00:00:42.080You're not holding space for my mental load.
00:00:45.720I need boundaries around my emotional labor.
00:00:49.920I am making a bid for emotional connection before practical correction.1.00
00:00:56.360you toxic, narcissistic abuser. This is my truth. All of this is therapy speak. We need to have a1.00
00:01:02.620national conversation about this. I'm going to credit Dr. Orion Taraban. He did a video on this
00:01:09.400a few weeks ago, where he talked about how the introduction of therapy speak into the discourse,
00:01:13.980specifically in marriage, dating, and relationships, has resulted in the moralizing
00:01:20.380of amoral issues in order to turn a disagreement into a conversation about you being a bad person
00:01:29.140for not obeying, kowtowing, or otherwise submitting to my will. And it's usually women who are doing1.00
00:01:35.940this because toxic femininity historically is the use of undermining that are a low intensity1.00
00:01:42.820conflict tactic set that is just under the radar of violence, but has the same impact. By the way,
00:01:51.700that's one of the unrestricted warfare techniques of the Chinese Communist Party against the United0.97
00:01:56.620States is the use of toxic femininity. Fascinating, is it not? But that's a whole other video.0.86
00:02:02.880Returning to this, the only way to defeat these techniques is to deploy them in a counter strike.
00:02:09.300now this makes a lot of people uncomfortable particularly your principled conservative types
00:02:15.660who believe in having an honest conversation and fairness and what would happen yeah because
00:02:20.660because you can only be fair with women that are fair and women aren't fair so now you gotta you1.00
00:02:25.900gotta bring a gun to a gunfight reversed dish it's about to find out it's about to find out
00:02:32.380what happens when the roles are reversed because what's happening here there is no good faith
00:02:38.540conversation happening in the world of therapy speak you and your your your wife your your
00:02:44.140fiance let's say have a disagreement about let's say a particular activity associated with the
00:02:49.660children or anything that's practical that is well i think we should do it this way i think we should
00:02:54.380do it that way who's going to be here who wants this uh what's happening here what's happening
00:02:58.380there i think it should be this way no i think it should be that and then the moralizing therapy0.98
00:03:03.020speak makes usually the man because shit woman gets it from her therapist it makes the man into0.98
00:03:08.780bad wrong toxic dismissive disrespectful a boundary breaker because oh you won't respect0.99
00:03:16.600my boundaries like boundaries i have around you obeying me at all times and the irony of course
00:03:22.640is that the person deploying the therapy speak accusatory language is the person doing all the
00:03:29.040things that they're saying. The only way to win in this situation, win without fighting. So with
00:03:35.900the vast majority of cases, your best bet's going to be a most expensive divorce lawyer you can find
00:03:40.880in the United States. So that's your first thing. Second thing is to use it right back.
00:03:45.340Law of exact reciprocity has been denigrated by well-meaning individuals over the centuries
00:03:49.600with certain activists claiming that an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.
00:03:54.940we laugh this is obviously not the case eye for an eye laws protect innocent eyes from assault
00:04:00.760by aspiring yes oh my god that's so true an eye for an eye gougers who are now made to fear the
00:04:07.660consequence of that reciprocal eye removal law and rightly so that's without reciprocity we are
00:04:14.780without civilization we become anti-civilization we become unhuman this was true then later and now
00:04:23.560Speaking also of the Aryan Law of Exact Reciprocity, the reason we did not have a nuclear World War III, but rather a Cold War, that standoff over a number of decades with the Soviet Union, was due to this very law.0.68
00:04:36.580The doctrine specifically was called Mutually Assured Destruction, Atomic Diplomacy.0.69