Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1491 Scott Adams： Biden Regret Syndrome (BRS) is Sweeping the Country. Find Out How Bad it is

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and it's time, once again, for the best thing that's ever happened

00:00:08.400 in the history of the universe.

00:00:09.900 It's called coffee with Scott Adams.

00:00:12.360 And it features a very special thing called the simultaneous sip.

00:00:15.680 Some people love it.

00:00:16.560 Some people hate it.

00:00:17.660 But eventually, you'll all love it.

00:00:20.780 You just haven't tried it yet.

00:00:22.100 So, all you need to enjoy this simultaneous sip is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice or stye in a canteen jug or a flask,

00:00:32.880 a vessel of any kind, fill it with your favorite liquid, and I like coffee.

00:00:38.680 Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better.

00:00:45.360 It's called the simultaneous sip, and it's going to happen now.

00:00:48.940 Go.

00:00:52.100 Well, my goal is to make sure that you learn something each and every time you join me here on Coffee with Scott Adams.

00:01:03.600 And we'll see if that happens again today.

00:01:06.520 Speaking of anecdotal persuasion, why is it that the news tells us we should use data and science to make decisions?

00:01:16.040 Are you with me so far?

00:01:17.420 When you say this, CNN, MSNBC, it's one of their main themes is to use science and data, right?

00:01:27.740 What is their other major theme besides you should use science and data?

00:01:34.140 Their other major theme is look at this anecdotal story and draw a conclusion.

00:01:39.300 That's the opposite, isn't it?

00:01:44.380 So make up your mind, mainstream media.

00:01:47.300 Either we should use data and science and logic, which sounds good to me,

00:01:52.860 or you can feed us continuous stories about that one time that one person had that experience,

00:02:00.640 and we'll make our decisions based on that, because you know we will.

00:02:03.720 Well, do you know why you know that the anecdotes will influence us more than the data?

00:02:09.580 How do you know that?

00:02:11.640 Hmm.

00:02:13.180 Science.

00:02:14.400 Yeah.

00:02:15.120 Science can pretty much guarantee that the anecdotes are going to be more persuasive than the data.

00:02:22.520 And yet, while claiming that data is important,

00:02:25.700 they work as hard as they can to make you ignore it with their anecdotes.

00:02:29.240 Here's another one.

00:02:31.980 This one, I forget which news source I got this from, but it doesn't matter.

00:02:38.240 It says that Mississippi's latest COVID surge sees four unvaccinated pregnant women die of a virus in a week

00:02:45.840 in America's least inoculated state.

00:02:51.420 Four unvaccinated pregnant women.

00:02:53.660 They're really taking the anecdotal persuasion up to a 10,

00:02:58.960 because it's bad enough that somebody dies,

00:03:01.320 but when you throw in the unvaccinated and then pregnant and then woman,

00:03:06.540 they're really going deep now for the serious anecdotal persuasion.

00:03:11.440 Well, Rasmussen had a poll

00:03:12.660 and asked people what they thought about rescuing Americans left in Afghanistan,

00:03:18.800 should we need to do that?

00:03:19.920 And 69% of likely voters say the U.S. should use military force

00:03:26.240 to rescue Americans left in Afghanistan.

00:03:28.920 So that's a super majority.

00:03:32.400 How would you like to be the Taliban 0.98

00:03:34.200 and know that even though the war just ended,

00:03:37.580 a super majority of American citizens

00:03:39.840 are willing to turn Afghanistan into glass 0.99

00:03:44.760 to get our 100 Americans back?

00:03:47.420 It should give you pause.

00:03:51.000 Because if you were to ask also,

00:03:52.880 how much would you be willing to spend

00:03:54.760 to make a military action to get our hostages back?

00:03:59.720 I would say, I'd say the wallet is open, right?

00:04:04.580 So Afghanistan, if you're worried that we're not willing to spend

00:04:08.080 to send some military back there to get them out,

00:04:12.340 you should think about that twice,

00:04:14.340 because we are willing to spend whatever it takes to get them back.

00:04:18.120 If it makes a difference.

00:04:19.240 I don't know if a military operation could possibly work.

00:04:25.140 Only 52% of liberals think we should use military force

00:04:30.820 to rescue Americans if it comes to that.

00:04:33.660 Now, I ask you this.

00:04:35.280 Is this another example of liberals not understanding

00:04:40.080 how human motivation influences systems?

00:04:43.980 Because that seems to be the biggest problem on the left.

00:04:49.000 Consistent.

00:04:49.820 And it influences all their topics.

00:04:52.560 It imagines that you could build a system

00:04:54.720 where people just have good faith

00:04:57.620 and they just operate according to what's good for the whole

00:05:00.500 instead of what's good for themselves.

00:05:02.480 But, of course, nobody operates that way.

00:05:05.120 People operate for themselves.

00:05:07.160 So, once again, liberals don't understand

00:05:10.200 that if you're not at least willing

00:05:11.900 to send a very big-ass military operation back into Afghanistan,

00:05:16.740 if you're not at least willing to do it,

00:05:19.820 you're not going to get any hostages back

00:05:22.140 unless you pay for them or something else.

00:05:24.660 So, once again, liberals don't understand human motivation.

00:05:30.540 Or at least they don't incorporate it

00:05:32.140 in the same way that Republicans do.

00:05:34.400 Or the right does.

00:05:36.480 There's an Emerson poll

00:05:37.800 that says that if Biden and Trump ran right now,

00:05:43.140 Trump would win.

00:05:45.280 If Biden and Trump had a rematch today,

00:05:49.000 Trump would win.

00:05:50.080 Just barely.

00:05:52.260 47% to 46%.

00:05:53.660 And among Democrats,

00:05:56.680 60% of voters said

00:05:58.440 they would like to see Biden

00:05:59.720 as the presidential nominee.

00:06:03.220 What?

00:06:04.940 60% of Democrats

00:06:07.180 are pretty happy with what they got.

00:06:10.960 Really?

00:06:12.180 You can't find one Democrat

00:06:13.800 who might have similar capabilities

00:06:16.420 but had all of his mental faculties

00:06:19.300 and he wasn't 100 years old.

00:06:21.600 Nobody?

00:06:21.920 Nobody in the whole Democrat Party

00:06:24.580 could do better than Joe Biden?

00:06:27.300 So 60% of people say,

00:06:28.820 yeah, let's go with that again.

00:06:31.920 Okay.

00:06:32.600 Now, to be fair,

00:06:33.740 if the situation were reversed,

00:06:35.940 if Trump were in office,

00:06:37.840 probably the poll would look opposite.

00:06:40.340 Because whoever's in office

00:06:41.360 is going to look worse, right?

00:06:43.800 Being in office

00:06:44.860 makes you subject to more criticism.

00:06:46.920 So I think whoever's in office

00:06:49.700 is going to look degraded

00:06:51.280 compared to whoever is just an idea

00:06:53.780 in your head.

00:06:57.740 Now, what other polls do we have?

00:07:00.460 Hmm.

00:07:01.180 I think there's another one coming up here, too.

00:07:05.300 Let's talk about Ron DeSantis.

00:07:07.460 You know, he set up all these

00:07:08.900 Regeneron treatment centers.

00:07:11.160 So you can go in

00:07:12.880 if you've got some symptoms

00:07:14.240 and you've got a diagnosis of COVID,

00:07:18.000 you can go in and get the drip.

00:07:20.180 They'll hook you right up to the Regeneron

00:07:22.020 and get it to you early.

00:07:23.920 And there's, of course,

00:07:25.160 anecdotal,

00:07:26.000 anecdotal report

00:07:27.820 of this guy,

00:07:28.940 Britt Noel,

00:07:29.760 who said that he was feeling bad

00:07:32.540 with the COVID,

00:07:33.300 but they put him on the drip

00:07:34.580 and he immediately felt better.

00:07:36.820 Now, that's not the first time

00:07:38.000 I've heard that.

00:07:39.360 I won't tell somebody else's story,

00:07:41.780 but I did hear somebody else say

00:07:43.420 that nothing worked until the drip.

00:07:47.320 And as soon as you got out of the drip,

00:07:49.200 you just felt better.

00:07:51.000 Just like immediately you felt better.

00:07:53.900 So let's combine two things.

00:07:59.780 Let's say that the Regeneron,

00:08:01.700 according to science,

00:08:03.180 as well as anecdote,

00:08:04.840 don't you like it

00:08:05.540 when science and anecdote agree?

00:08:08.580 Because here's a case.

00:08:10.620 Anecdotally,

00:08:11.120 we hear that Regeneron works,

00:08:12.460 but scientifically,

00:08:13.340 it seems to work as well.

00:08:15.540 If we have enough of it,

00:08:16.740 I think the problem

00:08:17.560 might be supply, actually.

00:08:20.000 But here's my question.

00:08:21.940 You know,

00:08:22.220 Michael Mina has been talking

00:08:23.520 for over a year,

00:08:24.680 I guess,

00:08:25.520 a year and a half,

00:08:26.280 I think,

00:08:26.660 about we should be doing rapid tests,

00:08:29.820 which are not as accurate

00:08:31.220 as the ones you could get

00:08:32.700 at your doctor's office.

00:08:34.640 But they're, you know,

00:08:35.980 90% accurate.

00:08:36.820 So suppose everybody

00:08:38.500 had a cheap rapid test

00:08:39.920 and also access to Regeneron

00:08:43.000 on demand.

00:08:44.740 As soon as they got symptoms,

00:08:46.360 boom,

00:08:46.760 just go get your Regeneron.

00:08:48.400 What would happen

00:08:49.440 if we could catch

00:08:50.600 nine out of ten infections

00:08:52.620 earlier than they normally

00:08:53.880 would have been caught,

00:08:55.460 and all nine of those ten people

00:08:57.140 go get Regeneron right away?

00:08:59.680 I feel like we're done.

00:09:03.600 Don't you?

00:09:04.860 I feel like that would be,

00:09:06.400 that's the end of the pandemic.

00:09:08.640 Nine out of ten catching it early,

00:09:10.920 if in the hypothetical situation,

00:09:12.860 which we don't have now,

00:09:14.280 where you have cheap,

00:09:15.620 ubiquitous testing

00:09:16.660 and everybody's just testing

00:09:17.720 all the time.

00:09:18.640 If you got nine out of ten people,

00:09:21.540 but you missed that tenth one,

00:09:23.600 which is the one

00:09:24.580 you're going to miss,

00:09:25.760 probably?

00:09:26.940 You're probably going to miss

00:09:27.940 the one that didn't have

00:09:28.820 many symptoms.

00:09:30.620 So if the nine out of ten

00:09:31.980 are, on average,

00:09:33.140 the ones who have most symptoms,

00:09:34.640 they're probably the ones

00:09:35.580 with the big viral load,

00:09:37.180 probably the ones

00:09:38.120 who are going to be

00:09:38.660 coughing all over you.

00:09:40.020 I feel like if you got

00:09:41.100 nine out of ten,

00:09:42.860 it's closer to ten out of ten

00:09:44.400 than you think,

00:09:45.760 because that one

00:09:46.400 that they don't get,

00:09:48.140 I'm guessing that the reason

00:09:49.640 they wouldn't get them

00:09:50.420 is because their viral load

00:09:52.420 would be too low.

00:09:53.540 Can somebody give me

00:09:54.140 a fact check on that?

00:09:54.980 Are the tests

00:09:56.420 somewhat inaccurate

00:09:59.580 only based on how much

00:10:02.160 viral stuff there is,

00:10:03.500 or is there another

00:10:04.140 source of inaccuracy

00:10:05.240 besides the operator?

00:10:09.300 So, Michael Mina

00:10:10.520 is pointing out once again

00:10:11.660 that we have not treated

00:10:12.940 the rapid testing

00:10:14.580 the right way,

00:10:15.660 because I guess we treat it

00:10:17.160 as a medical decision,

00:10:20.420 and therefore it goes

00:10:21.300 through some approval process,

00:10:22.760 and therefore we can't

00:10:23.580 have nice things

00:10:24.260 in this country.

00:10:24.980 So, other countries

00:10:26.360 have these rapid tests

00:10:27.580 available,

00:10:28.380 but if you do

00:10:30.080 what Florida has done,

00:10:32.320 which is set up

00:10:32.960 these Regeneron sites

00:10:34.720 where it's easy

00:10:35.520 to just go get the drip,

00:10:38.320 and then on top of that

00:10:39.840 you do the Michael Mina

00:10:41.040 cheap but not perfectly

00:10:43.480 accurate testing,

00:10:44.160 testing,

00:10:44.660 I feel like you're done.

00:10:47.160 Honestly, that feels

00:10:48.600 pretty close to done

00:10:49.840 with the pandemic.

00:10:51.420 It turns it into endemic,

00:10:53.020 where it's just always here

00:10:54.080 but doesn't kill you.

00:10:57.800 Talk about your two movies

00:11:00.100 on one screen.

00:11:02.260 I'm going to read you

00:11:03.440 something from a source

00:11:05.660 that I think is credible,

00:11:07.000 but only credible

00:11:09.160 for this topic.

00:11:10.220 All right?

00:11:10.880 Not credible in general,

00:11:12.640 but just specific

00:11:13.720 to the specific point

00:11:15.300 I'm going to make

00:11:15.820 is credible

00:11:16.380 and is completely

00:11:18.300 opposite of everything

00:11:19.600 I believe to be true.

00:11:21.860 So, here's the fun part.

00:11:24.200 Is this my blind spot?

00:11:27.460 Because some of you

00:11:28.440 are going to have

00:11:28.820 the same experience

00:11:29.700 in a moment

00:11:30.180 when I tell you

00:11:30.740 what the topic is.

00:11:31.860 You're going to say to yourself,

00:11:33.060 wait a minute,

00:11:34.140 that's literally

00:11:34.940 100% opposite

00:11:36.320 of everything

00:11:37.020 I think to be true.

00:11:38.800 But it comes from

00:11:39.720 a strong source.

00:11:41.440 I don't know

00:11:41.840 what to do with this.

00:11:43.140 So, here's the situation.

00:11:45.180 Dr. Pierre Corey,

00:11:47.360 K-R-R-Y, 1.00

00:11:48.680 you've heard of him

00:11:49.380 because he's provocative

00:11:50.860 and he's been saying

00:11:51.680 things that are opposite

00:11:52.980 of mainstream

00:11:54.140 medical opinion.

00:11:57.140 And specifically

00:11:57.780 on the I-word.

00:12:00.340 I'm not going to say it

00:12:02.820 because I'll get banned.

00:12:04.700 So, he's a pro-

00:12:06.240 Ivermectin.

00:12:07.660 Okay, I'll just say

00:12:08.400 Ivermectin guy.

00:12:09.980 And here's what he says

00:12:11.180 about the evidence

00:12:12.060 for Ivermectin,

00:12:13.460 which I believe

00:12:14.780 is literally

00:12:15.780 the opposite of true

00:12:17.160 and still believe it.

00:12:19.480 But at the same time,

00:12:21.040 I don't see how

00:12:22.280 he could be wrong

00:12:23.000 about this

00:12:23.540 because it's his field

00:12:24.520 and he's looked into it

00:12:26.560 and he has a deep interest.

00:12:29.200 So, let me tell you

00:12:30.160 what he says.

00:12:31.400 He says that

00:12:32.660 Ivermectin evidence

00:12:33.820 has 31 randomized

00:12:36.540 controlled trials

00:12:37.940 and 32 observational

00:12:40.960 controlled trials,

00:12:42.800 including 26,000 patients

00:12:44.980 and finds,

00:12:45.720 according to him,

00:12:46.620 and this is opposite

00:12:47.940 of mainstream medicine,

00:12:49.460 but he says this,

00:12:50.800 finds large statistically

00:12:52.800 significant reductions

00:12:54.220 in mortality hospitalizations,

00:12:56.380 time to recover

00:12:57.280 and viral clearance.

00:12:58.360 He says the IDSA,

00:13:00.480 which is the

00:13:00.860 Infectious Disease

00:13:01.680 Society of America,

00:13:03.300 won't or can't

00:13:04.840 recommend it

00:13:06.120 because they're captured

00:13:07.020 by research dollars

00:13:08.920 from the NIH.

00:13:10.500 Now,

00:13:11.660 how could my understanding

00:13:13.520 be so opposite?

00:13:16.340 My understanding

00:13:17.100 is that there might be

00:13:18.160 one or two

00:13:19.900 randomized controlled trials

00:13:21.640 and that one of them

00:13:23.320 has been debunked

00:13:24.340 as garbage.

00:13:25.260 That's my understanding.

00:13:28.480 I don't think it's true,

00:13:30.640 but that's my understanding,

00:13:33.640 just maybe two

00:13:34.800 randomized controlled trials.

00:13:36.260 And he's saying

00:13:36.820 there are 31 of them.

00:13:39.080 Could that possibly be true,

00:13:41.420 that there are 31

00:13:42.800 randomized controlled trials

00:13:44.700 for COVID?

00:13:46.500 Yeah,

00:13:49.560 I know you're saying

00:13:50.180 overseas,

00:13:51.160 but I don't feel like it.

00:13:54.060 So,

00:13:54.480 yeah,

00:13:54.720 and then 32

00:13:55.500 that are observational.

00:13:59.640 So,

00:14:00.300 Brett

00:14:00.600 Weinstein

00:14:03.060 has been saying

00:14:03.620 the same thing.

00:14:05.000 Why is it that

00:14:05.800 we don't even know this?

00:14:08.400 How could we think

00:14:09.660 there might be

00:14:10.180 one or two

00:14:10.920 and one of them

00:14:12.040 is clearly debunked

00:14:13.300 and then people

00:14:14.580 who clearly know

00:14:15.620 what they're talking about

00:14:16.480 say there are 31?

00:14:18.740 What the hell is going on?

00:14:20.400 I don't even have

00:14:21.240 an opinion.

00:14:22.500 I don't know which it is.

00:14:23.460 Is it two

00:14:24.140 and one of them

00:14:25.680 is bullshit

00:14:26.100 or is it 31

00:14:28.220 and they're pretty good?

00:14:29.940 What the hell

00:14:30.680 is going on?

00:14:32.160 I have no idea here.

00:14:33.820 This is

00:14:34.140 completely baffling.

00:14:35.640 No idea.

00:14:38.200 All right,

00:14:38.740 here's something

00:14:39.200 to scare you.

00:14:41.060 TikTok

00:14:41.500 has overtaken

00:14:42.640 YouTube

00:14:43.060 for most minutes

00:14:44.320 watched.

00:14:45.620 Did you hear that?

00:14:49.100 TikTok

00:14:49.420 just overtook

00:14:50.940 YouTube

00:14:51.460 for most minutes

00:14:53.500 watched

00:14:54.020 and TikTok

00:14:55.340 is a Chinese

00:14:57.040 brainwashing app.

00:14:59.460 Now,

00:14:59.920 they don't say that.

00:15:01.440 That's my

00:15:01.940 allegation.

00:15:03.680 And there are

00:15:04.500 some assumptions

00:15:05.040 and speculation

00:15:05.680 built into this

00:15:06.480 allegation.

00:15:07.500 So when you

00:15:08.120 sue me,

00:15:08.560 TikTok,

00:15:09.580 I'm going to

00:15:10.100 back up and say,

00:15:10.900 whoa,

00:15:11.180 I didn't say it was true.

00:15:12.740 I said it looks

00:15:13.300 like it's true.

00:15:14.740 Sure looks like it.

00:15:16.060 That's all I know.

00:15:17.360 I just know

00:15:18.180 it looks that way.

00:15:20.320 And

00:15:20.720 the interesting

00:15:23.500 thing is the

00:15:24.220 content on TikTok.

00:15:26.360 I would like to

00:15:27.160 give you my

00:15:27.900 impression

00:15:28.340 of everybody

00:15:30.040 on TikTok.

00:15:30.820 Can you handle it?

00:15:33.360 My impression

00:15:34.300 of every video

00:15:36.220 on TikTok.

00:15:37.060 Now,

00:15:37.780 I'm not very good

00:15:38.960 at dancing,

00:15:39.860 so you'll have to

00:15:41.080 look past my

00:15:41.780 dance moves.

00:15:43.100 I want you

00:15:43.580 to concentrate

00:15:44.180 just on my

00:15:45.000 impression

00:15:45.380 of the

00:15:46.020 facial part.

00:15:48.440 So I think

00:15:48.940 from,

00:15:49.300 you know,

00:15:49.760 chin to head,

00:15:50.800 I'm going to

00:15:51.200 be nailing

00:15:51.700 this impression.

00:15:53.120 The rest

00:15:53.820 of my body,

00:15:54.580 well,

00:15:54.920 not so good.

00:15:57.000 But let me

00:15:58.340 see if I can

00:15:58.860 get into the

00:15:59.460 mood for

00:16:01.240 your first

00:16:02.060 every single

00:16:03.460 TikTok

00:16:03.860 video

00:16:05.420 that you've

00:16:06.380 seen.

00:16:06.620 and

00:16:21.580 seen.

00:16:25.980 Now,

00:16:26.500 my understanding

00:16:27.180 is that in

00:16:28.920 order to make

00:16:29.480 a perfect

00:16:30.340 TikTok

00:16:31.240 dance video,

00:16:32.880 you've got to

00:16:34.080 have many

00:16:34.440 elements.

00:16:35.180 One of the

00:16:35.540 elements you

00:16:36.020 should have

00:16:36.520 is an

00:16:36.860 attractive

00:16:37.240 person,

00:16:38.280 male or

00:16:38.760 female,

00:16:40.000 ideally younger,

00:16:41.780 but attractive.

00:16:43.340 That attractive

00:16:44.240 person should

00:16:45.000 have some

00:16:45.480 dance moves.

00:16:46.480 That makes

00:16:47.060 it a little

00:16:47.400 bit more

00:16:47.780 viral.

00:16:48.320 You know,

00:16:48.500 can move

00:16:49.060 pretty good.

00:16:50.320 But on top

00:16:51.060 of that,

00:16:52.000 they have to

00:16:52.440 do something

00:16:53.000 with the

00:16:53.500 face that

00:16:55.720 makes you

00:16:56.160 want to

00:16:56.520 punch them

00:16:57.140 with a

00:16:58.320 brick.

00:16:59.940 Now,

00:17:00.440 don't do

00:17:00.780 that.

00:17:01.300 I'm very

00:17:01.800 much opposed

00:17:02.480 to violence.

00:17:04.120 But you

00:17:05.140 can't really

00:17:05.660 watch a

00:17:06.140 TikTok

00:17:06.440 video without

00:17:08.180 wanting to

00:17:08.900 smash the

00:17:09.680 people in

00:17:10.120 them with

00:17:10.540 bricks.

00:17:12.040 Am I the

00:17:12.720 only one

00:17:13.000 who thinks

00:17:13.300 that?

00:17:15.720 It's not

00:17:16.300 just me.

00:17:18.080 Come on.

00:17:20.900 Come on.

00:17:21.580 It's not

00:17:21.900 just me.

00:17:23.680 Yeah,

00:17:24.180 you want to

00:17:24.600 kill all of

00:17:25.180 them with a

00:17:25.580 brick.

00:17:26.500 You do.

00:17:27.220 You just

00:17:28.520 want to

00:17:28.780 murder them. 0.63

00:17:30.260 Now,

00:17:30.900 I assume

00:17:32.560 that this

00:17:33.000 is what

00:17:33.480 China's 0.76

00:17:34.540 master

00:17:34.880 plan is.

00:17:36.680 I think

00:17:37.260 the

00:17:37.420 master

00:17:37.700 plan

00:17:38.080 is to

00:17:38.500 make us

00:17:38.900 hate each

00:17:39.580 other with

00:17:40.020 such a

00:17:40.440 passion

00:17:40.800 because

00:17:42.160 that face

00:17:44.160 you've got

00:17:44.540 to hit

00:17:44.700 with a

00:17:44.980 brick.

00:17:46.900 I mean,

00:17:47.380 you really

00:17:47.680 just have

00:17:48.060 to hit

00:17:48.260 that with

00:17:48.540 a brick.

00:17:49.360 Don't do

00:17:49.880 that,

00:17:50.320 though.

00:17:50.660 It's

00:17:50.840 violent.

00:17:52.920 Have you

00:17:53.400 seen the

00:17:53.680 video of

00:17:54.200 Obama?

00:17:55.140 I think

00:17:55.760 it's a

00:17:56.080 real video.

00:17:57.320 But,

00:17:57.580 you know,

00:17:57.720 you have

00:17:57.960 all these

00:17:58.320 deepfake

00:17:58.960 videos of

00:18:00.360 Obama,

00:18:01.440 but it

00:18:01.860 looked real.

00:18:02.920 So if

00:18:03.220 somebody can

00:18:03.740 fact-check

00:18:04.280 me on

00:18:04.620 this,

00:18:05.200 apparently he

00:18:05.920 was talking

00:18:06.340 to Colbert

00:18:07.140 about a

00:18:08.420 hypothetical

00:18:09.300 third term,

00:18:11.140 and he

00:18:11.400 said if he

00:18:11.880 could just

00:18:12.300 be behind

00:18:12.840 the scenes

00:18:13.460 sort of as

00:18:14.540 a puppet

00:18:15.040 master and

00:18:16.380 tell other

00:18:16.940 people what

00:18:17.420 to say,

00:18:18.580 but he

00:18:18.880 didn't have

00:18:19.260 to be

00:18:19.500 president,

00:18:20.400 you know,

00:18:20.540 he could

00:18:20.760 just have

00:18:21.120 somebody as

00:18:21.640 a front

00:18:22.360 for him

00:18:22.860 and his

00:18:23.400 opinions,

00:18:25.000 that that

00:18:25.820 would be his

00:18:26.240 ideal situation

00:18:27.120 for a third

00:18:28.040 term.

00:18:28.960 Now,

00:18:33.940 I hear

00:18:34.740 people saying

00:18:35.280 that it

00:18:36.480 looks like

00:18:36.840 a real

00:18:37.220 clip.

00:18:38.320 Now,

00:18:38.480 I think

00:18:38.680 he was

00:18:39.060 somewhat

00:18:40.180 joking,

00:18:42.060 but maybe

00:18:42.800 not so

00:18:43.340 much,

00:18:44.080 because it

00:18:45.540 does look

00:18:46.220 like he

00:18:46.720 might be

00:18:47.120 behind the

00:18:47.600 scenes

00:18:47.860 pulling some

00:18:48.500 strings.

00:18:49.580 Now,

00:18:49.860 I don't

00:18:50.040 think he's

00:18:50.440 going to

00:18:50.660 admit it

00:18:51.080 after

00:18:51.380 Afghanistan,

00:18:52.680 but maybe.

00:18:53.980 Now,

00:18:54.400 let's talk

00:18:54.740 about

00:18:55.080 BRS.

00:18:57.140 Have you

00:18:57.440 heard of

00:18:57.660 BRS?

00:18:58.260 It's a

00:18:59.140 medical

00:18:59.440 condition.

00:19:01.180 It's

00:19:01.780 sort of

00:19:02.240 sweeping the 0.57

00:19:02.800 country.

00:19:04.040 And it

00:19:04.240 stands for

00:19:04.680 Biden

00:19:05.040 Regret

00:19:05.620 Syndrome,

00:19:06.560 BRS.

00:19:07.880 And there

00:19:09.580 was a

00:19:09.840 poll by,

00:19:10.740 let's

00:19:11.240 see,

00:19:11.860 somebody,

00:19:16.240 that says

00:19:17.000 one-fifth of

00:19:17.820 voters who

00:19:18.500 voted for

00:19:20.200 Biden now

00:19:21.980 want their

00:19:22.380 vote back.

00:19:22.960 vote.

00:19:24.940 What?

00:19:25.980 One-fifth of

00:19:27.440 the people

00:19:27.880 who voted

00:19:28.400 for Biden

00:19:29.100 wish they

00:19:30.420 could change

00:19:30.900 their vote

00:19:31.280 now.

00:19:32.620 One-fifth.

00:19:34.960 Do you

00:19:35.620 know how

00:19:36.100 not close

00:19:36.880 an election

00:19:37.400 would be

00:19:37.920 if one-fifth

00:19:38.780 of the people

00:19:39.240 really did

00:19:39.760 change their

00:19:40.240 vote from

00:19:40.640 Biden?

00:19:41.440 Wouldn't

00:19:41.700 be close.

00:19:43.220 It would

00:19:43.480 be the

00:19:43.720 biggest

00:19:43.940 landslide

00:19:44.500 of any

00:19:44.880 election,

00:19:45.320 probably.

00:19:46.340 Now,

00:19:46.780 I don't

00:19:47.000 know how

00:19:47.300 much to

00:19:47.660 believe that

00:19:48.240 about this

00:19:49.360 20%.

00:19:50.280 It sounds

00:19:50.660 high,

00:19:51.480 especially

00:19:51.920 when there

00:19:52.320 was the

00:19:52.700 other poll

00:19:53.220 I mentioned

00:19:53.680 that showed

00:19:54.120 that they're

00:19:54.440 running neck

00:19:54.940 and neck.

00:19:55.860 So I'm

00:19:56.500 not sure I

00:19:56.880 believe both

00:19:57.380 of those

00:19:57.680 polls.

00:19:58.480 I think

00:19:58.800 you have

00:19:58.980 to pick

00:19:59.260 one because

00:19:59.760 they seem

00:20:00.100 a little

00:20:00.320 bit

00:20:00.600 conflicty.

00:20:03.000 So it

00:20:03.860 was Zogby

00:20:04.380 that found

00:20:04.860 that 20%

00:20:05.980 of Biden

00:20:07.380 voters have

00:20:07.920 some regret.

00:20:10.280 But nearly

00:20:12.780 three in

00:20:13.440 10 or

00:20:14.440 29% of

00:20:15.560 Republicans

00:20:16.120 who voted

00:20:16.700 for Biden

00:20:17.300 regretted it.

00:20:19.300 Well,

00:20:19.820 only 20%

00:20:20.620 of Democrats

00:20:21.340 regretted it.

00:20:22.860 And only

00:20:23.120 14% of

00:20:23.920 independents.

00:20:25.420 So independents 0.58

00:20:26.340 seem pretty

00:20:27.740 happy with

00:20:28.240 their vote.

00:20:29.280 So the

00:20:29.580 independents

00:20:30.180 who voted

00:20:30.580 for Biden

00:20:31.480 are like,

00:20:32.340 yeah,

00:20:32.620 I think

00:20:32.920 we nailed

00:20:33.300 it.

00:20:34.040 I think

00:20:34.400 he's doing

00:20:34.780 a fine

00:20:35.320 job.

00:20:36.660 Well,

00:20:37.180 here's the

00:20:37.520 funny part.

00:20:39.480 Vice

00:20:39.800 President

00:20:40.200 Harris

00:20:41.160 is going

00:20:41.720 to campaign

00:20:43.120 with Gavin

00:20:44.080 Newsom in

00:20:44.620 California

00:20:45.060 to try

00:20:45.660 to get

00:20:46.140 him to

00:20:46.820 prevail

00:20:48.180 against

00:20:48.860 the recall

00:20:49.580 and I

00:20:50.700 wonder how

00:20:51.160 that

00:20:51.400 conversation

00:20:52.100 went.

00:20:53.720 Hmm.

00:20:55.280 Imagine

00:20:55.760 little

00:20:56.420 noise

00:20:56.960 that is

00:20:57.840 the noise

00:20:58.780 that indicates

00:20:59.420 I'm thinking

00:21:00.160 or imagining

00:21:01.340 the scene.

00:21:02.640 Ding,

00:21:02.820 ding,

00:21:03.100 ding,

00:21:03.240 ding.

00:21:04.720 Imagine

00:21:05.280 the White

00:21:08.560 House

00:21:08.880 contacts

00:21:10.280 Gavin Newsom

00:21:11.060 and says,

00:21:12.280 hey,

00:21:12.500 Gavin Newsom,

00:21:13.180 we want to

00:21:13.660 make sure

00:21:14.120 that you

00:21:14.680 win and

00:21:15.200 you recall.

00:21:15.600 we'd

00:21:17.000 like to

00:21:17.240 have

00:21:17.420 President

00:21:17.840 Biden

00:21:18.280 come out

00:21:19.480 and maybe

00:21:20.260 campaign

00:21:20.660 with you

00:21:21.100 and give

00:21:21.380 you a 0.57

00:21:21.660 boost.

00:21:22.940 And you

00:21:23.160 can see

00:21:23.520 Newsom

00:21:23.860 on the

00:21:24.140 phone.

00:21:26.400 That is

00:21:27.180 very

00:21:27.720 generous

00:21:28.200 of you.

00:21:29.780 Very

00:21:30.300 generous

00:21:30.800 to send

00:21:31.380 Joe Biden

00:21:32.080 right after

00:21:32.640 the Afghanistan

00:21:33.400 debacle

00:21:34.220 so that I

00:21:35.840 will be

00:21:36.460 thought of

00:21:37.780 in the

00:21:38.060 same vein

00:21:38.760 as the

00:21:39.420 most

00:21:39.620 incompetent

00:21:40.280 president

00:21:40.640 of all

00:21:41.200 time.

00:21:42.280 No

00:21:42.580 thank

00:21:42.860 you.

00:21:44.260 And

00:21:44.460 then the

00:21:44.720 White

00:21:44.860 House

00:21:45.040 says,

00:21:45.540 okay,

00:21:45.880 okay,

00:21:46.100 we get

00:21:46.460 it,

00:21:46.780 it's a

00:21:47.220 bad

00:21:47.380 time.

00:21:48.540 But we

00:21:49.140 got a

00:21:49.360 backup

00:21:49.620 plan.

00:21:50.660 We have

00:21:50.920 a backup

00:21:51.280 plan.

00:21:52.700 And

00:21:52.940 Gavin

00:21:53.200 Newsom

00:21:53.540 says,

00:21:54.020 thank

00:21:55.060 goodness,

00:21:56.300 I don't

00:21:56.660 need to

00:21:57.360 hear the

00:21:57.660 details,

00:21:58.700 but please

00:21:59.420 don't do

00:22:01.660 my campaign

00:22:02.600 by sending

00:22:03.660 me Joe

00:22:04.160 Biden.

00:22:06.000 I mean,

00:22:06.360 nobody's

00:22:06.700 going to

00:22:06.940 give me

00:22:07.240 an extra

00:22:07.600 vote because

00:22:08.140 Joe Biden,

00:22:08.840 the architect

00:22:10.260 of the

00:22:10.920 Afghan

00:22:11.400 disaster,

00:22:12.580 don't want

00:22:13.200 that,

00:22:14.120 so just

00:22:14.540 send somebody

00:22:15.420 good.

00:22:17.920 Next thing

00:22:18.760 he hears is

00:22:19.320 that Kamala

00:22:19.840 Harris has

00:22:20.440 been chosen,

00:22:22.000 literally the

00:22:23.380 vice president

00:22:24.420 that most

00:22:25.480 people think

00:22:26.200 isn't up

00:22:27.080 for the

00:22:27.360 job.

00:22:28.580 The

00:22:28.780 person,

00:22:30.040 the only

00:22:30.540 person in

00:22:31.120 American

00:22:31.480 politics right

00:22:32.380 now,

00:22:33.920 fact check

00:22:34.480 me on

00:22:34.800 this,

00:22:35.340 but probably

00:22:36.640 the lowest

00:22:37.720 regarded

00:22:38.360 politician in

00:22:40.200 the national

00:22:40.840 domain.

00:22:41.580 would you

00:22:42.640 say?

00:22:43.540 Could you

00:22:43.960 think of

00:22:44.260 anybody in

00:22:44.780 the national

00:22:45.440 domain,

00:22:46.280 not the

00:22:46.720 states,

00:22:47.300 not governors,

00:22:48.500 but in

00:22:49.080 the national

00:22:49.600 domain,

00:22:50.380 is there

00:22:50.700 anybody with

00:22:51.640 a worse

00:22:52.060 reputation

00:22:52.880 right now?

00:22:55.260 Pelosi?

00:22:56.200 I don't know.

00:22:56.860 Pelosi is

00:22:57.380 probably really

00:22:57.940 popular with

00:22:58.620 their own

00:22:59.000 team,

00:22:59.320 though.

00:23:00.540 I can't,

00:23:00.880 I can't,

00:23:01.400 well,

00:23:01.660 Omar,

00:23:02.160 okay,

00:23:02.680 that would

00:23:03.040 have been,

00:23:06.200 yeah,

00:23:07.880 Omar might 1.00

00:23:08.380 be less

00:23:08.720 popular.

00:23:09.260 Okay,

00:23:09.580 that would

00:23:09.780 be a good

00:23:10.340 example.

00:23:11.580 But poor

00:23:12.840 Governor Newsom,

00:23:14.100 he seems

00:23:14.560 doomed,

00:23:15.200 because if

00:23:15.940 you have

00:23:16.280 to rely

00:23:16.840 on the

00:23:17.940 glow of

00:23:20.220 Kamala

00:23:20.820 Harris'

00:23:21.460 reputation

00:23:22.060 to pull

00:23:23.060 you over

00:23:23.420 the finish

00:23:24.180 line,

00:23:25.380 you might

00:23:26.660 not make

00:23:27.100 it over

00:23:27.320 the finish

00:23:27.740 line,

00:23:28.320 so it's

00:23:28.700 not looking

00:23:29.060 good.

00:23:30.480 Meanwhile,

00:23:31.280 over in

00:23:31.700 Chicago,

00:23:32.520 46 people,

00:23:33.920 including

00:23:34.300 eight children,

00:23:35.060 have been

00:23:35.340 shot over

00:23:36.260 the weekend.

00:23:36.780 46 people

00:23:38.800 shot in

00:23:40.300 Chicago over

00:23:41.140 the weekend.

00:23:42.480 Question,

00:23:44.000 how many

00:23:44.480 people were

00:23:44.980 shot in

00:23:45.500 Kabul over

00:23:46.260 the weekend?

00:23:48.040 I mean,

00:23:48.660 actually,

00:23:49.100 seriously,

00:23:50.040 how many

00:23:50.760 people in

00:23:51.420 Kabul were 1.00

00:23:53.000 shot over

00:23:54.620 the weekend?

00:23:55.920 I mean,

00:23:56.220 it might have

00:23:56.580 been more,

00:23:57.980 but you're

00:23:59.660 not sure,

00:24:00.260 are you?

00:24:01.700 It might have

00:24:02.560 been more,

00:24:03.620 could have

00:24:03.940 been a lot

00:24:04.280 more,

00:24:05.520 but you're

00:24:06.140 not sure.

00:24:07.740 Just think

00:24:08.200 about that.

00:24:09.400 Think about

00:24:09.920 the fact

00:24:10.360 that off

00:24:10.780 the top

00:24:11.160 of your

00:24:11.340 head,

00:24:11.940 you're not

00:24:12.720 sure if

00:24:13.980 Chicago had

00:24:14.700 more gun

00:24:15.200 violence than

00:24:15.880 Kabul this

00:24:16.600 weekend.

00:24:18.400 I don't

00:24:19.000 know.

00:24:20.460 Yeah.

00:24:22.960 Well,

00:24:23.500 here's the

00:24:23.880 fun part.

00:24:24.600 I know,

00:24:25.100 you're waiting

00:24:25.440 for the good

00:24:25.860 part.

00:24:26.700 I took you

00:24:27.160 through all

00:24:27.440 the bad

00:24:27.720 part to get

00:24:28.220 to the good

00:24:28.520 part,

00:24:28.780 to make it

00:24:29.120 feel extra,

00:24:30.240 extra good,

00:24:30.980 and watch

00:24:31.520 how good this

00:24:32.080 feels.

00:24:33.240 We have

00:24:33.660 some news

00:24:34.080 about the

00:24:34.420 upcoming

00:24:34.820 Arizona

00:24:35.700 audit results.

00:24:38.920 And from

00:24:39.380 this tweet,

00:24:40.180 whose name

00:24:41.100 I didn't

00:24:41.440 write down,

00:24:41.960 Wendy,

00:24:42.620 Wendy,

00:24:43.720 I don't know,

00:24:44.880 and the

00:24:47.100 tweet says,

00:24:47.620 the audit

00:24:47.940 is coming,

00:24:48.640 guys,

00:24:49.340 I promise

00:24:50.080 you.

00:24:50.420 Now,

00:24:50.620 here's what

00:24:50.900 we're going

00:24:51.160 to do.

00:24:51.420 We're going

00:24:51.700 to read

00:24:52.020 between the

00:24:52.560 lines,

00:24:53.120 okay?

00:24:53.840 So I'm

00:24:54.240 going to

00:24:54.420 read you

00:24:54.760 the tweet

00:24:55.240 and the

00:24:56.240 rest of

00:24:56.540 the thread,

00:24:57.740 and then I

00:24:58.200 want you

00:24:58.520 to see

00:24:59.000 if Wendy

00:25:01.000 Rogers,

00:25:01.520 yes,

00:25:01.800 thank you,

00:25:02.160 it's a

00:25:02.360 Wendy Rogers 0.82

00:25:02.940 tweet,

00:25:03.660 and I

00:25:04.420 want you

00:25:04.740 to see

00:25:05.040 if you

00:25:05.320 can read

00:25:05.700 between

00:25:06.040 the lines

00:25:06.680 and tell

00:25:07.720 me if

00:25:08.060 Wendy Rogers 0.82

00:25:08.740 is hinting

00:25:09.920 to you

00:25:10.380 that there's

00:25:11.180 something big

00:25:11.820 coming,

00:25:13.080 or is she

00:25:14.700 hinting that

00:25:15.360 they didn't

00:25:15.720 find anything?

00:25:17.620 All right?

00:25:18.100 So we're

00:25:18.560 going to read

00:25:18.840 between the

00:25:19.320 lines and

00:25:19.920 see what

00:25:20.340 you think.

00:25:21.480 Did they

00:25:21.800 find the

00:25:22.360 goods,

00:25:23.420 or did

00:25:23.760 they not?

00:25:24.280 Because at

00:25:24.660 this point,

00:25:25.140 they'd be

00:25:25.460 signaling to

00:25:26.080 us in

00:25:26.400 advance,

00:25:26.900 I think.

00:25:27.980 All right?

00:25:28.240 So I'll

00:25:28.460 read it again.

00:25:29.180 Look for

00:25:29.520 that.

00:25:29.820 The audit

00:25:31.100 is coming,

00:25:31.700 guys.

00:25:32.020 I promise

00:25:32.480 you.

00:25:33.100 I get a lot

00:25:33.680 of comments

00:25:34.160 asking,

00:25:34.800 and people

00:25:35.100 think I can

00:25:35.680 speed it up,

00:25:36.340 but I can't

00:25:36.900 speed it up.

00:25:37.900 It is a process,

00:25:38.860 and it is coming.

00:25:40.260 Also, other

00:25:41.440 information is

00:25:42.480 coming out I

00:25:43.440 can't disclose.

00:25:45.840 Just know that

00:25:46.980 it is all

00:25:47.540 going to

00:25:48.060 happen, and

00:25:49.660 this is real.

00:25:51.900 Keep the

00:25:52.400 faith.

00:25:53.680 Make sure

00:25:54.020 your state is

00:25:54.700 doing an

00:25:55.020 audit, because

00:25:55.480 when our

00:25:55.860 audit comes

00:25:56.380 out, the

00:25:57.360 next steps

00:25:57.940 are to get

00:25:59.320 this done in

00:26:00.040 other states.

00:26:01.320 Start pushing

00:26:02.040 that now.

00:26:04.480 Okay?

00:26:05.700 Now, did

00:26:07.020 you hear in

00:26:07.660 any of those

00:26:08.180 words an

00:26:09.620 indication that

00:26:10.620 they found

00:26:11.260 enough fraud

00:26:12.200 that would

00:26:12.660 change the

00:26:13.300 outcome of

00:26:13.780 the election?

00:26:15.060 How many

00:26:15.540 people think

00:26:16.220 that this is

00:26:17.500 hinting that

00:26:18.140 they found

00:26:18.640 it?

00:26:19.240 They found

00:26:19.700 the goods?

00:26:20.960 I'm going to

00:26:21.500 look at your

00:26:21.960 comments.

00:26:23.160 I'm saying

00:26:23.620 no's, yes's,

00:26:24.840 no's, maybe

00:26:26.800 nothing, huge,

00:26:29.600 nope, yep,

00:26:30.400 yep, I'm

00:26:31.020 saying yes's

00:26:31.580 and no's.

00:26:32.580 So you're

00:26:32.980 kind of split,

00:26:33.820 but I think

00:26:34.200 more no's

00:26:34.760 than yes's.

00:26:35.740 Here is my

00:26:36.580 official opinion.

00:26:38.440 This looks

00:26:39.200 like a no.

00:26:41.200 Right?

00:26:41.580 Now, we

00:26:41.940 can't know

00:26:42.280 for sure, so

00:26:43.020 we're all

00:26:43.660 just guessing

00:26:44.360 and trying

00:26:45.380 to calculate

00:26:46.260 the odds

00:26:46.720 here.

00:26:47.480 But if I

00:26:48.080 had to

00:26:48.580 place a

00:26:49.020 bet, I

00:26:50.980 would bet

00:26:51.420 that the

00:26:51.780 outcome, just

00:26:52.440 based on

00:26:52.980 reading between

00:26:53.680 the lines,

00:26:54.540 my bet is

00:26:55.320 that they

00:26:55.720 will find

00:26:56.400 some fraud

00:26:57.100 or they

00:26:59.800 will find

00:27:00.380 that there

00:27:00.900 could have

00:27:01.580 been enough

00:27:02.660 fraud, but

00:27:04.160 they couldn't

00:27:04.800 prove it.

00:27:06.540 So I think

00:27:07.180 where this is

00:27:07.720 going to come

00:27:08.100 out is there

00:27:09.580 could have

00:27:10.160 been fraud,

00:27:10.840 fraud, but

00:27:11.180 we couldn't

00:27:11.640 look at

00:27:11.960 everything, but

00:27:13.560 we didn't

00:27:13.980 find enough.

00:27:14.800 We found

00:27:15.220 a little, and

00:27:16.520 that suggests

00:27:17.100 that there

00:27:17.800 is fraud, not

00:27:19.160 necessarily enough

00:27:20.180 to change any

00:27:20.900 result, but

00:27:22.660 we think that

00:27:24.400 it could be

00:27:24.980 there because

00:27:25.680 we couldn't

00:27:26.220 check everything.

00:27:28.800 You want to

00:27:29.700 bet against

00:27:30.100 that prediction?

00:27:31.400 I wouldn't

00:27:31.980 bet against

00:27:32.440 that prediction.

00:27:33.000 as predictions

00:27:35.560 go, that

00:27:37.820 one's probably

00:27:38.820 as accurate as

00:27:40.800 any prediction

00:27:41.380 will ever be.

00:27:42.420 If you've

00:27:42.860 lived in the

00:27:43.360 real world, you

00:27:44.760 know that they

00:27:45.300 didn't find it.

00:27:46.880 Because if they

00:27:47.740 found the goods,

00:27:49.740 Wendy would 0.93

00:27:50.340 have tipped us

00:27:51.460 off.

00:27:53.400 Absolutely, you

00:27:54.440 would know by

00:27:55.060 now that

00:27:55.820 something's

00:27:56.320 coming.

00:27:57.060 But instead,

00:27:58.360 instead of

00:27:58.960 telling you that

00:27:59.520 they found

00:28:00.120 something in the

00:28:01.060 audit, here's

00:28:02.180 what she

00:28:02.520 teases.

00:28:04.460 She said,

00:28:05.320 also, other

00:28:06.140 information is

00:28:06.940 coming out I

00:28:07.620 can't disclose.

00:28:09.560 So that's the

00:28:10.500 part that made

00:28:10.980 you think, oh,

00:28:11.540 she's got some

00:28:12.160 good stuff, right?

00:28:13.620 She's got other

00:28:14.480 information, and

00:28:15.840 she's hinting at

00:28:16.580 us she can't

00:28:17.620 disclose.

00:28:19.180 There's no way

00:28:20.360 that she's

00:28:21.300 referring to

00:28:21.900 finding a bunch

00:28:22.700 of fraud, or

00:28:24.420 at least enough

00:28:25.440 fraud to change

00:28:26.220 the election

00:28:26.620 outcome.

00:28:27.780 There's no way

00:28:28.640 that's what that

00:28:29.280 means.

00:28:30.320 What it means

00:28:31.020 is that the

00:28:32.520 they may have

00:28:33.080 moved the

00:28:33.460 goalposts.

00:28:34.900 It might mean

00:28:36.040 that they're

00:28:37.040 trying to find a

00:28:37.780 shiny object to

00:28:38.680 concentrate on, so

00:28:40.160 it looks like the

00:28:40.780 audit found

00:28:41.300 something.

00:28:42.820 That's what it

00:28:43.460 looks like.

00:28:44.480 So if I had to

00:28:45.420 put money on it,

00:28:46.260 I'd say they

00:28:46.700 didn't find

00:28:47.140 anything, or

00:28:48.220 they didn't find

00:28:48.820 enough to change

00:28:50.220 the result, but

00:28:51.540 they might try to

00:28:52.240 paint it as if

00:28:53.120 maybe they did,

00:28:54.000 almost sort of,

00:28:55.080 kind of.

00:28:55.600 let's talk about

00:29:00.000 climate change.

00:29:02.400 So the news is

00:29:04.780 saying it's

00:29:05.180 affecting people's

00:29:06.740 health, and that

00:29:09.800 world leaders need

00:29:10.780 to address the

00:29:11.620 climate crisis now

00:29:12.820 because we're all

00:29:14.600 going to die from

00:29:15.840 the climate crisis,

00:29:17.280 and why it

00:29:18.420 matters.

00:29:18.820 So a bunch of

00:29:19.780 publications got

00:29:20.600 together to issue a

00:29:22.520 joint statement to

00:29:23.340 world leaders, and

00:29:25.100 apparently it's the

00:29:25.740 first time so

00:29:26.640 many independent,

00:29:28.500 well, so many

00:29:29.260 organizations got

00:29:30.720 together with the

00:29:31.300 same message.

00:29:32.360 So here are the

00:29:33.040 ones that are

00:29:34.220 saying that the

00:29:35.460 climate change is

00:29:36.640 going to cause

00:29:37.120 severe health care

00:29:38.920 bad outcomes.

00:29:40.460 Among them are

00:29:41.180 the American

00:29:41.760 Medical Association,

00:29:44.860 the Lancet, and

00:29:46.860 the British Medical

00:29:47.860 Journal.

00:29:48.980 So those were

00:29:49.560 among the many,

00:29:50.680 many entities that

00:29:52.620 were saying that

00:29:53.360 climate change is a

00:29:54.480 big problem.

00:29:55.100 How do you feel

00:29:56.780 about that?

00:29:58.240 Because the

00:29:58.880 Lancet, the

00:30:00.440 Lancet says it's a

00:30:01.340 big problem.

00:30:02.800 So they're

00:30:03.560 credible, right?

00:30:05.420 No.

00:30:06.420 No, they're not

00:30:07.340 credible.

00:30:08.240 Not at all.

00:30:09.500 American Medical

00:30:10.260 Association, not so

00:30:12.300 much.

00:30:13.320 Not so much.

00:30:14.440 No, I would say

00:30:15.060 these are not

00:30:15.680 credible organizations.

00:30:17.420 Now, that doesn't

00:30:18.000 mean they're wrong.

00:30:19.960 You know, I'm

00:30:21.160 actually concerned.

00:30:22.040 I think that the

00:30:23.740 concern that

00:30:24.680 climate change

00:30:25.840 could cause

00:30:26.560 medical problems

00:30:27.820 around the world,

00:30:28.600 that's something we

00:30:29.240 should really worry

00:30:29.980 about.

00:30:30.700 Because whether or

00:30:31.580 not it's human

00:30:32.320 caused or not,

00:30:33.440 you're going to end

00:30:34.400 up with the same

00:30:35.040 health problem.

00:30:37.220 So, yeah, it's a

00:30:39.800 little like,

00:30:40.300 exactly, somebody

00:30:41.120 saying in the

00:30:41.580 comments on

00:30:42.120 locals, it's a

00:30:43.440 little like these

00:30:44.020 17 intel agencies

00:30:45.560 all agreeing.

00:30:46.220 agreeing, it's

00:30:47.920 never 17 intel

00:30:49.260 agencies agreeing.

00:30:50.800 It's a few people

00:30:51.920 in one of them

00:30:52.540 looked into it, and

00:30:53.880 the other intel

00:30:54.700 agencies said,

00:30:56.260 well, that guy

00:30:57.260 looks competent, so

00:30:58.260 we agree.

00:30:59.900 That's it.

00:31:00.780 A few people in

00:31:01.600 one organization, and

00:31:02.880 then all 17 say,

00:31:03.960 yeah, that sounds

00:31:04.500 credible.

00:31:05.560 Yeah, we're in.

00:31:07.660 So, that's what

00:31:09.660 that looks like,

00:31:10.220 too.

00:31:11.580 All right.

00:31:11.940 That is everything

00:31:14.860 I wanted to talk

00:31:15.680 about today.

00:31:22.300 I think there

00:31:23.160 were, what was

00:31:24.460 it, 64 people

00:31:25.900 died in Hurricane

00:31:27.020 Ida so far?

00:31:28.800 Isn't that more

00:31:29.400 than you expected?

00:31:31.220 I think that was

00:31:32.120 the number, 60

00:31:33.160 something.

00:31:34.180 And that's way

00:31:35.180 more than I

00:31:35.660 thought.

00:31:35.960 I thought the

00:31:36.340 number was going

00:31:37.060 to be closer to

00:31:38.260 two to four.

00:31:40.820 Because the

00:31:41.920 didn't we have

00:31:42.560 a lot of

00:31:43.100 warning?

00:31:44.360 I feel like we

00:31:45.020 had tons of

00:31:45.640 warning.

00:31:47.060 So, there's

00:31:48.400 something wrong

00:31:49.020 with our ability

00:31:49.780 to evacuate if

00:31:51.080 people are dying

00:31:52.080 when we know

00:31:52.860 trouble's coming.

00:31:55.240 New York was

00:31:56.120 unprepared.

00:31:57.240 Yeah, that's

00:31:57.680 true.

00:31:57.920 I guess there

00:31:58.320 were some

00:31:58.960 floodings that

00:32:00.560 were hard to

00:32:02.600 predict.

00:32:05.660 All right.

00:32:07.980 Would you like

00:32:08.840 to drum for

00:32:09.380 the Rolling

00:32:09.760 Stones?

00:32:11.300 Yeah.

00:32:11.920 You know,

00:32:12.760 true story,

00:32:13.840 my drum

00:32:14.540 teacher and

00:32:15.840 I had

00:32:16.260 decided that

00:32:17.100 Charlie Watts,

00:32:19.020 the now

00:32:19.600 deceased drummer

00:32:20.320 for the Stones,

00:32:20.940 was going to

00:32:21.260 be sort of

00:32:21.680 my role

00:32:22.260 model because

00:32:23.360 he'd be

00:32:23.680 relatively easy

00:32:25.340 to imitate

00:32:26.100 and that

00:32:26.560 would get

00:32:26.840 you started.

00:32:27.840 And then he

00:32:28.140 dies.

00:32:29.200 As soon as I

00:32:29.960 pick him as

00:32:30.840 my role

00:32:31.240 model, he

00:32:31.680 dies.

00:32:32.420 read the

00:32:41.540 fact

00:32:41.860 inconvenient

00:32:42.540 facts.

00:32:43.560 All right.

00:32:47.760 Please don't

00:32:48.460 choose any more

00:32:49.060 role models.

00:32:49.640 What am I

00:32:56.380 going to do

00:32:56.800 an e-bike

00:32:57.480 live stream?

00:32:59.660 Yeah, you

00:33:00.120 know, maybe I

00:33:00.920 should just

00:33:01.280 tape my

00:33:02.160 phone to my

00:33:02.720 e-bike and

00:33:03.260 go for a

00:33:03.660 ride.

00:33:04.200 Would you

00:33:04.480 like that?

00:33:05.440 I've been

00:33:05.900 waiting for

00:33:06.380 the smoke

00:33:08.560 to go down

00:33:09.440 because I

00:33:09.800 can't really

00:33:10.280 exercise outside.

00:33:12.640 Oh, should I

00:33:13.120 paint my

00:33:13.480 nail? 0.88

00:33:14.880 People are

00:33:15.420 saying that my

00:33:15.980 bruise on my

00:33:16.780 fingernail is

00:33:17.520 distracting.

00:33:18.080 I should just

00:33:18.720 paint my

00:33:19.080 nails. 0.99

00:33:20.300 That does

00:33:20.940 look pretty

00:33:21.320 ugly.

00:33:21.900 It lasts a

00:33:22.440 year.

00:33:23.380 It'll take a

00:33:23.860 year for those

00:33:24.680 bruises to

00:33:25.300 grow out.

00:33:27.700 Do I

00:33:28.000 pedal?

00:33:28.420 Yes.

00:33:29.800 In California,

00:33:30.940 you have to

00:33:31.400 pedal an

00:33:31.980 e-bike so

00:33:33.500 that it's just

00:33:34.140 an assisted

00:33:34.740 bicycle.

00:33:35.420 Otherwise,

00:33:35.780 it's a

00:33:36.040 motorcycle.

00:33:37.040 And then you

00:33:37.400 have to

00:33:37.640 license it.

00:33:39.200 How is

00:33:39.560 Boo? 0.54

00:33:41.900 I don't

00:33:42.860 know.

00:33:44.180 I mean,

00:33:44.540 she seems

00:33:45.120 happy, but

00:33:45.800 she's different,

00:33:46.720 definitely.

00:33:48.280 Plans for

00:33:48.720 a new

00:33:48.940 book, just

00:33:51.500 some thoughts

00:33:52.240 about it.

00:33:52.640 I don't

00:33:52.800 have plans

00:33:53.280 yet.

00:33:55.920 All right.

00:33:56.600 That's all I

00:33:57.000 got for now,

00:33:57.520 and I will

00:33:58.040 see you later

00:33:59.040 on YouTube.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - September 06, 2021

Episode 1491 Scott Adams： Biden Regret Syndrome (BRS) is Sweeping the Country. Find Out How Bad it is

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript