Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1842 Scott Adams： Republicans Might Have Trouble In The Midterms, The Big Bang Might Be Fake

00:00:00.160 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of civilization.

00:00:05.660 It's the greatest thing since the Big Bang.

00:00:09.000 Oops.

00:00:10.560 We're going to talk about that.

00:00:12.640 But before we do that, would you like to take it up a level?

00:00:17.620 Would you like to take your energy up to places that nobody's ever been before?

00:00:23.280 Yeah, you do.

00:00:24.200 And all you need is a cupper mug or a glass of tank or chalice or stein,

00:00:27.440 a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:31.200 And if you're new to the locals' platform, be sure you don't over-sip, no overdosing.

00:00:37.540 But for the rest of you, please join me in the unparalleled pleasure,

00:00:43.600 the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better.

00:00:47.300 It's called the simultaneous sip.

00:00:50.040 And it happens now.

00:00:51.880 Go.

00:00:52.200 Go.

00:00:52.260 Oh, yeah.

00:00:58.820 Yeah, that's the stuff.

00:01:00.840 That is the stuff.

00:01:03.380 All my systems are coming online.

00:01:07.640 Does it feel as good to you as it does to me?

00:01:10.500 Do you feel a tingle yet?

00:01:12.360 Oh, you will.

00:01:13.740 Because the show is just getting started.

00:01:16.360 That tingle will hit you any minute now.

00:01:18.680 So, it turns out the Big Bang has been debunked.

00:01:24.660 I talked about this in my live stream last night from my man cave,

00:01:29.100 which only the locals' people watched.

00:01:32.260 But it turns out that the Hubble telescope can look so far into the universe,

00:01:37.860 we can find out that everything we know is wrong.

00:01:41.960 Everything we know is wrong.

00:01:43.340 Oh, it's the Webb, not the Hubble, it's the Webb.

00:01:47.800 Sorry.

00:01:49.040 Wrong telescope.

00:01:51.060 James Webb, okay.

00:01:52.340 Okay, James Webb.

00:01:54.080 We're now corrected.

00:01:57.380 But it turns out everything we thought we knew about the universe was wrong.

00:02:02.400 And here's the dumb guy's explanation of the smart people's realization.

00:02:08.840 If you look to the farthest parts of the galaxy,

00:02:12.560 the one thing you should definitely expect to see

00:02:14.760 is that they look younger,

00:02:17.800 that the furthest galaxies would look the youngest

00:02:21.100 because they were the original ones that have been expanding the furthest.

00:02:26.280 But they're not younger.

00:02:28.640 Or they're not as young as they need to be.

00:02:31.260 In other words, when you look at the universe,

00:02:34.140 the Big Bang theory just collapses.

00:02:37.100 It collapses.

00:02:38.160 It collapses.

00:02:39.920 So whatever is true about the universe,

00:02:43.860 the Big Bang probably isn't true.

00:02:46.700 And all the people who have been working in that field forever

00:02:49.320 are being kind of quiet about it.

00:02:52.800 But apparently, according to at least one report in hot air,

00:02:57.900 but reportedly they're all pretty nervous about the fact

00:03:01.080 that the most basic thing that we thought we knew about reality,

00:03:04.900 that's not true.

00:03:05.560 Not even true.

00:03:08.620 So, what would be a way to explain how everything got here

00:03:12.900 without the Big Bang?

00:03:16.340 Huh.

00:03:18.020 Well, looks like we're back to intelligent design, maybe.

00:03:23.060 Maybe a little God hypothesis back in the mix.

00:03:26.560 Maybe.

00:03:28.240 Maybe.

00:03:28.880 But whether it's God or some species that created another simulation

00:03:38.280 and it's us, we don't know.

00:03:40.720 Or it could be just that there's another scientific explanation

00:03:43.640 that we just don't know yet.

00:03:45.780 But if you had guessed that both evolution and the Big Bang

00:03:50.400 would be debunked in your lifetime,

00:03:53.180 well, you would have been right, I think.

00:03:58.700 All right.

00:04:00.020 And I say both of those are debunked

00:04:02.680 because the simulation theory

00:04:05.180 is far more likely an explanation

00:04:07.920 of how we're here.

00:04:09.420 And it doesn't require either evolution,

00:04:13.880 neither evolution nor the Big Bang

00:04:15.500 are not required if we're a simulation.

00:04:17.960 Because software can just make things any way it wants.

00:04:20.860 So the big news is that the daughter

00:04:25.280 of one of Putin's closer allies

00:04:29.320 just got murdered in a car bomb in Russia.

00:04:33.520 Now, reportedly, and this is not reliable yet,

00:04:37.340 reportedly the father was supposed to be in the car also,

00:04:40.440 but at the last minute they may have taken different cars.

00:04:43.300 But the car that was supposed to have

00:04:44.960 Putin's close advisor in it blew up.

00:04:49.080 But the close advisor's daughter was in it.

00:04:53.640 Yeah, so Alexander Dugin was his name.

00:04:57.560 Now, there's some disagreement about how close he was

00:05:00.000 or how influential he was to Putin,

00:05:03.620 but it feels to me like maybe Ukraine just sent him a message.

00:05:08.160 What do you think?

00:05:09.600 Did Ukraine just send a message?

00:05:12.700 If you were Ukraine, 0.76

00:05:14.160 wouldn't you try to take out the leadership

00:05:15.680 in Moscow, if you could?

00:05:20.160 Because Russia tried to decapitation strike on Ukraine.

00:05:25.360 If you're trying to take out the leader of one country,

00:05:28.440 doesn't that country have the right

00:05:29.760 to try to take out your leader?

00:05:32.340 I mean, forget about whether it's a right, 0.98

00:05:35.100 because war is not about what's right.

00:05:36.900 Certainly, it's a free punch.

00:05:41.460 It's a free punch.

00:05:43.380 Now, of course, you're all going to say

00:05:47.380 it's some kind of weird false flag,

00:05:49.100 and China or the United States or Great Britain did it.

00:05:52.980 There's no evidence of any of that.

00:05:55.640 There's one candidate who looks really likely.

00:06:00.440 I don't think it's the CIA.

00:06:01.740 I mean, I suppose if the CIA killed a top Russian

00:06:07.220 and then got caught,

00:06:10.340 that could never be worth the risk.

00:06:12.920 There's no way the CIA would think it's worth the risk

00:06:16.160 to take out a civilian who's just an advisor.

00:06:21.720 Let me say that that sounds personal.

00:06:25.780 It sounds personal.

00:06:27.280 Because apparently this guy was also a super pro-nationalist.

00:06:33.700 So that's exactly who the Ukrainians would want to take. 1.00

00:06:37.060 Everything about this feels personal.

00:06:39.040 It doesn't feel...

00:06:40.600 If the CIA did it, it would be professional.

00:06:43.860 And it would have, like, a clear strategic benefit.

00:06:48.040 This doesn't look exactly like it has a strategic benefit.

00:06:51.500 It looks personal.

00:06:53.520 I think they're just going to kill as many people

00:06:55.660 close to Putin as they can.

00:06:58.280 I would.

00:07:00.100 You know, if I were Zelensky,

00:07:02.180 I would try to...

00:07:03.360 And I knew that Putin was trying to kill me

00:07:05.380 and people I loved.

00:07:06.800 I would kill as many people around him as I could get to.

00:07:10.520 So I assume it's him.

00:07:12.340 But you've got to be careful about your assumptions.

00:07:16.260 Speaking of assumptions,

00:07:18.580 Mitch McConnell warns us,

00:07:20.920 and I think he's right about this,

00:07:22.660 that don't get too cocky

00:07:24.740 about some big red wave coming for the midterms.

00:07:28.760 The House might, in fact, turn Republican.

00:07:33.520 But you should be warned

00:07:36.000 that Senate races are different.

00:07:38.680 And even if one party is more popular than the other,

00:07:42.020 Senate races tend to turn on the quality of the candidate.

00:07:45.800 So the Senate is way more about

00:07:48.800 the individual differences between the candidates.

00:07:52.100 The House races are a little bit more

00:07:53.780 do you like to be a Republican

00:07:54.940 or do you like to be a Democrat today?

00:07:58.420 So don't get comfortable

00:08:01.200 that there's going to be a red wave

00:08:03.320 that takes both houses.

00:08:05.260 The Senate is probably a toss-up.

00:08:08.320 The Senate is probably a toss-up.

00:08:10.580 Now, of course, Mitch would want to say that,

00:08:12.880 Mitch McConnell,

00:08:14.240 to make sure that Republicans go and vote.

00:08:17.660 So this is the phase

00:08:19.440 where both sides are going to tell you,

00:08:20.980 well, it's really close.

00:08:22.680 You better vote.

00:08:24.560 We don't know which way it goes.

00:08:26.160 If you stay home, it could be up to you.

00:08:28.760 So there's a little of that going on, too.

00:08:31.740 But I do buy that theory 0.75

00:08:33.280 that the Senate is more about

00:08:34.560 the candidate than the House is.

00:08:37.500 Does that sound right to you?

00:08:41.440 Sounds right to me.

00:08:42.880 All right.

00:08:45.020 There's a new thing happening

00:08:46.960 that I'm seeing so much

00:08:48.260 and I absolutely hate it.

00:08:50.460 And I call it the cringe victory lap.

00:08:54.060 The cringe victory lap.

00:08:56.580 It's people who had a position

00:08:58.480 during the pandemic

00:08:59.520 who believed that the science

00:09:01.680 has now proven that they were right,

00:09:04.080 but it didn't.

00:09:06.180 And so people are doing victory laps

00:09:08.220 on stuff that really isn't proven.

00:09:10.820 It might be a little evidence,

00:09:13.480 you know, that looks like

00:09:14.500 it's in your favor,

00:09:15.380 but a lot of stuff isn't proven.

00:09:18.440 And one of those things

00:09:19.400 that's happening is,

00:09:20.840 you know, I talked about

00:09:21.540 the vitamin D study

00:09:22.640 that's highly correlated

00:09:24.380 with COVID outcomes.

00:09:26.160 Highly, highly correlated.

00:09:27.800 Study after study.

00:09:29.780 And therefore,

00:09:30.540 you should have taken vitamin D

00:09:32.360 and you didn't need

00:09:34.360 those vaccinations,

00:09:35.900 say a number of people

00:09:36.900 on social media.

00:09:39.680 But this study doesn't say

00:09:41.660 anything like that.

00:09:43.220 Not even close.

00:09:44.960 The study says

00:09:45.780 there's a correlation.

00:09:48.000 That's it.

00:09:48.560 Somebody told me

00:09:51.500 just before I got on here,

00:09:52.920 and so it's just something

00:09:53.780 I saw on Twitter,

00:09:55.660 maybe if there's a doctor here

00:09:57.100 you can confirm

00:09:58.040 or debunk this.

00:10:00.160 I think there are enough

00:10:01.060 doctors watching this

00:10:02.060 that we can get an answer

00:10:03.000 pretty soon.

00:10:04.080 Somebody said that vitamin D,

00:10:05.640 low vitamin D levels,

00:10:06.760 are highly correlated

00:10:08.120 with heart disease.

00:10:10.880 True or false?

00:10:12.380 Low vitamin D,

00:10:13.580 highly correlated

00:10:14.400 with heart disease.

00:10:16.740 True?

00:10:16.960 True or false?

00:10:21.680 Let's see.

00:10:22.960 If you're a doctor,

00:10:24.240 say you're a doctor

00:10:24.940 before you give me the answer.

00:10:28.600 I think the answer is yes.

00:10:30.920 But if you see something

00:10:31.960 different there,

00:10:33.200 tell me.

00:10:34.040 So, low vitamin D,

00:10:36.660 highly correlated

00:10:37.620 with heart problems.

00:10:40.860 So therefore,

00:10:42.060 you should give everybody

00:10:42.980 who has heart problems

00:10:43.940 vitamin D supplements, right?

00:10:45.380 Doesn't that make sense?

00:10:47.880 Highly, highly correlated.

00:10:50.240 But they don't do that.

00:10:53.620 They don't do that.

00:10:55.260 Do you know why?

00:10:56.160 Because they have not proven

00:10:57.480 that vitamin D supplements

00:10:58.840 help your heart disease.

00:11:01.320 They just know it's correlated.

00:11:03.820 So, be careful.

00:11:05.240 The COVID thing could be that.

00:11:06.780 Now, every time you find,

00:11:09.280 you know,

00:11:09.540 another study

00:11:10.220 that's in the same direction,

00:11:11.780 well, maybe it's telling you more.

00:11:14.040 But it seems to me

00:11:15.180 that if you did

00:11:15.780 a hundred

00:11:16.260 randomized controlled trials

00:11:18.660 and every one of them

00:11:20.380 confirmed that vitamin D

00:11:21.600 is highly correlated

00:11:22.760 with good outcomes,

00:11:25.100 it still,

00:11:26.000 still would tell you nothing

00:11:27.720 about whether you should

00:11:29.460 take more vitamin D.

00:11:32.440 It feels like it does,

00:11:34.140 but it doesn't matter

00:11:35.120 how many of those tests you do.

00:11:36.620 It's just telling you

00:11:37.520 the correlation exists.

00:11:39.200 But the correlation

00:11:40.260 should exist.

00:11:42.120 Somebody said to me,

00:11:43.180 but Scott, Scott, Scott,

00:11:44.400 if you have a hypothesis,

00:11:46.500 that's how you know

00:11:48.660 that the study is valid.

00:11:50.040 Because the hypothesis is

00:11:51.380 better vitamin D

00:11:53.180 gives better outcomes.

00:11:54.600 But there are two hypotheses.

00:11:56.860 One hypothesis is that

00:11:58.320 people in poor health

00:11:59.760 have bad outcomes

00:12:00.580 and people in bad health

00:12:01.780 have low vitamin D.

00:12:02.920 So I don't want

00:12:04.320 to beat this to death,

00:12:05.320 but if you're doing

00:12:06.640 a cringe victory lap

00:12:08.260 based on some science

00:12:09.500 that does not support

00:12:10.540 your point of view,

00:12:11.640 it doesn't conflict with it,

00:12:13.560 it just doesn't support it.

00:12:17.200 Now,

00:12:18.400 somebody pointed out

00:12:20.100 that I'm a hypocrite

00:12:21.280 because I have a tweet

00:12:23.120 from long ago

00:12:24.160 saying that vitamin D tests

00:12:26.260 could be used

00:12:27.140 to end the pandemic.

00:12:29.340 And somebody said,

00:12:32.360 Scott,

00:12:33.560 why do you say

00:12:34.500 vitamin D is

00:12:35.720 only correlated

00:12:37.560 and yet at the same time

00:12:39.220 you're saying

00:12:39.620 a vitamin D test

00:12:40.540 would be useful

00:12:41.160 to end the pandemic?

00:12:42.120 How do you explain

00:12:43.000 that total inconsistency,

00:12:44.800 Scott?

00:12:46.560 Does anybody know

00:12:47.500 how I explain that?

00:12:49.380 How do I explain

00:12:50.300 the total inconsistency

00:12:51.860 that I believe

00:12:53.080 a vitamin D test

00:12:54.220 would be very useful

00:12:55.220 to have ended

00:12:56.200 the pandemic sooner?

00:12:57.440 but I also don't think

00:12:59.600 that the causation

00:13:00.640 is demonstrated.

00:13:02.920 It's not inconsistent

00:13:04.220 at all.

00:13:06.220 I'm saying that

00:13:07.220 correlation is demonstrated

00:13:08.640 and causation

00:13:09.640 might be true

00:13:10.540 but it hasn't been demonstrated.

00:13:12.680 Correlation is all

00:13:13.520 you need for the test.

00:13:15.260 You don't need

00:13:16.020 causation

00:13:17.040 to test

00:13:18.620 to see if somebody

00:13:19.400 is vulnerable.

00:13:20.500 If there's a correlation

00:13:21.800 that's all you need.

00:13:23.080 Oh, these people

00:13:23.720 are vulnerable.

00:13:24.760 There's no inconsistency

00:13:26.580 between those opinions.

00:13:29.260 All right.

00:13:29.980 Now just to make

00:13:30.780 everything complicated.

00:13:33.220 So now I've done

00:13:34.100 my impassioned,

00:13:37.120 overly repeated statement

00:13:39.180 that correlation

00:13:40.080 is not causation

00:13:41.060 and then CNN

00:13:42.340 has a report

00:13:43.180 that says obesity

00:13:44.360 might not make you unhealthy.

00:13:47.860 Do you know

00:13:48.480 what their argument is?

00:13:49.960 That obesity

00:13:51.000 might not be

00:13:52.780 an indicator

00:13:53.460 of bad health.

00:13:55.120 Do you know why?

00:13:55.720 Because it's a correlation

00:13:58.220 and the causation

00:14:01.220 has not been proven.

00:14:03.220 Does that sound

00:14:04.120 right to you?

00:14:05.420 Do you think

00:14:06.440 that obesity

00:14:06.960 is just a correlation?

00:14:09.680 It's not a causation?

00:14:12.460 Are we really

00:14:13.460 at a point

00:14:13.840 where that has not

00:14:14.600 been demonstrated?

00:14:17.260 Well, let's switch

00:14:18.100 over to Fox News.

00:14:20.080 Let's see

00:14:20.600 what Fox News says.

00:14:23.260 Let's see.

00:14:23.840 Fox News

00:14:24.320 has a story about

00:14:25.220 a sports

00:14:28.820 illustrated swimsuit

00:14:30.120 model

00:14:30.400 who's a plus-sized 0.83

00:14:31.820 woman 0.99

00:14:33.820 and she wants 0.90

00:14:36.000 you to know

00:14:36.440 that she can be

00:14:37.260 healthy too.

00:14:39.480 So both

00:14:40.340 the left

00:14:41.560 and the right

00:14:42.080 media

00:14:42.500 are telling

00:14:43.240 stories

00:14:43.840 that are

00:14:45.240 telling us

00:14:46.220 not to be

00:14:46.820 so harsh

00:14:47.580 with those

00:14:48.780 who have

00:14:49.140 extra weight

00:14:49.900 because

00:14:51.460 you're just

00:14:52.480 assuming

00:14:52.840 that they're

00:14:53.240 unhealthy

00:14:53.600 and that's

00:14:54.080 unfair.

00:14:59.700 Now,

00:15:00.400 it's really

00:15:00.880 tough for me

00:15:01.520 to go

00:15:01.940 from my

00:15:03.060 impassioned

00:15:03.640 argument

00:15:04.000 that correlation

00:15:05.520 does not

00:15:06.120 equal causation

00:15:07.100 and then

00:15:08.100 have this story

00:15:08.860 slap me in the face 0.98

00:15:09.860 because even

00:15:11.300 I think

00:15:12.000 correlation

00:15:12.560 equals causation

00:15:13.680 when it comes

00:15:14.180 to weight.

00:15:14.820 Do we really

00:15:17.720 not know that?

00:15:19.840 Now,

00:15:20.360 let me accept

00:15:21.580 I do accept

00:15:23.500 the notion

00:15:24.340 that there are

00:15:25.420 people carrying

00:15:26.060 extra weight

00:15:26.920 who are not

00:15:27.980 especially unhealthy.

00:15:30.220 We all agree

00:15:31.200 on that, right?

00:15:31.840 There are people

00:15:32.340 who have some

00:15:33.180 extra pounds

00:15:33.880 who are probably

00:15:35.240 healthier than

00:15:36.020 the average person.

00:15:37.440 That's got to be

00:15:38.240 true because there

00:15:39.200 are so many people

00:15:39.880 in the world.

00:15:40.720 We have all types.

00:15:41.480 So, you know,

00:15:43.340 any kind of person

00:15:44.200 you hypothesize

00:15:45.960 exists,

00:15:46.900 it probably does.

00:15:48.080 It probably exists.

00:15:50.280 But I'm pretty sure

00:15:51.700 that extra weight

00:15:52.620 is not doing you

00:15:53.500 any favors.

00:15:54.940 I mean, I can't

00:15:55.600 believe that it's

00:15:56.180 good for you

00:15:56.920 or that it's

00:15:58.020 even neutral.

00:15:59.560 But, okay.

00:16:05.780 Yeah.

00:16:07.640 So, I asked

00:16:09.200 this question

00:16:09.820 and got shot

00:16:10.740 down today.

00:16:11.480 because I was

00:16:13.860 watching the news,

00:16:15.320 let's say the

00:16:15.920 social media news,

00:16:16.960 what is trending?

00:16:18.840 And it seemed

00:16:19.880 to me that

00:16:20.320 everything trending

00:16:21.120 lately is about

00:16:22.960 a man behaving

00:16:24.220 badly.

00:16:25.620 A man behaving 0.80

00:16:26.580 badly.

00:16:27.420 And I asked

00:16:28.020 the question,

00:16:28.820 are there any

00:16:30.260 women being

00:16:31.080 canceled or

00:16:32.460 is it all men?

00:16:34.120 And then, of course,

00:16:35.240 I immediately

00:16:35.940 learned that, yes,

00:16:36.940 there were many

00:16:37.380 women who got 0.67

00:16:37.980 canceled.

00:16:38.860 So, there was

00:16:39.340 Roseanne,

00:16:40.720 Gina Carano,

00:16:41.460 Laura Loomer,

00:16:42.780 J.K. Rowling,

00:16:44.100 Naomi Wolf,

00:16:45.020 list goes on.

00:16:46.760 But at the

00:16:47.140 moment, yeah,

00:16:48.780 Amber Heard,

00:16:49.600 somebody says,

00:16:50.400 I guess she got

00:16:51.080 canceled.

00:16:52.680 Liz Cheney,

00:16:53.700 maybe she got 0.57

00:16:54.260 canceled.

00:16:55.840 She-Hulk got 0.92

00:16:56.840 canceled.

00:17:00.780 Paula Deen,

00:17:02.000 yeah, okay.

00:17:02.440 However, at the

00:17:05.300 moment, there's

00:17:06.080 something else

00:17:06.580 going on.

00:17:08.120 So, at the

00:17:08.580 moment, these are

00:17:09.440 the names that

00:17:10.240 keep showing up

00:17:11.520 in trending

00:17:12.120 Twitter.

00:17:13.260 And they're

00:17:14.000 showing up in

00:17:15.040 terms of being

00:17:15.580 criticized.

00:17:17.760 So, you've got

00:17:19.040 your Jordan

00:17:19.540 Peterson, your

00:17:20.840 Joe Rogan, Alex

00:17:21.840 Jones, Elon Musk,

00:17:23.480 Andrew Taint,

00:17:25.060 Sam Harris,

00:17:26.940 Brett Weinstein,

00:17:27.700 and, you

00:17:31.020 know, at

00:17:31.360 various times.

00:17:32.140 You know, Brett

00:17:32.560 is not in the

00:17:33.380 news at the

00:17:33.980 moment.

00:17:34.740 But at various

00:17:35.380 times, they've

00:17:36.120 all been taken

00:17:36.620 on.

00:17:37.320 And here's the

00:17:38.000 one I'm

00:17:38.680 wondering about.

00:17:39.360 Does it feel

00:17:43.160 like they're

00:17:44.580 going after the

00:17:45.320 internet dads?

00:17:48.220 It's not, it's

00:17:49.080 not, it's not,

00:17:50.040 not T-A-I-N-T.

00:17:54.820 It's, it's

00:17:55.320 Andrew Taint, T-A-T-T-A-N-T.

00:18:00.580 If you're hearing

00:18:01.460 a difference, that's

00:18:02.240 one of those, that's

00:18:05.240 one of those Laurel

00:18:06.800 Yanni things.

00:18:08.200 You hear what you

00:18:08.820 want to say?

00:18:09.800 Because what I'm

00:18:10.360 saying is T-A-T-E.

00:18:13.960 Taint.

00:18:14.980 How does it

00:18:15.680 sound to you?

00:18:17.200 See, if you, if

00:18:17.980 you think it's the

00:18:18.680 other one, you hear

00:18:19.220 it that way.

00:18:20.500 Taint.

00:18:25.360 So here's my

00:18:26.220 question.

00:18:26.800 Do you think

00:18:27.300 there's something

00:18:29.100 about masculinity

00:18:31.220 that's maybe people

00:18:33.760 are afraid of?

00:18:34.520 Oh, my God, a lot of

00:18:41.900 you hear it as with

00:18:43.000 an N. 0.66

00:18:44.500 You're hearing it

00:18:45.280 that way?

00:18:45.640 That's funny.

00:18:46.760 Interesting.

00:18:51.840 All right.

00:18:53.980 I guess that, I

00:18:56.440 guess that wasn't

00:18:57.120 interesting.

00:18:57.520 is anything else

00:19:01.560 happening?

00:19:02.120 You know, August is

00:19:02.960 such a slow month.

00:19:03.880 So, Jordan Peterson is

00:19:13.340 getting a lot of heat

00:19:14.460 lately.

00:19:15.660 What do you think

00:19:16.300 about that?

00:19:16.820 Has Jordan Peterson

00:19:19.920 said anything that

00:19:20.840 hurts anybody?

00:19:22.440 Because he's getting

00:19:23.240 so much heat.

00:19:24.400 Now, a lot of it is

00:19:25.140 because he's, you

00:19:26.080 know, he's, he's

00:19:28.480 gotten emotional

00:19:29.280 during interviews.

00:19:32.100 And I do wonder

00:19:33.440 what's up with that.

00:19:34.360 To me, that looks

00:19:35.140 like health-related.

00:19:39.040 Possibly some meds

00:19:40.260 or something's going

00:19:41.540 on.

00:19:41.880 Makes him a little

00:19:42.380 more emotional.

00:19:43.000 But I hate judging

00:19:45.280 him for that.

00:19:47.560 Are we going to,

00:19:48.100 are we going to

00:19:48.600 judge Jordan Peterson

00:19:50.260 for being emotional?

00:19:52.680 Is that, does that

00:19:53.960 feel fair?

00:19:56.060 Like, who else are

00:19:57.220 you going to judge

00:19:57.760 for being emotional?

00:20:00.120 What about me?

00:20:02.220 You know, I, I've

00:20:03.440 shown you some

00:20:04.120 different looks here

00:20:05.920 because, you know,

00:20:06.980 this is live, so you

00:20:08.220 get what, you get

00:20:08.940 whatever you get.

00:20:10.700 I don't know.

00:20:11.780 It feels like a

00:20:12.440 little bit unfair,

00:20:13.280 doesn't it, to, to

00:20:16.400 accuse him of being

00:20:17.460 emotional when, in

00:20:19.060 fact, everything he

00:20:20.180 does is based on

00:20:21.020 emotion.

00:20:22.280 Now, when I say

00:20:23.080 everything he does is

00:20:23.920 based on emotion, I

00:20:24.880 don't mean that he's

00:20:25.680 irrational.

00:20:26.400 He's very rational.

00:20:27.920 He's highly pragmatic

00:20:29.220 and rational.

00:20:30.520 But, you can see that

00:20:32.040 he's driven by some

00:20:34.340 kind of emotional

00:20:35.260 impulses just like

00:20:38.140 everybody else.

00:20:39.580 Just like everybody

00:20:40.500 else.

00:20:40.860 So, here's what it

00:20:48.740 feels like.

00:20:49.320 Here's what it feels

00:20:50.080 like to me.

00:20:51.140 It feels like the

00:20:53.080 people on the left

00:20:54.660 or the people who,

00:20:56.700 maybe the, the

00:20:57.460 grand manipulators,

00:20:58.760 whoever they are,

00:20:59.800 have decided that

00:21:00.840 there are certain

00:21:01.640 internet personalities

00:21:03.200 who have too much

00:21:04.260 influence.

00:21:05.340 influence.

00:21:06.560 So, what it looks

00:21:07.700 to me is that the,

00:21:09.100 the people coming

00:21:11.560 after everybody from

00:21:12.880 Joe Rogan to

00:21:15.720 Andrew Taint,

00:21:17.620 T-A-T, 1.00

00:21:19.060 Taint,

00:21:20.040 they're all trying to

00:21:21.820 reduce their influence.

00:21:23.500 You know, there are

00:21:23.960 plenty of legitimate

00:21:25.040 reasons to go after

00:21:27.260 Alex Jones.

00:21:28.160 He gives you

00:21:30.040 legitimate reasons,

00:21:31.240 but I don't think

00:21:31.820 that's the reason.

00:21:33.640 You know, obviously

00:21:34.180 the Sandy Hook

00:21:34.880 people have a good

00:21:35.640 reason.

00:21:36.440 But, for the, the

00:21:37.760 people who are

00:21:38.220 piling on, I don't

00:21:39.240 think it's so much

00:21:39.980 about Sandy Hook.

00:21:41.400 You know, obviously

00:21:42.020 some of it is.

00:21:43.180 But, I feel like

00:21:43.880 it's reducing

00:21:44.820 influence.

00:21:46.480 Because, if you're

00:21:47.360 a Democrat, the

00:21:48.240 last thing you want

00:21:49.140 is for Joe Rogan

00:21:50.140 to have influence.

00:21:51.880 Right?

00:21:52.620 And you want to,

00:21:53.440 you want to make

00:21:54.020 sure he has less

00:21:54.780 influence before the

00:21:55.740 actual voting starts

00:21:56.860 for 2022 and 2024.

00:21:59.360 So, I feel like a

00:22:00.400 lot of this is to

00:22:01.140 take, to take

00:22:02.280 players off the

00:22:03.360 board for election

00:22:05.940 reasons going

00:22:06.860 forward.

00:22:07.520 That's what it

00:22:08.160 feels like.

00:22:08.860 It feels like players

00:22:10.020 being taken off the

00:22:11.020 board.

00:22:12.940 And, you know

00:22:15.080 they're coming from

00:22:15.780 me, right?

00:22:18.080 Are you all

00:22:19.060 waiting for that?

00:22:19.740 Because, I feel like

00:22:21.280 a number of people

00:22:22.200 have taken a run

00:22:24.000 at it, but nothing

00:22:24.880 organized or

00:22:25.960 professional yet.

00:22:27.660 So, so far it's

00:22:28.440 like individuals and

00:22:29.740 smaller publications

00:22:30.840 and stuff.

00:22:31.840 But, you won't

00:22:33.180 know that they came

00:22:33.980 after me until you

00:22:34.780 see something in the

00:22:35.820 Wall Street Journal.

00:22:38.920 Probably more likely

00:22:40.000 there than the

00:22:40.600 Washington Post.

00:22:42.100 Do you know why

00:22:42.560 the Washington Post

00:22:43.300 is less likely to

00:22:44.440 write a hit piece

00:22:45.200 on me?

00:22:46.820 Guess.

00:22:47.880 Why is the

00:22:48.420 Washington Post

00:22:49.200 the least likely

00:22:50.280 to write a hit

00:22:50.980 piece on me?

00:22:54.560 Because they run

00:22:55.360 Dilbert.

00:22:56.360 They run Dilbert.

00:22:57.920 It's one of their

00:22:58.740 biggest comics.

00:23:00.580 Now, it doesn't

00:23:01.540 stop me from

00:23:02.160 criticizing them.

00:23:03.880 And do you know

00:23:04.420 why I don't get

00:23:05.200 kicked out of the

00:23:05.840 Washington Post

00:23:06.520 even though I

00:23:07.180 criticize them?

00:23:09.280 Guess why?

00:23:10.660 Why does Dilbert

00:23:11.400 not get kicked out

00:23:12.380 of the Washington

00:23:13.060 Post even though I

00:23:14.040 viciously criticize

00:23:15.360 them?

00:23:15.720 Well, you're

00:23:18.860 going to be

00:23:19.100 surprised at my

00:23:19.840 answer.

00:23:22.140 It's because

00:23:23.000 newspaper editors

00:23:24.380 have balls.

00:23:26.020 Both the men and

00:23:26.900 the women. 0.81

00:23:27.420 We're speaking

00:23:27.800 hypothetical or

00:23:31.600 metaphorical balls

00:23:33.440 here.

00:23:33.660 Yeah.

00:23:35.000 Newspapers are the

00:23:36.780 last bastion of

00:23:38.060 free speech.

00:23:40.060 You know, even

00:23:40.860 though they have

00:23:41.300 their issues.

00:23:42.580 Newspapers will

00:23:43.360 run unpopular

00:23:44.160 stuff.

00:23:45.560 So a newspaper

00:23:46.100 will let you be

00:23:47.420 content at the

00:23:48.940 same time you

00:23:49.640 are criticizing

00:23:50.500 them.

00:23:51.160 Free speech.

00:23:52.480 Believe it or

00:23:53.280 not, it's a good

00:23:54.080 reason.

00:23:56.500 There is

00:23:57.780 something about

00:23:59.220 the newspapers

00:23:59.840 that will allow

00:24:00.720 you a little bit

00:24:01.620 more leeway.

00:24:06.860 And I appreciate

00:24:07.640 that.

00:24:08.240 I think that's

00:24:09.040 worth calling out.

00:24:09.800 But the New

00:24:11.300 York Times does

00:24:11.980 not run

00:24:12.400 Dilbert.

00:24:14.300 Bloomberg does

00:24:15.800 not run

00:24:16.260 Dilbert.

00:24:16.680 So Bloomberg

00:24:17.120 tried to take

00:24:18.280 me out during

00:24:19.280 the 2016

00:24:20.160 election run.

00:24:21.400 They did a

00:24:21.760 big hit piece

00:24:22.300 on me.

00:24:23.460 And I'm

00:24:24.700 expecting another

00:24:25.480 one because that

00:24:26.180 one's kind of

00:24:26.680 aged.

00:24:28.580 And it can't

00:24:29.560 be a small

00:24:30.120 publication because

00:24:31.100 that wouldn't

00:24:31.400 make enough

00:24:31.820 difference.

00:24:32.620 So it's got to

00:24:33.360 be something

00:24:33.900 national and

00:24:35.480 something that

00:24:36.060 Dilbert is not

00:24:37.200 a client of.

00:24:39.800 Or vice

00:24:40.400 versa.

00:24:42.720 Yeah, Business

00:24:43.340 Insider would

00:24:44.260 be sort of

00:24:45.000 the little

00:24:45.900 attack dog

00:24:47.800 of Bezos.

00:24:53.300 Newspapers are

00:24:54.060 less sensitive

00:24:54.680 to clicks.

00:24:55.900 Well, most of

00:24:57.340 the newspapers

00:24:57.720 are online as

00:24:58.720 well.

00:25:02.080 CNN?

00:25:02.600 I don't

00:25:04.080 think CNN

00:25:04.660 will do it

00:25:05.480 because it

00:25:07.200 doesn't, I

00:25:08.300 don't know if

00:25:08.620 CNN would have

00:25:09.240 enough kick. 0.96

00:25:10.340 The Atlantic.

00:25:11.260 Maybe the

00:25:11.760 Atlantic.

00:25:13.200 Yeah.

00:25:14.740 Possibly the

00:25:15.540 Atlantic.

00:25:16.880 But the

00:25:18.500 odds that

00:25:19.140 there's nobody

00:25:19.800 assigned to

00:25:20.780 write a

00:25:21.100 hit piece on

00:25:21.640 me right now

00:25:22.260 are very low.

00:25:24.180 What do you

00:25:24.840 think?

00:25:25.200 What are the

00:25:25.920 odds that no

00:25:27.300 one anywhere at

00:25:28.060 a major publication

00:25:29.000 has been assigned

00:25:29.980 or has

00:25:31.020 volunteered to

00:25:32.480 do a hit

00:25:32.940 piece on me?

00:25:34.620 It's pretty low.

00:25:36.480 Yeah, somebody's

00:25:37.080 coming for me.

00:25:38.120 And the reason

00:25:38.720 would be that

00:25:39.440 if they think I

00:25:41.340 have any

00:25:42.000 influence over

00:25:42.660 anything.

00:25:42.980 you're not

00:25:52.060 worthy.

00:25:53.500 Maybe not.

00:25:54.940 Maybe not.

00:25:56.520 That's right.

00:25:57.200 I'm the rogue

00:25:57.720 cartoonist.

00:26:00.560 So my

00:26:01.460 comics about

00:26:02.320 ESG

00:26:03.100 are in the

00:26:04.700 pipeline.

00:26:05.500 So you're not

00:26:06.040 going to see

00:26:06.360 those until

00:26:07.140 later in

00:26:08.500 September.

00:26:08.960 But remember,

00:26:12.940 I have until

00:26:13.360 the end of

00:26:13.780 the year I

00:26:14.180 promised you

00:26:14.720 to get rid

00:26:15.280 of ESG.

00:26:19.480 Do I have

00:26:20.040 a dead man

00:26:20.580 switch?

00:26:23.400 Is that

00:26:24.440 where I

00:26:24.740 release all

00:26:25.380 the good

00:26:25.760 secrets?

00:26:26.900 Now that

00:26:27.320 would be a

00:26:27.780 good idea.

00:26:29.700 Wouldn't that

00:26:30.260 be a good

00:26:30.600 idea?

00:26:31.540 Do you have

00:26:31.920 any idea how

00:26:32.580 much stuff I

00:26:33.160 know that

00:26:34.640 would be a

00:26:35.900 bad idea if

00:26:36.520 it ever

00:26:36.760 became public?

00:26:39.920 It's quite a

00:26:40.740 bit.

00:26:43.200 But nothing

00:26:44.580 that I need

00:26:45.100 to get out

00:26:45.580 especially.

00:26:56.000 Better release

00:26:57.020 it to locals

00:26:58.140 first.

00:26:58.700 Yeah.

00:27:02.200 Yeah,

00:27:02.760 McAfee said

00:27:03.460 he had a

00:27:03.820 dead man

00:27:04.200 switch but

00:27:04.700 nothing happened.

00:27:05.760 Or did it?

00:27:07.540 Maybe McAfee's

00:27:08.820 dead man

00:27:09.380 switch is not

00:27:10.060 one that

00:27:10.360 you're supposed

00:27:10.700 to know

00:27:11.420 is happening.

00:27:13.000 Maybe just

00:27:13.740 something is

00:27:14.220 happening.

00:27:14.720 You never

00:27:15.000 know.

00:27:19.860 Yeah,

00:27:20.420 most dead

00:27:20.940 man switches

00:27:21.400 don't work.

00:27:26.400 Hoover,

00:27:27.060 blackmail,

00:27:27.660 JFK,

00:27:28.600 allegedly.

00:27:30.620 What's the

00:27:31.240 most harmful

00:27:31.720 thing you

00:27:32.240 know?

00:27:32.500 That's a

00:27:35.180 good question.

00:27:36.200 What's the

00:27:36.520 most harmful

00:27:37.160 thing I

00:27:37.700 know that

00:27:38.280 you don't

00:27:38.720 know?

00:27:39.560 I don't

00:27:40.000 know that

00:27:40.260 any of it's

00:27:40.620 harmful.

00:27:42.220 Probably none

00:27:43.260 of it makes

00:27:43.660 any.

00:27:43.840 If it were

00:27:44.220 harmful, I

00:27:45.000 probably would

00:27:45.780 have told you

00:27:46.260 by now.

00:27:48.220 A lot of it

00:27:48.940 is just how

00:27:49.420 you understand

00:27:50.000 the world.

00:27:51.340 There are a

00:27:51.680 lot of things

00:27:52.220 that you just

00:27:52.940 think are one

00:27:53.940 way that

00:27:54.400 really,

00:27:54.780 really isn't.

00:27:55.640 how many

00:27:59.420 people do

00:27:59.880 you think

00:28:00.160 know the

00:28:01.640 truth of

00:28:02.420 Epstein's

00:28:03.200 death?

00:28:06.260 How many

00:28:06.940 people alive

00:28:08.220 do you think

00:28:08.600 know the

00:28:09.160 truth?

00:28:13.340 Now, that

00:28:14.040 one I don't

00:28:14.560 know.

00:28:15.880 But I can

00:28:16.500 tell you I've

00:28:17.340 heard theories

00:28:18.180 that you

00:28:18.620 haven't heard.

00:28:20.520 But I don't

00:28:21.100 know.

00:28:21.700 I have no

00:28:22.320 way to know

00:28:22.700 what's credible

00:28:23.260 in that.

00:28:24.140 But I've

00:28:24.500 definitely heard

00:28:25.000 things you

00:28:25.380 haven't

00:28:25.620 heard.

00:28:26.640 So that's

00:28:27.440 all I

00:28:27.700 know.

00:28:29.520 But I

00:28:30.060 wouldn't

00:28:30.240 repeat them

00:28:30.760 because I

00:28:31.140 have no

00:28:31.660 way to

00:28:32.160 validate

00:28:33.640 them.

00:28:35.680 Yeah, there's

00:28:36.340 got to be,

00:28:36.920 I think there

00:28:37.460 are at least

00:28:37.780 100 people

00:28:38.580 who know

00:28:39.120 exactly what

00:28:39.960 happened with

00:28:40.520 Epstein.

00:28:41.480 Because if

00:28:42.100 only two or

00:28:42.760 three or

00:28:43.380 whatever knew

00:28:44.620 at some

00:28:46.380 point, that

00:28:47.240 two or three

00:28:47.800 are definitely

00:28:48.260 talking.

00:28:48.620 them.

00:28:55.300 You can't

00:28:55.940 wait to die

00:28:56.460 because you

00:28:56.760 have such

00:28:57.080 a good

00:28:57.320 dead man's

00:28:57.800 witch.

00:28:59.560 The theory

00:29:00.360 on why

00:29:00.800 no prosecutions,

00:29:01.900 it's obvious.

00:29:03.900 It's obvious.

00:29:05.040 There are

00:29:05.340 important people

00:29:06.220 who would be

00:29:06.660 prosecuted.

00:29:08.260 I would say

00:29:08.700 that's obvious.

00:29:09.980 It's exactly

00:29:10.640 what it looks

00:29:11.140 like.

00:29:12.080 Sometimes

00:29:12.480 things are

00:29:13.100 exactly what

00:29:13.740 they look

00:29:14.060 like.

00:29:15.260 And it

00:29:15.780 looks like

00:29:16.980 powerful people

00:29:18.800 are being

00:29:19.180 protected.

00:29:20.080 It's probably

00:29:20.880 exactly that.

00:29:24.180 Yeah, and

00:29:24.780 what difference

00:29:25.240 does it make?

00:29:25.840 I don't know.

00:29:29.840 All right.

00:29:34.620 NATO shape.

00:29:36.720 What's that

00:29:37.340 mean?

00:29:42.220 Milo Yiannopoulos

00:29:43.300 has been going

00:29:43.820 in a long

00:29:44.120 time?

00:29:44.600 Yes, he

00:29:44.900 has.

00:29:49.020 But with

00:29:49.600 100,

00:29:50.120 could there

00:29:50.420 be a

00:29:50.700 whistleblower?

00:29:52.820 Well,

00:29:54.020 you know,

00:29:56.640 I think it's

00:29:57.480 going to come

00:29:57.800 out eventually,

00:29:58.760 don't you?

00:30:03.760 Why did

00:30:04.360 Epstein not

00:30:05.080 have a

00:30:06.760 kill switch?

00:30:08.720 A dead

00:30:09.280 man switch?

00:30:09.920 I think

00:30:10.420 Epstein's

00:30:11.080 dead man

00:30:11.580 switch worked.

00:30:12.360 didn't

00:30:14.060 it?

00:30:15.360 Because the

00:30:16.240 fact that

00:30:18.400 those names

00:30:20.300 didn't come

00:30:20.780 out tells me

00:30:21.520 that something

00:30:22.100 happened behind

00:30:22.880 the scenes.

00:30:30.300 Yeah, well,

00:30:31.320 I don't know.

00:30:32.640 Do we know

00:30:33.120 the Jimmy Hoffa

00:30:33.820 thing yet or

00:30:34.360 no?

00:30:34.540 yeah,

00:30:41.220 Ghislaine got

00:30:42.060 convicted of

00:30:43.260 transporting

00:30:43.800 children to

00:30:44.480 no one

00:30:44.920 effectively.

00:30:50.120 Obama had

00:30:50.860 affairs,

00:30:51.380 somebody's

00:30:51.720 asking?

00:30:52.240 I don't

00:30:52.820 know about

00:30:53.200 any of

00:30:53.460 that.

00:30:53.740 but I

00:30:59.000 do think

00:30:59.700 some

00:31:00.000 Obama

00:31:01.380 surprises

00:31:02.020 are in

00:31:02.520 the

00:31:02.660 future.

00:31:10.560 This is

00:31:11.180 where you

00:31:11.460 come for

00:31:11.860 the best

00:31:12.320 and the

00:31:12.660 worst

00:31:12.900 takes.

00:31:13.760 All right,

00:31:14.080 let me ask

00:31:14.460 you this.

00:31:15.160 What's the

00:31:15.800 worst take

00:31:16.680 you've ever

00:31:17.200 seen me

00:31:17.660 take?

00:31:19.160 The worst

00:31:20.020 take I've

00:31:20.740 ever had.

00:31:21.160 And I

00:31:24.180 think it

00:31:24.440 will be

00:31:24.640 different on

00:31:25.380 what's my

00:31:27.600 worst take?

00:31:30.900 Vaccinations?

00:31:32.120 Now, you

00:31:32.960 do know that

00:31:33.480 on vaccinations

00:31:34.200 I have not

00:31:34.860 been proven

00:31:35.340 wrong,

00:31:35.840 right?

00:31:38.140 So my

00:31:38.880 worst take

00:31:39.740 I have not

00:31:40.180 been proven

00:31:40.620 wrong.

00:31:43.460 Right?

00:31:44.240 Because my

00:31:44.680 take is that

00:31:45.280 the vaccinations

00:31:46.160 would not

00:31:47.100 prevent.

00:31:49.320 I was

00:31:49.980 right.

00:31:51.160 that

00:31:51.680 therapeutics

00:31:52.340 would be

00:31:52.640 important.

00:31:53.580 I was

00:31:54.020 right.

00:31:55.720 And that

00:31:56.460 if I

00:31:56.920 personally

00:31:57.420 got the

00:31:58.120 vaccination,

00:31:59.480 I could

00:31:59.940 travel,

00:32:01.160 but chances

00:32:01.740 are I

00:32:02.080 wouldn't

00:32:02.280 have an

00:32:02.680 adverse

00:32:03.060 effect.

00:32:04.100 And I

00:32:04.780 traveled,

00:32:05.680 and I

00:32:06.060 did not

00:32:06.380 have an

00:32:06.700 adverse

00:32:07.000 effect.

00:32:10.120 I would

00:32:10.760 say that

00:32:11.140 everything I

00:32:11.740 did was

00:32:12.320 right for

00:32:12.820 me,

00:32:13.760 in the

00:32:15.780 sense that

00:32:16.240 I did

00:32:16.600 not encounter

00:32:17.300 a problem

00:32:17.800 yet.

00:32:18.200 now if

00:32:19.340 you're

00:32:19.540 going to

00:32:19.700 say,

00:32:20.000 but Scott,

00:32:21.260 what about

00:32:21.980 that risk

00:32:22.520 of the

00:32:22.860 vaccination

00:32:23.300 will kill

00:32:23.840 you later?

00:32:24.820 Well,

00:32:25.300 then you'd

00:32:25.840 be right.

00:32:26.960 Then you

00:32:27.520 would be

00:32:27.780 right.

00:32:29.060 Wait and

00:32:29.600 see.

00:32:31.220 The

00:32:31.640 slaughter

00:32:31.960 meter?

00:32:33.060 Well,

00:32:33.660 the

00:32:33.820 slaughter

00:32:34.140 meter,

00:32:34.880 if you're

00:32:37.040 talking about

00:32:37.680 2020,

00:32:40.080 you've

00:32:41.200 made a

00:32:41.520 big assumption

00:32:42.100 that the

00:32:43.140 election went

00:32:43.940 the way

00:32:44.460 a normal

00:32:49.200 election should

00:32:50.000 go.

00:32:51.580 I don't

00:32:52.240 think anything

00:32:52.640 like that

00:32:53.060 happened.

00:32:53.900 I think

00:32:54.280 that what

00:32:54.540 happened was

00:32:55.140 that at

00:32:55.580 the very

00:32:55.900 least,

00:32:56.900 the rules

00:32:57.540 were gamed

00:32:58.300 in a legal

00:32:58.900 way,

00:33:00.040 so that any

00:33:00.800 prediction

00:33:01.220 could not

00:33:02.560 have really

00:33:02.880 taken that

00:33:03.380 into account.

00:33:06.740 The Sam

00:33:07.500 Harris defense?

00:33:09.300 No,

00:33:09.900 that's not

00:33:10.260 my worst

00:33:10.660 take.

00:33:12.100 All right.

00:33:17.580 The

00:33:17.740 simulation,

00:33:18.860 well,

00:33:19.380 it's a

00:33:19.740 trillion to

00:33:20.240 want I'm

00:33:20.540 right about

00:33:20.920 that.

00:33:27.660 Zelensky

00:33:28.140 wins with

00:33:28.680 the drones?

00:33:29.280 I think I

00:33:29.780 was right

00:33:30.160 on Ukraine.

00:33:32.060 Do you

00:33:32.580 think I

00:33:32.840 was wrong

00:33:33.220 on Ukraine?

00:33:34.040 I feel

00:33:34.600 like I

00:33:34.920 had the

00:33:35.260 most right

00:33:36.120 prediction

00:33:36.700 on Ukraine

00:33:37.360 of anybody

00:33:38.000 in public.

00:33:40.020 Because I

00:33:40.700 said that

00:33:41.320 Russia,

00:33:42.100 Russia could 0.60

00:33:42.460 not conquer

00:33:43.240 Ukraine,

00:33:44.840 and that

00:33:45.420 if Ukraine

00:33:46.040 had enough

00:33:46.680 weapons,

00:33:47.200 they could

00:33:47.420 even push

00:33:48.000 Russia back 0.98

00:33:48.760 to some

00:33:50.340 other.

00:33:51.180 And at

00:33:51.940 the moment,

00:33:52.560 Russia is 0.79

00:33:53.060 deadlocked.

00:33:54.960 Weapons

00:33:55.520 depots are

00:33:56.560 being destroyed.

00:33:58.460 I don't know.

00:33:59.540 I would say

00:34:00.560 that even

00:34:01.100 being slightly

00:34:02.020 wrong,

00:34:03.260 I had the

00:34:03.820 rightest

00:34:04.260 prediction

00:34:04.680 that Ukraine 0.91

00:34:05.820 would do a

00:34:06.400 better job

00:34:06.860 of defending

00:34:07.380 than the

00:34:08.080 experts said.

00:34:08.680 I would

00:34:10.100 say that's

00:34:10.380 one of

00:34:10.600 my best

00:34:10.980 takes.

00:34:14.740 Release the

00:34:15.400 Kraken.

00:34:16.040 The release

00:34:16.760 the Kraken

00:34:17.280 thing was

00:34:18.340 clearly wrong.

00:34:21.180 And let

00:34:21.420 me say,

00:34:22.220 I was going

00:34:22.900 to talk

00:34:23.180 about that

00:34:23.560 actually,

00:34:24.180 because I

00:34:24.700 think in

00:34:25.540 my wrongness

00:34:26.300 there's

00:34:26.600 something to

00:34:27.120 learn there.

00:34:28.560 Do you

00:34:28.900 remember there

00:34:30.140 was a time

00:34:30.660 when Sidney

00:34:31.360 Powell got

00:34:31.940 involved in

00:34:32.760 the election

00:34:33.200 stuff,

00:34:33.640 and she

00:34:34.720 was coming

00:34:35.240 off her

00:34:35.880 good reputation

00:34:36.980 with General

00:34:38.660 Flynn.

00:34:40.400 And people

00:34:41.300 were talking

00:34:41.880 about her,

00:34:42.460 at least people

00:34:42.980 on the right,

00:34:44.080 were talking

00:34:44.540 about Sidney

00:34:45.120 Powell as

00:34:45.700 sort of a

00:34:46.380 godlike

00:34:47.280 legal figure,

00:34:49.160 a very high

00:34:49.940 level operating

00:34:51.300 legal person.

00:34:52.900 Now, I

00:34:53.400 believed that

00:34:54.080 because I

00:34:57.380 didn't hear

00:34:57.740 anybody say

00:34:58.340 the opposite.

00:34:59.820 There was

00:35:00.320 nobody saying,

00:35:01.340 well, you

00:35:02.300 know, she's

00:35:02.660 not really a

00:35:03.280 real lawyer,

00:35:04.620 she got her

00:35:05.140 law degree

00:35:06.200 in the mail,

00:35:07.920 nothing like

00:35:08.500 that.

00:35:09.780 So if you

00:35:10.600 take the

00:35:11.020 assumption that

00:35:11.700 this is a

00:35:12.280 real high

00:35:13.040 level lawyer,

00:35:14.520 and that

00:35:14.940 real high

00:35:15.500 level lawyer

00:35:16.060 says, I

00:35:16.620 have the

00:35:17.020 goods and

00:35:17.540 I'm going

00:35:17.800 to show

00:35:18.060 them to

00:35:18.320 you, and

00:35:18.640 it's really,

00:35:19.240 really important,

00:35:20.500 you do

00:35:21.800 expect that

00:35:22.400 they have

00:35:22.700 the goods.

00:35:24.320 But here's

00:35:25.100 where I was

00:35:25.620 completely

00:35:26.200 wrong.

00:35:28.680 Sidney

00:35:29.200 Powell's

00:35:29.640 reputation

00:35:30.240 seems to

00:35:30.980 be not

00:35:32.220 exactly

00:35:33.260 matching

00:35:35.040 her actual

00:35:36.320 reality.

00:35:38.400 And I

00:35:39.160 got that

00:35:39.600 completely

00:35:40.060 wrong.

00:35:41.540 Now, that

00:35:41.980 was surprising.

00:35:43.580 That was

00:35:43.900 surprising.

00:35:44.680 Because when

00:35:45.320 I heard the

00:35:46.160 Venezuelan

00:35:48.420 hacking stuff,

00:35:49.780 I knew that

00:35:50.660 was fake the

00:35:51.420 minute I

00:35:51.780 heard it.

00:35:53.640 Do you

00:35:54.220 remember that?

00:35:55.300 So, to

00:35:57.200 my slight

00:35:58.320 credit,

00:35:58.820 it, and

00:36:00.820 let's see if

00:36:01.520 you can

00:36:01.820 handle this

00:36:02.740 nuance.

00:36:04.100 I was 100%

00:36:05.320 wrong that

00:36:06.180 the Kraken

00:36:06.780 would be a

00:36:07.460 real thing,

00:36:08.660 but I was

00:36:10.740 100% right

00:36:11.960 when I heard

00:36:12.860 what the

00:36:13.220 Kraken was

00:36:14.000 that I

00:36:14.600 called

00:36:14.820 bullshit on

00:36:15.480 it.

00:36:16.940 As soon as I

00:36:17.740 heard the

00:36:18.040 Venezuelan

00:36:18.880 general

00:36:19.540 stuff, I

00:36:21.500 said, oh,

00:36:21.880 no, no, I'm

00:36:22.560 out, I'm

00:36:23.140 out, that's

00:36:23.640 not true.

00:36:24.780 That's not

00:36:25.400 true.

00:36:26.880 Now, I'm

00:36:29.160 guessing that

00:36:30.660 Sidney Powell

00:36:31.200 got conned,

00:36:32.200 as somebody

00:36:32.680 just said.

00:36:33.360 I think that

00:36:33.920 somebody who

00:36:34.440 was good at

00:36:35.220 conning got

00:36:37.260 to her.

00:36:39.320 But still,

00:36:41.140 but still, I

00:36:42.180 don't think I

00:36:42.720 would have

00:36:42.940 believed it if

00:36:43.640 I'd been in

00:36:44.120 that situation.

00:36:45.660 I might have

00:36:46.480 played it

00:36:47.360 differently and

00:36:47.960 said something

00:36:48.460 like, well,

00:36:50.120 we've got some

00:36:50.620 really interesting

00:36:51.240 leads, but we

00:36:52.940 don't want to

00:36:53.400 tell you about

00:36:54.000 it until we

00:36:54.500 track them

00:36:55.260 down.

00:36:57.720 So I did

00:36:58.680 not know that

00:36:59.500 she was not

00:37:00.580 operating at

00:37:01.300 the high level.

00:37:02.580 And so I

00:37:03.120 was completely

00:37:03.620 wrong.

00:37:04.820 So I did

00:37:05.540 trust that she

00:37:06.320 would be able

00:37:06.840 to vet

00:37:07.340 information, but

00:37:09.000 that was easy

00:37:10.100 to vet.

00:37:11.120 That one was

00:37:11.660 easy.

00:37:12.940 You could just

00:37:13.480 hear it and

00:37:14.020 go, no, no,

00:37:15.460 that's not

00:37:15.880 true.

00:37:18.140 So, yes.

00:37:19.860 So that, if

00:37:21.160 I were to make

00:37:22.800 my own list

00:37:23.700 of things

00:37:24.940 that I was

00:37:25.660 most wrong

00:37:26.540 about, I

00:37:27.100 would put the

00:37:27.660 Kraken at

00:37:28.320 the top of

00:37:28.780 my list.

00:37:32.240 Similar to

00:37:32.840 how I got

00:37:33.320 conned by

00:37:34.440 Peter Thiel,

00:37:35.160 what would

00:37:35.460 be an

00:37:35.740 example of

00:37:36.280 that?

00:37:37.620 In what

00:37:38.020 way did

00:37:38.460 Peter Thiel

00:37:39.360 con me?

00:37:40.500 I don't

00:37:40.860 even know

00:37:41.080 what the

00:37:41.280 topic is.

00:37:42.560 What did

00:37:42.980 Peter Thiel

00:37:43.480 say that

00:37:44.220 I bought

00:37:46.900 into?

00:37:47.180 You'd be

00:37:57.480 hunted.

00:38:00.080 Well, I

00:38:00.860 think most

00:38:01.260 people accept

00:38:02.980 that hunted

00:38:03.640 has actually

00:38:04.560 happened.

00:38:12.640 Well, you

00:38:13.280 remember you're

00:38:14.020 adding the

00:38:14.540 literally.

00:38:14.880 I said

00:38:16.700 Republicans

00:38:17.220 would be

00:38:17.700 hunted, and

00:38:20.020 Republicans say

00:38:21.180 that that's

00:38:21.640 happened.

00:38:22.960 You added a

00:38:24.440 new word,

00:38:25.180 literally, to

00:38:26.780 make it look

00:38:27.260 like they're

00:38:27.640 wearing hunting

00:38:28.560 outfits and

00:38:29.400 rifles.

00:38:30.700 So you had

00:38:31.460 to add a

00:38:31.980 word to

00:38:32.380 make me

00:38:32.720 wrong.

00:38:34.760 You see

00:38:35.480 that if you

00:38:36.680 had to add

00:38:37.960 a word to

00:38:38.480 what I

00:38:38.760 said, and

00:38:39.820 it's the

00:38:40.220 added word

00:38:40.960 that makes

00:38:41.380 me wrong,

00:38:42.640 that's not

00:38:43.320 really my

00:38:43.760 problem.

00:38:44.080 If you

00:38:45.260 thought

00:38:45.560 hunted meant

00:38:46.500 literally like

00:38:49.060 that rascally

00:38:49.880 wabbit, you 0.99

00:38:51.020 know, Elmer

00:38:51.720 Fudd, and

00:38:52.320 he'd have

00:38:52.700 like a

00:38:53.000 shotgun, if

00:38:54.180 that's what

00:38:54.500 you thought

00:38:54.820 the tweet

00:38:55.240 meant, I'm

00:38:55.700 not sure

00:38:56.000 that's my

00:38:56.480 responsibility,

00:38:57.020 is it, if

00:38:58.260 you took

00:38:58.560 that literally?

00:39:02.160 But it's

00:39:02.740 been totally

00:39:03.220 true, yeah,

00:39:04.220 in a

00:39:04.800 metaphorical

00:39:05.400 sense.

00:39:05.720 All right,

00:39:10.200 well, you

00:39:10.560 don't have

00:39:10.880 too many, so

00:39:12.480 so far your

00:39:13.420 criticisms of

00:39:14.700 me are

00:39:15.180 either misinformed

00:39:16.740 or the ones

00:39:17.320 I agree

00:39:17.720 with, so I

00:39:18.680 think we're

00:39:19.040 largely on

00:39:19.860 the same

00:39:20.180 page, except

00:39:20.820 for the

00:39:21.120 things you

00:39:21.440 were

00:39:21.660 imagining.

00:39:27.460 You

00:39:27.980 suggested

00:39:29.060 that the

00:39:29.780 Kraken was

00:39:30.480 irrefutable

00:39:31.100 data analysis.

00:39:32.080 yes, well, I

00:39:36.500 didn't say

00:39:36.820 irrefutable, but

00:39:37.680 again, you're

00:39:38.300 adding, you

00:39:38.840 had to add a

00:39:39.440 word, didn't

00:39:39.920 you?

00:39:40.720 Do you notice

00:39:41.260 how people have

00:39:41.840 to add words

00:39:42.740 to make me

00:39:43.300 wrong?

00:39:44.440 I never would

00:39:45.220 have said

00:39:45.560 irrefutable.

00:39:47.300 If I'd said

00:39:48.140 that, I would

00:39:48.600 be wrong.

00:39:50.060 But the

00:39:51.420 data analysis

00:39:52.160 did show

00:39:52.860 great

00:39:53.280 irregularities.

00:39:55.240 In my

00:39:55.920 opinion, those

00:39:57.140 irregularities do

00:39:58.280 in fact make

00:40:00.880 the case.

00:40:02.080 But since I

00:40:03.600 don't want to

00:40:04.000 be banned

00:40:04.460 from social

00:40:05.040 media, I

00:40:05.780 will say

00:40:06.260 unambiguously,

00:40:07.920 no court has

00:40:08.780 found any

00:40:09.260 fraud this

00:40:09.740 big enough.

00:40:10.920 The parts

00:40:11.600 that worry

00:40:11.980 me are the

00:40:12.900 places that

00:40:14.440 were reliably

00:40:15.420 voted one

00:40:16.220 way and then

00:40:16.900 they went a

00:40:17.720 different way.

00:40:19.300 To me, those

00:40:20.240 are convincing

00:40:21.380 signals that

00:40:23.520 something was

00:40:24.340 up that we

00:40:25.340 don't understand.

00:40:26.640 Doesn't mean

00:40:27.280 the election

00:40:27.680 was rigged.

00:40:29.580 Doesn't mean

00:40:30.080 that.

00:40:30.380 And there's

00:40:31.260 no proof

00:40:32.200 of that.

00:40:33.580 But those

00:40:34.340 irregularities to

00:40:35.440 me are

00:40:36.360 unexplained

00:40:38.200 even now.

00:40:41.680 You

00:40:42.360 literally said

00:40:43.160 literally.

00:40:45.840 I think I'd

00:40:46.820 have to see

00:40:47.240 that.

00:40:52.340 Give me my

00:40:53.540 exact proof

00:40:54.620 so I may be

00:40:55.260 talking about

00:40:55.700 two different

00:40:56.140 things.

00:40:58.240 Tell me my

00:40:59.020 exact statement

00:40:59.700 and then I'll

00:41:00.460 tell you if

00:41:01.240 we're talking

00:41:01.880 about the

00:41:02.160 same thing.

00:41:06.940 Because that

00:41:07.540 doesn't, it's

00:41:08.240 not the way I

00:41:08.780 talk.

00:41:09.340 I wouldn't use

00:41:09.940 literally in that

00:41:10.900 context the one

00:41:11.900 you're talking

00:41:12.340 about.

00:41:13.000 But I may have

00:41:13.560 used it in some

00:41:14.180 other context.

00:41:15.060 Covington kids

00:41:21.760 being a-holes. 0.96

00:41:23.780 Yeah, I was

00:41:24.300 wrong about that

00:41:25.080 for 24 hours.

00:41:29.740 I don't know.

00:41:30.780 Do you think

00:41:32.620 that if somebody's

00:41:33.760 wrong for 24

00:41:34.760 hours and they

00:41:35.640 immediately correct,

00:41:37.900 is that a bad

00:41:39.060 take?

00:41:39.400 because we're

00:41:42.220 all wrong in

00:41:42.780 the first 48

00:41:43.500 hours.

00:41:44.840 Pretty much

00:41:45.440 everybody's wrong

00:41:46.200 on day one

00:41:47.040 because nobody

00:41:48.520 knows anything.

00:41:49.940 So I would

00:41:51.060 agree that's

00:41:51.500 wrong, but if

00:41:52.260 you were to

00:41:52.640 rank the

00:41:53.320 Covington kids

00:41:54.180 wrongness,

00:41:55.840 that'd be like

00:41:56.380 a 1 out of

00:41:56.980 10.

00:41:57.980 But definitely

00:41:58.540 wrong.

00:41:59.580 Like I'm not

00:42:00.260 saying it was

00:42:00.660 right, it was

00:42:01.160 completely wrong.

00:42:02.320 But in terms of

00:42:03.220 its importance,

00:42:04.500 1 out of

00:42:05.020 10.

00:42:05.200 1 out of 10.

00:42:05.240 1 out of 10.

00:42:05.260 1 out of 10.

00:42:09.400 If you listen

00:42:18.720 to the

00:42:19.120 change with

00:42:19.640 new information,

00:42:20.500 which is good.

00:42:22.880 All right.

00:42:26.100 Sam Harris

00:42:26.940 about the

00:42:27.320 Hunter laptop

00:42:28.080 and yeah,

00:42:28.840 Sam Harris

00:42:29.300 gets 48 hours

00:42:30.300 to clarify.

00:42:31.320 Everybody

00:42:31.600 gets 48 hours.

00:42:39.400 Oh, you said

00:42:46.400 Kamala was

00:42:47.300 one of the

00:42:47.620 most effective

00:42:48.380 public speakers.

00:42:49.820 Yeah, I was

00:42:50.420 definitely wrong

00:42:51.040 about Kamala

00:42:51.760 Harris being

00:42:52.720 capable.

00:42:54.040 I still don't

00:42:54.880 know what went

00:42:55.500 wrong.

00:42:57.160 Can anybody

00:42:58.020 explain why

00:42:58.980 she seemed

00:42:59.600 capable in

00:43:00.860 Senate hearings

00:43:01.720 before she ran

00:43:02.560 for office,

00:43:03.080 but clearly

00:43:04.220 is not capable?

00:43:06.320 How was it

00:43:07.040 she, how did 1.00

00:43:08.280 she win so 0.95

00:43:09.880 many elections

00:43:10.480 that she

00:43:10.920 became senator

00:43:11.720 when we

00:43:15.920 observed that

00:43:16.740 she doesn't

00:43:17.080 have any

00:43:17.420 qualities that

00:43:18.240 would suggest

00:43:18.700 she could have

00:43:19.420 made it that

00:43:19.880 far?

00:43:20.980 I know what

00:43:21.480 you're going

00:43:21.680 to say,

00:43:22.020 she slept

00:43:22.600 with people,

00:43:23.260 blah, blah,

00:43:23.600 blah, but I

00:43:24.680 don't think it's

00:43:25.100 that.

00:43:25.780 I mean, she

00:43:26.160 won the

00:43:26.560 elections.

00:43:33.320 Yeah.

00:43:33.760 So the

00:43:37.440 weird thing

00:43:37.940 about my

00:43:38.400 Kamala Harris

00:43:39.240 prediction is

00:43:40.900 it was the

00:43:41.700 most accurate

00:43:42.680 prediction that

00:43:43.820 was totally

00:43:44.300 wrong.

00:43:45.420 It was totally

00:43:45.960 wrong, so she

00:43:47.000 did not become

00:43:47.600 the presidential

00:43:48.180 candidate, but

00:43:49.640 she did become

00:43:50.300 president for

00:43:51.140 two hours.

00:43:52.720 It's the

00:43:53.180 weirdest wrong

00:43:53.980 prediction I

00:43:54.580 ever made.

00:43:55.560 I've never

00:43:55.960 been more

00:43:56.460 right on a

00:43:57.620 prediction that

00:43:58.120 was completely

00:43:58.640 wrong.

00:43:59.020 Yeah.

00:43:59.200 Yeah.

00:43:59.220 Yeah.

00:43:59.300 Yeah.

00:43:59.320 Yeah.

00:43:59.380 Yeah.

00:43:59.780 Yeah.

00:43:59.800 Yeah.

00:43:59.820 Yeah.

00:43:59.840 Yeah.

00:43:59.860 Yeah.

00:43:59.900 Yeah.

00:43:59.980 Yeah.

00:44:04.500 She won in

00:44:05.360 California, but

00:44:06.080 still, even in

00:44:07.840 California, she 0.99

00:44:08.540 had to run

00:44:09.000 against people

00:44:10.300 who could

00:44:10.700 talk.

00:44:12.000 I just don't

00:44:12.840 understand.

00:44:13.600 Maybe something

00:44:14.240 happened to

00:44:14.820 her.

00:44:15.920 You know, maybe

00:44:16.640 did she hit

00:44:18.240 her head? 0.81

00:44:20.300 Oh, you know

00:44:21.040 what?

00:44:21.220 That would be an

00:44:21.680 interesting

00:44:21.980 question.

00:44:24.680 Has Kamala 0.88

00:44:25.520 Harris ever

00:44:26.040 had an

00:44:27.160 accident where

00:44:27.820 she banged

00:44:28.620 her head, like

00:44:29.780 in the last

00:44:30.200 several years?

00:44:32.400 That's a

00:44:33.020 serious question

00:44:33.640 by the way.

00:44:34.220 Because what

00:44:34.780 we observe

00:44:35.300 doesn't look

00:44:35.940 like she

00:44:37.120 could have

00:44:37.580 always been

00:44:38.140 this way.

00:44:40.720 Somebody says

00:44:41.460 it's the

00:44:41.800 vaccination.

00:44:47.240 Let's tie it

00:44:48.060 all together.

00:44:49.880 You know, I

00:44:50.620 think she

00:44:50.940 doesn't have

00:44:51.320 enough

00:44:51.500 vitamin D.

00:44:54.620 I think

00:44:55.260 the kraken

00:44:55.780 got her.

00:44:56.980 I think

00:44:57.320 the kraken

00:44:57.920 hurt her 0.93

00:44:59.380 brain.

00:45:00.280 But quite

00:45:01.020 seriously, she

00:45:01.760 doesn't look

00:45:02.160 like the

00:45:02.460 same person.

00:45:04.140 So it

00:45:05.260 looks like

00:45:05.600 something

00:45:05.860 happened.

00:45:07.220 And if I

00:45:07.840 found out

00:45:08.260 she had

00:45:08.580 banged her 1.00

00:45:09.000 head,

00:45:11.980 could somebody

00:45:12.860 look that

00:45:13.320 up?

00:45:14.760 It's a

00:45:15.260 serious

00:45:15.520 question.

00:45:15.980 Did she

00:45:16.260 have any

00:45:16.680 kind of

00:45:17.100 accident

00:45:17.680 where she

00:45:19.300 had a

00:45:19.560 head injury?

00:45:20.240 Because it

00:45:20.600 looks like

00:45:21.080 it.

00:45:21.340 It really

00:45:21.700 does look

00:45:22.160 like she

00:45:22.440 had a

00:45:22.600 head

00:45:22.740 injury.

00:45:24.720 Headboard.

00:45:25.200 All right.

00:45:30.260 That is the

00:45:31.180 inappropriate

00:45:31.720 joke of

00:45:32.460 the day.

00:45:33.520 The

00:45:33.860 inappropriate

00:45:34.540 joke of

00:45:35.020 the day

00:45:35.260 is that

00:45:36.040 Kamala

00:45:36.680 Harris's

00:45:37.140 head

00:45:37.340 injury

00:45:37.640 came from

00:45:38.120 the

00:45:38.280 head

00:45:39.140 board

00:45:39.360 of the

00:45:39.560 bed.

00:45:42.140 I do

00:45:42.800 not approve

00:45:43.360 of such

00:45:43.800 jokes.

00:45:44.760 They are

00:45:45.140 sexist, 0.84

00:45:46.220 probably

00:45:46.820 racist.

00:45:48.820 So you

00:45:49.460 should be

00:45:49.720 ashamed of

00:45:50.100 yourself

00:45:50.420 for making

00:45:51.740 me laugh

00:45:52.200 like that.

00:45:52.640 now here's

00:45:54.540 one thing

00:45:54.900 I'm never

00:45:55.280 going to

00:45:55.860 apologize

00:45:57.380 for.

00:45:58.840 I'd like

00:45:59.360 to just

00:45:59.620 put it

00:45:59.860 out there.

00:46:00.500 I'm never

00:46:00.920 going to

00:46:01.280 apologize

00:46:01.680 for laughing

00:46:02.520 at an

00:46:03.060 inappropriate

00:46:03.560 joke.

00:46:05.380 Because it's

00:46:06.120 the inappropriate

00:46:06.740 part that

00:46:07.320 makes me

00:46:07.680 laugh.

00:46:09.120 If the

00:46:09.720 joke were

00:46:10.100 not

00:46:10.380 inappropriate

00:46:10.940 it wouldn't

00:46:11.600 even be

00:46:12.540 anything.

00:46:13.560 It's the

00:46:14.120 fact that

00:46:14.500 it's

00:46:14.640 completely

00:46:15.080 socially

00:46:15.660 unacceptable

00:46:16.400 that makes

00:46:17.440 it funny

00:46:17.820 in the

00:46:18.060 first place.

00:46:19.020 I'm not

00:46:19.280 going to

00:46:19.480 apologize

00:46:19.800 for laughing

00:46:20.520 at something

00:46:20.940 that's

00:46:21.200 socially

00:46:21.520 unacceptable.

00:46:23.620 That always

00:46:24.340 makes me

00:46:24.760 laugh.

00:46:25.600 Even if

00:46:26.180 it were

00:46:26.380 about me.

00:46:27.640 Like even

00:46:28.200 if I'm

00:46:28.580 the target

00:46:29.020 of the

00:46:29.340 joke.

00:46:30.260 Funny is

00:46:30.720 funny.

00:46:31.600 If it's

00:46:31.960 inappropriate

00:46:32.400 it's

00:46:32.680 inappropriate.

00:46:33.460 It makes

00:46:33.720 me laugh.

00:46:37.500 So I'm

00:46:38.140 going to

00:46:38.340 laugh at

00:46:38.760 anything I

00:46:39.200 think is

00:46:39.500 funny and

00:46:40.020 I'm going

00:46:40.260 to associate

00:46:41.180 in any

00:46:41.900 way with

00:46:42.420 anybody I

00:46:43.040 want.

00:46:43.800 And none

00:46:44.240 of those

00:46:44.580 are your

00:46:44.900 business.

00:46:46.500 I like

00:46:47.040 to just

00:46:47.500 re-emphasize

00:46:48.180 that as

00:46:48.860 often as

00:46:49.240 possible.

00:46:52.640 what's

00:46:58.700 on the

00:46:59.000 bottom

00:46:59.300 shelf

00:46:59.740 behind

00:47:00.160 me?

00:47:02.380 Headphones

00:47:02.940 that I'm

00:47:04.620 not using.

00:47:12.680 Kamala can

00:47:13.420 dish out

00:47:13.840 the

00:47:14.000 criticism

00:47:14.460 but can

00:47:15.400 she take

00:47:15.800 it?

00:47:16.100 Sure.

00:47:16.300 Heinlein

00:47:20.460 says all

00:47:21.120 humor is

00:47:21.660 meant to

00:47:21.980 hurt

00:47:22.140 someone.

00:47:23.460 Is that

00:47:23.880 true?

00:47:24.560 That all

00:47:25.020 humor is

00:47:25.700 meant to

00:47:26.160 hurt

00:47:26.400 someone?

00:47:29.500 It's

00:47:30.020 pretty close

00:47:30.500 to the

00:47:30.720 true.

00:47:41.260 She came

00:47:42.060 back looking

00:47:42.620 different.

00:47:43.720 Yeah she

00:47:44.020 did.

00:47:44.340 I assume

00:47:44.660 that was

00:47:45.020 just some

00:47:45.480 cosmetic

00:47:46.120 work.

00:47:53.940 Not

00:47:54.380 dad jokes?

00:47:55.420 Yeah dad

00:47:55.920 jokes don't

00:47:56.380 have any

00:47:56.720 target that's

00:47:57.300 true.

00:48:00.700 Guy walks

00:48:01.520 into a

00:48:01.880 bar and

00:48:02.300 says ouch.

00:48:03.440 Okay.

00:48:07.600 Alright well

00:48:08.280 I don't have

00:48:08.660 anything else

00:48:09.120 to say so

00:48:09.560 I won't

00:48:09.840 keep you.

00:48:11.420 August is

00:48:12.400 a slow

00:48:13.120 news month

00:48:13.820 for all

00:48:14.960 the obvious

00:48:15.500 reasons.

00:48:16.360 As soon

00:48:16.760 as we

00:48:16.960 get out

00:48:17.240 of the

00:48:17.480 August

00:48:17.920 doldrums

00:48:18.920 well then

00:48:20.600 we'll have

00:48:20.960 some fun

00:48:21.440 because the

00:48:23.160 election is

00:48:23.620 going to

00:48:23.800 really heat

00:48:24.220 up September

00:48:25.320 going forward.

00:48:30.080 Alright

00:48:30.640 and that's

00:48:32.840 all for now.

00:48:33.860 I'll talk to

00:48:34.540 you tomorrow.

00:48:35.660 Jeffrey

00:48:41.120 come on.

00:48:41.820 Bye.

00:48:44.160 Bye.

00:48:45.120 Bye.

00:48:45.700 Bye.

00:48:46.100 Bye.

00:48:46.720 Bye.

00:48:51.000 Bye.

00:48:53.120 Bye.

00:48:56.500 Bye.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - August 21, 2022

Episode 1842 Scott Adams： Republicans Might Have Trouble In The Midterms, The Big Bang Might Be Fake

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript