Triggered - Donald Trump Jr - September 14, 2026


Chris Rufo is Exposing Even More Left-Wing Fraud, Full Coverage! | Triggered Ep.374

Let Us Never Forget What Charlie Stood For, My Remarks Live From Dallas | Triggered Ep.373

Episode Stats


Length

56 minutes

Words per minute

154.99

Word count

8,690

Sentence count

557

Harmful content

Misogyny

19

sentences flagged

Toxicity

4

sentences flagged

Hate speech

22

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcripts from "Triggered - Donald Trump Jr" are sourced from the Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool. Explore them interactively here.
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:06:21.000 Hey guys, welcome to another huge episode of Trigger.
00:06:24.000 Today, we're following the money, following the fraud, following the corruption.
00:06:29.000 And nobody follows it better than our guest, Chris Ruffo, a journalist who I'm sure many of you already follow.
00:06:36.000 He's been on the show before, a great guy.
00:06:38.000 He put critical race theory on the map, meaning it was out there.
00:06:43.000 He put it on the map so everyone knew how insane it actually was.
00:06:46.000 And now he's tearing the lid off fraud all across California.
00:06:51.000 And as insane as it gets every week, It somehow, amazingly, keeps getting worse.
00:07:00.000 So, guys, make sure you're liking, sharing, subscribing so you never miss one of these major episodes.
00:07:05.000 If you do miss the show here on Rumble, go over to Apple, go over to Spotify, catch it there.
00:07:10.000 And for all of the top headlines that we cover on the show, go check out my news app, MXM News, like minute by minute, Mike X Ray Mike, where you can get the mainstream news without the mainstream bias.
00:07:21.000 And of course, as always, don't forget about our brave sponsors for having the guts to support this program.
00:07:28.000 That ain't easy.
00:07:29.000 Check them out, support those who share your values.
00:07:32.000 These are things that are important, and we need to do it.
00:07:35.000 We talk about gold and silver for years.
00:07:36.000 Now, it's a great way to actually diversify your portfolio.
00:07:41.000 That's why I've renewed my partnership with the number one rated gold company, Goldco.
00:07:45.000 Goldco has helped tens of thousands of Americans place over $3 billion in gold and silver, and you can convert an existing IRA or 401k into an IRA in gold.
00:07:56.000 And you can do it all tax free.
00:07:58.000 And that's a big deal.
00:08:00.000 Gold Co. has earned thousands of five star reviews for their exceptional customer service, and they will walk you through the entire process.
00:08:07.000 Like I always say, educate yourself and learn more.
00:08:12.000 Request their free 2026 gold and silver kit to make sure you have the tools to prepare for the future.
00:08:19.000 And they're actually offering up a special 10% back in bonus silver or gold just for getting started.
00:08:26.000 So visit donjrgold.com to learn more.
00:08:30.000 That's d o n j r gold.com.
00:08:34.000 Well, guys, joining me now, senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute and a contributing editor at the City Journal, Christopher Ruffo.
00:08:41.000 Chris, great to have you back, man.
00:08:43.000 It's great to see you again.
00:08:45.000 So, listen, you've popped the lid on a bunch of these sort of insane stories about stuff that's been going on around the country that maybe we saw in the periphery, but you really exposed a lot of that.
00:08:56.000 So, let's start with the new one, though the story you published recently.
00:09:01.000 A California medical supply company pulled more than $40 million.
00:09:05.000 Output transcript Out of the Medi Cal program since 2020.
00:09:09.000 They went from about $8,000 in 2020 to almost $19 million in 2024.
00:09:15.000 I mean, the owner is sitting in a $28 million mansion in a pretty quick period of time, seemingly from nothing.
00:09:24.000 Tell people what you've found and what people need to really start looking for.
00:09:29.000 Because, I mean, this is literally just coming right out of the American taxpayer pocket.
00:09:33.000 Yeah, that's right.
00:09:34.000 I mean, experts at HHS, at Harvard, and other places.
00:09:39.000 told us that California is losing up to $50 billion a year to Medicaid fraud.
00:09:44.000 And so we started sifting through the data and we found this really interesting case.
00:09:48.000 It was a man who was a respiratory therapist.
00:09:51.000 He was selling plastic breathing tubes.
00:09:53.000 He'd pulled in all this money flying in private jets, bought a mansion next door to the Kardashians.
00:09:59.000 But we dug into the numbers and something was very suspicious.
00:10:03.000 You had all the red flags, the experts said, for Medicaid fraud.
00:10:07.000 And then we actually hit the pavement.
00:10:09.000 We went to every known address.
00:10:11.000 Every listed place of business, and there was zero sign that the company even existed.
00:10:17.000 There was no office, there was no working phone line, there was no warehouse, there was no production facility.
00:10:23.000 And so, what you have is this ghost business that is harvesting millions of dollars in cash out of the Medicaid system, and nobody is looking at all.
00:10:32.000 And what we realized is that this Medicaid millionaire phenomenon is not just this story, but it's replicated thousands and thousands of times all over the United States.
00:10:44.000 Yeah, obviously, we saw it with the hospice fraud in Minnesota.
00:10:48.000 You're seeing the stuff that Dr. Oz and Secretary Kennedy have discovered around the place.
00:10:53.000 I know JD Vance is working hard on the sort of the fraud playbook, but you found this, but this is not a one off deal.
00:11:01.000 I mean, there's probably thousands of these things going on.
00:11:04.000 What do you think the tune of all this money really adds up to?
00:11:09.000 I asked that exact question to Treasury Secretary Scott Besson, and he told me that the best estimates from the federal government are that American.
00:11:18.000 Taxpayers lose between $300 and $600 billion per year.
00:11:22.000 Billions.
00:11:23.000 Billions.
00:11:24.000 Billions with a B.
00:11:25.000 So we're talking about a half a trillion dollars a year that just gets wiped out.
00:11:30.000 And there's another dirty little secret that we found in our reporting on this issue.
00:11:34.000 We talked to fraud investigators up and down the West Coast, and they said something like 90% of that fraud cash ends up overseas.
00:11:43.000 And so the whole world, fraudsters, criminal organizations, drug gangs for all over the world have realized that.
00:11:51.000 The American public medical system is a soft target and they're just looting our country hand over fist.
00:11:59.000 Okay, so listen, you're really good at this stuff.
00:12:01.000 You can find it, but how is it that there's not, you know, other than the new task force that's been formed, how is it that this has just been able to go on, presumably for decades, and no one's even bothered to check?
00:12:15.000 I just don't even understand.
00:12:16.000 As a guy that runs businesses and you're accounting for everything, and I, you know, I know when we had a hotel in DC, they made sure that, you know, because my father was president during the first term, You know, they had to audit us if, you know, if a foreign, you know, government official bought a cheeseburger, we got to get audited because that was emoluments, you know, $12 cheeseburger.
00:12:36.000 That was a big problem.
00:12:37.000 But $500 billion a year is just surrounding error.
00:12:44.000 What do we care?
00:12:45.000 So it's such an important question and brilliantly put.
00:12:48.000 And there's a couple of reasons why people haven't been looking.
00:12:51.000 A, you know, you're spending person A's money, goes through person B's federal institution that benefits person C.
00:13:00.000 And so, The incentives aren't really aligned.
00:13:02.000 It's not like a private company that has a bottom line.
00:13:04.000 The government has essentially an infinite bottom line.
00:13:07.000 There's no discipline built into the system.
00:13:10.000 The second thing is really interesting, and this is something we've also uncovered, especially in California, is that actually a lot of this money that gets really misappropriated, that gets stolen, that gets exaggerated, ends up benefiting labor unions.
00:13:24.000 And so the California health sector labor unions, they actually benefit from all this money sloshing through the system.
00:13:31.000 They take their cut, they don't ask any questions.
00:13:34.000 And in fact, They've dismantled the oversight.
00:13:37.000 They've dismantled the regulations that would actually bring some accountability into the system.
00:13:42.000 And there's another really important point why nobody's looking is that it's such a massive amount of money.
00:13:49.000 The federal government itself has kept a tight lid on that data.
00:13:52.000 And the only reason we were able to actually find these individual stories of alleged, likely fraud is that Elon's Doge kids actually made all of this data open source.
00:14:04.000 They finally, for the first time since the 1960s, allowed the public access to figuring out where all this money is going.
00:14:13.000 And so that was a huge part of this.
00:14:16.000 It was a black box nobody could look into for many decades.
00:14:20.000 Now that it's been opened up, we're starting to see just how ugly this process has become.
00:14:25.000 Yeah, and I assume it's like a lot of other things, sort of military industrial complex.
00:14:28.000 You get a budget.
00:14:29.000 If you don't spend the budget, you lose it next time.
00:14:31.000 So they don't care if the number is that high.
00:14:34.000 If it's gone, they have a budget that they can work with.
00:14:37.000 And to your point, everyone's taking their VIG a little bit off the top here and there before it gets there.
00:14:41.000 And who cares if we lose half a billion dollars or half a trillion dollars, I should say?
00:14:47.000 I know it's hard to believe, right?
00:14:49.000 You don't think about it.
00:14:49.000 I mean, think of if it's half a trillion dollars for a decade, you could pay down, you know, Man, you could pay down like 12, 13% of our national debt just in what's getting fraudulently pulled out of, and this, I guess, just Medicare.
00:15:04.000 I mean, that's crazy to me.
00:15:07.000 Yeah, it is crazy.
00:15:09.000 And I think, look, we debate about all these things what's the right policy?
00:15:14.000 What's the right thing to do?
00:15:15.000 But fraud is not popular.
00:15:17.000 You know, 99% of Americans, except for certain labor union leaders, don't want fraud.
00:15:22.000 And so I think this is a winning issue for Republicans and the Democrats.
00:15:27.000 Have not only excused the fraud, they've tried to cover it up, they've tried to dismantle all the enforcement.
00:15:33.000 And in California, they're doing stuff like just taking dictation from the labor unions and eliminating all controls on the system.
00:15:41.000 And in one case, California's largest fraud scheme is in home care services.
00:15:48.000 And California has changed the regulation to put it on the honor system so that you can harvest $10,000, $100,000, $1 million a year in this in home care program.
00:15:59.000 And the only guarantee that you have to give is to sign, yeah, I did the right thing.
00:16:03.000 I reported my hours.
00:16:05.000 I clocked in at the right X, Y, and Z.
00:16:08.000 And that's it.
00:16:08.000 We've essentially put everything on the honor system.
00:16:11.000 And the problem is that the country has been really invaded by all of these criminal forces and entities that see it just as a soft target.
00:16:21.000 So, obviously, this is happening everywhere, but it does seem to be more rampant, at least in terms of what we've been able to discover in sort of these blue state.
00:16:30.000 You know, run by Democrats.
00:16:31.000 Is this sort of like a USAID scheme where, hey, these people are kicking back to the politicians and that's what sort of keeps it off their radar?
00:16:38.000 And as long as they're getting, you know, they're a little bit of a, again, a VIG, we're just going to leave it alone.
00:16:44.000 Or is it not quite that nefarious?
00:16:46.000 I don't think it's quite that nefarious, but it doesn't have to be.
00:16:50.000 The system's actually designed so that you don't have to have illegal kickbacks or government payouts or, you know, criminal enterprises bribing politicians.
00:17:00.000 The Democrats in California have done something even more clever, which is, Just take that legitimate percentage off the top, whether it's good money or bad money.
00:17:09.000 It's never reported.
00:17:10.000 It's never investigated.
00:17:12.000 It's not even technically illegal for the unions to skim off the top.
00:17:16.000 And so they've created this system where they can maintain some plausible deniability.
00:17:21.000 They can maintain the requisite distance from these criminal enterprises while still hauling in cash.
00:17:27.000 And just to give people a sense of how much money this is, and you've run and worked on these enormous presidential campaigns, so you'll understand the scale here.
00:17:37.000 The California public sector unions representing these government workers, government healthcare workers included, are pulling in a billion dollars a year into their political war chest just for the state of California.
00:17:49.000 Yeah, just for everyone else's sake.
00:17:50.000 Like, you know, a presidential election costs about a billion dollars, like, you know, for our side.
00:17:56.000 That's what, if they're getting that every year in one state, I mean, you know, the order of magnitude of that is just, I mean, it's insane.
00:18:05.000 It's astronomical.
00:18:05.000 They don't have to do fundraising dinners.
00:18:07.000 They don't have to do fundraising tours.
00:18:09.000 They don't have to do any of those things that people who are trying to raise money for a political campaign have to do.
00:18:15.000 They just get a check, in a sense, directly from taxpayers that goes into their coffers, whether they do a good job or a bad job.
00:18:23.000 It doesn't matter.
00:18:24.000 And so, If you multiply that out, conservatives really have to figure out this problem, which is the Dems have set up a system where they can just scrape billions of dollars in government money into their coffers.
00:18:35.000 They have this war chest that's renewed perpetually, and Republicans are out there asking for people to make a $2 donation to whatever political campaign.
00:18:44.000 We have a massive asymmetry that we have to address, or every state in the United States will start looking like California.
00:18:51.000 So, how do you address that?
00:18:53.000 Because it's a state issue to an extent, but it's also federal taxpayer dollars.
00:19:00.000 How does the government or the federal government step in and put an end to this?
00:19:03.000 And honestly, no different than perhaps the Save America Act.
00:19:08.000 It's something that would be incredibly popular with the vast majority of the populace.
00:19:12.000 I'm sure it's an over 90% issue, just like the Save America Act is 83% across the board.
00:19:20.000 Is there a desire, or do the politicians just say, hey, again, the labor unions are taking care of us, or we're worried if you're the Democrat, if you go against this and try to actually stop it?
00:19:30.000 That their opponents will be very well funded by this same unions and ultimately backstopped by the American taxpayer.
00:19:39.000 Yeah, I think there's two ways to get at it there's a direct programmatic method and then a broader structural method.
00:19:45.000 The direct programmatic method is to just start enforcing the law relative to Medicaid and to put a cap on expenditures so that a state like California can't go from $100 billion to $200 billion, doubling Medicaid expenditures.
00:20:01.000 just in the single term of Governor Gavin Newsom.
00:20:04.000 So you have to cap costs.
00:20:06.000 You have to put tight controls on it. 0.97
00:20:08.000 You have to prohibit illegal aliens, for example, from using that Medicaid system as they're trying to do and subsidize in California.
00:20:16.000 But then ultimately, the big kind of structural change that needs to happen is that Republicans have to figure out a way through the courts, through state legislatures, through the federal government to outlaw public sector labor unions.
00:20:27.000 The old idea was that if you worked for the government, you didn't get necessarily the highest pay, but you had strong job protections.
00:20:33.000 You were doing a public service.
00:20:35.000 And that you weren't involved in lobbying because you can't have the government and the politicians and the unions lobbying in a circular manner.
00:20:43.000 We have to get back to that.
00:20:45.000 So tight restrictions on Medicaid growth, tight enforcement of anti fraud laws, and getting government unions out of the business of politics.
00:20:56.000 Yeah, I mean, I'm sure you'll tell me some differences, but it's really the same playbook as we saw in Minnesota, where anyone who asked about the Somali daycare fraud.
00:21:06.000 You know, you must be racist.
00:21:08.000 No, it's just like, I don't like people stealing taxpayer money.
00:21:12.000 I mean, the people exposing the fraud ultimately get attacked.
00:21:17.000 You know, what have you seen as it relates to that?
00:21:20.000 You've seen probably the stuff, they're passing laws to prevent journalists like yourself or Nick Shirley from even being able to talk about any of this.
00:21:30.000 It's wild.
00:21:30.000 I mean, it's very dystopian.
00:21:32.000 It certainly goes against the First Amendment and some of the basic freedoms of the press.
00:21:38.000 But it's actually happening.
00:21:39.000 They're doing it with a straight face.
00:21:41.000 I'm not sure exactly how they justify it, but I guess they don't really care.
00:21:44.000 You know, how do you deal with that?
00:21:47.000 Yeah, I mean, you have to keep pushing.
00:21:49.000 And right to your point, when we exposed this scheme in California with the $40 million, the Kardashian mansion, the man who was in charge of this business is married to another man.
00:22:03.000 And so when we reported out the story, a lawyer who said he was representing them accused us of homophobia.
00:22:10.000 It's like, wait a minute, this has nothing to do with homophobia.
00:22:13.000 What are we doing here?
00:22:14.000 This is like we're reporting on a story about this business and red flags for fraud.
00:22:19.000 So you just have to keep pushing.
00:22:21.000 Look, you can never let any of these things stop you.
00:22:23.000 And in Governor Gavin Newsom's case, we requested some documents related to certain policies in his administration.
00:22:32.000 And his lawyer sent us a letter saying, actually, no, the governor's communications, the governor's schedules, the governor's emails, the governor's deliberations are all exempt from public records requests for 50 years.
00:22:46.000 And so they're going to be closed longer than the USSR Soviet archives.
00:22:51.000 And so we have to keep fighting and we have to get people engaged with this because the alternative is very grim.
00:22:57.000 You have Democrats that have an extremely corrupt system that are scraping money off of your paycheck to pay their own political actors and foreign fraud gangs.
00:23:09.000 That is a very dark future.
00:23:11.000 And so it's like the SAVE Act.
00:23:13.000 It's like all of these critical pieces of legislation and public policy.
00:23:18.000 We have to get it done.
00:23:19.000 And it's going to get harder for conservatives in the future than it is now.
00:23:25.000 Unless we change some of these structural elements to level the playing field and get back to fair play.
00:23:31.000 Yeah.
00:23:32.000 You know, where else are you looking at this stuff?
00:23:36.000 And you mentioned Gavin Newsom.
00:23:38.000 You know, what other areas are they protecting over there in California?
00:23:42.000 And what do you think this does?
00:23:45.000 Again, they're going to limit the amount of exposure, certainly going into sort of the start of the next presidential cycle in a few weeks.
00:23:53.000 Again, it's a very unpopular issue if people figure out this is going on.
00:23:58.000 They're going to do whatever they can to protect it from ever coming out.
00:24:01.000 What do you think happens with all of that?
00:24:03.000 Will people finally get it?
00:24:05.000 The mainstream media is not going to report about it.
00:24:06.000 Guys like you and I will talk about it all the time.
00:24:10.000 Does it get out there enough to be able to do the damage that it should do to these people who have allowed this stuff andor perpetuated it?
00:24:17.000 Yeah, I think that it will.
00:24:18.000 And that especially will happen in this next presidential cycle when you're going to almost certainly have Gavin Newsom running.
00:24:24.000 You may also have Kamala Harris running again.
00:24:27.000 So there's going to be a focus on California.
00:24:29.000 And that's one of the reasons why I've been focused on.
00:24:32.000 Reporting about what's happening in the state.
00:24:34.000 And the other issue I think is really important is migration.
00:24:37.000 We reported exclusively that in his tenure as governor, Newsom spent more than a billion dollars in public funds facilitating the migrant invasion across the border in California.
00:24:50.000 And so he was providing everything from logistics, transportation, legal representation, welfare services, even free solar panels for illegal aliens.
00:25:01.000 I mean, it got so crazy that the California government was giving. 0.54
00:25:04.000 Free solar panels to illegal aliens. 1.00
00:25:07.000 I mean, it's like the it's so insane, but they were just flooding the state with these migrant populations. 1.00
00:25:14.000 And so, obviously, the border is sealed now, thank God. 1.00
00:25:19.000 But that issue is certainly not, you know, not resolved and it could reverse with the wrong president in office.
00:25:27.000 And so, I think we have to really just get a detailed record of what are these people doing.
00:25:32.000 Because, look, you know, someone like Newsom is very charismatic, he's a good speaker.
00:25:37.000 He can lie through his teeth without any feeling of remorse.
00:25:42.000 And so we have to nail them on what they've done because the actions should be indelible.
00:25:47.000 They should be, you know, front and center for voters to consider as we go into this next cycle.
00:25:53.000 So, Chris, you know, you went through the books on California's public sector unions 10 unions, over a billion dollars in dues in one year, 29 million spent on politics and lobbying, spending almost half a million dollars at luxury resorts.
00:26:09.000 And now they want more taxes on top of it.
00:26:12.000 Explain.
00:26:13.000 Maybe the feedback loop here because all of it really does defy any level of common sense.
00:26:22.000 Yeah, I mean, look, it's just the business logic.
00:26:25.000 So, a public sector union is in the business of expanding the public sector workforce and harvesting tax money from taxpayers.
00:26:35.000 And so, they want to have a bigger government, they want to have more taxes, they want to have greater dues as their numbers expand.
00:26:43.000 And so, their interest is just to expand government at all turns.
00:26:47.000 Look, in California, if you're in the professional class tax bracket, if you're a doctor or a lawyer or a small businessman, entrepreneur, you're likely spending a combined federal, state, and local tax rate of more than 53%.
00:27:02.000 And so we already have maxed out Scandinavian-style tax revenues, and they're still searching for more money to take.
00:27:09.000 And so what they propose now is a wealth tax, which is really an asset seizure tax, where anyone that has more than a billion dollars, whether it's liquid or whether it's in stocks or non-liquid investments, has to just give the government 5% of their net worth just off the top.
00:27:27.000 And so this is, we're starting to get into this dangerous territory.
00:27:31.000 And, you know, we scoured some of the documents from California legislative hearings, in particular their reparations task force. 0.51
00:27:39.000 And they're contemplating a South Africa-style seizure of land and wealth, targeting in particular white Californians, and then redistributing it in part along racial lines to so-called BIPOC, so black, indigenous, people of color.
00:27:55.000 And so it's starting to look very ugly.
00:27:57.000 And even though the wealth tax is targeted, at least in theory, towards tech elites, there is a real ideological agenda here.
00:28:06.000 And what they want to see ultimately is a South Africa-style truth and reconciliation committee stripping the wealthy of their assets and sending it into their own hands.
00:28:17.000 Yeah, and it's a shame because, you know, with that tax, that, you know, it's not like some of these guys are just sitting on, you know, billions of dollars, you know, in cash in their bank accounts.
00:28:25.000 I mean, these are people, you know, pushing the, you know, innovation in tech.
00:28:30.000 You know, they may have a multi billion dollar valuation on their company, but they may be living, you know, paycheck to paycheck.
00:28:35.000 You know, the value's there.
00:28:37.000 You strip out 5%, they got to pay tax.
00:28:39.000 They got to sell part of their company to pay the tax.
00:28:41.000 Like, think of what that does to innovation and growth.
00:28:44.000 Now, I imagine they all move to Texas and they just leave California and then you got a bigger void to fill and that's going to really.
00:28:50.000 Screw the people who do need some of these public services in California.
00:28:54.000 But it's almost like the people writing these laws either don't care or don't even have a basic understanding of the nuance and difference for when you're an entrepreneur trying to grow things.
00:29:06.000 Yeah, they don't know and they don't care.
00:29:08.000 I mean, they just have this sense of resentment against people who have been, by all accounts, enormously successful building companies, building technologies, now developing artificial intelligence.
00:29:21.000 And, you know, we saw it with Elon, where essentially legislators were just dumping on him for years and insulting him and attacking him and threatening him.
00:29:32.000 And you have to think, you know, look, if you're a billionaire, it's actually pretty easy to move.
00:29:37.000 You can buy a mansion in Miami.
00:29:38.000 You can buy a mansion across the border in Nevada.
00:29:41.000 You can go to Texas.
00:29:43.000 This is not the Dust Bowl.
00:29:45.000 You're not harnessing up your oxen and traveling across the plains.
00:29:49.000 You can charter a jet to get the hell out of town.
00:29:52.000 And in fact, one of my sources, a number of my sources, I was down in San Francisco talking to some people, and they said something around 70% of all California billionaires have either made an exit plan or will make an exit plan if this wealth tax passes.
00:30:06.000 So look, if you're the governor of Texas or Idaho or Or Wyoming or Florida, you have a golden opportunity to bring some of these innovators into your state because there will come a point where they say, This is not worth being in California.
00:30:22.000 We're out.
00:30:24.000 Yeah.
00:30:24.000 I mean, as we mentioned, there's the guy who clearly wants to be president, Gavin Newsom.
00:30:29.000 He claims transparency is a quote, legal and moral requirement.
00:30:35.000 But his office is, again, auto deletes emails after 90 days.
00:30:40.000 He vetoed a bipartisan bill that would have given citizens.
00:30:43.000 A way to appeal when records are denied.
00:30:46.000 And, you know, again, when you filed requests to his office, they admitted it had been documents that, you know, and basically refused to hand them over.
00:30:54.000 You know, what more is he hiding behind the obvious of what we've just discussed?
00:30:59.000 Yeah, well, there's a lot more.
00:31:01.000 I mean, we have some stories that are in the works that could be devastating if we're able to substantiate what's happening.
00:31:09.000 And look, Gavin Newsom has always had scandals all around him.
00:31:14.000 Since his time as mayor of San Francisco to his time climbing the ranks to governor of California.
00:31:20.000 And he's so far been able to outrun them.
00:31:23.000 But I think the scrutiny and the spotlight of a presidential campaign is unlike anything Gavin Newsom has ever experienced.
00:31:32.000 And I think a lot more information will start coming out about Gavin Newsom, about his public behavior, about some of the mafia like schemes that he's been running as governor.
00:31:45.000 And the public should be aware of what's happening because, again, the California model is the model for democratic governance writ large.
00:31:53.000 And really, what they want to do is they want to take California and then expand it to all 50 states.
00:31:58.000 And I think as we gear up for this 2028 presidential run, that's going to be the idea.
00:32:05.000 Is it the Texas and Florida model, or is it the New York and California model?
00:32:09.000 Voters will have to decide.
00:32:11.000 So, Chris, you are the guy that really shed a lot of the light on crazy things like critical.
00:32:18.000 Race theory and all of that nonsense.
00:32:21.000 How does this relate to that?
00:32:23.000 You put sort of critical race theory insanity on the map in 2020.
00:32:28.000 What's the scorecard in terms of tangible things that we've been able to root out after discovering what was going on?
00:32:34.000 I mean, is DEI actually dead inside these institutions or did it just change its name and we don't have it as an official policy, but everyone gets the wink, wink, nod, nod?
00:32:45.000 This is what we have to keep doing anyway.
00:32:47.000 And if it is hiding, where is it hiding?
00:32:50.000 Yeah, well, look, I mean, the second Trump administration has done heroic work to stamp out DEI in the federal government where it's basically gone, and then trying to stamp it out in every corporation, university, major school district around the country.
00:33:07.000 And someone like Harmeet Dillon, who's running the Civil Rights Division for the Department of Justice, I think she's a superstar.
00:33:14.000 She's done great work going after universities and Fortune 100 companies that are willfully violating the law as it relates to racial non-discrimination.
00:33:24.000 And so I think more progress has been made in the past two years than in the past 60 years since the affirmative action system was set up.
00:33:34.000 However, there are some organizations like tech companies have actually done a good job just eliminating many DEI programs.
00:33:42.000 They're fast, they're nimble, they're not ideologically committed in the same way that you have, for example, a university might be ideologically committed.
00:33:50.000 And so I think a lot of work has been done, but more work needs to be done because those organizations that are really fanatics about DEI, about anti-white discrimination, about punishing certain groups based on their race, their sex.
00:34:08.000 Rewarding others based on the same.
00:34:10.000 They're still doing it.
00:34:11.000 They've gone under the radar.
00:34:12.000 They've changed the names of their departments.
00:34:14.000 They've switched up their job descriptions.
00:34:17.000 But a lot of that kind of seething hatred and discrimination is still driving the apparatus.
00:34:24.000 And so I think, look, there's no permanent victories, there's no permanent defeats.
00:34:31.000 So I think that right now we have good momentum, have to take it much further.
00:34:36.000 So, Chris, what do you think the left's actual You know, operating ideology is in 2026, now that maybe you know the woke label is toxic, at least to an extent, probably not to them, but I think they realize it doesn't really play to the masses.
00:34:53.000 And how does our side fight an enemy, you know, that basically just keeps changing the costumes, just like you know, all these protesters just change the t shirt, even if they don't really know why they're there?
00:35:03.000 Yeah, yeah, it's like a revolving protest.
00:35:07.000 Hey, what are we doing?
00:35:07.000 What are we protesting today?
00:35:09.000 It certainly is that.
00:35:09.000 And so, here's what I think is happening.
00:35:12.000 And look, our opponents are not stupid people. 0.99
00:35:15.000 They're not good people, but they're not stupid people. 0.99
00:35:18.000 And so I think what they're really trying to do is shift from culture to economics. 0.99
00:35:22.000 So during the BLM era, it was always about race. 0.85
00:35:25.000 It was always about transgenderism. 0.77
00:35:27.000 It's always about cultural issues.
00:35:29.000 Now they're saying they're identifying a pain point that Americans are feeling.
00:35:34.000 They don't like the cost of housing, the cost of health care, the cost of groceries, the cost of gas.
00:35:39.000 And so they're trying to take that economic anxiety, adding to it the anxiety about AI and data centers.
00:35:46.000 Flock cameras, whatever have you.
00:35:48.000 And they're trying to make an economic pitch to voters to say that we'll essentially give you what you need for free.
00:35:55.000 And the big bad Republicans and billionaires and technologists are trying to take it away from you.
00:36:01.000 It's not an honest argument, but I think what they're doing is trying to, again, shift to economics.
00:36:07.000 And the right has to respond in kind.
00:36:10.000 We have to have not only a kind of counterattack, certainly fraud, the fraud narrative and fraud reporting is a great counterattack.
00:36:17.000 Yeah, because if you think it's bad now, just wait till they actually get power and they jack up everyone's taxes.
00:36:22.000 And, you know, they may give you the bare minimum, but, man, you have no chance of digging out of that hole.
00:36:28.000 Yeah, and we have to do a good job at re educating people about socialism.
00:36:33.000 I mean, this was a debate, you know, that went on for the entirety of the Cold War.
00:36:37.000 I think a lot of Americans have kind of forgotten the lessons about how socialist economics turns out in the real world.
00:36:45.000 And so we have.
00:36:46.000 No, no, no, but they've never tried real communism, Chris.
00:36:48.000 They've never tried it real.
00:36:49.000 I mean, it's failed everywhere it's ever been.
00:36:52.000 But this time it'll be different.
00:36:54.000 Yeah, this time it will be different.
00:36:55.000 No, that's what they always say.
00:36:57.000 And yet it turns out worse and worse every time.
00:36:59.000 But look, I think we have a really good symbol that has come to the fore in the last six months.
00:37:06.000 Zorhan Mamdani, the current governor of New York, has opened these government run grocery stores.
00:37:13.000 And so they're trying to open five of these grocery stores.
00:37:15.000 I think that is a good story.
00:37:17.000 We have to dig into it.
00:37:18.000 We have to analyze it.
00:37:19.000 We have to request these documents.
00:37:22.000 Related to their operations.
00:37:24.000 I can guarantee you, for a very average government run grocery store, they will be far more expensive than the highest end Whole Foods ever created by a factor of 100.
00:37:35.000 And the kickback schemes for all the people who are building them for them.
00:37:39.000 I mean, it's going to be a disaster.
00:37:41.000 I just, yeah, I hope it's a disaster soon so we can figure it out, shed some light on it, and put an end to it before it becomes worse.
00:37:48.000 That's right.
00:37:48.000 You have to show why it doesn't work.
00:37:51.000 And we have to illustrate that with good arguments.
00:37:53.000 And so.
00:37:55.000 I think that's it. 0.63
00:37:55.000 And the other thing I would also say on top of that is they're shifting to an ideology called third worldism, which is this idea that the true conflict between the oppressor and the oppressed is between the white colonialist imperialist class and then the kind of brown and black third world oppressed class that needs to rise up to overthrow their oppressors. 0.63
00:38:21.000 And so it's slightly different than critical race theory, which was really rooted in the history of.
00:38:26.000 American slavery and white black relations.
00:38:30.000 And so you've seen the aperture widen. 0.61
00:38:32.000 And the reason why you're seeing such interest in someone like Mom Dhani, someone like El Said in Michigan, is because they represent this new third worldist ideology and third worldist identity that can kind of shift away from that tired and destroyed and discredited BLM narrative and try to present itself as something new. 0.53
00:38:53.000 Yeah, except it feels like everywhere else where they've tried importing the third world, you end up being. 0.71
00:38:58.000 Being or becoming the third world. 1.00
00:38:59.000 So I don't know why anyone would actually want that, but I guess I don't know why they'd want any of these things, and yet they keep trying. 1.00
00:39:06.000 Yeah, that's right.
00:39:07.000 You know, I've traveled a lot in the third world over the last, you know, 25 years.
00:39:13.000 And look, there's some beautiful places and beautiful historical sites and many virtues of these places.
00:39:22.000 But I think most Americans don't really understand that all cultures are not the same.
00:39:28.000 And in fact, some cultures are more compatible with ours than others.
00:39:31.000 Some cultures have produced more productive and capable citizens than others. 0.98
00:39:38.000 And so we have to be very careful in figuring out who we want to allow entry into our country. 0.99
00:39:46.000 And we have to be very realistic about what it's like in third world countries like Haiti, like parts of Sub Saharan Africa, parts of Central America, even.
00:39:58.000 And I think Americans have this kind of romantic notion that.
00:40:03.000 Humans are essentially stamped from birth as equal in every way, in every capacity, in every part of cultural imagination.
00:40:14.000 That's just not how it is.
00:40:16.000 And I think we're starting to see some adverse consequences.
00:40:20.000 Without question, I mean, I've seen people sort of refer to it.
00:40:23.000 I sort of like the line of suicidal empathy.
00:40:25.000 We want to be so nice, but we'll do that at the destruction of our own society, at the expense of our own children, their safety, their well being.
00:40:34.000 And it's truly scary.
00:40:35.000 And if we look at other places who've had the same sort of suicidal empath, namely much of Europe and the way that they've sort of opened up their migratory corridors to places that, let's just say, yeah, all cultures aren't created equal, it's not worked out well for anyone thus far.
00:40:52.000 And the notion that, like communism, well, it'll work over here, it'll just be different.
00:40:58.000 Then you see rape statistics go through the roof, crime statistics go through the roof, the amount of people fully dependent on government aid and welfare in perpetuity.
00:41:07.000 You know, it's scary, but I guess for Democrats and the people who are encouraging these kind of policies, it's like, well, listen, if they're fully dependent, they're going to vote Democrat because that's all we have to offer.
00:41:17.000 Yeah, that's right.
00:41:18.000 And your point about suicidal empathy reminds me of a story that we reported a couple of months ago in California.
00:41:25.000 And the Newsom administration had given a grant to a nonprofit that specialized in bringing undocumented migrants with AIDS across the border from Mexico into the United States.
00:41:36.000 What could go wrong, Chris?
00:41:38.000 What could go wrong?
00:41:39.000 I mean, think about it.
00:41:40.000 It's like a South Park episode, though.
00:41:41.000 Like, how is it?
00:41:43.000 Yes, those are the people we definitely want in our country.
00:41:46.000 We need that.
00:41:47.000 I can't, I see no downside whatsoever.
00:41:49.000 Yeah.
00:41:50.000 And you look at the documents and you're like, wait a minute.
00:41:52.000 No, this can't actually mean what it looks like it means.
00:41:56.000 And then you read all the reports, you read the grant write-ups, you read the interviews with the organizers of these NGOs, and you realize, actually, yes, the left is so committed to this victim ideology that they want to bring in undocumented migrants with AIDS and provide them with wraparound services, tens, if not hundreds of thousands of dollars in benefits.
00:42:20.000 And you have to say this is not practical, this is not prudence, this is not any kind of calculation, except that it serves a deep ideological need.
00:42:29.000 And I think conservatives on our side make a mistake, assuming that everyone's thinking on politics operates on a shared or common sense of how the world should be and how practical, in a practical sense, we should approach these issues.
00:42:45.000 You have to realize, no, a lot of these people are totally out of their minds.
00:42:49.000 They're totally deranged by ideology.
00:42:52.000 And you have to really understand where they're coming from to understand what they're doing.
00:42:57.000 It's not quite easy all the time.
00:42:59.000 So I'm curious about sort of the broader downstream cultural impacts and how it affects our institutions.
00:43:06.000 For example, look at the Lindsey Clancy case.
00:43:09.000 I mean, you've spent years writing about a culture where every act gets a diagnosis and a personal responsibility just totally goes out the window.
00:43:19.000 Accountability is gone.
00:43:21.000 Is that what we're just seeing?
00:43:22.000 Because it's wild.
00:43:24.000 I've been traveling for the last.
00:43:25.000 You know, 10 days since the Clancy verdict, but it's like, wow, you know, I figured there were one or two people that were just insane and saying, hey, you know, okay.
00:43:33.000 But you see a lot of people out there.
00:43:36.000 It's like, no, no, no.
00:43:37.000 Like, of course, like a mother can just slaughter her children because her hormones were a little bit off.
00:43:41.000 I was like, I have a feeling if I got on TRT right now and I murdered my children or if I murdered anyone or if I did anything, I'd be in jail forever.
00:43:50.000 And they just want someone to walk free.
00:43:52.000 I mean, what's happening?
00:43:55.000 Yeah, I've been thinking a lot about this and, and, Here's what I think is happening.
00:44:00.000 We've had decades and decades of abortion on demand in the United States.
00:44:05.000 Democrats in places like Virginia and California have either proposed or enacted abortion up to 40 weeks, essentially up to the moment of birth.
00:44:16.000 And this is that logic taken to its conclusion.
00:44:20.000 If it's okay to murder your child at 40 weeks as the child is exiting the womb, Maybe it's also okay to murder the child if that child is causing you the same kind of discomfort or encroaching on your lifestyle when that child is three or four or seven.
00:44:39.000 Yeah, well, there was a professor at Princeton, I believe, that wrote a paper that basically said you should be able to murder your kids up to the age of six or seven.
00:44:44.000 Just, just.
00:44:47.000 I mean, I mean, that's at Princeton.
00:44:48.000 Like, this isn't, you know, I mean, I guess it's a radical place in terms of all of academia is fairly radical, but like, you know, this is a top institution in the world.
00:44:55.000 And yet you have someone that not only can have the thought, But, like, actually write it down.
00:45:01.000 Like, they're not even hiding it.
00:45:03.000 Like, okay, maybe I agree with that, but maybe I'm not dumb enough to actually put it on paper, but they're doing it.
00:45:09.000 Yeah, they're doing it. 0.66
00:45:10.000 And so I think it's that logic.
00:45:11.000 And I think this kind of fantasy world that these women are inhabiting on social media, the women who are showing up to kind of cheer for Lindsey Clancy as she's coming to the courthouse, look, it's something very dark.
00:45:24.000 And, you know, as far back as Greek and Roman myths, you have these characters, these women in these mythologies where they kill their own children, you know, infanticide.
00:45:33.000 It's a brutal, horrific, primal experience that is, it kind of touches something deep in our subconscious.
00:45:41.000 And I think what's different is that that.
00:45:44.000 Classical audience would recoil in horror because it was such a moral transgression.
00:45:49.000 And now we have people who are addled on social media that are actually celebrating it openly, rationalizing it, making excuses for it.
00:45:58.000 And so I think we've reached a cultural point where things have degraded to such an extent that we have people celebrating the worst transgressions.
00:46:09.000 And that I think is actually new.
00:46:11.000 This is something that's new in our era of.
00:46:14.000 Mass medicalization, mass abortion, mass feminism, and mass social media saturation.
00:46:23.000 Yeah, well, I mean, it seems like, I mean, kudos to them. 0.99
00:46:27.000 It's nuts, but it seems like the feminists have actually more than achieved their goal.
00:46:31.000 I guess the stated purpose originally was sort of equality, but it's sort of like the trans movement.
00:46:38.000 They didn't actually want equality with the gay movement, they wanted equality plus.
00:46:42.000 Now the feminists accounted for what? 1.00
00:46:45.000 90%? 1.00
00:46:46.000 9% of the new jobs this time around women got that. 0.82
00:46:49.000 They make up the majority of academia and college applicants. 1.00
00:46:54.000 And now they seemingly got the permission to murder their children, three, five, or eight months old, it doesn't matter when.
00:47:08.000 They're far more than equal at this point. 1.00
00:47:11.000 Yeah, I think that's why these ideas are merged in this story because, look, feminism wanted to. 1.00
00:47:18.000 To make a promise to American women that you can have it all. 1.00
00:47:21.000 You can have the big career, you can have the big family, you can have the big success in all these other domains. 0.58
00:47:27.000 But the biggest impediment to that is, of course, young children.
00:47:31.000 Young children are very demanding, they require a lot of time, attention, care.
00:47:35.000 They make a lot of exceptions.
00:47:36.000 They're sick, they have to do this, they have to do that. 0.99
00:47:39.000 And so I think what was always latent within the feminist ideology was that children were an impediment to the feminist promise. 1.00
00:47:49.000 A lot of the original feminists didn't have children. 1.00
00:47:52.000 That was their way to have it all. 1.00
00:47:56.000 But we've kind of raised Americans on now multiple generations of this.
00:48:01.000 And so you're promised all. 0.97
00:48:05.000 The children become an impediment.
00:48:07.000 And then the children become expendable.
00:48:09.000 And so we're taking all of these cultural threads that have been insinuating themselves in our society for many decades.
00:48:17.000 And they all kind of are woven together in a very Tight way with this Lindsey Clancy story.
00:48:23.000 And look, I think this is why she's sparked sympathy.
00:48:28.000 But I think a lot of it is denial because a lot of the women that were marching for her or whatnot, you know, they blame the husband, you know, even though Clancy admitted to doing it.
00:48:37.000 They're like, no, you sent him out like with a purpose.
00:48:39.000 I mean, you know, that's why it doesn't seem like, you know, this was a moment of passion and insanity.
00:48:44.000 It's like, no, no, no.
00:48:45.000 You sent your husband on an errand.
00:48:46.000 You knew how long it would take.
00:48:47.000 You checked in on him to make sure he wasn't coming back to be able to stop this.
00:48:52.000 Like, I don't know.
00:48:54.000 It seems like all of those arguments sort of go out the window.
00:48:58.000 They do.
00:48:58.000 And the story, I tried to avoid it as long as I could because it's really brutal.
00:49:03.000 I mean, it's very hard to imagine.
00:49:05.000 It's very hard to kind of visualize or picture what it would take to do what she did.
00:49:11.000 And so I think, you know, we have to take this opportunity to talk about why this is the case.
00:49:16.000 What does this emerge from?
00:49:17.000 And then conservatives, I think, have to also, you know, more broadly, politically and sociologically, we have to explain to people that life is about trade offs.
00:49:27.000 No matter how rich you are, no matter how, you know, intelligent or less, it's like no matter how privileged you are in life.
00:49:36.000 There's always trade offs. 0.92
00:49:38.000 And especially for women, those trade offs involve family. 0.97
00:49:42.000 This is just part of human nature.
00:49:44.000 It's part of how things have always been and part of things how they always will be.
00:49:48.000 And so we have to get smart in how we communicate this to tell young women, hey, yes, you have more opportunities than ever.
00:49:56.000 And you should have the freedom to pursue whatever kind of life you want.
00:50:00.000 But be mindful about these trade offs and select wisely so that you're not disappointed later.
00:50:06.000 Yeah.
00:50:07.000 Well, I mean, I'd also say, If it was the husband that killed the kids, he'd be in jail or on death row.
00:50:15.000 Same circumstances, same family.
00:50:17.000 It wouldn't even be close. 1.00
00:50:19.000 There is a double standard that seems to give these women a lot less accountability that if it was you or me or anyone else that wasn't female would face. 1.00
00:50:34.000 Yeah, of course. 0.99
00:50:37.000 And that's how it should be.
00:50:38.000 I think actually.
00:50:41.000 I think the double standard is interesting because, in some ways, you want to have equal standards depending on whatever.
00:50:48.000 But I even feel that, though.
00:50:51.000 I even feel a certain difference.
00:50:53.000 If a man, you have news stories where a man kills his kids or a murder suicide, and you feel horror, you feel shock, you feel anger, you want vengeance.
00:51:06.000 I think in the Clancy case, at least as I react to it, it's a slightly different thing.
00:51:11.000 It's a mother who, obviously, you know, Had some kind of brutal psychological possession, you know, psychological problem, psychological crisis.
00:51:24.000 And you feel some sympathy for her.
00:51:27.000 But then beyond that sympathy, you have to say, yes, I feel sympathy for you that you had obviously this torment that led to this action.
00:51:35.000 But the action itself should be treated totally equally.
00:51:38.000 Yeah.
00:51:39.000 And so you don't get an excuse because you took the medications or that you had postpartum depression.
00:51:45.000 Look, you can feel human sympathy.
00:51:48.000 But justice has to come with kind of extreme equality, extreme certainty.
00:51:54.000 And the action that you undertook is not excused by any of these things.
00:51:59.000 And so I think she should be punished to the fullest. 0.90
00:52:01.000 I mean, again, we have myths about mothers killing their children because that is the ultimate transgression, feminine transgression. 0.99
00:52:11.000 And as a society, we can't tolerate it. 0.95
00:52:14.000 We have to maintain that prohibition.
00:52:17.000 So, Chris, you've written about how the right can win back cities and win back.
00:52:21.000 The culture and win more elections.
00:52:23.000 Obviously, we've got midterms coming up.
00:52:26.000 We've got the fraud stories.
00:52:27.000 We've got the universities.
00:52:28.000 If you had to pick one fight for conservatives to go all in on between now and November, what is it and what's most effective?
00:52:39.000 Yeah, I mean, I think you've got to counter some of these left wing narratives that are coming down the pipe.
00:52:45.000 And then I think, look, I think the administration, conservatives more broadly, need to also make a The case for all of the good things that have happened as the result of the first two years of this administration.
00:52:58.000 There was a study that came out recently that almost 3 million undocumented have returned to their country of origin in the last two years.
00:53:07.000 So you have an immigration picture that is, I think, very favorable.
00:53:12.000 It's showing that there's progress being made.
00:53:14.000 You have rents declining in certain key cities as the population shifts and new housing is being built.
00:53:23.000 You have a booming economy with great jobs numbers, a lot of investment, and blue collar employees, blue collar workers.
00:53:32.000 Having the best wage gains of any group in the economy.
00:53:36.000 And so there's a lot of good news, and I'm afraid that a lot of it isn't quite punching through to voters who still feel some anxiety about prices, about inflation, about housing and healthcare.
00:53:48.000 And I think if the debate is going to be about those issues, we have better answers, but we have to make better arguments.
00:53:57.000 And that's something that I think can happen in this cycle, certainly in the next cycle, it's still going to be a live issue.
00:54:04.000 I agree.
00:54:05.000 Chris, where can people go to find your work and see what you're talking about?
00:54:08.000 Because I think this is the kind of thing people really have to be all over.
00:54:11.000 They have to be spreading it so that people really see what's going on.
00:54:14.000 Because I know, like me, mainstream media is never going to give this the coverage that it deserves.
00:54:19.000 Even if people want to hear about it, they're going to do their best to sweep it under the rug.
00:54:23.000 Yeah, you have to get involved.
00:54:25.000 And social media is the best place.
00:54:26.000 I'm Christopher Ruffo on X and ChristopherRuffo.com on Substack.
00:54:31.000 So those are both great places.
00:54:33.000 And I think you're right.
00:54:34.000 Look, the playing field, though, is.
00:54:37.000 Is more fair than it has ever been.
00:54:39.000 And the fact that people are now getting a majority of their news through social media, of course, has some problems.
00:54:43.000 It's not all good information that circulates, but it's an advantage for us because we don't have to rely on those old gatekeepers.
00:54:51.000 And so shows like yours, a Substack like mine, all these are great sources of information to people to turn to.
00:54:58.000 Awesome.
00:54:58.000 Well, really appreciate it, man.
00:54:59.000 Guys, check him out.
00:55:00.000 And Chris, thanks a lot.
00:55:02.000 I'm sure as this progresses and your investigations continue, we'll definitely have to talk more about it.
00:55:07.000 Hey, good to see you again.
00:55:08.000 You too.
00:55:09.000 Be well.
00:55:10.000 Guys, thank you so much for tuning in.
00:55:13.000 Again, make sure you are liking, sharing, subscribing.
00:55:15.000 Just hit that little like button right now.
00:55:17.000 It takes exactly zero time.
00:55:18.000 Hit the like button.
00:55:19.000 Share this with 10, 15, 20, 200, 5,000 of your friends.
00:55:23.000 Subscribe so you never miss one of these major episodes.
00:55:26.000 Check out our great sponsors down below and in the video description.
00:55:29.000 Okay.
00:55:29.000 It's not easy to support a show like this.
00:55:31.000 If you have a need for a product and you're comparing between two, maybe the guys that, I don't know, support this show are people who share your values.
00:55:38.000 So check them out.
00:55:40.000 Support them.
00:55:42.000 Something we got to do.
00:55:44.000 If you missed the show here on Rumble, if you have friends get their podcasts a different way, check us out on iTunes, Spotify Podcasts.
00:55:52.000 You know the drill.
00:55:53.000 Like, share, subscribe, check us out the sponsors.
00:55:57.000 Stay strong, stay informed, stay engaged, and you know, always stay just a little bit triggered.
00:56:02.000 Thanks a lot, guys.
00:56:03.000 I'll talk to you soon.