00:03:51I did want to also talk about, speaking of where news is made outside of Parliament, the interview at the New York Times this week.
00:03:59An hour-long interview, Scott, the first big headline that garnered the most reaction here in Canada was certainly this.
00:04:04he was the prime minister was asked whether or not you know there'd be any instances of
00:04:08preparation about the prospect of some kind of military attack from the united states and he
00:04:12said yes you know it's an extreme you know outside risk uh but yes we have prepared what0.97
00:04:19now this is where you would say this is the dumbest thing i've ever heard they all should0.83
00:04:24say that and then that should say segment over but here we go well it's astonishing i mean well
00:04:31first of all if they're doing contingency planning i'd like to know more about the draft plans like
00:04:35will it include heavy set 60 year old men with eyeglasses because if so only blue ones i need
00:04:40to make some plans fast um the blue glasses brigade that's what we're going to put on the
00:04:46front lines hopefully that puts me to the top of command i i think there are two things that are
00:04:52genuinely astonishing about this uh the first is that it is a an understandable but still staggering
00:05:02reminder of where our relationship is with the united states and how much donald trump changes
00:05:07everything this was an unimaginable discussion point that has now not only become imagined but
00:05:14actually we're feel somewhat obligated to think it through i'm also astonished that the prime
00:05:19minister said it if i'm going to be honest i i'm i i don't think that people find it that
00:05:24preposterous given the aggression of donald trump he paints the stars and stripes across our map and
00:05:30he talks often about his desire to preferential access and perhaps exclusive access to our
00:05:35critical minerals and energy so you can imagine a situation where at some point he just says
00:05:40all right i'm just going to take them you know you have to think about what was discussed prior
00:05:46to this New York Times article. I'll bet you Carney planted this. Ask me about an invasion
00:05:53of the U.S. into Canada. I'll bet you he planted that. Why would anybody bring this up? Although1.00
00:05:58it was brought up a little while ago from somebody from CTV, which I'll get to in just a moment.
00:06:04But the fact that these people think this is possible and that it gets worse from here,
00:06:10trust me, it gets a lot worse from here. The fact that Scott Reed, Mr. Blue Glasses here,
00:06:14is even suggesting this is possible is ridiculous in itself. Here we go.0.69
00:06:18I'm still surprised that the prime minister said this. I can only think of one of two reasons.
00:06:23One, he just got a little ahead of himself. Or two, and it relates to our earlier discussion.
00:06:29Perhaps he is trying to reinforce, on both sides of the border and particularly here at home,
00:06:35how unique these circumstances are, how high the stakes are. And therefore, it reinforces
00:06:41the political imperative to do things like pass the legislation that he's trying to pass to pursue
00:06:46the policy agenda that he wants, knowing that he's asking for things that other prime ministers have
00:06:51been told no to. So he's on to the right track here, but he doesn't say why he's doing this.
00:06:57Why does he bring up the fact that the United States is going to invade Canada? And we've got
00:07:02a contingency plan in case it happens, because it riles up his supporters. It riles up the new
00:07:08world order and allows him to pass a legislation that most Canadians probably would not agree with1.00
00:07:14if they were thinking straight and weren't listening to idiots like Scott Reed,1.00
00:07:19Corey Tanike, and Kathleen Monk on Vashi Kapelis' CTV question period. He kind of gets it,1.00
00:07:25but he doesn't understand. And the other thing that Mark Carney's doing here is, folks,
00:07:29he's in the United States. I mean, there's a story today. In fact, Kathleen Monk brings it
00:07:34up in this interview on he's only talking to the media in the United States. Why is he doing that?
00:07:40One, he, well, let me just show you the article here. This is an article from today. Has anyone
00:07:47told Carney he can do interviews with Canadian media? If we go down here, earlier this month,
00:07:52Prime Minister Mark Carney granted Bloomberg News an exclusive one-on-one sit-down interview.
00:07:57On Wednesday, he sat down with the New York Times and both interviews failed trade negotiations
00:08:02with the U.S. were discussed. He's not discussed that in Canada because he can't, because he
00:08:06killed the deal. It wasn't the United States. He killed the deal because he wants to hitch his
00:08:10wagon with China and the EU. Notably, the same opportunity has not been provided to Canadian
00:08:16media. Trade talks of the U.S. broke down August 21st. Since then, we've been given conflicting
00:08:21information from U.S. representatives about the reason for the breakdown and not one sit-down
00:08:26interview from our PM because he can't do it. Because he's got to keep his supporters wild
00:08:32up thinking it's all the United States fault. And this is the thing that Tanike, Reed, Monk just
00:08:37don't get. And Vashti Capellas never calls them out on this. Let's continue with this interview.
00:08:44And I don't know if you should give him that much credit, but I can't think of another rational
00:08:48explanation as to why you would speculate on this. Because he's got to rile up his supporters
00:08:54and he's trying to influence the United States election, which is less than two months away.
00:08:58well six weeks away at this point less than six weeks away that's what he's trying to do
00:09:04that's why he's in the united states well i think he said it because it's true like i
00:09:09said it because that's actually what's going on uh you know it's it's not a a unfortunately sadly
00:09:18unbelievably not a completely uh out of the realm possibility i agree it's like a very low
00:09:25percentage risk but it's not a zero and and it would have been a zero for you know most of the
00:09:31last century but it's but it's not now and why not because the guy who gets to make the decision
00:09:36donald trump uh has been making threats uh uh about us about greenland about other places
00:09:43uh while cozying up to uh to putin and uh the chinese dictators and uh north korean dictators
00:09:50It's, you know, no mention that Carney's cozying up to Chinese dictators and just think of it from.
00:10:00Think of this through the lens of somebody who's in their 60s who think Canada is what it was 30 years ago.
00:10:07It's not the same. You know that. I know that. But think about it from their standpoint.
00:10:11Oh, that awful Trump. Now Carney can do anything he wants.
00:10:14We've talked about this. He can do anything he wants to you now to push the agenda that other prime ministers,
00:10:20have been told they can't do like scott reed said it's really uh i think it speaks to the craziness
00:10:26of the times i i doubt it's intentional but i agree with scott's point that it's maybe accidentally
00:10:31brilliant to bring that up it's the same time you're bringing up this legislation because it
00:10:35does at least he gets that he brings it up so that he can pass this legislation out the you know
00:10:44depth and breadth of the stakes here kathleen yeah putting aside carney's love affair with
00:10:49international media uh so there you go she mentions the fact that carney's not talking
00:10:54to canadian media nothing because he can't he'd let the cat out of the bag he'd have to
00:11:01kind of avoiding domestic media i i think that you know don't put too much you know genius
00:11:07comm strategy on this on on answering the question right the the 10 journalists in the room asked
00:11:11the question he responded he actually has kind of a propensity to answer quite a forthright in some
00:11:17in some times. And so I think that's what happened. But I think there were two audiences
00:11:20here that he was both, both the Canadian audience, as my colleagues have suggested, but also
00:11:25the American audience. Yeah. So he's got the Canadian audience that still watch his crap like
00:11:30this. Then he's got the American audience that he's trying to rile up because he wants to0.99
00:11:35influence the U.S. election. That's where, I mean, we get concerned about influence from other
00:11:40countries in Canadian elections. Now, Canada is interfering in the United States election.
00:11:44They're also doing the same same thing in Israel. And while we've been living this nightmare for 18 months under Trump with all the threats, 51st state, you know, economic.
00:11:52I've been living a nightmare for the last 18 months under Mark Carney and the liberal government.
00:11:57Oh, hell, it goes back 11 years under the liberal government, the previous government run by Justin Trudeau.
00:12:02They don't get that media reported in the same way that we live this nightmare every day.
00:12:07And I think it was important for Carney to talk to the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg and all the other agencies he's been speaking to lately to get that message out because he's telling Americans just how bad it's been from a Canadian perspective.
00:12:22And that's important from a public opinion point of view, a persuasion point of view, and the fact that we're heading into the midterms.
00:12:29And he really wants that audience to know why Canada is making the dramatic moves to diversify that it is.
00:12:35say it say it he wants the american public to know because he wants to influence their vote
00:12:43arming up and and possibly buying planes from european countries and you know and i actually
00:12:50don't even think you know it was the only interesting thing in that article article that
00:12:53was posted i mean the stuff that he said about you know we're not only changing geopolitical
00:12:57relations we're actually changed want to change you know global financial relations and his
00:13:03reference to the dollar that actually is quite significant and for a business audience could have
00:13:08big impact too okay so let's move away from this so you know you know what's interesting about this
00:13:15is the americans don't give a damn what goes on in canada and i have a friend who was just it was
00:13:19jason levine he was down there with his family they went on a vacation they went to mount rushmore
00:13:23in different places and he talked to people and that's jason's way you're paying attention to
00:13:29what's going on in canada right now i've heard rumblings but don't think about it very much
00:14:02In what universe would the United States invade Canada?
00:14:05Contingency plans are supposed to be about what-if scenarios, such as what if the leader of Canada went absolutely bonkers and imagined the U.S. would invade his country?
00:14:14Perhaps the U.S. would be forced into a preemptive strike before Carney could warm up the sled dogs and attack Minnesota or something.
00:14:23Canada mentioned being prepared for a U.S. or sorry, Carney mentioned being prepared for a U.S. invasion to a news outlet equally bonkers with TDS, Trump derangement syndrome, as he was.
00:14:36The New York Times. I think you have a responsibility in these roles to look at extreme tail risk.
00:14:41That's just risk management. That's not a base case, Carney told the Times, arguing that it would be irresponsible not to.
00:14:49Some idiot news person asked the head of U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, Admiral Samuel Paparo, a hypothetical question about an American invasion of Canada.0.97
00:15:00I find that scenario to be absolutely and utterly preposterous.0.99
00:15:08And so I follow the orders of the commander-in-chief, but that is a needlessly emotional question.
00:15:19I don't find, forgive my saying it too, is that Canada is a close ally.
00:15:30I'm sorry. I didn't mean to be insulted, but you didn't answer the question. I'm sorry. You didn't answer the question. I said I follow the orders of the president and I find it to be a. Would you ask me, please, also what my attack plans are for the Martians?
00:15:50I might add, I think it was a CTV reporter that works with Vachy Capellas who asked that stupid1.00
00:15:56question. How did the media cover this? We'll get back to this article in just a moment.1.00
00:16:00U.S. Admiral dodges questions about attacking Canada. Excuse me? He said it was utterly
00:16:06preposterous. Here's a story from just a couple of days ago. Zero chance U.S. attacks Canada.
00:16:12Alaska governor tells conference, of course, it's zero. Back to the article. Papero shouldn't be
00:16:19so harsh with the Canadians. They have moved beyond the snowflake stage of wokeness and entered1.00
00:16:25marshmallow brain territory back to the idiot people on CTV you were just watching. Corey1.00
00:16:31Tanike, Scott Reid, and Kathleen Monk, along with Vashie Capellas. Carney's angst originated with
00:16:37President Donald Trump's epic troll of our northern neighbors, referring to them as our
00:16:4151st state. There is no greater insult that can be given to a Canadian who has books of jokes
00:16:47about Canada really being America due to its geographic proximity, cultural similarities,
00:16:53or polite nature. Now, here's the Robin Williams quote, which is just genius. Robin Williams
00:16:59summed it up when he said, Canada is like a loft apartment over a really great party.
00:17:07Why did we never invade Canada before? Because every time American military planners looked at
00:17:13a map, they realized they'd have to administer Quebec and everyone decided it just wasn't worth
00:17:19the trouble, ladies and gentlemen. If you ever wonder why people are so misinformed and so
00:17:26clueless when it comes to the relations between Canada and the United States of America,
00:17:33it's because of things like CTV and CBC. You know what really needs to be done right now