Real Coffee with Scott Adams - August 21, 2022


Episode 1842 Scott Adams： Republicans Might Have Trouble In The Midterms, The Big Bang Might Be Fake


Episode Stats

Length

48 minutes

Words per Minute

127.2606

Word Count

6,230

Sentence Count

523

Misogynist Sentences

11

Hate Speech Sentences

19


Summary

Everything we thought we knew about the universe has been debunked, and there's another explanation. Plus, the daughter of a close ally of Vladimir Putin has been killed in a car bomb in Russia, and a new theory about how the universe got here.


Transcript

00:00:00.160 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of civilization.
00:00:05.660 It's the greatest thing since the Big Bang.
00:00:09.000 Oops.
00:00:10.560 We're going to talk about that.
00:00:12.640 But before we do that, would you like to take it up a level?
00:00:17.620 Would you like to take your energy up to places that nobody's ever been before?
00:00:23.280 Yeah, you do.
00:00:24.200 And all you need is a cupper mug or a glass of tank or chalice or stein,
00:00:27.440 a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind.
00:00:31.200 And if you're new to the locals' platform, be sure you don't over-sip, no overdosing.
00:00:37.540 But for the rest of you, please join me in the unparalleled pleasure,
00:00:43.600 the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better.
00:00:47.300 It's called the simultaneous sip.
00:00:50.040 And it happens now.
00:00:51.880 Go.
00:00:52.200 Go.
00:00:52.260 Oh, yeah.
00:00:58.820 Yeah, that's the stuff.
00:01:00.840 That is the stuff.
00:01:03.380 All my systems are coming online.
00:01:07.640 Does it feel as good to you as it does to me?
00:01:10.500 Do you feel a tingle yet?
00:01:12.360 Oh, you will.
00:01:13.740 Because the show is just getting started.
00:01:16.360 That tingle will hit you any minute now.
00:01:18.680 So, it turns out the Big Bang has been debunked.
00:01:24.660 I talked about this in my live stream last night from my man cave,
00:01:29.100 which only the locals' people watched.
00:01:32.260 But it turns out that the Hubble telescope can look so far into the universe,
00:01:37.860 we can find out that everything we know is wrong.
00:01:41.960 Everything we know is wrong.
00:01:43.340 Oh, it's the Webb, not the Hubble, it's the Webb.
00:01:47.800 Sorry.
00:01:49.040 Wrong telescope.
00:01:51.060 James Webb, okay.
00:01:52.340 Okay, James Webb.
00:01:54.080 We're now corrected.
00:01:57.380 But it turns out everything we thought we knew about the universe was wrong.
00:02:02.400 And here's the dumb guy's explanation of the smart people's realization.
00:02:08.840 If you look to the farthest parts of the galaxy,
00:02:12.560 the one thing you should definitely expect to see
00:02:14.760 is that they look younger,
00:02:17.800 that the furthest galaxies would look the youngest
00:02:21.100 because they were the original ones that have been expanding the furthest.
00:02:26.280 But they're not younger.
00:02:28.640 Or they're not as young as they need to be.
00:02:31.260 In other words, when you look at the universe,
00:02:34.140 the Big Bang theory just collapses.
00:02:37.100 It collapses.
00:02:38.160 It collapses.
00:02:39.920 So whatever is true about the universe,
00:02:43.860 the Big Bang probably isn't true.
00:02:46.700 And all the people who have been working in that field forever
00:02:49.320 are being kind of quiet about it.
00:02:52.800 But apparently, according to at least one report in hot air,
00:02:57.900 but reportedly they're all pretty nervous about the fact
00:03:01.080 that the most basic thing that we thought we knew about reality,
00:03:04.900 that's not true.
00:03:05.560 Not even true.
00:03:08.620 So, what would be a way to explain how everything got here
00:03:12.900 without the Big Bang?
00:03:16.340 Huh.
00:03:18.020 Well, looks like we're back to intelligent design, maybe.
00:03:23.060 Maybe a little God hypothesis back in the mix.
00:03:26.560 Maybe.
00:03:28.240 Maybe.
00:03:28.880 But whether it's God or some species that created another simulation
00:03:38.280 and it's us, we don't know.
00:03:40.720 Or it could be just that there's another scientific explanation
00:03:43.640 that we just don't know yet.
00:03:45.780 But if you had guessed that both evolution and the Big Bang
00:03:50.400 would be debunked in your lifetime,
00:03:53.180 well, you would have been right, I think.
00:03:58.700 All right.
00:04:00.020 And I say both of those are debunked
00:04:02.680 because the simulation theory
00:04:05.180 is far more likely an explanation
00:04:07.920 of how we're here.
00:04:09.420 And it doesn't require either evolution,
00:04:13.880 neither evolution nor the Big Bang
00:04:15.500 are not required if we're a simulation.
00:04:17.960 Because software can just make things any way it wants.
00:04:20.860 So the big news is that the daughter
00:04:25.280 of one of Putin's closer allies
00:04:29.320 just got murdered in a car bomb in Russia.
00:04:33.520 Now, reportedly, and this is not reliable yet,
00:04:37.340 reportedly the father was supposed to be in the car also,
00:04:40.440 but at the last minute they may have taken different cars.
00:04:43.300 But the car that was supposed to have
00:04:44.960 Putin's close advisor in it blew up.
00:04:49.080 But the close advisor's daughter was in it.
00:04:53.640 Yeah, so Alexander Dugin was his name.
00:04:57.560 Now, there's some disagreement about how close he was
00:05:00.000 or how influential he was to Putin,
00:05:03.620 but it feels to me like maybe Ukraine just sent him a message.
00:05:08.160 What do you think?
00:05:09.600 Did Ukraine just send a message?
00:05:12.700 If you were Ukraine,
00:05:14.160 wouldn't you try to take out the leadership
00:05:15.680 in Moscow, if you could?
00:05:20.160 Because Russia tried to decapitation strike on Ukraine.
00:05:25.360 If you're trying to take out the leader of one country,
00:05:28.440 doesn't that country have the right
00:05:29.760 to try to take out your leader?
00:05:32.340 I mean, forget about whether it's a right,
00:05:35.100 because war is not about what's right.
00:05:36.900 Certainly, it's a free punch.
00:05:41.460 It's a free punch.
00:05:43.380 Now, of course, you're all going to say
00:05:47.380 it's some kind of weird false flag,
00:05:49.100 and China or the United States or Great Britain did it.
00:05:52.980 There's no evidence of any of that.
00:05:55.640 There's one candidate who looks really likely.
00:06:00.440 I don't think it's the CIA.
00:06:01.740 I mean, I suppose if the CIA killed a top Russian
00:06:07.220 and then got caught,
00:06:10.340 that could never be worth the risk.
00:06:12.920 There's no way the CIA would think it's worth the risk
00:06:16.160 to take out a civilian who's just an advisor.
00:06:21.720 Let me say that that sounds personal.
00:06:25.780 It sounds personal.
00:06:27.280 Because apparently this guy was also a super pro-nationalist.
00:06:33.700 So that's exactly who the Ukrainians would want to take.
00:06:37.060 Everything about this feels personal.
00:06:39.040 It doesn't feel...
00:06:40.600 If the CIA did it, it would be professional.
00:06:43.860 And it would have, like, a clear strategic benefit.
00:06:48.040 This doesn't look exactly like it has a strategic benefit.
00:06:51.500 It looks personal.
00:06:53.520 I think they're just going to kill as many people
00:06:55.660 close to Putin as they can.
00:06:58.280 I would.
00:07:00.100 You know, if I were Zelensky,
00:07:02.180 I would try to...
00:07:03.360 And I knew that Putin was trying to kill me
00:07:05.380 and people I loved.
00:07:06.800 I would kill as many people around him as I could get to.
00:07:10.520 So I assume it's him.
00:07:12.340 But you've got to be careful about your assumptions.
00:07:16.260 Speaking of assumptions,
00:07:18.580 Mitch McConnell warns us,
00:07:20.920 and I think he's right about this,
00:07:22.660 that don't get too cocky
00:07:24.740 about some big red wave coming for the midterms.
00:07:28.760 The House might, in fact, turn Republican.
00:07:33.520 But you should be warned
00:07:36.000 that Senate races are different.
00:07:38.680 And even if one party is more popular than the other,
00:07:42.020 Senate races tend to turn on the quality of the candidate.
00:07:45.800 So the Senate is way more about
00:07:48.800 the individual differences between the candidates.
00:07:52.100 The House races are a little bit more
00:07:53.780 do you like to be a Republican
00:07:54.940 or do you like to be a Democrat today?
00:07:58.420 So don't get comfortable
00:08:01.200 that there's going to be a red wave
00:08:03.320 that takes both houses.
00:08:05.260 The Senate is probably a toss-up.
00:08:08.320 The Senate is probably a toss-up.
00:08:10.580 Now, of course, Mitch would want to say that,
00:08:12.880 Mitch McConnell,
00:08:14.240 to make sure that Republicans go and vote.
00:08:17.660 So this is the phase
00:08:19.440 where both sides are going to tell you,
00:08:20.980 well, it's really close.
00:08:22.680 You better vote.
00:08:24.560 We don't know which way it goes.
00:08:26.160 If you stay home, it could be up to you.
00:08:28.760 So there's a little of that going on, too.
00:08:31.740 But I do buy that theory
00:08:33.280 that the Senate is more about
00:08:34.560 the candidate than the House is.
00:08:37.500 Does that sound right to you?
00:08:41.440 Sounds right to me.
00:08:42.880 All right.
00:08:45.020 There's a new thing happening
00:08:46.960 that I'm seeing so much
00:08:48.260 and I absolutely hate it.
00:08:50.460 And I call it the cringe victory lap.
00:08:54.060 The cringe victory lap.
00:08:56.580 It's people who had a position
00:08:58.480 during the pandemic
00:08:59.520 who believed that the science
00:09:01.680 has now proven that they were right,
00:09:04.080 but it didn't.
00:09:06.180 And so people are doing victory laps
00:09:08.220 on stuff that really isn't proven.
00:09:10.820 It might be a little evidence,
00:09:13.480 you know, that looks like
00:09:14.500 it's in your favor,
00:09:15.380 but a lot of stuff isn't proven.
00:09:18.440 And one of those things
00:09:19.400 that's happening is,
00:09:20.840 you know, I talked about
00:09:21.540 the vitamin D study
00:09:22.640 that's highly correlated
00:09:24.380 with COVID outcomes.
00:09:26.160 Highly, highly correlated.
00:09:27.800 Study after study.
00:09:29.780 And therefore,
00:09:30.540 you should have taken vitamin D
00:09:32.360 and you didn't need
00:09:34.360 those vaccinations,
00:09:35.900 say a number of people
00:09:36.900 on social media.
00:09:39.680 But this study doesn't say
00:09:41.660 anything like that.
00:09:43.220 Not even close.
00:09:44.960 The study says
00:09:45.780 there's a correlation.
00:09:48.000 That's it.
00:09:48.560 Somebody told me
00:09:51.500 just before I got on here,
00:09:52.920 and so it's just something
00:09:53.780 I saw on Twitter,
00:09:55.660 maybe if there's a doctor here
00:09:57.100 you can confirm
00:09:58.040 or debunk this.
00:10:00.160 I think there are enough
00:10:01.060 doctors watching this
00:10:02.060 that we can get an answer
00:10:03.000 pretty soon.
00:10:04.080 Somebody said that vitamin D,
00:10:05.640 low vitamin D levels,
00:10:06.760 are highly correlated
00:10:08.120 with heart disease.
00:10:10.880 True or false?
00:10:12.380 Low vitamin D,
00:10:13.580 highly correlated
00:10:14.400 with heart disease.
00:10:16.740 True?
00:10:16.960 True or false?
00:10:21.680 Let's see.
00:10:22.960 If you're a doctor,
00:10:24.240 say you're a doctor
00:10:24.940 before you give me the answer.
00:10:28.600 I think the answer is yes.
00:10:30.920 But if you see something
00:10:31.960 different there,
00:10:33.200 tell me.
00:10:34.040 So, low vitamin D,
00:10:36.660 highly correlated
00:10:37.620 with heart problems.
00:10:40.860 So therefore,
00:10:42.060 you should give everybody
00:10:42.980 who has heart problems
00:10:43.940 vitamin D supplements, right?
00:10:45.380 Doesn't that make sense?
00:10:47.880 Highly, highly correlated.
00:10:50.240 But they don't do that.
00:10:53.620 They don't do that.
00:10:55.260 Do you know why?
00:10:56.160 Because they have not proven
00:10:57.480 that vitamin D supplements
00:10:58.840 help your heart disease.
00:11:01.320 They just know it's correlated.
00:11:03.820 So, be careful.
00:11:05.240 The COVID thing could be that.
00:11:06.780 Now, every time you find,
00:11:09.280 you know,
00:11:09.540 another study
00:11:10.220 that's in the same direction,
00:11:11.780 well, maybe it's telling you more.
00:11:14.040 But it seems to me
00:11:15.180 that if you did
00:11:15.780 a hundred
00:11:16.260 randomized controlled trials
00:11:18.660 and every one of them
00:11:20.380 confirmed that vitamin D
00:11:21.600 is highly correlated
00:11:22.760 with good outcomes,
00:11:25.100 it still,
00:11:26.000 still would tell you nothing
00:11:27.720 about whether you should
00:11:29.460 take more vitamin D.
00:11:32.440 It feels like it does,
00:11:34.140 but it doesn't matter
00:11:35.120 how many of those tests you do.
00:11:36.620 It's just telling you
00:11:37.520 the correlation exists.
00:11:39.200 But the correlation
00:11:40.260 should exist.
00:11:42.120 Somebody said to me,
00:11:43.180 but Scott, Scott, Scott,
00:11:44.400 if you have a hypothesis,
00:11:46.500 that's how you know
00:11:48.660 that the study is valid.
00:11:50.040 Because the hypothesis is
00:11:51.380 better vitamin D
00:11:53.180 gives better outcomes.
00:11:54.600 But there are two hypotheses.
00:11:56.860 One hypothesis is that
00:11:58.320 people in poor health
00:11:59.760 have bad outcomes
00:12:00.580 and people in bad health
00:12:01.780 have low vitamin D.
00:12:02.920 So I don't want
00:12:04.320 to beat this to death,
00:12:05.320 but if you're doing
00:12:06.640 a cringe victory lap
00:12:08.260 based on some science
00:12:09.500 that does not support
00:12:10.540 your point of view,
00:12:11.640 it doesn't conflict with it,
00:12:13.560 it just doesn't support it.
00:12:17.200 Now,
00:12:18.400 somebody pointed out
00:12:20.100 that I'm a hypocrite
00:12:21.280 because I have a tweet
00:12:23.120 from long ago
00:12:24.160 saying that vitamin D tests
00:12:26.260 could be used
00:12:27.140 to end the pandemic.
00:12:29.340 And somebody said,
00:12:32.360 Scott,
00:12:33.560 why do you say
00:12:34.500 vitamin D is
00:12:35.720 only correlated
00:12:37.560 and yet at the same time
00:12:39.220 you're saying
00:12:39.620 a vitamin D test
00:12:40.540 would be useful
00:12:41.160 to end the pandemic?
00:12:42.120 How do you explain
00:12:43.000 that total inconsistency,
00:12:44.800 Scott?
00:12:46.560 Does anybody know
00:12:47.500 how I explain that?
00:12:49.380 How do I explain
00:12:50.300 the total inconsistency
00:12:51.860 that I believe
00:12:53.080 a vitamin D test
00:12:54.220 would be very useful
00:12:55.220 to have ended
00:12:56.200 the pandemic sooner?
00:12:57.440 but I also don't think
00:12:59.600 that the causation
00:13:00.640 is demonstrated.
00:13:02.920 It's not inconsistent
00:13:04.220 at all.
00:13:06.220 I'm saying that
00:13:07.220 correlation is demonstrated
00:13:08.640 and causation
00:13:09.640 might be true
00:13:10.540 but it hasn't been demonstrated.
00:13:12.680 Correlation is all
00:13:13.520 you need for the test.
00:13:15.260 You don't need
00:13:16.020 causation
00:13:17.040 to test
00:13:18.620 to see if somebody
00:13:19.400 is vulnerable.
00:13:20.500 If there's a correlation
00:13:21.800 that's all you need.
00:13:23.080 Oh, these people
00:13:23.720 are vulnerable.
00:13:24.760 There's no inconsistency
00:13:26.580 between those opinions.
00:13:29.260 All right.
00:13:29.980 Now just to make
00:13:30.780 everything complicated.
00:13:33.220 So now I've done
00:13:34.100 my impassioned,
00:13:37.120 overly repeated statement
00:13:39.180 that correlation
00:13:40.080 is not causation
00:13:41.060 and then CNN
00:13:42.340 has a report
00:13:43.180 that says obesity
00:13:44.360 might not make you unhealthy.
00:13:47.860 Do you know
00:13:48.480 what their argument is?
00:13:49.960 That obesity
00:13:51.000 might not be
00:13:52.780 an indicator
00:13:53.460 of bad health.
00:13:55.120 Do you know why?
00:13:55.720 Because it's a correlation
00:13:58.220 and the causation
00:14:01.220 has not been proven.
00:14:03.220 Does that sound
00:14:04.120 right to you?
00:14:05.420 Do you think
00:14:06.440 that obesity
00:14:06.960 is just a correlation?
00:14:09.680 It's not a causation?
00:14:12.460 Are we really
00:14:13.460 at a point
00:14:13.840 where that has not
00:14:14.600 been demonstrated?
00:14:17.260 Well, let's switch
00:14:18.100 over to Fox News.
00:14:20.080 Let's see
00:14:20.600 what Fox News says.
00:14:23.260 Let's see.
00:14:23.840 Fox News
00:14:24.320 has a story about
00:14:25.220 a sports
00:14:28.820 illustrated swimsuit
00:14:30.120 model
00:14:30.400 who's a plus-sized
00:14:31.820 woman
00:14:33.820 and she wants
00:14:36.000 you to know
00:14:36.440 that she can be
00:14:37.260 healthy too.
00:14:39.480 So both
00:14:40.340 the left
00:14:41.560 and the right
00:14:42.080 media
00:14:42.500 are telling
00:14:43.240 stories
00:14:43.840 that are
00:14:45.240 telling us
00:14:46.220 not to be
00:14:46.820 so harsh
00:14:47.580 with those
00:14:48.780 who have
00:14:49.140 extra weight
00:14:49.900 because
00:14:51.460 you're just
00:14:52.480 assuming
00:14:52.840 that they're
00:14:53.240 unhealthy
00:14:53.600 and that's
00:14:54.080 unfair.
00:14:59.700 Now,
00:15:00.400 it's really
00:15:00.880 tough for me
00:15:01.520 to go
00:15:01.940 from my
00:15:03.060 impassioned
00:15:03.640 argument
00:15:04.000 that correlation
00:15:05.520 does not
00:15:06.120 equal causation
00:15:07.100 and then
00:15:08.100 have this story
00:15:08.860 slap me in the face
00:15:09.860 because even
00:15:11.300 I think
00:15:12.000 correlation
00:15:12.560 equals causation
00:15:13.680 when it comes
00:15:14.180 to weight.
00:15:14.820 Do we really
00:15:17.720 not know that?
00:15:19.840 Now,
00:15:20.360 let me accept
00:15:21.580 I do accept
00:15:23.500 the notion
00:15:24.340 that there are
00:15:25.420 people carrying
00:15:26.060 extra weight
00:15:26.920 who are not
00:15:27.980 especially unhealthy.
00:15:30.220 We all agree
00:15:31.200 on that, right?
00:15:31.840 There are people
00:15:32.340 who have some
00:15:33.180 extra pounds
00:15:33.880 who are probably
00:15:35.240 healthier than
00:15:36.020 the average person.
00:15:37.440 That's got to be
00:15:38.240 true because there
00:15:39.200 are so many people
00:15:39.880 in the world.
00:15:40.720 We have all types.
00:15:41.480 So, you know,
00:15:43.340 any kind of person
00:15:44.200 you hypothesize
00:15:45.960 exists,
00:15:46.900 it probably does.
00:15:48.080 It probably exists.
00:15:50.280 But I'm pretty sure
00:15:51.700 that extra weight
00:15:52.620 is not doing you
00:15:53.500 any favors.
00:15:54.940 I mean, I can't
00:15:55.600 believe that it's
00:15:56.180 good for you
00:15:56.920 or that it's
00:15:58.020 even neutral.
00:15:59.560 But, okay.
00:16:05.780 Yeah.
00:16:07.640 So, I asked
00:16:09.200 this question
00:16:09.820 and got shot
00:16:10.740 down today.
00:16:11.480 because I was
00:16:13.860 watching the news,
00:16:15.320 let's say the
00:16:15.920 social media news,
00:16:16.960 what is trending?
00:16:18.840 And it seemed
00:16:19.880 to me that
00:16:20.320 everything trending
00:16:21.120 lately is about
00:16:22.960 a man behaving
00:16:24.220 badly.
00:16:25.620 A man behaving
00:16:26.580 badly.
00:16:27.420 And I asked
00:16:28.020 the question,
00:16:28.820 are there any
00:16:30.260 women being
00:16:31.080 canceled or
00:16:32.460 is it all men?
00:16:34.120 And then, of course,
00:16:35.240 I immediately
00:16:35.940 learned that, yes,
00:16:36.940 there were many
00:16:37.380 women who got
00:16:37.980 canceled.
00:16:38.860 So, there was
00:16:39.340 Roseanne,
00:16:40.720 Gina Carano,
00:16:41.460 Laura Loomer,
00:16:42.780 J.K. Rowling,
00:16:44.100 Naomi Wolf,
00:16:45.020 list goes on.
00:16:46.760 But at the
00:16:47.140 moment, yeah,
00:16:48.780 Amber Heard,
00:16:49.600 somebody says,
00:16:50.400 I guess she got
00:16:51.080 canceled.
00:16:52.680 Liz Cheney,
00:16:53.700 maybe she got
00:16:54.260 canceled.
00:16:55.840 She-Hulk got
00:16:56.840 canceled.
00:17:00.780 Paula Deen,
00:17:02.000 yeah, okay.
00:17:02.440 However, at the
00:17:05.300 moment, there's
00:17:06.080 something else
00:17:06.580 going on.
00:17:08.120 So, at the
00:17:08.580 moment, these are
00:17:09.440 the names that
00:17:10.240 keep showing up
00:17:11.520 in trending
00:17:12.120 Twitter.
00:17:13.260 And they're
00:17:14.000 showing up in
00:17:15.040 terms of being
00:17:15.580 criticized.
00:17:17.760 So, you've got
00:17:19.040 your Jordan
00:17:19.540 Peterson, your
00:17:20.840 Joe Rogan, Alex
00:17:21.840 Jones, Elon Musk,
00:17:23.480 Andrew Taint,
00:17:25.060 Sam Harris,
00:17:26.940 Brett Weinstein,
00:17:27.700 and, you
00:17:31.020 know, at
00:17:31.360 various times.
00:17:32.140 You know, Brett
00:17:32.560 is not in the
00:17:33.380 news at the
00:17:33.980 moment.
00:17:34.740 But at various
00:17:35.380 times, they've
00:17:36.120 all been taken
00:17:36.620 on.
00:17:37.320 And here's the
00:17:38.000 one I'm
00:17:38.680 wondering about.
00:17:39.360 Does it feel
00:17:43.160 like they're
00:17:44.580 going after the
00:17:45.320 internet dads?
00:17:48.220 It's not, it's
00:17:49.080 not, it's not,
00:17:50.040 not T-A-I-N-T.
00:17:54.820 It's, it's
00:17:55.320 Andrew Taint, T-A-T-T-A-N-T.
00:18:00.580 If you're hearing
00:18:01.460 a difference, that's
00:18:02.240 one of those, that's
00:18:05.240 one of those Laurel
00:18:06.800 Yanni things.
00:18:08.200 You hear what you
00:18:08.820 want to say?
00:18:09.800 Because what I'm
00:18:10.360 saying is T-A-T-E.
00:18:13.960 Taint.
00:18:14.980 How does it
00:18:15.680 sound to you?
00:18:17.200 See, if you, if
00:18:17.980 you think it's the
00:18:18.680 other one, you hear
00:18:19.220 it that way.
00:18:20.500 Taint.
00:18:25.360 So here's my
00:18:26.220 question.
00:18:26.800 Do you think
00:18:27.300 there's something
00:18:29.100 about masculinity
00:18:31.220 that's maybe people
00:18:33.760 are afraid of?
00:18:34.520 Oh, my God, a lot of
00:18:41.900 you hear it as with
00:18:43.000 an N.
00:18:44.500 You're hearing it
00:18:45.280 that way?
00:18:45.640 That's funny.
00:18:46.760 Interesting.
00:18:51.840 All right.
00:18:53.980 I guess that, I
00:18:56.440 guess that wasn't
00:18:57.120 interesting.
00:18:57.520 is anything else
00:19:01.560 happening?
00:19:02.120 You know, August is
00:19:02.960 such a slow month.
00:19:03.880 So, Jordan Peterson is
00:19:13.340 getting a lot of heat
00:19:14.460 lately.
00:19:15.660 What do you think
00:19:16.300 about that?
00:19:16.820 Has Jordan Peterson
00:19:19.920 said anything that
00:19:20.840 hurts anybody?
00:19:22.440 Because he's getting
00:19:23.240 so much heat.
00:19:24.400 Now, a lot of it is
00:19:25.140 because he's, you
00:19:26.080 know, he's, he's
00:19:28.480 gotten emotional
00:19:29.280 during interviews.
00:19:32.100 And I do wonder
00:19:33.440 what's up with that.
00:19:34.360 To me, that looks
00:19:35.140 like health-related.
00:19:39.040 Possibly some meds
00:19:40.260 or something's going
00:19:41.540 on.
00:19:41.880 Makes him a little
00:19:42.380 more emotional.
00:19:43.000 But I hate judging
00:19:45.280 him for that.
00:19:47.560 Are we going to,
00:19:48.100 are we going to
00:19:48.600 judge Jordan Peterson
00:19:50.260 for being emotional?
00:19:52.680 Is that, does that
00:19:53.960 feel fair?
00:19:56.060 Like, who else are
00:19:57.220 you going to judge
00:19:57.760 for being emotional?
00:20:00.120 What about me?
00:20:02.220 You know, I, I've
00:20:03.440 shown you some
00:20:04.120 different looks here
00:20:05.920 because, you know,
00:20:06.980 this is live, so you
00:20:08.220 get what, you get
00:20:08.940 whatever you get.
00:20:10.700 I don't know.
00:20:11.780 It feels like a
00:20:12.440 little bit unfair,
00:20:13.280 doesn't it, to, to
00:20:16.400 accuse him of being
00:20:17.460 emotional when, in
00:20:19.060 fact, everything he
00:20:20.180 does is based on
00:20:21.020 emotion.
00:20:22.280 Now, when I say
00:20:23.080 everything he does is
00:20:23.920 based on emotion, I
00:20:24.880 don't mean that he's
00:20:25.680 irrational.
00:20:26.400 He's very rational.
00:20:27.920 He's highly pragmatic
00:20:29.220 and rational.
00:20:30.520 But, you can see that
00:20:32.040 he's driven by some
00:20:34.340 kind of emotional
00:20:35.260 impulses just like
00:20:38.140 everybody else.
00:20:39.580 Just like everybody
00:20:40.500 else.
00:20:40.860 So, here's what it
00:20:48.740 feels like.
00:20:49.320 Here's what it feels
00:20:50.080 like to me.
00:20:51.140 It feels like the
00:20:53.080 people on the left
00:20:54.660 or the people who,
00:20:56.700 maybe the, the
00:20:57.460 grand manipulators,
00:20:58.760 whoever they are,
00:20:59.800 have decided that
00:21:00.840 there are certain
00:21:01.640 internet personalities
00:21:03.200 who have too much
00:21:04.260 influence.
00:21:05.340 influence.
00:21:06.560 So, what it looks
00:21:07.700 to me is that the,
00:21:09.100 the people coming
00:21:11.560 after everybody from
00:21:12.880 Joe Rogan to
00:21:15.720 Andrew Taint,
00:21:17.620 T-A-T,
00:21:19.060 Taint,
00:21:20.040 they're all trying to
00:21:21.820 reduce their influence.
00:21:23.500 You know, there are
00:21:23.960 plenty of legitimate
00:21:25.040 reasons to go after
00:21:27.260 Alex Jones.
00:21:28.160 He gives you
00:21:30.040 legitimate reasons,
00:21:31.240 but I don't think
00:21:31.820 that's the reason.
00:21:33.640 You know, obviously
00:21:34.180 the Sandy Hook
00:21:34.880 people have a good
00:21:35.640 reason.
00:21:36.440 But, for the, the
00:21:37.760 people who are
00:21:38.220 piling on, I don't
00:21:39.240 think it's so much
00:21:39.980 about Sandy Hook.
00:21:41.400 You know, obviously
00:21:42.020 some of it is.
00:21:43.180 But, I feel like
00:21:43.880 it's reducing
00:21:44.820 influence.
00:21:46.480 Because, if you're
00:21:47.360 a Democrat, the
00:21:48.240 last thing you want
00:21:49.140 is for Joe Rogan
00:21:50.140 to have influence.
00:21:51.880 Right?
00:21:52.620 And you want to,
00:21:53.440 you want to make
00:21:54.020 sure he has less
00:21:54.780 influence before the
00:21:55.740 actual voting starts
00:21:56.860 for 2022 and 2024.
00:21:59.360 So, I feel like a
00:22:00.400 lot of this is to
00:22:01.140 take, to take
00:22:02.280 players off the
00:22:03.360 board for election
00:22:05.940 reasons going
00:22:06.860 forward.
00:22:07.520 That's what it
00:22:08.160 feels like.
00:22:08.860 It feels like players
00:22:10.020 being taken off the
00:22:11.020 board.
00:22:12.940 And, you know
00:22:15.080 they're coming from
00:22:15.780 me, right?
00:22:18.080 Are you all
00:22:19.060 waiting for that?
00:22:19.740 Because, I feel like
00:22:21.280 a number of people
00:22:22.200 have taken a run
00:22:24.000 at it, but nothing
00:22:24.880 organized or
00:22:25.960 professional yet.
00:22:27.660 So, so far it's
00:22:28.440 like individuals and
00:22:29.740 smaller publications
00:22:30.840 and stuff.
00:22:31.840 But, you won't
00:22:33.180 know that they came
00:22:33.980 after me until you
00:22:34.780 see something in the
00:22:35.820 Wall Street Journal.
00:22:38.920 Probably more likely
00:22:40.000 there than the
00:22:40.600 Washington Post.
00:22:42.100 Do you know why
00:22:42.560 the Washington Post
00:22:43.300 is less likely to
00:22:44.440 write a hit piece
00:22:45.200 on me?
00:22:46.820 Guess.
00:22:47.880 Why is the
00:22:48.420 Washington Post
00:22:49.200 the least likely
00:22:50.280 to write a hit
00:22:50.980 piece on me?
00:22:54.560 Because they run
00:22:55.360 Dilbert.
00:22:56.360 They run Dilbert.
00:22:57.920 It's one of their
00:22:58.740 biggest comics.
00:23:00.580 Now, it doesn't
00:23:01.540 stop me from
00:23:02.160 criticizing them.
00:23:03.880 And do you know
00:23:04.420 why I don't get
00:23:05.200 kicked out of the
00:23:05.840 Washington Post
00:23:06.520 even though I
00:23:07.180 criticize them?
00:23:09.280 Guess why?
00:23:10.660 Why does Dilbert
00:23:11.400 not get kicked out
00:23:12.380 of the Washington
00:23:13.060 Post even though I
00:23:14.040 viciously criticize
00:23:15.360 them?
00:23:15.720 Well, you're
00:23:18.860 going to be
00:23:19.100 surprised at my
00:23:19.840 answer.
00:23:22.140 It's because
00:23:23.000 newspaper editors
00:23:24.380 have balls.
00:23:26.020 Both the men and
00:23:26.900 the women.
00:23:27.420 We're speaking
00:23:27.800 hypothetical or
00:23:31.600 metaphorical balls
00:23:33.440 here.
00:23:33.660 Yeah.
00:23:35.000 Newspapers are the
00:23:36.780 last bastion of
00:23:38.060 free speech.
00:23:40.060 You know, even
00:23:40.860 though they have
00:23:41.300 their issues.
00:23:42.580 Newspapers will
00:23:43.360 run unpopular
00:23:44.160 stuff.
00:23:45.560 So a newspaper
00:23:46.100 will let you be
00:23:47.420 content at the
00:23:48.940 same time you
00:23:49.640 are criticizing
00:23:50.500 them.
00:23:51.160 Free speech.
00:23:52.480 Believe it or
00:23:53.280 not, it's a good
00:23:54.080 reason.
00:23:56.500 There is
00:23:57.780 something about
00:23:59.220 the newspapers
00:23:59.840 that will allow
00:24:00.720 you a little bit
00:24:01.620 more leeway.
00:24:06.860 And I appreciate
00:24:07.640 that.
00:24:08.240 I think that's
00:24:09.040 worth calling out.
00:24:09.800 But the New
00:24:11.300 York Times does
00:24:11.980 not run
00:24:12.400 Dilbert.
00:24:14.300 Bloomberg does
00:24:15.800 not run
00:24:16.260 Dilbert.
00:24:16.680 So Bloomberg
00:24:17.120 tried to take
00:24:18.280 me out during
00:24:19.280 the 2016
00:24:20.160 election run.
00:24:21.400 They did a
00:24:21.760 big hit piece
00:24:22.300 on me.
00:24:23.460 And I'm
00:24:24.700 expecting another
00:24:25.480 one because that
00:24:26.180 one's kind of
00:24:26.680 aged.
00:24:28.580 And it can't
00:24:29.560 be a small
00:24:30.120 publication because
00:24:31.100 that wouldn't
00:24:31.400 make enough
00:24:31.820 difference.
00:24:32.620 So it's got to
00:24:33.360 be something
00:24:33.900 national and
00:24:35.480 something that
00:24:36.060 Dilbert is not
00:24:37.200 a client of.
00:24:39.800 Or vice
00:24:40.400 versa.
00:24:42.720 Yeah, Business
00:24:43.340 Insider would
00:24:44.260 be sort of
00:24:45.000 the little
00:24:45.900 attack dog
00:24:47.800 of Bezos.
00:24:53.300 Newspapers are
00:24:54.060 less sensitive
00:24:54.680 to clicks.
00:24:55.900 Well, most of
00:24:57.340 the newspapers
00:24:57.720 are online as
00:24:58.720 well.
00:25:02.080 CNN?
00:25:02.600 I don't
00:25:04.080 think CNN
00:25:04.660 will do it
00:25:05.480 because it
00:25:07.200 doesn't, I
00:25:08.300 don't know if
00:25:08.620 CNN would have
00:25:09.240 enough kick.
00:25:10.340 The Atlantic.
00:25:11.260 Maybe the
00:25:11.760 Atlantic.
00:25:13.200 Yeah.
00:25:14.740 Possibly the
00:25:15.540 Atlantic.
00:25:16.880 But the
00:25:18.500 odds that
00:25:19.140 there's nobody
00:25:19.800 assigned to
00:25:20.780 write a
00:25:21.100 hit piece on
00:25:21.640 me right now
00:25:22.260 are very low.
00:25:24.180 What do you
00:25:24.840 think?
00:25:25.200 What are the
00:25:25.920 odds that no
00:25:27.300 one anywhere at
00:25:28.060 a major publication
00:25:29.000 has been assigned
00:25:29.980 or has
00:25:31.020 volunteered to
00:25:32.480 do a hit
00:25:32.940 piece on me?
00:25:34.620 It's pretty low.
00:25:36.480 Yeah, somebody's
00:25:37.080 coming for me.
00:25:38.120 And the reason
00:25:38.720 would be that
00:25:39.440 if they think I
00:25:41.340 have any
00:25:42.000 influence over
00:25:42.660 anything.
00:25:42.980 you're not
00:25:52.060 worthy.
00:25:53.500 Maybe not.
00:25:54.940 Maybe not.
00:25:56.520 That's right.
00:25:57.200 I'm the rogue
00:25:57.720 cartoonist.
00:26:00.560 So my
00:26:01.460 comics about
00:26:02.320 ESG
00:26:03.100 are in the
00:26:04.700 pipeline.
00:26:05.500 So you're not
00:26:06.040 going to see
00:26:06.360 those until
00:26:07.140 later in
00:26:08.500 September.
00:26:08.960 But remember,
00:26:12.940 I have until
00:26:13.360 the end of
00:26:13.780 the year I
00:26:14.180 promised you
00:26:14.720 to get rid
00:26:15.280 of ESG.
00:26:19.480 Do I have
00:26:20.040 a dead man
00:26:20.580 switch?
00:26:23.400 Is that
00:26:24.440 where I
00:26:24.740 release all
00:26:25.380 the good
00:26:25.760 secrets?
00:26:26.900 Now that
00:26:27.320 would be a
00:26:27.780 good idea.
00:26:29.700 Wouldn't that
00:26:30.260 be a good
00:26:30.600 idea?
00:26:31.540 Do you have
00:26:31.920 any idea how
00:26:32.580 much stuff I
00:26:33.160 know that
00:26:34.640 would be a
00:26:35.900 bad idea if
00:26:36.520 it ever
00:26:36.760 became public?
00:26:39.920 It's quite a
00:26:40.740 bit.
00:26:43.200 But nothing
00:26:44.580 that I need
00:26:45.100 to get out
00:26:45.580 especially.
00:26:56.000 Better release
00:26:57.020 it to locals
00:26:58.140 first.
00:26:58.700 Yeah.
00:27:02.200 Yeah,
00:27:02.760 McAfee said
00:27:03.460 he had a
00:27:03.820 dead man
00:27:04.200 switch but
00:27:04.700 nothing happened.
00:27:05.760 Or did it?
00:27:07.540 Maybe McAfee's
00:27:08.820 dead man
00:27:09.380 switch is not
00:27:10.060 one that
00:27:10.360 you're supposed
00:27:10.700 to know
00:27:11.420 is happening.
00:27:13.000 Maybe just
00:27:13.740 something is
00:27:14.220 happening.
00:27:14.720 You never
00:27:15.000 know.
00:27:19.860 Yeah,
00:27:20.420 most dead
00:27:20.940 man switches
00:27:21.400 don't work.
00:27:26.400 Hoover,
00:27:27.060 blackmail,
00:27:27.660 JFK,
00:27:28.600 allegedly.
00:27:30.620 What's the
00:27:31.240 most harmful
00:27:31.720 thing you
00:27:32.240 know?
00:27:32.500 That's a
00:27:35.180 good question.
00:27:36.200 What's the
00:27:36.520 most harmful
00:27:37.160 thing I
00:27:37.700 know that
00:27:38.280 you don't
00:27:38.720 know?
00:27:39.560 I don't
00:27:40.000 know that
00:27:40.260 any of it's
00:27:40.620 harmful.
00:27:42.220 Probably none
00:27:43.260 of it makes
00:27:43.660 any.
00:27:43.840 If it were
00:27:44.220 harmful, I
00:27:45.000 probably would
00:27:45.780 have told you
00:27:46.260 by now.
00:27:48.220 A lot of it
00:27:48.940 is just how
00:27:49.420 you understand
00:27:50.000 the world.
00:27:51.340 There are a
00:27:51.680 lot of things
00:27:52.220 that you just
00:27:52.940 think are one
00:27:53.940 way that
00:27:54.400 really,
00:27:54.780 really isn't.
00:27:55.640 how many
00:27:59.420 people do
00:27:59.880 you think
00:28:00.160 know the
00:28:01.640 truth of
00:28:02.420 Epstein's
00:28:03.200 death?
00:28:06.260 How many
00:28:06.940 people alive
00:28:08.220 do you think
00:28:08.600 know the
00:28:09.160 truth?
00:28:13.340 Now, that
00:28:14.040 one I don't
00:28:14.560 know.
00:28:15.880 But I can
00:28:16.500 tell you I've
00:28:17.340 heard theories
00:28:18.180 that you
00:28:18.620 haven't heard.
00:28:20.520 But I don't
00:28:21.100 know.
00:28:21.700 I have no
00:28:22.320 way to know
00:28:22.700 what's credible
00:28:23.260 in that.
00:28:24.140 But I've
00:28:24.500 definitely heard
00:28:25.000 things you
00:28:25.380 haven't
00:28:25.620 heard.
00:28:26.640 So that's
00:28:27.440 all I
00:28:27.700 know.
00:28:29.520 But I
00:28:30.060 wouldn't
00:28:30.240 repeat them
00:28:30.760 because I
00:28:31.140 have no
00:28:31.660 way to
00:28:32.160 validate
00:28:33.640 them.
00:28:35.680 Yeah, there's
00:28:36.340 got to be,
00:28:36.920 I think there
00:28:37.460 are at least
00:28:37.780 100 people
00:28:38.580 who know
00:28:39.120 exactly what
00:28:39.960 happened with
00:28:40.520 Epstein.
00:28:41.480 Because if
00:28:42.100 only two or
00:28:42.760 three or
00:28:43.380 whatever knew
00:28:44.620 at some
00:28:46.380 point, that
00:28:47.240 two or three
00:28:47.800 are definitely
00:28:48.260 talking.
00:28:48.620 them.
00:28:55.300 You can't
00:28:55.940 wait to die
00:28:56.460 because you
00:28:56.760 have such
00:28:57.080 a good
00:28:57.320 dead man's
00:28:57.800 witch.
00:28:59.560 The theory
00:29:00.360 on why
00:29:00.800 no prosecutions,
00:29:01.900 it's obvious.
00:29:03.900 It's obvious.
00:29:05.040 There are
00:29:05.340 important people
00:29:06.220 who would be
00:29:06.660 prosecuted.
00:29:08.260 I would say
00:29:08.700 that's obvious.
00:29:09.980 It's exactly
00:29:10.640 what it looks
00:29:11.140 like.
00:29:12.080 Sometimes
00:29:12.480 things are
00:29:13.100 exactly what
00:29:13.740 they look
00:29:14.060 like.
00:29:15.260 And it
00:29:15.780 looks like
00:29:16.980 powerful people
00:29:18.800 are being
00:29:19.180 protected.
00:29:20.080 It's probably
00:29:20.880 exactly that.
00:29:24.180 Yeah, and
00:29:24.780 what difference
00:29:25.240 does it make?
00:29:25.840 I don't know.
00:29:29.840 All right.
00:29:34.620 NATO shape.
00:29:36.720 What's that
00:29:37.340 mean?
00:29:42.220 Milo Yiannopoulos
00:29:43.300 has been going
00:29:43.820 in a long
00:29:44.120 time?
00:29:44.600 Yes, he
00:29:44.900 has.
00:29:49.020 But with
00:29:49.600 100,
00:29:50.120 could there
00:29:50.420 be a
00:29:50.700 whistleblower?
00:29:52.820 Well,
00:29:54.020 you know,
00:29:56.640 I think it's
00:29:57.480 going to come
00:29:57.800 out eventually,
00:29:58.760 don't you?
00:30:03.760 Why did
00:30:04.360 Epstein not
00:30:05.080 have a
00:30:06.760 kill switch?
00:30:08.720 A dead
00:30:09.280 man switch?
00:30:09.920 I think
00:30:10.420 Epstein's
00:30:11.080 dead man
00:30:11.580 switch worked.
00:30:12.360 didn't
00:30:14.060 it?
00:30:15.360 Because the
00:30:16.240 fact that
00:30:18.400 those names
00:30:20.300 didn't come
00:30:20.780 out tells me
00:30:21.520 that something
00:30:22.100 happened behind
00:30:22.880 the scenes.
00:30:30.300 Yeah, well,
00:30:31.320 I don't know.
00:30:32.640 Do we know
00:30:33.120 the Jimmy Hoffa
00:30:33.820 thing yet or
00:30:34.360 no?
00:30:34.540 yeah,
00:30:41.220 Ghislaine got
00:30:42.060 convicted of
00:30:43.260 transporting
00:30:43.800 children to
00:30:44.480 no one
00:30:44.920 effectively.
00:30:50.120 Obama had
00:30:50.860 affairs,
00:30:51.380 somebody's
00:30:51.720 asking?
00:30:52.240 I don't
00:30:52.820 know about
00:30:53.200 any of
00:30:53.460 that.
00:30:53.740 but I
00:30:59.000 do think
00:30:59.700 some
00:31:00.000 Obama
00:31:01.380 surprises
00:31:02.020 are in
00:31:02.520 the
00:31:02.660 future.
00:31:10.560 This is
00:31:11.180 where you
00:31:11.460 come for
00:31:11.860 the best
00:31:12.320 and the
00:31:12.660 worst
00:31:12.900 takes.
00:31:13.760 All right,
00:31:14.080 let me ask
00:31:14.460 you this.
00:31:15.160 What's the
00:31:15.800 worst take
00:31:16.680 you've ever
00:31:17.200 seen me
00:31:17.660 take?
00:31:19.160 The worst
00:31:20.020 take I've
00:31:20.740 ever had.
00:31:21.160 And I
00:31:24.180 think it
00:31:24.440 will be
00:31:24.640 different on
00:31:25.380 what's my
00:31:27.600 worst take?
00:31:30.900 Vaccinations?
00:31:32.120 Now, you
00:31:32.960 do know that
00:31:33.480 on vaccinations
00:31:34.200 I have not
00:31:34.860 been proven
00:31:35.340 wrong,
00:31:35.840 right?
00:31:38.140 So my
00:31:38.880 worst take
00:31:39.740 I have not
00:31:40.180 been proven
00:31:40.620 wrong.
00:31:43.460 Right?
00:31:44.240 Because my
00:31:44.680 take is that
00:31:45.280 the vaccinations
00:31:46.160 would not
00:31:47.100 prevent.
00:31:49.320 I was
00:31:49.980 right.
00:31:51.160 that
00:31:51.680 therapeutics
00:31:52.340 would be
00:31:52.640 important.
00:31:53.580 I was
00:31:54.020 right.
00:31:55.720 And that
00:31:56.460 if I
00:31:56.920 personally
00:31:57.420 got the
00:31:58.120 vaccination,
00:31:59.480 I could
00:31:59.940 travel,
00:32:01.160 but chances
00:32:01.740 are I
00:32:02.080 wouldn't
00:32:02.280 have an
00:32:02.680 adverse
00:32:03.060 effect.
00:32:04.100 And I
00:32:04.780 traveled,
00:32:05.680 and I
00:32:06.060 did not
00:32:06.380 have an
00:32:06.700 adverse
00:32:07.000 effect.
00:32:10.120 I would
00:32:10.760 say that
00:32:11.140 everything I
00:32:11.740 did was
00:32:12.320 right for
00:32:12.820 me,
00:32:13.760 in the
00:32:15.780 sense that
00:32:16.240 I did
00:32:16.600 not encounter
00:32:17.300 a problem
00:32:17.800 yet.
00:32:18.200 now if
00:32:19.340 you're
00:32:19.540 going to
00:32:19.700 say,
00:32:20.000 but Scott,
00:32:21.260 what about
00:32:21.980 that risk
00:32:22.520 of the
00:32:22.860 vaccination
00:32:23.300 will kill
00:32:23.840 you later?
00:32:24.820 Well,
00:32:25.300 then you'd
00:32:25.840 be right.
00:32:26.960 Then you
00:32:27.520 would be
00:32:27.780 right.
00:32:29.060 Wait and
00:32:29.600 see.
00:32:31.220 The
00:32:31.640 slaughter
00:32:31.960 meter?
00:32:33.060 Well,
00:32:33.660 the
00:32:33.820 slaughter
00:32:34.140 meter,
00:32:34.880 if you're
00:32:37.040 talking about
00:32:37.680 2020,
00:32:40.080 you've
00:32:41.200 made a
00:32:41.520 big assumption
00:32:42.100 that the
00:32:43.140 election went
00:32:43.940 the way
00:32:44.460 a normal
00:32:49.200 election should
00:32:50.000 go.
00:32:51.580 I don't
00:32:52.240 think anything
00:32:52.640 like that
00:32:53.060 happened.
00:32:53.900 I think
00:32:54.280 that what
00:32:54.540 happened was
00:32:55.140 that at
00:32:55.580 the very
00:32:55.900 least,
00:32:56.900 the rules
00:32:57.540 were gamed
00:32:58.300 in a legal
00:32:58.900 way,
00:33:00.040 so that any
00:33:00.800 prediction
00:33:01.220 could not
00:33:02.560 have really
00:33:02.880 taken that
00:33:03.380 into account.
00:33:06.740 The Sam
00:33:07.500 Harris defense?
00:33:09.300 No,
00:33:09.900 that's not
00:33:10.260 my worst
00:33:10.660 take.
00:33:12.100 All right.
00:33:17.580 The
00:33:17.740 simulation,
00:33:18.860 well,
00:33:19.380 it's a
00:33:19.740 trillion to
00:33:20.240 want I'm
00:33:20.540 right about
00:33:20.920 that.
00:33:27.660 Zelensky
00:33:28.140 wins with
00:33:28.680 the drones?
00:33:29.280 I think I
00:33:29.780 was right
00:33:30.160 on Ukraine.
00:33:32.060 Do you
00:33:32.580 think I
00:33:32.840 was wrong
00:33:33.220 on Ukraine?
00:33:34.040 I feel
00:33:34.600 like I
00:33:34.920 had the
00:33:35.260 most right
00:33:36.120 prediction
00:33:36.700 on Ukraine
00:33:37.360 of anybody
00:33:38.000 in public.
00:33:40.020 Because I
00:33:40.700 said that
00:33:41.320 Russia,
00:33:42.100 Russia could
00:33:42.460 not conquer
00:33:43.240 Ukraine,
00:33:44.840 and that
00:33:45.420 if Ukraine
00:33:46.040 had enough
00:33:46.680 weapons,
00:33:47.200 they could
00:33:47.420 even push
00:33:48.000 Russia back
00:33:48.760 to some
00:33:50.340 other.
00:33:51.180 And at
00:33:51.940 the moment,
00:33:52.560 Russia is
00:33:53.060 deadlocked.
00:33:54.960 Weapons
00:33:55.520 depots are
00:33:56.560 being destroyed.
00:33:58.460 I don't know.
00:33:59.540 I would say
00:34:00.560 that even
00:34:01.100 being slightly
00:34:02.020 wrong,
00:34:03.260 I had the
00:34:03.820 rightest
00:34:04.260 prediction
00:34:04.680 that Ukraine
00:34:05.820 would do a
00:34:06.400 better job
00:34:06.860 of defending
00:34:07.380 than the
00:34:08.080 experts said.
00:34:08.680 I would
00:34:10.100 say that's
00:34:10.380 one of
00:34:10.600 my best
00:34:10.980 takes.
00:34:14.740 Release the
00:34:15.400 Kraken.
00:34:16.040 The release
00:34:16.760 the Kraken
00:34:17.280 thing was
00:34:18.340 clearly wrong.
00:34:21.180 And let
00:34:21.420 me say,
00:34:22.220 I was going
00:34:22.900 to talk
00:34:23.180 about that
00:34:23.560 actually,
00:34:24.180 because I
00:34:24.700 think in
00:34:25.540 my wrongness
00:34:26.300 there's
00:34:26.600 something to
00:34:27.120 learn there.
00:34:28.560 Do you
00:34:28.900 remember there
00:34:30.140 was a time
00:34:30.660 when Sidney
00:34:31.360 Powell got
00:34:31.940 involved in
00:34:32.760 the election
00:34:33.200 stuff,
00:34:33.640 and she
00:34:34.720 was coming
00:34:35.240 off her
00:34:35.880 good reputation
00:34:36.980 with General
00:34:38.660 Flynn.
00:34:40.400 And people
00:34:41.300 were talking
00:34:41.880 about her,
00:34:42.460 at least people
00:34:42.980 on the right,
00:34:44.080 were talking
00:34:44.540 about Sidney
00:34:45.120 Powell as
00:34:45.700 sort of a
00:34:46.380 godlike
00:34:47.280 legal figure,
00:34:49.160 a very high
00:34:49.940 level operating
00:34:51.300 legal person.
00:34:52.900 Now, I
00:34:53.400 believed that
00:34:54.080 because I
00:34:57.380 didn't hear
00:34:57.740 anybody say
00:34:58.340 the opposite.
00:34:59.820 There was
00:35:00.320 nobody saying,
00:35:01.340 well, you
00:35:02.300 know, she's
00:35:02.660 not really a
00:35:03.280 real lawyer,
00:35:04.620 she got her
00:35:05.140 law degree
00:35:06.200 in the mail,
00:35:07.920 nothing like
00:35:08.500 that.
00:35:09.780 So if you
00:35:10.600 take the
00:35:11.020 assumption that
00:35:11.700 this is a
00:35:12.280 real high
00:35:13.040 level lawyer,
00:35:14.520 and that
00:35:14.940 real high
00:35:15.500 level lawyer
00:35:16.060 says, I
00:35:16.620 have the
00:35:17.020 goods and
00:35:17.540 I'm going
00:35:17.800 to show
00:35:18.060 them to
00:35:18.320 you, and
00:35:18.640 it's really,
00:35:19.240 really important,
00:35:20.500 you do
00:35:21.800 expect that
00:35:22.400 they have
00:35:22.700 the goods.
00:35:24.320 But here's
00:35:25.100 where I was
00:35:25.620 completely
00:35:26.200 wrong.
00:35:28.680 Sidney
00:35:29.200 Powell's
00:35:29.640 reputation
00:35:30.240 seems to
00:35:30.980 be not
00:35:32.220 exactly
00:35:33.260 matching
00:35:35.040 her actual
00:35:36.320 reality.
00:35:38.400 And I
00:35:39.160 got that
00:35:39.600 completely
00:35:40.060 wrong.
00:35:41.540 Now, that
00:35:41.980 was surprising.
00:35:43.580 That was
00:35:43.900 surprising.
00:35:44.680 Because when
00:35:45.320 I heard the
00:35:46.160 Venezuelan
00:35:48.420 hacking stuff,
00:35:49.780 I knew that
00:35:50.660 was fake the
00:35:51.420 minute I
00:35:51.780 heard it.
00:35:53.640 Do you
00:35:54.220 remember that?
00:35:55.300 So, to
00:35:57.200 my slight
00:35:58.320 credit,
00:35:58.820 it, and
00:36:00.820 let's see if
00:36:01.520 you can
00:36:01.820 handle this
00:36:02.740 nuance.
00:36:04.100 I was 100%
00:36:05.320 wrong that
00:36:06.180 the Kraken
00:36:06.780 would be a
00:36:07.460 real thing,
00:36:08.660 but I was
00:36:10.740 100% right
00:36:11.960 when I heard
00:36:12.860 what the
00:36:13.220 Kraken was
00:36:14.000 that I
00:36:14.600 called
00:36:14.820 bullshit on
00:36:15.480 it.
00:36:16.940 As soon as I
00:36:17.740 heard the
00:36:18.040 Venezuelan
00:36:18.880 general
00:36:19.540 stuff, I
00:36:21.500 said, oh,
00:36:21.880 no, no, I'm
00:36:22.560 out, I'm
00:36:23.140 out, that's
00:36:23.640 not true.
00:36:24.780 That's not
00:36:25.400 true.
00:36:26.880 Now, I'm
00:36:29.160 guessing that
00:36:30.660 Sidney Powell
00:36:31.200 got conned,
00:36:32.200 as somebody
00:36:32.680 just said.
00:36:33.360 I think that
00:36:33.920 somebody who
00:36:34.440 was good at
00:36:35.220 conning got
00:36:37.260 to her.
00:36:39.320 But still,
00:36:41.140 but still, I
00:36:42.180 don't think I
00:36:42.720 would have
00:36:42.940 believed it if
00:36:43.640 I'd been in
00:36:44.120 that situation.
00:36:45.660 I might have
00:36:46.480 played it
00:36:47.360 differently and
00:36:47.960 said something
00:36:48.460 like, well,
00:36:50.120 we've got some
00:36:50.620 really interesting
00:36:51.240 leads, but we
00:36:52.940 don't want to
00:36:53.400 tell you about
00:36:54.000 it until we
00:36:54.500 track them
00:36:55.260 down.
00:36:57.720 So I did
00:36:58.680 not know that
00:36:59.500 she was not
00:37:00.580 operating at
00:37:01.300 the high level.
00:37:02.580 And so I
00:37:03.120 was completely
00:37:03.620 wrong.
00:37:04.820 So I did
00:37:05.540 trust that she
00:37:06.320 would be able
00:37:06.840 to vet
00:37:07.340 information, but
00:37:09.000 that was easy
00:37:10.100 to vet.
00:37:11.120 That one was
00:37:11.660 easy.
00:37:12.940 You could just
00:37:13.480 hear it and
00:37:14.020 go, no, no,
00:37:15.460 that's not
00:37:15.880 true.
00:37:18.140 So, yes.
00:37:19.860 So that, if
00:37:21.160 I were to make
00:37:22.800 my own list
00:37:23.700 of things
00:37:24.940 that I was
00:37:25.660 most wrong
00:37:26.540 about, I
00:37:27.100 would put the
00:37:27.660 Kraken at
00:37:28.320 the top of
00:37:28.780 my list.
00:37:32.240 Similar to
00:37:32.840 how I got
00:37:33.320 conned by
00:37:34.440 Peter Thiel,
00:37:35.160 what would
00:37:35.460 be an
00:37:35.740 example of
00:37:36.280 that?
00:37:37.620 In what
00:37:38.020 way did
00:37:38.460 Peter Thiel
00:37:39.360 con me?
00:37:40.500 I don't
00:37:40.860 even know
00:37:41.080 what the
00:37:41.280 topic is.
00:37:42.560 What did
00:37:42.980 Peter Thiel
00:37:43.480 say that
00:37:44.220 I bought
00:37:46.900 into?
00:37:47.180 You'd be
00:37:57.480 hunted.
00:38:00.080 Well, I
00:38:00.860 think most
00:38:01.260 people accept
00:38:02.980 that hunted
00:38:03.640 has actually
00:38:04.560 happened.
00:38:12.640 Well, you
00:38:13.280 remember you're
00:38:14.020 adding the
00:38:14.540 literally.
00:38:14.880 I said
00:38:16.700 Republicans
00:38:17.220 would be
00:38:17.700 hunted, and
00:38:20.020 Republicans say
00:38:21.180 that that's
00:38:21.640 happened.
00:38:22.960 You added a
00:38:24.440 new word,
00:38:25.180 literally, to
00:38:26.780 make it look
00:38:27.260 like they're
00:38:27.640 wearing hunting
00:38:28.560 outfits and
00:38:29.400 rifles.
00:38:30.700 So you had
00:38:31.460 to add a
00:38:31.980 word to
00:38:32.380 make me
00:38:32.720 wrong.
00:38:34.760 You see
00:38:35.480 that if you
00:38:36.680 had to add
00:38:37.960 a word to
00:38:38.480 what I
00:38:38.760 said, and
00:38:39.820 it's the
00:38:40.220 added word
00:38:40.960 that makes
00:38:41.380 me wrong,
00:38:42.640 that's not
00:38:43.320 really my
00:38:43.760 problem.
00:38:44.080 If you
00:38:45.260 thought
00:38:45.560 hunted meant
00:38:46.500 literally like
00:38:49.060 that rascally
00:38:49.880 wabbit, you
00:38:51.020 know, Elmer
00:38:51.720 Fudd, and
00:38:52.320 he'd have
00:38:52.700 like a
00:38:53.000 shotgun, if
00:38:54.180 that's what
00:38:54.500 you thought
00:38:54.820 the tweet
00:38:55.240 meant, I'm
00:38:55.700 not sure
00:38:56.000 that's my
00:38:56.480 responsibility,
00:38:57.020 is it, if
00:38:58.260 you took
00:38:58.560 that literally?
00:39:02.160 But it's
00:39:02.740 been totally
00:39:03.220 true, yeah,
00:39:04.220 in a
00:39:04.800 metaphorical
00:39:05.400 sense.
00:39:05.720 All right,
00:39:10.200 well, you
00:39:10.560 don't have
00:39:10.880 too many, so
00:39:12.480 so far your
00:39:13.420 criticisms of
00:39:14.700 me are
00:39:15.180 either misinformed
00:39:16.740 or the ones
00:39:17.320 I agree
00:39:17.720 with, so I
00:39:18.680 think we're
00:39:19.040 largely on
00:39:19.860 the same
00:39:20.180 page, except
00:39:20.820 for the
00:39:21.120 things you
00:39:21.440 were
00:39:21.660 imagining.
00:39:27.460 You
00:39:27.980 suggested
00:39:29.060 that the
00:39:29.780 Kraken was
00:39:30.480 irrefutable
00:39:31.100 data analysis.
00:39:32.080 yes, well, I
00:39:36.500 didn't say
00:39:36.820 irrefutable, but
00:39:37.680 again, you're
00:39:38.300 adding, you
00:39:38.840 had to add a
00:39:39.440 word, didn't
00:39:39.920 you?
00:39:40.720 Do you notice
00:39:41.260 how people have
00:39:41.840 to add words
00:39:42.740 to make me
00:39:43.300 wrong?
00:39:44.440 I never would
00:39:45.220 have said
00:39:45.560 irrefutable.
00:39:47.300 If I'd said
00:39:48.140 that, I would
00:39:48.600 be wrong.
00:39:50.060 But the
00:39:51.420 data analysis
00:39:52.160 did show
00:39:52.860 great
00:39:53.280 irregularities.
00:39:55.240 In my
00:39:55.920 opinion, those
00:39:57.140 irregularities do
00:39:58.280 in fact make
00:40:00.880 the case.
00:40:02.080 But since I
00:40:03.600 don't want to
00:40:04.000 be banned
00:40:04.460 from social
00:40:05.040 media, I
00:40:05.780 will say
00:40:06.260 unambiguously,
00:40:07.920 no court has
00:40:08.780 found any
00:40:09.260 fraud this
00:40:09.740 big enough.
00:40:10.920 The parts
00:40:11.600 that worry
00:40:11.980 me are the
00:40:12.900 places that
00:40:14.440 were reliably
00:40:15.420 voted one
00:40:16.220 way and then
00:40:16.900 they went a
00:40:17.720 different way.
00:40:19.300 To me, those
00:40:20.240 are convincing
00:40:21.380 signals that
00:40:23.520 something was
00:40:24.340 up that we
00:40:25.340 don't understand.
00:40:26.640 Doesn't mean
00:40:27.280 the election
00:40:27.680 was rigged.
00:40:29.580 Doesn't mean
00:40:30.080 that.
00:40:30.380 And there's
00:40:31.260 no proof
00:40:32.200 of that.
00:40:33.580 But those
00:40:34.340 irregularities to
00:40:35.440 me are
00:40:36.360 unexplained
00:40:38.200 even now.
00:40:41.680 You
00:40:42.360 literally said
00:40:43.160 literally.
00:40:45.840 I think I'd
00:40:46.820 have to see
00:40:47.240 that.
00:40:52.340 Give me my
00:40:53.540 exact proof
00:40:54.620 so I may be
00:40:55.260 talking about
00:40:55.700 two different
00:40:56.140 things.
00:40:58.240 Tell me my
00:40:59.020 exact statement
00:40:59.700 and then I'll
00:41:00.460 tell you if
00:41:01.240 we're talking
00:41:01.880 about the
00:41:02.160 same thing.
00:41:06.940 Because that
00:41:07.540 doesn't, it's
00:41:08.240 not the way I
00:41:08.780 talk.
00:41:09.340 I wouldn't use
00:41:09.940 literally in that
00:41:10.900 context the one
00:41:11.900 you're talking
00:41:12.340 about.
00:41:13.000 But I may have
00:41:13.560 used it in some
00:41:14.180 other context.
00:41:15.060 Covington kids
00:41:21.760 being a-holes.
00:41:23.780 Yeah, I was
00:41:24.300 wrong about that
00:41:25.080 for 24 hours.
00:41:29.740 I don't know.
00:41:30.780 Do you think
00:41:32.620 that if somebody's
00:41:33.760 wrong for 24
00:41:34.760 hours and they
00:41:35.640 immediately correct,
00:41:37.900 is that a bad
00:41:39.060 take?
00:41:39.400 because we're
00:41:42.220 all wrong in
00:41:42.780 the first 48
00:41:43.500 hours.
00:41:44.840 Pretty much
00:41:45.440 everybody's wrong
00:41:46.200 on day one
00:41:47.040 because nobody
00:41:48.520 knows anything.
00:41:49.940 So I would
00:41:51.060 agree that's
00:41:51.500 wrong, but if
00:41:52.260 you were to
00:41:52.640 rank the
00:41:53.320 Covington kids
00:41:54.180 wrongness,
00:41:55.840 that'd be like
00:41:56.380 a 1 out of
00:41:56.980 10.
00:41:57.980 But definitely
00:41:58.540 wrong.
00:41:59.580 Like I'm not
00:42:00.260 saying it was
00:42:00.660 right, it was
00:42:01.160 completely wrong.
00:42:02.320 But in terms of
00:42:03.220 its importance,
00:42:04.500 1 out of
00:42:05.020 10.
00:42:05.200 1 out of 10.
00:42:05.240 1 out of 10.
00:42:05.260 1 out of 10.
00:42:09.400 If you listen
00:42:18.720 to the
00:42:19.120 change with
00:42:19.640 new information,
00:42:20.500 which is good.
00:42:22.880 All right.
00:42:26.100 Sam Harris
00:42:26.940 about the
00:42:27.320 Hunter laptop
00:42:28.080 and yeah,
00:42:28.840 Sam Harris
00:42:29.300 gets 48 hours
00:42:30.300 to clarify.
00:42:31.320 Everybody
00:42:31.600 gets 48 hours.
00:42:39.400 Oh, you said
00:42:46.400 Kamala was
00:42:47.300 one of the
00:42:47.620 most effective
00:42:48.380 public speakers.
00:42:49.820 Yeah, I was
00:42:50.420 definitely wrong
00:42:51.040 about Kamala
00:42:51.760 Harris being
00:42:52.720 capable.
00:42:54.040 I still don't
00:42:54.880 know what went
00:42:55.500 wrong.
00:42:57.160 Can anybody
00:42:58.020 explain why
00:42:58.980 she seemed
00:42:59.600 capable in
00:43:00.860 Senate hearings
00:43:01.720 before she ran
00:43:02.560 for office,
00:43:03.080 but clearly
00:43:04.220 is not capable?
00:43:06.320 How was it
00:43:07.040 she, how did
00:43:08.280 she win so
00:43:09.880 many elections
00:43:10.480 that she
00:43:10.920 became senator
00:43:11.720 when we
00:43:15.920 observed that
00:43:16.740 she doesn't
00:43:17.080 have any
00:43:17.420 qualities that
00:43:18.240 would suggest
00:43:18.700 she could have
00:43:19.420 made it that
00:43:19.880 far?
00:43:20.980 I know what
00:43:21.480 you're going
00:43:21.680 to say,
00:43:22.020 she slept
00:43:22.600 with people,
00:43:23.260 blah, blah,
00:43:23.600 blah, but I
00:43:24.680 don't think it's
00:43:25.100 that.
00:43:25.780 I mean, she
00:43:26.160 won the
00:43:26.560 elections.
00:43:33.320 Yeah.
00:43:33.760 So the
00:43:37.440 weird thing
00:43:37.940 about my
00:43:38.400 Kamala Harris
00:43:39.240 prediction is
00:43:40.900 it was the
00:43:41.700 most accurate
00:43:42.680 prediction that
00:43:43.820 was totally
00:43:44.300 wrong.
00:43:45.420 It was totally
00:43:45.960 wrong, so she
00:43:47.000 did not become
00:43:47.600 the presidential
00:43:48.180 candidate, but
00:43:49.640 she did become
00:43:50.300 president for
00:43:51.140 two hours.
00:43:52.720 It's the
00:43:53.180 weirdest wrong
00:43:53.980 prediction I
00:43:54.580 ever made.
00:43:55.560 I've never
00:43:55.960 been more
00:43:56.460 right on a
00:43:57.620 prediction that
00:43:58.120 was completely
00:43:58.640 wrong.
00:43:59.020 Yeah.
00:43:59.200 Yeah.
00:43:59.220 Yeah.
00:43:59.300 Yeah.
00:43:59.320 Yeah.
00:43:59.380 Yeah.
00:43:59.780 Yeah.
00:43:59.800 Yeah.
00:43:59.820 Yeah.
00:43:59.840 Yeah.
00:43:59.860 Yeah.
00:43:59.900 Yeah.
00:43:59.980 Yeah.
00:44:04.500 She won in
00:44:05.360 California, but
00:44:06.080 still, even in
00:44:07.840 California, she
00:44:08.540 had to run
00:44:09.000 against people
00:44:10.300 who could
00:44:10.700 talk.
00:44:12.000 I just don't
00:44:12.840 understand.
00:44:13.600 Maybe something
00:44:14.240 happened to
00:44:14.820 her.
00:44:15.920 You know, maybe
00:44:16.640 did she hit
00:44:18.240 her head?
00:44:20.300 Oh, you know
00:44:21.040 what?
00:44:21.220 That would be an
00:44:21.680 interesting
00:44:21.980 question.
00:44:24.680 Has Kamala
00:44:25.520 Harris ever
00:44:26.040 had an
00:44:27.160 accident where
00:44:27.820 she banged
00:44:28.620 her head, like
00:44:29.780 in the last
00:44:30.200 several years?
00:44:32.400 That's a
00:44:33.020 serious question
00:44:33.640 by the way.
00:44:34.220 Because what
00:44:34.780 we observe
00:44:35.300 doesn't look
00:44:35.940 like she
00:44:37.120 could have
00:44:37.580 always been
00:44:38.140 this way.
00:44:40.720 Somebody says
00:44:41.460 it's the
00:44:41.800 vaccination.
00:44:47.240 Let's tie it
00:44:48.060 all together.
00:44:49.880 You know, I
00:44:50.620 think she
00:44:50.940 doesn't have
00:44:51.320 enough
00:44:51.500 vitamin D.
00:44:54.620 I think
00:44:55.260 the kraken
00:44:55.780 got her.
00:44:56.980 I think
00:44:57.320 the kraken
00:44:57.920 hurt her
00:44:59.380 brain.
00:45:00.280 But quite
00:45:01.020 seriously, she
00:45:01.760 doesn't look
00:45:02.160 like the
00:45:02.460 same person.
00:45:04.140 So it
00:45:05.260 looks like
00:45:05.600 something
00:45:05.860 happened.
00:45:07.220 And if I
00:45:07.840 found out
00:45:08.260 she had
00:45:08.580 banged her
00:45:09.000 head,
00:45:11.980 could somebody
00:45:12.860 look that
00:45:13.320 up?
00:45:14.760 It's a
00:45:15.260 serious
00:45:15.520 question.
00:45:15.980 Did she
00:45:16.260 have any
00:45:16.680 kind of
00:45:17.100 accident
00:45:17.680 where she
00:45:19.300 had a
00:45:19.560 head injury?
00:45:20.240 Because it
00:45:20.600 looks like
00:45:21.080 it.
00:45:21.340 It really
00:45:21.700 does look
00:45:22.160 like she
00:45:22.440 had a
00:45:22.600 head
00:45:22.740 injury.
00:45:24.720 Headboard.
00:45:25.200 All right.
00:45:30.260 That is the
00:45:31.180 inappropriate
00:45:31.720 joke of
00:45:32.460 the day.
00:45:33.520 The
00:45:33.860 inappropriate
00:45:34.540 joke of
00:45:35.020 the day
00:45:35.260 is that
00:45:36.040 Kamala
00:45:36.680 Harris's
00:45:37.140 head
00:45:37.340 injury
00:45:37.640 came from
00:45:38.120 the
00:45:38.280 head
00:45:39.140 board
00:45:39.360 of the
00:45:39.560 bed.
00:45:42.140 I do
00:45:42.800 not approve
00:45:43.360 of such
00:45:43.800 jokes.
00:45:44.760 They are
00:45:45.140 sexist,
00:45:46.220 probably
00:45:46.820 racist.
00:45:48.820 So you
00:45:49.460 should be
00:45:49.720 ashamed of
00:45:50.100 yourself
00:45:50.420 for making
00:45:51.740 me laugh
00:45:52.200 like that.
00:45:52.640 now here's
00:45:54.540 one thing
00:45:54.900 I'm never
00:45:55.280 going to
00:45:55.860 apologize
00:45:57.380 for.
00:45:58.840 I'd like
00:45:59.360 to just
00:45:59.620 put it
00:45:59.860 out there.
00:46:00.500 I'm never
00:46:00.920 going to
00:46:01.280 apologize
00:46:01.680 for laughing
00:46:02.520 at an
00:46:03.060 inappropriate
00:46:03.560 joke.
00:46:05.380 Because it's
00:46:06.120 the inappropriate
00:46:06.740 part that
00:46:07.320 makes me
00:46:07.680 laugh.
00:46:09.120 If the
00:46:09.720 joke were
00:46:10.100 not
00:46:10.380 inappropriate
00:46:10.940 it wouldn't
00:46:11.600 even be
00:46:12.540 anything.
00:46:13.560 It's the
00:46:14.120 fact that
00:46:14.500 it's
00:46:14.640 completely
00:46:15.080 socially
00:46:15.660 unacceptable
00:46:16.400 that makes
00:46:17.440 it funny
00:46:17.820 in the
00:46:18.060 first place.
00:46:19.020 I'm not
00:46:19.280 going to
00:46:19.480 apologize
00:46:19.800 for laughing
00:46:20.520 at something
00:46:20.940 that's
00:46:21.200 socially
00:46:21.520 unacceptable.
00:46:23.620 That always
00:46:24.340 makes me
00:46:24.760 laugh.
00:46:25.600 Even if
00:46:26.180 it were
00:46:26.380 about me.
00:46:27.640 Like even
00:46:28.200 if I'm
00:46:28.580 the target
00:46:29.020 of the
00:46:29.340 joke.
00:46:30.260 Funny is
00:46:30.720 funny.
00:46:31.600 If it's
00:46:31.960 inappropriate
00:46:32.400 it's
00:46:32.680 inappropriate.
00:46:33.460 It makes
00:46:33.720 me laugh.
00:46:37.500 So I'm
00:46:38.140 going to
00:46:38.340 laugh at
00:46:38.760 anything I
00:46:39.200 think is
00:46:39.500 funny and
00:46:40.020 I'm going
00:46:40.260 to associate
00:46:41.180 in any
00:46:41.900 way with
00:46:42.420 anybody I
00:46:43.040 want.
00:46:43.800 And none
00:46:44.240 of those
00:46:44.580 are your
00:46:44.900 business.
00:46:46.500 I like
00:46:47.040 to just
00:46:47.500 re-emphasize
00:46:48.180 that as
00:46:48.860 often as
00:46:49.240 possible.
00:46:52.640 what's
00:46:58.700 on the
00:46:59.000 bottom
00:46:59.300 shelf
00:46:59.740 behind
00:47:00.160 me?
00:47:02.380 Headphones
00:47:02.940 that I'm
00:47:04.620 not using.
00:47:12.680 Kamala can
00:47:13.420 dish out
00:47:13.840 the
00:47:14.000 criticism
00:47:14.460 but can
00:47:15.400 she take
00:47:15.800 it?
00:47:16.100 Sure.
00:47:16.300 Heinlein
00:47:20.460 says all
00:47:21.120 humor is
00:47:21.660 meant to
00:47:21.980 hurt
00:47:22.140 someone.
00:47:23.460 Is that
00:47:23.880 true?
00:47:24.560 That all
00:47:25.020 humor is
00:47:25.700 meant to
00:47:26.160 hurt
00:47:26.400 someone?
00:47:29.500 It's
00:47:30.020 pretty close
00:47:30.500 to the
00:47:30.720 true.
00:47:41.260 She came
00:47:42.060 back looking
00:47:42.620 different.
00:47:43.720 Yeah she
00:47:44.020 did.
00:47:44.340 I assume
00:47:44.660 that was
00:47:45.020 just some
00:47:45.480 cosmetic
00:47:46.120 work.
00:47:53.940 Not
00:47:54.380 dad jokes?
00:47:55.420 Yeah dad
00:47:55.920 jokes don't
00:47:56.380 have any
00:47:56.720 target that's
00:47:57.300 true.
00:48:00.700 Guy walks
00:48:01.520 into a
00:48:01.880 bar and
00:48:02.300 says ouch.
00:48:03.440 Okay.
00:48:07.600 Alright well
00:48:08.280 I don't have
00:48:08.660 anything else
00:48:09.120 to say so
00:48:09.560 I won't
00:48:09.840 keep you.
00:48:11.420 August is
00:48:12.400 a slow
00:48:13.120 news month
00:48:13.820 for all
00:48:14.960 the obvious
00:48:15.500 reasons.
00:48:16.360 As soon
00:48:16.760 as we
00:48:16.960 get out
00:48:17.240 of the
00:48:17.480 August
00:48:17.920 doldrums
00:48:18.920 well then
00:48:20.600 we'll have
00:48:20.960 some fun
00:48:21.440 because the
00:48:23.160 election is
00:48:23.620 going to
00:48:23.800 really heat
00:48:24.220 up September
00:48:25.320 going forward.
00:48:30.080 Alright
00:48:30.640 and that's
00:48:32.840 all for now.
00:48:33.860 I'll talk to
00:48:34.540 you tomorrow.
00:48:35.660 Jeffrey
00:48:41.120 come on.
00:48:41.820 Bye.
00:48:44.160 Bye.
00:48:45.120 Bye.
00:48:45.700 Bye.
00:48:46.100 Bye.
00:48:46.720 Bye.
00:48:51.000 Bye.
00:48:53.120 Bye.
00:48:56.500 Bye.