36.000 one person that actually represents a threat to them on a much grander

00:29:40.000 And by the way, if he wasn't leading in all the polls, but CBS YouGov has him up, what, 38 points or something right now?

00:29:40.000 scale.

00:29:47.000 It's not exactly like a pro-Trump poll.

00:29:50.000 He's leading Biden in many national polls.

00:29:52.000 I think if he wasn't leading, you wouldn't see these charges.

00:29:55.000 You wouldn't see anything about him.

00:29:57.000 That would fit more the, hey, let's let this guy go out to pasture kind of model.

00:30:01.000 You think he's too damaged?

00:30:03.000 Well, I think not psychologically, mentally, anything like that.

00:30:06.000 Just he's in a legal state right now where he's going to have a hard time getting his name on a ballot.

00:30:11.000 But that's the point.

00:30:13.000 Yeah, exactly.

00:30:14.000 So what do you mean getting his name on the ballot?

00:30:16.000 Well, from what I understand, if he's indicted for federal charges and then found guilty on any of them, they can take his name off the ballots.

00:30:23.000 Is that not right?

00:30:23.000 That's not true.

00:30:24.000 Well, some people are saying that the indictment states will make moves to remove his name from the ballot.

00:30:28.000 He can still run.

00:30:30.000 He can still be elected.

00:30:31.000 He can pardon himself.

00:30:33.000 I don't know if it's true, but people have chatted to us saying that.

00:30:35.000 So, there's two pieces to this.

00:30:39.000 One is that, so the only thing that can prevent you from being president is an impeachment.

00:30:44.000 Like, fully prevent you from being president is impeachment.

00:30:46.000 It's the only thing the Constitution says.

00:30:47.000 But you mean conviction, right?

00:30:49.000 Impeachment and conviction.

00:30:50.000 Impeachment and conviction, yes.

00:30:51.000 A fully carried through conviction and impeachment, which has never happened by the way in US history.

00:30:57.000 Then the other piece of it, which I think is this sort of loophole that they tried to do this with Marjorie Taylor Greene and they were attempting to do with Madison Cawthorn down in North Carolina, was these Civil War era laws that are on the books in some of the states that say if you were a member of an insurrection, That you can no longer hold office in the United States and that these laws do apply in these states.

00:31:24.000 They were written obviously for Confederates to say that, okay, if you had been some official in the Confederacy, now Georgia has been admitted back to the Union, Mississippi, et cetera, Alabama, that you can't go and run for office again because you were part of that.

00:31:39.000 So what they're trying to do is apply that.

00:31:42.000 So if, and I believe they will, by the way, like this, this indictment tomorrow on Trump, Um, is not going to be the only one.

00:31:49.000 They are going to continue on with the indictment in Georgia over, you know, find the votes, which, you know, it's like just Trump talking a phone call.

00:31:56.000 And then I do believe that they're going to go after and brand.

00:31:59.000 Obviously, you've got more information on this.

00:32:01.000 They're going to take.

00:32:03.000 Those Proud Boy and Oath Keeper indictments for seditious conspiracy.

00:32:07.000 And they're going to, and Julie Kelly's talked about this as well, so I'm not going to say this isn't 100% my idea, that they're going to just switch the names for President Trump because that then, by the way, in a DC district, would trigger those laws in those states and set up a I mean, we're obviously in uncharted territory, like massive uncharted territory here in terms of all of these things.

00:32:30.000 But it would set up a huge legal challenge for him.

00:32:33.000 Now, when they did this with Marjorie Taylor Greene, the judge basically ruled for her 100%.

00:32:39.000 But Marjorie Taylor Greene had never been indicted and convicted of anything that would be considered an insurrection.

00:32:45.000 In fact, up until this sadistic conspiracy case, no one had been charged with anything that would be Considered even close to that.

00:32:53.000 And so the idea being is that is there a possibility?

00:32:56.000 I mean, it's some like insane figment of a Blue Anon type deranged conspiracy, but that's literally how far they're willing to go to try to stop Trump. 0.82

00:33:07.000 There's a smaller story besides Proud Boys and Oath Keepers that's already happened that a lot of people don't know about because there's not enough reporting on January 6th.

00:33:17.000 There's a J6-er named Coy Griffin. 0.89

00:33:19.000 He was a city councilman in New Mexico.

00:33:24.000 And he got a misdemeanor charge, didn't go inside the Capitol on January 6.

00:33:29.000 And I really want people to pay attention to this.

00:33:30.000 So if you're watching and listening, look it up and share it.

00:33:33.000 But he was a city councilman in New Mexico, got a misdemeanor charge for standing outside the Capitol, didn't go inside the building.

00:33:40.000 But the Democrats in New Mexico went after him to have him removed from office for this very reason.

00:33:46.000 And the judge went for it.

00:33:47.000 And he was actually removed from his position for being involved in insurrection.

00:33:52.000 And so he's now having to appeal that, but the point is that the precedent has already

00:33:56.000 been set.

00:33:57.000 Yes, we have.

00:33:58.000 We've now removed somebody from office for insurrection connected to January 6th.

00:34:03.000 So that's we have precedent for that now.

00:34:05.000 And of course, they're going to do that to Donald.

00:34:06.000 No, I think you're exactly right.

00:34:07.000 I think I think this is what it's so you know, people look at some of these J6 cases and 1.00

00:34:11.000 they'll say, OK, this is a one off.

00:34:13.000 No, no, no.

00:34:14.000 They're building towards this.

00:34:16.000 They're building towards the precedent and they're moving slowly and slowly and slowly to get to the point where, and by the way, this case down in Miami, they know this is a weak case.

00:34:28.000 Plus they also know that because of the district, the jury pool down there,

00:34:31.000 which is an area that almost went for Trump in 20, that decisively went for DeSantis in 22.

00:34:37.000 I mean, you try and tell me that you're not gonna pull 12 people

00:34:41.000 and not at least get a couple of like based Cuban, you know, Miami Cuban guys on there that are like,

00:34:46.000 look, we saw this in communist Cuba.

00:34:49.000 We know exactly what you're doing.

00:34:50.000 We're not gonna go along with this.

00:34:51.000 You'll see jury nullification.

00:34:52.000 You'll definitely get a chance of that.

00:34:54.000 In DC, you never will.

00:34:55.000 Not if your name is Donald Trump.

00:34:57.000 And this is the big challenge.

00:34:59.000 The jurisdictions are everything.

00:35:01.000 The political and cultural bifurcation in this country is so near-absolute that if...

00:35:08.000 You can have any liberal district just be like, we'll indict them. 0.96

00:35:11.000 They can indict you for anything.

00:35:13.000 Some random liberal district in Washington can indict anyone and then just, you can indict a ham sandwich.

00:35:20.000 And then the people in that district will convict because they don't care about any kind of constitution, community, or laws.

00:35:27.000 They will just say, now you're guilty.

00:35:28.000 So that's why we talk about Trump and these indictments.

00:35:31.000 I'm asking people, do you really think a New York jury is going to acquit Donald Trump?

00:35:35.000 You really think a D.C.

00:35:37.000 jury will acquit Donald?

00:35:38.000 Well, he's going to be in Miami.

00:35:39.000 So that's a maybe, for sure.

00:35:41.000 Miami, I would say he's got a 50-50 chance.

00:35:41.000 Right.

00:35:44.000 Probably even stronger than that, because there's no... Keep in mind that Miami, even though that's where the court is, the district itself is actually bigger than just Miami-Dade County.

00:35:52.000 the Southern District of Florida.

00:35:52.000 Right.

00:35:54.000 So you've got, I mean, remember how many people moved down because of COVID, et cetera.

00:35:58.000 We all know the story, right?

00:35:59.000 And the trending of Latinos and the legalized Venezuelans that have gone there, the Cubans.

00:36:04.000 So I think he stands a pretty strong fighting chant in that area, just based on the jury pool demographics.

00:36:11.000 But look at the rape civil trial in New York.

00:36:13.000 You had a guy on that jury who even said he had seen a few episodes of Timcast, 0.93

00:36:18.000 still saying that Donald Trump is responsible for raping that woman in the most insane story we've ever 0.99

00:36:24.000 heard. 0.99

00:36:24.000 Yes. 0.99

00:36:25.000 So you look at New York, and I'm like, bro, they're gonna convict him, and the judge is going to say jail time.

00:36:31.000 I don't see a scenario where a judge is like, well, now hold on, Donald Trump's a good guy, so we're not gonna lock him up.

00:36:36.000 New York is a very bad venue for Donald Trump, but it's not as bad as D.C., I don't think.

00:36:43.000 And he's actually more popular in New York than people think.

00:36:47.000 I mean, overwhelmingly, people are against him there, but he's more popular than people think.

00:36:52.000 No, I don't I don't see so first what will happen is the jurors identities will get leaked and Then the judge will probably be like who cares something like that will happen Then you're going to hear story like no juror who is entering the courthouse to pass judgment on Donald Trump to issue a verdict is going to Whether they like Trump or not, I just don't see it happening.

00:37:16.000 The reason that one guy probably said, yeah, you know what, Trump is responsible for this, is because they probably said to him, listen, they're probably sitting in the jury deliberation room, whatever room it's called.

00:37:26.000 And they said, I don't know or care about Donald Trump.

00:37:29.000 I don't want Antifa throwing bricks at my window.

00:37:31.000 Exactly.

00:37:32.000 Guilty.

00:37:32.000 Yep.

00:37:33.000 Well, that's a that's a tampered jury.

00:37:35.000 You need to look.

00:37:36.000 Yeah.

00:37:37.000 How do we expect to have an impartial trial in this situation?

00:37:41.000 Because this is this is the case that that happens when you have a country that's been so bifurcated the way we have, where our access to information has totally changed because of the Internet.

00:37:53.000 Where and and the rise of cable news that you've set up a case now where there is one part so conservatives generally will say, well, you know, I want to hear the other side.

00:38:04.000 I want to call out.

00:38:04.000 We want to we want to keep everyone on the same standard.

00:38:07.000 We want to make sure that you know, everyone's playing by the rules.

00:38:11.000 Where's the left?

00:38:12.000 The left will just sit there and say, I want to destroy the right. 0.89

00:38:15.000 I want to destroy anyone who's related to Donald Trump, who's related to January 6th.

00:38:20.000 You see case after case after case.

00:38:22.000 That's why they're putting Bannon on trial in New York, right?

00:38:24.000 Bannon wasn't even in New York, but they're gonna put him on trial in New York.

00:38:27.000 That's why Bannon, he's got his four month sentence.

00:38:29.000 That might be coming up soon, by the way.

00:38:30.000 That's already happened for Bannon, that he may have to serve four months and it's looking that way.

00:38:36.000 But you also had to, to Brandon's point, there was a case where on that, in that very same, so Steve was, Raising money for this we build the wall Endeavor where it was like this private building the wall thing and one of the guys so one of the guys took a plea deal Steve got pardoned and there was another guy who actually went to trial.

00:38:54.000 This is the federal case not the state case There was another guy who went to trial in New York on this and there was one juror Who sat there the entire time and said you know what you guys are a bunch of liberals you guys are just Repeating whatever the government tells you.

00:39:12.000 And you can even see in the, like Politico has the report, the man repeated anti-government conspiracy theories and through the entire trial and refused to go along with anything the other people said.

00:39:23.000 So somebody, I think his name was Roberto, that someone actually did get in, like a normal person got onto one of the trials.

00:39:31.000 And stood up to these guys.

00:39:32.000 Yeah.

00:39:32.000 And stood up.

00:39:32.000 So was it a hung jury or something?

00:39:34.000 So it was a hung jury.

00:39:35.000 But that being said, not exactly a great legal strategy if you're, if you're hoping for that.

00:39:40.000 But the media also has gotten very involved in the justice system, and I think that I wouldn't be surprised if they're bullying jurors and stuff as well.

00:39:49.000 I mean, throughout my J6 criminal case, I had reporters from CNN contacting my prosecutors, asking them to rethink giving me a plea deal.

00:39:58.000 I mean, literally just inserting themselves into the system.

00:40:01.000 MSNBC had a guy chasing the Kyle Rittenhouse jury.

00:40:05.000 Remember the jury was going back and they lied about it.

00:40:08.000 They lied about that.

00:40:09.000 It was happening.

00:40:10.000 And they, and so MSNBC put out the statement or, and then NBC as well.

00:40:14.000 Cause it was like, he was an NBC stringer basically.

00:40:16.000 And they said, Oh, we don't have anyone doing that.

00:40:18.000 And then they found the produce.

00:40:18.000 And then they found the guy and said, no, here's the producer.

00:40:22.000 This I work for him because he was, you know, he wanted to stay out of jail basically.

00:40:26.000 And a hundred percent that's, that is 100% what they do.

00:40:29.000 Let's jump to this next story.

00:40:30.000 We got this from TimCast.com.

00:40:32.000 The Daily Wire has received about 200 violations from YouTube regarding coverage of transgenderism.

00:40:38.000 Jeremy Boring quote, YouTube only does more damage the longer it keeps its finger on the scales.

00:40:45.000 Candace Owens and Michael Knowles have both been suspended for seven days from Friday.

00:40:50.000 Well, they were suspended completely?

00:40:52.000 Suspended completely.

00:40:53.000 So they can't post?

00:40:53.000 They cannot post videos.

00:40:55.000 I didn't realize that.

00:40:55.000 And well, funny enough, no one's writing about it.

00:40:58.000 Yeah, if you look it up, it'll just say demonetized.

00:41:01.000 But Jeremy Boring, Jeremy says, on Friday, Candace Owens and Michael Knowles were suspended for seven days after receiving their second strike.

00:41:12.000 And Jordan Peterson was given his first strike, three in 90 days, and your account is terminated.

00:41:17.000 I don't think this has anything to do with the trans issue, to be completely honest.

00:41:21.000 I think what we're seeing with Fox News, with Project Veritas, and now The Daily Wire, Anybody who is prominent and vocal and is a threat to the establishment is starting to get hit particularly hard.

00:41:35.000 Kind of like DDoS attacks over at the Postmillennial and Human Events, where if you go and subscribe, you can help us prevent... But in all seriousness, yes.

00:41:42.000 Postmillennial, Bongino Report, Human Events just got hit, as we're preparing to do this show, with a major DDoS attack.

00:41:49.000 It was all coordinated.

00:41:50.000 There's no way.

00:41:52.000 Look, you know, we had on, um, I think it was John Cardillo, and we were talking about Veritas, and I said, I find it very strange that Fox News and Veritas did basically the same thing to O'Keefe and Tucker.

00:42:04.000 Suspend them so they can't work, but don't release them from their contracts so they can't go anywhere else either.

00:42:10.000 That's a very specific strategy to take against prominent individuals in the cultural debate and the culture war.

00:42:16.000 As for the Daily Wire, They're not big Trump guys!

00:42:19.000 You know, many of their personalities are very much for Ron DeSantis, but either way, they're challenging the cultural establishment, the norms, and the machine, and so what they're saying is that YouTube is actively, employees at YouTube are actively going through year-old videos and issuing strikes and takedowns for posts that they had no problem with before.

00:42:38.000 Wait, so this isn't like the Daily Wire, and I'm sorry, I haven't read the story, but this isn't like the Daily Wire launched some new campaign that broke all the rules.

00:42:47.000 It's that the rules have actually shifted and they're going retroactively against old videos that were okay, which by the way, YouTube recently changed the rules regarding elections.

00:42:59.000 So there was a certain topic that we could only talk about here in the third hour, which we could now talk about on the regular show.

00:43:06.000 That's actually not necessarily true.

00:43:08.000 We we I talked with Steve Bannon about the election issue and he outright said he thought the election was stolen.

00:43:14.000 They just had this weird rule that I think only applied to YouTube's rules only apply to their actual targets, and the rules are arbitrary, is the easiest way to put it.

00:43:24.000 I mean, that's what I'm getting at.

00:43:26.000 When The Hill, I think it was The Hill Rising, I believe, with Sager and Crystal Ball, Sager and Jetty and Crystal Ball, they had a clip, I think it was them, I could be wrong, they had a clip of Donald Trump at a rally.

00:43:37.000 Because they don't do it anymore.

00:43:39.000 And then Donald Trump at the rally said the election was stolen, and YouTube took their video down.

00:43:43.000 There were also like news reports where they did the same thing.

00:43:46.000 But then you had David Pakman, who had on Mike Lindell, and David allowed Mike Lindell to say, His entire theory of how the election was stolen.

00:43:57.000 And I asked YouTube, why is it that David Pakman can host Mike Lindell and say, Mike, tell us all, tell us everything.

00:44:05.000 And then he does.

00:44:07.000 But then you take down a clip from a rally that was on the news of Donald Trump saying a thing.

00:44:12.000 It's because the rules were arbitrary, as they are now.

00:44:15.000 YouTube didn't change the rules on transgenderism, they're changing their interpretation of what breaks the rules.

00:44:19.000 That's what they're doing.

00:44:21.000 So if, you know, Matt Walsh or Michael Knowles, and Michael Knowles especially, makes a very simple and academic argument about his views on transgenderism or something like that, they'll say, okay, well, that didn't cross the line.

00:44:35.000 Year later, you know what?

00:44:37.000 Nah, it did.

00:44:38.000 Boom.

00:44:38.000 Because what is hate speech?

00:44:40.000 It's interpretable.

00:44:41.000 There's no clearly defined line that you can or cannot cross.

00:44:44.000 It's just, uh, you're against it, so it's hate speech.

00:44:48.000 Take you down.

00:44:49.000 I think this is a lot to do with the election cycle is here.

00:44:53.000 Don't be surprised if they start coming at us in some way, somehow, whatever that may be.

00:44:56.000 They're already coming after you.

00:44:58.000 And I'm talking about political interests.

00:45:01.000 And we're going to dig into this as much as possible.

00:45:03.000 I'm talking about super PACs, political interests, hackers, probably rogue elements of the intel agencies we've already seen.

00:45:12.000 Foreign states.

00:45:13.000 Foreign states.

00:45:14.000 I mean, if Ukraine's involved in this, obviously they don't want these tapes coming out.

00:45:19.000 Have you not experienced the retroactive... Your episode, Brandon!

00:45:24.000 There was that!

00:45:25.000 That's a bunch of times with WalkAway.

00:45:30.000 I wasn't on that episode, what happened?

00:45:32.000 Don't know!

00:45:33.000 The last time you were here, we did an episode.

00:45:38.000 And one of the clips was removed, and your full episode was removed.

00:45:42.000 I believe the clip came from the full episode.

00:45:44.000 And we got an email from YouTube saying, we know that you didn't intend to break the rules, but you did.

00:45:49.000 So we're removing these videos, but not applying a strike to your channel.

00:45:54.000 And then the video was taken down.

00:45:55.000 Wait, wait, wait.

00:45:57.000 Have you seen what Darren Beatty's been talking about, about his clips from here?

00:46:02.000 So IRL from IRL where and I'd have to go back and look exactly what it was but they he had a clip from IRL from like forever ago talking about Ray apps like I mean easily over 18 months ago where you could go on Twitter and I tried this and you were clicking on it and it wouldn't play.

00:46:21.000 On Twitter.

00:46:22.000 So it was a clip from IRL, on Twitter, and it was like, and I tried it on multiple devices, I tried it on like, you know, on Wi-Fi, off Wi-Fi, it would not, like, it would start, and then it wouldn't, and then it would just go to the spin, and it would lock.

00:46:35.000 I think that BD show was taken down too.

00:46:37.000 Which one?

00:46:38.000 I think that Darren BD episode had been taken down by us.

00:46:40.000 Well, we took it down and put it on Rumble, and it's actually our most viewed episode ever.

00:46:45.000 Wow.

00:46:45.000 Yeah, it's got like eight or nine million views.

00:46:47.000 Crazy.

00:46:48.000 I'll tell you a crazy story.

00:46:50.000 In, I think it was 2017, I could be wrong, I went to Davos during the World Economic Forum.

00:46:56.000 I was in the peripheral events, crypto was a big component, so flew out and I was like, alright, recorded some, I think I was only doing like one video per day at that time, so I like recorded a video in advance, flew to Davos, Three days of videos that I produced there are gone.

00:47:12.000 Oh, wow.

00:47:13.000 No idea how or why, never received a message or a notice.

00:47:16.000 Just on my youtube.com slash TimCast channel, you can go to the date.

00:47:19.000 And there was, I discovered this years later when there was a specific video I made about the case for Bitcoin coming out of Davos and how all of these, you know, worldly elite types were very interested in crypto.

00:47:33.000 And I was like, I want to find that video that I did.

00:47:35.000 I interviewed somebody in a bar, gone.

00:47:39.000 And I was like, where are my videos?

00:47:42.000 They're just gone.

00:47:44.000 This has happened a couple times.

00:47:45.000 Another time was I produced a video on something called the Isdal Woman.

00:47:49.000 You ever hear this story?

00:47:50.000 No.

00:47:51.000 The Isdal Woman in Norway, in Bergen, Norway.

00:47:53.000 It was a woman who was found up in the mountains just outside of the town of Bergen.

00:47:58.000 of the city and she was dead. They said from smoke inhalation they found a bunch of passports or something.

00:48:03.000 The working theory is that she was Mossad and she was tracking down former Nazis and

00:48:08.000 ending their existence, but this time she did not succeed.

00:48:12.000 Don't know for sure exactly if that's true. It's a mystery.

00:48:15.000 Everyone wonders what it was all about.

00:48:16.000 That video's gone.

00:48:18.000 Now that one, I can't tell you why.

00:48:21.000 And you know, I thought it was a cool little mystery ghost story, like 10 minute thing.

00:48:25.000 And one day I went to find it and share with somebody, gone.

00:48:29.000 The Davos thing, I wonder if that one's a little on the nose.

00:48:33.000 Here I am in the peripheral, I didn't go in the event, I had no access to any of that stuff.

00:48:36.000 But outside of the World Economic Forum, a bunch of people show up and put on peripheral parties and events, because they want to basically like suckle the teat of influence outside of there.

00:48:47.000 Yeah, and they're hoping that their peripheral event will get attention.

00:48:50.000 And so I'm there, I put three videos together as I was doing daily videos, and they just got erased.

00:48:55.000 So, I'll just put it this way.

00:48:58.000 YouTube, very much so, secretly takes videos down.

00:49:01.000 There's an individual who is a whistleblower, they called him, for the CIA, which resulted in Trump's impeachment, and I don't even know the rules on saying this guy's name anymore, but you did say his name!

00:49:10.000 I did say his name!

00:49:11.000 Nothing happened!

00:49:12.000 Yeah.

00:49:13.000 Maybe that's why they got mad.

00:49:14.000 But these videos have also been taken down without notice.

00:49:18.000 Carrick Aramela.

00:49:20.000 Carrick.

00:49:20.000 Carrick Aramela.

00:49:21.000 Yes.

00:49:22.000 Good old Carrick.

00:49:23.000 There was a period where even though his name was being reported widely in the press, Rand Paulson, speaking on the Senate floor, unrelated issue, mentioned the guy's name from a report, and YouTube deleted a C-SPAN clip.

00:49:38.000 Fox News clip as well.

00:49:40.000 They were taking this down and they had no justification.

00:49:44.000 There was no rule violation.

00:49:45.000 It is obvious that there are intelligence agency assets interlinked with YouTube the same as Twitter and Facebook and we know it.

00:49:55.000 We know who's really behind all this, Tim.

00:49:58.000 Santa Claus.

00:49:59.000 They.

00:50:00.000 They're doing it.

00:50:01.000 I was watching Justice League.

00:50:02.000 It was them again?

00:50:03.000 It was them.

00:50:04.000 I was watching Justice League, and it's this really funny clip.

00:50:07.000 I started laughing super hard.

00:50:09.000 The show's from 2005, but it's Superman being, you know, Shazam, Captain Marvel quits the team, and then Superman's like, he's right, and then Batman goes, they set you up, Clark.

00:50:19.000 And he goes, what does it matter anyway?

00:50:20.000 They and then he goes, they, and then it plays ominous music and it shows all the like Justice League looking at

00:50:26.000 each other.

00:50:27.000 It's funny because they is a reference to the powerful establishment, the corporate elites, the wealthy elites,

00:50:33.000 but the media for some reason has been desperate to turn it into specifically Jewish people.

00:50:38.000 So it's like when we when we say colloquially they they will try to claim you're talking about is like I'm usually

00:50:47.000 talking about like oil companies and banks.

00:50:51.000 Well, it's contextual as well.

00:50:52.000 Like, for example, you were just talking about Davos.

00:50:55.000 So in this case, you'd obviously be referring to the World Economic Forum having some kind of joined at the hip, behind the scenes relationship with the leaders of YouTube.

00:51:05.000 So it makes sense for you to say they in that sense.

00:51:08.000 Well, no, I don't think World Economic Forum.

00:51:10.000 So much longer to be able to say that.

00:51:11.000 I think intelligence agencies.

00:51:12.000 I think.

00:51:13.000 We'll talk about the Davos clip specifically.

00:51:15.000 I still think that's U.S.

00:51:16.000 intelligence agencies.

00:51:18.000 I will say that I know for a fact the U.S.

00:51:19.000 intelligence agencies have been very, very interested in Bitcoin and continue to be, from even back when I was still surveying to way into the future.

00:51:29.000 And I had interviewed some prominent figures in the political space, and without warning, without a strike, without an email, the videos were taken down.

00:51:38.000 So I wonder if they were like, yo, we don't want that person on camera.

00:51:43.000 They shouldn't have done that.

00:51:44.000 What do we do?

00:51:46.000 Well, the video's been publicly viewed by 50,000 people.

00:51:49.000 If we give a strike, it's gonna make some waves and we don't want that to happen, so just wait a little bit, remove it without saying anything, and it's gone.

00:51:57.000 That's a great- it's like stealth editing.

00:51:59.000 Yep.

00:52:00.000 Going into- and so, with the thousands of videos we've produced, the thousands of videos Daily Wire- I bet Daily Wire doesn't even know the videos that were taken down.

00:52:07.000 Because how often are you going back?

00:52:10.000 You know, or are you looking at your total number of videos?

00:52:12.000 I mean, it's just, you know, you're, you're, you're churning out content constantly.

00:52:15.000 You're not like sitting there looking at, Hey, I'm missing five videos, you know?

00:52:20.000 Yeah.

00:52:20.000 I think the daily wire guy, this thing is like personal, uh, after like, what was a month ago, Matt Walsh got demonetized and then they went, we're officially going to Twitter.

00:52:30.000 I think Matt Walsh show is not officially on Twitter.

00:52:32.000 That is what the home of the Matt Walsh show.

00:52:34.000 So people at Google understand the people at Daily Wire have no loyalty to Google and they're like, all right, these guys are on their way out anyway.

00:52:41.000 I mean, you're seeing, and that is a broader story, right?

00:52:43.000 So you are seeing right now.

00:52:46.000 A broader showdown, because Elon has certainly been making some overtures suggesting that he might get into the online video marketplace, that he might get into this.

00:52:59.000 Periscope, they're talking about bringing that back.

00:53:01.000 He's looking at different ways to monetize Twitter, so if Twitter video, people posting to Twitter could potentially be something.

00:53:08.000 But also, YouTube is facing a ton of competition for Rumble right now, and they're starting to feel the heat.

00:53:14.000 They're absolutely starting to feel the heat.

00:53:16.000 I mean, it's crazy when you look at some of these Rumble videos and they have massive viewership, thousands of live viewers, tens of thousands of views per video, and even the videos we put up get a decent amount of hits in the tens of thousands.

00:53:26.000 That's something we've not seen any rival be able to pull off until now.

00:53:29.000 We've um so we just on on human events so we just took my daily show and we were switched it to a live format in the afternoon now 2 p.m hey check it out and we we noticed immediately like a tenfold increase in our rumble numbers just overnight wow the people love it they say like they it's it's a little bit more in the mix you know it's live so people like that format but suddenly all of a sudden i think rumble it's yeah you know and look like you know i mean i love the guys at rumble but i'm sure that they are Giving more priority to live video because they realize that's a capability they have that they need to have if they want to compete against YouTube, Twitch, etc.

00:54:06.000 Everything that's out there.

00:54:07.000 Yeah, I think if you make internet videos that you should probably be backing them up on across multiple platforms.

00:54:13.000 I used to think like All my stuff's on YouTube.

00:54:16.000 It's safe now in 10,000 years.

00:54:17.000 It used to be that way, right?

00:54:19.000 Yeah.

00:54:20.000 Unfortunately... Well, especially now they're going back and taking, you know, old content down for new rules, you know, as they become more insane.

00:54:29.000 Things that you made years ago may be violating things that they've now decided you're not allowed to say.

00:54:33.000 Yep.

00:54:33.000 And they'll retroactively give you a strike and delete your channel.

00:54:36.000 It's insane.

00:54:37.000 And guess what?

00:54:38.000 Elon Musk can't just swing in and buy every platform out there.

00:54:41.000 I mean, I wish, but no, it's not going to happen.

00:54:43.000 The strike thing feels very weird that they struck the channel for something that happened a while ago.

00:54:49.000 Yeah, well, the strikes, we don't, I don't know where the strikes came from for Daily Wire, but so 200 violations, and I think, let me pull up the thread from Jeremy, what did he say over the last few months?

00:55:00.000 What'll happen is as a social media admin, if you see an account that's questionable and you're like, I think this violates terms, but it's not overt.

00:55:08.000 So I'm not going to block this thing.

00:55:10.000 Cause you err on the side of like, let it up, let it stay up.

00:55:13.000 And then it, but it builds.

00:55:14.000 And then you'll start to have this like inventory of like disputable content from this one creator.

00:55:19.000 And they'll have like seven things that they've done where you're like, these are seven questionable things.

00:55:23.000 And then over and over.

00:55:23.000 And then all of a sudden they'll do one that crosses the line.

00:55:26.000 You're like, all right, all of them crossed the line now.

00:55:28.000 Not really an ethical way to do it, but that is what happens.

00:55:31.000 It does seem like a good portion of them are demonetization violations.

00:55:37.000 And so, we've gotten our share of those too.

00:55:40.000 I don't think I've gotten any hate speech demonetizations.

00:55:47.000 It's usually like graphic.

00:55:49.000 It's like, oh we demonetized it because it's adult content or something.

00:55:51.000 It's like showing violence or conflict or adult themes.

00:55:56.000 But not for hateful derogatory content like they're going after the Daily Wire.

00:56:01.000 We're pretty religious about not doing that on this show.

00:56:04.000 I mean, we will talk with our guests before we go live about what not to say, what violates YouTube's terms so everyone's up to speed.

00:56:10.000 And we got like a 99% accuracy, right?

00:56:13.000 That's absolutely not true, Ian.

00:56:15.000 On this show?

00:56:17.000 98% maybe?

00:56:19.000 We may be mentioned to like 1 out of 15 guests what YouTube's rules are.

00:56:24.000 I want to think it's more than that, like six out of ten.

00:56:27.000 And that's why we end up having to take episodes down because people think that they, they think this show is like sitting in your friend's living room having a beer as opposed to primetime cable TV talk or something like that.

00:56:39.000 So I usually tell people, if it does, so we used to have a card that said like, this is what YouTube's rules are.

00:56:45.000 We don't have rules YouTube does.

00:56:47.000 If you want to say these things and the show gets taken down, understand that's what will happen.

00:56:52.000 And so I try to keep a balance to it where I'm like, I'll tell people, look man, you can say whatever you want.

00:56:58.000 If you've come all the way out here to come on this show and then you want to say things you know will break the rules, we'll roll our eyes and then the episode gets taken down.

00:57:07.000 So if you don't care about people seeing the episode, like, totally get it.

00:57:11.000 But we stopped showing people YouTube's rules because they would then intentionally Break them, or just only talk about that?

00:57:20.000 And we were like, dude, we showed you the YouTube policies, not so that you could sit here and just only talk about that, or to intentionally try and break the rules.

00:57:29.000 So then we're like, okay, just like, dude, don't make allusions to violence, all right?

00:57:33.000 And then YouTube had a rule about the election.

00:57:35.000 Whatever.

00:57:36.000 In fact, most of those rules, they're not actually enforceable as long as it's a debate and not overt.

00:57:43.000 But the reason I push back, Ian, because it's actually very, very frustrating that we don't tell everybody when they come on what YouTube's rules are, and then we end up having to take episodes down, lest we get suspended for a week.

00:57:55.000 Yeah, sometimes you'll go 3 hours, or 2 hours, I guess we do, 2 hours, and an hour and 59 minutes of it is totally cool, but 30 seconds go by and something gets said and you're like, well...

00:58:05.000 That's... we were batting 99.98%, but that's one moment.

00:58:09.000 You can't trim episodes.

00:58:10.000 You can't trim things out.

00:58:12.000 I don't know why they took your episode down that we did, Brandon.

00:58:14.000 No idea.

00:58:15.000 They did not tell me.

00:58:16.000 We talked about trans stuff a lot that night.

00:58:19.000 Yeah, but we're not like...

00:58:22.000 You know, the one thing I tell people is try to keep it academic.

00:58:25.000 You know what I mean?

00:58:26.000 Make your criticisms fierce and passionate, but, you know, make them academic and not just generally trying to insult somebody.

00:58:32.000 And so we're usually fine about it, and I have no idea what we could have done.

00:58:36.000 Sorry to interrupt.

00:58:37.000 What is their policy about misgendering?

00:58:40.000 I don't think there is one.

00:58:41.000 You don't?

00:58:42.000 Because I remember we talked a lot about Dylan Mulvaney in that episode and you were, you know, staunchly arguing that he's a man and we were kind of like having that discussion.

00:58:42.000 No.

00:58:51.000 And my position has been on all these episodes, we'll see if they retroactively enforce this, is that Dylan is a character like Borat intentionally insulting women and trans people.

00:59:00.000 And now Dylan has that statement saying I want to move beyond this and be a comedian.

00:59:00.000 Yeah.

00:59:04.000 Yeah.

00:59:05.000 And a lesbian. 0.65

00:59:07.000 That's part of his comedy.

00:59:08.000 And actually that clip was him saying that he's attracted to trans women, not biological females.

00:59:14.000 Oh, sorry.

00:59:15.000 But the clip was cut off.

00:59:17.000 What Mulvaney was arguing To his dad was that he's attracted to women and his dad was

00:59:22.000 like, oh wow, and he was like no Trans women cuz trans women are women. That's what he was

00:59:26.000 saying Not that he likes females, but my position has always been

00:59:30.000 that Mulvaney is in I believe it's a character intending to mock trans people

00:59:35.000 like I guess fine like some some He's playing camp.

00:59:39.000 That's how he described it.

00:59:40.000 filing following around Dill Mulvaney and then found that you know, like a normal life

00:59:45.000 like he doesn't dress like that or act like that at all.

00:59:48.000 But I don't I don't necessarily care to get all that.

00:59:50.000 I will just say that I'm saying it goes to your point.

00:59:52.000 He's playing camp.

00:59:53.000 That's how he described it.

00:59:54.000 Like he's campy, you know?

00:59:56.000 Yeah.

00:59:57.000 And you look at like Borat as Bruno.

00:59:58.000 Yeah. 0.87

00:59:58.000 Was like a fake gay guy and being over-the-top and insulting and, you know, Ron Paul got really mad about it. 0.87

01:00:04.000 That's what I see with Mulvaney.

01:00:06.000 But, uh, so your episode gets taken down and we have no idea why.

01:00:09.000 They won't tell us.

01:00:10.000 I bet that's part of it because that was right when the Bud Light boycott was kicking off hard and there's a lot of people talking about Dylan and a lot of videos got pulled over the course of like a week period or something.

01:00:19.000 Yeah.

01:00:19.000 Including something I think by Michael Knowles.

01:00:21.000 There's something interesting, too, when it comes to, like, Fox News and other cable networks.

01:00:25.000 I have never been told one time I can't say a thing.

01:00:29.000 Like, they've never even said, hey, remember, no swearing.

01:00:30.000 I've never even been told that.

01:00:32.000 You know, you go on, I don't know if you've ever, you've done TV hits and stuff, I'd imagine, both you guys.

01:00:37.000 A lot, yeah.

01:00:37.000 Have they ever told you, like, okay, now don't forget when you're on, this is FCC Airwaves, so you can't say these things?

01:00:42.000 No.

01:00:42.000 Yeah, I've never had that happen.

01:00:43.000 No, and Fox Nation, you can swear, but the cable network, you can't.

01:00:47.000 Yeah.

01:00:49.000 I've never had someone sit me down and say anything like that.

01:00:52.000 I mean, typically, you know, you'll be told, like, This is what we're going to discuss in the hit.

01:00:58.000 We want to bring you on about, um, uh, like, you know, like when I put my Antifa book out there.

01:01:04.000 So, you know, I did a lot of TV hits for that.

01:01:06.000 So you're going to talk about Antifa.

01:01:07.000 You're going to talk about this.

01:01:08.000 You're going to talk about this is the flow.

01:01:09.000 It's this long.

01:01:10.000 I, it's never anything about that.

01:01:14.000 They're never like, don't say the F word tonight.

01:01:17.000 No.

01:01:17.000 Yeah, we always tell people, like, we try not to swear.

01:01:20.000 If you do, no one's gonna cry about it, but there might be kids listening, and they go, oh, okay.

01:01:23.000 I guess, realistically, the onus is on you to understand FCC regulations if you're gonna go do a show, an FCC-guided show.

01:01:30.000 You really are supposed to know, otherwise you're not gonna get welcomed back. 0.53

01:01:32.000 I was on Glenn Beck's radio show, and I said, Dick. 0.96

01:01:36.000 I said I was being a dick, and then he was like, just a reminder, we're on FCC Airwaves, but, you know, anyway. 0.99

01:01:40.000 And I'm like, can you not say dick? 1.00

01:01:43.000 Like, I didn't say, like, male genitals. 1.00

01:01:45.000 I said, like, I was being a dick. 0.99

01:01:48.000 The word literally in that context means a rude person, you know? 0.63

01:01:51.000 And a few people have crossed the line on air on Fox, and that's been awkward, and those people have not been asked back.

01:01:57.000 There have been a few moments like that.

01:01:59.000 Didn't they?

01:01:59.000 That have happened.

01:02:00.000 Who was, uh... Ana Paulina Luna.

01:02:02.000 No, Matt Walsh.

01:02:03.000 Or was it Matt Walsh?

01:02:05.000 Who was like, they stopped booking him after he said something on the air?

01:02:08.000 Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, he called, he said that Greta Thunberg was developmentally disabled. 0.99

01:02:13.000 Is that what happened?

01:02:14.000 But that's true.

01:02:16.000 I mean, like, she's autistic or something? 0.89

01:02:18.000 And I think he referenced this, some factual statement, and they were like, don't say that about her!

01:02:24.000 He's like, well, I still remember a couple of years ago when Newt Gingrich was on and he was talking about the DAs and this, again, this was like 2020 and he's mentioned, and oh, by the way, you have a lot of these left-wing DAs in big cities that were funded by George Soros and the host cuts him off.

01:02:43.000 It's like, whoa, whoa, we don't want to go there.

01:02:45.000 We don't want to, we didn't bring that up.

01:02:46.000 And he's like, what do you mean?

01:02:49.000 He's the one who's funding them.

01:02:50.000 Like I didn't, I didn't say it was, uh, I can't remember the host on top of my head, but, but it was, um, yeah, he gets cut off.

01:02:57.000 The interview gets stopped.

01:02:59.000 He gets like told off on air and, and what's, what's wild though.

01:03:05.000 And you were talking about how the rules change from day to day.

01:03:07.000 Now everybody talks about that.

01:03:09.000 It's totally fine.

01:03:11.000 People push it.

01:03:11.000 Rhonda Sanders talks about it and he's like a, he talks about Rhonda Sanders talks about it.

01:03:15.000 Harris Faulkner constantly.

01:03:17.000 Okay.

01:03:17.000 And, And he's like, you know, a major candidate, right?

01:03:21.000 Not like the leading candidate, but a major candidate.

01:03:24.000 And I've never heard anyone push back on DeSantis to call him anti-Semitic for bringing up George Soros, because I think we've breached a point where people realize that, you know, the now former, you know, retired George Soros, it's just so obvious and it's so heavily reported that you just can't Talk about the issue without referring to Soros DA.

01:03:47.000 It's just true.

01:03:48.000 It's true.

01:03:49.000 Exactly.

01:03:49.000 So I think it's a great example of showing that if you keep pushing and you have the truth on your side, right?

01:03:56.000 That's the other part of it.

01:03:56.000 You can't just keep pushing, you know, for fun.

01:03:59.000 Remember that you're going to win.

01:04:01.000 Remember when a bunch of people were claiming that there was like an elite cabal Who was trafficking minors.

01:04:08.000 You know, powerful political and corporate elites. 0.97

01:04:11.000 And the media was like, you are crazy! 1.00

01:04:14.000 You people are nuts! 1.00

01:04:16.000 And then Epstein got arrested for it. 1.00

01:04:18.000 And then Maxwell is in prison for it.

01:04:21.000 And it was true. 0.94

01:04:22.000 And Instagram had a massive network that was rolled up, which by the way is amazing to me that we have this news that comes out.

01:04:29.000 Instagram has this huge pedophile network that it's totally available.

01:04:35.000 It's promoted by the algorithm.

01:04:36.000 You've got the Stanford Internet Research Observatory.

01:04:40.000 You've got the University of Massachusetts of Amherst.

01:04:44.000 Have you seen this thing?

01:04:46.000 It's in the Wall Street Journal.

01:04:48.000 They came out and they came up with Basically these like dummy accounts like a brand new account for Instagram and they would make the account look like in some instances they'd make it look like just a general account and sometimes they'd make the account look like it that the account itself was of a minor and then they would go and interact with accounts that were offering and they use lots of different euphemisms and code words for

01:05:14.000 Pedophilic activity, child sex, child sex trafficking, child trading.

01:05:19.000 In some cases, menus of things that you could order specifically from these accounts.

01:05:25.000 And then the next time they went into Instagram, and you went into the search function, the algorithm was feeding it to them.

01:05:31.000 Yep.

01:05:31.000 Wow.

01:05:32.000 Recommending it.

01:05:32.000 Hashtags.

01:05:33.000 Recommending it back to them.

01:05:34.000 Hashtags, etc.

01:05:35.000 But what's wild to me, Wall Street Journal drops that story, and it's just like, Everybody kind of shrugs their shoulders, goes on to the next thing.

01:05:42.000 There's massive pedophile networks operating in the open, in the clear, on Instagram.

01:05:48.000 They're using all the code words, some quite infamous, and nobody has anything about it.

01:05:54.000 We don't even talk about it.

01:05:55.000 But the corporate narrative is Donald Trump should be arrested.

01:05:58.000 Hillary Clinton did nothing wrong. 0.94

01:05:59.000 Because it came out on the same day that the news dropped about Trump's indictment.

01:06:02.000 Let's jump to this next story from TimCast.com.

01:06:05.000 Fox News sends Tucker Carlson cease and desist letter over Twitter show.

01:06:09.000 Oh boy, I love this.

01:06:10.000 Totally insane.

01:06:11.000 They say Carlson was abruptly pulled off the air by Fox News in April.

01:06:13.000 This we know.

01:06:14.000 Axios obtained a copy of the cease and desist letter.

01:06:17.000 Which they report said, not for publication.

01:06:20.000 Quote, Fox is continuing to pay Carlson and maintains that his contract keeps his content exclusive to Fox through December 31st, 2024.

01:06:27.000 Very, very interesting timing.

01:06:29.000 The report exclaimed, Carlson is making a First Amendment argument for posting on Twitter and asserts that Fox has committed material breaches of his contract.

01:06:37.000 Yo, they are trying to silence Tucker until the election is over.

01:06:41.000 They want him in golden handcuffs.

01:06:43.000 And they used to do this.

01:06:44.000 Many networks have done this.

01:06:46.000 In fact, I think it was Cenk Uygur who talked about it.

01:06:48.000 When he was at MSNBC, they basically give you no airtime, but they're paying you so you're in golden handcuffs.

01:06:54.000 They take care of you and you can't work.

01:06:56.000 That's what they were trying to do with Tucker.

01:06:57.000 Hey, look, we're not running your show anymore, but we're going to keep paying you.

01:07:01.000 And he's like, no, I want to speak out.

01:07:03.000 I think the machine, the corporate elites, the neolibs, the neocons, no.

01:07:09.000 It was, uh, what year was it?

01:07:11.000 Was it 2018?

01:07:12.000 When Alex Jones and a bunch of right-wing personalities were suspended across all these different platforms?

01:07:17.000 Yeah, 18.

01:07:18.000 18.

01:07:18.000 It was like a big purge.

01:07:20.000 Because they were like, hey, wait a minute.

01:07:22.000 These are the people that helped Donald Trump get elected.

01:07:24.000 They're going to be doing the exact same thing, and it's begun.

01:07:27.000 Not just the Daily Wire, but also Tucker Carlson.

01:07:31.000 The idea that you would take Tucker, who is someone that, think of it, right?

01:07:35.000 Up until just a few weeks ago, one month ago, the number one name in America in terms of primetime news, after TeamCast IRL, at least on cable news, the number one guy.

01:07:47.000 The number one guy.

01:07:50.000 And suddenly he's summarily fired, but not only is he fired and in, and I'm just going to say it in a very disrespectful way, the way they treated Tucker, um, his very last appearance, he says, we'll see you on Monday.

01:08:06.000 So he didn't, they didn't, they didn't even give him the opportunity to do a sort of sign off show or even come out over the weekend and say, Hey, this thing happened, et cetera, et cetera.

01:08:15.000 No.

01:08:15.000 And if it was part of the Dominion lawsuit, that means they knew in advance they were planning on taking Tucker off the air and did not let him know at all.

01:08:22.000 Right.

01:08:23.000 Yeah, I guess they didn't fire him.

01:08:25.000 I'm still trying to get the liturgy.

01:08:26.000 They did not.

01:08:27.000 They took his show off the air, but he's still under contract.

01:08:29.000 So they're basically saying, you can't work anywhere, but don't worry, we'll pay you.

01:08:32.000 Which is the same thing they did to James.

01:08:34.000 The same thing they did to James O'Keefe.

01:08:36.000 Yeah, I wonder if Tucker's show is part of his contract.

01:08:39.000 Like, we're gonna pay you for this show, we'll give you this amount of money.

01:08:42.000 So if the show is removed from the contract, essentially the contract becomes null and void.

01:08:46.000 Probably kind of what Tucker's thinking.

01:08:47.000 Legally, I don't know.

01:08:49.000 I feel like if someone's willing to take a bunch of money for a long-term contract, That's the price you pay when they sideline you.

01:08:56.000 You're stuck.

01:08:56.000 You lost your First Amendment.

01:08:58.000 You can speak out, but there's consequences in the form of getting sued by the person you signed the devil's contract with.

01:09:05.000 So, I don't know.

01:09:07.000 The logical part of my brain is like, Tucker, you're stuck.

01:09:09.000 Tucker, you're stuck!

01:09:09.000 Nah, he's not.

01:09:11.000 The idea that he can't post videos to Twitter is absurd.

01:09:14.000 Well, that's what I was going to ask.

01:09:15.000 The cease and desist is just that he's speaking at all?

01:09:18.000 Right.

01:09:18.000 Is that the idea?

01:09:19.000 You can't.

01:09:20.000 Yeah, that's not a thing.

01:09:21.000 So they're going to say, you know, and I'll play the devil's advocate, you have to be able to give both sides of an argument.

01:09:27.000 So I disagree, but here's what they'll say.

01:09:29.000 They'll argue that even though he's not broadcasting on cable news, that he is essentially continuing his show and thereby competing with what previously would have been his time slot.

01:09:44.000 So So if he changed the format, you think it would work?

01:09:46.000 the Tucker Carlson show or anything that's similar to the Tucker Carlson show while you were still on contract with

01:09:53.000 us.

01:09:53.000 So if he changed the format you think it would work like if he had two guests and like a different angle?

01:09:58.000 I don't know. I don't think it's necessarily the format. It's the fact that he's making this type of content at all.

01:10:04.000 Yeah.

01:10:04.000 So if he set up like, you know, like Tim, like your daily show, like if he was doing

01:10:09.000 like those types of clips, which is kind of similar to what he's doing anyway, they would

01:10:14.000 still say that he's in breach.

01:10:15.000 That's wild, man.

01:10:16.000 Because it's informational content.

01:10:17.000 Making a 10 second internet video, like this is, these are contracts that were created

01:10:21.000 before social media existed.

01:10:24.000 They don't have any place in the modern market where you can make a tweet, make a five-second, 30-minute video when you're sitting on the beach.

01:10:31.000 I don't understand.

01:10:32.000 But he did take the money and sign the contract.

01:10:33.000 So then I guess the question would be, what if he was live streaming it just directly from his phone to Twitter?

01:10:40.000 Is that the same thing where it's, hey, I'm Tucker Carlson and I'm talking about Trump's indictment.

01:10:45.000 Boy, that was terrible and our country's gonna have a civil war and you know, etc.

01:10:50.000 Would that be necessarily a violation because it's not produced content?

01:10:54.000 But none of it is.

01:10:55.000 I mean, they'll argue whatever he does is.

01:10:57.000 But he's not going to have to deal with this.

01:10:59.000 They're not going to court.

01:11:00.000 I'm giving the argument from how they would how they're gonna argue it in court

01:11:05.000 They would argue that him filming live streaming. It is the same thing as a show at night live

01:11:09.000 I think they would show right think they would as well, but he's not gonna have to deal with this

01:11:13.000 They're not going to court. They're not gonna sue him he cuz Tucker could just be like oh you're suing me

01:11:18.000 Okay, I guess I agree with your lawsuit. Let's go to discovery. I won't challenge it for dismissal

01:11:23.000 We'll straight to discovery and Fox and ago No, wait, don't cuz I know that all the Dominion stuff

01:11:26.000 comes out and they don't want that to happen And he said already that

01:11:31.000 There have been board members of Fox who, by the way, I'm sure are going to come up for deposition if this goes to any type of lawsuit, that he's going to say, all right, you, you, you, who else was in the room?

01:11:44.000 Who else was in the room?

01:11:45.000 Okay, you, you, you, and you, we're all going to sit down and we're all going to find out exactly what went down when you decided to summarily pull the plug on the Tucker Carlson show.

01:11:54.000 Is Fox News the Fox Corporation?

01:11:57.000 Right, so they actually divested from the larger Fox that Disney bought.

01:12:03.000 Is it Fox Corp then?

01:12:06.000 Yeah, I think Fox Corp or Fox News Corp.

01:12:09.000 I have to wonder then, if the stock price drops in response to the firing of Tucker Carlson, If the board can then be sued for a breach of fiduciary duty.

01:12:21.000 Class action.

01:12:22.000 Does he not have the option, though, to just get out of his contract and not be paid?

01:12:25.000 I thought he... I had read somewhere that he had the option to cancel his contract.

01:12:30.000 I don't think so.

01:12:31.000 And based on my experience having similar contracts from these networks, you can't.

01:12:35.000 You have to request.

01:12:36.000 There has to be like a mutual break.

01:12:39.000 The purpose of the contract is so you can't leave.

01:12:41.000 Otherwise, there's no reason for them to have a contract with you, right?

01:12:44.000 They say, we want you to be only with us for this amount of time.

01:12:47.000 You say yes, and they say, we'll pay you X amount of dollars.

01:12:49.000 If they break the contract, they have to pay him out for the full terms, and then he's free to go.

01:12:54.000 So he's making that argument that they've breached the contract, and I say, it's kind of obvious they did.

01:12:58.000 Which is what happened to Megyn Kelly at NBC. 1.00

01:13:00.000 Yeah.

01:13:01.000 And they let her go?

01:13:02.000 No, they fired her, but then she went in and got the full remainder of her contract. 1.00

01:13:06.000 She got paid.

01:13:07.000 And she got loose to go do her own thing right away, immediately.

01:13:10.000 But that's because she was fired over the blackface thing. 1.00

01:13:14.000 She said, I don't understand why it's offensive.

01:13:16.000 People dress up on Halloween all the time.

01:13:17.000 And it's like, she didn't even say anything offensive.

01:13:19.000 She was just like, I don't get it.

01:13:21.000 Can someone explain to me?

01:13:22.000 Right.

01:13:22.000 And they're like, you're fired.

01:13:24.000 Honestly, like that's like morning show banter kind of stuff that you would do, you know, maybe she's a very smart individual.

01:13:30.000 I'm sure she knows why people don't like it.

01:13:31.000 Look, she made it like a bandit. 1.00

01:13:33.000 It was a big mistake for her to try and do one of these hokey morning shows. 0.90

01:13:35.000 Her podcast now is substantially better and successful.

01:13:39.000 I've always said, um, you know, and, and, and people know Megyn Kelly and I have had our differences, but, uh, I've, I mean, Kelly file was fantastic when she was just the, you know, the hard nose, legal, legal slicing and dicing these cases.

01:13:52.000 And I think that's where her podcast has gotten to at this point.

01:13:56.000 And it's substantially better. 0.99

01:13:57.000 And let's not forget, she's the one who asked Trump that fateful question about calling women fat pigs. 0.99

01:14:01.000 That's right. 0.99

01:14:02.000 And then we got that magical moment.

01:14:03.000 And basically won him the election.

01:14:04.000 I gotta say, I don't know Megan personally.

01:14:05.000 That one thing.

01:14:06.000 Yeah.

01:14:07.000 I felt like she had a great kind of evolution, similar to Tucker Carlson, because I remember her being a sort of neo-con in like 2007.

01:14:13.000 If I remember correctly, I remember not liking her at all, being like, she's just a war hawk. 1.00

01:14:17.000 She's just parroting the mainstream media narrative. 0.85

01:14:19.000 It's so annoying. 0.93

01:14:20.000 And then all of a sudden, like 2013-14, She was like not hip to the crap, and I started to see her wake up and kind of like separate herself from the pack and think critically. 0.63

01:14:29.000 And I haven't really followed her work a lot, but I really appreciate that evolution.

01:14:34.000 Her podcast is great.

01:14:35.000 It's very good.

01:14:36.000 I think this is just the beginning.

01:14:38.000 We are going to see a wave of censorship.

01:14:40.000 We're going to see insane smears, lies, cheating, stealing, you name it.

01:14:46.000 My favorite is when they did that Stanford study on like people spreading election disinformation or misinformation or whatever.

01:14:52.000 And they put me on there.

01:14:54.000 And then you have like, I'm not gonna say these people's names, but there's one woman who claims that I pushed the big lie about Trump's election narrative, which literally I've never done and was heavily criticized for doing it.

01:15:04.000 But they've run ads to generate donations claiming that I I'm as ready as I can be, man.

01:15:11.000 Deepfakes.

01:15:11.000 I'm never really ready for the deepfake until I see it and then I'm like, is this happening?

01:15:14.000 I said he lost because they were ballot harvesting and because people were fed up, but they'll lie.

01:15:20.000 Doesn't matter if it makes them money, if it wins them elections, they'll say whatever.

01:15:23.000 So I hope y'all are ready.

01:15:25.000 I'm as ready as I can be, man.

01:15:27.000 Deep fakes, I'm never really ready for the deep fake until I see it and then I'm like, is this happening?

01:15:32.000 We've had the first political campaign official deep fake ad.

01:15:38.000 And DeSantis of all people.

01:15:40.000 Earlier this week.

01:15:41.000 But that being said, this is why, If you remember a couple of months ago, I was pushing deep

01:15:46.000 fakes hard.

01:15:47.000 I was like throwing them up once a week, right?

01:15:51.000 And I didn't know it'd be DeSantis but I knew that there would be campaigns that start slipping them in that just very sneak sneakily and I couched it.

01:16:00.000 I always couched it.

01:16:01.000 these deep fakes in addition to actual content.

01:16:06.000 But you posted stuff like, here's what would happen or something like that.

01:16:10.000 Like here's- I couched it. I always couched it.

01:16:12.000 And they, uh, I think it was the RNC did an ad of what the future might look-

01:16:16.000 what the future will be under Biden.

01:16:18.000 Well, this goes back to LBJ.

01:16:20.000 It shows, uh, deep fake images, AI-generated images of Biden in situations that are clearly

01:16:26.000 not real and are explained as fiction as the premise of the video.

01:16:29.000 Right.

01:16:30.000 The DeSantis campaign put real-life Trump in big block letters and then showed three fake photos of Trump hugging and kissing Dr. Fauci.

01:16:38.000 But they were spliced in, in, so like...

01:16:42.000 You know, you'd call it like a six pack, right?

01:16:44.000 So there were three real pictures of Trump and Fauci spliced in with three fake pictures and I saw...

01:16:52.000 I saw the DeSantis campaign saying, oh, well, Trump posts memes all the time.

01:16:55.000 Trump posts stuff.

01:16:57.000 No, they called it whatever.

01:16:58.000 They called it deepfakes too.

01:16:59.000 And then someone shared Ron riding a rhinoceros.

01:17:02.000 And I'm like, I'm sorry you believe that was real.

01:17:04.000 Which actually was a Photoshop.

01:17:06.000 It was even signed.

01:17:07.000 It obviously wasn't deepfake.

01:17:08.000 But the point is, is that no one was claiming it was real and it wasn't slipped in, you know, mixed in real and fake images together.

01:17:17.000 And tagged as real.

01:17:18.000 And tagged as real, right.

01:17:20.000 Dude, I'm sorry, I don't care.

01:17:22.000 People are tweeting at me, and they're commenting, and they're being like, you don't care about when Trump did the AI deepfake of this Twitter space.

01:17:29.000 And I was like, oh, I'm sorry, you thought the devil and Hitler, actually.

01:17:31.000 You thought the devil, and the Hitler, and the Hitler, and George Soros were all on a Twitter space.

01:17:37.000 Yeah, and Cheney, Dick Cheney.

01:17:40.000 I'm sorry you believed that was real.

01:17:41.000 Like, dude, I don't care. 1.00

01:17:43.000 You're not going to try to, it's the stupidest thing. 0.99

01:17:46.000 Well, how come you're not criticizing Donald Trump when he does it? 1.00

01:17:49.000 Shut your mouth. 1.00

01:17:51.000 Criticizing Donald Trump when he posts stupid memes that no one th- Oh, Ron riding a rhinoceros. 1.00

01:17:55.000 Yo, a political campaign tagged real-life Trump and put deep fake images to smear a political rival. 1.00

01:18:01.000 There is nothing you are going to say to me that's going to make me think otherwise on my opinion.

01:18:06.000 DeSantis is- He needs to come out and disavow 100%.

01:18:11.000 I would even go as far as saying he should probably fire whoever's behind that outright, and I don't want any excuses or manip- or, oh, here's the mailroom guy.

01:18:18.000 No, I want to know who was actually the person who made the video.

01:18:20.000 I want to know who was behind the post of that.

01:18:22.000 They should be fired.

01:18:23.000 There is nothing, right, outside of that, that would get me to support Ron DeSantis in any capacity, even if he becomes the GOP nominee.

01:18:30.000 I don't care.

01:18:31.000 I think that, so is, and just to tease it out, so are you saying that the intent matters here, right?

01:18:38.000 Because you think they were actually intending to, you know, trick the audience into thinking that those were real images.

01:18:46.000 They wrote real life Trump in big block letters and put it over fake images.

01:18:51.000 Sure, because those images, so if you try and do a Google reverse on them, nothing else comes up.

01:18:56.000 So the argument that they accidentally stumbled upon them, no.

01:18:56.000 Of course.

01:18:59.000 They put Fake images of Trump hugging and kissing Fauci because, based on what I see and what I believe, they were intending to manipulate people into thinking Trump actually hugged and kissed Fauci.

01:19:12.000 And you know what?

01:19:13.000 I had just said that day, before I discovered, because the video was a few days older than when I made a video about it, that, um...

01:19:21.000 I had stated Fauci is Trump's biggest weakness and DeSantis absolutely could go after that because Trump repeatedly said like, oh, I couldn't fire him or something like that.

01:19:29.000 But then they decide to cross the line.

01:19:32.000 They were the first to decide we will use AI generated images.

01:19:37.000 That the average person probably won't notice, but will see Trump hugging and kissing Fauci.

01:19:43.000 Yeah.

01:19:44.000 If Ron supports that and does not take action against the person who does that, I do not trust Ron DeSantis.

01:19:44.000 Sorry, dude.

01:19:49.000 So what if they had just taken, let's say, one picture?

01:19:52.000 Because, to your point, they've made it a very strong point.

01:19:54.000 They say, why didn't Trump sideline this guy?

01:19:56.000 Why did he do what he did?

01:19:58.000 And people have gone back and even CNN has looked and said, well, he did criticize.

01:20:02.000 Whatever.

01:20:03.000 They're using it as an attack angle, an attack vector on Trump.

01:20:06.000 Uh, they're using it to attack him from the right because they're in a primary.

01:20:09.000 They're trying to get some, uh, increase in the polls.

01:20:12.000 Everybody gets why they're doing it.

01:20:13.000 They deserve to lose.

01:20:14.000 And so here's my point though.

01:20:17.000 What if they had just posted one of the images by itself without the rest of that advertisement or those texts?

01:20:24.000 Would you be okay with that?

01:20:25.000 If they posted a picture on Twitter of just the deepfake?

01:20:28.000 Yeah.

01:20:29.000 If they said something like, this is how we see it, I'd roll my eyes and be like, guys, you're getting- you're on the line, man.

01:20:36.000 But to take three- If they had caveated it.

01:20:38.000 If they had caveated it in some way, it's clear that you've got people who are coming up to the line and then, like, trying to see if they can get past it.

01:20:46.000 Posting a deepfake as a gag Totally fine.

01:20:50.000 So in the context of being like, Trump is buddy-buddy with Fauci, and this is how we see it, I'd be like, that's kinda dirty.

01:20:58.000 But I wouldn't be, I'd probably forget about it right away.

01:21:01.000 To produce an ad, where you write real-life Trump, and then show it very briefly, very quickly, along with real images, the intent is palpable, it's visible.

01:21:14.000 If they just posted a single image, you could be like, oh look, that text is fake.

01:21:17.000 The White House emblem says Mehehep.

01:21:19.000 It's not a real... Mehehep Wems, it said. 0.94

01:21:21.000 Those aren't words, it's gibberish.

01:21:22.000 You could see that and be like... Right, because for some reason, AI cannot get text right.

01:21:27.000 Well, because text is code.

01:21:29.000 It's like writing meaning into images.

01:21:32.000 It can get images.

01:21:32.000 Sure, if you imagine that something like the alphabet in the English language could be...

01:21:36.000 They should work on that.

01:21:37.000 Pretty easily programmed in.

01:21:38.000 By putting three fake along with three real, the average person who sees these smaller images with real-life Trump written over it is not going to have, and it's a video, the time to deeply analyze each photo as if they were just to tweet out one fake photo.

01:21:55.000 People would notice it was a deepfake right away.

01:21:57.000 I'd still say it's fairly dirty, but I would not be as upset.

01:22:01.000 The fact that they tagged it real life, put it next to real images in an attempt to trick people into thinking Trump actually did these things is the dirtiest politics. 0.89

01:22:11.000 The dirtiest.

01:22:12.000 Joe Biden launched his presidential campaign with the very fine people hoax.

01:22:17.000 I will not stand for that, nor will I stand for the DeSantis campaign doing similar things.

01:22:22.000 I think the Verifying People hoax was worse, because he made this big video explaining the lie, and this was a brief bit of fake news they produced, but the idea that someone's going to come to me and be like, You're a trumper because Donald Trump posted a meme and that's why DeSantis is allowed to do it.

01:22:40.000 Literally just don't care. 0.98

01:22:40.000 Shut up, don't care. 0.98

01:22:42.000 If Ron DeSantis, if he does not deal with it, if he does not address it, if he does not take action against it, and he becomes a GOP nominee, I will not vote for him. 0.98

01:22:52.000 Don't care.

01:22:53.000 It was posted by the DeSantis War Room Twitter page.

01:22:57.000 And I don't know how official... That's Bashaw's thing?

01:23:00.000 That's a rapid response.

01:23:02.000 Well, we don't know who made it.

01:23:04.000 We don't know who made the video, but I don't think it's Bashaw.

01:23:07.000 Yeah, I mean, it's a campaign account.

01:23:08.000 Right.

01:23:09.000 But I don't think you can determine specifically, just to be fair, like, I don't know exactly who made it.

01:23:13.000 I'm just looking to find it.

01:23:14.000 I can't.

01:23:14.000 I'm having a hard time finding it.

01:23:15.000 Do you remember what day it went up?

01:23:18.000 A couple of days ago.

01:23:19.000 Yeah, I can't... There's literally nothing that will get me behind that.

01:23:23.000 I wouldn't vote for Joe Biden for a variety of the same reasons. 0.99

01:23:26.000 The dude's absolutely corrupt. 0.80

01:23:28.000 But there's a line as far as I'm concerned. 0.95

01:23:30.000 I complain all day about the media lying about everything non-stop. 1.00

01:23:34.000 I can certainly complain that Donald Trump is a dick. 1.00

01:23:37.000 And he's mean and he's nasty. 1.00

01:23:38.000 And he posted that image of... He says Ron with like young women or whatever. 0.98

01:23:42.000 And they try and put an angle on it.

01:23:44.000 I'm like, dude...

01:23:45.000 That's dirty politics. 0.98

01:23:47.000 I think it's disgusting. 0.98

01:23:48.000 That is not Trump AI generating a fake picture of Ron DeSantis with young women. 0.64

01:23:54.000 That is someone else posting an image and Trump retruthed it or whatever. 0.99

01:23:58.000 And I'm like, that's Trump calling people fat pigs and being kind of nasty. 0.97

01:24:02.000 Well, you know, what are you gonna do about it? 0.98

01:24:03.000 That's who he is.

01:24:04.000 If you don't like it, absolutely fine. 0.92

01:24:06.000 I have ragged on Trump's potty mouth quite a bit.

01:24:08.000 But Trump did not AI-generate a fake image of DeSantis to trick people into thinking DeSantis actually did a thing. 0.96

01:24:14.000 He reposted silly photoshops of Ron DeSantis riding his favorite animal, a rhinoceros. 0.98

01:24:20.000 It was very, very silly. 0.94

01:24:22.000 Nobody thought it was real. 0.92

01:24:23.000 Oh no, Ron was riding a rhino, now I'm not gonna vote for him.

01:24:26.000 Nah, I don't care.

01:24:27.000 Yeah, it's definitely still up.

01:24:28.000 It was posted on June 5th.

01:24:29.000 It's still up!

01:24:31.000 Does it have a community note?

01:24:33.000 Yes, I believe it does.

01:24:34.000 Not on their page.

01:24:36.000 If I click on it directly, it does not.

01:24:38.000 Really?

01:24:39.000 Because I remember after I made a video about it, it said at 25... No, yeah, it's not there.

01:24:44.000 And no community note.

01:24:46.000 Hit refresh.

01:24:49.000 Sometimes I've noticed that if I pull up a tweet and it'll look like it doesn't have a community note, and if I hit refresh, then I'll be able to see it.

01:24:57.000 Nope, did not come up with a refresh.

01:24:59.000 It'd be cool if I could turn community notes on.

01:25:01.000 Real-life Trump with some fake life images.

01:25:04.000 Are you logged in?

01:25:05.000 Yeah, into Twitter.

01:25:06.000 It says real-life Trump on it.

01:25:08.000 Yeah, um, wow.

01:25:11.000 I don't, uh, I don't see any, I don't see it.

01:25:13.000 The Santa's War Room.

01:25:15.000 It's from June 5th.

01:25:17.000 Oh, June 5th.

01:25:17.000 I'm, I'm waiting.

01:25:19.000 That was a long date.

01:25:20.000 Seven days ago.

01:25:21.000 It did have one before though.

01:25:23.000 It definitely had a community note on it on Twitter.

01:25:25.000 What do you guys think of community notes?

01:25:30.000 I used to, I mean, I like the original community note, which was called a reply, you know, upvoted reply, you know, or like upvoted replies would be fine with, well, the, but an upvote on Twitter is a retweet.

01:25:43.000 The video contains real imagery interspersed with AI-generated imagery of Trump hugging and kissing Fauci without noting they are fake.

01:25:48.000 Twitter has more engagement. So if you post something in the comments that's

01:25:54.000 got you know a picture or a link or whatever it is in my case it's it does

01:25:59.000 have a community. Mine does not that's weird. The video contains real imagery

01:26:02.000 interspersed with AI generated imagery of Trump hugging and kissing Fauci

01:26:05.000 without noting they're fake. In addition Trump could not directly fire Dr. Fauci

01:26:09.000 without the move going through the administrative judge or a late EO.

01:26:14.000 So, right.

01:26:14.000 And so this is a fair point.

01:26:15.000 Trump could not just fire Fauci.

01:26:17.000 He could have sidelined him.

01:26:18.000 He could have done things.

01:26:19.000 But he even says, like the left would have gone crazy.

01:26:21.000 He was worried of political backlash.

01:26:22.000 Well, and keep in mind, it's not just the left, but what happened when Trump fired Comey?

01:26:28.000 Right.

01:26:28.000 Did he turn into a committee?

01:26:30.000 No, no, no.

01:26:33.000 That's what started the special counsel of Mueller investigation against him for two years.

01:26:37.000 Because he fired Comey.

01:26:38.000 Dude, they still have the fake tweet up.

01:26:41.000 Like, the Dishonest Worm has not even taken down the lies and the fake news that they have made.

01:26:47.000 Look, there's nothing more deeply offensive to me than someone intentionally trying to trick people for power.

01:26:56.000 And I'm sorry, dude.

01:26:57.000 Those actually look pretty good to be honest.

01:26:59.000 They're well made.

01:27:00.000 They're really good.

01:27:01.000 Now, there is something funny about this top left image.

01:27:04.000 Not just the Mehep Wems on the White House emblem, but that Trump's arm is, his right arm is, I believe, three times longer than his left, if you've noticed.

01:27:13.000 You see Trump's hand going around Fauci's back?

01:27:15.000 Yeah, but that's because he plays golf.

01:27:16.000 That would mean that Trump's right arm is double or triple the length of his left arm.

01:27:20.000 So that's how you know that these are AI generated.

01:27:22.000 And you can also tell, it looks like the one in the bottom middle, the AI took Trump hugging the flag and then turned it into... Oh, so they took that as like a template.

01:27:34.000 Or something.

01:27:36.000 I'm sorry, dude, this is the dirtiest thing that I've seen in a long time.

01:27:39.000 And, uh, did not expect the DeSantis campaign to not only run with it... Look at Fauci's face!

01:27:47.000 He's like... He's more than happy.

01:27:52.000 He's like getting turned on.

01:27:54.000 And they're heavily ratioed on the tweet, and they have not deleted it.

01:27:58.000 They have not addressed it, nor apologized for it, and I will tell you, the longer they ignore it, the angrier I become at them.

01:28:07.000 So if Ron DeSantis is going to ignore this, if Christina Pashaw and Jeremy Redford are going to ignore this, then I have absolutely no problem saying, if Ron DeSantis is the GOP nominee, I am voting Libertarian.

01:28:20.000 Yeah, I like how you said it's like the dirtiest thing you've seen in a while.

01:28:20.000 Wow.

01:28:24.000 It's evil!

01:28:25.000 Yeah, it's relative.

01:28:26.000 Like, it's the dirtiest thing I've seen from Ron's camp.

01:28:29.000 I didn't think of him as a guy that was gonna throw mud. 0.99

01:28:31.000 I thought he was gonna be like, let's just leave this crap out of this. 0.99

01:28:34.000 That's part of his, you know... Being evil? 0.99

01:28:38.000 I mean, it's part of his argument against Trump.

01:28:41.000 Remember, so we're gonna separate Trumpism from Trump because Trump has, as you were saying earlier, Trump has baggage. 0.98

01:28:50.000 He's got a potty mouth. 0.62

01:28:51.000 He does things that cross the line.

01:28:53.000 And yet, so if you're setting yourself up though, in wrestling you would say baby face versus heel.

01:28:59.000 They say Trump's a heel, but DeSantis is a baby face.

01:29:02.000 So we run as a baby face.

01:29:03.000 So if you're running as a face, You can't do stuff that crosses the line because otherwise that's what you'd be considered a heel turner. 0.99

01:29:10.000 I will take the arrogant, loud mouth dick standing on stage calling people fat pigs but at least telling you like it is. 0.99

01:29:20.000 Excuse me, only Rosie O'Donnell. 1.00

01:29:22.000 Only Rosie O'Donnell. 0.90

01:29:23.000 Rosie. 1.00

01:29:24.000 Trump has lied about stupid things and it's usually about his ego or he fluffs things and he exaggerates things. 1.00

01:29:31.000 If the Trump campaign produces AI deepfakes directly from Trump and his rapid response director, I'll say the same thing about him. 1.00

01:29:39.000 I'm not playing these games.

01:29:41.000 They lied about Trump nonstop all day every day.

01:29:43.000 They fake impeached him twice.

01:29:45.000 They tried to convict him. 0.99

01:29:47.000 They're trying to arrest him now on completely bogus garbage. 1.00

01:29:50.000 I am sick of it! 1.00

01:29:52.000 And so, after dealing with years of the Democratic establishment constantly lying to my face and telling me that I am dumb as they come and I better believe their stupid garbage, because, and you know this, Brandon, there was a period where I, I don't think I was ever as, as, like you were Democrat, right? 0.99

01:30:10.000 You were more liberal. 0.99

01:30:11.000 Full on.

01:30:12.000 I was kind of like, well, you know, this Russia thing, maybe let's take a look at the evidence.

01:30:15.000 And then when it all comes out, I'm like, how dare you have have lied to me so aggressively?

01:30:22.000 And you saw it.

01:30:22.000 That was your story.

01:30:23.000 You want to explain my story?

01:30:25.000 Yeah.

01:30:27.000 Yeah.

01:30:27.000 I mean, for me, it was it was the media.

01:30:29.000 And it was the kind of pivotal moment for me was I voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016 and in January 2017, right around the time he was about to take office.

01:30:37.000 And I was Outraged, I posted something about how I would never be able to understand how anyone could vote for a man who mocked a reporter's disability in front of a cheering crowd.

01:30:46.000 And then that was when somebody pointed out to me for the first time, sent me a YouTube video entitled, Debunking the Trump Mocked the Disabled Reporter.

01:30:53.000 It was literally the first time in my life.

01:30:56.000 That it even dawned on me that the media that I trusted, like CNN, MSNBC, etc., was capable of completely creating a false narrative and a lie and spinning a moment out of context.

01:31:06.000 Because the whole thing about the disabled reporter was that this is a bit that he does all the time when he's imitating anybody who's flailing. 0.92

01:31:11.000 Anyone.

01:31:12.000 He did it for Ted Cruz.

01:31:13.000 Yeah, because they're caught in a lie or doing something shady or dishonest.

01:31:15.000 They set him up.

01:31:16.000 Yeah, totally.

01:31:17.000 I don't believe he's yet to do it for Ron DeSantis, but I imagine he's probably learned his lesson.

01:31:21.000 And so, the DeSantis campaign has done, effectively, what my biggest complaint about the Democrats in the media is.

01:31:28.000 Right.

01:31:29.000 Generated fake—and this is more egregious than just twisting context.

01:31:34.000 It's one thing to be like, Donald Trump said something offensive, and you're like, oh come on, show us the quote, it wasn't that bad.

01:31:39.000 It's another thing to AI-generate fake images, put real-life Trump over it, slap it on Twitter, leave it up, address it in no way despite all the complaints about it, showing us that the DeSantis campaign would absolutely use the tactics of the Democrats and the corporate establishment, and they're unwilling to apologize.

01:31:55.000 They shouldn't have done it in the first place.

01:31:56.000 But this is the most offensive thing you could have done.

01:32:00.000 The subject matter is pretty bad too, because if you look across the MAGA movement, people who maybe loved Trump and now they're not so sure if they love Trump and maybe they're thinking about DeSantis, this is going to be the deciding thing.

01:32:10.000 It's vaccines, it's Fauci, it's all that.

01:32:12.000 So this is like a key issue for people in the MAGA movement who might move away from Trump.

01:32:17.000 So they're not just lying and manipulating any random campaign issue, it's THE campaign issue that would sway people over to DeSantis.

01:32:24.000 Right, it's not just a joke. 0.97

01:32:25.000 It's not something like, it's not, it's not Trump riding a pig. 0.91

01:32:28.000 I don't know.

01:32:29.000 You know, it's, it's material.

01:32:29.000 Right.

01:32:31.000 And this, this to me, and by the way, and, and I've, I've, I've thrown this challenge out there for DeSantis supporters.

01:32:36.000 Show me one video.

01:32:37.000 So they make this line out there, they say, they say, well, I would have, and, and so DeSantis is out there today going after Trump's judicial picks on the Supreme Court, uh, coming out against them.

01:32:48.000 And then immediately, what does the Trump campaign do?

01:32:49.000 They came back and they find the official statements from Ron DeSantis supporting those judicial picks.

01:32:54.000 At the time.

01:32:55.000 So what I always say about there on the Fauci stuff, which by the way, totally cool.

01:32:59.000 You said this guy was too close to Fauci, blah, blah, blah, listen to it, all right.

01:33:02.000 Agreed.

01:33:03.000 Can you show me though, like if you're gonna make the historical argument,

01:33:07.000 can you show me one instance of Ron DeSantis calling to fire Fauci in 2020

01:33:15.000 during the same time period that he's talking about?

01:33:18.000 He said, I would have done this.

01:33:20.000 Well, yeah, that's easy to say, I would have done that years later.

01:33:23.000 Can you find any instance of showing that you would have actually been willing

01:33:27.000 to go after this issue in the time when it was actually pertinent?

01:33:31.000 Because if you can't then, and which if you've gone to and CNN's done this and the Trump campaign did this, that he was saying the exact same things that Trump was saying about Fauci at the same time frame.

01:33:42.000 So that's what gets me about all of this.

01:33:44.000 And if you like, I'm, I'm fine if you want to support DeSantis, right?

01:33:48.000 I'm not like, Oh my God, how dare you?

01:33:50.000 Right.

01:33:51.000 But at the same time, just don't gaslight me.

01:33:53.000 Do not gaslight me.

01:33:54.000 Don't lie to me.

01:33:55.000 Do not piss on my foot and tell me it's raining.

01:33:58.000 You know, I had argued a year ago that I was for DeSantis over Trump 100% because DeSantis was like a sane version of Trump for the average person.

01:34:09.000 Trumpism without Trump.

01:34:10.000 Right, he had the tact, he had leadership.

01:34:14.000 And then earlier this year I said I don't think DeSantis will actually go in and schedule a left fire, everybody like Trump is, and that's basically the only thing I think we need right now, the most important thing, I shouldn't say the only, the most important thing we need right now is termination of these bureaucrats, of these government officials who are, you know, the permanent government.

01:34:31.000 You know the only person who can do that is a guy who doesn't have to worry about re-election.

01:34:35.000 Right, and it's not just that, it's Trump wants revenge.

01:34:37.000 And so my attitude was like... It's the perfect storm.

01:34:39.000 My attitude earlier in the year was like, look, if Ted Sanders wins, we'll be happy, and we'll definitely, like, I will vote for him, I think most of us would, and we'll be like, okay, you know, this is what... I won't.

01:34:49.000 Dude, no way.

01:34:50.000 Like, I am so...

01:34:53.000 What angers me more than anything was the constant lies from the media. 0.99

01:34:57.000 It wasn't just the stop making me defend Trump trope, it was the stop treating me like I'm a moron and that you can trick me. 0.91

01:35:05.000 And the DeSantis campaign just did it, and not only that, they won't apologize for it, they won't take it down, and the DeSantis supporters are insulting me for criticizing it. 0.84

01:35:14.000 Well have they, would, I mean, I assume you've invited them on?

01:35:19.000 Yeah, in the past they've said they'd make time, they'd figure it out, and you know, we've talked about trying to get this head at some point.

01:35:28.000 I'd absolutely love to have any one of them on, and the first thing we'll do is ask them why they did it, and then have them address it.

01:35:35.000 And if they want to come on this show, they can sit down, go to their Twitter, and then screenshot it, delete it, post the screenshot and say, we've deleted this tweet, we apologize for making it, we have removed the video because it was wrong to do in the first place.

01:35:48.000 If they want to come on the show, they can do that.

01:35:51.000 Otherwise, dude, I like Dave Smith.

01:35:53.000 I like the Libertarian Party.

01:35:54.000 I don't think it's realistic.

01:35:56.000 I don't think they'll win.

01:35:56.000 I do think if you got a Dave Smith or whoever ends up running for the Libertarian Party into government, they'd fire a lot more people than Trump probably would, which is not real.

01:36:05.000 But if my choice is between, sorry, if my choice is between liars, cheaters, and manipulators, and liars, cheaters, and manipulators, I don't know.

01:36:13.000 I don't know what to say. 0.95

01:36:15.000 I mean, yeah, to my point on that with Trump is people say like, oh, well, why didn't he do this?

01:36:20.000 Why didn't he do that?

01:36:22.000 It's like, guys, grow up.

01:36:24.000 Just grow up for a second, right?

01:36:25.000 This is the first time you had someone in government that was even willing to entertain discussion of those things.

01:36:31.000 And now suddenly you're going to turn around and argue that why didn't you drain all of the swamp, right?

01:36:35.000 No, this is the first time you've actually had a situation with a critical mass movement behind him to actually achieve these things.

01:36:44.000 And if you want somebody to take this wrecking ball, as you're talking about, actually do Schedule F. If you put someone in there who's worried about re-election, who's worried about being investigated, who's worried about being smeared about, who's got to worry about all these different things, I guarantee you they are not going to anybody I agree.

01:37:01.000 right, are not going to be willing to do what has to be done because they're going to be

01:37:04.000 so worried about the next four years.

01:37:06.000 And if they're willing to make fake images to trick you, do you really believe that they're

01:37:11.000 going to fire anybody if they claim they will?

01:37:13.000 To your point, it's not that they want to trick you, it's that they want to get elected.

01:37:18.000 Yeah, so putting the election ahead.

01:37:21.000 They're already doing it.

01:37:21.000 They're putting the election ahead of the principal.

01:37:23.000 So they'll come out and they'll be like, if you elect me, I'm going to fire these bureaucrats.

01:37:28.000 No, you won't.

01:37:28.000 You're lying.

01:37:29.000 Get out of here. 0.99

01:37:30.000 You're deepfake, DeSantis. 0.93

01:37:32.000 You make fake images trying to get me to vote for you.

01:37:33.000 It's not happening.

01:37:34.000 Look, man, I think DeSantis definitely had more tact than Trump.

01:37:38.000 He didn't have the charisma.

01:37:39.000 That's fine.

01:37:40.000 And we ragged on him for it.

01:37:41.000 But this is, it's different.

01:37:44.000 I did not vote in 2012.

01:37:46.000 I did not vote in 2016.

01:37:48.000 I barely, like, 2020 was me looking at the Trump administration and being like, yo, the foreign policy was, that was, that was mainly it, the foreign policy stuff.

01:37:55.000 I thought, I thought the school choice was good.

01:37:57.000 The no wokeness in government contracting, I'm like, this is all stuff we need.

01:38:00.000 I don't actually believe Desantis at this point.

01:38:03.000 If they're going to run with this, you know, my first thought was that after covering and talking about the story, they would take it down and say we shouldn't have done that.

01:38:12.000 And it's been a week and they've done nothing.

01:38:14.000 So I'm not convinced that these are people of good moral standing.

01:38:17.000 I think these are power hungry people.

01:38:20.000 I can't speak for Ron, I don't know, but I think the people around him are just... that's it.

01:38:25.000 The DeSantis campaign feels very manufactured to me because when he had an opportunity, I don't know, six months ago to come out and announce, everyone's like, I think DeSantis is going to announce!

01:38:34.000 Weeks went by, months went by.

01:38:37.000 No, no mention of it.

01:38:38.000 It's same with Joe Biden, like running for office in 2020.

01:38:41.000 He didn't even run for president until the very end.

01:38:42.000 All of a sudden he appears out of nowhere.

01:38:44.000 It's like other people around him told him, like, I feel like people pressured Ron so much.

01:38:49.000 Like, you got to do it.

01:38:50.000 You got to do it.

01:38:51.000 You got to do it.

01:38:51.000 And he's fine.

01:38:52.000 Like, it's not that he wants to, it's that he's wanted to.

01:38:55.000 So here he is now.

01:38:56.000 We got to go to Superchats.

01:38:57.000 We are way late.

01:38:58.000 I'll be super clear about this just to respond to what you said.

01:39:00.000 And people were like, oh, but you're just a Trump shill.

01:39:03.000 It's like, look, I think Ron DeSantis would make a great president one day.

01:39:08.000 I do.

01:39:09.000 But why squabble over four years when you could put together a plan for 12?

01:39:14.000 Right?

01:39:15.000 Wouldn't that be the strategic pick right there?

01:39:18.000 To say, you do the four years, endorse, then get the endorsement on the back end, everybody moves together, so you've got four years, then four years, then four more years.

01:39:27.000 I'd have said that before this deepfake thing.

01:39:30.000 We'll see.

01:39:31.000 But let's go to Super Chats.

01:39:32.000 Alright, I'm not your buddy guy says James Comey gave up their hand when he went on CNN or MSNBC and said that Trump cannot win and paints Trump coming back vengeful ready to clean house.

01:39:42.000 Interesting.

01:39:44.000 He sounded terrified.

01:39:45.000 I saw that clip.

01:39:47.000 Donald Trump gets in here why he could be coming after all of us.

01:39:51.000 That's totally actually saying that.

01:39:53.000 Like, yes.

01:39:53.000 Raymond G. Stanley Jr.

01:39:54.000 says, who's this young guy and what have you done with Tim?

01:39:57.000 Tate had a good point from a PBD interview.

01:40:00.000 There's more of us than them, so it's all about how much we'll tolerate.

01:40:03.000 I agree.

01:40:04.000 And our tolerance is waning.

01:40:06.000 That's really it, man.

01:40:06.000 You see this Call of Duty stuff?

01:40:08.000 Nick Merckx, Tim the Tet, Disrespect?

01:40:11.000 These are like...

01:40:13.000 Modern celebrities, high-profile internet personalities, famous to the point where you could play as them in the game.

01:40:21.000 Tim the Tatman says, take me off this game if you're doing this to my buddy.

01:40:24.000 And they were like, oh, okay, I guess.

01:40:27.000 They're reeling from it.

01:40:27.000 And the funny thing is, after Nick Merck said, leave the kids alone, and they all attacked him for it, and they pulled his skin off, his his

01:40:36.000 It is funny all the news reports No, no, but I want to point this out all the news reports

01:40:40.000 say Are they the Aztecs Tim?

01:40:42.000 All the news reports say Activision removes Tim the Tatman's skin

01:40:47.000 after and it's like He's gaming skin

01:40:51.000 Removes his skin They flayed him alive 1.00

01:40:55.000 No I forgot what I was going to say I don't know Oh yeah they doubled down

01:40:59.000 They posted a pro pride tweet got ratioed posted another one and locked comments

01:41:03.000 comments. So, but, but I think I'm not gonna make, no, I just think, I think it shows that

01:41:08.000 I was going to say, if you're allowing pro-pride skins in Call of Duty, which is a game where the players kill each other, then does that mean you're cheating?

01:41:17.000 Yeah, I understand.

01:41:18.000 Just saying.

01:41:19.000 You can do that, but you can't offend them.

01:41:21.000 Right.

01:41:22.000 Redfield says, Public Square installed.

01:41:24.000 Thank you.

01:41:25.000 We are big fans of Public Square.

01:41:27.000 Parallel economy.

01:41:30.000 La revolution culturelle avec Yann Rochdy.

01:41:34.000 I don't speak French properly, but... Love from Quebec!

01:41:36.000 Before the stream is shut down, I work for a French-Canadian independent media called Lux Media.

01:41:41.000 Say Civil War, Tim.

01:41:42.000 Drink one shot.

01:41:43.000 Ha ha! 0.86

01:41:44.000 Good luck!

01:41:45.000 Good sir, good luck.

01:41:48.000 What do we got?

01:41:48.000 Trash Panda says, how is what Hunter and Joe done not high treason?

01:41:53.000 We're at the brink of war because of them, and they're clearly not loyal to our Republic.

01:41:56.000 The Ukraine stuff might actually be treason. 0.53

01:41:59.000 So bribery is actually delineated as an impeachable offense in the Constitution.

01:42:04.000 It is.

01:42:05.000 So everybody knows the Constitution says high crimes and misdemeanors, right?

01:42:09.000 But right before that, the Founding Fathers in the original Constitution, 1789 into 1791, actually wrote out that bribery of the presidency is one of the direct impeachable offense.

01:42:24.000 Like, you must impeach if you have evidence of this.

01:42:27.000 Wow.

01:42:28.000 David Murdock Art says, special thanks to Mr. Strzok.

01:42:32.000 Without him, Drag the Dead may have never found its walkaway hero, Zayn Dimaj, to battle through the pearl-clutching zombie apocalypse.

01:42:41.000 Game is done, awaiting the okay from Steam.

01:42:43.000 Hashtag counterculture, drag the dead.

01:42:46.000 Interesting.

01:42:47.000 Cool.

01:42:48.000 People should take a look.

01:42:49.000 Jadavs is trying to get pedantic.

01:42:52.000 He says, Tim, did you share fake news calling a one-foot nollie 360, quote, nollie cab on purpose?

01:42:57.000 A version of a typo in the title?

01:43:00.000 Ah, my child, let me explain to you the etymology of the nollie cab.

01:43:06.000 For those that aren't familiar, there's a maneuver that was invented a long time ago in skateboarding called the caballerial.

01:43:11.000 It is a fakie 360.

01:43:13.000 It's a fakie backside 360.

01:43:15.000 What that means is fakie means you're riding backwards.

01:43:18.000 Backside means your spin is with your back Towards the front, so if you have your left foot forward, it's clockwise, and a 360 is a 300-degree spin.

01:43:29.000 The reason why some people take issue is that I did a one-foot nollie 360.

01:43:34.000 I posted it on Instagram.

01:43:36.000 I put nollie cab, and people said, that's not a real thing, you can't call it that because a caballerial is fakie.

01:43:42.000 The reason this emerged, the phrase nollie cab, is because in playing a game of skate, which is where your opponent does a trick, then you have to do the same trick, and if they mess up, then you do the trick, you get letters, it's basically the game of horse.

01:43:53.000 Someone would do what is called a nollie frontside 360. 0.93

01:43:57.000 But if you don't know a person's stance, whether they are left foot forward or right foot forward, it looks the same as a caballerial.

01:44:05.000 So somebody would say, alright, your turn, it's your trick.

01:44:08.000 The person would do a nollie 360, and they would go, uh, was that a cab?

01:44:12.000 And they would go, nollie. 0.96

01:44:14.000 Nollie cab. 1.00

01:44:15.000 That's where the phrase comes from.

01:44:16.000 So yes, it is an appropriate colloquial term in skateboarding, but a lot of nitpickers in skateboarding are like, that's not a real trick!

01:44:22.000 And this has been your skateboarding history with Tim Pool.

01:44:25.000 Uh, anyway.

01:44:28.000 Aaron says, Bill Barr knew the entire time.

01:44:30.000 Yep, sure did.

01:44:32.000 Did nothing about it.

01:44:34.000 Isn't it amazing?

01:44:36.000 I mean, Bill Barr, a lot of these guys, they're institutionalists, right?

01:44:39.000 They exist to... I mean, keep in mind, Bill Barr is the same guy who raised money to defend the sniper from Ruby Ridge.

01:44:48.000 Same guy.

01:44:49.000 So, these guys exist to hold up the institution.

01:44:52.000 Well, Trump hired them.

01:44:54.000 Fix the credibility of the institution and not actually go after these types of crimes.

01:45:00.000 Oh, we have another correction.

01:45:01.000 Kaiser Outdoor says, It's a nollie backside 360, Tim. 1.00

01:45:04.000 You are also incorrect.

01:45:06.000 When riding nollie, frontside remains frontside.

01:45:08.000 When riding fakie, it inverts.

01:45:10.000 So, sorry sir, you are wrong.

01:45:12.000 See, like, you know, my view of skateboarding is I have, like, a very logical mind, and so I, like, the structure in my mind is very mathematical, not just... There's a lot of people who skate, and the way they explain it, it's more feels.

01:45:25.000 No, I'm all math.

01:45:26.000 So, like, the structure and the logic of the system has to make sense.

01:45:29.000 It's like an architect versus a gardener.

01:45:32.000 That's right.

01:45:34.000 Or the architect versus the engineer.

01:45:38.000 The architect will draw the schematics of what it wants to look like and the engineer goes, I will figure it out.

01:45:44.000 Like, how am I going to get that thing to do that?

01:45:47.000 Let's grab some more Real Super Chats and I'll stop talking about skateboarding.

01:45:51.000 What do we got?

01:45:52.000 Nexttheslayer says, would you kindly make a full video on the history of the Biden investigation around Burisma, then link it somewhere conspicuous for easy reference?

01:46:00.000 I know you've done it before, but Rumble and YouTube searches pull up nonsense.

01:46:04.000 Yeah, I wonder if Hannah Clare would want to do something like that. 1.00

01:46:06.000 Like a 10 minute breakdown explainer of the whole Burisma scandal.

01:46:11.000 And just like a mini doc explaining like, here's how the company started, here's who was involved.

01:46:14.000 There was a CIA director on the board.

01:46:16.000 It wasn't just Hunter Biden.

01:46:17.000 Yeah.

01:46:20.000 So, Kofur Black was his name?

01:46:21.000 And the fact that Burisma is a gas company, by the way, I think should not escape everyone's notice.

01:46:25.000 You've got the gas prime gas monopoly. I mean the thing goes deeper than and and honestly it could all go back

01:46:25.000 Yup.

01:46:31.000 And the fact that Burisma is a gas company by the way, I think should not escape everyone's notice

01:46:35.000 Yep What do we got

01:46:40.000 Vaughn Sinful says good news on the culture front and if you like comics rip a verse is that reverse isom

01:46:48.000 Number 2 pre-order campaign launched today and it's already over $700,000.

01:46:51.000 Wow!

01:46:54.000 Eric July, man! 1.00

01:46:56.000 Killing it! 0.99

01:46:57.000 Absolutely amazing. 0.99

01:46:59.000 Cool.

01:47:01.000 Let's grab some more.

01:47:06.000 Hey Tim and gang, I'm a history buff and it feels like we're living in similar times pre-WWI, but feels like the American Civil War and the next Great War will happen at the same time.

01:47:21.000 Thoughts?

01:47:22.000 Agreed.

01:47:23.000 Yeah, if there was an American civil war, that would be part of a world war.

01:47:28.000 Well, if you actually look at World War One, from Russia's perspective, so Russia gets involved in World War One, but then experiences a civil war internally, which was fanned and supported by the Germans.

01:47:43.000 Um, sending Lenin and this, you know, the infamous train into, uh, St.

01:47:48.000 Petersburg and then Moscow in order to knock Russia out of the war. 0.81

01:47:52.000 So if we were to enter directly into an actual war right now, this would be the perfect opportunity for one of America's adversaries to then go in and start inflaming that point to where we actually break out into it.

01:48:06.000 So, I mean, this is, it's been followed exactly.

01:48:09.000 And you look at the, the neo-Bolsheviks of today and the Bolsheviks of that time, Go read Always with Honor by Piotr Wrangel, best book on

01:48:16.000 this subject whatsoever.

01:48:18.000 Yeah, watch out for people making the American military industrial complex the villain. I'm not

01:48:23.000 full on board like, yay, American military industrial, but they use the Russian emperor

01:48:27.000 as the villain to get their cultural revolution over. If they're going to try and make the war 0.54

01:48:31.000 machine the villain to create some cultural revolution that could create something much

01:48:34.000 worse. So don't fall for that. Cassandra Fairbanks wrote an obituary for Ted Kaczynski.

01:48:40.000 And there's a whole bunch of stuff this guy wrote about how the left,

01:48:44.000 if given control of technology, will use it to oppress people.

01:48:47.000 And he very much explained- Well, that's crazy!

01:48:50.000 Yeah! 0.92

01:48:51.000 I mean, the dude was- was crazy.

01:48:52.000 Sorry. 0.97

01:48:53.000 Like, he- he sent bombs to people. 1.00

01:48:54.000 Like, that's- that's- there's- you're nuts. 1.00

01:48:56.000 Ted Kaczynski. 0.99

01:48:57.000 He just passed away, didn't he?

01:48:58.000 Unabomber.

01:48:58.000 Right, yeah.

01:48:59.000 He was also one of the early subjects in MKUltra.

01:49:01.000 That's right.

01:49:02.000 Very, very creepy and weird.

01:49:02.000 Yup.

01:49:04.000 Around 16, 17.

01:49:06.000 I think it was Stick Sex and Hammer who made a really great point and he said, just because someone may be a bad person with bad ideas does not mean other ideas they have that are good are bad.

01:49:15.000 So Ted Kaczynski saying that the right will do things that are bad, here's what they'll do.

01:49:19.000 The left will do things that are bad, here's what they'll do.

01:49:21.000 It's like, those are really good points from a very bad person, you know?

01:49:23.000 And sometimes really great people will have horrendous ideas.

01:49:27.000 Don't follow people blindly, ever.

01:49:27.000 Scary.

01:49:29.000 Yeah.

01:49:30.000 Uchala says, on Joe Rogan, Theo Vaughn talked about having year-old episodes with RFK Jr.

01:49:36.000 taken down in the last couple of weeks.

01:49:38.000 He had no idea why.

01:49:40.000 By the way, on that point earlier about Kaczynski, how many people was Nelson Mandela responsible for killing when he was endorsing and supporting terrorist activity?

01:49:49.000 Go look up necklacing in South Africa.

01:49:51.000 Oh, did you see?

01:49:52.000 Well, Norm Macdonald has that funny joke.

01:49:55.000 He says, you know, I was looking through history and I was reading that the good guys won every war.

01:49:59.000 The good guys won every war.

01:50:05.000 That's actually a really great way of putting it.

01:50:07.000 Yeah.

01:50:07.000 That dude was a genius.

01:50:09.000 Rest in peace.

01:50:12.000 Where we at?

01:50:14.000 Joshua Guthrie says wife just had a baby and listening to the show.

01:50:18.000 I hope you were there with your wife having the baby.

01:50:22.000 It just happened!

01:50:23.000 Yeah, it just happened.

01:50:24.000 We're like, doing the show.

01:50:25.000 It's like, your wife's in labor and you're like, gotta put on Tim Kast.

01:50:29.000 Well, it's like Mozart, but now it's... When he says wife had a baby and listening to the show, it sounds like his wife is in labor and like, put on Tim Kast!

01:50:36.000 Can't miss it, Posto's on!

01:50:39.000 He's gotta do the promo code!

01:50:40.000 Posto tweeted, he's gotta do the promo code!

01:50:43.000 Which one?

01:50:44.000 Tanya?

01:50:45.000 Promo code Tanya does not exist.

01:50:45.000 Whoa!

01:50:48.000 You're talking about deepfakes, you're bringing up promo codes that definitely 100% do not exist and only the most despicable, vile people would degenerate even using false promo codes.

01:51:02.000 T-A-N-Y-A? 0.98

01:51:03.000 Yeah, T-A-N-Y-A. 1.00

01:51:04.000 Make sure it's not an O, it's an A. Tanya.

01:51:06.000 Yeah, Tanya.

01:51:07.000 Polarize says, Tim, you were angry at DeSantis for using a deepfake to show Trump hugging Fauci the other day, but if Trump and others, even the left, start using deepfakes to smear others, would you still decry Iran?

01:51:18.000 Why would I not?

01:51:19.000 My anger over making fake images to trick people into giving up their rights and their power doesn't end when other people start doing it.

01:51:28.000 It's like, Oh, look, there's groomers in that school.

01:51:31.000 What's that?

01:51:31.000 There's other groomers?

01:51:32.000 Guys, I don't care anymore.

01:51:34.000 That literally makes no sense.

01:51:35.000 If Trump started doing it, I will say the same thing.

01:51:39.000 If the left... The left always does it!

01:51:41.000 That's what they do!

01:51:42.000 Deepfakes, I believe, the first ever done was Ron DeSantis' campaign.

01:51:46.000 But the Democrats have been lying about everything.

01:51:49.000 They even lie about Trump lying about everything.

01:51:51.000 It's hilarious.

01:51:51.000 They're like, did you know that Trump lied about this?

01:51:52.000 And I'm like, oh, what did he say?

01:51:53.000 And then they lie about what he said.

01:51:55.000 And I'm like, he never said that.

01:51:56.000 You're lying.

01:51:57.000 It's it's it's insane.

01:51:58.000 I know, dude.

01:51:59.000 I mean, they have an entire indictment that doesn't even mention the fact that the president is allowed to declassify whatever he wants.

01:52:06.000 Or that, you know, Hillary Clinton did this and we all complained about it and they ignored it.

01:52:10.000 But she was never president. 0.99

01:52:11.000 That's my point.

01:52:12.000 No, what I'm saying is that what she did was no question worse.

01:52:17.000 She did not have plenary declassification powers.

01:52:19.000 She just had public records on a private server that she had destroyed. 0.95

01:52:24.000 Which at one point were being emailed to her by Jake Sullivan, who is the current National Security Advisor right now under Biden.

01:52:32.000 These people are evil, man.

01:52:34.000 She'd fire so many emails over to Jake Sullivan when they're classified. 0.98

01:52:38.000 It is not hypocrisy, it's hierarchy.

01:52:41.000 What people like about Trump, what I like about Trump is that for all of his, you know, kind of brash attitude, he just says it.

01:52:49.000 The famous moment when he goes in front of the helicopters at the White House and he's like, we got a tremendous deal!

01:52:54.000 We're selling weapons to Saudi Arabia! 1.00

01:52:56.000 We're gonna make a lot of money!

01:52:58.000 And all the left was just like, he just admitted it.

01:53:02.000 He just admitted what the U.S.

01:53:04.000 does, sending weapons to these foreign countries to make money.

01:53:07.000 It's like, yes.

01:53:09.000 When the Syria thing, when he was like, we're getting our troops out, but we're going to keep a little bit in there for the oil, because we want their oil, you know?

01:53:15.000 It's just like, he's just admitting what we're doing!

01:53:18.000 It's amazing!

01:53:21.000 The Intercept called him the most honest and dishonest president we've ever had.

01:53:24.000 Because he lies about seemingly inane things that are related to his ego, but tells the truth about the horrible things the country has been doing.

01:53:32.000 You know, NATO is not paying its fair share, and, you know, all of that stuff.

01:53:35.000 The border.

01:53:36.000 Four years of peace and prosperity, baby.

01:53:38.000 But then you ask him about, like...

01:53:40.000 You know, his golden toilet or something and he's gonna tell you that he's the best and his house has all of these, you know, golden toilets or whatever.

01:53:46.000 I'm kidding about golden toilets.

01:53:48.000 But I mean, figuratively, if you ask him about his status or stature, he'll be hyperbolic as he can, he'll exaggerate because he wants to be big.

01:53:56.000 But then he'll just tell you exactly what the US is doing.

01:53:59.000 They did not like that.

01:54:01.000 He was the first person on the Republican side to come out against the Iraq War.

01:54:06.000 Yeah.

01:54:06.000 And he just outright said, your brother lied to us.

01:54:09.000 I was watching the clip.

01:54:11.000 Torched.

01:54:12.000 It was uncomfortable watching Jeb Bush in that moment because Jeb was just like, Like, he went into the crumple zone.

01:54:18.000 He was like, he actually, he was like an accordion, just squeezing out.

01:54:22.000 Please clap!

01:54:22.000 He was like, please stop.

01:54:23.000 Please clap.

01:54:24.000 Please stop doing it.

01:54:25.000 Because he knew there was no response.

01:54:26.000 There was no response.

01:54:27.000 You know, there is a way to do the please clap without being cringey, right?

01:54:31.000 What do you mean?

01:54:32.000 There is a way to tell people to clap without going, please clap.

01:54:35.000 You do the hands, you go, come on everybody, let's go!

01:54:37.000 You know, if you, like, nobody would have said anything if Jeb said something, something that's good, right?

01:54:44.000 Come on, you agree?

01:54:45.000 Everyone would have just clapped and cheered.

01:54:46.000 Instead he goes, please clap.

01:54:48.000 Well, this just happened in Oklahoma with Governor Stitt.

01:54:52.000 Oh, really?

01:54:53.000 He did a police clap?

01:54:54.000 He didn't do a police clap, but he kind of did, you know, going back to wrestling, it's like the promo.

01:54:59.000 So he does the promo for DeSantis and says, if you have a clip, it'll make more sense.

01:55:04.000 But he goes, he goes, and we all like Governor Ron DeSantis!

01:55:08.000 And there's that pregnant pause and nobody does anything.

01:55:12.000 And then he goes, Connecticut, amen!

01:55:14.000 And then everybody cheers.

01:55:17.000 But that was better than police clap.

01:55:19.000 It was definitely that pregnant pause where, and whatever, I'll be fair, right, maybe they didn't know they were supposed to, like maybe they thought he was going to keep going or something, whatever, but he was clearly looking for an applause line and didn't get one, so then he goes, KINNEGAN AND AMEN!

01:55:32.000 I think that's right.

01:55:35.000 Page 22 says deep fakes can go one of two ways, political cartoon funnies or intentional

01:55:39.000 manipulation of the truth.

01:55:41.000 When people made fake images of Trump fighting with cops and being arrested, I thought it

01:55:45.000 was funny.

01:55:46.000 Like, dude, Trump was not arrested.

01:55:48.000 The images were clearly fake. 0.60

01:55:50.000 You could tell it was silly and people were like, can't wait to see something like this happen.

01:55:53.000 And we know we're getting dangerously close, but like, it's not real.

01:55:59.000 Well, he did attack his own secret service agents and take over the presidential limo, the beast, and drive up onto the steps of the U.S.

01:56:08.000 Capitol directly targeting Nancy.

01:56:11.000 And that's, and that's exactly what I'm talking about.

01:56:13.000 They lied.

01:56:15.000 It's just, the lie is insane.

01:56:16.000 I think, wasn't Trump not even in that vehicle at the time?

01:56:19.000 He was in an SUV or something?

01:56:20.000 Or, no, no, no.

01:56:21.000 He was in the motorcade and there's a barrier between him and the driver.

01:56:25.000 Obviously.

01:56:27.000 Jason Hutchinson says Jazz Jennings in Florida bothers me more than political smear in campaigns.

01:56:32.000 That was another thing that the DeSantis campaign tried brushing off and ignoring.

01:56:36.000 When I was like, where's Ron DeSantis on this?

01:56:39.000 You know what I think?

01:56:40.000 What's Jazz Jennings?

01:56:42.000 Jazz Jennings was transitioned from boy to girl, pre-pubescent, and then underwent Full surgery, full sex change operation at 17, and then I believe at the age of 20, Jazz posted an Instagram in Florida saying, getting another surgery, and this was during the DeSantis administration.

01:57:05.000 And so, there's a video that went viral of what clearly shows child abuse happening to Jazz as a child, and Jazz being depressed, and, you know, people are like, this is, we need help, we need child protective services.

01:57:17.000 Now Jazz is an adult, so, I don't know what you do there.

01:57:19.000 Oh, I think I remember this, because they're older now.

01:57:22.000 Yeah, and I said, this is all happening in Florida?

01:57:25.000 Where's Ron DeSantis?

01:57:27.000 And then Ron DeSantis' campaign people started attacking me, insulting me, and saying Ron doesn't have a time machine and can't go back in time to stop this from happening.

01:57:35.000 And then a bunch of people pointed out, no, Jazz was 20 years old and living in Florida under Governor DeSantis getting one of these surgeries.

01:57:44.000 And they're lying.

01:57:45.000 And it's the weirdest thing because they could have, one, said nothing.

01:57:49.000 Two, said, we are working on it.

01:57:51.000 Winky emoji.

01:57:53.000 And then, oh cool, fantastic.

01:57:55.000 Instead they went full on attack.

01:57:57.000 I wonder if their actual goal is to make sure Ron can't actually win.

01:58:01.000 Because it's weird how fervent Ron DeSantis supporters are.

01:58:04.000 I gotta be honest, it's very weird.

01:58:06.000 It's like, here's the thing I don't like about DeSantis, and then they'll just post a whole bunch of lies about you and start attacking you.

01:58:10.000 They started calling me a grifter because I was like, hey man, what's up with this?

01:58:15.000 The reality is I think that Ron DeSantis knows that if he actually does anything substantive in targeting an individual, he'll get annihilated in the press and he doesn't want it.

01:58:25.000 A lot of the stuff that he has signed comes from the Florida Republican Legislature.

01:58:30.000 Will Ron be able to actually do anything with a Democrat-controlled Congress?

01:58:35.000 The real victory would come in 2024 if the Republicans sweep.

01:58:40.000 Good luck.

01:58:40.000 They better get on that.

01:58:41.000 Call Scott Pressler.

01:58:42.000 It's their only hope.

01:58:44.000 If I can plug, we will have Scott Pressler, as well as Tucker Carlson, we will not be censoring him, Donald Trump, myself, Charlie Kirk, and Steve Bannon, this coming up July 15th, 16th, West Palm Beach, Turning Point Action Conference.

01:58:59.000 Scott Pressler, we've just announced Turning Point Action $5 million deal with him, just in the state of Wisconsin, directly targeting ballot harvesting.

01:59:08.000 Wow.

01:59:09.000 Right on.

01:59:11.000 And that's 5 million just for Wisconsin.

01:59:12.000 There... Well, I can't say anything yet, but there's discussions of more.

01:59:17.000 Aaron Tabor says the Deep Floyd model can generate AI images with legible text.

01:59:21.000 It's already here.

01:59:22.000 Get ready for fun times as other models follow suit.

01:59:25.000 I went through my Instagram, and I was showing a skate video to a friend.

01:59:29.000 And as I'm scrolling down, I posted a picture and it said, I asked an AI to generate an image of Nancy Pelosi and here's what it made.

01:59:36.000 And it was the most freakish and disgusting image.

01:59:39.000 And that was the point.

01:59:40.000 But one year ago, it could not make a clear image of Pelosi.

01:59:44.000 One year later, you can make an indistinguishable photo of Nancy Pelosi banging the gavel in Congress.

01:59:52.000 Those pictures with Fauci are, I mean, If I didn't remember 2020, I think they were real.

01:59:58.000 Yeah, I think in the future people will remember those pictures as being real.

02:00:03.000 They're gonna say this.

02:00:06.000 The one of him with the cops pulling him.

02:00:08.000 There's gonna be people who saw that video and didn't think twice.

02:00:13.000 And in six months, they're going to be like, yeah, well, you know, Trump was all buddy, buddy, hugging Fauci and all that.

02:00:18.000 And they're going to be like, no, he didn't.

02:00:19.000 But I saw the pictures.

02:00:21.000 Because because the real war isn't necessarily over what's on Twitter or what's on YouTube.

02:00:28.000 It's over memories.

02:00:30.000 It's the memories of the people who see it.

02:00:34.000 And so if I can implant an image in your mind, because humans are visual creatures, right?

02:00:39.000 Our prefrontal cortex, everything is set up for vision.

02:00:43.000 Text is something that came up way, way, way later.

02:00:46.000 So the idea that we are set to remember all of these images that we see and be affected by those images.

02:00:52.000 That's why, I mean, we're enacting, right?

02:00:54.000 You get this.

02:00:56.000 That is why those images and the argument, I think, is a strong one for being very careful with this.

02:01:05.000 All right, if you haven't already, would you kindly smash that like button, subscribe to this channel, share the show with your friends, and become a member by going to TimCast.com and clicking join us.

02:01:14.000 We are about to launch the members only uncensored portion of the show, and you don't want to miss it, where we will have many of you calling in to talk to us and our guests.

02:01:22.000 So it'll be a lot of fun.

02:01:23.000 Smash the like button, subscribe to this channel.

02:01:25.000 You can find us on Instagram and wherever else at TimCast IRL.

02:01:29.000 You can follow me personally everywhere at TimCast.

02:01:31.000 Brandon, do you want to shout anything out?

02:01:34.000 Yeah, I just want to encourage everyone to check out our app, WalkAway Social.

02:01:37.000 We got off of Facebook, now we've moved the WalkAway movement to our own app, so you can load it if you're an Android or iPhone user.

02:01:42.000 Go to your app store, load WalkAway Social.

02:01:44.000 Check us out, it's awesome!

02:01:48.000 Very cool.

02:01:48.000 I already mentioned Turning Point Action, of course.

02:01:50.000 Make sure you're there.

02:01:51.000 Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon, Donald J. Trump, Scott Pressler, Jack Posobiec, Charlie Kirk, we're all going to be there.

02:01:57.000 Also my own show, live 2 p.m.

02:02:00.000 every day during the week.

02:02:02.000 Keep your eyes open this Thursday.

02:02:03.000 Charlie and I have a little something cooked up.

02:02:06.000 Uh, I'm Ian Cross, and yo, you may have saw us sipping on this liquid death.

02:02:10.000 It's, uh, delicious sparkling water, and we're not, uh, being paid to advertise this stuff, but, uh, I really like this stuff.

02:02:16.000 Well, yeah, it's because it's metal.

02:02:18.000 It's metal, it's not in plastic.

02:02:19.000 So we've been, you know how I always rag on plastic?

02:02:22.000 And we got, like, the glass bottles?

02:02:24.000 So, uh...

02:02:26.000 We started buying liquid death for our bottled water.

02:02:28.000 It's a canned water.

02:02:30.000 Sweetened with agave nectar.

02:02:32.000 Well, those are the flavored ones.

02:02:33.000 Yeah.

02:02:34.000 But like, I guess the company initially was just selling water in cans.

02:02:37.000 Yeah.

02:02:37.000 And like, metal's better than plastic, so.

02:02:39.000 So.

02:02:39.000 It's pretty good.

02:02:40.000 Thumbs up, guys.

02:02:41.000 Nice, nice product.

02:02:42.000 Thanks for having it.

02:02:43.000 Thanks for getting it.

02:02:44.000 Yeah.

02:02:44.000 What's up, Serge?

02:02:45.000 Uh, yeah.

02:02:46.000 That was a good one, guys.

02:02:47.000 I appreciate it.

02:02:48.000 I appreciate always seeing you here, Brendan.

02:02:51.000 Let's get to this after show.

02:02:52.000 Get it done.

02:02:53.000 We will see you all over at TimCast.com in about a minute or so.

Timcast IRL - Tim Pool - June 12, 2023

Timcast IRL - Biden Ukraine Corruption SECRETLY RECORDED, Trump VOWS Prosecution w-Straka & Poso

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript