Ali Dawah - February 21, 2017CONFIDENT ATHEIST'S ARGUMENT BACKFIRES BADLY ｜｜ SPEAKERS CORNER
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
208.67984
Summary
Jummah Kutbahayah In this video, I give my opinion on the difference between consciousness and consciousness. I explain the difference and give my point of view on the matter. I also give my argument on the case of a scientist who claimed that energy has consciousness and that it's making conscious decisions.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Assalamu alaikum wa rahmatullahi wabarakatuh brothers and sisters hope you guys are doing well
00:00:02.780
before the video starts i just wanted to address a few issues point number one it might seem like
00:00:06.460
i'm speaking rude to him or mocking him now what we need to understand is in the dawah we should
00:00:10.300
be respectful to the individual the opposite uh person who's getting who's genuine right now this
00:00:15.520
person is a individual who's in source the prophet in source islam um is liar he lies unfortunately
00:00:21.800
and he causes interest he tries to cause trouble so that's why i want you guys to understand that
00:00:26.600
the way i'm talking to him um is because he deserves it now this doesn't mean you need to
00:00:32.060
understand if somebody insults you swears at you don't drop to their level because i haven't i
00:00:35.780
didn't disrespect him right i did not swear i'm i did not insult him maybe i was talking in a way
00:00:39.660
might seem rude but i think that's the least that i can uh do to uh towards him when speaking besides
00:00:46.740
the point anyway now his claim my claim is this right he claims we come from energy energy is
00:00:51.400
eternal my issue is this if energy we have conscious i'm a conscious being i have rationality
00:00:57.400
and i have a will right he's saying that we come from energy i'm saying if that's the case
00:01:02.480
how can energy give me conscious rationality and a will when energy itself doesn't have conscious
00:01:08.760
rationality and a will imagine these guys imagine this guys if i said i have a water a bottle empty
00:01:16.220
bottle and if i said if we give that bottle enough time we will have a chocolate fudge cake
00:01:21.720
with strawberries inside yeah now the question here is to be asked is this if the bottle doesn't
00:01:27.680
have the elements of making a chocolate fudge cake uh with extra brownies and extra strawberries
00:01:33.480
how would it ever give us that it doesn't have it in the first place so i as a human being how can i
00:01:40.160
evolve from that energy that particle whatever it may be right if it doesn't have the qualities of
00:01:45.440
consciousness rationality i never will so this is my argument now for him to counter that he goes to
00:01:51.380
something called the double slit experiment i'm going to show you guys on the screen when it's an
00:01:56.080
it's this is small atomic atomic particles being fired between two slits right when it's not being
00:02:02.900
observed it acts like a wave right they have it acts like a wave as you can see on the screen right
00:02:08.240
however when they put a camera there and it's being observed it acts like a particle you'll only
00:02:15.300
see two slits instead of four or five now his claim is which is a bit crazy and no scientist is
00:02:21.360
coming and saying this and even one one of them he quotes it's a theory he's just claiming that no
00:02:27.100
evidence now they're saying that oh energy has consciousness that's evidence that it has
00:02:32.240
consciousness it's making conscious decisions my point is very clear and very simple yeah because the
00:02:38.180
guy came he came very confident but unfortunately he didn't understand uh this point now every time
00:02:45.280
it's being observed every time it acts like a particle every single time it's being observed it
00:02:50.700
acts nothing but like a particle it doesn't act like a wave my question is this if something is acting the
00:02:56.480
same way every time there's something there that means it's systematic that means it's just following
00:03:02.040
one law right now the question is this let me give you guys an example let's use siri right hey siri
00:03:08.120
look it just reacted right okay let's try let's try that again yeah hey siri
00:03:19.420
now it's it's systematic every time i say something it acts a certain way
00:03:27.340
does that mean i'm going to come to the conclusion that siri is conscious and siri is making conscious
00:03:33.020
decisions siri hello siri how's your day been today did you have biryani is he going to respond
00:03:39.160
to me and say oh brother ali alhamdulillah i had a beautiful day just prayed uh uh salat al-zuhur
00:03:43.860
and i'm going to have some food that if it says that you're going to say okay it's conscious but
00:03:48.300
it's not so the fact that every time i say something it acts the same way just as the way if i go
00:03:53.600
press the home button the screen it appears home button do you get what i'm trying to say so my
00:03:58.920
question was very simple if you are claiming that energy is conscious why is it every time it's
00:04:04.380
being observed it acts like a particle instead of a wave let's watch the video and find out inshallah
00:04:09.660
it's funny he ends up trying to speak to my uh trainers let's see if my trainers respond
00:04:14.320
one second brothers calm down is this energy it's made it's made it's made of my shoes it's made of
00:04:26.420
sub-atomic particles yes is it energy stop playing where this is this is energy am i energy yes why is
00:04:32.480
it that i have conscious rationality you're arranged with a brain and a nervous system can you allow me to
00:04:37.260
use my brain it doesn't come from the brain allow me to use my brain okay i have conscious i have
00:04:42.160
rationality i have a will i have a will to do what i like why doesn't my trainers why doesn't my
00:04:46.720
trainers right on a sub okay no no no break it down to you break it down now guys you've heard me say
00:04:52.840
this many times before no we haven't ali after one year still has not investigated it let's break it
00:04:58.320
down to you break it down for me right make sure you can break yourself down is everybody aware is
00:05:02.480
everybody aware of the double slit experiment by now yes we are you must be yes yes we are everybody is
00:05:08.040
yes these are sub-atomic particles yes everyone can see this when they're not being observed they act
00:05:15.720
like waves okay good yes yes when they're being observed yes as here they change their form they
00:05:23.320
turn into particles okay there's a state of awareness okay state of consciousness and record this yeah state
00:05:29.720
of consciousness gary today's janazah for you right today is janazah means funeral because you know what you're
00:05:35.560
finished right now this is why he that makes the claim as a burden of proof you're not going to win
00:05:40.680
today what's right inshallah right okay so when it's observed it behaves like particles now professor
00:05:51.000
dean raddin this is in here who is this dean right okay make sure you record this yeah right dean raddin
00:05:57.080
has demonstrated not only if you look at particles do they behave differently also if you think about them
00:06:05.560
they behave differently there's an interaction with thought as well as seeing yes now q u
00:06:14.120
okay okay okay okay you heard what he said i said to him very simply yeah he says energy everything's
00:06:20.280
energy i said energy does it have rationality does it have consciousness and does it have a will his claim
00:06:25.320
is a double slit experiment to prove to us that when it's being observed it acts a certain way my question is
00:06:31.960
this and i dare you to answer look when it's been when it can you just open that picture if you don't
00:06:36.040
mind go to this double split when it's a wave okay this one this one okay when it is not being
00:06:42.760
observed how does it act it acts as a wave when it's being observed how does it acts as a particle but
00:06:47.160
it's the same thing it's used in the same one second one second gary after this go home no no ali i'm
00:06:52.200
coming after this go back and pray again okay okay if after this go and pray again okay you've got
00:06:58.200
you've got one more person one second one second just give your punchline one second and stop building
00:07:02.520
up to this drum roll you have to build it up there's no drum roll here because i've got a cannon a
00:07:08.840
cannon fire for you your cannon is going to backfire to you come on let's hear your punchline when it's
00:07:15.560
not being observed it acts like a wave yes yes when it's been observed it acts like a particle yes
00:07:21.320
can it act like a particle no can it act like a wave when it's been observed yes it can act in both ways
00:07:27.800
evidence in both ways evidence because evidence please okay we'll give you everything calm down
00:07:32.520
i'm calm let's calm right down you know where someone comes yeah you're dizzy now let's calm
00:07:36.440
right you're dizzy now right now let's come right down go on show us let's come right down
00:07:39.080
show us screenshot did you hear now when now hold on a second did they understand now when we observe
00:07:44.840
it yes just before it goes through the slit yes it acts it acts as a wave and a particle it's only
00:07:51.080
at the point of going through the slit it then decides what slit to go through okay good my
00:07:57.080
question that is acting irrelevant irrelevant i said in both states listen guys i want to make
00:08:02.200
it simple double slit experiments days find these particles yeah when it's not being observed no
00:08:06.920
cameras there yeah it acts like a wave when it's being observed it acts like a particle i'm saying
00:08:14.440
when it gets observed is there any conclusion that it acts like a wave my friend silence you are not
00:08:21.000
listening to me once again night's night eyes no i'm gonna show you show me it acts in both states
00:08:26.680
because no it doesn't so i'll tell you why could i tell you why should i tell you why
00:08:30.920
okay okay you came too close no no no no you came to come no no no you came to come come hold
00:08:33.800
on a second it's too close ali calm down i'm calm down breathe i'm breathing when you're talking about
00:08:38.360
it being observed can you be more specifically there you go look at this no no i don't know i don't
00:08:48.380
Are you talking about it being physically looked at or physically filmed?
00:08:57.260
Are you talking about it visually being looked at or observed?
00:09:09.060
I'm telling you, if I go to a printer and press print, print, print, print, print, what does it do?
00:09:35.020
When I go to my iPad, when I press a button, something's happening.
00:09:41.580
When it's being fired and it's being observed, it acts like a particle.
00:10:01.320
Anyways, by the way, can I use this for my channel, yeah?
00:10:03.240
I'm going to make it very, very simple for you.
00:10:15.980
Are you saying, very simply, when the particles are being observed, are you talking about
00:10:25.000
No, I want to make sure he knows about this very much.
00:10:28.940
I want to make sure he knows about this very much.
00:10:33.440
Are you talking about being visually looked at or visually filmed?
00:10:53.760
If the particles are being physically observed.
00:11:11.880
As Professor Dean Radin has pointed out, if it is observed, it behaves like a particle.
00:11:21.520
But also, what this new technology has taken place in 2016.
00:11:27.320
If you also think about it, it also behaves as a particle.
00:11:35.660
Just by thinking it or looking at it, it behaves.
00:11:39.700
And listen, Ali, this is your downfall, Mayweather style.
00:11:46.320
Now, Mr. Dean Radin, in this breakthrough, in double-sit experiment, this is what he did.
00:11:58.540
He got candidates right down the hallway to say, when I say go, I want you all to visualize
00:12:14.460
There's a state of awareness where the particles knew to behave as a wave or a particle.
00:12:27.300
I mean, you're just like a boxer, but there's no punch behind you.
00:12:44.780
He's saying, look, once again, when it's not being observed.
00:13:05.300
That's why I said to you, Gary, don't do this to yourself today.
00:13:11.040
When it's not being observed, it acts like a wave.
00:13:13.320
When it's being observed, the camera is caught.
00:13:37.820
Can you see before, there's a double slit, yes?
00:13:46.160
The electrons, particles or atoms are now deciding what slit to go into.
00:13:56.000
They are acting as both waves and particles at that point.
00:14:09.100
When they're acting as both, why, when they're observed, they're acting as both?
00:14:16.680
But what I'm trying to say to you, but what I'm trying to say to you, Ali, you're missing
00:14:44.660
Now, it's only when they're being observed, they then decide a decision is made on whether
00:14:50.780
to continue behaving as a particle wave or just make one decision.
00:15:08.060
Humans are made up of the same stuff that everything else is made of.
00:15:12.260
If we look at the human body and go down to the scale, we find cells, molecules, atoms,
00:15:39.200
Energy, in fact, serving on a universal consciousness.
00:16:04.880
Now, it's time to get up, come back to his own.
00:16:13.560
One second, one second, one second, one second.
00:16:25.960
When it's being fired, what my dear brother Garrett is saying is that at this moment, right
00:16:31.340
here, when it's being fired, it's both particles and waves.
00:16:36.160
For argument's sake, man, I'll take that as well.
00:16:47.520
When it's not being observed, it acts like a wave.
00:17:02.800
Ali, shall I show you what your problem is now?
00:17:23.180
when it's been fired out it's both particles and waves
00:17:28.280
when it's being observed, the camera is put there
00:17:40.860
if it makes decisions, it should act like a wave
00:18:37.100
something has to know to react to the environment
00:22:22.280
Now, if you can explain this using common sense and logic