00:01:20.040And also how Johnny Depp's lawyer, Camila Vesquez, is now on the opposite side of Melissa Nathan, who also, as you know, used to represent Johnny Depp.
00:01:36.480Okay, so this just made me laugh so hard when I saw it on Reddit.
00:01:40.300Thanks to Orange Kirby, a Reddit user, who actually made me also look into this.
00:01:45.940So this person said on Reddit that they looked through Exhibit B, which contains the billing records from Lively's fee request.
00:01:55.640And they said that they used Chanty to P, Claude and Gemini to figure out how much money Blake Lively's attorneys billed Blake Lively for, for just creating this fee motion.
00:02:09.980So you have to remember, this was the only thing that was left in the lawsuit after they made this settlement back in May.
00:02:17.260And Blake's attorney said, as you know, that this was what it was all about.
00:02:21.820It was never about money. It was about accountability, blah, blah, blah.
00:02:27.180And now it turns out this is really funny because, as you know, Blake asked for eight million dollars and she got four hundred and seven thousand dollars.
00:02:35.620So the question is, how much money did actually Blake spend on asking for these attorney's fees?
00:02:47.660I also did my own research on this, putting all of this through AI as well.
00:02:52.920In June only, Wilkie, this one attorney firm, charged over $200,000 in different services.
00:03:02.420So that was in June. So meaning that this was after the settlement. And they marked about $61,000 as 47.1 entries and another $173,000 was spent on damages consultants. So when you put that together, it is $434,000.
00:03:25.880isn't that just funny and her lawyers are like this is what it's all about you know so what it's
00:03:32.740all about really is that if you ask for these attorney's fees the money you spend on asking
00:03:38.480for these attorney's fees is the money you might get back not even all of that you might get back
00:03:43.820especially if you hire really expensive firms like Blake Lively did obviously so yeah if you
00:03:49.460ever wonder who the winners are here ask why Gottlieb and Ezra Hudson Blake's main attorneys
00:03:55.440I bet you they just got some new amazing vacation homes somewhere in the world.
00:04:24.920So I just wanted to share a couple of small moments with you guys. One is when Matt Bellany is asking him if it's really worth it, you know, spending about 30 million dollars on attorneys to just shed a light on these alleged smear campaigns.
00:04:42.680so as you know Blake Lively's attorneys also came forward and said that she's not doing this only
00:04:47.820for herself she's doing this for everyone else who might also experience being victims of smear
00:04:53.760campaigns and then Michael Gottlieb said this there has been an absolute Streisand effect
00:05:00.040in this case you know I know you're going to say it's all worth it but you got to understand when
00:05:07.600reasonable people look at this case and say, why? Why did she initiate this case?
00:05:14.860So I don't actually think the data supports what you're saying. And what I mean by that is what
00:05:20.180the data supports, and this came out in expert reports in our case, is that the reaction to
00:05:25.960Ms. Lively bringing this lawsuit was positive. When that sentiment changed.
00:05:30.920Amongst who? Amongst her agents at William Morris?
00:05:33.440No, overwhelmingly in the public. What it shows is that that began to shift after the Wayfair parties filed their defamation lawsuit. And they went out on a press tour branding her as a liar in the press.
00:05:44.440Yeah, of course, he didn't answer the question. But he also said that the reactions to Blake Lively bringing the lawsuit were positive. And then he said it only changed when Justin Boldoni and the Wayfair parties came out and sued her for defamation, because then Brian Friedman labeled her a liar.
00:06:04.960And in his logic here, the public only changed their minds because Brian Friedman said that Blake Lively is a liar.
00:06:16.100He's not even playing with the idea that we as the public actually saw the evidence that contradicted what Blake Lively had said to begin with.
00:06:26.040And that's why we made up our minds like, oh, this is not true.0.97
00:06:33.080So here is my question to this logic. If the public just ate up what Brian Friedman said that Blake Lively was a liar, why didn't they eat it up when Michael Gottlieb, Blake's attorney, came out and said, hey, they filed this frivolous retaliatory sham lawsuit and everything they say about my client is not true.
00:06:56.940why did no one believe him when he said that and by the way he said that that lawsuit was frivolous
00:07:04.120retaliatory and a sham lawsuit that was never proven that is a big fat lie because the judge
00:07:12.180only dismissed justin baloney and the wayfair party's lawsuit due to technicalities basically
00:07:18.260that he wasn't allowed to sue her for defamation because she sued him first for shed anyways his
00:07:24.560logic makes no sense because why didn't people come back then and support Blake Lively when that
00:07:29.840lawsuit was dismissed? If it was frivolous and the sham lawsuit, why was no one listening to
00:07:36.000Michael Gottlieb when he told them so? Anyways, that's the question I would like to ask Michael
00:07:41.400Gottlieb if I ever got to interview him. Anyways, Bellamy continues to pressure, put pressure on
00:07:46.700Gottlieb here saying, you know, this was just this turn into a big circus. Why would she want to do
00:07:52.040something like that and why would you recommend anyone else to do something like that she spent1.00
00:07:56.000so much money on this lawsuit and she basically just ruined her own reputation in the making so
00:08:01.820why would anyone else follow in her footstep and then Gottlieb says this so like the lesson from
00:08:08.660this case isn't it that you have to think really really hard before you initiate a case like this
00:08:16.300If you are a major celebrity and you have brand businesses and a film career and you want that to be what people know about you, not the back and forth bombs being dropped.
00:08:30.440I think you got to wait and see what we accomplish in our 47-1 before you write the final chapter of that book.
00:08:35.260But not much left to do in this particular aspect of litigation except for quantify the damage that's been done to her.
00:08:43.020And I think that when that process unfolds, you're going to see a powerful tool of accountability that will shine a light for others that face this kind of problem.
00:08:51.400Yeah, you have to wait and see what 47.1 gives us.
00:08:55.000Isn't that funny now when we know that it only gave them what they actually spent on trying to get them?
00:09:01.320I mean, and while we're at it, I just had to point out another big lie from Michael Gottlieb in this interview.
00:09:07.940so remember just last week or is it two weeks ago maybe now that jed wallace this guy in texas that
00:09:15.900blake's accusing to be the brain behind the untraceable smear machine he wanted to depose
00:09:21.200blake lively because she's asking for eight hundred thousand dollars in attorney's fees
00:09:26.040from him and he said you know uh we should have the right to depose her because it's our right0.87
00:09:32.320to find out if she sued us with malice, if she knew that what she was suing us for was0.98