On this week's episode of The War Room, host STEPHEN K. BONUS EPISODE featuring special guest MICHAEL KLEEES (The Whatever Podcast) and co-host Nakia Winters (The Weekly Standard) join host Stephen K. Brodsky ( ) to discuss the latest in the Trump administration, including the new charges brought against President Trump by former White House lawyer Jack Smith, and the Democratic National Committee s attempt to ban books in public schools.
00:04:55.000Are you on the side of Tim Walls and scandalizing kids and peddling weird sex stuff to everybody?
00:04:59.000Ori on the side of, and I'll use the word that they really like, the normal people like Donald Trump and J.D. Vance and the Republicans.
00:05:08.000Sort of the same, I think, legal and dictionary jujitsu that they play with misinformation and disinformation and conspiracy theories where they don't really want to describe what exactly the books are that were banning.
00:05:18.000Make it seem like we just wanna, you know, take out any book that wouldn't have, you know, fit under Donald Trump's 1776 project.
00:05:26.000You know, or it's rather the 1619 project, right?
00:05:29.000If it's not full-blown revisionist history, get it out of the classrooms.
00:05:33.000But I think your personal kind of experience with this illustrates the problem perfectly.
00:05:37.000I believe it was the University of Buffalo was just revealed today that you were added, you're a new persona non grata.
00:05:45.000I don't know if you ever had any standing there to begin with.
00:05:55.000I was just informed by the Young America's Foundation that the University of Buffalo Media Studies Department, one of their academic departments,
00:06:02.000has a permanent denunciation of me on the homepage of their website.
00:06:10.000They devote several sentences to denouncing me because I said that men and women are different.
00:06:16.000The same topic we were just talking about.
00:06:18.000I am not a graduate of the University of Buffalo.
00:06:21.000I have never been employed by the University of Buffalo.
00:06:24.000I gave a speech there one time, a year and a half ago, on a different topic actually.
00:06:30.000But because of another speech that I gave at CPAC, now more than two years ago, this publicly funded university has devoted space on a homepage to denouncing me.
00:06:41.000And so the story, I find it kind of funny because it involves me personally.
00:06:45.000But this is a story for every normal minded person out there.
00:06:50.000No matter how degraded you think American higher education has become.
00:06:55.000No matter how degraded you think our political order has become.
00:07:01.000This is a taxpayer funded university in New York.
00:07:05.000And what message does this send to parents?
00:07:08.000If you don't want your child to be mutilated, to be told that he's the opposite sex?
00:07:13.000Well, I guess you have no place at the SUNY University of Buffalo.
00:07:18.000Well, this audience knows that I was kicked out of my sorority for being transphobic at the University of Chicago.
00:07:28.000So I guess we both have that shared scarlet letter.
00:07:30.000We have solidarity and being disavowed by higher education institutions, which I think is a badge of honor.
00:07:37.000But I want to sort of bring this full circle to another story that I saw in the news cycle that I'd love to get your take on, too.
00:07:42.000Of course, you know, the Democrats deal in projection.
00:07:45.000I always say they had the frickin' DNC in Chicago.
00:07:47.000They, of course, deal in the Alinsky rule of accusing the enemy of what you're guilty of.
00:07:51.000But I think it's quite ironic for them to be pushing all this, you know, book ban nonsense when it's just revealed yesterday in that statement,
00:07:58.000which we'll get into later in the show, that Zuckerberg put out, right?
00:08:02.000Saying that the White House was basically pressuring them into censoring stories about COVID-19,
00:08:07.000pressuring them to censor the Hunter Biden hard drive story.
00:08:11.000So it doesn't really seem to me that they take issue with banning or censorship, right?
00:08:15.000It's just about what exactly it is they're kind of issuing those censorship diktats on.
00:08:20.000I'm just curious to get your thoughts on the impetus behind Zuckerberg's letter and just sort of the broader implications there.
00:08:26.000Well, we have to take ourselves back to 2016 when the Democrats were convinced that there was a 99% chance that Hillary was going to win.
00:08:34.000And so they took their eye off the ball specifically on social media, which is effectively the public square right now.
00:08:40.000And the Trump campaign was excellent at social media and they were aggressive and they used it to their advantage.
00:08:47.000And they won and they weren't supposed to win.
00:08:50.000And so not that I have a great deal of sympathy for Mark Zuckerberg.
00:08:54.000In many ways, he's tried to flip and succeeded at flipping elections to Democrats.
00:08:59.000But in this case, I have a little bit of sympathy for him because he was caught holding the bag.
00:09:03.000Social media, especially Facebook, was caught holding the bag.
00:09:07.000And the Democrats blamed these big tech platforms for not doing enough to censor Trump in 2016, for not doing enough to censor from conservatives who supported Trump in 2016.
00:09:18.000So you saw in 2020, the government and the liberal Democrat apparatus really come down hard on the big tech platforms.
00:09:26.000So much so that the big tech platforms then suppressed even private messaging of the Hunter Biden laptop story.
00:09:32.000You had intelligence officials lying about the story as Russian disinformation.
00:09:37.000The government has admitted it's totally true.
00:09:39.000I think Zuckerberg is coming out right now and exposing some of this in part because he doesn't wanna take the heat.
00:09:46.000Whatever happens in November, he's going to receive some blame for it because a handful of oligarchs in Silicon Valley control the public square in a republic where speech is politics.
00:09:57.000So I think this is really a defensive measure because no matter what happens, but especially if Trump wins again, they are going to be coming for Zuckerberg's head.
00:10:07.000And speaking of projection, of course, there's ongoing back and forth about debates between Kamala and the Trump team.
00:10:14.000Now it's seeming that Harris, of course, the stellar debater, she's demanding that she be able to have notes and muted mics and all these special privileges and preferences and priorities.
00:10:24.000Although I get why she would be scared to debate Donald Trump.
00:10:27.000But your kind of assessment, your analysis, if you think the debate is A, going to actually happen, and just the optics of it, how you think it'll come together.
00:10:36.000It'll happen, but I love everything that Trump is doing in the lead up because when he says he might not debate, then he proposes these other debates that she's running away from, and then he points out the rule changes.
00:10:47.000This is all negotiation, this is all the art of the deal, and it's shifting the narrative.
00:10:51.000Don't forget, at the outset of Kamala's takeover of the nomination, she demanded that Trump abide by the debate agreement that he'd come to with Joe Biden for her.
00:11:04.000So Donald Trump never came to an agreement with Kamala Harris.
00:11:09.000He came to an agreement with Joe Biden, the legitimate nominee of the Democrat Party.
00:11:14.000He beat him so badly in the first debate that Biden is no longer the nominee of the party.
00:11:19.000And Kamala said, okay, well, we want you to respect the things that you agreed to with Biden when it comes to us.
00:11:24.000And Trump said, well, that's kind of silly.
00:11:27.000I never agreed to anything with you, but okay, fine, I'll do that.
00:11:30.000And then five seconds later, Kamala says, well, except for this rule, and except for this rule, and except for this thing that might disadvantage me.
00:11:36.000And so she's trying to have her cake and eat it too.
00:11:40.000She's only agreed to debate on ABC because ABC is so egregiously in her camp.
00:11:46.000The chief journalist over there in politics is George Stephanopoulos, who was the chief propagandist for the Democrats in the White House for Bill Clinton, who apparently one of Kamala's close friends is helping to run ABC News.
00:11:59.000And so she feels that she's gonna get every advantage there, and she's still trying to get more advantage.
00:12:04.000I suspect that Trump is going to debate regardless because he can beat her.
00:12:09.000He's just simply a much better debater than she is.
00:12:24.000And that narrative happens to be true.
00:12:26.000Yeah, I think if you can't handle Fox and you need to bring notes to a debate, you're probably not gonna do too well going up against foreign meetings, whether it's the moles in Iran, the Chinese Communist Party, the oligarchs in Ukraine, what's going on in the Middle East.
00:16:27.000This is the special counsel's effort to get this case back on the road toward trial.
00:16:31.000This is the January 6 federal election case in court in Washington, D.C. against Donald Trump.
00:16:37.000The charges, the four charges that Donald Trump has been facing for quite some time now,
00:16:42.000they're the same in this, what's called a superseding indictment.
00:16:46.000So a rewritten version of the criminal charges against the former president for conspiracy
00:16:51.000and other counts related to what he did after the 2020 election.
00:16:55.000But what the special counsel's office is saying they're doing here is they needed to go back to the grand jury, Phil,
00:17:02.000and rewrite those charges so that they would incorporate what they need to say that's in line with what the Supreme Court told them they must do.
00:17:10.000Remember, the Supreme Court just in June made that decision on presidential immunity,
00:17:16.000saying that some of the things in this case had to be cut out, such as things that were allegations that may be part of Donald Trump's official duties as president,
00:17:26.000especially his interactions with others below him in the administration.
00:17:30.000So I'm still going through the superseding indictment documents that we have.
00:18:39.000please translate it to the actual truth and reality of what's going on here.
00:18:44.000So Jack Smith has become the Freddy Krueger of this lawfare against President Trump.
00:18:51.000He keeps getting destroyed and coming back to life.
00:18:55.000This is like Freddy Krueger part six with Jack Smith.
00:18:59.000Look, the Supreme Court has already ruled in the Fisher decision that the Biden Kamala Justice Department illegally politicized,
00:19:11.000weaponized, contorted a post Enron obstruction of justice statute to go after corporate fraud that Biden and Kamala used to go after their political enemies.
00:19:22.000Those are two of the four charges to the two of the four counts in this superseding indictment like before.
00:19:29.000So Jack Smith still included these obstruction charges that the Supreme Court said are bogus.
00:19:37.000Right. Jack Smith is going to face another hurdle, which is presidential immunity.
00:19:42.000Jack Smith filed this superseding indictments.
00:19:45.000President Trump presumably will move to get moved to get rid of these charges again under presidential immunity.
00:19:54.000And then I think this goes back to D.C. Obama judge Tanya Shutkin.
00:19:59.000And she's going to have to decide what what President Trump did in his official capacity and the outer perimeter of his official capacity under the Nixon case.
00:20:10.000That decision is immediately appealable to the D.C. Circuit.
00:20:17.000That decision is appealable if the Supreme Court decides to take it to the Supreme Court of the United States.
00:20:23.000The bottom line is there's no chance in hell that President Trump is going to be tried before the election.
00:20:29.000Presumably Trump's going to win so long as his supporters get out and vote as early as possible and not wait till Election Day.
00:20:36.000And then I hope and I will push President Trump on day one to fire Jack Smith and to open a probe on Jack Smith for this obvious criminal conspiracy against President Trump to violate his constitutional rights.
00:20:51.000One of the charges that's in this indictment against Trump.
00:20:54.000So what do you make of the timeline of this case?
00:20:58.000And if you think it doesn't really have any merit, you know, why are they even bringing it?
00:21:02.000Is it something that they're more concerned about the court of public opinion or what sort of the driving factor here?
00:21:07.000It's it's obvious Biden Kamala Democrat lawfare and election interference.
00:21:13.000What I think Jack Smith is trying to do is get Tanya Shuck and D.C. Obama judge Tanya Shuck in a total partisan hack who just got reversed by the Supreme Court on presidential immunity.
00:21:25.000I think they're going to try to rush and have a mini trial and evidentiary hearing on presidential immunity between now and the presidential election.
00:21:34.000I think Jack Smith, that's the goal is to interfere in the election with this mini trial on presidential immunity because Jack Smith has to know that he's not going to be able to try Trump before the election.
00:21:46.000So this is Freddy Krueger, Jack Smith's last attempt to try to take out Trump before the presidential election.
00:21:55.000And, of course, House Republicans have done virtually nothing.
00:21:58.000I know we may disagree a little bit there to help combat this.
00:22:01.000But, Mike Davis, if people want to follow you, support what you guys got going on at the Article III Project, where can they go to do all that?
00:22:08.000Well, I'd say House Republicans have done a lot.
00:22:38.000Now, Warren Posse, I want to walk you guys through this Mark Zuckerberg letter because, like I said, I think there are a lot of smoke signals contained in this letter that we should not merely applaud and say, oh, this is so great.
00:22:50.000Mark Zuckerberg has certainly come around.
00:23:02.000And, frankly, even if that were, even if Mark Zuckerberg had had his red pill moment where he suddenly reversed course on all the horrible policy decisions that Meta has been plaguing this country with for years, over a decade.
00:23:15.000Why would he do it now after the Telegram CEO was just arrested in Paris?
00:23:22.000And why would he do it, as Mike Davis just discussed a few minutes ago, when the Biden regime is cracking down on anyone and everyone who dares to express anything short of fealty to them?
00:23:33.000Especially when it comes to issues that are so sensitive as censorship and the Praetorian Guard that they have set up to run cover, not just for Hunter Biden, but for the entire scam that they have up going on at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
00:23:45.000Now, there are some buried leads, I think, in this article that is important to go through.
00:23:50.000I encourage everyone to actually read the statement that Mark Zuckerberg put out.
00:23:56.000When they talk about COVID-19, they don't actually specify if they're talking about origins of COVID-19 stories, mask mandates, the efficacy of vaccines, right?
00:24:07.000It's just sort of a limited hangout in the sense that they think, well, if we just say COVID-19, we'll let them take that as whatever they may think it may be.
00:24:16.000They'll give us the most meaningful and, I think, gracious interpretation of that as possible.
00:24:21.000But in reality, I don't see anything in this letter coming down, cracking down, specifically about what they did on COVID-19 vaccines or the efficacy of mask mandates.
00:24:30.000Now, the other interesting thing, they, of course, get into the Hunter Biden hard drive.
00:24:34.000That's sort of the third paragraph in the letter.
00:24:37.000But there's nothing about the censorship of the 2020 stolen election.
00:24:42.000There's nothing about people who I'm sure, you guys in this audience, your accounts that were banned, censored, basically unpersoned for daring to question the integrity of the 2020 election results.
00:24:55.000Absolutely nothing in there about that.
00:24:57.000And that leads me to, I think, my point, which is this letter, which I think is a similar tactic we've seen, whether it's with the pandemic preparedness guys like Peter Dorschach at EcoHealth Alliance, trying to make an example out of people like him.
00:25:09.000Whether when they started to wheel out, whether it was, you know, Chris Cuomo or Dr. Ashish Jha, Biden's COVID-19 response coordinator on the media saying, oh, actually, we're going to take your COVID-19 vaccine claims seriously.
00:25:20.000I'm sure just in time for the next pandemic.
00:25:22.000Oh, wait, we just had new COVID boosters announced yesterday.
00:25:26.000But it's very interesting because I think this article lays the predicate for Facebook to now say, what do you mean?
00:25:31.000The way we're censoring stuff is in line with the First Amendment.
00:25:35.000We're not coordinating with the government.
00:25:37.000In reality, it's projection because I bet the Biden regime is already relaunching and re-upping their efforts, reaching out to Meta and every other social media platform to get ready to crack down ahead of the 2024 election.
00:25:47.000That's why they don't explicitly mention it in this article.
00:25:49.000And that's why they're putting, this letter rather, and that's why they put out this letter in the first place.
00:25:55.000They're slowly anesthetizing us to the crimes, the crimes, I use that word intentionally, that they committed in 2020, trying to do a little bit of a mea culpa, a little bit of a limited hangout.
00:26:06.000And I think the other buried lead and almost the more concerning thing that even if you take this letter at face value, you guys know that Meta, Facebook, Instagram, all these platforms, they are the bread and butter of human traffickers and especially illegal border smugglers.
00:26:20.000This is how they coordinated, that and TikTok, but we're focusing on Meta right now.
00:26:23.000You're telling me that the White House has time to reach out and censor stories about COVID-19, vaccines, mandates, or the origins of it, but they don't care and they're turning a blind eye to human trafficking and the facilitation of sex trafficking of minors across the southern border?
00:26:40.000Because that's essentially, if you take this letter at face value, that's what it means.
00:26:44.000The White House has enough resources and time to put together, compile people to make sure that you're censored for saying the COVID-19 vaccine didn't work.
00:26:51.000But they don't care enough to do anything about human trafficking, which I guess is fitting for the Biden regime.
00:26:56.000They were after all the ones who erased the DOJ's kind of subheading and subsection on combating child trafficking, as I reported a few years ago.
00:27:06.000But I think this letter is actually very concerning because they're laying the predicate that Facebook censorship should not be viewed as something that is inherently political.
00:27:15.000So when they start cracking down on your posts about the 2024 election, they will point to this letter and say, look, we disavowed.
00:27:21.000We're not working with the White House anymore.
00:27:23.000This is coming uniquely and organically from us.
00:29:31.000Welcome back to The War Room, where we are evolving, because you can't just go to birchgold.com slash Bannon.
00:29:41.000I'm seeing now that you can text Bannon to 989898 to get access to birchgold and all their wonderful experts and learn why gold and silver have always been a hedge against inflation and price controls and all these crazy policies that Kamala Harris, not even that they secretly want to roll out, but that they're admitting in the open.
00:29:59.000So you can only imagine how much more radical the policies are going to be behind closed doors.
00:30:03.000But just to conclude my thoughts before we bring our next guest on on this Mark Zuckerberg letter, because like I said, this is very important because it is not even a smoke signal.
00:30:12.000It is an in-your-face sign that they're getting ready to do this again ahead of the 2024 election.
00:30:18.000This is how dumb, and I use that word in the most intellectual way possible, House Republicans are, tweeting out,
00:30:25.000Mark Zuckerberg just admitted three things.
00:30:29.000Biden-Harris admin pressured Facebook to censor Americans.
00:30:55.000If Mark Zuckerberg actually colluded with the federal government to deprive American citizens of their First Amendment rights, that's crime.
00:31:02.000And you should be treated accordingly.
00:31:05.000You shouldn't get a free pass with a weekly worded letter that I would say at best is an opening bid that you can beg for our forgiveness, but you're not going to get it.
00:31:16.000There are lasting ramifications for the debates that you stifled and censored intentionally, might I add.
00:31:22.000And I'm sure all the crazy woke engineers that you enjoy, that you employ at Facebook, they would have done it, okay, even without the urging or demanding from the Biden White House.
00:31:31.000So I get it, you're trying to pass the blame, but I think the question is why you're trying to pass the blame right now.
00:31:36.000And it makes no sense in coordination with what happened with Pavel Durov, right, why you'd be sticking your neck out and going against a regime that just re-upped a superseding indictment against President Trump.
00:31:46.000But the most important part of this letter is the last paragraph, where Zuckerberg gets into the 2020 election spending.
00:32:03.000So you want to pump nearly $1 billion into our election administration and you think the best apology, oh, sorry, that's hailed by House Republicans as a big win that you're going to give the American people?
00:32:18.000Is one, like, sixth grade level English paragraph apologizing?
00:32:35.000And by the way, the analyses that you're citing, you can't even put them in the paper, you can't even give us a footnote linking to any of this analysis?
00:32:46.000Because every analysis, every rundown of the hundreds of millions of dollars that you gave to groups that have just rebranded and are still at work in the 2024 election, they all went to Democratic districts.
00:32:58.000And I'm not even talking like a plurality or 60% or 70% or 80% or even 90%, I'm talking 99, in some cases 98%.
00:33:07.000So sorry, House Republicans, it's not a big win that Mark Zuckerberg gave us a low class, by the way, the last paragraph, so you can see how important that was, mention, saying, yeah, sorry, I rigged the 2020 election.
00:33:23.000I don't want to look like I have partisan politics.
00:33:26.000And of course, House Republicans would hail it as a big win, because you guys have done absolutely nothing on any front, not even talking the Biden impeachment inquiry.
00:33:35.000Stopped holding my breath a long time ago on that one.
00:33:38.000Absolutely shameful that they would call this a big win.
00:33:42.000It's not a big win until Mark Zuckerberg is in jail, along with all these other tech CEOs who have deprived you of your First Amendment rights on a myriad and litany of issues that aren't included in this letter.
00:33:55.000So no offense, not a big win, maybe for the tech lobbyists in D.C., but short of that, I don't think it's a big win for the American people, Jim Jordan, respectfully.
00:34:05.000Now, to move on to something that also gets me equally passionate, which is, of course, the just decimation of American manufacturing jobs intentionally by design.
00:34:16.000Someone who saw that up close and personal is, of course, Joanna Miller.
00:34:19.000She worked very closely with Peter Navarro in the White House.
00:34:22.000Now, Joanna, you sort of brought to my attention that there's some collusion going on between Mexico.
00:34:26.000Of course, the Chinese are always in on it.
00:34:28.000But trying to take even more factory jobs away from American workers in the Biden White House, the regime is just basically writing carte blanche checks to let them do whatever they want.
00:34:36.000Can you walk the audience through the latest on the kind of domestic policy, domestic manufacturing front?
00:34:41.000Natalie, first of all, I'd never want to get on your bad side after that monologue.
00:35:12.000And you, as a China expert, know when China arrives in any country and starts building industrial parks and setting up shop, they bring their workers there.
00:35:21.000They use all Chinese workers and they do nothing for the local economies.
00:35:25.000And because China is setting up in Mexico, they are fully in compliance with the United States-Mexico-Canada trade agreement that President Trump established during his term.
00:35:35.000And they can freely export goods to the United States.
00:35:39.000And this is stuff like construction equipment, furniture, and even steel.
00:35:44.000Both Mexican companies and Chinese companies have been illegally dumping steel into the United States.
00:35:50.000And we have steel companies like Zeckelman Industries, one of the largest privately owned steel companies in the US.
00:35:56.000They just shut down in Long Beach, California.
00:36:01.000China was caught by Biden's Department of Commerce for ripping the steel workers off on trade and dumping steel into the United States at unfair prices.
00:36:12.000And they put Wyarton, Cleveland Cliffs steel out of business in West Virginia.
00:36:17.000Biden's Commerce Department caught this activity.
00:36:20.000The US International Trade Commission court shut it down and said, nope, we're not going to actually allow tariffs to be invoked on China for this.
00:36:28.000And guess what? Biden did nothing about it.
00:36:31.000Biden most recently had a nice little chat with Mexico saying, hey, listen, you should limit your exports to the United States.
00:37:00.000And it's only going to get worse if we elect Kamala Harris and Tim Walls with all of their China connections.
00:37:06.000Yeah, and I mean, all the companies, especially the American automobile ones that Hunter Biden was involved in negotiating the mergers and acquisitions with, they all outsourced the jobs to China.
00:37:16.000I think it was Avic Industries, right?
00:37:18.000It's par for the course with that family.
00:37:20.000But I'm just curious how you think that plays more broadly with the economy.
00:37:23.000Obviously, the Harris team is trying to do a rebrand, acting like they're all America first when it comes to anything fiscal policy.
00:37:30.000Of course, I don't think people will buy it.
00:37:32.000But can you just give us some kind of more examples, maybe drill down on that Pittsburgh example a bit more, just how backwards their policies truly are?
00:37:40.000Well, absolutely. You know, these policies, the radical Green New Deal agenda is sending inflation through the roof.
00:37:47.000And if you do a quick Google, you know, manufacturing plants that are shutting down in X state, it doesn't take long to find out that each state has tons of manufacturing and energy companies that are going out of commission.
00:37:58.000This is affecting our coal plants. By 2026, we're expected to lose half of our coal power generating capacity while China's building a coal plant every day, it seems like.
00:38:09.000And if you look at the recent jobs report, there were about a million jobs that never existed in the economy.
00:38:15.000If you put that in, there's a downward adjustment of 115,000 manufacturing jobs. Manufacturing companies typically employ about 200 workers each.
00:38:25.000So that's about 460 companies worth of jobs that just didn't exist, apparently, in the last year.
00:38:31.000And it's just telling of what the future will bring if we elect Kamala Harris and Tim Walz.
00:38:37.000They have globalist trade policies. They've got sketchy allegiances to China. More jobs are gonna be shipped overseas.
00:38:43.000And countries like Mexico and China are gonna continue to cheat on trade without fear of ramification for what it's gonna do to our relationship, to our mutual U.S. and whatever country trade relationship.
00:38:55.000Because Kamala Harris is doing nothing about it. There has not been a national security review of the plant being set up in Pittsburgh. How is that even possible?
00:39:05.000The Chinese Communist Party is taking over our steel industry, which we use for our military. Steel is used for our border wall.
00:39:12.000And we're allowing it to happen on our home turf, and it's completely unacceptable.
00:39:16.000And when President Trump comes back, we're gonna invoke universal baseline tariffs, we're gonna attract domestic investment in our manufacturing industry,
00:39:23.000And we're gonna make sure that our factories stay here in America for our national security and economic prosperity.
00:39:28.000And walk us through. I mean, I always say food security is national security, too.
00:39:33.000But there's some new data coming out of agricultural economists saying that over half the numbers are insane.
00:39:39.000Farmers feel like we're already in a recession or barreling towards one.
00:39:43.000Can you walk us through how that sector has been plagued by similarly abysmal policies, too?
00:39:48.000Absolutely. Well, if you look at Virginia, one of our largest agriculture producing states, Tyson Foods, which we see in our grocery stores, just shut down its largest poultry processing facility in Virginia.
00:40:00.000They laid off 700 workers. What's the definition of a recession? A decline in economic activity over a given period of time.
00:40:08.000And especially looking at indicators like GDP and production. Our production of agriculture is declining all over the place.
00:40:15.000Pork production and the pork industry had its lowest profits in about 20 years. How's that even possible?
00:40:22.000The agriculture industry is suffering. And going back to the Tyson Foods example, the Virginia state government has had to set up a new financial incentive program for Virginia's farmers because they can't sell to Tyson Foods anymore.
00:40:36.000These plant closures are affecting everybody. And it's not just metal manufacturing steel workers. It's our food. It's our agriculture processors. So this this economy is tanking and Kamala Harris is absolutely responsible.
00:40:51.000But if we get to the ballot box, we elect Donald Trump, we secure our elections, we are going to rescue all these industries and make sure they are made great again.
00:40:58.000And Trump's track record on all these issues, whether it's trade, China, I mean, it's it's unparalleled.
00:41:06.000But like I was saying, you worked with Peter Navarro. You were in the room and a lot of these policies were being crafted.
00:41:12.000You know, make your case for why you think President Trump is is able to reverse what is this?
00:41:20.000I think that's the stage we're at that we've witnessed under Kamala and Joe.
00:41:25.000Absolutely. Well, if you look at President Trump's tariffs, Kamala Harris is branding them as Trump taxes.
00:41:30.000When did we ever complain about inflation during the Trump administration when we had tariffs on three hundred and fifty billion dollars worth of Chinese goods?
00:41:39.000Trump is the blue collar billionaire. He has an ability to understand why an industrial base is vital for economic and national security.
00:41:47.000Our military got the largest contract ever to make sure that we were battle ready, but not entering foreign wars.
00:41:54.000We had a strong leader who cared about our industrial base and our tariffs produced billions in domestic investment.
00:42:01.000Ford and General Motors, they were expanding rapidly in places like Michigan.
00:42:06.000We're going to make sure that happens once again and prevent companies like Ford, who is now leaving the country and going to set up shop in Mexico.
00:42:15.000It's going to be unacceptable, just as President Trump did before our steel industry.
00:42:19.000President Trump was the only president in decades to create thousands of steel jobs.
00:42:24.000Biden is tanking the steel industry again.
00:42:26.000And many presidents before President Trump, there was like a downward progression in steel production.
00:42:32.000So we're going to make sure that happens once again and reinstate all of President Trump's Buy American policies.
00:42:38.000Joanna, if people want to follow you, check out everything you're working on.
00:43:18.000I guess that's what America last policy looks like in the flesh.
00:43:22.000We'll be right back after this short break.
00:43:24.000I want to warn you of a huge change that could be coming to our money in our bank accounts.
00:43:31.000First, think back to 9-11 shortly after the government pushed through the Patriot Act.
00:43:36.000This gave the government power to spy on innocent Americans by monitoring our phone and email and tracking our movement across the Internet.
00:43:44.000Now, Jim Rickards, editor of the independent financial newsletter Strategic Intelligence and New York Times bestselling author,
00:43:51.000is warning about a coming event that could elevate this governmental surveillance to a terrifying new level.
00:43:57.000In fact, some of the guests I've had on The War Room believe that the government will soon expand their powers to track our every move.
00:44:05.000If we say the wrong things on social media, donate to the wrong causes, buy firearms, or even vote MAGA,
00:44:12.000the government may be able to shut us out of our bank accounts.
00:44:16.000I can't say for sure if this will happen, but it's an interesting and dire warning.
00:44:22.000Fortunately, Jim Rickards, an American patriot and friend of mine, has made it his mission to educate us on what he believes is coming
00:44:29.000and how to protect yourself from the possibility of programmable money.
00:44:34.000Watch Jim's warning video now before it's censored like I've been in the past.
00:44:41.000That's RickardsWarRoom.com now to see the video.
00:44:45.000I guess as a follow up on Scott's question, you're sitting in these hearings with prosecutors and judges at the courthouse down the street.
00:44:52.000They're increasingly expressing concerns about the upcoming transfer of power and the potential danger of another January 6th.
00:45:03.000I think our prosecutions have made clear what we think about people who try to interfere with the peaceful transfer of power,
00:45:13.000which is an essential and fundamental element of our democracy.
00:45:17.000I quibble about whether we have 1,500 or slightly less than 1,500, but we have way more than 1,400 now prosecutions,
00:45:26.000and we have a substantial number of convictions.
00:45:28.000I think that's shown to everybody how seriously we take an effort to interfere with the peaceful transfer of power.
00:45:35.000The last January 6th, the coming January 6th, and every January 6th after that.
00:45:41.000I want to make clear to anybody who is thinking about interfering with that, they can see what we've done with respect to the January 6th prosecutions,
00:45:49.000and the Justice Department will continue to protect our democracy.
00:45:54.000They're getting ready, they're gearing up to do what they did for the 2020 election in 2024.
00:45:59.000I think that dovetails quite nicely with the ominous warning I gave you about that Zuckerberg letter.
00:46:04.000They're getting their censorship and, of course, their domestic lawfare apparatus in place and ready to roll out.
00:46:10.000And someone who's been on the receiving end of that, not just Stephen K. Bannon or Peter Navarro,
00:46:14.000is Jeff Clark, who joins us by phone now, who was removed as a co-conspirator, I gather, from the superseding indictment.
00:46:21.000Jeff, if you want to sort of walk the audience through, first of all, just what that means generally,
00:52:49.000I'm one of the co-creators of Sacred Human.
00:52:52.000And I wanted to share just a little bit more about our brand for those who may not know of us yet.
00:52:56.000But about six months ago, we decided to launch Sacred Human with really the simple mission being to provide American-made natural supplements without all the artificial nonsense.
00:53:07.000So unfortunately, as many of you know, a lot of these big corporate supplements will include things like preservatives, artificial ingredients, and other additives that really aren't benefiting your health.
00:53:18.000So that's why we created Sacred Human, really trying to fill this gap of quality supplements, and of course the beef liver being our flagship products.
00:53:26.000For those who don't know, beef liver is loaded with highly bioavailable ingredients such as vitamin A, B12, zinc, CoQ10, etc.
00:53:36.000And because it is 100% grass-fed and natural, your body is able to absorb these nutrients far better than taking any other synthetic multivitamin or any other synthetic vitamin in general.
00:53:48.000So we have some other amazing products, but if you'd like to check us out, you can go to sacredhumanhealth.com.