Leo D.M.J. Aurini - August 21, 2015


R-Type Conspiracy Theories


Episode Stats

Length

17 minutes

Words per Minute

139.70746

Word Count

2,391

Sentence Count

2

Misogynist Sentences

3

Hate Speech Sentences

34


Summary

In this episode of the podcast, I discuss the recent drama involving a chemist who accused me of anti-Semitism and conspiracy theories surrounding the Holocaust. I discuss how the Holocaust came to be and why there was no plan for it.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Music
00:00:12.000 Music
00:00:16.000 Music
00:00:20.000 Music
00:00:24.000 Music
00:00:28.000 Music
00:00:30.000 There's an old saying that goes
00:00:32.000 Great minds talk about ideas
00:00:34.000 Mediocre minds talk about events
00:00:36.000 And lesser minds talk about people
00:00:38.000 I bring that up to assure you folks
00:00:42.000 That this is not going to be a video about drama
00:00:46.000 It's going to start with drama
00:00:48.000 But ultimately this is about ideas
00:00:50.000 In particular, it's something I've noticed
00:00:54.000 With the
00:00:56.000 Those that have weak or damaged
00:00:58.000 Amygdalas
00:01:00.000 It's that they
00:01:02.000 They tend to take completely
00:01:04.000 Innocuous statements
00:01:06.000 And form conspiracy theories around them
00:01:08.000 It's something I've seen several times
00:01:10.000 But this recent drama is such a perfect
00:01:12.000 Public example of that
00:01:14.000 That it really serves to
00:01:16.000 Introduce the whole topic
00:01:18.000 So if you've been following my Twitter
00:01:20.000 Over the past week
00:01:22.000 It's a
00:01:24.000 Doofy looking chemist
00:01:25.000 Who's been
00:01:26.000 You know
00:01:27.000 Accusing me of anti-semitism
00:01:28.000 Taking
00:01:29.000 Quotes
00:01:30.000 Quote mining me
00:01:31.000 Taking them out of context
00:01:32.000 And
00:01:33.000 Just
00:01:34.000 Generally making an ass of himself
00:01:35.000 Yeah
00:01:36.000 It's this guy right here
00:01:37.000 I mean
00:01:38.000 White guy with dreadlocks
00:01:40.000 You know
00:01:41.000 Welcome to the decline folks
00:01:42.000 Now
00:01:45.000 What
00:01:46.000 Where's this accusation come from
00:01:48.000 That I'm a
00:01:49.000 Holocaust denier
00:01:50.000 Well
00:01:51.000 It comes from actually talking about
00:01:53.000 Real historical theory
00:01:55.000 About World War 2
00:01:56.000 You see
00:01:57.000 There is a
00:01:58.000 A very real debate
00:01:59.000 Going on right now
00:02:00.000 Amongst World War 2 historians
00:02:02.000 About how
00:02:03.000 The Holocaust
00:02:04.000 Came to occur
00:02:05.000 What led up to it
00:02:07.000 What caused it
00:02:08.000 And
00:02:09.000 There's
00:02:10.000 Two basic schools of thought
00:02:11.000 And
00:02:12.000 By the way
00:02:13.000 Hat tip out to
00:02:14.000 Derroth
00:02:16.000 Kumpflinger
00:02:17.000 Flieger
00:02:18.000 For linking the article
00:02:19.000 On this
00:02:20.000 And
00:02:21.000 Link down below to it
00:02:22.000 The two schools of thought
00:02:23.000 Are
00:02:24.000 Functionalism
00:02:25.000 And
00:02:26.000 Intentionalism
00:02:27.000 See the
00:02:28.000 Intentionalist argument
00:02:30.000 This one goes
00:02:31.000 Like the extreme form of it
00:02:33.000 Argues that
00:02:34.000 Hitler was planning
00:02:35.000 The Holocaust
00:02:36.000 As early as 1919
00:02:38.000 Now there's no documents
00:02:40.000 Demonstrating this of course
00:02:42.000 There aren't even any documents
00:02:44.000 Demonstrating that he knew
00:02:45.000 It was happening
00:02:46.000 Period
00:02:47.000 Although he almost certainly did
00:02:49.000 And even if he wasn't aware
00:02:50.000 He set up the government
00:02:51.000 And the conditions that allowed it
00:02:53.000 So he's absolutely morally culpable
00:02:54.000 For it
00:02:55.000 The other school of thought
00:02:58.000 The functionalists
00:02:59.000 Are
00:03:00.000 The ones that argue
00:03:01.000 It was
00:03:02.000 It was
00:03:03.000 It was the whole
00:03:04.000 Set up
00:03:05.000 It was the
00:03:06.000 The nature of
00:03:07.000 The national socialist government
00:03:09.000 It was the
00:03:10.000 The starvation
00:03:11.000 Due to the war
00:03:12.000 And it's
00:03:13.000 It was a ground up thing
00:03:15.000 As opposed to a
00:03:16.000 Top down thing
00:03:19.000 Now those are the
00:03:20.000 The two extreme positions
00:03:21.000 On it
00:03:22.000 And
00:03:23.000 And there's
00:03:24.000 There's lesser versions of it
00:03:25.000 That you know
00:03:26.000 They were planning it in their thirties
00:03:27.000 You know
00:03:28.000 Versus
00:03:29.000 You know it kind of occurred
00:03:30.000 Naturally
00:03:31.000 Like all these forces were in play
00:03:33.000 You know at first
00:03:34.000 It started off with trying to expel the Jews
00:03:36.000 Then it started
00:03:37.000 Then it went to you know
00:03:38.000 Taxing them
00:03:39.000 Attacking their businesses
00:03:41.000 Putting them in labour camps
00:03:42.000 And
00:03:43.000 Then
00:03:44.000 Turned into the Holocaust
00:03:46.000 And
00:03:47.000 The synthesis
00:03:48.000 Argues that it's
00:03:49.000 You know all the conditions were there
00:03:51.000 By accident
00:03:52.000 And
00:03:53.000 Then the leadership
00:03:54.000 Decided
00:03:55.000 To
00:03:56.000 Genocide the Jews
00:03:57.000 And
00:03:58.000 And that's probably
00:03:59.000 The closest to my position
00:04:00.000 One of my favourite professors
00:04:03.000 In university was
00:04:04.000 John C. Weaver
00:04:06.000 And
00:04:07.000 And he's very much
00:04:08.000 A structuralist
00:04:09.000 In most
00:04:10.000 Of his
00:04:11.000 His historical
00:04:12.000 Theories
00:04:13.000 He particularly focuses
00:04:14.000 Upon the relevancy
00:04:15.000 Of
00:04:16.000 How property law
00:04:17.000 Leads to
00:04:18.000 Different behaviours
00:04:19.000 In society
00:04:20.000 So
00:04:21.000 Yeah
00:04:22.000 I'm very much
00:04:23.000 Within the functionalist
00:04:24.000 School of things
00:04:25.000 Like obviously
00:04:26.000 There
00:04:27.000 You know
00:04:28.000 Obviously there
00:04:29.000 Were people at the top
00:04:30.000 Organising it
00:04:31.000 Planning it
00:04:32.000 But
00:04:33.000 The best evidence
00:04:34.000 Seems to suggest
00:04:35.000 That the idea
00:04:37.000 Of the final solution
00:04:38.000 The idea of
00:04:39.000 Murdering
00:04:40.000 All of the Jews
00:04:41.000 Didn't really come about
00:04:43.000 Until 1941
00:04:44.000 Hitler was planning
00:04:46.000 And
00:04:47.000 There have been published letters
00:04:48.000 He was planning to expel all the Jews
00:04:50.000 From Germany as early as 1919
00:04:51.000 But
00:04:52.000 The idea of
00:04:53.000 Gassing them all to death
00:04:54.000 Was
00:04:55.000 1941
00:04:56.000 1942
00:04:57.000 Is
00:04:58.000 When that plan
00:04:59.000 Was really put together
00:05:00.000 And
00:05:01.000 Put into effect
00:05:02.000 And
00:05:03.000 So
00:05:04.000 I was discussing this
00:05:05.000 In a video
00:05:06.000 Because
00:05:07.000 There's this
00:05:08.000 Concept nowadays
00:05:09.000 Of the Nazis
00:05:10.000 As super villains
00:05:11.000 Most people out there
00:05:12.000 They get their
00:05:13.000 Image of the Nazis
00:05:15.000 From
00:05:16.000 Castle Wolfenstein
00:05:18.000 Or from the
00:05:19.000 Captain America movie
00:05:20.000 The idea of
00:05:21.000 These
00:05:22.000 Guys
00:05:23.000 In Hugo Boss
00:05:24.000 Uniforms
00:05:25.000 They're just completely evil
00:05:26.000 And want to take over
00:05:27.000 The entire world
00:05:28.000 And that's not an
00:05:29.000 Accurate historical
00:05:30.000 Explanation
00:05:31.000 Of who the Nazis
00:05:32.000 Actually were
00:05:33.000 It
00:05:34.000 Has no subtlety
00:05:35.000 For how
00:05:36.000 They came into power
00:05:37.000 And
00:05:38.000 It really
00:05:39.000 Deprives us
00:05:40.000 Of
00:05:41.000 Being able to
00:05:42.000 Try and understand
00:05:43.000 How genocides
00:05:44.000 Happen
00:05:45.000 And
00:05:46.000 And I think that's
00:05:47.000 An important question
00:05:48.000 To be asking
00:05:49.000 And
00:05:50.000 So in this particular video
00:05:51.000 I said there was
00:05:52.000 No plan for the Holocaust
00:05:53.000 You know
00:05:54.000 And you know
00:05:55.000 Some historians
00:05:56.000 Would disagree with me
00:05:57.000 Others would agree with me
00:05:58.000 That prior to
00:05:59.000 41
00:06:00.000 42
00:06:01.000 There was no plan
00:06:02.000 And that
00:06:03.000 Like once there was a plan
00:06:04.000 They implemented it
00:06:05.000 Obviously it didn't happen
00:06:06.000 Completely by accident
00:06:07.000 It takes a little bit of planning
00:06:08.000 To ship the gas
00:06:09.000 To
00:06:10.000 To the labor camps
00:06:12.000 But you know
00:06:13.000 In context
00:06:14.000 It was pretty obvious
00:06:15.000 What I was saying
00:06:16.000 And given that I'm talking about
00:06:17.000 How the Holocaust
00:06:18.000 Happened
00:06:19.000 Happened
00:06:20.000 I'm
00:06:21.000 Obviously not
00:06:22.000 A Holocaust denier
00:06:24.000 Although I will say
00:06:25.000 In the interest of free speech
00:06:28.000 It's absolutely sickening
00:06:29.000 That Holocaust denial
00:06:30.000 Is a crime in many countries
00:06:32.000 I mean creationists are a great example
00:06:35.000 To explain the principles of evolution
00:06:37.000 To a wider audience
00:06:39.000 And
00:06:40.000 You know
00:06:41.000 The Holocaust denial
00:06:42.000 Having a debate
00:06:44.000 With one of them
00:06:45.000 Is a great example
00:06:46.000 Or a great opportunity
00:06:47.000 For historians
00:06:48.000 To go over all the evidence
00:06:50.000 The truth doesn't need
00:06:53.000 To hide behind censorship
00:06:55.000 Quite frankly
00:06:56.000 No girl
00:06:58.000 Get back over here
00:06:59.000 You're going to knock the tripod over
00:07:04.000 Now
00:07:05.000 The
00:07:06.000 The
00:07:07.000 Dum Dum
00:07:08.000 Was out trolling through my videos
00:07:10.000 Looking
00:07:11.000 For a quote
00:07:12.000 That he could use
00:07:13.000 To
00:07:14.000 Attack me
00:07:15.000 And
00:07:16.000 He came across this one
00:07:17.000 He posted
00:07:18.000 Out of context
00:07:19.000 And accused me of being
00:07:20.000 A Holocaust denier
00:07:21.000 Now
00:07:22.000 The funny thing is
00:07:24.000 Yeah
00:07:25.000 Like I'm obviously
00:07:26.000 Not a Holocaust denier
00:07:28.000 And
00:07:29.000 He's really making an ass of himself
00:07:30.000 By claiming that I am
00:07:31.000 But
00:07:32.000 No matter how many times
00:07:34.000 He's presented with evidence
00:07:35.000 That my opinion on the Holocaust
00:07:37.000 My
00:07:38.000 Well and first of all
00:07:39.000 It's an opinion based upon fact
00:07:40.000 If you have better facts
00:07:41.000 Give them to me
00:07:42.000 I'll change my opinion
00:07:43.000 But
00:07:44.000 It's a mainstream opinion
00:07:45.000 You know
00:07:46.000 I agree
00:07:47.000 There are plenty
00:07:48.000 Of professional historians
00:07:49.000 Teaching classes
00:07:50.000 That agree with me
00:07:51.000 And
00:07:52.000 My opinion
00:07:53.000 Is taught in colleges
00:07:54.000 And universities
00:07:55.000 And
00:07:57.000 Yet he is absolutely convinced
00:07:58.000 Even though I have said that
00:08:00.000 Yeah
00:08:01.000 The Holocaust happened
00:08:02.000 That I'm a Holocaust denier
00:08:05.000 So what's going on here
00:08:07.000 And this is not the first time
00:08:08.000 I've had this happen
00:08:09.000 It's
00:08:10.000 Like
00:08:11.000 You write an article
00:08:12.000 And they take your thesis statement
00:08:14.000 As if it was a slip of the tongue
00:08:16.000 As if it was a Freudian slip
00:08:17.000 That gave away
00:08:18.000 Your secret motives
00:08:20.000 When it's your bloody thesis statement
00:08:22.000 It's like
00:08:23.000 No I'm not being secretive
00:08:25.000 That's it right there
00:08:26.000 That's what
00:08:27.000 What I literally said
00:08:28.000 It's what I literally mean
00:08:29.000 And yet they
00:08:30.000 They take your literal statement
00:08:32.000 And they start
00:08:33.000 Oh God
00:08:34.000 He said that
00:08:35.000 He didn't realize he said that
00:08:36.000 But he said that
00:08:37.000 He must be
00:08:38.000 Whatever
00:08:39.000 And it's something I've been puzzling about
00:08:44.000 For a while now
00:08:46.000 But I think I might have figured out
00:08:48.000 Why
00:08:49.000 It happens
00:08:52.000 Now
00:08:53.000 Here's the thing
00:08:55.000 When
00:08:56.000 Any of us
00:08:57.000 If
00:08:58.000 Any of us
00:08:59.000 Listen to opinions
00:09:00.000 That we disagree with
00:09:01.000 It tends to irritate us
00:09:02.000 You know
00:09:03.000 Like this is why
00:09:04.000 I don't read Jezebel
00:09:05.000 Because it's
00:09:06.000 Really stupid
00:09:07.000 You know
00:09:08.000 There's a lot of nonsense
00:09:09.000 In there
00:09:10.000 And I just don't have the time
00:09:11.000 For that
00:09:12.000 Because I try and stick to things I like reading
00:09:15.000 However
00:09:16.000 If I am going to analyze a feminist
00:09:21.000 You know
00:09:22.000 I will watch her video
00:09:23.000 I will read her writing
00:09:25.000 And the whole time
00:09:26.000 I turn all the emotional affect off
00:09:29.000 You know
00:09:30.000 That's just a natural part of being human
00:09:31.000 Is that we
00:09:32.000 We like hearing people agree with us
00:09:34.000 We don't like hearing people disagree with us
00:09:37.000 But if you're actually honest
00:09:41.000 If you have intellectual integrity
00:09:43.000 If you're a true scholar
00:09:44.000 When you find something you disagree with
00:09:46.000 You
00:09:47.000 You turn off the emotions
00:09:48.000 And you approach it with a scalpel
00:09:50.000 And you look very carefully at what is being said
00:09:53.000 What the intention is
00:09:54.000 And you
00:09:55.000 You don't need to misconstrue things
00:09:57.000 If they're
00:09:58.000 If they're wrong
00:09:59.000 You know
00:10:00.000 You can just
00:10:01.000 Prove that they're wrong
00:10:02.000 Or
00:10:03.000 Perhaps they're right
00:10:04.000 And it's up to you to change your opinion
00:10:05.000 That's for us regular people though
00:10:09.000 You know
00:10:10.000 We don't really like it
00:10:11.000 But
00:10:12.000 Doesn't put us into a panic attack
00:10:14.000 Now
00:10:15.000 With those that have suffered amygdala damage
00:10:19.000 What happens when they run into somebody
00:10:21.000 That they disagree with
00:10:25.000 Is they get triggered
00:10:27.000 They are just overwhelmed with emotions of antipathy
00:10:31.000 You know
00:10:32.000 They just get
00:10:33.000 Just get furious
00:10:34.000 They get into a panic attack
00:10:36.000 And for some reason
00:10:38.000 The Holocaust in particular
00:10:41.000 Seems to be
00:10:42.000 Almost like an article of faith
00:10:44.000 For the modern liberal atheist cult
00:10:48.000 You know
00:10:49.000 Not
00:10:50.000 Not the Holodomor
00:10:51.000 Not
00:10:52.000 Not what the young Turks did to the Armenians
00:10:55.000 Not the UN's failure
00:10:57.000 With the
00:10:58.000 The Rwandan
00:10:59.000 Starvation
00:11:00.000 And genocide
00:11:01.000 You know
00:11:02.000 Those don't trigger them
00:11:03.000 But the Holocaust
00:11:04.000 As soon as anybody
00:11:06.000 That they disagree with
00:11:07.000 On a fundamental level
00:11:08.000 Whether it's because they're
00:11:10.000 Confident
00:11:12.000 You know
00:11:13.000 Or even arrogant
00:11:14.000 You know
00:11:15.000 Donald Trump
00:11:16.000 Trump 2016
00:11:18.000 Whether it's
00:11:19.000 It's that
00:11:20.000 Or they're good looking
00:11:21.000 Or they're a winner
00:11:22.000 Or whatever
00:11:23.000 If they are upset by this person
00:11:24.000 And this person mentions
00:11:26.000 The Holocaust
00:11:27.000 In any manner whatsoever
00:11:28.000 Alarm bells start going off
00:11:30.000 In their head
00:11:31.000 They can't remove
00:11:32.000 The emotional affect
00:11:33.000 Because it's triggering them
00:11:35.000 So incredibly hard
00:11:37.000 And so they
00:11:38.000 They can't think straight
00:11:40.000 They can't listen
00:11:41.000 To what is actually being said there
00:11:43.000 Like facts and logic
00:11:44.000 Go out the window for them
00:11:45.000 Because they are
00:11:46.000 Way too emotional
00:11:47.000 Way too wound up
00:11:48.000 And so if they find
00:11:49.000 One statement
00:11:50.000 You know
00:11:51.000 If they can find one sentence
00:11:53.000 So they don't have to listen
00:11:54.000 To the whole thing
00:11:55.000 They don't have to read
00:11:56.000 The whole argument
00:11:57.000 They can just find that
00:11:58.000 One sentence
00:11:59.000 That's all they can think about
00:12:02.000 You know
00:12:03.000 They are too emotionally excited
00:12:04.000 They're having too much
00:12:05.000 Of a panic attack
00:12:06.000 To actually understand
00:12:07.000 The whole argument
00:12:08.000 They can only focus on that
00:12:09.000 One little bit
00:12:10.000 And they will use that
00:12:12.000 To prove that
00:12:13.000 The speaker is evil
00:12:15.000 That they
00:12:16.000 They are bad
00:12:17.000 They are politically incorrect
00:12:18.000 And
00:12:19.000 And because the holocaust
00:12:21.000 Is such a
00:12:22.000 Like an article of faith
00:12:23.000 For them
00:12:24.000 Holocaust denial
00:12:25.000 Is
00:12:26.000 Is evil
00:12:27.000 As opposed to just ignorant
00:12:29.000 Now
00:12:34.000 This also explains
00:12:35.000 By the way
00:12:36.000 I mean
00:12:37.000 Thunderfoot's this guy
00:12:39.000 That sells himself
00:12:40.000 On being a scientist
00:12:41.000 On being rational
00:12:42.000 So being completely irrational
00:12:45.000 Is really putting a lot of egg
00:12:47.000 On his face
00:12:48.000 And I mean
00:12:49.000 The guy's got like
00:12:50.000 Ten times
00:12:51.000 My subscribership
00:12:52.000 I probably have
00:12:54.000 A much higher total IQ
00:12:56.000 Amongst my subscribers
00:12:57.000 But he's got the larger
00:12:58.000 Subscribership
00:12:59.000 So I'm a
00:13:00.000 I'm a small fry
00:13:01.000 Going after me
00:13:02.000 You know
00:13:03.000 Is not
00:13:04.000 Really helping him
00:13:05.000 In fact
00:13:06.000 It's completely undermining
00:13:07.000 His credibility
00:13:08.000 But he is having
00:13:10.000 Such an emotional reaction
00:13:11.000 That he
00:13:12.000 Again
00:13:13.000 He cannot think straight
00:13:14.000 He cannot understand
00:13:15.000 The entire argument
00:13:16.000 I was presenting
00:13:17.000 Because
00:13:18.000 Because he's overreacting
00:13:19.000 He also can't think straight
00:13:20.000 Tactically
00:13:21.000 Or strategically
00:13:22.000 And that
00:13:23.000 Like if you win this battle
00:13:24.000 It's not going to do anything
00:13:25.000 Good
00:13:26.000 Good for you
00:13:27.000 And if you lose this battle
00:13:28.000 It's going to
00:13:29.000 Really really hurt you
00:13:31.000 And yet he still
00:13:32.000 Makes it
00:13:34.000 Well
00:13:35.000 This
00:13:36.000 This actually goes to
00:13:37.000 The lack of self-control
00:13:39.000 You find amongst
00:13:40.000 Leftists
00:13:41.000 So here's the thing
00:13:44.000 Take
00:13:45.000 Take his profession
00:13:46.000 What he does
00:13:47.000 Science
00:13:48.000 He does a little bit
00:13:49.000 Like chemistry
00:13:50.000 Some
00:13:51.000 Nuclear engineering
00:13:52.000 As well
00:13:53.000 I think
00:13:54.000 These are all numbers
00:13:56.000 These are all facts
00:13:58.000 You don't get
00:13:59.000 Emotionally engaged
00:14:02.000 When you're simply
00:14:03.000 Talking about
00:14:04.000 Facts and science
00:14:05.000 You know
00:14:06.000 There's no
00:14:07.000 Investment of the self
00:14:09.000 In any of that
00:14:11.000 And so he
00:14:12.000 Doing science
00:14:13.000 Being a
00:14:14.000 Moderately talented
00:14:15.000 At it
00:14:16.000 He never had to learn
00:14:17.000 Any self-control
00:14:18.000 And in
00:14:19.000 Interpersonal
00:14:20.000 Relationships
00:14:21.000 He lacked self-control
00:14:23.000 As well
00:14:24.000 Which is why
00:14:25.000 He's attacking me
00:14:26.000 So hard
00:14:27.000 Even though it
00:14:28.000 Certainly doesn't
00:14:29.000 Profit him in any manner
00:14:30.000 It's
00:14:32.000 It's
00:14:33.000 It's a topic
00:14:34.000 That he can't
00:14:35.000 Be reasonable about
00:14:36.000 Because his
00:14:37.000 Identity is
00:14:38.000 Wrapped up in it
00:14:39.000 And so you take
00:14:40.000 This innocuous
00:14:41.000 Statement
00:14:42.000 You take the
00:14:43.000 Thesis statement
00:14:44.000 That the
00:14:45.000 You know that the
00:14:46.000 Holocaust was
00:14:47.000 Not really planned
00:14:48.000 Until 41-42
00:14:49.000 And that it was
00:14:51.000 That it was
00:14:52.000 It was more organic
00:14:53.000 Factors
00:14:54.000 That led to it
00:14:55.000 And I believe in
00:14:57.000 The video he quoted
00:14:58.000 I was saying that
00:14:59.000 Listen the internment
00:15:00.000 Of the Japanese
00:15:01.000 Citizens
00:15:02.000 In America
00:15:03.000 And Canada
00:15:04.000 If America
00:15:05.000 And Canada
00:15:06.000 Had been starving
00:15:07.000 If
00:15:08.000 If the Japanese
00:15:09.000 Were invading
00:15:10.000 Our borders
00:15:11.000 It's quite possible
00:15:12.000 That our societies
00:15:13.000 Might have wound up
00:15:14.000 Performing a holocaust
00:15:16.000 Against the Japanese
00:15:22.000 None of that will register
00:15:23.000 With him
00:15:24.000 Because it's
00:15:25.000 An emotional investment
00:15:27.000 So
00:15:28.000 Folks
00:15:29.000 When you're
00:15:30.000 When you're out there
00:15:31.000 When you're
00:15:32.000 Sending out feelers
00:15:33.000 Looking out for people
00:15:34.000 With amygdala damage
00:15:35.000 Or leftists
00:15:36.000 Or narcissists
00:15:37.000 Or people like that
00:15:38.000 This is one of the things
00:15:39.000 You look for
00:15:40.000 If they latch onto
00:15:41.000 A single phrase
00:15:42.000 Somebody said
00:15:43.000 And take
00:15:44.660 And obsess over it
00:15:46.000 And then conspire
00:15:48.000 About it
00:15:48.800 You know
00:15:49.400 Like this
00:15:49.800 This phrase means
00:15:50.700 He's a holocaust denier
00:15:51.900 Or that she's racist
00:15:53.500 Or that she
00:15:54.640 He
00:15:55.360 She
00:15:55.760 Whatever
00:15:57.160 If
00:15:57.980 If they're making
00:15:58.460 Unwarranted conclusions
00:15:59.780 Based upon
00:16:00.700 A
00:16:01.240 A single statement
00:16:03.040 That's a sign
00:16:04.980 That you're dealing
00:16:05.520 With somebody
00:16:06.020 That's not
00:16:06.540 Fundamentally rational
00:16:07.760 Who lacks a lot
00:16:08.940 Of self-control
00:16:09.760 And who is prone
00:16:11.280 To panics
00:16:12.640 And if you get
00:16:14.020 Too close to them
00:16:14.820 They are very prone
00:16:16.280 To treachery
00:16:17.340 So
00:16:18.420 Look out for those people
00:16:20.720 And
00:16:21.880 Barini out
00:16:23.560 I want to take
00:16:26.800 I want to take
00:16:27.560 Over and
00:16:29.800 You
00:16:32.380 I
00:16:32.680 I
00:16:33.340 I
00:16:33.800 S
00:16:34.400 Nothing
00:16:36.000 I
00:16:36.880 Thank you.