Rachel Gilmore Challenged to Live Debate on Free Speech — Will She Show？
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
174.33372
Summary
Join us as we discuss the martyrs of martyrs, and the most serious of them all, Rachael Gilmore. Join us in a debate between the Western Standard's host, Elise Mills, and Rachel "Rachael" Gilmore, as they debate the importance of freedom of speech, and what it means to be a martyr.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
well speaking of martyrs let's talk about the most serious of them all the one who has been so
00:00:05.760
wronged rachel gilmore uh rachel gilmore like it's been so hard done by it's so uh uh she's uh
00:00:17.120
again uh someone who's claimed to be censored herself and but i don't actually think has been
00:00:23.120
but uh just if she's nothing if not consistent consistently stupid and consistently wrong
00:00:33.040
and it's her god-given right believe you god or not it's her god-given right to be both of those
00:00:37.760
things every day of the week she takes full advantage of it but it's my god-given duty
00:00:41.840
to point it out and make fun of it when i can um she uh you know what i'll just put it to you
00:00:47.840
elise uh you had a great little mix up maybe um john will pull up uh some of the uh screenshots of
00:00:54.720
what happened here but she she lost her uh on cory and on you uh and then i i'm gonna i have an
00:01:02.720
invitation to make don't don't preempt me on that uh you know i'm talking about um but uh at least
00:01:08.640
why don't you just kind of give a quick synopsis and we'll throw a graphic up on the screen here okay
00:01:12.560
okay well i were i into the conversation is being an avid to do one of her i would say cheeky little
00:01:21.120
versions of pun entry but she's no longer a pundit in fact she's only being censored because she's it's
00:01:28.400
not good enough to be out there with the other pundits and commentators uh and uh i wouldn't even
00:01:37.040
call it it's it's not censoring it's just we're not interested no thank you um but everything has to
00:01:42.400
turn into some sort of hate issue or anti-feminist or you know with rachel gilmar there it can't just
00:01:49.360
be that she's terrible at what she does and she also doesn't i don't believe that she is very truthful
00:01:54.000
and factful and this is a great example of that largely ignored because um she's she's not worth my
00:02:01.920
time but when she starts spewing i think um very dangerous uh mis misinformation disinformation i'm
00:02:09.600
going to lean on disinformation and she manipulates what is very clear uh which was very clear in the
00:02:15.440
charter uh to suit her own purposes and i we can only surmise what those goals and objectives and
00:02:22.160
purposes are um but i stepped forward because she had written a tweet um i believe it was some sort of
00:02:28.080
screen capture from um this show that she does in her living room called bubble pop um and it was talking
00:02:37.120
about uh what freedom of expression is that we don't have freedom of speech that he has no the singer
00:02:42.640
had no right to be there i mean it went on on on and it was garbage um it was it was rooted in absolute
00:02:51.360
falsehood so i stepped in and she proceeded not to address my tweets because she was too cowardly to
00:02:57.200
actually debate me in that that conversation but then she sort of subtweeted me and i think core of some of
00:03:04.880
this and so i just responded and said listen let gloves off let's have a debate i'm asking you to
00:03:10.720
debate me on the charter of rights i'm asking you to debate me on this particular issue and for you to
00:03:16.400
stand by by um the well i would say the untruthful if you believe that um then you have a serious
00:03:30.720
problem and maybe you in my language um and i wish i could say the same thing about ms gilmore you can
00:03:36.240
tell exactly where ms gilmore's coming from in this conversation guys because the vernacular
00:03:43.600
the style the tone of her response to me really said everything about her lack of education on this
00:03:50.960
matter and like i said to you derek it's really dangerous we need to correct uh the damage that
00:03:55.840
rachel gilmore's doing and others like her yeah uh so you know uh soon after this i you know i got
00:04:03.760
a chuckle actually we all we had a gut a gut bursting laughter in the newsroom yesterday when we saw
00:04:10.480
uh this stuff between you and her and corey uh going on uh so i i i gave you a call uh no i what i
00:04:17.840
tweeted is uh first uh you try to do a debate and i said the western standard be happy to host
00:04:22.640
uh to which she's just no no yeah okay fine whatever um but uh i called you up i said i think
00:04:34.000
we should actually do this so um this is an invitation right now it's going to be uh in her
00:04:40.320
mailbox uh john uh production here make sure remind me to do it as soon as uh we're done recording here
00:04:46.080
uh 2 p.m uh you tell me if this time works 2 p.m mountain standard time thursday that'll be july 31st
00:04:54.640
uh we're gonna debate rachel gilmore uh we're having a debate between rachel gilmore and elise mills
00:05:01.840
uh i don't expect her she's already said no so i don't expect her to uh take us up on it but we're
00:05:09.360
gonna send her a zoom link uh or uh stream yard is what we use on the back end here we're gonna send
00:05:14.080
her a link and she can come in at any time she come in just tell us to f off and and leave she
00:05:19.680
can stay for five seconds if she likes but uh we're gonna we're gonna host that debate and if not uh
00:05:25.520
we'll just uh we'll just talk about the episode we're gonna do that tomorrow we're gonna do it live
00:05:30.560
at 2 p.m mountain standard time maybe you should throw in a pair of american eagle jeans maybe that'll
00:05:37.440
the winner gets american eagle jeans i will be there with my copy okay uh