The January 6th Committee is totally imploding. It s credibility is like it got shot in the face by Liz Cheney s dad on a quail hunt. The sham committee is allowing perjury and false evidence to be internationally broadcast in an attempt to smear Trump so that he doesn t run again. The witnesses are about as credible as Amber Heard and Jussie Smollett, and these are their star witnesses. They re doing it again and again, and today we get to find out which news outlets and journalists are actually frauds, and which ones will actually correct themselves. Or will they just run with the story and pretend like it never happened, or just ignore the new evidence that popped 6 days, 6 hours, 6 minutes later? And when the truth actually comes out, will they run with it or ignore the truth? Or just ignore it and let the story go out there and run with that narrative? And the media is salivating at the idea that Trump may have actually gone to the Capitol to meet with the President. And we find out about it months later, after they ve weaponized it and weaponized the story to make it seem like it s all a big hoax! What's the deal with the Jason Bourne story? and the J.O.V.E.A.R.T. hoax? What are the chances of it actually being a hoax, and if it s a big one, what are they going to do about it? or if it's a big enough to be proven to be a hoax or not? And what will they will they'll even care about it or not just a hoax and will they care about the truth or just let it go to the public to investigate it or will they let the truth go out to the world they'll just let the rest of us know that it's all a hoax? What do they do it? What are they do with it? And will they even care or they just let us know they're going to correct themselves or just keep running with it and not even bother to look at the evidence or they won't even consider the truth, or do anything at all? What's their interest in the truth about it or are they just go with it ? what do they really care about that? What s the difference between the truth and the lies they ve got to do with the truth anyway? What kind of evidence they have to do?
00:00:00.000Hey guys, the January 6th committee's credibility is totally imploding.
00:00:05.000It's like it got shot in the face by Liz Cheney's dad on a quail hunt.
00:00:10.000Apparently, beyond the already now disproven.
00:00:14.000Again, conspiracy theory to truth used to be six months, now it's about six hours.
00:00:18.000Trump didn't actually pull a Jason Bourne and subdue multiple young, heavily armed Secret Service agents and take over the beast to go to the Capitol building.
00:00:31.000But apparently, the note that the Star Witness claimed was her note that she was talking about yesterday.
00:00:39.000When I say Star Witness, let's use some air quotes.
00:00:44.000The star witness apparently lied about that too because Eric Hirschman, a Trump attorney who already testified about that note, says it's his handwriting.
00:00:59.000Cheney displayed the note yesterday that Cassidy Hutchinson claimed to have written, except White House lawyer Eric Hurstman already told the committee that he wrote the note in question.
00:01:11.000They knew that because he testified to that.
00:01:17.000He testified about this, whether it's weeks or even perhaps now months ago.
00:01:23.000So they knowingly let the witness say these things.
00:01:28.000The sham committee is allowing perjury and false evidence to be internationally broadcast in an attempt to smear Trump.
00:01:46.000They knew that someone else wrote the note.
00:01:49.000They allowed her to say that it was her.
00:01:52.000They're going to do nothing about the perjury, just like they won't hear from the witnesses that are willing to step forth from secret service.
00:01:59.000No interest. We'll let that narrative go out there.
00:02:10.000They'll pretend like it's real, like they still do with Russia, Russia, Russia, because there'll be people that won't even bother to try to educate themselves.
00:02:20.000They're going with the, well, it's not a formal trial from the committee, right?
00:02:23.000We don't actually have to observe rules of evidence that ensure a fair process validated by centuries of Anglo-American tradition and the rule of law.
00:02:34.000That's what the committee's coming back with right now.
00:02:36.000Yeah, we don't have to really follow the evidence because it's not like official, official trial.
00:02:44.000A long list of witch hunt trials, right?
00:02:48.000Liz Cheney is turning out to be about as competent as Jerry Nadler was during impeachment hoax number two.
00:02:55.000The witnesses are about as credible as Amber Heard and Jussie Smollett, and these are their star witnesses.
00:03:03.000They're doing it again and again, and today we get to find out which news entities and journalists are actually frauds, which ones will actually correct themselves, or will they just run with it and pretend like it never happened, or just ignore the new evidence that popped six days, six hours, six minutes later, right?
00:03:22.000They run with the story, pretend like the corollary to the story, when the truth actually comes out, Crickets.
00:03:30.000So did Cassidy Hutchinson, did she tell the truth about anything?
00:03:33.000I get they got what they wanted in terms of soundbites, but you have Secret Service that certainly won't corroborate and will actually say exactly the opposite about the Jason Bourne, Trump as James Bond stealing a Secret Service car.
00:03:47.000You have the note that they knew about and heard about that was the other big bombshell.