Triggered - Donald Trump Jr - June 24, 2022


SICK: AOC Refuses to Condemn Violence Against Pro-Lifers!


Episode Stats

Length

3 minutes

Words per Minute

138.17308

Word Count

479

Sentence Count

39

Misogynist Sentences

1


Summary

A reporter tries to get Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-cortez to condemn the pro-abortion violence proposed by pro-choice groups, and she won't even acknowledge it. Is she condoning the violence? Or is she just ignoring the question? What's the difference between her and the rest of the Democratic Party on this one? Is she a sheep farmer? Or are we supposed to be offended by the violence being proposed by Pro-abortion groups? Or does she just not get the point of view of the people on the left on this whole pro-life movement? Or is there some sort of double standard that only applies to the far-left and only to the extreme right? What do you think? Do you think AOC should have been more forceful in her condemnation of the violence, or is there a double standard to be found in her response to a reporter's question, and AOC just ignores the question and doesn't even respond to it? or does she not even get the chance to say a word on the matter at all? I'll tell you what's going to happen, folks, and it's not going to be crickets. Watch for crickets, folks. Watch for yourself. I have a feeling we're going to see crickets and crickets! and you'll see the crickets... in the future, folks! I'm not sure if crickets will be a thing at all, but crickets is what we need to be worried about. (sounds like crickets at all. . . . I know what crickets are going to do, right?? (I know, I know, right? I know I know they will be, but I know that they are, right?!) Let me know what you think about it, and I'll let you know if you think it's crickets or not crickets? (and I'll talk about it in the comments section below! ) - Tom and I will talk about the double standard and why it's a problem, right or not? - Thank you for listening to this episode of the podcast. - Timestamps: 1:00:00 - Is it a problem? 2:30 - Is AOC's response? 3:15 - Will she condemn the violence proposed? 4:00 5:40 - Is she going to condemn it?


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Wow, guys, incredible news today out of the Supreme Court, a big win.
00:00:05.000 And as we've seen ever since the leak, there's been a lot of pro-abortion groups talking about violence, insinuating violence, seemingly in some cases, to me, encouraging violence.
00:00:21.000 And now you have a reporter that spent almost two minutes trying to get AOC, To condemn any violence.
00:00:30.000 You already saw the fire bombings.
00:00:32.000 You saw it. So this is a real thing.
00:00:33.000 And she spends two minutes.
00:00:35.000 She'll talk to everyone. She won't answer the question.
00:00:40.000 Will you condemn the violence proposed by pro-abortion groups?
00:00:45.000 Will she not condemn it?
00:00:48.000 Are you not condemning the violence proposed by pro-abortion groups?
00:00:54.000 So I guess no condemnation.
00:00:57.000 Can you not touch me please?
00:01:03.000 I'm a sheep farmer. I'm a sheep farmer.
00:01:25.000 Congresswoman. Congresswoman. Congresswoman.
00:01:28.000 Congresswoman, will you condemn the violence proposed by pro-abortion groups?
00:01:33.000 Will you condemn the violence?
00:01:34.000 Senator Manchin said he's deeply disappointed by this decision, and he said he would support legislation to cut it by road, but he did not say anything about the filibuster.
00:01:42.000 What's your message to him? Not supporting changes to the filibuster is not supporting filibuster.
00:01:51.000 Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez, we're taking your response to mean that you do not condemn the violence proposed by Corvorsion Group.
00:01:57.000 Are you concerned about state rights and country protection?
00:02:01.000 Yes, I absolutely am concerned about that.
00:02:03.000 Even in Texas, I think anti-slavery laws were overturned on the basis of the right to privacy established by Congress.
00:02:11.000 Are you concerned about the pro-abortion violence proposed?
00:02:14.000 We are overturning the right to privacy established by Roe.
00:02:17.000 And that will have knock-on effects for people even regardless of their views on abortion.
00:02:23.000 They will wake up with less rights and they don't know it yet.
00:02:26.000 Will you condemn the violence proposed by pro-abortion groups?
00:02:31.000 If you're on the left, you get to not answer the question, and it's not a tacit acceptance.
00:02:36.000 It's not condoning the violence, even if you ignore a question from a reporter for two minutes while talking to other reporters.
00:02:42.000 That's not a problem.
00:02:44.000 I have a feeling, based on actual experience, watching it over and over and over again, if you're a Republican and you don't assertively Ad nauseam.
00:02:56.000 How many times did my father have to condone the nonsense they asked him to condone?
00:03:00.000 Okay, he condoned it. He did. You must do it again and again and again.
00:03:05.000 Whatever it was, it didn't even matter.
00:03:07.000 Okay? Many of the things deserve to be condoned, and he did.
00:03:10.000 But if he didn't do it with every sentence, it was a problem.
00:03:12.000 Here, I have a feeling we're going to see crickets, folks.
00:03:16.000 Watch for yourself. Watch for yourself, and you'll see...
00:03:20.000 The double standard. Liberal privilege still exists even if Roe v.
00:03:26.000 Wade and abortion got kicked back to the states.