Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1491 Scott Adams： Biden Regret Syndrome (BRS) is Sweeping the Country. Find Out How Bad it is

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and it's time, once again, for the best thing that's ever happened

00:00:08.400 in the history of the universe.

00:00:09.900 It's called coffee with Scott Adams.

00:00:12.360 And it features a very special thing called the simultaneous sip.

00:00:15.680 Some people love it.

00:00:16.560 Some people hate it.

00:00:17.660 But eventually, you'll all love it.

00:00:20.780 You just haven't tried it yet.

00:00:22.100 So, all you need to enjoy this simultaneous sip is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice or stye in a canteen jug or a flask,

00:00:32.880 a vessel of any kind, fill it with your favorite liquid, and I like coffee.

00:00:38.680 Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better.

00:00:45.360 It's called the simultaneous sip, and it's going to happen now.

00:00:48.940 Go.

00:00:52.100 Well, my goal is to make sure that you learn something each and every time you join me here on Coffee with Scott Adams.

00:01:03.600 And we'll see if that happens again today.

00:01:06.520 Speaking of anecdotal persuasion, why is it that the news tells us we should use data and science to make decisions?

00:01:16.040 Are you with me so far?

00:01:17.420 When you say this, CNN, MSNBC, it's one of their main themes is to use science and data, right?

00:01:27.740 What is their other major theme besides you should use science and data?

00:01:34.140 Their other major theme is look at this anecdotal story and draw a conclusion.

00:01:39.300 That's the opposite, isn't it?

00:01:44.380 So make up your mind, mainstream media.

00:01:47.300 Either we should use data and science and logic, which sounds good to me,

00:01:52.860 or you can feed us continuous stories about that one time that one person had that experience,

00:02:00.640 and we'll make our decisions based on that, because you know we will.

00:02:03.720 Well, do you know why you know that the anecdotes will influence us more than the data?

00:02:09.580 How do you know that?

00:02:11.640 Hmm.

00:02:13.180 Science.

00:02:14.400 Yeah.

00:02:15.120 Science can pretty much guarantee that the anecdotes are going to be more persuasive than the data.

00:02:22.520 And yet, while claiming that data is important,

00:02:25.700 they work as hard as they can to make you ignore it with their anecdotes.

00:02:29.240 Here's another one.

00:02:31.980 This one, I forget which news source I got this from, but it doesn't matter.

00:02:38.240 It says that Mississippi's latest COVID surge sees four unvaccinated pregnant women die of a virus in a week

00:02:45.840 in America's least inoculated state.

00:02:51.420 Four unvaccinated pregnant women.

00:02:53.660 They're really taking the anecdotal persuasion up to a 10,

00:02:58.960 because it's bad enough that somebody dies,

00:03:01.320 but when you throw in the unvaccinated and then pregnant and then woman,

00:03:06.540 they're really going deep now for the serious anecdotal persuasion.

00:03:11.440 Well, Rasmussen had a poll

00:03:12.660 and asked people what they thought about rescuing Americans left in Afghanistan,

00:03:18.800 should we need to do that?

00:03:19.920 And 69% of likely voters say the U.S. should use military force

00:03:26.240 to rescue Americans left in Afghanistan.

00:03:28.920 So that's a super majority.

00:03:32.400 How would you like to be the Taliban

00:03:34.200 and know that even though the war just ended,

00:03:37.580 a super majority of American citizens

00:03:39.840 are willing to turn Afghanistan into glass

00:03:44.760 to get our 100 Americans back?

00:03:47.420 It should give you pause.

00:03:51.000 Because if you were to ask also,

00:03:52.880 how much would you be willing to spend

00:03:54.760 to make a military action to get our hostages back?

00:03:59.720 I would say, I'd say the wallet is open, right?

00:04:04.580 So Afghanistan, if you're worried that we're not willing to spend

00:04:08.080 to send some military back there to get them out,

00:04:12.340 you should think about that twice,

00:04:14.340 because we are willing to spend whatever it takes to get them back.

00:04:18.120 If it makes a difference.

00:04:19.240 I don't know if a military operation could possibly work.

00:04:25.140 Only 52% of liberals think we should use military force

00:04:30.820 to rescue Americans if it comes to that.

00:04:33.660 Now, I ask you this.

00:04:35.280 Is this another example of liberals not understanding

00:04:40.080 how human motivation influences systems?

00:04:43.980 Because that seems to be the biggest problem on the left.

00:04:49.000 Consistent.

00:04:49.820 And it influences all their topics.

00:04:52.560 It imagines that you could build a system

00:04:54.720 where people just have good faith

00:04:57.620 and they just operate according to what's good for the whole

00:05:00.500 instead of what's good for themselves.

00:05:02.480 But, of course, nobody operates that way.

00:05:05.120 People operate for themselves.

00:05:07.160 So, once again, liberals don't understand

00:05:10.200 that if you're not at least willing

00:05:11.900 to send a very big-ass military operation back into Afghanistan,

00:05:16.740 if you're not at least willing to do it,

00:05:19.820 you're not going to get any hostages back

00:05:22.140 unless you pay for them or something else.

00:05:24.660 So, once again, liberals don't understand human motivation.

00:05:30.540 Or at least they don't incorporate it

00:05:32.140 in the same way that Republicans do.

00:05:34.400 Or the right does.

00:05:36.480 There's an Emerson poll

00:05:37.800 that says that if Biden and Trump ran right now,

00:05:43.140 Trump would win.

00:05:45.280 If Biden and Trump had a rematch today,

00:05:49.000 Trump would win.

00:05:50.080 Just barely.

00:05:52.260 47% to 46%.

00:05:53.660 And among Democrats,

00:05:56.680 60% of voters said

00:05:58.440 they would like to see Biden

00:05:59.720 as the presidential nominee.

00:06:03.220 What?

00:06:04.940 60% of Democrats

00:06:07.180 are pretty happy with what they got.

00:06:10.960 Really?

00:06:12.180 You can't find one Democrat

00:06:13.800 who might have similar capabilities

00:06:16.420 but had all of his mental faculties

00:06:19.300 and he wasn't 100 years old.

00:06:21.600 Nobody?

00:06:21.920 Nobody in the whole Democrat Party

00:06:24.580 could do better than Joe Biden?

00:06:27.300 So 60% of people say,

00:06:28.820 yeah, let's go with that again.

00:06:31.920 Okay.

00:06:32.600 Now, to be fair,

00:06:33.740 if the situation were reversed,

00:06:35.940 if Trump were in office,

00:06:37.840 probably the poll would look opposite.

00:06:40.340 Because whoever's in office

00:06:41.360 is going to look worse, right?

00:06:43.800 Being in office

00:06:44.860 makes you subject to more criticism.

00:06:46.920 So I think whoever's in office

00:06:49.700 is going to look degraded

00:06:51.280 compared to whoever is just an idea

00:06:53.780 in your head.

00:06:57.740 Now, what other polls do we have?

00:07:00.460 Hmm.

00:07:01.180 I think there's another one coming up here, too.

00:07:05.300 Let's talk about Ron DeSantis.

00:07:07.460 You know, he set up all these

00:07:08.900 Regeneron treatment centers.

00:07:11.160 So you can go in

00:07:12.880 if you've got some symptoms

00:07:14.240 and you've got a diagnosis of COVID,

00:07:18.000 you can go in and get the drip.

00:07:20.180 They'll hook you right up to the Regeneron

00:07:22.020 and get it to you early.

00:07:23.920 And there's, of course,

00:07:25.160 anecdotal,

00:07:26.000 anecdotal report

00:07:27.820 of this guy,

00:07:28.940 Britt Noel,

00:07:29.760 who said that he was feeling bad

00:07:32.540 with the COVID,

00:07:33.300 but they put him on the drip

00:07:34.580 and he immediately felt better.

00:07:36.820 Now, that's not the first time

00:07:38.000 I've heard that.

00:07:39.360 I won't tell somebody else's story,

00:07:41.780 but I did hear somebody else say

00:07:43.420 that nothing worked until the drip.

00:07:47.320 And as soon as you got out of the drip,

00:07:49.200 you just felt better.

00:07:51.000 Just like immediately you felt better.

00:07:53.900 So let's combine two things.

00:07:59.780 Let's say that the Regeneron,

00:08:01.700 according to science,

00:08:03.180 as well as anecdote,

00:08:04.840 don't you like it

00:08:05.540 when science and anecdote agree?

00:08:08.580 Because here's a case.

00:08:10.620 Anecdotally,

00:08:11.120 we hear that Regeneron works,

00:08:12.460 but scientifically,

00:08:13.340 it seems to work as well.

00:08:15.540 If we have enough of it,

00:08:16.740 I think the problem

00:08:17.560 might be supply, actually.

00:08:20.000 But here's my question.

00:08:21.940 You know,

00:08:22.220 Michael Mina has been talking

00:08:23.520 for over a year,

00:08:24.680 I guess,

00:08:25.520 a year and a half,

00:08:26.280 I think,

00:08:26.660 about we should be doing rapid tests,

00:08:29.820 which are not as accurate

00:08:31.220 as the ones you could get

00:08:32.700 at your doctor's office.

00:08:34.640 But they're, you know,

00:08:35.980 90% accurate.

00:08:36.820 So suppose everybody

00:08:38.500 had a cheap rapid test

00:08:39.920 and also access to Regeneron

00:08:43.000 on demand.

00:08:44.740 As soon as they got symptoms,

00:08:46.360 boom,

00:08:46.760 just go get your Regeneron.

00:08:48.400 What would happen

00:08:49.440 if we could catch

00:08:50.600 nine out of ten infections

00:08:52.620 earlier than they normally

00:08:53.880 would have been caught,

00:08:55.460 and all nine of those ten people

00:08:57.140 go get Regeneron right away?

00:08:59.680 I feel like we're done.

00:09:03.600 Don't you?

00:09:04.860 I feel like that would be,

00:09:06.400 that's the end of the pandemic.

00:09:08.640 Nine out of ten catching it early,

00:09:10.920 if in the hypothetical situation,

00:09:12.860 which we don't have now,

00:09:14.280 where you have cheap,

00:09:15.620 ubiquitous testing

00:09:16.660 and everybody's just testing

00:09:17.720 all the time.

00:09:18.640 If you got nine out of ten people,

00:09:21.540 but you missed that tenth one,

00:09:23.600 which is the one

00:09:24.580 you're going to miss,

00:09:25.760 probably?

00:09:26.940 You're probably going to miss

00:09:27.940 the one that didn't have

00:09:28.820 many symptoms.

00:09:30.620 So if the nine out of ten

00:09:31.980 are, on average,

00:09:33.140 the ones who have most symptoms,

00:09:34.640 they're probably the ones

00:09:35.580 with the big viral load,

00:09:37.180 probably the ones

00:09:38.120 who are going to be

00:09:38.660 coughing all over you.

00:09:40.020 I feel like if you got

00:09:41.100 nine out of ten,

00:09:42.860 it's closer to ten out of ten

00:09:44.400 than you think,

00:09:45.760 because that one

00:09:46.400 that they don't get,

00:09:48.140 I'm guessing that the reason

00:09:49.640 they wouldn't get them

00:09:50.420 is because their viral load

00:09:52.420 would be too low.

00:09:53.540 Can somebody give me

00:09:54.140 a fact check on that?

00:09:54.980 Are the tests

00:09:56.420 somewhat inaccurate

00:09:59.580 only based on how much

00:10:02.160 viral stuff there is,

00:10:03.500 or is there another

00:10:04.140 source of inaccuracy

00:10:05.240 besides the operator?

00:10:09.300 So, Michael Mina

00:10:10.520 is pointing out once again

00:10:11.660 that we have not treated

00:10:12.940 the rapid testing

00:10:14.580 the right way,

00:10:15.660 because I guess we treat it

00:10:17.160 as a medical decision,

00:10:20.420 and therefore it goes

00:10:21.300 through some approval process,

00:10:22.760 and therefore we can't

00:10:23.580 have nice things

00:10:24.260 in this country.

00:10:24.980 So, other countries

00:10:26.360 have these rapid tests

00:10:27.580 available,

00:10:28.380 but if you do

00:10:30.080 what Florida has done,

00:10:32.320 which is set up

00:10:32.960 these Regeneron sites

00:10:34.720 where it's easy

00:10:35.520 to just go get the drip,

00:10:38.320 and then on top of that

00:10:39.840 you do the Michael Mina

00:10:41.040 cheap but not perfectly

00:10:43.480 accurate testing,

00:10:44.160 testing,

00:10:44.660 I feel like you're done.

00:10:47.160 Honestly, that feels

00:10:48.600 pretty close to done

00:10:49.840 with the pandemic.

00:10:51.420 It turns it into endemic,

00:10:53.020 where it's just always here

00:10:54.080 but doesn't kill you.

00:10:57.800 Talk about your two movies

00:11:00.100 on one screen.

00:11:02.260 I'm going to read you

00:11:03.440 something from a source

00:11:05.660 that I think is credible,

00:11:07.000 but only credible

00:11:09.160 for this topic.

00:11:10.220 All right?

00:11:10.880 Not credible in general,

00:11:12.640 but just specific

00:11:13.720 to the specific point

00:11:15.300 I'm going to make

00:11:15.820 is credible

00:11:16.380 and is completely

00:11:18.300 opposite of everything

00:11:19.600 I believe to be true.

00:11:21.860 So, here's the fun part.

00:11:24.200 Is this my blind spot?

00:11:27.460 Because some of you

00:11:28.440 are going to have

00:11:28.820 the same experience

00:11:29.700 in a moment

00:11:30.180 when I tell you

00:11:30.740 what the topic is.

00:11:31.860 You're going to say to yourself,

00:11:33.060 wait a minute,

00:11:34.140 that's literally

00:11:34.940 100% opposite

00:11:36.320 of everything

00:11:37.020 I think to be true.

00:11:38.800 But it comes from

00:11:39.720 a strong source.

00:11:41.440 I don't know

00:11:41.840 what to do with this.

00:11:43.140 So, here's the situation.

00:11:45.180 Dr. Pierre Corey,

00:11:47.360 K-R-R-Y,

00:11:48.680 you've heard of him

00:11:49.380 because he's provocative

00:11:50.860 and he's been saying

00:11:51.680 things that are opposite

00:11:52.980 of mainstream

00:11:54.140 medical opinion.

00:11:57.140 And specifically

00:11:57.780 on the I-word.

00:12:00.340 I'm not going to say it

00:12:02.820 because I'll get banned.

00:12:04.700 So, he's a pro-

00:12:06.240 Ivermectin.

00:12:07.660 Okay, I'll just say

00:12:08.400 Ivermectin guy.

00:12:09.980 And here's what he says

00:12:11.180 about the evidence

00:12:12.060 for Ivermectin,

00:12:13.460 which I believe

00:12:14.780 is literally

00:12:15.780 the opposite of true

00:12:17.160 and still believe it.

00:12:19.480 But at the same time,

00:12:21.040 I don't see how

00:12:22.280 he could be wrong

00:12:23.000 about this

00:12:23.540 because it's his field

00:12:24.520 and he's looked into it

00:12:26.560 and he has a deep interest.

00:12:29.200 So, let me tell you

00:12:30.160 what he says.

00:12:31.400 He says that

00:12:32.660 Ivermectin evidence

00:12:33.820 has 31 randomized

00:12:36.540 controlled trials

00:12:37.940 and 32 observational

00:12:40.960 controlled trials,

00:12:42.800 including 26,000 patients

00:12:44.980 and finds,

00:12:45.720 according to him,

00:12:46.620 and this is opposite

00:12:47.940 of mainstream medicine,

00:12:49.460 but he says this,

00:12:50.800 finds large statistically

00:12:52.800 significant reductions

00:12:54.220 in mortality hospitalizations,

00:12:56.380 time to recover

00:12:57.280 and viral clearance.

00:12:58.360 He says the IDSA,

00:13:00.480 which is the

00:13:00.860 Infectious Disease

00:13:01.680 Society of America,

00:13:03.300 won't or can't

00:13:04.840 recommend it

00:13:06.120 because they're captured

00:13:07.020 by research dollars

00:13:08.920 from the NIH.

00:13:10.500 Now,

00:13:11.660 how could my understanding

00:13:13.520 be so opposite?

00:13:16.340 My understanding

00:13:17.100 is that there might be

00:13:18.160 one or two

00:13:19.900 randomized controlled trials

00:13:21.640 and that one of them

00:13:23.320 has been debunked

00:13:24.340 as garbage.

00:13:25.260 That's my understanding.

00:13:28.480 I don't think it's true,

00:13:30.640 but that's my understanding,

00:13:33.640 just maybe two

00:13:34.800 randomized controlled trials.

00:13:36.260 And he's saying

00:13:36.820 there are 31 of them.

00:13:39.080 Could that possibly be true,

00:13:41.420 that there are 31

00:13:42.800 randomized controlled trials

00:13:44.700 for COVID?

00:13:46.500 Yeah,

00:13:49.560 I know you're saying

00:13:50.180 overseas,

00:13:51.160 but I don't feel like it.

00:13:54.060 So,

00:13:54.480 yeah,

00:13:54.720 and then 32

00:13:55.500 that are observational.

00:13:59.640 So,

00:14:00.300 Brett

00:14:00.600 Weinstein

00:14:03.060 has been saying

00:14:03.620 the same thing.

00:14:05.000 Why is it that

00:14:05.800 we don't even know this?

00:14:08.400 How could we think

00:14:09.660 there might be

00:14:10.180 one or two

00:14:10.920 and one of them

00:14:12.040 is clearly debunked

00:14:13.300 and then people

00:14:14.580 who clearly know

00:14:15.620 what they're talking about

00:14:16.480 say there are 31?

00:14:18.740 What the hell is going on?

00:14:20.400 I don't even have

00:14:21.240 an opinion.

00:14:22.500 I don't know which it is.

00:14:23.460 Is it two

00:14:24.140 and one of them

00:14:25.680 is bullshit

00:14:26.100 or is it 31

00:14:28.220 and they're pretty good?

00:14:29.940 What the hell

00:14:30.680 is going on?

00:14:32.160 I have no idea here.

00:14:33.820 This is

00:14:34.140 completely baffling.

00:14:35.640 No idea.

00:14:38.200 All right,

00:14:38.740 here's something

00:14:39.200 to scare you.

00:14:41.060 TikTok

00:14:41.500 has overtaken

00:14:42.640 YouTube

00:14:43.060 for most minutes

00:14:44.320 watched.

00:14:45.620 Did you hear that?

00:14:49.100 TikTok

00:14:49.420 just overtook

00:14:50.940 YouTube

00:14:51.460 for most minutes

00:14:53.500 watched

00:14:54.020 and TikTok

00:14:55.340 is a Chinese

00:14:57.040 brainwashing app.

00:14:59.460 Now,

00:14:59.920 they don't say that.

00:15:01.440 That's my

00:15:01.940 allegation.

00:15:03.680 And there are

00:15:04.500 some assumptions

00:15:05.040 and speculation

00:15:05.680 built into this

00:15:06.480 allegation.

00:15:07.500 So when you

00:15:08.120 sue me,

00:15:08.560 TikTok,

00:15:09.580 I'm going to

00:15:10.100 back up and say,

00:15:10.900 whoa,

00:15:11.180 I didn't say it was true.

00:15:12.740 I said it looks

00:15:13.300 like it's true.

00:15:14.740 Sure looks like it.

00:15:16.060 That's all I know.

00:15:17.360 I just know

00:15:18.180 it looks that way.

00:15:20.320 And

00:15:20.720 the interesting

00:15:23.500 thing is the

00:15:24.220 content on TikTok.

00:15:26.360 I would like to

00:15:27.160 give you my

00:15:27.900 impression

00:15:28.340 of everybody

00:15:30.040 on TikTok.

00:15:30.820 Can you handle it?

00:15:33.360 My impression

00:15:34.300 of every video

00:15:36.220 on TikTok.

00:15:37.060 Now,

00:15:37.780 I'm not very good

00:15:38.960 at dancing,

00:15:39.860 so you'll have to

00:15:41.080 look past my

00:15:41.780 dance moves.

00:15:43.100 I want you

00:15:43.580 to concentrate

00:15:44.180 just on my

00:15:45.000 impression

00:15:45.380 of the

00:15:46.020 facial part.

00:15:48.440 So I think

00:15:48.940 from,

00:15:49.300 you know,

00:15:49.760 chin to head,

00:15:50.800 I'm going to

00:15:51.200 be nailing

00:15:51.700 this impression.

00:15:53.120 The rest

00:15:53.820 of my body,

00:15:54.580 well,

00:15:54.920 not so good.

00:15:57.000 But let me

00:15:58.340 see if I can

00:15:58.860 get into the

00:15:59.460 mood for

00:16:01.240 your first

00:16:02.060 every single

00:16:03.460 TikTok

00:16:03.860 video

00:16:05.420 that you've

00:16:06.380 seen.

00:16:06.620 and

00:16:21.580 seen.

00:16:25.980 Now,

00:16:26.500 my understanding

00:16:27.180 is that in

00:16:28.920 order to make

00:16:29.480 a perfect

00:16:30.340 TikTok

00:16:31.240 dance video,

00:16:32.880 you've got to

00:16:34.080 have many

00:16:34.440 elements.

00:16:35.180 One of the

00:16:35.540 elements you

00:16:36.020 should have

00:16:36.520 is an

00:16:36.860 attractive

00:16:37.240 person,

00:16:38.280 male or

00:16:38.760 female,

00:16:40.000 ideally younger,

00:16:41.780 but attractive.

00:16:43.340 That attractive

00:16:44.240 person should

00:16:45.000 have some

00:16:45.480 dance moves.

00:16:46.480 That makes

00:16:47.060 it a little

00:16:47.400 bit more

00:16:47.780 viral.

00:16:48.320 You know,

00:16:48.500 can move

00:16:49.060 pretty good.

00:16:50.320 But on top

00:16:51.060 of that,

00:16:52.000 they have to

00:16:52.440 do something

00:16:53.000 with the

00:16:53.500 face that

00:16:55.720 makes you

00:16:56.160 want to

00:16:56.520 punch them

00:16:57.140 with a

00:16:58.320 brick.

00:16:59.940 Now,

00:17:00.440 don't do

00:17:00.780 that.

00:17:01.300 I'm very

00:17:01.800 much opposed

00:17:02.480 to violence.

00:17:04.120 But you

00:17:05.140 can't really

00:17:05.660 watch a

00:17:06.140 TikTok

00:17:06.440 video without

00:17:08.180 wanting to

00:17:08.900 smash the

00:17:09.680 people in

00:17:10.120 them with

00:17:10.540 bricks.

00:17:12.040 Am I the

00:17:12.720 only one

00:17:13.000 who thinks

00:17:13.300 that?

00:17:15.720 It's not

00:17:16.300 just me.

00:17:18.080 Come on.

00:17:20.900 Come on.

00:17:21.580 It's not

00:17:21.900 just me.

00:17:23.680 Yeah,

00:17:24.180 you want to

00:17:24.600 kill all of

00:17:25.180 them with a

00:17:25.580 brick.

00:17:26.500 You do.

00:17:27.220 You just

00:17:28.520 want to

00:17:28.780 murder them.

00:17:30.260 Now,

00:17:30.900 I assume

00:17:32.560 that this

00:17:33.000 is what

00:17:33.480 China's

00:17:34.540 master

00:17:34.880 plan is.

00:17:36.680 I think

00:17:37.260 the

00:17:37.420 master

00:17:37.700 plan

00:17:38.080 is to

00:17:38.500 make us

00:17:38.900 hate each

00:17:39.580 other with

00:17:40.020 such a

00:17:40.440 passion

00:17:40.800 because

00:17:42.160 that face

00:17:44.160 you've got

00:17:44.540 to hit

00:17:44.700 with a

00:17:44.980 brick.

00:17:46.900 I mean,

00:17:47.380 you really

00:17:47.680 just have

00:17:48.060 to hit

00:17:48.260 that with

00:17:48.540 a brick.

00:17:49.360 Don't do

00:17:49.880 that,

00:17:50.320 though.

00:17:50.660 It's

00:17:50.840 violent.

00:17:52.920 Have you

00:17:53.400 seen the

00:17:53.680 video of

00:17:54.200 Obama?

00:17:55.140 I think

00:17:55.760 it's a

00:17:56.080 real video.

00:17:57.320 But,

00:17:57.580 you know,

00:17:57.720 you have

00:17:57.960 all these

00:17:58.320 deepfake

00:17:58.960 videos of

00:18:00.360 Obama,

00:18:01.440 but it

00:18:01.860 looked real.

00:18:02.920 So if

00:18:03.220 somebody can

00:18:03.740 fact-check

00:18:04.280 me on

00:18:04.620 this,

00:18:05.200 apparently he

00:18:05.920 was talking

00:18:06.340 to Colbert

00:18:07.140 about a

00:18:08.420 hypothetical

00:18:09.300 third term,

00:18:11.140 and he

00:18:11.400 said if he

00:18:11.880 could just

00:18:12.300 be behind

00:18:12.840 the scenes

00:18:13.460 sort of as

00:18:14.540 a puppet

00:18:15.040 master and

00:18:16.380 tell other

00:18:16.940 people what

00:18:17.420 to say,

00:18:18.580 but he

00:18:18.880 didn't have

00:18:19.260 to be

00:18:19.500 president,

00:18:20.400 you know,

00:18:20.540 he could

00:18:20.760 just have

00:18:21.120 somebody as

00:18:21.640 a front

00:18:22.360 for him

00:18:22.860 and his

00:18:23.400 opinions,

00:18:25.000 that that

00:18:25.820 would be his

00:18:26.240 ideal situation

00:18:27.120 for a third

00:18:28.040 term.

00:18:28.960 Now,

00:18:33.940 I hear

00:18:34.740 people saying

00:18:35.280 that it

00:18:36.480 looks like

00:18:36.840 a real

00:18:37.220 clip.

00:18:38.320 Now,

00:18:38.480 I think

00:18:38.680 he was

00:18:39.060 somewhat

00:18:40.180 joking,

00:18:42.060 but maybe

00:18:42.800 not so

00:18:43.340 much,

00:18:44.080 because it

00:18:45.540 does look

00:18:46.220 like he

00:18:46.720 might be

00:18:47.120 behind the

00:18:47.600 scenes

00:18:47.860 pulling some

00:18:48.500 strings.

00:18:49.580 Now,

00:18:49.860 I don't

00:18:50.040 think he's

00:18:50.440 going to

00:18:50.660 admit it

00:18:51.080 after

00:18:51.380 Afghanistan,

00:18:52.680 but maybe.

00:18:53.980 Now,

00:18:54.400 let's talk

00:18:54.740 about

00:18:55.080 BRS.

00:18:57.140 Have you

00:18:57.440 heard of

00:18:57.660 BRS?

00:18:58.260 It's a

00:18:59.140 medical

00:18:59.440 condition.

00:19:01.180 It's

00:19:01.780 sort of

00:19:02.240 sweeping the

00:19:02.800 country.

00:19:04.040 And it

00:19:04.240 stands for

00:19:04.680 Biden

00:19:05.040 Regret

00:19:05.620 Syndrome,

00:19:06.560 BRS.

00:19:07.880 And there

00:19:09.580 was a

00:19:09.840 poll by,

00:19:10.740 let's

00:19:11.240 see,

00:19:11.860 somebody,

00:19:16.240 that says

00:19:17.000 one-fifth of

00:19:17.820 voters who

00:19:18.500 voted for

00:19:20.200 Biden now

00:19:21.980 want their

00:19:22.380 vote back.

00:19:22.960 vote.

00:19:24.940 What?

00:19:25.980 One-fifth of

00:19:27.440 the people

00:19:27.880 who voted

00:19:28.400 for Biden

00:19:29.100 wish they

00:19:30.420 could change

00:19:30.900 their vote

00:19:31.280 now.

00:19:32.620 One-fifth.

00:19:34.960 Do you

00:19:35.620 know how

00:19:36.100 not close

00:19:36.880 an election

00:19:37.400 would be

00:19:37.920 if one-fifth

00:19:38.780 of the people

00:19:39.240 really did

00:19:39.760 change their

00:19:40.240 vote from

00:19:40.640 Biden?

00:19:41.440 Wouldn't

00:19:41.700 be close.

00:19:43.220 It would

00:19:43.480 be the

00:19:43.720 biggest

00:19:43.940 landslide

00:19:44.500 of any

00:19:44.880 election,

00:19:45.320 probably.

00:19:46.340 Now,

00:19:46.780 I don't

00:19:47.000 know how

00:19:47.300 much to

00:19:47.660 believe that

00:19:48.240 about this

00:19:49.360 20%.

00:19:50.280 It sounds

00:19:50.660 high,

00:19:51.480 especially

00:19:51.920 when there

00:19:52.320 was the

00:19:52.700 other poll

00:19:53.220 I mentioned

00:19:53.680 that showed

00:19:54.120 that they're

00:19:54.440 running neck

00:19:54.940 and neck.

00:19:55.860 So I'm

00:19:56.500 not sure I

00:19:56.880 believe both

00:19:57.380 of those

00:19:57.680 polls.

00:19:58.480 I think

00:19:58.800 you have

00:19:58.980 to pick

00:19:59.260 one because

00:19:59.760 they seem

00:20:00.100 a little

00:20:00.320 bit

00:20:00.600 conflicty.

00:20:03.000 So it

00:20:03.860 was Zogby

00:20:04.380 that found

00:20:04.860 that 20%

00:20:05.980 of Biden

00:20:07.380 voters have

00:20:07.920 some regret.

00:20:10.280 But nearly

00:20:12.780 three in

00:20:13.440 10 or

00:20:14.440 29% of

00:20:15.560 Republicans

00:20:16.120 who voted

00:20:16.700 for Biden

00:20:17.300 regretted it.

00:20:19.300 Well,

00:20:19.820 only 20%

00:20:20.620 of Democrats

00:20:21.340 regretted it.

00:20:22.860 And only

00:20:23.120 14% of

00:20:23.920 independents.

00:20:25.420 So independents

00:20:26.340 seem pretty

00:20:27.740 happy with

00:20:28.240 their vote.

00:20:29.280 So the

00:20:29.580 independents

00:20:30.180 who voted

00:20:30.580 for Biden

00:20:31.480 are like,

00:20:32.340 yeah,

00:20:32.620 I think

00:20:32.920 we nailed

00:20:33.300 it.

00:20:34.040 I think

00:20:34.400 he's doing

00:20:34.780 a fine

00:20:35.320 job.

00:20:36.660 Well,

00:20:37.180 here's the

00:20:37.520 funny part.

00:20:39.480 Vice

00:20:39.800 President

00:20:40.200 Harris

00:20:41.160 is going

00:20:41.720 to campaign

00:20:43.120 with Gavin

00:20:44.080 Newsom in

00:20:44.620 California

00:20:45.060 to try

00:20:45.660 to get

00:20:46.140 him to

00:20:46.820 prevail

00:20:48.180 against

00:20:48.860 the recall

00:20:49.580 and I

00:20:50.700 wonder how

00:20:51.160 that

00:20:51.400 conversation

00:20:52.100 went.

00:20:53.720 Hmm.

00:20:55.280 Imagine

00:20:55.760 little

00:20:56.420 noise

00:20:56.960 that is

00:20:57.840 the noise

00:20:58.780 that indicates

00:20:59.420 I'm thinking

00:21:00.160 or imagining

00:21:01.340 the scene.

00:21:02.640 Ding,

00:21:02.820 ding,

00:21:03.100 ding,

00:21:03.240 ding.

00:21:04.720 Imagine

00:21:05.280 the White

00:21:08.560 House

00:21:08.880 contacts

00:21:10.280 Gavin Newsom

00:21:11.060 and says,

00:21:12.280 hey,

00:21:12.500 Gavin Newsom,

00:21:13.180 we want to

00:21:13.660 make sure

00:21:14.120 that you

00:21:14.680 win and

00:21:15.200 you recall.

00:21:15.600 we'd

00:21:17.000 like to

00:21:17.240 have

00:21:17.420 President

00:21:17.840 Biden

00:21:18.280 come out

00:21:19.480 and maybe

00:21:20.260 campaign

00:21:20.660 with you

00:21:21.100 and give

00:21:21.380 you a

00:21:21.660 boost.

00:21:22.940 And you

00:21:23.160 can see

00:21:23.520 Newsom

00:21:23.860 on the

00:21:24.140 phone.

00:21:26.400 That is

00:21:27.180 very

00:21:27.720 generous

00:21:28.200 of you.

00:21:29.780 Very

00:21:30.300 generous

00:21:30.800 to send

00:21:31.380 Joe Biden

00:21:32.080 right after

00:21:32.640 the Afghanistan

00:21:33.400 debacle

00:21:34.220 so that I

00:21:35.840 will be

00:21:36.460 thought of

00:21:37.780 in the

00:21:38.060 same vein

00:21:38.760 as the

00:21:39.420 most

00:21:39.620 incompetent

00:21:40.280 president

00:21:40.640 of all

00:21:41.200 time.

00:21:42.280 No

00:21:42.580 thank

00:21:42.860 you.

00:21:44.260 And

00:21:44.460 then the

00:21:44.720 White

00:21:44.860 House

00:21:45.040 says,

00:21:45.540 okay,

00:21:45.880 okay,

00:21:46.100 we get

00:21:46.460 it,

00:21:46.780 it's a

00:21:47.220 bad

00:21:47.380 time.

00:21:48.540 But we

00:21:49.140 got a

00:21:49.360 backup

00:21:49.620 plan.

00:21:50.660 We have

00:21:50.920 a backup

00:21:51.280 plan.

00:21:52.700 And

00:21:52.940 Gavin

00:21:53.200 Newsom

00:21:53.540 says,

00:21:54.020 thank

00:21:55.060 goodness,

00:21:56.300 I don't

00:21:56.660 need to

00:21:57.360 hear the

00:21:57.660 details,

00:21:58.700 but please

00:21:59.420 don't do

00:22:01.660 my campaign

00:22:02.600 by sending

00:22:03.660 me Joe

00:22:04.160 Biden.

00:22:06.000 I mean,

00:22:06.360 nobody's

00:22:06.700 going to

00:22:06.940 give me

00:22:07.240 an extra

00:22:07.600 vote because

00:22:08.140 Joe Biden,

00:22:08.840 the architect

00:22:10.260 of the

00:22:10.920 Afghan

00:22:11.400 disaster,

00:22:12.580 don't want

00:22:13.200 that,

00:22:14.120 so just

00:22:14.540 send somebody

00:22:15.420 good.

00:22:17.920 Next thing

00:22:18.760 he hears is

00:22:19.320 that Kamala

00:22:19.840 Harris has

00:22:20.440 been chosen,

00:22:22.000 literally the

00:22:23.380 vice president

00:22:24.420 that most

00:22:25.480 people think

00:22:26.200 isn't up

00:22:27.080 for the

00:22:27.360 job.

00:22:28.580 The

00:22:28.780 person,

00:22:30.040 the only

00:22:30.540 person in

00:22:31.120 American

00:22:31.480 politics right

00:22:32.380 now,

00:22:33.920 fact check

00:22:34.480 me on

00:22:34.800 this,

00:22:35.340 but probably

00:22:36.640 the lowest

00:22:37.720 regarded

00:22:38.360 politician in

00:22:40.200 the national

00:22:40.840 domain.

00:22:41.580 would you

00:22:42.640 say?

00:22:43.540 Could you

00:22:43.960 think of

00:22:44.260 anybody in

00:22:44.780 the national

00:22:45.440 domain,

00:22:46.280 not the

00:22:46.720 states,

00:22:47.300 not governors,

00:22:48.500 but in

00:22:49.080 the national

00:22:49.600 domain,

00:22:50.380 is there

00:22:50.700 anybody with

00:22:51.640 a worse

00:22:52.060 reputation

00:22:52.880 right now?

00:22:55.260 Pelosi?

00:22:56.200 I don't know.

00:22:56.860 Pelosi is

00:22:57.380 probably really

00:22:57.940 popular with

00:22:58.620 their own

00:22:59.000 team,

00:22:59.320 though.

00:23:00.540 I can't,

00:23:00.880 I can't,

00:23:01.400 well,

00:23:01.660 Omar,

00:23:02.160 okay,

00:23:02.680 that would

00:23:03.040 have been,

00:23:06.200 yeah,

00:23:07.880 Omar might

00:23:08.380 be less

00:23:08.720 popular.

00:23:09.260 Okay,

00:23:09.580 that would

00:23:09.780 be a good

00:23:10.340 example.

00:23:11.580 But poor

00:23:12.840 Governor Newsom,

00:23:14.100 he seems

00:23:14.560 doomed,

00:23:15.200 because if

00:23:15.940 you have

00:23:16.280 to rely

00:23:16.840 on the

00:23:17.940 glow of

00:23:20.220 Kamala

00:23:20.820 Harris'

00:23:21.460 reputation

00:23:22.060 to pull

00:23:23.060 you over

00:23:23.420 the finish

00:23:24.180 line,

00:23:25.380 you might

00:23:26.660 not make

00:23:27.100 it over

00:23:27.320 the finish

00:23:27.740 line,

00:23:28.320 so it's

00:23:28.700 not looking

00:23:29.060 good.

00:23:30.480 Meanwhile,

00:23:31.280 over in

00:23:31.700 Chicago,

00:23:32.520 46 people,

00:23:33.920 including

00:23:34.300 eight children,

00:23:35.060 have been

00:23:35.340 shot over

00:23:36.260 the weekend.

00:23:36.780 46 people

00:23:38.800 shot in

00:23:40.300 Chicago over

00:23:41.140 the weekend.

00:23:42.480 Question,

00:23:44.000 how many

00:23:44.480 people were

00:23:44.980 shot in

00:23:45.500 Kabul over

00:23:46.260 the weekend?

00:23:48.040 I mean,

00:23:48.660 actually,

00:23:49.100 seriously,

00:23:50.040 how many

00:23:50.760 people in

00:23:51.420 Kabul were

00:23:53.000 shot over

00:23:54.620 the weekend?

00:23:55.920 I mean,

00:23:56.220 it might have

00:23:56.580 been more,

00:23:57.980 but you're

00:23:59.660 not sure,

00:24:00.260 are you?

00:24:01.700 It might have

00:24:02.560 been more,

00:24:03.620 could have

00:24:03.940 been a lot

00:24:04.280 more,

00:24:05.520 but you're

00:24:06.140 not sure.

00:24:07.740 Just think

00:24:08.200 about that.

00:24:09.400 Think about

00:24:09.920 the fact

00:24:10.360 that off

00:24:10.780 the top

00:24:11.160 of your

00:24:11.340 head,

00:24:11.940 you're not

00:24:12.720 sure if

00:24:13.980 Chicago had

00:24:14.700 more gun

00:24:15.200 violence than

00:24:15.880 Kabul this

00:24:16.600 weekend.

00:24:18.400 I don't

00:24:19.000 know.

00:24:20.460 Yeah.

00:24:22.960 Well,

00:24:23.500 here's the

00:24:23.880 fun part.

00:24:24.600 I know,

00:24:25.100 you're waiting

00:24:25.440 for the good

00:24:25.860 part.

00:24:26.700 I took you

00:24:27.160 through all

00:24:27.440 the bad

00:24:27.720 part to get

00:24:28.220 to the good

00:24:28.520 part,

00:24:28.780 to make it

00:24:29.120 feel extra,

00:24:30.240 extra good,

00:24:30.980 and watch

00:24:31.520 how good this

00:24:32.080 feels.

00:24:33.240 We have

00:24:33.660 some news

00:24:34.080 about the

00:24:34.420 upcoming

00:24:34.820 Arizona

00:24:35.700 audit results.

00:24:38.920 And from

00:24:39.380 this tweet,

00:24:40.180 whose name

00:24:41.100 I didn't

00:24:41.440 write down,

00:24:41.960 Wendy,

00:24:42.620 Wendy,

00:24:43.720 I don't know,

00:24:44.880 and the

00:24:47.100 tweet says,

00:24:47.620 the audit

00:24:47.940 is coming,

00:24:48.640 guys,

00:24:49.340 I promise

00:24:50.080 you.

00:24:50.420 Now,

00:24:50.620 here's what

00:24:50.900 we're going

00:24:51.160 to do.

00:24:51.420 We're going

00:24:51.700 to read

00:24:52.020 between the

00:24:52.560 lines,

00:24:53.120 okay?

00:24:53.840 So I'm

00:24:54.240 going to

00:24:54.420 read you

00:24:54.760 the tweet

00:24:55.240 and the

00:24:56.240 rest of

00:24:56.540 the thread,

00:24:57.740 and then I

00:24:58.200 want you

00:24:58.520 to see

00:24:59.000 if Wendy

00:25:01.000 Rogers,

00:25:01.520 yes,

00:25:01.800 thank you,

00:25:02.160 it's a

00:25:02.360 Wendy Rogers

00:25:02.940 tweet,

00:25:03.660 and I

00:25:04.420 want you

00:25:04.740 to see

00:25:05.040 if you

00:25:05.320 can read

00:25:05.700 between

00:25:06.040 the lines

00:25:06.680 and tell

00:25:07.720 me if

00:25:08.060 Wendy Rogers

00:25:08.740 is hinting

00:25:09.920 to you

00:25:10.380 that there's

00:25:11.180 something big

00:25:11.820 coming,

00:25:13.080 or is she

00:25:14.700 hinting that

00:25:15.360 they didn't

00:25:15.720 find anything?

00:25:17.620 All right?

00:25:18.100 So we're

00:25:18.560 going to read

00:25:18.840 between the

00:25:19.320 lines and

00:25:19.920 see what

00:25:20.340 you think.

00:25:21.480 Did they

00:25:21.800 find the

00:25:22.360 goods,

00:25:23.420 or did

00:25:23.760 they not?

00:25:24.280 Because at

00:25:24.660 this point,

00:25:25.140 they'd be

00:25:25.460 signaling to

00:25:26.080 us in

00:25:26.400 advance,

00:25:26.900 I think.

00:25:27.980 All right?

00:25:28.240 So I'll

00:25:28.460 read it again.

00:25:29.180 Look for

00:25:29.520 that.

00:25:29.820 The audit

00:25:31.100 is coming,

00:25:31.700 guys.

00:25:32.020 I promise

00:25:32.480 you.

00:25:33.100 I get a lot

00:25:33.680 of comments

00:25:34.160 asking,

00:25:34.800 and people

00:25:35.100 think I can

00:25:35.680 speed it up,

00:25:36.340 but I can't

00:25:36.900 speed it up.

00:25:37.900 It is a process,

00:25:38.860 and it is coming.

00:25:40.260 Also, other

00:25:41.440 information is

00:25:42.480 coming out I

00:25:43.440 can't disclose.

00:25:45.840 Just know that

00:25:46.980 it is all

00:25:47.540 going to

00:25:48.060 happen, and

00:25:49.660 this is real.

00:25:51.900 Keep the

00:25:52.400 faith.

00:25:53.680 Make sure

00:25:54.020 your state is

00:25:54.700 doing an

00:25:55.020 audit, because

00:25:55.480 when our

00:25:55.860 audit comes

00:25:56.380 out, the

00:25:57.360 next steps

00:25:57.940 are to get

00:25:59.320 this done in

00:26:00.040 other states.

00:26:01.320 Start pushing

00:26:02.040 that now.

00:26:04.480 Okay?

00:26:05.700 Now, did

00:26:07.020 you hear in

00:26:07.660 any of those

00:26:08.180 words an

00:26:09.620 indication that

00:26:10.620 they found

00:26:11.260 enough fraud

00:26:12.200 that would

00:26:12.660 change the

00:26:13.300 outcome of

00:26:13.780 the election?

00:26:15.060 How many

00:26:15.540 people think

00:26:16.220 that this is

00:26:17.500 hinting that

00:26:18.140 they found

00:26:18.640 it?

00:26:19.240 They found

00:26:19.700 the goods?

00:26:20.960 I'm going to

00:26:21.500 look at your

00:26:21.960 comments.

00:26:23.160 I'm saying

00:26:23.620 no's, yes's,

00:26:24.840 no's, maybe

00:26:26.800 nothing, huge,

00:26:29.600 nope, yep,

00:26:30.400 yep, I'm

00:26:31.020 saying yes's

00:26:31.580 and no's.

00:26:32.580 So you're

00:26:32.980 kind of split,

00:26:33.820 but I think

00:26:34.200 more no's

00:26:34.760 than yes's.

00:26:35.740 Here is my

00:26:36.580 official opinion.

00:26:38.440 This looks

00:26:39.200 like a no.

00:26:41.200 Right?

00:26:41.580 Now, we

00:26:41.940 can't know

00:26:42.280 for sure, so

00:26:43.020 we're all

00:26:43.660 just guessing

00:26:44.360 and trying

00:26:45.380 to calculate

00:26:46.260 the odds

00:26:46.720 here.

00:26:47.480 But if I

00:26:48.080 had to

00:26:48.580 place a

00:26:49.020 bet, I

00:26:50.980 would bet

00:26:51.420 that the

00:26:51.780 outcome, just

00:26:52.440 based on

00:26:52.980 reading between

00:26:53.680 the lines,

00:26:54.540 my bet is

00:26:55.320 that they

00:26:55.720 will find

00:26:56.400 some fraud

00:26:57.100 or they

00:26:59.800 will find

00:27:00.380 that there

00:27:00.900 could have

00:27:01.580 been enough

00:27:02.660 fraud, but

00:27:04.160 they couldn't

00:27:04.800 prove it.

00:27:06.540 So I think

00:27:07.180 where this is

00:27:07.720 going to come

00:27:08.100 out is there

00:27:09.580 could have

00:27:10.160 been fraud,

00:27:10.840 fraud, but

00:27:11.180 we couldn't

00:27:11.640 look at

00:27:11.960 everything, but

00:27:13.560 we didn't

00:27:13.980 find enough.

00:27:14.800 We found

00:27:15.220 a little, and

00:27:16.520 that suggests

00:27:17.100 that there

00:27:17.800 is fraud, not

00:27:19.160 necessarily enough

00:27:20.180 to change any

00:27:20.900 result, but

00:27:22.660 we think that

00:27:24.400 it could be

00:27:24.980 there because

00:27:25.680 we couldn't

00:27:26.220 check everything.

00:27:28.800 You want to

00:27:29.700 bet against

00:27:30.100 that prediction?

00:27:31.400 I wouldn't

00:27:31.980 bet against

00:27:32.440 that prediction.

00:27:33.000 as predictions

00:27:35.560 go, that

00:27:37.820 one's probably

00:27:38.820 as accurate as

00:27:40.800 any prediction

00:27:41.380 will ever be.

00:27:42.420 If you've

00:27:42.860 lived in the

00:27:43.360 real world, you

00:27:44.760 know that they

00:27:45.300 didn't find it.

00:27:46.880 Because if they

00:27:47.740 found the goods,

00:27:49.740 Wendy would

00:27:50.340 have tipped us

00:27:51.460 off.

00:27:53.400 Absolutely, you

00:27:54.440 would know by

00:27:55.060 now that

00:27:55.820 something's

00:27:56.320 coming.

00:27:57.060 But instead,

00:27:58.360 instead of

00:27:58.960 telling you that

00:27:59.520 they found

00:28:00.120 something in the

00:28:01.060 audit, here's

00:28:02.180 what she

00:28:02.520 teases.

00:28:04.460 She said,

00:28:05.320 also, other

00:28:06.140 information is

00:28:06.940 coming out I

00:28:07.620 can't disclose.

00:28:09.560 So that's the

00:28:10.500 part that made

00:28:10.980 you think, oh,

00:28:11.540 she's got some

00:28:12.160 good stuff, right?

00:28:13.620 She's got other

00:28:14.480 information, and

00:28:15.840 she's hinting at

00:28:16.580 us she can't

00:28:17.620 disclose.

00:28:19.180 There's no way

00:28:20.360 that she's

00:28:21.300 referring to

00:28:21.900 finding a bunch

00:28:22.700 of fraud, or

00:28:24.420 at least enough

00:28:25.440 fraud to change

00:28:26.220 the election

00:28:26.620 outcome.

00:28:27.780 There's no way

00:28:28.640 that's what that

00:28:29.280 means.

00:28:30.320 What it means

00:28:31.020 is that the

00:28:32.520 they may have

00:28:33.080 moved the

00:28:33.460 goalposts.

00:28:34.900 It might mean

00:28:36.040 that they're

00:28:37.040 trying to find a

00:28:37.780 shiny object to

00:28:38.680 concentrate on, so

00:28:40.160 it looks like the

00:28:40.780 audit found

00:28:41.300 something.

00:28:42.820 That's what it

00:28:43.460 looks like.

00:28:44.480 So if I had to

00:28:45.420 put money on it,

00:28:46.260 I'd say they

00:28:46.700 didn't find

00:28:47.140 anything, or

00:28:48.220 they didn't find

00:28:48.820 enough to change

00:28:50.220 the result, but

00:28:51.540 they might try to

00:28:52.240 paint it as if

00:28:53.120 maybe they did,

00:28:54.000 almost sort of,

00:28:55.080 kind of.

00:28:55.600 let's talk about

00:29:00.000 climate change.

00:29:02.400 So the news is

00:29:04.780 saying it's

00:29:05.180 affecting people's

00:29:06.740 health, and that

00:29:09.800 world leaders need

00:29:10.780 to address the

00:29:11.620 climate crisis now

00:29:12.820 because we're all

00:29:14.600 going to die from

00:29:15.840 the climate crisis,

00:29:17.280 and why it

00:29:18.420 matters.

00:29:18.820 So a bunch of

00:29:19.780 publications got

00:29:20.600 together to issue a

00:29:22.520 joint statement to

00:29:23.340 world leaders, and

00:29:25.100 apparently it's the

00:29:25.740 first time so

00:29:26.640 many independent,

00:29:28.500 well, so many

00:29:29.260 organizations got

00:29:30.720 together with the

00:29:31.300 same message.

00:29:32.360 So here are the

00:29:33.040 ones that are

00:29:34.220 saying that the

00:29:35.460 climate change is

00:29:36.640 going to cause

00:29:37.120 severe health care

00:29:38.920 bad outcomes.

00:29:40.460 Among them are

00:29:41.180 the American

00:29:41.760 Medical Association,

00:29:44.860 the Lancet, and

00:29:46.860 the British Medical

00:29:47.860 Journal.

00:29:48.980 So those were

00:29:49.560 among the many,

00:29:50.680 many entities that

00:29:52.620 were saying that

00:29:53.360 climate change is a

00:29:54.480 big problem.

00:29:55.100 How do you feel

00:29:56.780 about that?

00:29:58.240 Because the

00:29:58.880 Lancet, the

00:30:00.440 Lancet says it's a

00:30:01.340 big problem.

00:30:02.800 So they're

00:30:03.560 credible, right?

00:30:05.420 No.

00:30:06.420 No, they're not

00:30:07.340 credible.

00:30:08.240 Not at all.

00:30:09.500 American Medical

00:30:10.260 Association, not so

00:30:12.300 much.

00:30:13.320 Not so much.

00:30:14.440 No, I would say

00:30:15.060 these are not

00:30:15.680 credible organizations.

00:30:17.420 Now, that doesn't

00:30:18.000 mean they're wrong.

00:30:19.960 You know, I'm

00:30:21.160 actually concerned.

00:30:22.040 I think that the

00:30:23.740 concern that

00:30:24.680 climate change

00:30:25.840 could cause

00:30:26.560 medical problems

00:30:27.820 around the world,

00:30:28.600 that's something we

00:30:29.240 should really worry

00:30:29.980 about.

00:30:30.700 Because whether or

00:30:31.580 not it's human

00:30:32.320 caused or not,

00:30:33.440 you're going to end

00:30:34.400 up with the same

00:30:35.040 health problem.

00:30:37.220 So, yeah, it's a

00:30:39.800 little like,

00:30:40.300 exactly, somebody

00:30:41.120 saying in the

00:30:41.580 comments on

00:30:42.120 locals, it's a

00:30:43.440 little like these

00:30:44.020 17 intel agencies

00:30:45.560 all agreeing.

00:30:46.220 agreeing, it's

00:30:47.920 never 17 intel

00:30:49.260 agencies agreeing.

00:30:50.800 It's a few people

00:30:51.920 in one of them

00:30:52.540 looked into it, and

00:30:53.880 the other intel

00:30:54.700 agencies said,

00:30:56.260 well, that guy

00:30:57.260 looks competent, so

00:30:58.260 we agree.

00:30:59.900 That's it.

00:31:00.780 A few people in

00:31:01.600 one organization, and

00:31:02.880 then all 17 say,

00:31:03.960 yeah, that sounds

00:31:04.500 credible.

00:31:05.560 Yeah, we're in.

00:31:07.660 So, that's what

00:31:09.660 that looks like,

00:31:10.220 too.

00:31:11.580 All right.

00:31:11.940 That is everything

00:31:14.860 I wanted to talk

00:31:15.680 about today.

00:31:22.300 I think there

00:31:23.160 were, what was

00:31:24.460 it, 64 people

00:31:25.900 died in Hurricane

00:31:27.020 Ida so far?

00:31:28.800 Isn't that more

00:31:29.400 than you expected?

00:31:31.220 I think that was

00:31:32.120 the number, 60

00:31:33.160 something.

00:31:34.180 And that's way

00:31:35.180 more than I

00:31:35.660 thought.

00:31:35.960 I thought the

00:31:36.340 number was going

00:31:37.060 to be closer to

00:31:38.260 two to four.

00:31:40.820 Because the

00:31:41.920 didn't we have

00:31:42.560 a lot of

00:31:43.100 warning?

00:31:44.360 I feel like we

00:31:45.020 had tons of

00:31:45.640 warning.

00:31:47.060 So, there's

00:31:48.400 something wrong

00:31:49.020 with our ability

00:31:49.780 to evacuate if

00:31:51.080 people are dying

00:31:52.080 when we know

00:31:52.860 trouble's coming.

00:31:55.240 New York was

00:31:56.120 unprepared.

00:31:57.240 Yeah, that's

00:31:57.680 true.

00:31:57.920 I guess there

00:31:58.320 were some

00:31:58.960 floodings that

00:32:00.560 were hard to

00:32:02.600 predict.

00:32:05.660 All right.

00:32:07.980 Would you like

00:32:08.840 to drum for

00:32:09.380 the Rolling

00:32:09.760 Stones?

00:32:11.300 Yeah.

00:32:11.920 You know,

00:32:12.760 true story,

00:32:13.840 my drum

00:32:14.540 teacher and

00:32:15.840 I had

00:32:16.260 decided that

00:32:17.100 Charlie Watts,

00:32:19.020 the now

00:32:19.600 deceased drummer

00:32:20.320 for the Stones,

00:32:20.940 was going to

00:32:21.260 be sort of

00:32:21.680 my role

00:32:22.260 model because

00:32:23.360 he'd be

00:32:23.680 relatively easy

00:32:25.340 to imitate

00:32:26.100 and that

00:32:26.560 would get

00:32:26.840 you started.

00:32:27.840 And then he

00:32:28.140 dies.

00:32:29.200 As soon as I

00:32:29.960 pick him as

00:32:30.840 my role

00:32:31.240 model, he

00:32:31.680 dies.

00:32:32.420 read the

00:32:41.540 fact

00:32:41.860 inconvenient

00:32:42.540 facts.

00:32:43.560 All right.

00:32:47.760 Please don't

00:32:48.460 choose any more

00:32:49.060 role models.

00:32:49.640 What am I

00:32:56.380 going to do

00:32:56.800 an e-bike

00:32:57.480 live stream?

00:32:59.660 Yeah, you

00:33:00.120 know, maybe I

00:33:00.920 should just

00:33:01.280 tape my

00:33:02.160 phone to my

00:33:02.720 e-bike and

00:33:03.260 go for a

00:33:03.660 ride.

00:33:04.200 Would you

00:33:04.480 like that?

00:33:05.440 I've been

00:33:05.900 waiting for

00:33:06.380 the smoke

00:33:08.560 to go down

00:33:09.440 because I

00:33:09.800 can't really

00:33:10.280 exercise outside.

00:33:12.640 Oh, should I

00:33:13.120 paint my

00:33:13.480 nail?

00:33:14.880 People are

00:33:15.420 saying that my

00:33:15.980 bruise on my

00:33:16.780 fingernail is

00:33:17.520 distracting.

00:33:18.080 I should just

00:33:18.720 paint my

00:33:19.080 nails.

00:33:20.300 That does

00:33:20.940 look pretty

00:33:21.320 ugly.

00:33:21.900 It lasts a

00:33:22.440 year.

00:33:23.380 It'll take a

00:33:23.860 year for those

00:33:24.680 bruises to

00:33:25.300 grow out.

00:33:27.700 Do I

00:33:28.000 pedal?

00:33:28.420 Yes.

00:33:29.800 In California,

00:33:30.940 you have to

00:33:31.400 pedal an

00:33:31.980 e-bike so

00:33:33.500 that it's just

00:33:34.140 an assisted

00:33:34.740 bicycle.

00:33:35.420 Otherwise,

00:33:35.780 it's a

00:33:36.040 motorcycle.

00:33:37.040 And then you

00:33:37.400 have to

00:33:37.640 license it.

00:33:39.200 How is

00:33:39.560 Boo?

00:33:41.900 I don't

00:33:42.860 know.

00:33:44.180 I mean,

00:33:44.540 she seems

00:33:45.120 happy, but

00:33:45.800 she's different,

00:33:46.720 definitely.

00:33:48.280 Plans for

00:33:48.720 a new

00:33:48.940 book, just

00:33:51.500 some thoughts

00:33:52.240 about it.

00:33:52.640 I don't

00:33:52.800 have plans

00:33:53.280 yet.

00:33:55.920 All right.

00:33:56.600 That's all I

00:33:57.000 got for now,

00:33:57.520 and I will

00:33:58.040 see you later

00:33:59.040 on YouTube.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - September 06, 2021

Episode 1491 Scott Adams： Biden Regret Syndrome (BRS) is Sweeping the Country. Find Out How Bad it is

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript