00:01:25.080Gotta tell you right at the top here, I am amazed.
00:01:30.520I am always just amazed of the increasing shamelessness, the never-ending grift, the desperation to try to sell to the public that Erica really cares about justice.
00:01:41.280When in reality, thus far, what she has demonstrated is that she cares deeply about raising money and deeply about her PR, right?
00:01:49.660She's willing to partner with just about anyone, no matter how gutter trash they are, in the pursuit of both.
00:01:57.240So this morning I wake up and I see a trend on X that Charlie Kirk's family has filed a notice of claim against the state of Utah,
00:02:05.400also Utah Valley University Police Department, and more specifically, UVU Police Chief Jeffrey Long,
00:02:11.660and former president of UVU, Astrid Tuminez,
00:02:15.540and others that are presently, quote-unquote, presently unknown,
00:02:20.340who were involved in the death of Charlie Kirk.
00:02:23.760I don't know how they would be presently unknown, but okay, stick with me.
00:02:28.000So to first explain to you why they would file a notice of a claim
00:02:32.140rather than just filing a claim itself,
00:02:33.880that's really just because of the law on the books.
00:02:36.420It's a mandatory prerequisite for this kind of a lawsuit
00:02:39.340that you first have to assert your intent to sue the government
00:02:43.540so that the government has a chance to simply concede
00:02:46.920and maybe settle it in the background,
00:02:49.020thus not wasting any unnecessary state resources
00:03:07.680Because foremost, I have known since approximately last December that actually it was Charlie Kirk's parents who were encouraging Erica to file a wrongful death lawsuit against the state of Utah.
00:03:21.260And at that time, I was told that it was not something that Erica herself was keen to do.
00:03:26.600Now, I did not report on it because I tend to stay away from reporting on anything involving Charlie Kirk's parents because they're not public figures.
00:03:35.820They never have aspired to be public figures. They did not usurp Charlie's very public position as the CEO and chairman of an organization that pulled in a quarter billion last year and therefore opened themselves up to fair criticism.
00:03:51.500But now that fact is extremely relevant to present to the public that this was Charlie Kirk's parents who wanted Erica to do this.
00:03:57.920And I'm wondering, why did Erica decide now to file that intent to sue?
00:04:15.760But curiously, I was also informed this week that what is due to be released imminently
00:04:21.980to the public, is the long-awaited independent review regarding the security failures at UVU,
00:04:30.040which may have contributed to Charlie's death. Now, it was UVU themselves who commissioned
00:04:36.620this independent review back in September of last year. I want you to check out this article,
00:04:42.120jogging your memory here. It was published in the Associated Press on September 22nd, 2025,
00:04:48.640Right. So this is 12 days after Charlie lost his life.
00:04:53.040And it tells us in this article, Utah Valley University is launching an independent external review of the fatal shooting of prominent conservative activist Charlie Kirk on its campus earlier this month.
00:05:04.920The university announced the move Monday in an effort to improve safety practices amid fallout over security lapses and the shattering of the serene image that the institution had cultivated.
00:05:15.640Quote, we believe the findings of the comprehensive third party independent review of this targeted act of violence will offer valuable insights on how college campuses improve response and preparedness moving forward.
00:05:29.080This is that was a quote from Astrid Munez, the school's president, said in an emailed statement, quote, we will integrate the findings into our efforts to strengthen and improve safety practices for UVU and all of Utah higher education, end quote.
00:05:43.860Okay, so just 12 days after Charlie is hit, the university sought to examine all of those failures that were, by the way, immediately, and some failures which were eventually noted by the larger public.
00:05:59.760At long last, that report is due to be released.
00:06:04.320I was told that its findings were going to be released on Friday.
00:06:07.960I don't know if that's now going to be bumped.
00:06:10.540And that the findings were actually going to be devastating to Turning Point USA, to their security apparatus, because obviously they would have been gathering communications.
00:06:21.580Why didn't this happen? Why didn't that happen?
00:06:24.420So when I just look at that, that I had this information that I was expecting this filing
00:06:29.140on Friday, or I guess this independent review to be released on Friday, and suddenly we're
00:06:34.360hit on Wednesday with an intent to sue that is sloppy, okay?
00:09:58.740but your security would be liaising with the local police force
00:10:03.880and telling them what you want and what you need.
00:10:07.140So you might say, as I did at a recent event, we want bomb dogs, okay?
00:10:13.020You might say, as they talked about in this interview, we want drones.
00:10:17.460We're going to need a guy up on the rooftop.
00:10:19.900We've assessed situation where we want guys up there.
00:10:22.180And then the local police will then come back at you with potential limitations.
00:10:26.320They may say, we're not able to meet some of your requests or some of your demands because of this, because of that, which means that you then either need to go source that independently.
00:10:37.600You got to go source your own bomb dogs, source your own drones, or you're going to say we're not going to do this event because it's not secure enough.
00:10:46.740That's why we're bringing you in, experts, to say we can't make this secure.
00:10:51.200We're prevented from making it secure, so we advise you not do this.
00:10:54.620especially if you send a message the night before saying,
00:21:56.680They have the capacity, essentially, for one police officer to cover a little over 2,000 students.
00:22:02.860So Charlie's event was oversupplied within their capabilities on a purely mathematical basis.
00:22:07.920That would be why Astrid denied their request for more, because it would have put the additional 47,000 other students at risk.
00:22:16.720If something happened to them and there were no police in sight because everyone was being given to the Charlie Kirk event, the university could have been sued.
00:26:15.520Maybe actually this is the one that's the most egregious for two reasons, right?
00:26:19.260So the context here, just so you know, is they are now addressing the text message exchange between Dan Flood and Chief Jeffrey Long of the UVU Police Force.
00:26:30.220This is the same message that Brian Harpole misrepresented as his own on Sean Ryan when he's like, what am I supposed to do with that?
00:26:38.920What do you mean, what are you supposed to do with that, Brian?
00:26:41.040you never received this message or something you're supposed to do with anything because
00:33:57.340that made the event safe for him to attend and participate in.
00:34:01.620Instead, Mr. Kirk was exposed to the danger
00:34:04.380of a rooftop shooter that took his life
00:34:06.080In light of the risks known to the UVU parties, the UVU parties' failures shock the conscience, giving rise both to a state-created danger claim under the United States Constitution's Due Process Clause and a traditional wrongful death claim under Utah law.
00:34:24.000Thank you for receiving the above notice of claim.
00:34:26.500Please feel free to reach out if you have questions.
00:43:57.800Because do you know how many traffic footage stops there would be from me between the ages of 18 and 21 years old if they didn't just automatically delete this?
00:44:07.440I had so many speeding tickets across so many states that Connecticut actually made me go back to driving school for a weekend or else I was going to lose my license, okay?
00:44:16.740Gratefully, there's no footage of me getting stopped
00:50:50.040Wow, how crazy that this footage emerged and he's in the same hat and sunglasses imprinting
00:50:57.040upon the public mind that this is our guy.
00:51:01.080So that's my thought. I would like to know why footage that did not involve a crime was available on the ready a couple of days after we learned, seven days after we learned that Tyler Robinson was a suspect. How did Scripps get that?
00:51:15.640If you have information as to how that took place, who held on to that footage, why they held on to that footage, which should have been deleted after 60 days in the state of Utah, which no one should have requested because no one should have known that it happened, please reach out to us.
00:51:30.380We'd like to, we'd like to, it's a bee in my bonnet, bzzz in my bonnet.