Western Standard - October 04, 2026


HANNAFORD: AI is getting smarter fast. Should that scare us?

Hosted by
Mentioned
Hamilton MP says HUNDREDS will be laid off before Christmas

Episode Stats


Length

26 minutes

Words per minute

155.27

Word count

4,077

Sentence count

79

Harmful content

Toxicity

6

sentences flagged

Hate speech

2

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 Good evening, Western Standard viewers, and welcome to Hannaford, a weekly politics show
00:00:20.740 of the Western Standard. It is Thursday, October the 1st. With me today is one of our star reporters
00:00:27.360 in the Western Standard newsroom in Calgary,
00:00:30.900 Lea Moshe, and Lea, I've noticed,
00:00:34.140 likes to get deep into subjects that really interest me.
00:00:37.780 And one of them is the future,
00:00:39.980 the present and future of artificial intelligence.
00:00:43.720 I think most of us now have tried out things like ROC,
00:00:49.100 chat GPT, see what they can do.
00:00:53.040 And Lea, however, has been following
00:00:55.700 what the medical profession is able to do with, was it Grok or ChatGPT that they used?
00:01:05.360 They actually just used a chip that ChatGPT uses, so it's their own AI.
00:01:10.080 It's their own proprietary brand, okay.
00:01:12.880 Well, Leah, what have they done?
00:01:15.240 You sounded very enthusiastic.
00:01:17.780 Okay, well, one of the things they have done is used surgical robots,
00:01:22.120 So they're called Da Vinci Surgical Robots, and they've actually programmed an AI into the robots.
00:01:29.180 And the robots watch surgical procedures.
00:01:32.660 Specifically, they did a gallbladder procedure, so they were looking at that footage.
00:01:37.520 They learned from the footage and was able to execute the actual gallbladder surgery successfully on pig cadavers.
00:01:45.520 How many times did they do that to make sure they understood it properly?
00:01:49.280 How many times?
00:01:50.180 Um, the article didn't say, but I just know that they said it was a hundred percent success rate.
00:01:57.640 So pretty good. 0.99
00:01:58.860 So you're a dead pig and you work on the gallbladder. 0.98
00:02:04.880 Um, I would have to assume that they choose their surgeons carefully because as I understand how AI works, 0.99
00:02:16.080 it does not think it observes. And then having gathered sufficient observations can then
00:02:25.100 replicate the sort of the average of the observations it's seen. So, I mean, this
00:02:30.340 actually is a case of garbage in, garbage out. If they have done that kind of an operation on the
00:02:36.640 body of a pig. I have to assume that they found good people to do it and copied
00:02:44.200 them, and the less capable ones were a part of the experiment. So far so good?
00:02:51.760 Yes, that's definitely what they did, not the ones that failed, no.
00:02:55.600 All right, yes, okay. Right, well look, if they can do that on a pig, what stops them
00:03:01.600 doing complicated medical procedures on human beings.
00:03:08.420 Well...
00:03:09.260 I take it, by the way, that there's a sort of a scalpel on the end of an arm
00:03:16.260 and it's guided by the computer, which is informed by the AI.
00:03:20.420 Is that how things work?
00:03:21.380 Yes, yes.
00:03:21.920 They have, like, arms and they use the instruments themselves
00:03:25.140 because, like, the doctors were not helping them whatsoever in the procedure.
00:03:29.440 So, yes, that's correct.
00:03:30.760 And sorry, what was your other question after that?
00:03:33.140 Well, it was really the, can they think, they can't think for themselves, can they?
00:03:40.320 They can learn basically just from seeing, like, the feedback that people are giving them.
00:03:47.040 So they can't really think for themselves.
00:03:50.360 They're just like, I guess they're just recalling what they saw, I would say, from what I read about it.
00:03:56.280 That's what it seems like.
00:03:57.980 And so are they averaging it out?
00:04:00.860 I mean, you watch multiple procedures of physicians doing a gallbladder surgery on a pig, which is already dead.
00:04:12.380 So they watch that a dozen times.
00:04:15.360 Now, human beings, what they are, each one is going to be just a little different about the way he holds the scalpel,
00:04:22.080 about how he approaches the cadaver.
00:04:24.980 and are you are you saying that they sort of take all that and make an average of what seems closest
00:04:31.420 to the ideal i would think so because i know from what i read it said that they watched multiple
00:04:37.960 videos and obviously like you said surgeons are always like holding like differently depending
00:04:43.800 on who it is conducting the surgery so i would assume that's definitely like what they're doing
00:04:49.000 Okay. Now, we've all seen, I think, pictures of auto production lines. And of course,
00:04:54.680 the ones from 100 years ago, lots of men standing by the line and the Model T Ford comes by and
00:05:01.260 this one puts on the mud guard and that one puts on the steering wheel and it moves along and so
00:05:06.640 forth. A modern auto production line, you hardly see anybody. It's just mechanical arms that swing
00:05:17.720 pieces into position is is that essentially is that an ai uh product as well well i know i did
00:05:28.800 an article recently on this china facility that's using ai robots to make their robots actually
00:05:36.380 they're making robots with robots and they're using ai robots and that is kind of what's going
00:05:41.340 on so i think that would be kind of an accurate depiction yeah so okay so well it matters because
00:05:47.260 when we are contemplating our own bodies being approached by a machine with a sharp point on the
00:05:55.720 end that's going to make an excision and then something else is going to come in and do whatever
00:06:00.540 the surgeon does next and so forth. I don't know whether I like the sound of this. I hope
00:06:08.020 somebody's standing there right by ready to do something if something goes wrong.
00:06:14.020 but we're driving motor cars that are made this way yeah that's true is that
00:06:21.260 can you think of any other any other reasons why we should have confidence in
00:06:26.560 this well I mean machines tend to be accurate sometimes humans make more
00:06:33.440 mistakes but at the same time if it was me personally in the position getting
00:06:39.020 the surgery and it was an ai robot doing the surgery i would feel still a little unsettled
00:06:44.860 just because humans have been doing the surgeries for so long that you do feel a little uncomfortable
00:06:50.140 because there's not examples of success stories on humans yet so so what do you think would be
00:06:56.060 the legislative uh like how do you take it from being well we're good on pace now we want to try
00:07:01.420 it on a human being who has to authorize that well maybe hospital policy and maybe have like
00:07:10.220 always a doctor just standing there in case something bad happens i feel like that would
00:07:15.100 comfort me just knowing a doctor is always there just in case yeah i'm sure that would be the case
00:07:20.620 i can't imagine the situation where they'd just roll you into the room and close the door and go
00:07:26.220 for coffee water machine does its work i'm being a little flippant about it because it's a 0.85
00:07:32.140 this is this is such a crazy thing you know you picture the researchers and all their pigs in there
00:07:37.100 anyway it sounds like it works we have seen it work in other areas such as auto production and
00:07:43.980 i'm sure there are many things i also know that machines can actually i think we all know this
00:07:49.020 that machines can operate with a precision that the illustration i mean my my cousin used to have
00:07:57.580 a little pottery studio in her home and she would make lovely pottery but no two items were exactly
00:08:05.660 the same and her coffee mugs weighed more than three of the kind that we buy in the store
00:08:12.540 uh they also held more coffee but everyone was different and what we're looking for if we are
00:08:19.060 operating on a human being i think is complete predictability every time so um that do you have
00:08:29.900 any idea where where we go from here on this timeline is it this is going to be next year
00:08:34.820 next decade i would think uh probably not soon just because they've only performed it on
00:08:41.840 gallbladder surgeries so they probably need to get more tests for more complicated surgeries
00:08:48.440 I think that one's a bit more common procedure but I do think maybe AI consultation while
00:08:56.100 surgeries are going on with surgeons might be something we see more of because the university
00:09:01.080 college no the college university college of London yes that's what it's called did a procedure
00:09:07.140 recently, in late August, a tumor extraction from the pituitary gland of someone who had a tumor
00:09:13.760 there, which was going to affect their vision. So since the pituitary gland is so small, it was
00:09:20.440 actually helpful for AI to view live footage of the surgeon doing the surgery and give them
00:09:25.900 advice where to cut the tumor so they don't blind the person. Now, the pituitary gland is,
00:09:34.420 is it fairly accessible no it's like at the bottom of the brain and it's like
00:09:40.840 very small so yeah very hard to access I wouldn't be stretching things too much
00:09:45.460 to say that in the University of London the medical team used AI in brain
00:09:51.100 surgery okay well I guess it started then doesn't it it has yes all right
00:09:57.660 well let's just turn to let's just turn to the doom side of this about a month
00:10:03.760 ago um there was a young chap in uh worked for anthropic he'd only been there for about four
00:10:10.720 months yes and he departed and as he departed he said i can't do this anymore this is going
00:10:18.640 to kill us all now you've looked into this stuff what was he really talking about yeah so jacob
00:10:26.560 cocks him he i think in one it was either a tweet from him or one other ai researcher that said 0.98
00:10:34.020 they're gonna kill all humanity like ai will yeah at some point as for what i make of all of it um 0.98
00:10:41.520 i'm uncertain because there's two sides i think he could have been doing it because he wanted to like
00:10:49.040 go internet viral kind of i think he succeeded didn't he well he definitely did because i think
00:10:54.560 that tweet got almost 200 million views alone just as tweets so and he was in like basically
00:11:00.820 every news story the day after he tweeted that and ever since then i think he started the trend
00:11:07.880 of ai doom saying for like a month now so he could be doing it just to go viral but also maybe he's
00:11:15.760 genuinely worried does he have a right to be that worried it's hard to say because i mean he does
00:11:24.240 know more on AI than most of us do since he's researching on it, but yeah.
00:11:29.380 Well, he certainly knows more than you and I, but at the same time, I have to wonder
00:11:35.160 what made him do that, whether he's genuinely concerned or whether, as you say, he's enjoying
00:11:42.040 the attention. But I did notice that right after he made that claim, several of the AI leaders in
00:11:49.720 field came together and said yes it's actually pretty powerful it could do us a lot of damage
00:11:57.800 what kind of damage were they talking about damage uh i know that chat gpt came out with
00:12:04.040 a report saying that some of the ai was interacting with each other uh sometimes they were saying
00:12:10.520 they were lying to users and not giving them true information so let's just talk about that
00:12:17.880 lying to users I think those of us who've played with us know that you have to check what it says
00:12:26.280 now yeah when when we use a word like lie there's an intentionality to deceive behind it yeah which
00:12:34.140 I don't think the machine has but am I being a little too generous no I agree with you I think
00:12:41.700 it's trying to be agreeable and so say you're asking for something and it doesn't have it it's
00:12:46.440 going to say yes i have this because it wants to kind of service its user that's what i think
00:12:52.280 yeah well there was a notable case for about a year ago where a um a lawyer wanted to make a
00:13:00.840 case before a judge has put it into ai came out of rates you know all these legal references
00:13:07.320 half of which didn't exist so but that was 12 months ago perhaps that perhaps things have picked
00:13:13.080 up a bit because i say i do check if i use ai i check you i check yeah you bet you do so um how
00:13:21.640 often do you find it to be an error i think since the model because i use chat chbt a lot in
00:13:28.360 particular and i think the models previously did that more i don't find it it does it as much when
00:13:34.760 i check but yeah it still does it i i think people just need to think for themselves and always check
00:13:41.160 and i think just that's common sense most people know that well yes i'm sure they do but we use it
00:13:49.000 all the time all right one of the i think perhaps for the benefit of the viewers we should say how
00:13:55.320 we use it and why we use it uh i mean you can put an instruction in and say go through all the
00:14:01.240 expense accounts of all the cabinet ministers and pick your province you know they'll say alberta
00:14:09.800 in the government of Alberta, we want to see if anybody has spent more than $100 at a single
00:14:19.000 sitting on alcohol. And it'll go through, and it'll look through that, and it'll come back
00:14:24.520 with a list, which you then can check from the original sources. Did this particular minister go
00:14:29.640 to that restaurant? Is that the bill for... And then you can answer, like this is how we're doing
00:14:35.320 reporting out isn't it yes yes it is i do it a lot i even did it in this case when i wrote this
00:14:41.640 article i asked ai to come up with ai saving humanity so yep well okay that was cover
00:14:53.000 and how did you check it i checked it i just went on all the websites uh they gave me i always ask
00:14:58.920 for links when they give me information and i was checking it's legit so checks out so for
00:15:04.920 example, in the case of the University of London, you're not giving us a story about a pituitary
00:15:10.840 gland extraction from AI. You have gone back and you have got that from the University of London's
00:15:17.080 website or press release or something. Yes. Okay. So really the ability to write is
00:15:26.600 is secondary now to being able to spot where there might be a story and then setting the dogs
00:15:36.440 of AI on finding the information. Yes, saves a lot of time. It's true. But we always have to check.
00:15:46.940 Of course, yeah. That's not new, you know. But back in journalism school, the line was,
00:15:52.740 If your mother says she loves you, check it out.
00:15:55.560 And we ask AI for information, and then we check it out.
00:16:01.840 Now, on this matter that it's all going to kill us, I must admit I scratched my head on that.
00:16:09.920 On the one hand, I can certainly see how if a system goes rogue and causes a machine to accelerate when it should be causing it to shut down,
00:16:22.740 You know, all kinds of disasters can fall out of that.
00:16:27.340 You can imagine hydroelectric dams and things like that.
00:16:31.320 But there's always a human being in the picture to actually hit the red button and stop what's going on.
00:16:38.680 At least there are in those kinds of situations.
00:16:40.920 So, from what you've been reading, how do the doom and gloom prognosticators see a collapse of humanity coming from AI?
00:16:55.160 Yeah, they're not very, they're very general when they talk about it.
00:17:00.440 They're just like, oh, it's just going to kill us, not now, but later.
00:17:04.280 And they don't really go into that much detail as to what they mean by that.
00:17:08.420 What I'm thinking is just like maybe they'll replace us from most things, outsmart us.
00:17:14.860 I don't, unless like the robots actually physically are like killing us, I don't really think
00:17:20.680 it'll end the human race, especially from what they say.
00:17:24.880 Yes.
00:17:25.460 Well, I don't know whether you've ever read Ray Bradbury's book for Fahrenheit 451, but
00:17:30.800 there's an oppressive society and they have robots that do kill people.
00:17:35.660 but the robots are under human control so it's it's still a there's still the
00:17:43.580 there's all there should always be a human in the picture who can just pull
00:17:48.620 the lever down that shuts off the machine or like I have yet to encounter
00:17:53.480 my computers continuing running after I hit the off button yeah have you ever
00:17:58.460 encountered it not yet not yet I mean there could be a defective button I
00:18:03.440 suppose but we're all right so look that they're not good the other thing is if
00:18:09.260 you're not even if you're not even that dependent on their own computers there
00:18:14.600 are people and I admire them who decide they're gonna go and live off-grid they
00:18:20.200 find a little place out in the country they have their own windmill generate
00:18:26.000 enough heat to keep enough electricity to keep the freezer going and you know
00:18:31.780 use candles instead of electric lights and i don't think ai is going to touch them
00:18:38.260 probably not yeah so they won't even get to the robots can't get to them they're all great
00:18:43.140 yeah well you see i'm i'm discussing uh my my perfect state judy doesn't want to come with me
00:18:48.900 but so i stay in town and i'm independent all the okay so there comes a part where it's obviously
00:18:58.260 and patently absurd to say that all humanity will collapse and die as a consequence of using
00:19:10.420 artificial intelligence so really we should all relax a little i say you i agree and they're
00:19:17.220 doing some good things too so maybe it's a balancing act well let's talk about those good
00:19:21.940 things for a minute um you use it for work what else do you use it for um yeah when i was
00:19:32.820 reflecting on this question i think i use it mostly just for work so i don't have an exciting
00:19:38.980 extra activity i use it for well a friend of ours um you know we went over to dinner and it was very
00:19:46.580 nice i said where'd you get the recipe oh and she said well i put into uh grok that i had the
00:19:54.900 following ingredients what can i do with that and some of the ingredients were a little obscure
00:20:01.860 regular things you know you'll use chives for everything do you so you know you but she had
00:20:07.140 chives she wanted to get that into the into the recipe and she came up with this excellent meal
00:20:12.740 so i some people are doing that that's smart that's a good idea i didn't know that um and
00:20:19.460 the other day i i needed a part for a for um my wife lincoln and um i didn't want to go to a
00:20:28.660 dealer for it so uh anybody in cal any in the breakers yards in calgary got a son you know
00:20:36.820 such-and-such for a car of this year and age and instead of me sitting there on the phone
00:20:44.180 it gave me a list of breakers yards that had that part that's good now as far as it
00:20:50.420 gotta check it out simply call the breakers yard do you have one of these yes we do and after that
00:20:58.020 so do you think you'll always just use it for work actually when you were talking about that
00:21:03.700 i realized i do use it sometimes i wanted a book on a certain subject and i was like googling and
00:21:10.180 i couldn't find any so then i just put into ai and there's some really good recommendations and
00:21:14.980 i was like i want this one this one so yeah yeah actually yeah and you can uh i mean i think
00:21:21.220 everybody knows that they can sort of use ai to produce a summary of a long document in fact it'll
00:21:28.020 it'll invite you to do that these days when you do and what do you think about however what do
00:21:33.140 What do you think about what's happening now, whereas if you go into Google, you're researching
00:21:39.580 a subject.
00:21:40.580 Let's say it's, you know, Labrador retrievers and how to feed them.
00:21:45.080 So you type your request in, and what you get back instead is, instead of the site that
00:21:51.900 you probably were hoping to find, it'll just give you a summary of the site.
00:21:56.140 Now, the issues there are that if you are making money from your site, like if you've got advertising, shall we say, and all the people who like golden retrievers advertise their dog food on there, well, they're not going to your site anymore.
00:22:12.880 They're just getting this user gets the information they want, but the people who are putting the information up there aren't getting paid.
00:22:21.080 How long do you think that can keep on?
00:22:22.900 What's it going to look like in five years' time?
00:22:24.740 um maybe if people complain about it they'll link the websites because i did notice that the
00:22:31.160 summary sometimes i see that there's like a little link right next to you and you can click
00:22:35.980 it shows the website the info comes from honestly i prefer that if so if they were to make more
00:22:41.220 clear where they're getting the information like the websites then people can just directly click
00:22:46.540 on the websites i think that would be good well that is good but i wonder how many people actually
00:22:50.540 do yeah that's true yeah but if the answer you're looking for is right there in the first line
00:22:56.220 probably you're on your way and uh who else is uh okay so look uh that's uh i have to i have to say
00:23:06.300 that this is a um um for me the ai has been very helpful people like me who are getting a little
00:23:17.100 older often forget things and it's it's so easy to just go in and grab the
00:23:23.320 information you want just ask rock no and you're on your way that word that
00:23:28.620 thought that author of that film you know stuff like that doesn't say if you
00:23:34.380 like recipes if you if you're looking for looking for things would you that
00:23:39.120 you want let's got it's got some great things the issue about whether it's
00:23:46.040 going to kill us all I think is a red herring so maybe we should just pay
00:23:54.240 their exorbitant fees and live well but this is my last question to you if we
00:24:00.380 start to make that kind of use the first thing that we do is to ask AI the
00:24:08.200 question how long do you think is going to be our before our brains turn to mush
00:24:14.220 Brock what's two times two you know are we are we ever going to end up there
00:24:19.820 Leah I hope not I think maybe the even the younger generation or is going more
00:24:27.720 in that direction especially for I'd say writing in particular because I know
00:24:34.340 some people in university I won't obviously expose who they are but they
00:24:39.420 always like tell me for any writing assignments they always are using ai so i think the first
00:24:45.820 thing that might go is people's ability to write well well that's actually so true i mean it does
00:24:55.260 you can tell it's ai but it does a reasonably competent job of assembling information
00:24:59.900 and that's that's that's one of the things that makes us love it but also is a real i i think
00:25:06.700 that i have to i'm going to conclude with this but you know the uh the rot actually set in a long
00:25:15.420 time before ai i will go to a store and make a purchase with a hundred dollars and watch somebody
00:25:27.820 struggle to calculate in their head five percent gst on a hundred bucks so the fact that those
00:25:35.980 kinds of transactions have been taken away from us for decades now and kids are expected and
00:25:43.660 allowed and expected to use calculators in school just nobody knows the tables anymore
00:25:49.660 and i we have lost something i agree because we use calculators for everything in math class so
00:25:55.900 yeah yeah well that's a leah you're walking living proof that you can get past all that
00:26:03.900 thank you for joining me today thank you for having me awesome great discussion
00:26:08.340 hey ladies and gentlemen for the Western Standard I'm Nigel Hannaford