Western Standard - July 31, 2026


Worse off now, than under Trudeau?


Episode Stats


Length

25 minutes

Words per minute

144.96

Word count

3,655

Sentence count

183


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
00:00:00.000 Good evening, Western Standard viewers, and welcome to Hannaford, a weekly politics show
00:00:20.800 of the Western Standard. It is Thursday, July the 30th, and for news, it's the dog days of summer.
00:00:27.820 Luckily, to explain things and pick out what matters from the mess and what doesn't,
00:00:32.620 we have with us our old friend Yaroslav Baran, co-founder of the Pendulum Group,
00:00:38.140 a strategic advisor based in Ottawa. He was also a former advisor to Prime Minister Stephen Harper,
00:00:46.940 but that was years ago. Yaroslav, it's good to see you again.
00:00:50.220 Always good to be here, Nigel. Thanks for the invitation to come back.
00:00:54.940 Well, I described the mess, and you say, actually, there are some serious issues.
00:01:01.120 So what is on your mind today?
00:01:05.240 Well, the big story around Ottawa these days, around federal politics, is Canada-U.S. trade.
00:01:11.860 It's been a dominant thing for a year, but as you know, Nigel,
00:01:16.060 July 1st was the deadline for Canada, the United States, and Mexico to extend the North American free trade agreement.
00:01:26.420 July 1st came and went, and the deal was not extended.
00:01:29.940 It's not just that it's not extended yet, but it was a one-day window to extend the deal, and the deal was not extended.
00:01:36.660 So that means that we are technically now on a sunset track for the North American Free Trade Agreement to expire in 10 years.
00:01:47.780 Now, it still could be extended a year from now or two years from now.
00:01:53.120 There will be one-day windows popping up for each of those 10 years.
00:01:57.060 But right now, we are officially now on a sunset track for the North American Free Trade Agreement to expire.
00:02:05.520 Now, before we get too excited about that, you say it expires in 10 years.
00:02:11.680 Mr. Trump has got another two and a half years, and a different president may see things very differently.
00:02:18.600 Should we be lighting our hair on fire yet?
00:02:22.700 Well, look, there is a real possibility still that this trilateral trade agreement could be salvaged.
00:02:30.960 But if you're working in some specific sectors, notably things like steel or aluminum or automobiles or lumber, you're already laying your hair on fire because those commodities were not protected by the North American Free Trade Agreement and are currently under significant, significant tariffs.
00:02:51.560 and Prime Minister Carney was elected as the great dealmaker.
00:02:58.020 Arguably, probably everybody would agree that the reason he did win the election last year
00:03:03.040 was that he was seen as the guy who could get a deal with Donald Trump.
00:03:08.340 Right now, we're in a position where the window to cut that deal has come and gone
00:03:13.700 and there is no deal.
00:03:14.760 What's more is that right now, today, the trade situation is even worse than it was
00:03:22.900 a month ago because we have two new rounds of tariffs that have also been levied.
00:03:28.980 There's a new, a brand new 50% reciprocal equivalent tariff batch that's going to come
00:03:36.400 into effect in about 20 days or so with a whole schedule of Canadian commodities that
00:03:43.960 going to be whacked with a major tariff. And those tariffs are not going to be sheltered
00:03:52.140 by KUSMA, by the free trade agreement. In addition to that, there's a fresh wave of
00:03:58.020 10% tariffs for alleged use of forced labor goods in the supply chain. Now, we can quibble
00:04:08.100 about whether or not there's fact behind those allegations from the U.S., but the reality is that
00:04:14.680 we've got two new rounds of tariffs, 10 percent tariffs and 50 percent tariffs that didn't exist
00:04:20.320 a month ago. Let's just quickly dispose of the matter of the slave labor tariff. First of all,
00:04:27.840 if it is slave labor, 10 percent is not enough. But more to the point, what Canadian exports to
00:04:35.000 the united states might have something in them that was generated under a forced labor regime
00:04:44.220 well i mean that's a good question i mean i would imagine that it would be things like
00:04:49.580 potentially textiles value-added products that are made in canada but using components that have come
00:04:55.740 from other from other countries most notably uh east asia and southeast asia
00:05:02.700 It seems to have come from nowhere, Yaroslav.
00:05:05.860 It did come from nowhere.
00:05:07.640 Yeah, and in fairness, the 10% forced labour tariff did not single out Canada.
00:05:13.200 It was a handful of countries that were collectively singled out.
00:05:18.500 The government of Canada has introduced legislation to strengthen our controls to ensure that the forced labour products are not in our supply chain.
00:05:29.720 There's been a consultation launched by foreign affairs on this question as well.
00:05:35.960 But, you know, with tariffs, especially with Donald Trump, the accusation is made, the
00:05:42.380 tariff is levied, and then, you know, you're scrambling to try to demonstrate that the
00:05:47.360 allegations are not, in fact, correct.
00:05:50.480 So that's the 10% tariff.
00:05:51.980 The other one, the other one is bigger.
00:05:53.720 That's the 50% tariff.
00:05:55.200 That's the reciprocal equivalent tariffs.
00:05:58.040 Basically, it's alleging that Canada is discriminating against the U.S. on dairy, on vehicles, and on alcoholic beverages.
00:06:05.860 Now, again, we can quibble about whether those allegations are factual or not,
00:06:10.960 but a whole bunch of commodities as of August 19th are now going to face a new 50%, 5-0% tariff
00:06:20.320 that will not be sheltered by the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Free Trade Agreement.
00:06:25.800 So that's going to be a really big hit.
00:06:28.780 So is that Mr. Trump laying down an arbitrary barrier so that he's got something to squeeze us with?
00:06:39.160 Yeah, I mean, this appears to be his flexing of muscles against his own Supreme Court and against his own detractors domestically.
00:06:49.140 There have been a number of instances where he's imposed tariffs.
00:06:52.080 Courts have reversed those tariffs saying that they're unlawful or unconstitutional.
00:06:57.980 And so he tries again through a different mechanism, through a different trade law using a different section.
00:07:04.660 So he's always one step ahead of the game, ensuring that a tariff law continues to be erected because he sees that as, I mean, for Canadian governments historically,
00:07:19.180 free trade or cutting new trade deals is something that you'd wear on your sleeve in going to face
00:07:26.800 the voters. The MAGA movement seems to believe that tariff walls are political capital that
00:07:35.580 will help them into the midterm elections this fall. Now, the car industry is starting to look
00:07:44.580 like it's beyond salvage how say you uh well that's going to be a really difficult one i mean
00:07:51.320 automobiles are a little bit complicated in that the tariffs applied to canadian cars only pertain
00:07:58.900 to the non-american components i mean you've you've heard the statistics a typical car goes
00:08:04.360 back and forth across the border about seven or eight times before it before it hits the uh the
00:08:09.660 dealership. So basically every car in North America has some Canadian parts, some American
00:08:15.880 parts, some assembly in Canada, some assembly in the States. That's a function of how integrated
00:08:22.100 the supply chain and the manufacturing system is. So there are complicated formulas to determine
00:08:30.860 how much of each vehicle is actually Canadian-made versus American-made. But one way or another,
00:08:37.380 If these tariffs hold, either the current tariffs, let alone anything new that might be coming our way, if these are not negotiated away or negotiated down, it would be very difficult to imagine a domestic Canadian automobile industry surviving this in the longer term.
00:08:55.460 Do you have any idea how much Canadian auto production has already shrunk since the president started on the warpath back in January of last year?
00:09:05.760 Yeah, and I'm not sure that we've got credible statistics just yet, but we have seen a number of announcements by major auto manufacturers putting a pause on previously announced investments into expanding their Canadian manufacturing operations.
00:09:25.740 So that's usually the first sign that trouble is around the corner.
00:09:31.160 It starts with saying, oh, that big plant, those billions we were planning to invest over the next decade, we're just going to put that on hold for a second.
00:09:39.220 We'll see what the future brims.
00:09:41.080 If that, again, if that doesn't get reversed, then it definitely signals long-term pain and possibly the end of a domestic car manufacturing industry.
00:09:50.660 So, let's turn to the Gordie Howe Bridge, Yaroslav.
00:09:56.700 That should have been a very good news story, but it seems to be not so.
00:10:02.560 The best they can do with it from the domestic media point of view is take note that the
00:10:07.260 Howe family, the descendants of the great Gordie Howe, were the first people to cross
00:10:12.580 it, which was nice, but nobody really wants to talk about the deal Mr. Carney made to
00:10:18.100 get it open.
00:10:19.500 What's that about?
00:10:21.320 Yeah, I mean, the history here, the Windsor-Detroit border crossing is the single busiest border crossing in North America.
00:10:29.700 And I've heard it referred to as the single biggest international trade crossing anywhere in the world.
00:10:36.700 And until now, there's been one bridge that was opened up about 100 years ago in the hands of a private family.
00:10:44.720 So this family with this precious asset that generates millions upon millions upon millions of dollars for that family, they've been guarding it.
00:10:55.620 They've been very protectionist over that bridge, and they've tried to oppose the building of a new bridge.
00:11:00.100 Under the Harper government back in 2012, a deal was made between Canada and the U.S. to build a new bridge.
00:11:07.600 It had been discussed for a long time.
00:11:09.420 the final deal was that canada would finance the bridge on its own and eventually there would be
00:11:15.180 some uh some some toll sharing between the two countries now just as the bridge was finalized
00:11:21.980 donald trump announced about a bit over a month ago that no he's not going to permit the bridge
00:11:27.580 to be opened why because that wealthy american family owning the competition that donated a
00:11:33.980 million to a super PAC that backed Donald Trump. In the end, a last minute deal was reached. Mr.
00:11:41.480 Carney announced this while he was actually in your hometown in Calgary at the Stampede. He
00:11:46.860 announced the deal had been reached, a win-win for everybody. The problem is that the devil
00:11:52.940 was in the details. And when the actual texts of the deal was publicized, it contradicted what
00:12:00.420 Prime Minister Carney said about the deal. He had said that there'd be very little sharing of
00:12:06.840 tolls because first the tolls would pay for operations of the bridge and financing the debt
00:12:15.040 that went into building the bridge in the first place. But that last part was not correct. It was
00:12:19.980 not factual. I'm not going to impugn motive. I'm not going to suggest that it was a deliberate
00:12:25.840 attempt at deception but it was a total game changer in terms of the dollars and cents so
00:12:31.760 the new deal actually starts to share tolls right away without the debt financing of the bridge
00:12:40.960 the cost of building the bridge being being deducted right away big difference and frankly
00:12:49.440 objectively speaking the prime minister's had egg on his face he's been hounded by journalists over
00:12:53.760 this issue for the last couple weeks saying why did you deceive why were you not truthful about
00:12:59.520 about this deal when you first announced it so in politics that's the kind of thing we refer
00:13:04.160 to as an unforced error there was a communications blunder that was completely avoidable and as re
00:13:11.520 as recently as today nigel there was a special meeting of the house of common government
00:13:16.720 operation committee with opposition mps calling for an investigation of this deal and the
00:13:22.240 the communications around this deal, but the liberals on that committee used their newfound
00:13:27.260 majority to block the proposed investigation. Well, okay. Let's be charitable to Mr. Carney
00:13:39.880 and say, given what he is up against, could anybody have done any better or any different?
00:13:49.240 does mr trump have a peculiar dislike for canada's liberal party and the people that
00:13:57.720 elects to lead would it have been different under a conservative government basically
00:14:03.860 when the president says we're going to do things this way that tends to be the way they get done
00:14:09.380 do we have as a country no leverage is there nothing that we have that they want
00:14:16.360 this this is an interesting set of questions and you know i'll try to answer it as dispassionately
00:14:23.440 and as objectively as i can from my from my perspective um canada does have leverage and
00:14:30.240 we have used leverage for example we had the digital services tax we had things like requirements
00:14:36.760 for uh for for tech giant streaming companies in the states to pay into uh into a canadian
00:14:43.420 culture fund. We have things like the F-35, the fighter jet contract that we're still waiting
00:14:51.560 for a final decision from the government of Canada on whether it's going to do the full order of the
00:14:56.720 American jets or do maybe a mixed fleet of some American jets and a bunch of Swedish jets. So
00:15:04.300 there are points of leverage. We also, Canada dominates internationally on commodities like
00:15:11.280 potash or aluminum, for example, half more than half the aluminum that the US economy uses is
00:15:18.520 imported from Canada. There's a whole bunch of energy exports from Canada to the United States.
00:15:24.140 So yes, we do have leverage. That said, there appears to be a particular disdain
00:15:31.500 by Donald Trump against Canada. And many analysts are saying that that is because
00:15:38.980 Canada is one of the few countries that retaliated when U.S. tariffs were announced and that has tried to use leverage rather than just sort of capitulating and trying to cut the best deal we can.
00:15:52.360 So as a Canadian patriot, on the one hand, I have to acknowledge that it's good to see our country putting the elbows up and retaliating when we ought to retaliate when we're faced with unfair tariffs.
00:16:11.340 But objectively, other countries that were also facing U.S. tariffs had a much easier road to negotiating a less painful deal because they did not take that kind of elbows up approach and they did not retaliate.
00:16:28.240 They did not counter with their own tariffs against the United States, and they did not try to jam Americans by using using the leverage that they had.
00:16:37.520 So where does that leave us?
00:16:39.220 Who knows?
00:16:39.780 Could somebody else have cut a better deal?
00:16:42.080 We can't know what we can't know.
00:16:44.160 But there definitely appears to be a particular disdain for Canada in the way it's been negotiating with the United States.
00:16:52.320 The North American Trade Agreement, as you know, has three partners.
00:16:55.940 One of them is Mexico.
00:16:57.380 And the U.S.-Mexico negotiations are going far more smoothly than the U.S.-Canada negotiations because Mexico has taken a different approach.
00:17:06.980 So the Mexicans have more or less said, well, what do you need?
00:17:10.080 Give it to you and they're on their way?
00:17:13.380 I don't think it's fair to say that they're capitulating,
00:17:16.880 but they're definitely taking a far less retaliatory approach.
00:17:21.800 Now, mind you, Canada is far more exposed to U.S. tariffs than any other country.
00:17:28.660 76% of our exports go to the United States.
00:17:32.340 No other country is that trade exposed to one trading partner, at least not to my knowledge, at least not to that degree.
00:17:39.320 So the stakes are higher for Canada than for other countries.
00:17:42.620 But, you know, we'll see.
00:17:46.200 We'll see if the failure to get a deal and for the, frankly, currently worsening trade situation is going to eventually, in the longer term, translate into a political liability for Mr. Carney, who was elected as the great dealmaker.
00:18:01.700 And, you know, Nigel, just the other day, Angus Reid came out with a poll showing that Canadians' confidence in Prime Minister Carney to secure a good deal for Canada has dropped significantly compared to a few months ago.
00:18:19.100 So Canadians are starting to lose faith that this government can secure a good deal for Canada.
00:18:24.700 Well, you can see why. Now, some of the commodities that you mentioned that we supply, we supply oil, we supply aluminium, we supply potash, is the American demand for that only met by Canada? They could buy elsewhere, perhaps.
00:18:46.860 Question then, is there something that they want, and I'm thinking perhaps of strategic minerals, that they can only get from us?
00:18:57.100 Yeah, I mean, there is a critical mineral race going on right now.
00:19:01.120 Currently, China is the world's biggest exporter of critical minerals.
00:19:07.160 There are components that are required for the future, for the contemporary high-tech industry, for semiconductors, for microchips.
00:19:16.860 that only come from a select number of countries.
00:19:20.040 China is producing and exporting them in spades.
00:19:23.720 Canada is sitting on a mountain of critical minerals.
00:19:26.800 We need to get to them.
00:19:28.260 They're more expensive to extract.
00:19:30.460 They're more expensive to refine,
00:19:32.340 but we've got a lot of them.
00:19:34.080 So there has been a lot of talk over the last decade
00:19:37.260 about a North American integrated critical minerals market.
00:19:41.400 I think that's a good narrative for Canada
00:19:43.880 to bring into trade discussions.
00:19:46.860 It's a good sort of tantalizing theme to try to get the Americans on side because the Americans do continue to see China as the number one geopolitical adversary.
00:19:56.400 So they should be interested in partnerships on critical minerals.
00:20:00.240 Now, that said, it is leverage that right now is a little bit more theoretical than real because we are not extracting very much volume of critical minerals right now.
00:20:14.540 It's more of something we can do rather than something we're doing a lot of right now.
00:20:19.480 And then other things like potash is a great example.
00:20:24.420 The other countries that produce a lot of potash other than Canada are Russia and Belarus.
00:20:30.560 So if we were to try to use potash as leverage, say maybe a boycott of potash exports to the United States to try to flex our muscles,
00:20:39.760 Well, all that we would be doing would be facilitating a greater relationship between the U.S. and our geopolitical adversaries, Russia and its vassal state, Belarus, because at the end of the day, American agricultural producers are going to need fertilizer.
00:21:02.380 They're going to get it one way or another. So it's a little bit precarious to try to use leverage, even when you do have it.
00:21:09.760 Okay, we're very rapidly running out of time, Yaroslav, which is a shame because I wanted to ask you about so many things.
00:21:15.960 However, advice to Mr. Carney, you're in the business of strategic advice.
00:21:21.900 If he would listen to you, what would you tell him?
00:21:26.560 I would probably tell him, okay, first of all, the Gordie Howe thing, totally avoidable, totally avoidable.
00:21:32.420 Do not shoot from the hip when you're announcing a new agreement between two countries.
00:21:37.160 make sure you get it right. Make sure you get it factual. And if you don't get it right the first
00:21:43.740 time, get it right the second time. Don't wait until the sixth or seventh attempt to explain it
00:21:48.940 and then still be caught up by reporters for having not been accurate. So that's one thing.
00:21:55.800 But on the trade side of it, my advice would just be however possible, try to keep the temperature
00:22:02.520 down try to be try to try to not be pokey in in the tone of your um any kind of a discourse about
00:22:13.160 the u.s or about the canada u.s negotiation process while still holding as many cards close
00:22:21.220 to your chest as you can i mean the fighter jet procurement decision is one of the the best levers
00:22:26.240 that we have i'm not sure i'd be broadcasting it as prime minister oh you better give us a good
00:22:31.040 trade deal or we're going to take our multi multi-billion dollar fighter jet deal somewhere
00:22:36.300 else but don't play that card um until until you have to because there's been i think some fair
00:22:43.680 criticism so far that on a number of issues where we did have leverage we gave it away just to keep
00:22:51.300 the negotiations going and didn't get anything in return and that's ultimately not a very good look
00:22:56.440 It does not come across as you being, you know, the dealmaker, negotiator that everybody thought you would be.
00:23:04.040 I noticed you didn't tell them to drop supply management.
00:23:08.300 Well, that would be a really thorny issue that could explode the detente that we have right now between our provincial premiers.
00:23:19.300 We've got significant forces in Canada calling for an end to supply management and dairy and others saying over my dead body.
00:23:26.440 we probably don't need those kinds of internal bowels right now when we're trying to port
00:23:31.080 solidaries so that's a sticky one it really is sticky you're probably right but cheaper cheese
00:23:36.040 would be good but you know what guys if you can give me 10 more seconds there are things we can
00:23:42.680 do on supply management or on access to dairy to the dairy market without tearing up the whole
00:23:49.480 system. Canada recently cut a deal with New Zealand, which also had complaints about supply
00:24:00.120 management. And through some creative re-evaluation of who is entitled to quota, we were able to
00:24:09.320 satisfy New Zealand without having to completely re-engineer or re-orchestrate or tear up our
00:24:14.920 supply management system so there is some maneuverability in negotiating while keep still
00:24:20.920 keeping supply management in place uh that that does that does allow our trade partners to feel
00:24:26.520 that they're getting a better uh fairer access to the canadian market okay well let's hope they use
00:24:33.960 that ladies and gentlemen yarislaf baran strategic advisor to prime ministers and aspiring prime
00:24:40.840 ministers as well, talking to us from Ottawa about the trade mess. Thank you, Yaroslav.
00:24:46.620 It is such a pleasure to have your perspective.
00:24:48.820 Always a pleasure, Nigel. Looking forward to coming back soon.
00:24:53.320 And you will. Ladies and gentlemen, for the Western Standard, I'm Nigel Hannaford.
00:25:10.840 You