Leo D.M.J. Aurini - R-Type Conspiracy Theories

00:00:00.000 Music

00:00:12.000 Music

00:00:16.000 Music

00:00:20.000 Music

00:00:24.000 Music

00:00:28.000 Music

00:00:30.000 There's an old saying that goes

00:00:32.000 Great minds talk about ideas

00:00:34.000 Mediocre minds talk about events

00:00:36.000 And lesser minds talk about people

00:00:38.000 I bring that up to assure you folks

00:00:42.000 That this is not going to be a video about drama

00:00:46.000 It's going to start with drama

00:00:48.000 But ultimately this is about ideas

00:00:50.000 In particular, it's something I've noticed

00:00:54.000 With the

00:00:56.000 Those that have weak or damaged

00:00:58.000 Amygdalas 0.99

00:01:00.000 It's that they

00:01:02.000 They tend to take completely

00:01:04.000 Innocuous statements

00:01:06.000 And form conspiracy theories around them

00:01:08.000 It's something I've seen several times

00:01:10.000 But this recent drama is such a perfect

00:01:12.000 Public example of that

00:01:14.000 That it really serves to

00:01:16.000 Introduce the whole topic

00:01:18.000 So if you've been following my Twitter

00:01:20.000 Over the past week

00:01:22.000 It's a

00:01:24.000 Doofy looking chemist

00:01:25.000 Who's been

00:01:26.000 You know

00:01:27.000 Accusing me of anti-semitism

00:01:28.000 Taking

00:01:29.000 Quotes

00:01:30.000 Quote mining me

00:01:31.000 Taking them out of context

00:01:32.000 And

00:01:33.000 Just 0.99

00:01:34.000 Generally making an ass of himself 0.95

00:01:35.000 Yeah 0.99

00:01:36.000 It's this guy right here

00:01:37.000 I mean

00:01:38.000 White guy with dreadlocks

00:01:40.000 You know

00:01:41.000 Welcome to the decline folks

00:01:42.000 Now

00:01:45.000 What

00:01:46.000 Where's this accusation come from

00:01:48.000 That I'm a

00:01:49.000 Holocaust denier

00:01:50.000 Well

00:01:51.000 It comes from actually talking about

00:01:53.000 Real historical theory

00:01:55.000 About World War 2

00:01:56.000 You see

00:01:57.000 There is a

00:01:58.000 A very real debate

00:01:59.000 Going on right now

00:02:00.000 Amongst World War 2 historians

00:02:02.000 About how

00:02:03.000 The Holocaust 0.90

00:02:04.000 Came to occur

00:02:05.000 What led up to it

00:02:07.000 What caused it

00:02:08.000 And

00:02:09.000 There's

00:02:10.000 Two basic schools of thought

00:02:11.000 And

00:02:12.000 By the way

00:02:13.000 Hat tip out to

00:02:14.000 Derroth

00:02:16.000 Kumpflinger

00:02:17.000 Flieger

00:02:18.000 For linking the article

00:02:19.000 On this

00:02:20.000 And

00:02:21.000 Link down below to it

00:02:22.000 The two schools of thought

00:02:23.000 Are

00:02:24.000 Functionalism

00:02:25.000 And

00:02:26.000 Intentionalism

00:02:27.000 See the

00:02:28.000 Intentionalist argument

00:02:30.000 This one goes

00:02:31.000 Like the extreme form of it

00:02:33.000 Argues that

00:02:34.000 Hitler was planning 1.00

00:02:35.000 The Holocaust 0.90

00:02:36.000 As early as 1919

00:02:38.000 Now there's no documents

00:02:40.000 Demonstrating this of course

00:02:42.000 There aren't even any documents

00:02:44.000 Demonstrating that he knew

00:02:45.000 It was happening

00:02:46.000 Period

00:02:47.000 Although he almost certainly did

00:02:49.000 And even if he wasn't aware

00:02:50.000 He set up the government

00:02:51.000 And the conditions that allowed it

00:02:53.000 So he's absolutely morally culpable

00:02:54.000 For it

00:02:55.000 The other school of thought

00:02:58.000 The functionalists

00:02:59.000 Are

00:03:00.000 The ones that argue

00:03:01.000 It was

00:03:02.000 It was

00:03:03.000 It was the whole

00:03:04.000 Set up

00:03:05.000 It was the

00:03:06.000 The nature of

00:03:07.000 The national socialist government

00:03:09.000 It was the

00:03:10.000 The starvation

00:03:11.000 Due to the war

00:03:12.000 And it's

00:03:13.000 It was a ground up thing

00:03:15.000 As opposed to a

00:03:16.000 Top down thing

00:03:19.000 Now those are the

00:03:20.000 The two extreme positions

00:03:21.000 On it

00:03:22.000 And

00:03:23.000 And there's

00:03:24.000 There's lesser versions of it

00:03:25.000 That you know

00:03:26.000 They were planning it in their thirties

00:03:27.000 You know

00:03:28.000 Versus

00:03:29.000 You know it kind of occurred

00:03:30.000 Naturally

00:03:31.000 Like all these forces were in play

00:03:33.000 You know at first

00:03:34.000 It started off with trying to expel the Jews 1.00

00:03:36.000 Then it started

00:03:37.000 Then it went to you know

00:03:38.000 Taxing them

00:03:39.000 Attacking their businesses

00:03:41.000 Putting them in labour camps

00:03:42.000 And

00:03:43.000 Then

00:03:44.000 Turned into the Holocaust 0.92

00:03:46.000 And

00:03:47.000 The synthesis

00:03:48.000 Argues that it's

00:03:49.000 You know all the conditions were there

00:03:51.000 By accident

00:03:52.000 And

00:03:53.000 Then the leadership

00:03:54.000 Decided

00:03:55.000 To 0.99

00:03:56.000 Genocide the Jews 0.99

00:03:57.000 And 0.95

00:03:58.000 And that's probably

00:03:59.000 The closest to my position

00:04:00.000 One of my favourite professors

00:04:03.000 In university was

00:04:04.000 John C. Weaver

00:04:06.000 And

00:04:07.000 And he's very much

00:04:08.000 A structuralist

00:04:09.000 In most

00:04:10.000 Of his

00:04:11.000 His historical

00:04:12.000 Theories

00:04:13.000 He particularly focuses

00:04:14.000 Upon the relevancy

00:04:15.000 Of

00:04:16.000 How property law

00:04:17.000 Leads to

00:04:18.000 Different behaviours

00:04:19.000 In society

00:04:20.000 So

00:04:21.000 Yeah

00:04:22.000 I'm very much

00:04:23.000 Within the functionalist

00:04:24.000 School of things

00:04:25.000 Like obviously

00:04:26.000 There

00:04:27.000 You know

00:04:28.000 Obviously there

00:04:29.000 Were people at the top

00:04:30.000 Organising it

00:04:31.000 Planning it

00:04:32.000 But

00:04:33.000 The best evidence

00:04:34.000 Seems to suggest

00:04:35.000 That the idea

00:04:37.000 Of the final solution

00:04:38.000 The idea of

00:04:39.000 Murdering 1.00

00:04:40.000 All of the Jews 0.97

00:04:41.000 Didn't really come about

00:04:43.000 Until 1941 0.84

00:04:44.000 Hitler was planning 1.00

00:04:46.000 And

00:04:47.000 There have been published letters

00:04:48.000 He was planning to expel all the Jews 1.00

00:04:50.000 From Germany as early as 1919 0.86

00:04:51.000 But

00:04:52.000 The idea of 0.97

00:04:53.000 Gassing them all to death 0.99

00:04:54.000 Was

00:04:55.000 1941

00:04:56.000 1942

00:04:57.000 Is 0.88

00:04:58.000 When that plan

00:04:59.000 Was really put together

00:05:00.000 And

00:05:01.000 Put into effect

00:05:02.000 And

00:05:03.000 So

00:05:04.000 I was discussing this

00:05:05.000 In a video

00:05:06.000 Because

00:05:07.000 There's this

00:05:08.000 Concept nowadays

00:05:09.000 Of the Nazis 0.75

00:05:10.000 As super villains

00:05:11.000 Most people out there

00:05:12.000 They get their

00:05:13.000 Image of the Nazis

00:05:15.000 From

00:05:16.000 Castle Wolfenstein

00:05:18.000 Or from the

00:05:19.000 Captain America movie

00:05:20.000 The idea of

00:05:21.000 These

00:05:22.000 Guys

00:05:23.000 In Hugo Boss

00:05:24.000 Uniforms

00:05:25.000 They're just completely evil

00:05:26.000 And want to take over 0.92

00:05:27.000 The entire world

00:05:28.000 And that's not an

00:05:29.000 Accurate historical

00:05:30.000 Explanation

00:05:31.000 Of who the Nazis

00:05:32.000 Actually were

00:05:33.000 It

00:05:34.000 Has no subtlety

00:05:35.000 For how

00:05:36.000 They came into power

00:05:37.000 And

00:05:38.000 It really

00:05:39.000 Deprives us

00:05:40.000 Of

00:05:41.000 Being able to

00:05:42.000 Try and understand

00:05:43.000 How genocides

00:05:44.000 Happen

00:05:45.000 And

00:05:46.000 And I think that's

00:05:47.000 An important question

00:05:48.000 To be asking

00:05:49.000 And

00:05:50.000 So in this particular video

00:05:51.000 I said there was

00:05:52.000 No plan for the Holocaust 1.00

00:05:53.000 You know

00:05:54.000 And you know

00:05:55.000 Some historians

00:05:56.000 Would disagree with me

00:05:57.000 Others would agree with me

00:05:58.000 That prior to

00:05:59.000 41

00:06:00.000 42

00:06:01.000 There was no plan

00:06:02.000 And that

00:06:03.000 Like once there was a plan

00:06:04.000 They implemented it

00:06:05.000 Obviously it didn't happen

00:06:06.000 Completely by accident

00:06:07.000 It takes a little bit of planning

00:06:08.000 To ship the gas

00:06:09.000 To

00:06:10.000 To the labor camps

00:06:12.000 But you know

00:06:13.000 In context

00:06:14.000 It was pretty obvious

00:06:15.000 What I was saying

00:06:16.000 And given that I'm talking about

00:06:17.000 How the Holocaust 0.57

00:06:18.000 Happened

00:06:19.000 Happened

00:06:20.000 I'm

00:06:21.000 Obviously not

00:06:22.000 A Holocaust denier

00:06:24.000 Although I will say

00:06:25.000 In the interest of free speech

00:06:28.000 It's absolutely sickening

00:06:29.000 That Holocaust denial

00:06:30.000 Is a crime in many countries

00:06:32.000 I mean creationists are a great example

00:06:35.000 To explain the principles of evolution

00:06:37.000 To a wider audience

00:06:39.000 And

00:06:40.000 You know

00:06:41.000 The Holocaust denial

00:06:42.000 Having a debate

00:06:44.000 With one of them

00:06:45.000 Is a great example

00:06:46.000 Or a great opportunity

00:06:47.000 For historians

00:06:48.000 To go over all the evidence

00:06:50.000 The truth doesn't need

00:06:53.000 To hide behind censorship

00:06:55.000 Quite frankly

00:06:56.000 No girl 1.00

00:06:58.000 Get back over here 0.77

00:06:59.000 You're going to knock the tripod over

00:07:04.000 Now

00:07:05.000 The

00:07:06.000 The

00:07:07.000 Dum Dum 0.56

00:07:08.000 Was out trolling through my videos

00:07:10.000 Looking

00:07:11.000 For a quote

00:07:12.000 That he could use

00:07:13.000 To 0.99

00:07:14.000 Attack me 0.98

00:07:15.000 And

00:07:16.000 He came across this one

00:07:17.000 He posted

00:07:18.000 Out of context

00:07:19.000 And accused me of being

00:07:20.000 A Holocaust denier

00:07:21.000 Now

00:07:22.000 The funny thing is

00:07:24.000 Yeah

00:07:25.000 Like I'm obviously

00:07:26.000 Not a Holocaust denier

00:07:28.000 And 0.93

00:07:29.000 He's really making an ass of himself 0.97

00:07:30.000 By claiming that I am 0.95

00:07:31.000 But

00:07:32.000 No matter how many times

00:07:34.000 He's presented with evidence

00:07:35.000 That my opinion on the Holocaust 0.68

00:07:37.000 My

00:07:38.000 Well and first of all

00:07:39.000 It's an opinion based upon fact

00:07:40.000 If you have better facts

00:07:41.000 Give them to me

00:07:42.000 I'll change my opinion

00:07:43.000 But

00:07:44.000 It's a mainstream opinion

00:07:45.000 You know

00:07:46.000 I agree

00:07:47.000 There are plenty

00:07:48.000 Of professional historians

00:07:49.000 Teaching classes

00:07:50.000 That agree with me

00:07:51.000 And

00:07:52.000 My opinion

00:07:53.000 Is taught in colleges

00:07:54.000 And universities

00:07:55.000 And

00:07:57.000 Yet he is absolutely convinced

00:07:58.000 Even though I have said that

00:08:00.000 Yeah

00:08:01.000 The Holocaust happened 0.99

00:08:02.000 That I'm a Holocaust denier 0.96

00:08:05.000 So what's going on here

00:08:07.000 And this is not the first time

00:08:08.000 I've had this happen

00:08:09.000 It's

00:08:10.000 Like

00:08:11.000 You write an article

00:08:12.000 And they take your thesis statement

00:08:14.000 As if it was a slip of the tongue

00:08:16.000 As if it was a Freudian slip

00:08:17.000 That gave away

00:08:18.000 Your secret motives 0.83

00:08:20.000 When it's your bloody thesis statement

00:08:22.000 It's like 0.81

00:08:23.000 No I'm not being secretive

00:08:25.000 That's it right there

00:08:26.000 That's what

00:08:27.000 What I literally said

00:08:28.000 It's what I literally mean

00:08:29.000 And yet they

00:08:30.000 They take your literal statement

00:08:32.000 And they start

00:08:33.000 Oh God

00:08:34.000 He said that

00:08:35.000 He didn't realize he said that

00:08:36.000 But he said that

00:08:37.000 He must be

00:08:38.000 Whatever

00:08:39.000 And it's something I've been puzzling about

00:08:44.000 For a while now

00:08:46.000 But I think I might have figured out

00:08:48.000 Why

00:08:49.000 It happens

00:08:52.000 Now

00:08:53.000 Here's the thing

00:08:55.000 When

00:08:56.000 Any of us

00:08:57.000 If

00:08:58.000 Any of us

00:08:59.000 Listen to opinions

00:09:00.000 That we disagree with

00:09:01.000 It tends to irritate us

00:09:02.000 You know

00:09:03.000 Like this is why

00:09:04.000 I don't read Jezebel

00:09:05.000 Because it's 1.00

00:09:06.000 Really stupid 1.00

00:09:07.000 You know 1.00

00:09:08.000 There's a lot of nonsense 0.76

00:09:09.000 In there

00:09:10.000 And I just don't have the time

00:09:11.000 For that

00:09:12.000 Because I try and stick to things I like reading

00:09:15.000 However

00:09:16.000 If I am going to analyze a feminist 1.00

00:09:21.000 You know

00:09:22.000 I will watch her video

00:09:23.000 I will read her writing

00:09:25.000 And the whole time

00:09:26.000 I turn all the emotional affect off

00:09:29.000 You know

00:09:30.000 That's just a natural part of being human

00:09:31.000 Is that we

00:09:32.000 We like hearing people agree with us

00:09:34.000 We don't like hearing people disagree with us

00:09:37.000 But if you're actually honest

00:09:41.000 If you have intellectual integrity

00:09:43.000 If you're a true scholar

00:09:44.000 When you find something you disagree with

00:09:46.000 You

00:09:47.000 You turn off the emotions

00:09:48.000 And you approach it with a scalpel

00:09:50.000 And you look very carefully at what is being said

00:09:53.000 What the intention is

00:09:54.000 And you

00:09:55.000 You don't need to misconstrue things

00:09:57.000 If they're

00:09:58.000 If they're wrong

00:09:59.000 You know

00:10:00.000 You can just

00:10:01.000 Prove that they're wrong

00:10:02.000 Or

00:10:03.000 Perhaps they're right 0.98

00:10:04.000 And it's up to you to change your opinion

00:10:05.000 That's for us regular people though

00:10:09.000 You know

00:10:10.000 We don't really like it

00:10:11.000 But

00:10:12.000 Doesn't put us into a panic attack

00:10:14.000 Now

00:10:15.000 With those that have suffered amygdala damage

00:10:19.000 What happens when they run into somebody

00:10:21.000 That they disagree with

00:10:25.000 Is they get triggered

00:10:27.000 They are just overwhelmed with emotions of antipathy

00:10:31.000 You know

00:10:32.000 They just get

00:10:33.000 Just get furious

00:10:34.000 They get into a panic attack

00:10:36.000 And for some reason

00:10:38.000 The Holocaust in particular 0.55

00:10:41.000 Seems to be

00:10:42.000 Almost like an article of faith

00:10:44.000 For the modern liberal atheist cult

00:10:48.000 You know

00:10:49.000 Not

00:10:50.000 Not the Holodomor

00:10:51.000 Not

00:10:52.000 Not what the young Turks did to the Armenians

00:10:55.000 Not the UN's failure

00:10:57.000 With the

00:10:58.000 The Rwandan

00:10:59.000 Starvation

00:11:00.000 And genocide

00:11:01.000 You know

00:11:02.000 Those don't trigger them

00:11:03.000 But the Holocaust 0.89

00:11:04.000 As soon as anybody

00:11:06.000 That they disagree with

00:11:07.000 On a fundamental level

00:11:08.000 Whether it's because they're

00:11:10.000 Confident

00:11:12.000 You know

00:11:13.000 Or even arrogant

00:11:14.000 You know

00:11:15.000 Donald Trump

00:11:16.000 Trump 2016

00:11:18.000 Whether it's

00:11:19.000 It's that

00:11:20.000 Or they're good looking

00:11:21.000 Or they're a winner

00:11:22.000 Or whatever

00:11:23.000 If they are upset by this person

00:11:24.000 And this person mentions

00:11:26.000 The Holocaust 0.90

00:11:27.000 In any manner whatsoever

00:11:28.000 Alarm bells start going off

00:11:30.000 In their head

00:11:31.000 They can't remove

00:11:32.000 The emotional affect

00:11:33.000 Because it's triggering them

00:11:35.000 So incredibly hard

00:11:37.000 And so they

00:11:38.000 They can't think straight

00:11:40.000 They can't listen

00:11:41.000 To what is actually being said there

00:11:43.000 Like facts and logic

00:11:44.000 Go out the window for them

00:11:45.000 Because they are

00:11:46.000 Way too emotional

00:11:47.000 Way too wound up

00:11:48.000 And so if they find

00:11:49.000 One statement

00:11:50.000 You know

00:11:51.000 If they can find one sentence

00:11:53.000 So they don't have to listen

00:11:54.000 To the whole thing

00:11:55.000 They don't have to read

00:11:56.000 The whole argument

00:11:57.000 They can just find that

00:11:58.000 One sentence

00:11:59.000 That's all they can think about

00:12:02.000 You know

00:12:03.000 They are too emotionally excited

00:12:04.000 They're having too much

00:12:05.000 Of a panic attack

00:12:06.000 To actually understand

00:12:07.000 The whole argument

00:12:08.000 They can only focus on that

00:12:09.000 One little bit

00:12:10.000 And they will use that

00:12:12.000 To prove that

00:12:13.000 The speaker is evil

00:12:15.000 That they

00:12:16.000 They are bad

00:12:17.000 They are politically incorrect

00:12:18.000 And

00:12:19.000 And because the holocaust 0.96

00:12:21.000 Is such a

00:12:22.000 Like an article of faith

00:12:23.000 For them

00:12:24.000 Holocaust denial

00:12:25.000 Is 0.88

00:12:26.000 Is evil 0.99

00:12:27.000 As opposed to just ignorant 0.99

00:12:29.000 Now 0.94

00:12:34.000 This also explains

00:12:35.000 By the way

00:12:36.000 I mean

00:12:37.000 Thunderfoot's this guy

00:12:39.000 That sells himself

00:12:40.000 On being a scientist

00:12:41.000 On being rational

00:12:42.000 So being completely irrational

00:12:45.000 Is really putting a lot of egg

00:12:47.000 On his face

00:12:48.000 And I mean

00:12:49.000 The guy's got like

00:12:50.000 Ten times

00:12:51.000 My subscribership

00:12:52.000 I probably have

00:12:54.000 A much higher total IQ

00:12:56.000 Amongst my subscribers

00:12:57.000 But he's got the larger

00:12:58.000 Subscribership

00:12:59.000 So I'm a

00:13:00.000 I'm a small fry

00:13:01.000 Going after me

00:13:02.000 You know

00:13:03.000 Is not

00:13:04.000 Really helping him

00:13:05.000 In fact

00:13:06.000 It's completely undermining

00:13:07.000 His credibility

00:13:08.000 But he is having

00:13:10.000 Such an emotional reaction

00:13:11.000 That he

00:13:12.000 Again

00:13:13.000 He cannot think straight

00:13:14.000 He cannot understand

00:13:15.000 The entire argument

00:13:16.000 I was presenting

00:13:17.000 Because

00:13:18.000 Because he's overreacting

00:13:19.000 He also can't think straight

00:13:20.000 Tactically

00:13:21.000 Or strategically

00:13:22.000 And that

00:13:23.000 Like if you win this battle

00:13:24.000 It's not going to do anything

00:13:25.000 Good

00:13:26.000 Good for you

00:13:27.000 And if you lose this battle

00:13:28.000 It's going to

00:13:29.000 Really really hurt you

00:13:31.000 And yet he still

00:13:32.000 Makes it

00:13:34.000 Well

00:13:35.000 This

00:13:36.000 This actually goes to

00:13:37.000 The lack of self-control

00:13:39.000 You find amongst

00:13:40.000 Leftists

00:13:41.000 So here's the thing

00:13:44.000 Take

00:13:45.000 Take his profession

00:13:46.000 What he does

00:13:47.000 Science

00:13:48.000 He does a little bit

00:13:49.000 Like chemistry

00:13:50.000 Some

00:13:51.000 Nuclear engineering

00:13:52.000 As well

00:13:53.000 I think

00:13:54.000 These are all numbers

00:13:56.000 These are all facts

00:13:58.000 You don't get

00:13:59.000 Emotionally engaged

00:14:02.000 When you're simply

00:14:03.000 Talking about

00:14:04.000 Facts and science

00:14:05.000 You know

00:14:06.000 There's no

00:14:07.000 Investment of the self

00:14:09.000 In any of that

00:14:11.000 And so he

00:14:12.000 Doing science

00:14:13.000 Being a

00:14:14.000 Moderately talented

00:14:15.000 At it

00:14:16.000 He never had to learn

00:14:17.000 Any self-control

00:14:18.000 And in

00:14:19.000 Interpersonal

00:14:20.000 Relationships

00:14:21.000 He lacked self-control

00:14:23.000 As well

00:14:24.000 Which is why

00:14:25.000 He's attacking me

00:14:26.000 So hard

00:14:27.000 Even though it

00:14:28.000 Certainly doesn't

00:14:29.000 Profit him in any manner

00:14:30.000 It's

00:14:32.000 It's

00:14:33.000 It's a topic

00:14:34.000 That he can't

00:14:35.000 Be reasonable about

00:14:36.000 Because his

00:14:37.000 Identity is

00:14:38.000 Wrapped up in it

00:14:39.000 And so you take

00:14:40.000 This innocuous

00:14:41.000 Statement

00:14:42.000 You take the

00:14:43.000 Thesis statement

00:14:44.000 That the

00:14:45.000 You know that the

00:14:46.000 Holocaust was 0.99

00:14:47.000 Not really planned

00:14:48.000 Until 41-42

00:14:49.000 And that it was

00:14:51.000 That it was

00:14:52.000 It was more organic

00:14:53.000 Factors

00:14:54.000 That led to it

00:14:55.000 And I believe in

00:14:57.000 The video he quoted

00:14:58.000 I was saying that

00:14:59.000 Listen the internment

00:15:00.000 Of the Japanese 1.00

00:15:01.000 Citizens

00:15:02.000 In America

00:15:03.000 And Canada

00:15:04.000 If America

00:15:05.000 And Canada

00:15:06.000 Had been starving

00:15:07.000 If

00:15:08.000 If the Japanese 1.00

00:15:09.000 Were invading 0.94

00:15:10.000 Our borders

00:15:11.000 It's quite possible

00:15:12.000 That our societies

00:15:13.000 Might have wound up

00:15:14.000 Performing a holocaust 0.99

00:15:16.000 Against the Japanese 1.00

00:15:22.000 None of that will register

00:15:23.000 With him

00:15:24.000 Because it's

00:15:25.000 An emotional investment

00:15:27.000 So

00:15:28.000 Folks

00:15:29.000 When you're

00:15:30.000 When you're out there

00:15:31.000 When you're

00:15:32.000 Sending out feelers

00:15:33.000 Looking out for people

00:15:34.000 With amygdala damage

00:15:35.000 Or leftists

00:15:36.000 Or narcissists 0.50

00:15:37.000 Or people like that

00:15:38.000 This is one of the things

00:15:39.000 You look for

00:15:40.000 If they latch onto

00:15:41.000 A single phrase

00:15:42.000 Somebody said

00:15:43.000 And take

00:15:44.660 And obsess over it

00:15:46.000 And then conspire

00:15:48.000 About it

00:15:48.800 You know

00:15:49.400 Like this

00:15:49.800 This phrase means

00:15:50.700 He's a holocaust denier

00:15:51.900 Or that she's racist 0.99

00:15:53.500 Or that she

00:15:54.640 He

00:15:55.360 She

00:15:55.760 Whatever

00:15:57.160 If

00:15:57.980 If they're making

00:15:58.460 Unwarranted conclusions

00:15:59.780 Based upon

00:16:00.700 A

00:16:01.240 A single statement

00:16:03.040 That's a sign

00:16:04.980 That you're dealing

00:16:05.520 With somebody

00:16:06.020 That's not

00:16:06.540 Fundamentally rational

00:16:07.760 Who lacks a lot

00:16:08.940 Of self-control

00:16:09.760 And who is prone

00:16:11.280 To panics 0.99

00:16:12.640 And if you get

00:16:14.020 Too close to them

00:16:14.820 They are very prone

00:16:16.280 To treachery

00:16:17.340 So

00:16:18.420 Look out for those people

00:16:20.720 And

00:16:21.880 Barini out

00:16:23.560 I want to take

00:16:26.800 I want to take

00:16:27.560 Over and

00:16:29.800 You

00:16:32.380 I

00:16:32.680 I

00:16:33.340 I

00:16:33.800 S

00:16:34.400 Nothing

00:16:36.000 I

00:16:36.880 Thank you.

Leo D.M.J. Aurini - August 21, 2015

R-Type Conspiracy Theories

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript