00:05:48.360And like I said, there is entirely no dispute that he lied to me about his fear of a Google hack because he actually signed and submitted an 1102 statement to that effect.
00:05:58.440It was entered in and discussed during the hearing.
00:06:01.240we can show you this statement from Terrell.
00:07:28.680I want you to remember which cameras we saw around Charlie, generally speaking.
00:07:33.420Now, there is one moving camera that I want to point out, which may potentially be the fourth camera, which was operated by a guy that seemed to be floating from side to side.
00:07:52.020Uh, but the more pertinent ones are the three static cameras that he is representing in his
00:07:58.460statement that he was operating. Here are the, here's the diagram of those static cameras,
00:08:02.700the three shots. Now we have one to the front left side of Charlie that is being operated by
00:08:08.960Robert Golo. Um, and, um, in theory, I would say that it is actually the camera that is circled
00:08:18.560in blue right there. The yellow one is operated by Robert Golo. That's the one that he is going
00:08:23.680to be facing the person that's asking questions. The one that is in blue is the one that I would
00:08:28.080say would carry the most critical graphic up-close evidence of Charlie Kirk being shot, right?
00:08:34.480That's the one that was being operated by Jordan Wilson. In other words, if I were trying to gather
00:08:40.420evidence very quickly within minutes of Charlie Kirk being shot, I'd go blue. That's an opinion.
00:08:47.320I'm saying, were I in control of the AV department and I was trying to be useful to police, I'd probably grab that footage as critical evidence.
00:08:55.760And then I would grab that footage of what's circled in yellow, which we just discussed.
00:09:02.680That is, as he described, pointing to the person that's asking questions.
00:09:08.060We know that that has some rotating capability.
00:09:10.980I'd probably grab that one second, right?
00:09:38.920And traditionally, in case you're wondering or need reminding, all it showed was a view of what was happening below and around Charlie's feet and captured some audience, right?
00:09:51.000But not more than the yellow camera is going to capture.
00:09:52.980The red camera, if you want to capture the audience, you go with the yellow.
00:09:56.520And the reason why I'm saying traditionally that is what it showed is because there was a massive discovery from YouTuber Nissy when she realized that Terrell Farnsworth, when he finally did show me the completely non-graphic footage from behind Charlie's head, had presented to me what appeared to her to be a zoomed in shot from that camera.
00:10:22.780This is important that we go back and we revisit what it is that Nissy caught about that camera.
00:23:45.400If he's just out there fighting evil and worried about securing the footage, why didn't he grab the other SD card or three of them in a row?
00:23:57.640Who is he in communication with after he grabs that?
00:24:01.880Because I got to tell you something, Andrew.
00:24:05.200Were it me and I was amongst my peers sitting on a jury, I would not accept your narrative that he looks like he's worried.
00:24:15.400about people stealing, not about the hats, not about the other footage, not about the cameras.
00:24:23.560It looks to me like, and again, this is my opinion, it looks to me like he's completing a
00:24:31.300task and checking in with someone to say that a task is completed. Maybe, I don't know. I'm open
00:24:36.840to everything. Maybe there was some police officer who told him to take that footage in particular.
00:30:44.780so many things that i know and um i think the biggest thing is don't send a slob to my house
00:30:54.700i don't do that please don't do that again especially when i am pregnant with a boy
00:30:59.500um it's deeply upsetting to me it's unnecessary andrew erica in particular um you guys are
00:31:06.240really starting to partner with people who are interested in trying to psychologically
00:31:12.900go after me and my family, torment us publishing things about my children's cars and the vehicles
00:31:20.840that they travel in, I think you should stop doing that. If I could just put something in
00:31:25.960the suggestion box, just call off the dogs. Or don't. And we can keep having fun. Anyway,
00:31:32.000speaking of this totally inappropriate chain of custody, the FBI jumping on the case like cowboys,
00:31:39.560That's not how this works, actually. They are supposed to be used because your tax dollars pay for these things. When there is a case that obviously violates federal law, if it's happening on federal property, you don't get to have cowboy Cash Patel just go, I'm just going to come and bring everybody with me and take over the whole case and evidence.
00:32:00.280Yes, the State Bureau of Investigations, as you saw, can reach out to the FBI and help ask them to assist with certain testing and things of that nature.
00:32:08.160But the custody goes, FBI and then FBI.
00:32:12.320So why the FBI interjected so quickly is in and of itself kind of a conspiracy.
00:32:18.360There was a man named John Kirikou, who is a former CIA officer who had a conscience back in 2007 during the quote unquote war on terror.
00:32:27.280he became a terror. He became a government whistleblower about how some of the terrorists
00:32:34.060were being tortured. Anyway, John Kirikou went on to the Danny Jones podcast. And here is what
00:32:42.460he had to say about the FBI's involvement in the Charlie Kirk case. Why is the FBI involved in
00:32:48.720this. Charlie Kirk was killed in Utah by a kid from Utah who left his house in Utah, drove to
00:32:59.760the university in Utah, and allegedly shot Charlie Kirk. Nobody ever crossed a state line. There's
00:33:06.900literally nothing in this case that would make it federal, unless there was a conspiracy,
00:33:13.280in which case it would be a federal case
00:46:08.440I actually have to do that, that is hilarious.
00:46:11.280Nikki writes, paying someone $100,000 an hour
00:46:13.740to be humiliated is a rather expensive fetish.
00:46:17.520Indeed. Indeed it is. Trillian writes, this debate is positive evidence that Turning Point USA has terrible PR. Overwhelmingly, I am overwhelmed that it is positive evidence that their PR strategy has just been an open and shut disaster from start to finish. It's unbelievable. They cannot stop blundering.
00:46:39.140comments from today's episode the one you feed writes can is please make sure they did not do
00:46:43.260a bb and leave a bug in your house first off the zone that they were in is not a place that we are
00:46:50.100regularly other than when we actually film the show and secondly of course george has already
00:46:54.200had the house swept for bugs that was like the first thing he did especially when we learned the
00:46:58.640steven creeper and crew were here alicia switzer writes ian carroll did a great reaction video
00:47:05.220six hours and it was great. Kudos to him for calling the BS as we all saw it and stopping
00:47:09.880to call it out. I can't wait to get my new second favorite shirt. Stay amazing. We will continue
00:47:14.580supporting you. Much love from Missouri. I actually saw just clips of him and I've shared some of them
00:47:19.480and they're hilarious. And I do want to, when I have time this weekend, watch his reaction video
00:47:25.080because so many people have said that it was absolutely amazing. So shout out to Ian Carroll
00:47:28.500for that. And yes, you can support us. We do have, this is my second favorite shirt available on the
00:47:34.460website, merch. If you go to CandaceOwens.com, as we have learned, if you are going to commit a crime,
00:47:40.540please wear your second favorite shirt. So please wear this shirt in particular. Buy it, wear it,
00:47:46.420do crime, but be smart. Don't wear your favorite shirt because it's just not a good idea. And of
00:47:52.440course, it is in maroon. And we also have the shirts and the mugs from our debate classic. I
00:48:00.480can explain to you, but I can't understand it for you. Amazingly, he is still asking questions. He
00:48:04.880does not comprehend it. He does not comprehend hearsay. And the Crucible account is now getting
00:48:11.620fact checks, what do you call community notes on X, because they're like, right here, it says that
00:48:16.040they spoke to the mom. Look at this warrant, the probative cause, the probable cause warrant.
00:48:23.800And Twitter just had to come in and explain to him, no, this is not a direct quotation
00:48:30.220from the mom. This is an officer that is signing a probable cause warrant. He's had days and he
00:48:37.820still cannot comprehend this. So we are really hoping that Andrew Wilson will be able to
00:48:43.300understand it. We are done explaining it. It is now on him and coming upon Andrew Wilson to do
00:48:48.700his best to sit down and understand why we are saying he is a hypocrite for allowing the courts
00:48:54.300to do what he says that we can't, which is to take a look at evidence and to infer upon it.
00:49:01.460He just doesn't get it, man. It's just not all there. James Gray writes, the fact that a woman
00:49:07.160hating man paid 300K to be dog walked by a woman is insane. Congrats, Candace. You are a gentle
00:49:12.580woman and a scholar. Thank you. Thank you so much. Like I said, I am very proud of myself because I
00:49:17.700knew that it was Turning Point's horse. Even just them saying, we have nothing to do with him. And
00:49:21.660then his opening statement. It just is incredible. It's like there's just not a brain cell split
00:49:26.420between Erica and Andrew Colbett and Blake Neff. Like, obviously, it's not a good idea.
00:49:32.180Give yourselves some plausible deniability. TJ Peluso writes, because I know people can be evil.
00:49:37.940I would like everybody as a homework assignment to practice that in the mirror.
00:49:42.840I just the way he did it was it was compelling. Good performance. Didn't give me Denzel Washington,
00:49:49.400but I think that he put in a good effort.
00:50:17.700Why can't they comprehend that? Why is everyone's social IQ so low as to not realize that if you keep pushing the it's not Israel, though, right? It's not Israel. Then people go, maybe it's Israel. It's weird. Why would he come in here wanting to talk about Israel? His opening statement, he starts talking about Israel. Why? This is just a weird thing for you to do.
00:50:41.220Look, if he had proven the debate claim,