00:01:20.220And all I can imagine is like the Zoomer that they now pay to write these articles doesn't actually know.
00:01:28.120Actually, the first thing that comes to mind is what you were just saying off mic a second ago about like a crisis driving out good people.
00:01:36.680Like, oh, I mean, the quality of the reporting has really gone down.
00:01:39.800They really do have a bunch of like popped up Zoomers writing articles at these fucking these big institutional journals now.
00:01:45.900THE INTERNET HAS TAKEN NOTICE, AND NOW THERE'S A NEW MEME OUT0.98
00:01:50.440THERE KNOWN AS DARK BRANDON, WHICH SHOWS A BAD-ASS BIDEN
00:06:23.280In that several years, if anything goes up, I'm hoping it won't.
00:06:26.440It's been more than 48 hours since Project Veritas published undercover videos of a Pfizer executive talking about his company's secret plan to mutate coronaviruses, make them much more dangerous on purpose.
00:06:49.940The company apparently calls this directed evolution instead of gain-of-function research,
00:06:54.780but it seems very much like the same thing.
00:06:58.220Pfizer has still refused to comment on this in any way.
00:07:01.700By the way, the executive also revealed that they don't need to worry about regulators in Washington
00:07:05.340since Pfizer effectively owns all the regulators.
00:07:18.440I don't know what's going on either. This is ridiculous.0.96
00:07:23.760So you're on video. I'm a journalist.0.97
00:07:26.800Bro, first of all, I'm literally a liar.
00:07:29.920He's on video. You're saying we're exploring how the virus keeps mutating.
00:07:34.780One of the things we're exploring is, why don't we mutate the virus?
00:07:40.660When I heard people describe what the video was, they didn't do it justice.
00:07:46.380anyone describing what happens in this video will not do justice you need to see it you need to see
00:07:51.700this guy lose his mind when he's confronted by um who's the guy who runs project veritas0.88
00:07:58.500i fucking forget his name he's like anyway i'll get pissed i'll get pissed on for that later patio0.99
00:08:03.100furniture patio furniture perfect but once he's confronted like this guy has a fucking meltdown0.99
00:08:11.940And it's, it's the, remember what I said before, like on our last episode, where if you kill your kids and then jump out the window, that's kind of an admission of guilt.0.97
00:08:21.740So if you have a huge meltdown when confronted and saying you were just lying, but then also you're like slitting your wrists and jumping up and down on a table floor, that's also admitting guilt.
00:08:32.700So, so I'm just going to read you a headline.
00:08:35.200so the video comes out what the video shows is this individual who claims to work for Pfizer
00:08:40.980and does work for Pfizer which is what we'll see but he's he's talking about the Pfizer vaccine
00:08:47.040the COVID vaccine and about all the problems that they're seeing he's even admitting that it's
00:08:51.100affecting women's fertility there's all kinds of shit they've they've lost control of the mutations0.67
00:08:57.000of this thing almost verifying and vindicating everyone has been saying this stuff for the0.97
00:09:03.100longest time and why do people say this stuff well because they did the research anyway but he's on
00:09:08.300camera admitting to this and then later on you know he he claims when he's confronted he was lying0.88
00:09:13.340because he was on a date he was a gay man on a gay date um in pursuit of gay sex which is what1.00
00:09:21.080these people like to do yeah do you know that 100 of gay men are responsible for gay sex it's wild0.99
00:09:29.080i mean i i couldn't believe it when i first read that statistic but i mean no one wants to talk0.99
00:09:33.780about this yeah you'll lose your job if you bring this up in the office i tried to tell my uh0.98
00:09:39.600supervisor today about this gay sex thing and she told me to get out of her office0.99
00:09:45.560and then i thought oh she doesn't know what i mean by gay sex so i start talking like here's0.99
00:09:52.300here's what these people do yeah you start drawing a diagram of like the aids virus on her whiteboard0.95
00:09:57.940and i i know there's a couple gay guys in the office so i say page them in here and she said1.00
00:10:02.880we don't have that functionality in the office so i call her a stupid cunt because like that is1.00
00:10:07.760admit that look maybe but that is a cunt thing to say to someone in your office1.00
00:10:15.380you know for the middle east she would have given me tea yeah exactly i took off my fucking shoes0.99
00:10:21.380she didn't like that by the way yeah did you think this was a middle eastern conference room0.99
00:10:28.740as you start to raise your voice you take off your shoe and raise it in the air
00:10:32.520threateningly i treat people with the respect i think they're given and i think the middle
00:10:36.940easterners the arabs have a lot of good ideas1.00
00:10:39.920like throwing shoes at guys is a thing i'd like us to throw more shoes around here
00:10:48.460that seemed like a cool thing to do because it's a nice in-between because i think as as white men
00:10:53.800we don't have a good in-between we go you know seething rage and then it's right to shooting0.91
00:11:00.580right or right to stabbing or constructing a nuclear device in your garage
00:11:18.460but like if we had a couple intermediary steps between you know just being peeved and terrorism
00:11:25.540throwing a shoe is we we would throw way more shoes oh yeah then above that's the knockout
00:11:32.920game i'm not i'm not saying the knockout game's good i'm saying white people haven't tried it
00:11:36.360maybe there's certain things that black people do that white people kind of like once we try
00:11:42.240them out right uh air jordans it's a lovely shoe can't recommend it enough i think that's like a0.56
00:11:50.480black convention have you actually worn it i've worn air jordans really okay you know honestly
00:11:56.620they look comfortable my problem with them is i think they're ugly like i would not wear it from0.86
00:12:00.540a style standpoint but damn it does look like it's designed as like a comforting a foot comforting0.56
00:12:06.120device i'm gonna step outside of my bit for a second and say i've got into sneakers like last0.95
00:12:11.140year oh i know and i unironically have watched you do that and i think i think to some extent i
00:12:19.120might have done the same thing if i had the money for it because i mean especially when you're
00:12:23.100working like having comfortable shoes is one of the most important things yeah i get i got into
00:12:28.320sneakers like a teenage boy got into jerking off so it was at a weird time and then i got way too
00:12:37.340far into it and then it became like all you want to that's all you want to do all i want to do is0.99
00:12:42.680wear sneakers around that it's inappropriate yeah so i had to rein that and what the fuck0.94
00:12:48.900was i talking about oh yeah um we're talking about pfizer we're talking about so um there's0.97
00:12:58.460this individual who so that the story that came out um was you know he lost his mind so a lot of
00:13:04.420people when this video came out and project veritas has to deal with this a lot because
00:13:08.480i know project veritas probably would not align with everything i i you know believe or we believe
00:13:14.380or whatever but i think they've done consistently good work i think there's only maybe one example
00:13:20.760where they fucked around that was early on in their career but i think they were more into like
00:13:25.540stunts and things like that um and the problem is that project veritas still they are on the0.93
00:13:31.680conservative side of things and then when they try and be funny they fuck it up but other than
00:13:36.540that like i don't think they've been really wrong about anything however when this video comes out
00:13:42.540everyone wants to say it's wrong right away so i just wanted to show an article i'm going to show
00:13:49.940an article that that came out uh january 28th so this would have been around the time when this
00:13:55.860happened right okay and this is on forbes so i'm just trying to give an example of a mainstream
00:14:01.800or mainstream adjacent article okay so here's the headline no project veritas video doesn't
00:14:09.700prove pfizer is mutating covid19 who is jordan tristan walker so right away you're furious i'm
00:14:17.680furious oh yeah it's it's very patronizing who wrote this senior contributor who bruce y lee
00:14:26.360bruce lee wrote this himself okay okay let's start with that now you know as a white man you have to
00:14:33.540love bruce lee now what's this guy's i'm comparing him the other bruce lee what's this guy's byline
00:14:38.180i am a writer journalist professor systems modeler computational and digital health expert
00:14:45.280avocado eater an entrepreneur not always in that order so this is the air of the great bruce lee
00:14:53.940so the for the first part of the article this guy is responding to tucker carlson the first
00:15:05.040two paragraphs are literally just him making fun of tucker carlson uh so i'll give an example
00:15:12.300what's this story that's supposedly the subject of a media blackout according to carlson well
00:15:18.480carlson has also tweeted the following about it quote project fair test just released an
00:15:23.120undercover video wow a pfizer exact bragging about a frankenstein science that sounds like
00:15:30.240a monstrous revelation doesn't it but before carlson's claim before carlson's claim makes you
00:15:36.680sit bolt upright in your chair that sounds like a straight up typo there keep in mind that this
00:15:42.760was carlson who had said this yes this was the tucker carlson whom john oliver has called a
00:15:48.940super spreader of covid 19 vaccine fears so like he's citing john oliver right now so basically
00:15:56.120the entire point of this article what i'm trying to say is that he's claiming that the individual
00:16:02.260the subject of this investigation jordan walker was not an employee of pfizer and this was a line
00:16:09.460i heard a lot when this dropped like who is this guy and then i'm no joke most journalists i saw
00:16:16.800were saying we looked on linkedin and we couldn't find them anywhere on linkedin0.98
00:16:20.900which is a straight up lie you're just full of shit which and here's the thing even if it wasn't0.98
00:16:27.260to lie no one the only people who give a shit about linkedin are journalists real people doing0.99
00:16:32.320real work don't need a fucking linkedin profile it is for marketers and hr people that's the only0.98
00:16:39.820people who actually go on linkedin if you ever like check a feed or anything like ceos don't0.97
00:16:44.900give a fuck about linkedin and this is a note for all you entrepreneurs and marketers out there
00:16:50.320do not waste your time advertising on linkedin and i'm saying this as someone who's walked down0.99
00:16:55.840that path and been at agencies that spent thousands and thousands of dollars. There's no,
00:17:01.220the ROI is shit. You will waste all your money. You will get no leads because all the people1.00
00:17:06.500you think that you want, they actually aren't on LinkedIn. They have an account, but if you look
00:17:13.220at the analytics for LinkedIn, the time spent on site is abysmal. And it's also the most expensive
00:17:19.760platform. I've just, I've never had any good luck on LinkedIn. Anyway, but to journalists,
00:17:24.280it's a big deal so it makes sense that a journalist would check on linkedin but anyway
00:17:28.780they're trying to sell you a story that this guy was not working at the organization um however
00:17:35.980certain developments occurred in the days since this happened so um
00:17:41.340so first of all project veritas also discovered a list of six scientific papers that were written
00:17:49.860by this individual dr jordan walker because that was the other thing they were saying
00:17:54.140we can't find any reports that he's written no studies no research his name he's a nobody
00:17:59.600he's a ghost implying that they made it up and we've taken quite a while to locate this but they
00:18:05.180did which means the journalists didn't do it right so here's six articles that are on pub med so these
00:18:11.760are real papers that he was included on and interestingly here there's a leaked memo from
00:18:19.380pfizer um and this memo is discussing the project veritas incident and what they're saying is i'm
00:18:27.620not going to read the whole thing but uh one thing here is that uh second paragraph of the memo
00:18:33.660actually i'm gonna read the first two paragraphs because it's very funny and i believe this because
00:18:38.060i've worked in an organization that sent an internal memo similar to this i worked in an
00:18:44.700organization just as a preface that was having uh difficulties with the press there was i'm not
00:18:50.540going to try and dox myself but there was an incident where journalists were sniffing around
00:18:54.740and what happens when that happens they send an internal memo to everyone just like this0.96
00:18:59.480saying look if anyone approaches you send it to this person whoever the fuck it is or send them0.92
00:19:04.240to me don't talk to the press it's very very panicked but very very firm so here is uh the0.97
00:19:10.460first couple of things. Fact-based information rooted in sound science is vitally important to
00:19:17.320preserving Pfizer's scientific innovations, reputation, and trust with business partners,
00:19:23.040and ultimately enables us to deliver breakthroughs for patients. Anti-science activists are becoming
00:19:29.880increasingly brazen in their drive to gain and manipulate information, fueling the spread of
00:19:36.000baseless claims and endangering public health working at Pfizer and doing the important work
00:19:42.240that we do makes colleagues an ongoing target for these organizations we are aware of and managing
00:19:48.060a recent incident where one of our colleagues was baited into conversation in a social situation
00:19:53.560and recorded without their knowledge manipulated videos were subsequently posted online
00:19:58.420so in case you missed it they just admitted he was a colleague of theirs yeah yeah so that's it
00:20:05.200right there again something that the journalists didn't want to do now what i was saying was the
00:20:11.540danger is that if you were just a regular person seeing this story you see project veritas and
00:20:17.600project veritas tends to release the primary source it releases just the video of whatever
00:20:23.320it is they were filming which should be in fact better than journalism because you're giving
00:20:28.200people the straight dope but some people would probably need some contextualization like just
00:20:34.180tell me what the story is i need someone to tell me this in a short story which is what people need
00:20:39.180and so the short storytellers were like uh we can't find this guy i'm not saying he doesn't
00:20:45.000exist but uh there's no evidence of it and now that that has been firmly planted in people's
00:20:50.400heads across the entire mainstream press stuff like this does not get rewritten into the story
00:20:56.420and i don't know if it's by design but as i've said before i don't really care if anything is
00:21:03.060malicious or accidental anymore. I treat everything as malicious, especially when you
00:21:10.120have the public trust in you. When you have power and influence in society, you don't get
00:21:16.460ignorance anymore. I'm going to treat you like you did everything on purpose, which means I'm
00:21:21.280going to treat you with maximum hostility. So journalists in this case must be treated with
00:21:26.120maximum hostility for what might as well be a conspiratorial effort to hijack people's
00:21:33.940methods of learning through stories and their inability to rewrite a story once it has been
00:21:40.060recorded and contextualized in their brain. Let's talk about this Project Veritas video.
00:21:46.020They targeted a mid-level management guy at Pfizer. Do we know exactly what his
00:21:55.480uh title was he's like a director he you know of yeah and it's fascinating the way this is being
00:22:02.120spun by by veritas the the guy talks about conversations that they've had and about
00:22:12.680procedures that would go forward and they're not they're just throwing this around but and and i
00:22:17.560gotta say like i'm not sure what this guy's actual title is because i mean larry elder who i don't
00:22:22.040believe is a credible person says he's just the visor director of research and development i
00:22:26.440don't think that's the case he is not the director he is a director director is a like term like
00:22:34.120above manager low you know executive vice president type of thing or something like that
00:22:39.800they're talking about this term direct direct evolution direct evolution function yes
00:22:45.960he could be talking about research that's ongoing because of course there's ongoing research i would
00:22:51.720presume about covid not necessarily at pfizer but they jump cut yeah we're then we're like a part of
00:23:00.520the conversation where he is talking about pfizer now pfizer may be doing these experiments there's
00:23:05.720no way pfizer's just doing these experiments like hey let's go down to the garage and do these
00:23:11.720experiments there's no way pfizer's just doing these experiments like hey let's go down to the0.98
00:23:21.400a garage and do these experiments and i got news for you that means you're gay
00:23:26.380so this is just one example of that about this and you can you can still find these articles0.94
00:23:34.980it didn't happen that long ago and they're always like no oh you're it's always patronizing it's
00:23:39.900always oh you saw project veritas video uh slow down honey let's have a look at that what's
00:23:45.880PolitiFact say oh pants on fire by the way I've worked with PolitiFact before they are actually0.96
00:23:53.300retards yeah if you talk to Politi here's what will make people feel uh happy and again I've0.98
00:24:01.000worked with PolitiFact uh in the past so this wouldn't have been relevant to anything that's1.00
00:24:05.700happened recently but they everyone at PolitiFact is genuinely confused why people don't like them
00:24:12.620i want people to feel good about that feel good that right now at politifact the little pants on
00:24:19.520fire truth-o-meter people they they every day they get thousands of negative comments and they
00:24:26.600don't know why and they're scared and they're sad so all i can say to people is keep up the good work0.92
00:24:32.400because people are thinking like oh these big companies don't give a shit about this no they0.92
00:24:38.120do it's all they talk about i promise you everyone at these organizations these ngos0.97
00:24:44.100they're they're so disconnected from reality that they're spending thousands of dollars to figure0.92
00:24:50.580out why no one likes them and i just want people take that as a white pill whatever so what did
00:24:56.500you think of the video by the way did you did you watch it yeah no i watched i think i watched the
00:25:01.780entire thing not just the clips is pretty entertaining it's kind of what i expected to
00:25:06.340me the big thing it reinforces is the the again the really poor quality of people that these
00:25:12.180corporations uh have like he wasn't he like he's a director or like a head something senior0.99
00:25:19.240something something like yes how did this guy even get this fucking job you're the sort of person who0.89
00:25:23.940can't even keep their first of all you're drinking with a random stranger and giving them like0.99
00:25:27.820company secrets at a bar and you're you throw a fit and chimp out and like get violent while0.87
00:25:34.780news cameras are rolling like what kind of person are you i'm surprised this guy even passed0.99
00:25:38.960like high school you know like how did you become a senior director of research at fucking0.98
00:25:45.660pfizer in new york like where's my job like this is crazy it is funny because as a director in my0.92
00:25:52.720world in the world that i thought existed if you're a director and and i know this isn't true
00:25:57.260anymore because i've met directors but if you're a director you should be able to have to shoulder
00:26:02.040of that responsibility and if so and to not try and trade your responsibility is to not trade0.96
00:26:13.120company secrets for gay sex that's what if if we are to believe his story which is that i was just0.99
00:26:21.040saying shit because i was on a date i wanted to seem cool i'm like first of all that's dumb0.99
00:26:25.880because that's not what i would say if i was with a girl i wouldn't just start like saying that the0.99
00:26:30.940company i work for is evil that's an odd thing to say but then also you should be better than that
00:26:37.320you know i mean how how can we accept that as a valid excuse like he was baited into telling and
00:26:44.120also if they're lies why do we need a memo about it and i guess i i should have also led with that0.96
00:26:49.740that if this guy was just talking shit they wouldn't need an internal memo they would be like0.99
00:26:57.720okay guys look this guy they would be like a coping of this guy fucked up uh he has nothing0.99
00:27:03.740to do with any of this no it was that he was unfairly targeted at everything he did say0.87
00:27:09.660everything but it was creatively edited that's what they said they said it was edited out of
00:27:14.620context that's so bad because if they just said he was a liar i'd be like okay maybe there's
00:27:21.880something but they're like no no just you need the full story what's the full story about runaway0.99
00:27:26.480mutations faggots and the other thing is is like me saying oh um these these reporters they ask all0.97
00:27:34.340these loaded questions and then they edit it and they publish it and it's out of context and you0.99
00:27:38.240simply don't understand now hold on a second if anybody's been following veritas knows that that
00:27:43.920is the go-to canard of any of the companies when they go to defend themselves against one of these
00:27:49.420pieces that comes out and veritas keeps winning these like libel and defamation suits because
00:27:55.900they they keep saying oh veritas is you know lying veritas is presenting out of context information
00:28:01.700and then veritas sues them and wins because they're not actually you're impugning their uh
00:28:07.680you know quality as a news agency and the truth is that everything is it's 100 like they just0.96
00:28:12.380went through a big one i think with the new york times recently about the um the fucking somalis0.91
00:28:18.140like um doing the the voter voter fraud during the election or something yeah yeah it's like oh0.97
00:28:24.000yeah no no i mean that's all misrepresentation because that actually didn't happen and we're
00:28:28.180like no it it 100 happened take it back and they were right so i mean this isn't gonna stick if
00:28:33.540that's your whole angle is well technically he did say those things and he does work for us but
00:28:37.780it's out of context it's like no it's not out of context and your first two lies failed so now
00:28:45.460this is a third lie like i don't if anyone's paying attention that would be it and also i
00:28:51.700you had a good example there about the voting because i think you know the trump biden election
00:28:57.320would be a great example is because i still hear of news trickle in very verifiable news
00:29:03.720that there's voting irregularities very serious ones but good luck trying to start that conversation
00:29:11.820and rewrite that established story in people's minds it's not even because they're
00:29:45.060And I'm not trying to give hard and fast rules that everyone needs to follow, but this is something that we've been following on the show and it's worked out well for me.
00:29:54.160And we've been doing it. I've been doing it personally for months and years now, actually, which is I never comment on a story that is breaking unless it's to kind of laugh at it, I guess.
00:30:06.540like you know we're comment you know one comment we had was on that you know that black guy who0.59
00:30:11.820wrote that uh manifesto you know where he said the n-word 20,000 times that's a fun breaking
00:30:20.040story to go after but anything serious like i'll i'll you we might make a comment but i'm not
00:30:25.840decided yet i'm always thinking i want to see how this plays out and some people think that's you
00:30:31.260know that's cowardly or something but it's it it always changes like for example i'll give you
00:30:37.460another one um one that i think might this is one where we might have caught it which is um there
00:30:45.200was an article published recently by seymour hirsch who's a pretty famous uh journalist
00:30:51.300about the nordstrom 2 pipeline um and then the title of this it's on substack seymour s-e-y-m-o-u-r
00:31:00.280hirsch.substack.com you can find it there how america took out the nordstrom pipeline
00:31:06.820uh and the subheading here is the new york times called it a mystery but the united states
00:31:12.740executed a covert sea operation that was kept secret until now now when the nordstrom event
00:31:19.620occurred i think it was i think what happened there was it was buried in with the ukraine war
00:31:25.080so no it wasn't as a big deal as people thought but i think everyone knew it was suspicious
00:31:30.940and that's why this story is getting caught because when you heard sir that the nordstrom 2
00:31:35.060blew up mysteriously most people were saying oh that was probably america but now we're getting
00:31:42.400verification of that so this is a case where i think the re-verification might work a bit but
00:31:47.340i just wanted to read it out here and this is why it's so good to kind of wait on these stories
00:31:52.040because if we wait then this will be the definitive story the definitive version of the
00:31:58.620nordstrom 2 thing now if i explain this to someone they will need to rewrite something in their mind
00:32:03.200and they'll be able to hear it so here's uh here i'm just gonna read a couple lines from this
00:32:07.640because i think you'll find this interesting if you haven't read it um last june the navy divers
00:32:13.940operating under a covert a cover of a widely publicized midsummer nato exercise known as
00:32:21.060baltops 22 b-a-l-t-o-p-s 22 planted the remotely triggered explosive that three months later
00:32:28.120destroyed three of the four nordstrom pipelines according to a source with direct knowledge of
00:32:33.860the operational planning uh two of the pipelines which were known collectively as nordstrom one
00:32:39.060had been providing germany with much of and much of western europe with cheap russian natural gas
00:32:44.700for more than a decade a second pair of pipelines called nordstrom 2 had been built more than uh
00:32:51.740had been built but were not yet operational now with russian troops massing on the ukrainian
00:32:57.520border and the bloodiest war in europe since 1945 looming president joseph biden saw the pipelines
00:33:03.600as a vehicle for vladimir putin to weaponize natural gas for his political and territorial
00:33:09.320ambitions um and he's talking here about when he reached out to the white house spokesperson
00:33:14.360They kept saying this is false and complete, complete fiction.
00:33:20.500Biden's decision to sabotage the pipelines came after more than nine months of highly secret back and forth debate inside Washington's natural national security community about how to best achieve that goal.
00:33:33.260For much of that time, the issue was not whether to do the mission, but how to get it done with no overt clue as to who was responsible.
00:33:41.600and so he's basically saying that this was it wasn't some people thought oh someone shot a
00:33:47.100rocket in the ocean it wasn't that these were charges planted before time beforehand that's
00:33:53.900what he's saying happened and like if that's true that's the real story and i think if we just wait
00:34:00.900and this story comes out and we can if you bring this to people this will be the definitive story
00:34:05.460in their mind but if the whole time they're kind of confused they got half stories from shitty0.84
00:34:11.260duplicitous journalists this won't be the bombshell that it really ought to be
00:34:16.140anyway that was that was just the point i was making and what do you think about that what do
00:34:20.700you think about a general rule that whenever like a big story is happening we can talk about it we
00:34:28.840can discuss it but like don't start saying here's my stance on it or here's what i think is going
00:34:35.760to happen we should wait until we know a bit more and and hash it out amongst ourselves but not
00:34:40.840be like here's the stance i'm taking and so what do you think about that no it's absolutely true
00:34:46.740it's it's like uh in the economy of takes it's like volatility kind of like when something first
00:34:53.400happens there's so much going on you have to you really have to wait till the smoke clears
00:34:57.160um because if it's something that matters you're guaranteed that the room is going to be full of
00:35:04.100like a cacophony of competing voices saying totally contradictory things each one of them
00:35:09.880with their own um with their own bent their own motive right so when when the next thing you can
00:35:19.200almost time it by like when the next thing pops into the news cycle you can go back to the previous
00:35:24.040thing and now truth becomes the more of the the economic standard there where the the only takes
00:35:31.280that are traded are the ones that are actually going to matter in the long run and you still
00:35:35.340don't know necessarily what's true but the handful of takes that are left are the ones that you can
00:35:40.560kind of usually work through those like synthesize those into something that approximates the truth
00:35:45.560versus when stuff happens i mean if you look at even if you look at the difference between
00:35:49.980when something happens the first five minutes versus three hours later like the first five
00:35:56.040minutes you will is when you will hear like it was an alien uh it was a lightning bolt there was a0.97
00:36:02.880fucking uh a bandit clown and then three hours later it's like oh and it was just a it was a1.00
00:36:08.060mass shooter but he was probably a right winger you know he's probably one of these assholes1.00
00:36:12.300and then like five days later it's like no it was it was a black man actually yeah but uh but don't0.99
00:36:18.400worry about that because we've already moved on to we're back on ukraine now so don't worry about
00:36:22.440that you know it's another good example is you know i had this a line you know they always say
00:36:27.320don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good yeah that's my favorite that's my i like that
00:36:33.720and i would also say don't let evil be the enemy of the bad and what i am applying that to is the
00:36:41.440covid narrative the covid narrative that came out of our side of things and we are people and we
00:36:46.940we've always been like this on the show saying from the very very start except maybe maybe for
00:36:53.160the first few weeks we were on board because we were hearing like weird stories about too many
00:36:56.520corpses but we were like okay the code vaccine it's bad it's untested the bad things are going
00:37:02.160to happen we know bad things are going to happen and i think if we stuck with that and and people
00:37:08.420didn't dig their heels in with billions are going to die in a year i think that's fucked people over
00:37:15.360more than everything because to me it's inarguable right now that we are seeing real life consequences
00:37:21.900of the covid vaccine they're trying to wallpaper it over by calling it long covid
00:37:27.520they're trying you know there's people dropping dead from heart disease like at weird ages my
00:37:33.700myocarditis is all these things that we were talking about but very early on there's the
00:37:39.900loudest voices were saying this is population control three billion people are gonna die by0.91
00:37:45.520this time next year like that's a stupid thing to say but that was intoxicating because that0.92
00:37:52.480sounded good to say because that's like an evil plan and we'd like evil plans we always talk about0.96
00:37:56.860evil plans but i'm like we kind of i think we shot ourselves in the foot with that because
00:38:01.520that is the dominant narrative for most people that came out of the right and even people on
00:38:06.540the right even people who should know better i'm not going to say any names but people who should0.64
00:38:12.340know better are still talking about like these anti-vaccine people that are crazy and they're0.60
00:38:18.800crossing their arms like oh so when are the seven billion gonna die and it's like you
00:38:23.200you're purposefully ignoring the things are happening because you became too attached to
00:38:29.100this one crazy narrative but i was also saying that this whole time if we just avoided digging
00:38:34.460our heels into that one prediction we might have been a bit more flexible and fluid in selling
00:38:41.320people on let's just say this isn't an evil wicked plot but it is bad and there's people0.97
00:38:46.800responsible for doing a bad stupid thing and that should be enough to bring out the pitchforks is my1.00
00:38:51.480point you know i mean but if if we if we predict like it's the death star it just we fuck ourselves0.99
00:38:58.440over and we fuck ourselves over too early before we know for sure and we know more now about more
00:39:04.320bad things that are happening but we're kind of stuck in the in the swamp of like like some of us0.92
00:39:10.740predicted some really dumb things but you know i i will i want to find a situation or not find a
00:39:17.700situation but find a solution where we avoid doing that in the future for things that really matter
00:39:22.720like covet really mattered some of these big stories really matter and we do ourselves a
00:39:27.060disservice by overshooting it way too early i guess that's what i'm trying to say does that
00:39:32.680make any sense yeah yeah it does so i guess also i'm saying is like people shut up you know what
00:39:38.360It was actually Morgoth, I'm remembering.
00:40:08.360like let's let's reintroduce that a bit into the zeitgeist we got going on over here
00:40:16.080yeah well i mean we have we kind of have the attitude of like it's like a bunch of a bunch
00:40:23.220of guys caught in a room which they believe is on fire and are not sure where the exit is and
00:40:27.340it's like everybody is offering opinions and everybody wants to seem like the leader and
00:40:31.220the smart one and it's because everybody thinks they're about to die and which is kind of true
00:40:36.360in some sense but um yeah there's not it's there's never there's never the level of like
00:40:41.940calm and the feeling of safety that is needed uh to create an atmosphere where we can you know
00:40:49.140discuss things seriously it does get frustrating i like sometimes i just i actually want to step
00:40:54.000out of it i think he's he's completely right um that it's like it is but you can't we're we're
00:41:00.660incapable of just saying i don't know maybe maybe just sit on this one for it maybe just keep this
00:41:04.760went under my hat for a bit and we'll let's talk about i mean you and i actually do it fairly often
00:41:08.920we joke about it it's like oh man this is old news this was from two weeks ago but we're talking
00:41:12.620about it now but i like it that way you know i mean if i we're going to talk about stuff that's0.87
00:41:17.060fresh it's just for our you know shit posting it's just for the the hottest takes as it you know
00:41:24.600yeah just like i'm not trying to throw anyone under the bus here because this next sentence0.96
00:41:29.760throws everyone under the bus but one example is i i take in a lot of content from our scene
00:41:37.080i've not seen a single person be correct about the russia ukraine conflict
00:41:42.760not one and i remember i wrote them down i'm like i'm gonna see how this goes in two weeks
00:41:53.200every single person has been wrong about every single prediction and we've talked about this
00:41:58.940before but i'm like okay let's just stop doing it then we're not good at it i'm not saying i'm a
00:42:03.320genius i'm saying it's it seems like no one in the world is good at calling this so let's stop
00:42:11.460yeah i i will say i remember when it started it was like february now that it's been almost a
00:42:17.300year right that's been going on and um i remember not feeling that i had a conviction that it was
00:42:23.560going to go one way or another but i had a bunch in my head a bunch of scenarios i thought would
00:42:26.980play out and at no point did i think it was going to be a long bloody embarrassing stalemate for
00:42:35.360essentially a year which to my understanding it's essentially it's been a year like like it's been0.99
00:42:40.680a while it's been a year a lot of slabs are dead and it seems like at this point the the largest0.50
00:42:47.060pain is being leveraged against the allies of the two nations and nothing is being achieved i don't0.90
00:42:53.600keep up to it day to day but like can you guys just fucking end it i don't even care who wins1.00
00:42:57.800just can you shut the fuck up about ukraine like somebody just win already for fuck's sake0.99
00:43:03.000this is we're real archie bunkers when it comes to war1.00
00:43:06.740ah geez take it out in the back 40 i don't care if you fight but not in a fucking living i didn't0.97
00:43:13.940expect that after this uh length of time literally nothing would change because i remember there was0.96
00:43:20.580people early on when um who was trying to join nato was sweden i believe sweden and another
00:43:26.620country that were talking about joining nato and then i had said i don't think they will i mean i
00:43:34.420don't or i don't think their desire to join nato is that high because i'm like you know if we're
00:43:39.460being realists political offensive realists it's like well they're looking at their best interest
00:43:45.500They need to actually wait. Is my geopolitical interest stronger under the American umbrella of influence and America's way, way, way far away? Or am I actually safer not upsetting my neighbor Russia just for my own survival? Would it make sense to stay out of it or side with their enemy?
00:44:09.320and i know that the uh admission into the eu and nato is being blocked by i think like turkey or
00:44:17.560something but i'm like yes but i called it i'm like i don't think they're gonna join anything
00:44:21.580really well it looks like nothing fucking happened except a lot of people died probably way more than0.64
00:44:27.660they're saying because you also have to realize don't believe anyone and that's the other thing0.91
00:44:31.420at the core of this like when a conflict like this happens you have to understand everybody's lying0.78
00:44:36.700so i don't understand just like with china like don't believe anything coming out of china don't
00:44:41.320believe anything said about china so i'm like okay then it's a it's kind of impossible to know
00:44:46.300for if you're trying to stand up that's one thing i don't hear that talked about a lot but the
00:44:50.840ukraine thing is interesting like yeah i guess because of because of like azob versus dugan
00:44:59.120like there's kind of an there's like an angle where this is kind of a right-wing discussion
00:45:03.780like a dissident right-wing discussion but it's also a huge global discussion and they're not
00:45:08.960even interested in the azog or the dugan as topics let alone you know putting those two
00:45:15.300against each other so um so i think that we trend we tend to treat it like this is actually one of
00:45:21.120our discussions but in reality like talking about charlottesville was one of our discussions
00:45:26.100talking about the election being stolen talking about the trucker protest these are our discussions
00:45:29.900in the sense that they affect us directly not indirectly and they are they are movements in
00:45:36.380which key players actually belong to us they're our people like on a first name basis in some cases
00:45:41.820whereas that that's just not true at all in with the ukraine like oh we're all like you know three
00:45:47.600levels removed from whatever the fuck's going on over there nobody actually knows even the people
00:45:51.780who are involved don't even fucking know it's a literal war so like what i mean is like it's the0.90
00:45:56.000fog of war like nobody actually has any idea so i i would say the one like abstract overlay i could0.92
00:46:01.600put over this whole thing not just the war in ukraine but everything for the past few years0.82
00:46:05.660is i always seem to come away saying that's that's just retarded like i could not have guessed just0.97
00:46:12.680how dumb that is just like just it just like it's clown remember that the vast majority of the time0.85
00:46:19.600when people are talking about this conflict i'm sorry if people are getting bogged down i'm sorry0.96
00:46:23.860we're getting bogged down in this again but i do want to say that i apologize if i said this before
00:46:28.980and i'm repeating myself but it's like when you try and shot call these sorts of events
00:46:34.060what you're really just saying is what you would like to happen like people would like russia to
00:46:39.660win they would like some would like ukraine to win because they represent different ideologies
00:46:45.120or different stances and there's some people we're trying to take a bit more of a realist
00:46:48.820approach and to say like well here's what's probably going to happen but their main thing
00:46:53.020is like supply lines and resources i'm like that's part of it that's not the whole picture either
00:46:57.820obviously but most of the time it's like people superimposing their own worldview on what the
00:47:04.040event is and all all i'm saying is i usually but but all that is is you what you're doing what you
00:47:10.080should do which is look at your own self-interest but i'm also saying that that self and don't
00:47:14.200mistake that hopeful self-interest for an accurate prediction of what's going to go on
00:47:21.240yeah like like the belief that ukraine's gonna win because nationalism has to win
00:47:26.300you know i mean like they're self-determined people like we're self-determined people i'm like
00:47:30.600that's not really what's happening there and then like azov battalion like there look them there
00:47:36.260are guys and i look at azov battalion i'm like this feels like a meme this feels like i'm being
00:47:41.420lied to like i'm having azov battalion on a platter given to me by different people
00:47:46.800one guys are telling me they're nazis the other people are telling me they're furries
00:47:50.700some people are telling me they're actually fake nazis and they're really libertarians like i i
00:47:54.860don't know what the read on azov battalion has ever been at their public events one thing that
00:48:01.500surprised me was how many ukrainians tend to see azov not as militants or extremists but as war
00:48:06.540heroes in key of the capital i watched an independent state parade where veterans of
00:48:11.620the azov battalion marched alongside other volunteer militias surrounded by cheering
00:48:16.220crowds who thanked them for defending Ukraine against Russia.
00:48:19.460But even at the march, there were signs of the far-right ideology that's so common inside
01:07:35.340a more flexible approach to machine learning,
01:07:39.060and this is published in quanta magazine um it's about neural nets and it says liquid neural nets
01:07:45.620based on a worm's nervous system can transform the underlying algorithms on the fly giving them
01:07:53.020unprecedented speed and adaptability liquid neural networks offer an elegant and compact
01:08:01.800alternative says ken goldberg a roboticist at the university of california he added that
01:08:07.740Experiments are already showing that these networks can run faster and more accurately than other so-called continuous time neural networks, which model systems that vary over time.
01:08:22.100So respect for the lowly worm led him and Hassani to the new liquid networks, which each neuron is governed by an equation that predicts its behavior over time.
01:08:33.980and just as neurons are linked to each other, these equations depend on each other. The network
01:08:40.420essentially solves this entire ensemble of linked equations, allowing it to characterize the state
01:08:46.060of the system at any given moment, a departure from traditional neural networks, which only give
01:08:50.900the results at a particular moment in time. So liquid networks also differ in how they treat
01:08:57.200synapses, the connections between artificial neurons, the strength of those connections in
01:09:03.060The standard network can be expressed by a single number, its weight.
01:09:07.260In liquid networks, the exchange of signals between neurons is a probabilistic process governed by a nonlinear function, meaning that responses to inputs are not always proportional.
01:09:19.020This is kind of getting into like quantum computer stuff right now, too.
01:09:23.380What impressive thing is biology doing to you that computers are not yet?
01:09:29.940I would say I'm definitely on, I'm much more hesitant with the analogies to the brain than I think you would see potentially in the field.
01:09:37.420And I kind of feel like certainly the way neural networks started is everything stemmed from inspiration by the brain.
01:09:45.480But at the end of the day, the artifacts that you get after training, they are arrived at by a very different optimization process than the optimization process that gave rise to the brain.
01:09:54.400And so I think, I kind of think of it as a very complicated alien artifact.
01:10:04.020They are a complicated alien artifact.
01:10:06.880I do not make analogies to the brain because I think the optimization process that gave rise to it is very different from the brain.
01:10:13.080So there was no multi-agent self-play kind of setup and evolution.
01:10:17.960it was an optimization that is basically a what amounts to a compression objective on a massive
01:10:24.080amount of data okay so artificial neural networks are doing compression and biological neural
01:10:30.180networks are trying to survive and they're not really doing anything they're they're an agent
01:10:35.400in a multi-agent self-play system that's been running for a very very long time that said
01:10:41.400evolution has found that it is very useful to to predict and have a predictive model in the brain
01:10:47.300And so I think our brain utilizes something that looks like that as a part of it, but it has a lot more gadgets and gizmos and value functions and ancient nuclei that are all trying to make it survive and reproduce and everything else.
01:11:01.920this is the stuff that always i always say like we talked before about black swan events i'm not
01:11:08.000saying this is exactly a black swan event but a black swan event is an unpredictable
01:11:13.200occurrence that kind of changes the world in it forces you to rewrite what you know about the
01:11:20.040world in retrospect because you know you should have seen it coming yeah i'm not saying this is
01:11:26.160that but this is one of those things where when it comes to i'm always shocked by people in our
01:11:32.520scene who are poo-pooing ai and saying like it's not going to be anything like why not like then
01:11:39.240this happens a new type of neural network that allows it to think in a in a way that employs
01:11:45.920like a hybrid of synthetic but also natural like it functions like an organism so it's not
01:11:53.860it's not constrained by what we think are the constraints of technology which is something
01:11:59.140human made we are now dragging in structures from the natural world to operate in a way that is
01:12:05.740maybe more advanced than us see what i'm saying so then they're talking like oh ai it's what are
01:12:11.860you doing making fake seinfeld episodes it's like yeah then this happens and now you look like a1.00
01:12:17.240fucking idiot for not caring you know what i mean and i'm just i'm i'm sick of people not caring0.99
01:12:22.680about stuff anyway what do you think about well i mean ai in particular there are a lot of people1.00
01:12:26.480that don't care about ai like i can kind of get that take six months or a year ago but just in
01:12:31.280the past little while with all the visual ai and chat gpt and everything that's going on and and
01:12:37.240not just those technologies being developed but the very rapid and industry adoption of those
01:12:42.580technologies like if you are now still denying the impact of this technology you you're under a rock
01:12:50.820like your your opinion is invalid essentially um it's and i i uh i this this kind of touches on
01:12:58.640what we were saying a little bit earlier i'm almost to the point of like i need to write a
01:13:03.24010 page article about this because i actually use it for work uh and what do you do what do you use
01:13:10.080it for well like for like visual ai i'll like i'll i mean i don't want to go into too much detail but
01:13:15.160like the thing that my wife and i are working on right now we're using the visual ai i know
01:13:19.040censored and on is using it as well i know a bunch of the guys on our scene are using it
01:13:22.080and that's just us in the dr like people in the industry are using it as well and then i'm aware
01:13:26.080of like chat gbt um is already being used in all kinds of applications like chat tb chat gbt
01:13:33.920just that one iteration of this type of neural net um is so powerful that you can get it to write
01:13:41.360software like you can get it to write python code and it can essentially
01:13:44.560write other programs or you can like you can get chat gpt i've read that i haven't seen this but
01:13:50.920i read a claim that you can ask chat gpt to write like a constantly changing um stock market
01:13:58.420screener that is better than like extremely expensive paid stock market screener so it's
01:14:03.780even very and this is like like last week's news this is not from last fall so like this has the
01:14:10.600potential to even significantly alter the market and then the next question is is it already
01:14:15.720affecting the industry and the market and things that we're not even aware of because the sort of
01:14:21.180people that would be using it in this way would they be open about it would they be public about
01:14:25.140it or would it be something that they keep close to their chest so just the fact that that's
01:14:29.740possible you think of this it's like from an industry standpoint from a from a cultural or
01:14:35.760economic standpoint it's like the atom bomb but it's an atom bomb that fits on your hard drive
01:14:41.600and nobody has to know that you have or that you use because one of the primary uses if you can
01:14:46.580qualify what this thing is doing is it is imitating human action or imitating human labor
01:14:53.540so the vast majority of places where it's being used you don't know it's being used unless the
01:14:59.080person tells you and that's kind of the whole point to it right so the irony is knowing that
01:15:04.240to say well this thing has no effect well how do you know that i'm not it how do you know that0.88
01:15:10.040you're not talking to it right fucking that like dimes for all you know i'm not here i just am0.90
01:15:17.480using chat gpt run through you know a voice ai which has you know been been built through a liquid0.98
01:15:27.140neural net on the last 200 episodes of the podcast that's a that could actually be done
01:15:32.500that's the dream yeah that's the dream i'm not even here second mike is is a robot tonight
01:15:37.460you don't know you know what i mean you are we're at you know right now because just because like
01:15:42.300probabilistically that's so new that this is probably not true i'm seriously talking serious
01:15:46.840right but i mean six months from now you're not going to know or a year from now certainly you're
01:15:51.180not going to know and i think we hadn't we have not accounted for the change that's that's coming
01:15:57.900that's happening now i think the people who aren't concerned about this they don't like it
01:16:04.540for a couple of reasons one because it doesn't fit into their cozy model and their ideology of
01:16:11.540how they think the world works this really is just a monkey wrench thrown into it because it
01:16:16.560doesn't fit with any really political science related thing but it has the power to reduce0.95
01:16:21.960solve political science to who gives a shit like it could right and the other thing is ego i find0.62
01:16:28.220with a lot of people on our side i'm not trying to get too hard on the distant right but it happens0.98
01:16:33.640to everyone but i think there's a lot of people who their ego drives them to think this doesn't
01:16:40.580matter and they want to think it doesn't matter because they think they're more important than
01:16:46.900they are like for example what you had just said was very true that the there are people right now
01:16:51.520who are using this i promise you and there's people at higher levels and they might be in
01:16:55.580finance and they might be in science they might be there are corporations billion dollar corporations
01:17:00.820that have been working on this for for years probably because a lot of them are directly
01:17:07.560funding it and when they directly fund it they get first access to it in some way i'm not saying
01:17:12.300exactly what the deal is but this is how these things tend to work and i don't think people on
01:17:18.000our side want to admit that they're not moving the needle on things right like to admit that
01:17:25.960all this stuff we're doing right now and talking about it's good and it's important but it doesn't0.93
01:17:31.000really affect what's happening at the highest levels they don't really give a shit about us0.84
01:17:35.460i don't think there's a lot of people who want to admit that i think they want to think that0.98
01:17:39.520we're revolutionaries that people are scared of and i don't i think like shit libs are scared of0.97
01:17:46.620us and antifa are scared of us but no one really gives a shit about antifa anymore so that's0.96
01:17:51.300that that's immaterial to anything right like the so we're coming from the position i know we are0.59
01:17:58.280which is like okay we are not the elites we're not anywhere close to being the elite and we
01:18:03.540we're pretty aware of our place in society but we're also not feared really so like the p and
01:18:12.520we're interested in this stuff but that means that there's other people who've been interested
01:18:15.540in a way longer and i think we should know about that and the people who aren't worried about that
01:18:21.000i think they don't want to live in the world where they admit what their status is i think
01:18:26.180they want to believe that their war is winnable and their war is winnable with awareness that if
01:18:32.640they just wake we're still stuck in this paradigm of if we wake people up the revolution will emerge
01:18:38.780like that was never true in history that was never even true in in marxist leninist i don't yeah i
01:18:45.120don't know where that comes from that's and that's a very black pilling frustrating thing for me
01:18:49.000and like we talk we talk about all the time we're like don't fed post don't fed post the only thing
01:18:53.860that's worth talking about is fed post like or i should say the only things that are valuable in
01:18:59.720terms of um moving quote unquote moving the needle as in like getting our goals achieved
01:19:05.220they're all federal crimes and that's by design right so they in some sense they want us to keep
01:19:12.440raising awareness because raising awareness doesn't do shit at best it it kind of pacifies
01:19:19.080us into thinking that we've done something yeah if in this if you are still someone out there
01:19:27.800who's going to like try and own the conservatives go home yeah like if you're someone who's like0.89
01:19:35.600gonna i my job is to show that the dems are the real racist the libs are the real intolerant1.00
01:19:41.800go home yeah shut up and go play in the fucking sand go to the beach have a you don't belong1.00
01:19:50.500in any conversation if you're still going to like conservative events if you're a groiper1.00
01:19:56.660shut the fuck up and go home it's done there's nothing to be done with owning like these people0.99
01:20:03.740you need there has to be another plan i know what's saying don't people do anything i think0.99
01:20:07.960there's a lot to be done but it's not going to actually be awareness based we're pretty good at
01:20:12.180awareness a lot of the people who can be made aware are made aware what they need now is strategy
01:20:18.300and planning and that's something that we're we've been working on for a while in various capacities
01:20:24.120but yeah i i but i think a lot of people on our side like they they're ignoring things that i
01:20:31.500think are unignorable and i think they're hoping things go away or i think they're
01:20:35.640they just can't cross that threshold of understanding their true place in society
01:20:42.040because i think they they still want to see themselves as the good guys i take a bit more
01:20:46.700of that neo-realist you know italian elite theory move where i'm like there is no good or evil
01:20:52.680there's just winners or losers um every story of and we'll get into this in a second with the book
01:20:59.620i'm going to read but every story about a spontaneous revolution was a mythology cooked
01:21:06.000up in the aftermath and if you actually study how for example uh you know the national socialist
01:21:12.520workers party in germany came up how the hitler's revolution the bolshevik revolution it's a lot of
01:21:20.180the american revolution which we're going to talk about in a couple episodes it's a lot messier
01:21:24.940but it's a lot more interesting and just like we talked about uh with rodney stark's book the rise
01:21:31.600of christianity the true story of how christianity spread uh throughout the world essentially
01:21:38.120especially in rome is far more interesting than the christian story which was you know christ
01:21:43.940was here and then there was mass baptisms and a mass enlightenment and everyone heard the good
01:21:50.540news like no what happened was christianity spread very effectively and pretty quickly
01:21:55.660and we can chart its growth through the census of rome about how fast it was adopted that's a
01:22:01.120more interesting story to me because it's not miraculous just like the story of the american
01:22:06.640revolution we like to think that you know there were revolutionaries everywhere that every american
01:22:12.180was on the side of the revolution that's not what it was it was a lot messier and a lot more
01:22:16.340contentious and a lot there was more buildup and then a lot of the stories about the american
01:22:21.620revolution it was like a powder keg and then the revolution just kicked off it's like no no no
01:22:26.360there was a lot of people working up to the revolution with john adams and everything
01:22:31.160but i'm like that that means it's doable because i think some people look at the mythologies of
01:22:36.220revolutions and they don't look at it from sort of an offensive realist or or realistic perspective
01:22:41.820they think oh my god well according to this like every revolution was just a miracle
01:22:46.720it's like no it was hard work and it was kind of shitty and it wasn't it didn't take a lot of
01:22:53.120people it wasn't a mass revolt there was almost no populist support until the end we talked about
01:22:59.340that we talked about the coup d'etat book about how every revolution does after the revolution
01:23:03.860wins everyone says they were involved in the revolution when in fact like 15 to 20 percent
01:23:10.360of people were everyone else was just kind of hanging out and waiting and seeing but that's
01:23:17.060what i say like to me that's more encouraging about what can be done because there's still
01:23:23.560people on our side waiting they think we need to get 60 of people on board with us to do anything
01:23:29.740yeah i mean i i think it's encouraging in the sense that you get you get an like
01:23:36.480um it dawns on you that the actual work required is not that much it's not that difficult and it
01:23:47.040has a high success like a high chance of success but it's discouraging in the sense that you
01:23:54.800realize even though you only need a very tiny number of people to execute it like there's
01:23:59.860almost nobody who is genuinely interested you have a dearth of people who spend all day long
01:24:07.180obsessing over the movement and very few of them like a tiny tiny fraction of them seem actually
01:24:13.280interested in in what actually has to be done i mean i don't know what what else i can say like
01:24:20.460it's just yeah but i mean yes yes if you look at history it's always you can probably i think
01:24:29.840Think if you were going to go in a time machine to either of those revolutions, if you knew
01:24:34.280better, you had a top-down view, there's like 250 guys that you could not touch, and as
01:24:41.360long as you didn't touch them, you could do anything else you wanted and the outcome would
01:24:45.080still be the same, because the actions of that handful of men was what actually gave
01:24:51.140you the outcome that you got, for better or worse, right?
01:24:54.000So that's the truth of it, historically, like that's not an opinion, that's just how
01:24:58.560these things pan out historically it comes down to you know one individual or a group of people
01:25:04.720usually and that oftentimes they will employ tactics that might seem brutal and savage like
01:25:10.820the american revolution was a brutal set from the british perspective the american revolution was0.91
01:25:16.780just cruel like there was no reason for these americans to be so fucking mean to the british0.95
01:25:23.740but they actually were ideologically possessed.0.96
01:25:26.260And this is why ideology still has its place in influencing world events
01:25:31.440because, yeah, they're actually, you know, aside from some trade stuff,
01:25:34.760there was no real reason to fight so viciously against the British.
01:25:39.740But people did it because they believed in this thing called freedom
01:25:42.540against all odds, and they fought for a long, long time.
01:27:54.280But this is a book that's more modern, and it is historical, and it's political.
01:27:59.440But I think it ties into what we were talking about earlier.
01:28:02.000Now, this is called Leo Strauss and the Conservative Movement in America, a critical appraisal.
01:28:09.400It is written by Paul Edward Gottfried.
01:28:13.320So what's interesting, published by Cambridge Press.
01:28:16.620So what's interesting is, OK, I've got to preface this book by saying a couple of things.
01:28:23.040Again, I'm going to tell you two or three things.
01:28:25.400So the thing is, this is a book written by a Jewish person and it is about a Jewish person.
01:28:32.000And that is a rule that we have on the show. Most of the time when we talk about Jewish individuals or Judaism, we quote Jewish sources. And I really want to bold and underline that for people, because sometimes people will be listening to this clip and think we're going hard at Jews, because this is a story about the rise of the neoconservative movement in America and the man who essentially created it.
01:29:00.560And, you know, when people kind of know what neoconservatism is, but what they might not know is, I know they hear neos, they know it's new, but it really was this entity that came out of nowhere that took over the whole mainstream political discourse.
01:29:16.680And it's to answer the question, why do conservatives care so much about Israel?
01:29:23.140Why do conservatives care so much about Zionism?
01:29:26.980Many people have wondered that, and this book will actually answer that.
01:29:29.800But it's going to sound anti-Semitic, but it's not intentional.
01:29:35.500And I just want to really say it again.0.88
01:29:40.980It's a pretty fair book, and I would recommend people read it.
01:29:44.500And just from the back here, this book offers an original interpretation of the achievement of Leo Strauss,
01:29:51.240stressing how his ideas and followers reshaped the American conservative movement.
01:29:56.940According to this study, Strauss and his disciples came to influence the establishment right almost by accident.
01:30:04.900The conservative movement that reached out to Strauss and his legacy was extremely fluid and lacked a self-confident leadership.
01:30:11.880Conservative activists and journalists felt a desperate need for academic acceptability, which they thought Strauss and his disciples would furnish.
01:30:21.080Strauss is a mysterious figure. He refused to be filmed or interviewed.
01:30:25.020he devoted his time to creating a loyal band of students
01:30:29.120and what he taught them was that the prosperous liberal society
01:30:33.040they were living in contained the seeds of its own destruction
01:48:19.880That's like day fucking one that these guys get established.0.96
01:48:22.980but still they're moralist still and and this is what i keep coming back to like0.96
01:48:28.640you have an individual who is telling you that he is religious and that he believes in religious
01:48:36.220values but your specific religious values don't matter which seems to imply that the only religious
01:48:42.920views that matter are jewish religious values and there's two figures that sit really high up
01:48:51.960in the Strauss minds and you'll see this still in conservatives to this day and again once I saw
01:48:58.940that it was this guy that was kind of pioneering this it shook me it shook everything else into
01:49:04.880place about why the conservatives are like this so there's two figures that they're obsessed with0.69
01:49:08.760one is Winston Churchill and the second is Abraham Lincoln so like the Straussians are obsessed with
01:49:16.720Winston Churchill as the prime example of Anglosphere politics. Now, there's a lot of people
01:49:22.540on our side. I know Thomas 777 had nothing but bad things to say about Winston Churchill. And he's
01:49:27.200right. He's correct that anyone who knows anything doesn't like Winston Churchill. But apparently to
01:49:32.740the neoconservatives, he was the smartest and best leader that Europe has ever seen, which should
01:49:38.200make you look at them kind of sideways. But also Abraham Lincoln. And Lincoln as a figure is like
01:49:44.120the hero of the neoconservatives because what does lincoln represent he represents rebirth
01:49:50.920he represents the rebirthing of america as a vanguard of equality and um and they have this
01:49:57.320fixation they talk about this in the book they have this fixation on the phrase you know we hold
01:50:03.320these truths be self-evident all men are created equal and the book points out that the all men
01:50:09.400created equal part was really latched onto by the the neoconservatives and they still do to this day
01:50:14.220you'll still hear people say all men are created equal that was never a big deal in the constitution
01:50:20.620it was always there but it was never brought up it was never like the main thing you're supposed
01:50:27.260to focus on um it was kind of like a shorthand for yeah yeah we're all equal you know but they
01:50:32.920didn't believe in like marxist class leveling of anything however and this is kind of the irony of
01:50:40.140like the straussians where like they they're at once telling you that america was always like this
01:50:45.600however it didn't really get started until lincoln so you have again this is sort of like the double
01:50:51.700lie that they do which is it's always been like this but this guy also changed it changed everything
01:50:57.240to be the way it is it can't be both things at the same fucking time but that's why everyone on0.86
01:51:03.900the conservative side is obsessed with lincoln for surprisingly uh liberal reasons but that's0.98
01:51:11.040why you know there's nothing really conservative about these people they're still just fucking libs0.76
01:51:16.140um and that's why he says like before um the neoconservatives up until the 70s the way0.92
01:51:26.000american politics really worked it was the constitutional republicanism versus liberal
01:51:31.660democracy um so that would probably be closer to traditional conservatism then strauss enters the
01:51:38.160fray and united everyone under liberal democracy plus values plus warrior revolutionaries so he
01:51:47.420also had this sort of like cool edgy revolution i think this is a new thing and we like revolutionaries
01:51:53.500we like big crazy things happening you know what i mean which again the internal contradictions of
01:52:00.340what he was doing right and and when he came on the scene what he was proposing and this again
01:52:06.920is still evident in conservatives now was a war on academia like we need to we need to have a place
01:52:13.040in academia we need to have a place in journalism um and that's what he was proposing and conservatives
01:52:18.280have always been bad at that but then he kind of he was effective is what i'm saying like this guy's
01:52:24.400not an idiot this guy wrote the playbook for everything conservatives do right now and i would0.86
01:52:29.840argue that this occurs both in america and in canada we are a carbon copy of this straussian0.98
01:52:36.460neoconservative movement up here like i don't think pierre polyev is far and away different
01:52:41.940than any of this you know what i mean no not at all and so when he brings in this sort of warrior
01:52:49.740spirit he says now conservatives have been realigned as the vanguards of democratic values
01:52:56.180during the cold war and strauss's instrumental in doing that war was now understood to be a
01:53:03.460democratic crusade and that's a really interesting thing like now this these things you believe in0.93
01:53:09.100you're a cool fucking warrior who needs to fight for them whereas prior to that it would be far0.93
01:53:15.300more isolationist farmer and now who would benefit again who would benefit from you know0.99
01:53:22.220being a warrior class for western democracy well you know israel would benefit from that
01:53:26.940especially if israel is under threat and they are democracy you must fight for democracy0.95
01:53:32.400come fight for us yeah now this if this was coming from anyone else except a orthodox zionist jew
01:53:41.800and let's say maybe that's a coincidence look at like the quality the or the qualities i should
01:53:46.780say of the wars prior to and after the formation of israel prior to and after the second world war
01:53:53.460like the u.s was not involved in as many wars and the ones they were involved with were essentially
01:53:58.740on their own doorstep like that directly concerned the people of the nation uh whereas afterwards
01:54:05.220i mean you can make the claim that they were all related to israel or at the very least they were0.75
01:54:10.220tangentially related to israel in the sense that they were foreign wars for no fucking reason other
01:54:15.760than prophet so i mean yeah it's it's just that's crazy yeah so he's got another um in the book they
01:54:26.440describe what's called the virtual right which became kind of headquartered in the claremont
01:54:31.300institute later on and you'll see the claremont institute come up a lot as like in conservative
01:54:36.020think tank discussions um so what neoconservatism kind of evolved into was their advocates for
01:54:45.280tolerant nationalism liberal international interventionalism and a defense of all civil
01:54:54.440rights revolutions and then as well as strong zionism those are like the four things that
01:55:00.360they all come to represent which of course like really seem to benefit this one nation um
01:55:06.520so i'll just read a few things here so the cure for this problem of discrimination against jews
01:55:14.120strauss indicates in the preface was political zionism a solution that he backed in principle
01:55:20.440What had to be done at the same time, however, was to make life tolerable for those Jews who, like Strauss, did not embrace the Zionist option.
01:55:30.380Their alternative was, quote, liberal democracy, by which the writer meant something more fortifying than freedom as the more than freedom, as the term would be understandable to the 19th century European bourgeoisie.
01:55:43.960Strauss may have favored a strong democracy of the kind that appealed to Jaffa, Burns and Bloom.
01:55:49.300This democracy would be actively committed to universal principles and would see itself in a tradition of democratic heroes stretching back to Lincoln and the signers of the Declaration of Independence.
01:56:03.260This sanitized or virtual right had found a powerful voice in Harry Jaffa's Claremont Institute, a foundation that combines a generally interventionalist approach to dealing with America's undemocratic enemies abroad with generally progressive positions on racial and immigration questions.
01:56:24.200After 30 years, this foundation is a well-endowed presence in the movement's conservative community, and figures who are affiliated with the Institute, like Charles Kelser and William Bennett, appear frequently on network TV, including the Today Show.
02:12:49.820No, I had a work visa, but it expired and, you know, chose not to renew it.
02:12:54.500Given what my friends that did remain in China told me about, you know, how life was now, I chose not to go back.
02:13:01.080And I've been very happy since then. I don't regret it at all.
02:13:03.980Let me ask you this. From what you know of having your friends in China, is there any movement on the ground there?
02:13:11.020Other people wanting to leave? Is it just foreigners or do you see Chinese people changing the tone of their relationship with the government at all?
02:13:18.740Well, it has changed a lot this year when last month, China again made an amazing flip on the topic and just opened up immediately.0.54
02:13:29.080It went from one extreme to the other.
02:13:31.840So a lot of people have been leaving during these three years, especially foreigners.
02:13:36.940I mean, probably 80% of the white population in China has just left.
02:13:41.380Are they heading to other Asian countries when they leave China or do you think they're going back to the West?
02:13:46.540well i mean a lot of people a lot of people will move to thailand first because you know it's a
02:13:53.380typical holiday destination for people in china i know if you know if you were working remote
02:13:59.040something you could live in thailand pretty well so a few people did that but most people you know
02:14:05.020they had a normal office job in china and when they quit that they have they have nowhere else
02:14:09.260to go so most people that i know on that topic before we get too deep into that i am going to
02:14:14.540introduce you now. I am here speaking with the legendary Spandrel. A lot of people in our scene
02:14:21.900will know that name. And we not long ago spoke with a good friend of the show by the name of
02:14:26.960Clossington, where we discussed some of the ideas pioneered in your famous website. And anyone can
02:14:33.880go look at this right now. It's called Bloody Shovel. It's at spandrel.com. S-B-A-N-D-R-E-L-L.com.
02:14:42.240You can find all of his writing there from over the years, which is updated fairly recently as well.
02:14:48.860He's also back on Twitter, at Spandrel3.
02:14:54.200And failing that, you can also find Spandrel here on Urbit.
02:14:59.140And first of all, I just want to say thank you very much for taking the time to speak with me today.
02:22:27.800cultists of every and every kind of weirdo everybody but intelligent conservative russians
02:22:33.620of good families and so um you had a line here that i thought was so good which was that
02:22:39.240leninism as such was a way to hack this social calculus model it was a way to take all the
02:22:46.160people who had no status and rally them around the advocacy of getting them status and it wasn't
02:22:53.000really any highfalutin philosophical thing. It was just
02:22:56.880you found the human capital that was ravenous enough
02:23:01.120to try and claw status themselves on a strictly
02:23:04.060almost personal level. Would that be correct? Yes, yes.
02:23:09.140And if, you know, I mean, I'm not Russian myself, and
02:23:12.400I wasn't there. But if you read any history on the Russian Revolution, it really
02:23:17.120strikes you, you know, what weird and disagreeable and just nasty0.91
02:23:21.140people were at the forefront of all that yeah and an interesting thing and so bio leninism and again
02:23:28.320people check out the uh series of three articles titled bio leninism on spandrel.com but um when i
02:23:34.980read it uh all those years ago i saw it sort of developing alongside i'm sure you're aware of him
02:23:40.400edward dutton he's done a lot of work recently on his uh central thesis of spiteful mutants
02:23:46.720And he's taking it from strictly evolutionary biological standpoint, which is saying that there's these people that are just biologically inferior, they're gross, they're freaks, they're genetic dead ends. And I see bio-Leninism as the systems model of what these people do. And you can join both of these theories. They go hand in hand.
02:24:11.400So bio-Leninism is sort of the technique and strategy they use. But on a biological level, you just have this mass of people that are just low IQ, maybe mentally ill. And the more they succeed in the system, the more the system fails. And that I think you had stated in your blog that liberalism as a system has no way to sort out those people. Would that be correct?
02:24:39.020yeah exactly and you know in a in an older day people who are just you know of a healthy
02:24:46.940disposition they would just die off because you know people were poor and there was not enough
02:24:51.260food to go around but now we are all very rich and there's food for everyone so we have a lot of
02:24:57.740uh very unfit people around which again wouldn't have never existed though very seldom existed
02:25:04.220during history but now we have millions of them and they're here and you know they're humans too
02:35:01.460to work at the banks and make new businesses.
02:35:05.000That is a thing and that brings them value.
02:35:08.380But again, the value they bring is not worth
02:35:10.600you know getting smart engineers and and get them in a city where they only have one kid instead of
02:35:15.760five yeah you had this um little another segment of your blog that i found very interesting
02:35:22.180um and it was sort of um you were talking about how in the west and especially with liberals
02:35:30.840they prefer to have foreigners as the servants and in these lower class and manual labor jobs
02:35:39.260And it reminded me of a conversation I was having with my friend Christopher Sandbatch recently.
02:35:45.620And I disagreed with him at first, but maybe I'm coming around to it.
02:35:48.760But he had said that the line was everyone kind of wants to have slaves.
02:35:53.560And I'm like, I don't know about that, but maybe because you were kind of saying that people are more comfortable if their servants are of a different ethnicity to them.
02:36:03.900And I think the line you had had was prole co-ethnics are the personification of downward mobility, and everyone hates downward mobility.0.80
02:36:13.680So the physical replacement of proles who look like you is actually a very good proposition for most people.0.61
02:36:20.260You call this the housewife theory of the great replacement.0.97
02:36:24.000Somebody put it in French, please.0.98
02:38:16.140Colombia is poor you know Colombia is poor
02:38:18.160in all columns before even though you know the upper class in colombia yeah that that's a good
02:38:23.160point um now i'll move on to the next one because i know you're very short on time so it sounds it
02:38:28.080might seem like i'm trying to speed us along but there's a bunch of stuff that i had a lot of
02:38:31.960listeners who were very excited about you coming on too and a couple of them had submitted questions
02:38:36.700they wanted to ask you um and i'm just going to preface this by saying uh one of the things you
02:38:42.320mentioned in your blog is that you started your blog with the goal of unpacking leftism and how
02:38:47.860it has taken over the West and keeps winning. And I think that's really a central theme in your blog
02:38:52.540about how a lot of people might not consider the left as always winning. But you had also made a
02:38:58.920good point that even nationalism you saw as a successful left-wing movement against what you
02:39:05.860may call the Ancien Regime. Would that be correct? And am I being fair there? Yeah. And that's not
02:39:12.220my point is a real point but yeah yeah um and i was curious that um how this has evolved for you
02:39:20.920about your views of the left and how they keep winning since around 2017 um especially in the
02:39:27.040wake of covid and other geopolitical developments because i know when we were speaking in the email
02:39:31.580you were pretty uh cynical about the future of things whereas you might have been more optimistic
02:39:36.640in the past i was just wondering um since the your huge output in the blog how much has
02:39:42.820your outlook developed or changed and in terms of the future of big optimistic in terms of the left
02:39:51.760um and there do you still think the left is still winning with their policies and outlook have you
02:39:57.200have you seen any successful right-wing pushback um anything like that or or is this is the left
02:40:03.900still winning and winning oh man the winning by the crashing us i mean it's really bad but just
02:40:10.260look at it i mean you're in canada right in canada you have this uh this trucker thing going on last
02:40:17.200year was it yeah what happened to that exactly uh it was what had happened to that i think was
02:40:24.440it was successfully rerouted because you know even when the trucker protest was going on on the show
02:40:30.180uh we can get in trouble for saying stuff like this but i was saying that you know
02:40:34.240what they should be doing is building guillotines outside parliament hill you know but they
02:40:39.100they that that was the if if you follow to its natural conclusion but they were
02:40:44.680uh the funny thing about canada uh this is another thing we bring up a lot the only reason
02:40:49.080that the trucker protest was permitted to get as far as it did was more about canada's inability
02:40:55.980to marshal its forces. Because you have to understand one thing about Canada, it's that
02:40:59.440it doesn't have a lot of money. It's very spread out and the infrastructure is not very good.
02:41:05.200So my thing was Justin Trudeau, the leader, would absolutely love to have rolled in a bunch of
02:41:11.560tanks, but we don't have tanks. We had like three submarines and two of them fell apart
02:41:16.320due to lack of maintenance. We're not good at it. So it was a shock to the system in more ways than
02:41:22.000But I know Curtis Yarvin had made a comment about how, you know, they're not going to make that same mistake in the future.
02:41:29.740I mean, we'll see. But most of the truckers were just, you know, standard conservatives who were just if you look at what they were actually asking for, they were saying, we just don't want the border closed to truckers.
02:41:43.100but my policy was you know what you my the thing that i said was when you're throwing a punch
02:41:49.480you don't throw a punch just to connect with someone's face you throw a punch to throw your
02:41:54.240fist through the back of their head but that's how you throw a strong punch you need the correct
02:41:58.740trajectory but if you if your punch falls short then the impact changes anyway that's a bit of a
02:42:04.740a rambling thing but um ultimately i think what happens is conservatives and the right
02:42:10.700they're too they're too eager to fall for promises and their inability to just kick their enemies
02:42:18.680when they're down i think really hurts them because conservatives and the right broadly even
02:42:23.540the dissident right i don't think know how to win and to win you need to be a bully you need to be
02:42:28.480mean and i think that's what the left has on the right which is that the moment they win they
02:42:34.620forget that they've won and act like on to the next thing there's no celebration to the leftist
02:42:40.260you know if they ask they have asked for five dollars and you they shake you down for five
02:42:45.140dollars they'll get anger that you didn't give them 20 and when i talk to conservatives i'm like
02:42:50.020your highfalutin and nobility is going to get you annihilated right my argument is a bit circular
02:42:57.780but my definition of the right is the people who have better things to do than politics right and
02:43:04.660the left is the people who have who don't have better things to do than politics so you know if
02:43:09.300If you're right-wing, it's usually people who just want to grill,
02:43:12.340you just want to do your job, make good money,
02:43:15.020and as far as possible, have the government leave you alone.
02:43:21.460And if that's your goal, if you just want to grill,0.98
02:43:23.740and then you have a bunch of antifas who really, really want to kill you,0.52
02:51:37.560after the griftification of the right.
02:51:39.520so i see a lot of people just giving up i i think people are giving up even though they were once
02:51:46.700idealistic because you know once we run up against the wall of just you know this is something that
02:51:52.540even dunn talks about that we don't have the same evolutionary pressures we have people surviving
02:51:57.740and thriving now who should never have survived and thrived in the past and they're bringing all
02:52:02.360their junk dna and genetics with them and then if you are on the right and you are some kind of0.95
02:52:08.340collectivist some kind of populist you something maybe even a fascist maybe even like christians0.97
02:52:12.660are big on this too like i don't judge you know the lower classes but even those people i think1.00
02:52:18.460are pulling their hair out like i don't i don't know what to do with these fucking retarded freaks0.99
02:52:23.520you know and i kind of get to that point too i'm like for some of these people i'm like0.99
02:52:28.920especially if you work if you a lot of people on the right don't actually work so they don't
02:52:33.980interface with the public a lot but once you do you see some people like you walk through a walmart0.99
02:52:39.480and go god damn it like you just i'm like i guess white people have to die now you know like you0.98
02:52:46.540walk through the the lower classes sometimes you're like i don't know a way out of someone1.00
02:52:52.060wearing like a spongebob squarepants thong to the store you know yeah i mean being white is just not
02:52:59.200enough, that's for sure. But yeah, I mean, the locus of loyalty is, you know, I think it's going0.97
02:53:08.000to change. It made some sense to be a fascist 20 years ago, maybe even 10 years ago. But after all
02:53:14.760that's happened and seen the trend lines, it's just not going to work. I was going to say, in the near
02:53:19.900future, over the next 50 years, I know you're pretty cynical. I'm cynical as well, frankly. I
02:53:25.480take more of a nick landian approach on things where i i kind of i see the horizon of where
02:53:32.280technology is leading us and it's just we need to adapt because it's not going to stop
02:53:37.400but i was wondering do you have any maybe it's the genetic engineering thing but do you see do
02:53:43.320you have any predictions for the next 10 to 50 years about how bad things could get right so
02:53:51.240again the right is demoralized and just not doing well the left is batting insane and it's getting
02:53:59.000worse but yeah now we have ai now which is pretty neat so if you're a smart guy with some computer
02:54:08.360knowledge you'll be able to probably make good money if you have a good idea you don't need to
02:54:13.880hire 100 people from india or anything to to make some cool application and at the more general level
02:54:23.560yeah i mean we are getting to the place where every selection is already available
02:54:30.360even though it's kind of brazen so you can have kids and ensure that you know they're healthy and
02:54:36.040as smart as you are at least and in short notice we'll be able to just outright change genes in
02:54:44.440your offspring so now and once that's that cat's out of the bag you know once you can make sure
02:54:51.640that all your children have a 150 iq under six four tall well who's not going to do that right
02:54:59.160because you might have uh you may have some you know religious scribbles about it but you never
02:55:04.680will not and eventually you know one hassle will do it then two or three next thing you know
02:55:12.240everybody's doing it that's a good point and i know you probably have to get going soon but i
02:55:18.060just have if you have time i just have one last question um that i was kind of tickling the back
02:55:23.760of my mind uh one thing you had said on your blog was that we discussed this at the beginning how
02:55:29.640liberal leadership has traditionally been bad at coordinating itself, which kind of leaves it open
02:55:35.920for corruption. And speaking of COVID, a lot of people talk about, you know, Klaus Schwab,
02:55:43.220the World Economic Forum, and the Davos Summit and everything. And a lot of people are seeing
02:55:48.700dismiss that and they say it's not important and who gives a shit. I don't believe that, obviously.0.99
02:55:53.580But when I look at that, when I look at the things they're talking about,
02:55:57.180I wonder if that is just a new way for this sort of elite to coordinate itself on a global scale, because this is sort of new territory for them and to do it out in the open.
02:56:10.640And for dissidents and people on the right, kind of the people we've been talking about, the people on the right who maybe have a higher IQ or could actually see what's going on.
02:56:19.980Do you think there's any realistic way for the dissidents or people like ourselves to coordinate together in the same way that the liberals and leftists seem to be coordinating on a global stage right now with Davos and stuff like that?
02:56:37.320Does that seem like something we can even try to accomplish?
02:57:07.580but they can hold him in prison for six months.
02:57:11.120So, you know, and they took all his assets0.99
02:57:12.920and pretty sure they're going to fuck him up.0.64
02:57:16.280Do you recommend people do what you did, which is move to a geographic area where you perhaps get a bit more freedom?0.98
02:57:25.120Because I'd heard I heard you speak on a podcast recently.
02:57:28.200I think it was it's called like Med Hours or something like that.
02:57:33.260But you were saying that, you know, where you live right now, I'm not going to dox you or anything, but where you live right now, you feel that you can live more comfortably and freely as a white man, a European man.
02:57:43.640Is that something you would recommend to others?
02:57:46.280uh i did move to so i moved to japan age 18 and have stayed then moved to china then and i've
02:57:53.800been around the area since that's all my adult life i don't like it because i'm i'm good at
02:58:00.280languages and uh and then you know i add that pretty easily i'm not a man of habit so i don't
02:58:07.800i don't mind moving at all but i do know some people do right i know plenty of people who've
02:58:12.120been 20 years in say China and they still don't speak Chinese. If you're that kind of guy I would
02:58:18.280not recommend you to move here. You know foreigners are weird and you might not be okay with that1.00
02:58:25.800but if you're you know high openness like they say then yeah East Asia is a cool place.
02:58:31.560I know people are very happy in South America and I do recommend people to try you know travel the
02:58:37.480the world see what you like in geopolitical terms do you see you know for example the west or
02:58:44.260america specifically on a downward trajectory and perhaps the areas that you're living in or
02:58:50.320you recommend people live in they're on the upswing is that a reality people need to live in do you
02:58:56.860think i don't think so in economic terms i don't think i mean of course the west in the the global
02:59:08.260economy is going to help because i mean if ai might change things but in general terms public
02:59:14.680finances you know all civilized countries have really bad demographics right the pension systems
02:59:20.960just don't work so we're all gonna get poor in many ways even if not nominally in real terms0.59
02:59:29.560uh east asia is not any better i mean japan is effectively bankrupt in many ways uh china is
02:59:37.160doing well-ish but again the demographic stuff is bad and they're gonna start spending more1.00
02:59:43.420money in the old people and there's just too many of them i don't think there's any real1.00
02:59:48.360emerging country maybe vietnam which is you know still has some potential i am not bullish on india1.00
02:59:55.580for many reasons me neither so i don't think there's really any emerging power that's got0.99
03:00:02.700to take over and you know should just move there and take over you know china will do okay0.93
03:00:07.620we'll grow some more but then we'll just stabilize it more or less the same lifestyle we have0.98
03:00:12.080You know, one way to look at the IQ shredding phenomenon is a genocide of the troublemakers. And one thing we discussed this on the last episode, we read this book called Seeing Like a State.
03:00:26.560And it was over the course of, you know, centuries and centuries, various projects that states and various countries had done to try and simplify processes and help the people. And usually it all ends in tears.
03:00:40.200But one of the central stories of the book across different cultures was that usually centralized power finds communities and folk ways very frustrating and useless and tries to almost strip them away.0.93
03:00:56.480And you had a comment in your blog that essentially was saying that white men are troublemakers.
03:01:02.700White men are always the ones who reject things.0.94
03:01:06.500They cause problems for the centralized power.
03:01:08.880And I think you saw the exact same thing with COVID. It was most like the trucker protests is one example, but all throughout the world, it only seemed that the ones really raising a stink about it until recently with China, but we're mostly like white guys. And we're willing to go to the mat for it.
03:01:24.480And I see the same thing happening with AI that I honestly think it's only really white
03:01:30.500guys and white guys of a certain IQ that are ringing the bells about the fears of IQ.
03:02:18.360why the low with no middle is ideal for the for the reading class right because they have less
03:02:25.600of a danger of being replaced but we'll still have smart people around that's an interesting
03:02:30.820model i don't think a lot of people talk about that maybe the dissolution because the the middle
03:02:36.240class as a phenomenon seems to be written within a very short window of time especially in the west
03:02:42.860So there's not really this thing called the middle class throughout time.
03:02:45.900So maybe once the middle class is finally dissolved and you only have what are, you know, the self-elected aristocrats and then the serfs of various ethnicities, maybe that is just the natural state of things.
03:03:00.720And in that case, the people who listen to podcasts will obviously be at the top.
03:03:06.020I mean, look at, look at history, you know, the Middle Ages, look at South America today.
03:03:10.920It just happens that the racial divide between the top and the low is very obvious, but it has to be.0.84
03:03:18.360I honestly think that once the boomers are just pass away, that we will see the social strata resort to that in a faster way.0.91
03:03:28.320Like this thing called the middle class may finally die out with boomers and maybe it'll hang on for a bit longer.0.76
03:03:34.500But it's you already have generations here that are feeling like the middle class is dissolving and that it's a phenomenon that they don't get to enjoy.0.88
03:03:44.020And then it'll just go away and things will get back to normal.
03:03:48.040And then I guess we'll have to rely on technology for all the smart people to rise to the top.
03:03:52.840But let me ask you this before we go. High IQ people that we're talking about, the ones who that will likely survive, do you think they will retain like will they be more interested in genetics and like so for like Europeans, let's say, would they become more, let's say, racist or would they do you think the high IQ whites will still be trying to keep like making white babies and genetically perfect babies?0.78
03:04:20.300or do you think that's only going to be the interest of the global south uh culturally i mean0.68
03:04:28.140is it a racial thing right so when an indian when an indian woman buys a skin whitening cream
03:04:36.220she doesn't want to be sweaty she doesn't want to be white she does she just wants to have light1.00
03:04:39.860skin because she finds it beautiful right and and the same with the south american peasant right0.72
03:04:46.080When Hugo Chavez married a white woman after getting power, he didn't do so because of his deep appreciation of the Indo-European Aryan step people.0.71
03:05:02.220So to what extent rich Europeans with access to gene catalogs for their babies are going to choose why their skin?0.88
03:05:12.420probably not right because white people are actually more into variety and you might see0.61
03:05:19.220rich europeans choosing you know black babies just for the kick of it0.53
03:05:26.420but again once you have genes you can choose individual genes you know and this makes your0.84
03:05:31.220eyes blue and this makes your skin that color and this makes you freckles and that
03:05:36.580race stops matter it's not a matter of race anymore you know it's just like
03:05:40.660making your own play in a video game yeah it introduces an interesting problem especially
03:05:46.220for those not just white people but even black people as well who are very race conscious very
03:05:51.900ethnicity conscious that you know is the ethnicity surviving and those is the folk surviving if they
03:06:00.640are just made in a lab so you know would for example would a white nationalist in america0.90
03:06:06.980accept the future that white people are thriving but only in Mexican families like they're being0.66
03:06:15.020born and they're blonde hair they're blue-eyed and maybe genetically they're as close to being0.96
03:06:19.780a pure Germanic people as they can but because they're being essentially lab grown does that
03:06:26.320does that make them happy or do they still see something wrong with that and that's a very that's0.54
03:06:30.340a question that I don't think anyone expected to have to answer you know what I mean I mean
03:06:35.360And ideally, I do think that, you know, the whole concept of race and ethnicity is going to matter much less once, you know, genetic and doing the thing.
03:06:42.620And hopefully the left sees it the same way, right?
03:06:45.880And that makes them not ban the whole thing.
03:06:49.000Because they do say they want, you know, they want a post-racial war, right?