00:00:00.000happening now, Bernie, Bannon, both fighting for a common goal, keeping humans in control
00:00:05.900and better protections against artificial intelligence. Senator Bernie Sanders and
00:00:11.000Steve Bannon, just some of the odd alliances gathering in the nation's capital all day today
00:00:15.540at an event called the Pro-Human Assembly. Other voices include conservative commentator Glenn
00:00:21.260Beck, actors Ashley Judd and Joseph Gordon-Levitt, and evangelical leader Walter Kim. They and more
00:00:28.300than a million others have endorsed what's known as the pro-human AI declaration. Among its demands,
00:00:34.680independent oversight of AI systems and no liability shields for AI companies.
00:00:40.460They say their call to action is as urgent as ever. What was happening? This past 72 hours
00:00:48.780or four or five days should show you, right, and exemplify to those people what their fear is.
00:00:58.040We've had all these, as we've said for years and years and years, all these revelations about the labs, about what they're working on, of what the youngest people there and their best people, what they're afraid of.
00:01:13.720And then all of a sudden, out of nowhere, four, I think, or five of the oligarchs, they've got old-time religion.
00:01:22.180Now, they think, yeah, we really ought to have some control.
00:01:28.040That's a bald-faced lie. We have worked at War Room with Joe Allen to make sure
00:01:38.360that when they try to get AI amnesty last year twice, first in the big
00:01:43.640beautiful bill and second the NDA, it was defeated. It was defeated because of the
00:01:52.340people in the audience. This was a grassroots effort. Marsha Blackburn,
00:01:57.160Senator Blackburn, who talked earlier today, her bill, we defeated the AI amnesty 99 to 1 in the
00:02:04.740middle of the night. The arrogance of these individuals that they took the exact same AI
00:02:10.640amnesty and jammed it back into the NDA, and guess what? It was defeated. It didn't even come for a
00:02:15.420vote. It was pulled, I think, by the House Armed Services Committee, said we're not going to deal
00:02:19.920with this now, right? How did that happen? That was working class and middle class people that
00:02:27.420had enough of it. They said, look, we really don't understand AI. We're not doomers. We're
00:02:33.900Americans. We're optimistic. We think this could be a great technology, but we're not going to give
00:02:38.560these guys carte blanche. We're not going to do it. There's been no debate. We don't understand it.
00:06:27.040EJ, as I said, the the biggest acceleration is flipped in like 24 hours, I think, after the OpenAI public offering got pulled.
00:06:40.560But to be, hey, we're all open to we're all open for regulation.
00:06:46.120These are people that fought like wildcats to make sure that we can never, ever, ever, ever, ever have any controls.
00:06:53.980They completely flipped. But as we've seen from your analysis and others, one of the things they're trying to do is use that as, oh, yeah, you can come in like once every six months and check out what we're doing.
00:07:07.200But what they're really trying to do is is really regulatory control, right?
00:07:13.460Regulatory. This is a regulatory grab sort of creative moat around four or five of the biggest companies.
00:07:19.020E.J. and Tony. Steve, I think you absolutely hit the nail on the head there. And the parallel
00:07:25.840that I like to use here is Walmart and Amazon pushing for a higher minimum wage. And you have
00:07:32.280to ask, why would a huge corporate interest like that want a higher minimum wage? Why would they
00:07:37.540be pushing for legislation or regulation that's going to hurt their bottom line? It's because at
00:07:42.760the end of the day, it's not. Sure, there might be a short-term impact that's negative, but what's
00:07:47.420the long-term impact. The long-term impact is that the big box stores who have the margins to be able
00:07:52.820to pay their workers more will do so. And the small mom and pop shops who do not have those same
00:07:58.780fat margins, they will be unable to. They go out of business, and their market share then gets
00:08:04.400captured by the big box stores. That is why you see this kind of regulatory capture, this
00:08:10.640corporate cronyism is really what it is. And again, it's not always in the form of a
00:08:17.080corporation going to Washington and saying, please give us a tax break. Sometimes it's like
00:08:21.960this. It's in the form of a negative that, yes, it's going to hurt everybody in the industry,
00:08:26.680but it doesn't hurt everybody equally. And again, by hurting their competitors more and by setting
00:08:32.100up a regulatory framework that then, as you said, creates this moat around them so that competition
00:08:38.020can't get in, you have those barriers to entry, as we like to say, that is just a way to protect
00:08:43.620their market share, not protect the American consumer. And I think another piece of evidence
00:08:49.360here, Steve, is that when you look at companies like OpenAI, like Anthropic, and you look at the
00:08:54.840different people that they want to do the regulation, because let's not forget, they are
00:08:58.800asking for these so-called third parties to come in and do the regulation as opposed to actual
00:09:05.840regulators or actual legislators. They want these third parties to come in. Who are the third
00:09:11.640parties, they're all people, no coincidence here, who have financial connections to the AI companies
00:09:18.580themselves. Is anyone surprised that OpenAI is advocating for folks to do the regulating who are
00:09:25.380also tied to OpenAI? This is the fox guarding the hen house in a certain way, right? This is the
00:09:32.560equivalent to the wolves going to the shepherd and saying, Mr. Shepherd, you are losing an awful lot
00:09:37.700of sheep to us wolves. Why don't you allow us wolves to protect your sheep? What on earth do
00:09:42.820you think that's going to do in terms of result? Again, what the AI companies want, I'm not talking
00:09:47.600about what you and I want, what the American people want. What the AI companies want at this
00:09:52.300stage is to keep out cheaper competition. And that's the crux of the matter. You have a lot
00:09:57.640of these companies that are built on very high, their models are very, very expensive to run.
00:10:03.180The token costs are incredibly high, and you are seeing now cheaper competition, both foreign and domestic, who are coming in and stand to crush some of these big names right now.
00:10:14.460And so, again, what these companies want at the end of the day, Steve, the first part is that regulatory capture.
00:10:21.380It's to regulate all that cheaper competition out of business.
00:10:24.920And then the second thing is to create, I think you've mentioned this previously, is to create a kind of too big to fail, just like we did with so many of the banks after 2007, 8, and 9, right?
00:10:36.720And again, on both ends of that, the American people lose.
00:10:40.540The American people lose from the fact that you're going to have to pay more for any of these AI services, which are now everywhere, or it's only going to grow the areas of our lives in which we utilize AI.
00:10:51.840You're going to have to pay more for those services because of that lack of competition from that regulatory capture.
00:10:57.580And then if, heaven forbid, these AI companies aren't ever able to actually deliver on their promises in terms of the levels of profits that they're forecasting in the future, if these stock prices are not ultimately justified by future earnings, you better believe that some of these firms are going to be coming back to Congress and asking for bailouts at that point.
00:11:19.100neither of those two things serve the american people neither of those two things should happen
00:11:23.720here's the tell these folks fought any time if you had even mentioned anything about controls
00:11:33.040or oversights you were decelerationists they were all accelerationists and then they had
00:11:37.440these revelations which by the way did not go through the corporate chain of command these
00:11:42.560these are whistleblowers young people in these some of the best and brave that they've got they're
00:11:47.080in these uh safety uh you know departments they start blowing the whistle they've used this they
00:11:54.240have no intention of sitting there and allowing i mean they've thrown out oh we're going to have
00:11:58.720let a human observer come in every now and again they have no intention whatsoever of having any
00:12:05.320real regulation on the dangers of their operations and particularly as a hurdle towards agi but what
00:12:12.540they're trying to do is do this kind of shift of liabilities and set it up as too big to fail.
00:12:17.780They're looking for bailouts down the road and they're trying to shift liabilities now. EJ,
00:12:22.800how do we counter this? Steve, I think there's two things. Number one is free market capitalism.
00:12:30.260In other words, it's not a matter of protecting certain companies. It's a matter of allowing
00:12:36.820the best companies, the most efficient companies to be the ones that survive. And you are going to
00:12:42.380need these businesses, right? These are the new arms manufacturers. I wish that wasn't the case,
00:12:47.280but it is the case, okay? If we just slam the brakes on AI and we say, forget it,
00:12:52.880no more of this technology, scrap it all, you know who's not going to do that is the Chinese0.98
00:12:58.040Communist Party. And we have to win this arms race against the Chinese Communist Party.0.91
00:13:02.520What would have happened if the United States did not have nuclear weapons? If we had allowed,0.86
00:13:07.800heaven forbid, the Nazis to get them, heaven forbid, the Soviets to get them,0.90
00:13:11.280Not only would World War II have turned out very different, but the post-war world would0.80
00:13:30.460And that's, I think, a very important qualifier, right?
00:13:33.220We're not talking about regulation that protects corporate interests.
00:13:37.320We're talking about regulations that protect the American people.
00:13:40.860I think that's a pretty reasonable stance. Again, we're not asking for regulation that is going to smother this novel technology in its crib. That's not what we're asking for. And we're not asking for regulation that is only going to serve a small group of people, some special interests. We are asking for some basic regulation that essentially meets that consumer welfare standard.
00:14:07.180EJ where do people go your Twitter particularly you're you're informing and teaching people 24
00:14:15.0007 you got some great stuff up on this AI where they go best place to find me is on x the handle
00:14:20.900there is at real EJ and Tony EJ fantastic job thank you sir thank you Steve appreciate you
00:14:29.580we're going to play uh the Charlie Kirk song from Natasha Owens number 25 on the billboard
00:14:36.800charts of the top 200 songs in the world pretty amazing also the uh our song never forget about
00:14:43.5209 11 take your phone at text bannon b-a-n-n-o-n 98 98 98 the ultimate guide for investing in gold
00:14:51.900and precious metals in the age of trump and you get to talk to philip patrick and his team
00:14:58.220short break you don't wait until your house is on fire to install a smoke detector and you don't
00:15:04.140wait until the wind and rain hammer your windows and the power goes out to prepare for a hurricane
00:15:10.680and you don't reach for your seat belt after the impact because after the crash the hurricane or
00:15:17.100the house fire it's too late similarly you don't wait until the dollar goes to zero before you buy
00:15:23.480gold it's too late then diversify with precious metals and diversify now because you never know
00:15:30.460what will threaten your savings next persistent inflation a weakening dollar unexpected financial
00:15:36.600disruptions you don't know what's coming but you can take preventative steps and you can take
00:15:41.740them today do that right now by requesting a free information kit on gold from my friends
00:15:47.540at birch gold group just text my name bannon b-a-n-n-o-n to the number 9-8-9-8-9-8 there
00:15:55.000is no cost and no obligation just straightforward information on how you can diversify your savings
00:20:34.460Well, look, Steve, if you look at this same crowd of people who are busy telling us that we need to take the Chinese Communist Party seriously, where have they been for, I would argue, decades, but certainly the last half a decade where we've been saying that we've been called crazy conspiracy theorists.
00:20:56.220And in the same breath, right, with which they're telling us that the reason why we need to accelerate AI to the nth degree, which there's an interesting convergence there because essentially what they're advocating for is accelerating Chinese AI.
00:21:08.400The guardrails that they want aren't even effective, right?
00:21:10.440Just look at the, you know, NVIDIA chip, that whole debacle there.
00:21:13.820But these people in the same breath are investing in Chinese companies.
00:21:17.300They've made absolutely no efforts to get Chinese companies delisted from the stock markets.
00:21:22.600Silicon Valley, Wall Street, take your pick.0.87
00:21:24.380they've basically helped pop up so many of these Chinese firms that are scams to begin with. Have0.96
00:21:29.500these people criticized Chinese manufacturing? Maybe now, but not when it was politically
00:21:33.860unpopular. Are these people upset about, you know, the 600,000 students? And Steve,
00:21:38.440here's the biggest tell. You know, I think China is probably one of those issues that is
00:21:42.860nominally bipartisan, right, on the Hill among Congress. But it's only bipartisan because it's
00:21:48.660agreed upon that they can invoke it as a threat to justify, right, it's a means to an end. That
00:21:53.920end is never actually taking on the Chinese Communist Party. It's extending the defense
00:21:57.500budget, but not actually in a meaningful way, just enriching the defense primes.
00:22:02.400But more to the point on this, it's only bipartisan because they're being funded by the same lobbyists,
00:22:08.360the same regulators. And I think in this case in particular, Steve, right, this same group of
00:22:13.000people, they are so hypocritical and the same breath in which, you know, we need to advance0.92
00:22:17.220AI to the point where it basically takes over this country. They're also totally OK with the0.99
00:22:21.960entire H-1B visa program, which is the second largest recipient, is literally Chinese nationals.
00:22:28.320So if AI is going to be this new national security buttress that we're going to have against
00:22:33.960PRC advancement, it doesn't really make sense to be importing their citizen fusion soldier types,
00:22:42.080of which we know they are here. Just look at the recent reporting. But Steve, it's even more
00:22:47.100nefarious than that. I mean, I broke, what was it? I think it was last year, the story about how
00:22:51.660our tax dollars were funding joint research between, you know, the U.S. Army, the National
00:22:59.040Institutes, not of health, but that kind of, you know, NAS, that consortium of groups and Chinese
00:23:04.500military institutions, right? Don't make any mistake that it's just the military research or
00:23:09.200some of the scientific stuff. We've helped a lot really boost their AI industry. So these people
00:23:15.840are clowns. And I would just say my last point, Steve, and I know we could probably talk about0.98
00:23:19.400this for several hours we could add a fifth hour of war room but mark zuckerberg david sachs you
00:23:26.740know all of these clowns who suddenly had a newfound they suddenly like aga right i'm sure
00:23:34.520it has nothing to do with the fact that we worked tooth and nail to take over the white house and0.91
00:23:38.460they just want to see their shares go up when those people say something do not believe them
00:23:43.720i understand mark zuckerberg right got rid of his fact checking unless they actually say they're
00:23:48.700sorry and they mean it, which they never will. They just try to obfuscate what they did wrong.
00:23:53.340It's not genuine. It never will be. These people are crazy. They're not just guided by the lust
00:23:58.380for money and corporate greed, but they care about control. And they think that our audience
00:24:05.800is so riled up about the PRC threat. It's frankly disgusting to, I think, water down and whitewash
00:24:12.020that threat and co-opt it for this purpose. Are these people clamoring about the defense
00:24:17.040industrial base being depleted? You know, no. So these people should not weigh in on the China
00:24:22.960issue. They don't know what they're talking about. And it's a weird angle to try to inflate
00:24:28.300their share value at the expense of our national security. Where do you think we are in this
00:24:32.600moment? You've seen the whistleblowing. There's obviously deep problems. The four guys come
00:24:38.180together over the weekend and say, hey, you know what? You're right. Maybe we do need some
00:24:42.740oversight let's think of some ideas uh at the same time if ej and tony and others they're getting
00:24:50.080people in there they're already trying to build the moat i mean what they're looking for is we
00:24:54.680fall into a trap of making them a cartel right with very little oversight and regulation and
00:25:00.360we've taken liabilities onto the american people and we've made some of them too big to fail because
00:25:05.400there's going to be a couple of financial catastrophes in these four or five uh frontier
00:25:10.400labs. Not all of them are going to make it, but all of them are going to do trillion dollar IPOs
00:25:14.200and borrow, you know, collectively a trillion dollars. Ma'am, your thoughts?
00:25:20.420You know, I would say, how about this, Steve? They can have no regulation whatsoever if they
00:25:25.880promise that all of their investors will never invest in a Chinese company again. They will0.92
00:25:31.100advocate and use the same lobbyist pressure to delist Chinese companies from the stock market.
00:25:36.060They will invest their proceeds, their shares to help bring manufacturing jobs to America.0.72
00:25:42.960And still I see a signed document saying that they're going to do that.0.82
00:25:47.180I will never believe them that they actually care about beating China.
00:25:51.140But I think this is such a complicated issue, Steve, too, because they're already sort of at the point where they've made these companies too big to fail, right?
00:25:56.960They're all signing these weird agreements between each other where the actual revenue is not really there to support it, but somehow the stock prices are inflamed.
00:26:06.060So much where it's like you kind of need them to stay there. Otherwise, you're going to see some sort of crash. You know, Steve, I would just say, again, this is out of my purview. I know it from the PRC angle, but this is all an information op. I mean, right. We hear focus on the lobbying registrations on people pushing narratives in the same way that they're having they're paying people to lobby on behalf of foreign governments and, you know, make whatever.
00:26:28.460everybody that you're seeing in your feed weighing in on this is not giving their honest actual take
00:26:34.380right there's a similar level info op going on here too um so i would just encourage people to
00:26:40.120be very steely-eyed when it comes to intaking everything that you are about this issue
00:26:43.780because they are trying to make you think that it's not as dangerous as it can be
00:26:47.820and the sort of cop-out issue way that they i'm sure have beta tested and used focus groups to
00:26:53.220try to sell MAGA on this is the China national security angle. Well, I'm pretty sure they tried
00:26:58.660to sell, you know, the Patriot Act with the national security stuff and all these random
00:27:02.180other, you know, weird defense budgets that the bloating going on over there in the name of
00:27:06.640defending against China. Like I said, sign an agreement that you'll put the profits towards
00:27:12.180actually taking down China and that maybe I'll believe you, but I don't think they will.0.87
00:27:16.980We don't need to chase AGI to defeat China. We can defeat China and we must defeat China. Just0.97
00:27:22.340shut it down yeah the ccp has no has zero artificial intelligence ecosystem unless we0.92
00:27:30.320provide it and of course the uh the um and you know navideas of the world are prepared to buy
00:27:38.840and to provide it this is why no chips no black market chips no access to chips
00:27:44.500chapter 845 war room they saved over a million bucks for the war and posse already plus they
00:27:52.260have you in optimum plans 845 war room a chapter talk to them about your medicare plan not only
00:28:00.180will they save you money they will get you into the optimum plan and what is a real rat's nest
00:29:06.940That's one word, allfamilypharmacy.com slash Bannon,
00:29:10.280and use promo code Bannon10 to save 10% on your order.
00:29:14.420That's allfamilypharmacy.com slash Bannon with code Bannon10.
00:29:18.880this is family owned, family operated. These people, Michael Kunzler and his team are
00:29:24.640absolutely terrific. Take advantage of this today. This Smithsonian has a lesson plan and
00:29:31.020professional development material package for K through 12 classrooms. We've mentioned this
00:29:36.300before, but this was first reported by Natalie Winters saying that the resources available for
00:29:41.940high school teachers across the nation include lessons on Islamophobia post 9-11 called
00:29:48.600belonging case study targeted at home one of the essential questions for high school students it
00:29:55.240says how have arguments about national identity security and patriotism been employed in the
00:30:01.360targeting and othering don't you love that word of americans from certain racial ethnic religious
00:30:07.260or linguistic identity groups i don't even know what that means
00:30:12.500natalie winters good name check walk us through that ma'am i'm still trying to figure out what a
00:30:19.980linguistic minority is and i think here in the war room we know what othering is maybe that's
00:30:25.300a good term to use for the censorship that we have faced um but look steve i was watching
00:30:30.380president trump's speech on 9-11 all the events going on and you had the brilliant analysis i had
00:30:37.700the same kind of outrage which is it seems like everybody is now calling this terrorism not
00:30:43.560islamic terrorism we've you know bypassed the obama era days where the debate used to be over
00:30:47.940radical islamic terrorism or just islamic terrorism let alone just calling it islam as they would
00:30:53.860write in the quran calling for violence um but this story i think is so emblematic of that and
00:31:00.100i think it is incumbent on the war room to sort of push back among that rhetorical war we're seeing
00:31:06.060go on, not just among Democrats, that goes by the wayside, but even among Republicans.
00:31:11.940If you can't call out 9-11 as Islamic terrorism, then it's probably going to be hard for you to0.74
00:31:16.900go after Sharia law. Let's take baby steps. But this story shows that the Smithsonian Museum,0.99
00:31:23.320the Museum of American History, if you can believe it, they have a special course for
00:31:28.780high schoolers and K-12. There's different materials. But their 9-11 programming for
00:31:35.660students, centers on learning about, quote, victims of Islamophobia, using materials from
00:31:43.520terrorist organization CARE, the Council on American Islamic Relations. And literally some
00:31:48.680of the required readings for it says that anti-Sharia laws here in the United States are,
00:31:54.720quote, disturbing. Linda Sarsour of Women's March fame and Rashida Tlaib are prominently profiled
00:32:01.500as you know rising muslim stars and the lesson is of course called quote targeted at home
00:32:07.540and it is designed to quote develop empathic attitudes toward the victims of islamophobia
00:32:13.840helping students identify stereotypes about muslims examine their harm and learn to debunk
00:32:20.000those stereotypes they're also learning how national identity security and patriotism have
00:32:25.500been weaponized as lauren grimm was saying and the targeting and othering of muslims my favorite
00:32:31.120quote in all of this material, and like I said, this is, you know, I was digging through what
00:32:35.360they're showing these students, is literally an article lamenting that there are laws going up
00:32:41.160at this point, it was a few years ago, in some, you know, couple dozen states against Sharia law.
00:32:48.140Now, they also quote a Vox article that it opens with, and this is a hot take, I think most
00:32:54.160Americans would probably disagree, though it is Vox, so I'd expect nothing less, which is
00:32:58.580September 11, 2001, is widely understood as a marker of deepening Islamophobia in America.
00:33:07.440No, I think that's understood as the day Muslims came home to the United States and attacked us,
00:33:14.940and our visa system was exploited in the day that we should have closed our doors to basically all Muslim refugees, immigrants, take your pick.0.99
00:33:23.240You can also see in one of the pictures there where they're talking about the concept of Tunis,0.90
00:33:28.580as in T.W.O., because, again, apparently after 9-11, the bigger threat there was proving that
00:33:34.920America was not an Islamophobic country towards a religion that has shown us virtually nothing
00:33:40.880but violence. And the quote here to get kids understanding what it's like to be Muslim in the
00:33:46.560United States was, he leaned against the subway doors in a faded denim jacket, camo, cargo pants,
00:33:52.420combat boots, and to top it off, a black ski mask. I wondered if he had a gun. I wondered if he was
00:33:57.100a white supremacist. I wonder if he had seen my friend in me with our brown skin and black hair,
00:34:01.940our Islamic faith and immigrant parents. Could he somehow see that too? Everything that I just
00:34:07.700went through is what the Smithsonian is teaching American students about 9-11. Like I said,
00:34:14.060this retrofitting. I mean, you see it with Momdani and AOC laughing. Honestly, one of the
00:34:19.840most disgusting moments I've seen on TV and shout out to Rav for getting that clip. But these people
00:34:25.800don't care. And what's worse, Steve, is that they're actually appropriating 9-11 into a way
00:34:34.000to make Americans kowtow and genuflect to the literal religion that caused that, not as some
00:34:41.220offshoot or secondary tertiary interpretation of the seminal book of that religion, but actually
00:34:47.480following through on what they are commanded to do. And you see it in the bending over, I would
00:34:53.340they continued kattowing primarily among the republican establishment bush etc who let these
00:34:59.720people in and mass post 9-11 and it is this weird i mean i struggle to understand it but moral
00:35:06.160inversion and tests where we have to prove that we are not islamophobic or we are not racist
00:35:12.460by destroying our own country by importing people who are so comfortable with telling us that they0.77
00:35:19.480hate us, and co-opting our institutions, whether it's the Girl Scouts, the Boy Scouts, the0.72
00:35:23.900Smithsonian, to preach to us about how intolerant we are.
00:35:47.780care offices in california you can now vote there in 2026 epic city remember that mosque that's also
00:35:55.760a voting location now not just the the compound that they tried to shut down but now and for the
00:36:01.440new york police department and a couple of other um you know institutions in new york uh mom donnie
00:36:07.620his you know mayor of inclusion or whatever ridiculous title they have for it they literally
00:36:12.700partnered with a group called the Muslim Community Network. You can imagine what they're advocating
00:36:19.340for, although you probably can't because it's so ridiculous. They actually were advocates0.78
00:36:23.880against the 9-11 museum because it, quote, perpetuated hate and demonized Islam and Muslims.
00:36:30.740But they're now getting taxpayer dollars to train the NYPD on how to counter Islamophobia,
00:36:37.540including but not limited to online islamophobic islamophobic posts i.e they're monitoring
00:36:44.920what you're saying about islam about muslims so again this is just one example but i think most
00:36:52.460of the audience and i feel like someone had to call it out it's not terrorism we had that word
00:36:56.940misappropriated when it came to january 6 this is what happens when the goodness of the american
00:37:02.560people, whether it's exploited on AI, immigration, illegal aliens, take your pick, Islam, we see the
00:37:09.120best in people. And it is thrown in our face. There was no better example of that than 9-11
00:37:15.180and the continued co-opting of that to push this narrative that Americans, it's not just that we
00:37:21.160are Islamophobic, but that we aren't allowed to be Islamophobic. Since I was in middle school,
00:37:25.660I have pushed back against the term Islamophobia because it's a justified fear. It's not irrational.0.98
00:37:31.020and the demographic shift since however many years ago that was has only proven my point.
00:37:36.180But this just shows you how deep this rot has gone. And it's disgusting. It's disgraceful0.58
00:37:41.440to the people who died on 9-11. But it's also going to collapse this country. I mean,
00:37:47.900you see it in Texas. You see it in all of these red states. And it's maddening to see. And I wish
00:37:53.560more Republicans would speak out about it rather than just hiding behind the veil of, oh, we don't0.95
00:37:57.860like Sharia law. Okay, good. I'm glad we've established that. Why don't you go after the0.94
00:38:01.560rank and file too? Let me talk about Smithsonian for a second. I think the head guy just got let
00:38:09.680go the other day, but from a great institution, that's really, you know, gone to completely woke
00:38:16.120total DEI. Was this in your investigation, was this the only or the major part of information
00:38:24.180they had out to teach these high school kids, because on 9-11, the New York Times huge article
00:38:31.320that day was how Islamophobia shaped a generation of young Muslims in the United States. They took
00:38:38.260it over 25 years. I mean, on the day of 9-11, the article didn't get into it all, that Islamic1.00
00:38:45.460jihadists were the ones, and the Saudi royal family, certain elements of it were the ones
00:38:52.380in back of this, but they talked about Islamophobia. In Smithsonian, did they have anything
00:38:59.100that actually talked about 9-11 and what actually happened, or was this the only offering it
00:39:04.480had? Well, this was their flagship lesson on 9-11. I'm sure they had other resources,
00:39:11.600but this is what they were pushing. This is what they had created videos for by like Marxist,
00:39:17.700jihadist people, the craziest of the crazies. The full article is on my substack. But see,
00:39:23.820this is obviously a theme throughout so many of the Smithsonian's programming. It's going back
00:39:27.420even to the BLM riots. They've always pushed the most radical of the radical, these sort of
00:39:32.780classroom fusions. I mean, heck, you walk by the Smithsonian, you see some of the exhibits they
00:39:38.400have. It is an effort to redefine America as anything except American. America is every other
00:39:45.360country except for america i mean it's it's ridiculous whether it's the exhibits they have
00:39:51.580going on um or the the classroom materials that they're pushing but steve i mean you're right
00:39:55.800whether it's the new york times all of these outlets their main profile pieces on 9-11 are
00:40:01.180literally about why we need to feel bad for the religion that caused this like it's crazy they
00:40:07.580want to make you scared to speak out about it right oh no i'm going to be called islamophobic0.99
00:40:11.860okay, well, I would rather go down in history as an Islamophobe than somebody who was part of a1.00
00:40:17.220culture and a civilization that was taken over by Islam and saw the percentage of mosques in her1.00
00:40:23.840country increase by thousands of percent. I think it's probably only at a few hundred now. But just0.65
00:40:29.900to link this too, Steve, real quick, and we can stay on this, but this idea of the foreign funding,
00:40:35.900This is not sporadic or organic or natural. I just published a story on my Substack talking about, I know he may be your guy now, but one of Bernie Sanders' former aides is busy just a few weeks ago co-hosting with a host of NGOs, these left-wing, save every illegal alien in the country ever, but hosting training camps with the Mexican consulate where they're working to actively
00:41:05.900subvert president trump's deportation agenda and help illegal aliens avoid being deported
00:41:11.660so make no mistake right that that article that you're seeing on the new york times yes the new0.99
00:41:16.180york times is woke and stupid but there's also foreign interest even i mean you think the saudis0.97
00:41:21.740and the qataris didn't get to president trump and you know that's why all of a sudden we see a0.98
00:41:26.040thawing of the rhetoric about it i certainly haven't taken saudi or qatar money and i will
00:46:46.800They're saying out in California, ma'am, that our Natalie may be a racist.
00:46:51.180What are these news sites that are doing this?
00:46:54.520I am under attack by California's black media enclave, apparently exposing taxpayer fraud makes you racist.0.92
00:47:05.200This is a story we broke on War Room, so hopefully you guys get some inbound, too.0.90
00:47:09.160But there's this ridiculous nonprofit, the Center for Anti-Racism and Trauma, where literally in one year they experienced a 2,700% increase in funding from the government.
00:53:10.060Every W-2, every 1099, every piece of tax information that's been reported to the government is sitting in what's called your IRS master file.
00:53:19.700The question is, do you know what's in it before you file your return?
00:53:24.040That's why I want you to check out our friends at Tax Network USA.
00:53:28.100They'll pull out your official IRS master file before your return is prepared so that you can see exactly what the IRS already has on the record.
00:53:38.280If you filed an October 15th extension, you can get your federal tax return repaired, plus your IRS file pulled for just $49.
00:53:48.900And if you're self-employed, receive 1099 income, or own a business, they'll review your IRS file and prepare your federal tax return for just $300.
00:53:59.560This special offer can save you hundreds of dollars while helping you file with confidence before the extension deadline.