Real Coffee with Scott Adams - February 11, 2023


Episode 2016 Scott Adams： UFO Shot Down？ Did Biden Start Interplanetary War？ Project Veritas & More


Episode Stats


Length

43 minutes

Words per minute

140.56126

Word count

6,134

Sentence count

527

Harmful content

Misogyny

9

sentences flagged

Hate speech

16

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

An alien spaceship has been shot down over Alaska, and the government has no idea why. Is it an alien spaceship or is it something else entirely? Or is it the work of another planet, and it s trying to tell us something important?

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.800 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of civilization, as long as it lasts.
00:00:07.880 And it might not last much longer, but we'll get to that in a minute.
00:00:12.060 Now, did you see what I have in my hands?
00:00:15.300 Yes, documents, paper, printed from my own new HP printer that has Wi-Fi and everything,
00:00:21.600 and everything's going well today.
00:00:23.580 Nothing can stop me, except possibly an alien invasion.
00:00:27.420 But if you'd like to raise your spirits today, and I think you do,
00:00:33.060 all you need is a cupper, a mugger, a glass, a tanker, a chalice, a stein, a kenteen jug, a flask, a vessel of any kind,
00:00:39.120 fill it with your favorite liquid I like, coffee.
00:00:42.720 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day,
00:00:47.220 the thing that makes everything better on this planet and beyond.
00:00:51.480 It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now.
00:00:57.420 Ah, yeah.
00:01:02.080 That is the happiness of a new printer that's working perfectly.
00:01:08.240 So thank you, HP, for the help.
00:01:10.680 Let's go private over here on local.
00:01:14.140 Sorry, you're private now.
00:01:15.060 Well, let's see.
00:01:20.600 Is there anything happening in the news?
00:01:27.400 Let's see.
00:01:29.520 Find the front.
00:01:30.500 Oh, looks like it prints on both sides, so I don't know what the hell I'm doing.
00:01:34.280 Now, was it a few weeks ago?
00:01:37.780 Let me ask you this.
00:01:39.000 I need to do a little check of sanity here.
00:01:41.920 Am I the only one who noticed that just a few weeks ago, a lot of people were saying
00:01:49.840 on Twitter, I think there's going to be a UFO event to distract us from the news?
00:01:56.160 Did anybody see that besides me?
00:02:00.600 I didn't imagine that, right?
00:02:02.820 There were, in fact, there were, okay, I'm seeing confirmations in the comments.
00:02:07.680 There were, in fact, people saying, I think there's going to be a UFO event to distract us from Ukraine and inflation.
00:02:14.280 So, in the news, it's possible that another planet is watching Earth because AI is becoming conscious and they think it would be a good show.
00:02:31.340 Maybe.
00:02:32.580 Maybe.
00:02:33.460 So, as you know, there was a long cylindrical object at 40,000 feet over Alaska.
00:02:42.900 And so, Biden ordered it, it shot down.
00:02:46.520 We don't know what it is.
00:02:50.500 But it's a long cylindrical object.
00:02:55.480 And I asked myself this.
00:02:57.140 If we're actually living in a simulation, you know, suppose this reality is just a simulation,
00:03:03.680 and it wanted to send you a message, kind of some foreshadowing,
00:03:07.760 how would it send you, if we are a simulation,
00:03:12.120 how would it send you the message that your planet is screwed?
00:03:17.920 Well, I don't know.
00:03:19.340 Probably not in words, because that would be creepy.
00:03:21.980 So, you'd probably have to send you a sign.
00:03:23.500 So, one way to do it would be to send a long cylindrical object to penetrate Mother Earth 0.98
00:03:30.600 in a place in Alaska, near Alaska, called, and I'm not making this up,
00:03:37.220 CUMTOWN.
00:03:38.480 C-U-M-T-O-W-N. 1.00
00:03:42.180 Yeah, they brought it down in CUMTOWN.
00:03:44.780 All the way down in CUMTOWN.
00:03:46.420 Now, that's how I'd do it.
00:03:50.440 If I were in charge of the simulation and I wanted to tell you,
00:03:53.100 your planet is totally screwed,
00:03:55.220 I'd send that long cylindrical object to penetrate Mother Earth in CUMTOWN. 0.79
00:03:59.180 That's how I'd do it.
00:04:01.260 Now, there's no word on which members of the military are going to retrieve the wreckage,
00:04:08.460 but I'm guessing seamen.
00:04:11.660 Seamen.
00:04:12.060 I think they're going to send the seamen to get the wreckage in CUMTOWN.
00:04:19.840 All right, so, Kirby was asked, Kirby, you know, Biden's guy,
00:04:29.320 why did they bring this one down when they didn't bring the other one down?
00:04:33.900 And he gave a good reason.
00:04:35.280 I didn't think there would be a good reason.
00:04:37.280 You know, I thought it was going to be, oh, we had to shoot this one down
00:04:39.940 so it didn't look bad politically.
00:04:42.060 I thought it was going to be some political reason, right?
00:04:44.640 Some, like, BS political reason.
00:04:46.460 But it turns out there's a very good logical reason
00:04:49.860 why they shot this one down soon, whereas the other one they waited.
00:04:54.560 And it's the size of the payload.
00:04:59.460 Because the other one was three buses,
00:05:01.240 and if you drop three buses on a huge, barren area in the United States,
00:05:07.040 it's going to have, you know, a lot of debris field.
00:05:09.600 But if you take something down over a huge, unpopulated area in the United States
00:05:14.940 that's the size of a car,
00:05:18.040 not as much debris.
00:05:20.940 Totally convincing reason.
00:05:24.120 Totally convincing.
00:05:25.020 No, a payload meaning just the structure that's attached to it.
00:05:28.580 That's maybe the worst reason I've ever heard.
00:05:34.600 Because from the perspective of the entire United States,
00:05:39.740 the difference in debris field between three buses and one car
00:05:43.900 is not really significant.
00:05:47.480 Not really significant.
00:05:48.560 So, um, we know that we're being lied to.
00:05:54.820 But maybe just for political purposes.
00:05:58.480 And here's my next question.
00:06:01.080 How many of these things have been flying around all the time?
00:06:05.480 Do you think it's a coincidence whether we found one to shoot down
00:06:08.500 just when Biden needed to look tough?
00:06:11.080 Oh, at the exact time that Biden wanted to look like he could be decisive,
00:06:16.180 there it was.
00:06:17.780 Oh, right over Alaska, right where he wanted it to be.
00:06:22.100 So how lucky that he got a do-over.
00:06:24.600 How lucky, really?
00:06:26.600 Or was it?
00:06:27.760 Now, of course, on Twitter, people are posting videos of other UFOs
00:06:32.520 that look just like it.
00:06:33.600 I'm not sure I would believe any of the other videos that look just like it.
00:06:39.740 Those cylindrical objects.
00:06:41.800 But I will just note that there are a lot of videos of said objects on Twitter.
00:06:48.200 I'm not sure I believe any of it.
00:06:51.560 So what are you to make of this?
00:06:54.280 How many of you think it's an alien object?
00:06:57.440 Raise your hands.
00:06:58.780 Alien from another planet.
00:07:01.460 Oh, damn it, nobody believes it.
00:07:06.480 Oh, one, okay.
00:07:08.280 Well, I was hoping that we would be far more accepting of this.
00:07:13.540 How about a weather balloon?
00:07:15.760 Who's going to go with weather balloon?
00:07:18.160 Anybody?
00:07:19.060 Weather balloon?
00:07:21.000 Apparently, it could not navigate,
00:07:24.300 was unmanned, and did not have sensors on it.
00:07:31.460 Yeah, maybe.
00:07:34.160 Maybe a weather balloon.
00:07:35.360 Now, here's a question for you,
00:07:37.220 and I don't know the answer to this question.
00:07:39.740 If you were to take an object like, let's say, a parachute,
00:07:45.140 and let's say that parachute, you know,
00:07:47.540 got lifted up in a heavy wind, a hurricane or something,
00:07:50.920 is it possible for any natural object to come from the ground
00:07:56.140 and then just float around in space for a long period of time?
00:08:01.040 Can that ever happen just based on air currents alone?
00:08:06.680 No?
00:08:07.200 Yeah, I've seen, haven't you seen plastic trash bags
00:08:12.880 that are flying around for a while?
00:08:14.740 Your ego.
00:08:17.180 Haven't we all seen plastic trash bags flying around
00:08:20.040 and it seems like they shouldn't stay up there?
00:08:22.700 Not at 40,000 feet?
00:08:25.520 Why not?
00:08:26.300 Why not?
00:08:26.820 I would think at 40,000 feet it would be more likely
00:08:29.280 because there'd be greater wind.
00:08:30.860 I'm seeing some people say yes, but most of you say no.
00:08:36.380 Depends on the density.
00:08:37.660 I don't know.
00:08:38.480 Maybe.
00:08:39.940 Maybe.
00:08:41.000 Could a weather balloon survive at 40,000?
00:08:45.480 Probably.
00:08:48.840 Scott is Mick West.
00:08:51.580 All right, well, we don't know the answer to that.
00:08:53.960 Let's talk about John Fetterman, Senator Fetterman.
00:08:57.180 And so the New York Times is reporting
00:08:59.420 that he might have some permanent mental problems
00:09:03.080 because of his stroke,
00:09:04.820 in part because maybe he didn't rest when he should have.
00:09:09.000 Instead, he campaigned.
00:09:11.040 What do you think of that?
00:09:12.520 Do you think Fetterman permanently disabled himself
00:09:19.320 by campaigning?
00:09:22.300 Possibly.
00:09:23.320 Possibly.
00:09:23.760 And do you want a senator who would make that bad of a decision?
00:09:28.840 Well, he would have made the decision while he was disabled, right? 1.00
00:09:32.900 Because we don't know the quality of his thinking at that point.
00:09:36.880 So it looks like, as Glenn Greenwald points out,
00:09:40.420 that once again, for the third time in a row,
00:09:44.000 the corporate news has lied to us
00:09:46.640 to change the results of an election.
00:09:48.620 So you've got Hunter's laptop.
00:09:53.000 You've got the Russia collusion.
00:09:57.160 And you've got now the Fetterman.
00:10:00.120 Oh, Fetterman's fine.
00:10:01.300 He'll be fine.
00:10:02.660 So that's three cases where the corporate news apparently,
00:10:08.160 and this would be Greenwald's take,
00:10:10.120 apparently lied to you intentionally
00:10:11.760 to change the results of the election.
00:10:13.900 That's so ordinary now,
00:10:18.080 it doesn't even shock me, does it?
00:10:21.380 We're all just like so beaten down by it.
00:10:24.540 We're all like abused spouses at this point.
00:10:27.560 You don't know why we won't leave.
00:10:29.620 You just get used to anything.
00:10:31.540 I mean, once you get used to it,
00:10:32.980 you're like, well, yeah, they do that.
00:10:36.900 It's been happening for decades?
00:10:38.560 Probably, yes.
00:10:39.160 And I remember that reporter
00:10:47.000 who got attacked for reporting honestly
00:10:49.460 that he didn't seem to be able to communicate.
00:10:52.920 And everybody said, no, you bad reporter.
00:10:55.660 You're not supposed to say you honestly think
00:10:57.960 he couldn't communicate with you when you talked to him.
00:11:01.920 All right.
00:11:05.800 There's not much to say about that.
00:11:07.220 All right, Project Veritas.
00:11:09.400 Correct me if I'm wrong,
00:11:10.960 but we still don't know exactly why James O'Keefe
00:11:13.580 was put on paid leave
00:11:15.700 by the board of Project Veritas, right?
00:11:19.000 Is that still true that we don't know?
00:11:22.380 Why? All right.
00:11:25.120 Let me ask you this.
00:11:26.460 How many believe that he showed a video
00:11:28.520 that proves that Pfizer is conducting
00:11:31.240 gain-of-function research?
00:11:33.800 How many of you believe that's your movie?
00:11:36.420 In your movie, is this a true statement?
00:11:39.160 That the undercover video
00:11:41.080 proves that Pfizer was involved
00:11:44.280 with gain-of-function?
00:11:50.860 Oh, interesting.
00:11:52.620 You're all saying no,
00:11:53.640 but some are saying yep.
00:11:56.780 Some say yes, some say no.
00:11:59.780 Now, how could we all watch the same stuff,
00:12:03.360 and some of you think it was proven
00:12:05.560 and some think it wasn't?
00:12:09.700 All right.
00:12:10.080 I have a hypothesis
00:12:13.520 for what the drama is all about.
00:12:17.100 You ready for this?
00:12:17.780 This is just speculation.
00:12:20.400 This is rank speculation.
00:12:23.060 So you shouldn't put too much credibility on it.
00:12:25.320 But it goes like this.
00:12:28.320 Let me get a fact check from you.
00:12:31.280 Did James O'Keefe present this video
00:12:34.560 as evidence slash proof
00:12:38.080 that Pfizer is doing
00:12:39.880 or was interested in
00:12:41.780 gain-of-function research?
00:12:43.320 Did he present it as them
00:12:46.740 doing gain-of-function research?
00:12:50.840 Now, look at your answers.
00:12:52.140 There's some yes, some no.
00:12:54.680 I thought yes.
00:12:56.700 I thought it was presented
00:12:58.120 in a way that you were supposed
00:13:00.640 to interpret it
00:13:01.520 as gain-of-function research.
00:13:03.900 Now, most of you said
00:13:05.240 that that wasn't on the video.
00:13:07.560 Right?
00:13:08.220 So I saw most of you say
00:13:09.460 that the video didn't say that.
00:13:11.960 But many of you are saying
00:13:13.420 that he claims it says that.
00:13:15.540 Would that be grounds
00:13:17.200 for the board to remove him?
00:13:19.860 Because I've got to think
00:13:21.440 Pfizer's coming after
00:13:22.520 all of them with lawyers.
00:13:25.080 You don't think the board
00:13:26.040 of Project Veritas
00:13:27.420 has some lawyers saying,
00:13:29.780 OK, your guy is making this claim.
00:13:32.820 The video he's using for his evidence
00:13:34.640 doesn't support that claim.
00:13:36.600 You're just making up a thing
00:13:39.600 and accusing us of it
00:13:41.040 when the video you showed
00:13:42.880 doesn't support the claim.
00:13:45.900 If you were the board,
00:13:47.240 would you remove James O'Keefe over that?
00:13:51.640 I would.
00:13:53.160 I would.
00:13:54.180 If I were the board
00:13:54.960 of Project Veritas,
00:13:56.020 I would have removed him immediately.
00:13:58.280 You know why?
00:13:59.520 Because I wouldn't want
00:14:00.540 to be associated
00:14:01.280 with a huge legal liability
00:14:04.680 to Pfizer.
00:14:06.600 Now, I'm not...
00:14:09.100 I know what you're going to say
00:14:10.540 because I've been here before.
00:14:12.480 I know you're going to say,
00:14:13.360 Pfizer's paying me.
00:14:15.220 No.
00:14:17.140 Pfizer's not paying me.
00:14:19.740 No.
00:14:21.600 Or are you going to say,
00:14:22.660 I am a secret Democrat
00:14:23.700 and I hate Project Veritas?
00:14:26.220 No.
00:14:27.420 I think they do useful stuff.
00:14:30.020 I'd like to see more of it.
00:14:32.920 But I would have removed him.
00:14:34.940 I would have removed him
00:14:36.160 based on only what I know.
00:14:38.240 Right?
00:14:38.640 Just based on what I know,
00:14:40.540 just watching the video
00:14:41.960 and watching his claims,
00:14:43.200 I think I would have removed him.
00:14:44.500 Now, that also destroys
00:14:48.160 Project Veritas,
00:14:49.300 does it not?
00:14:50.860 I would have destroyed
00:14:51.940 Project Veritas over that.
00:14:54.460 That's how I would have done it.
00:14:57.940 Anybody else?
00:14:59.140 Who else,
00:15:00.060 if they were on the board,
00:15:01.100 would have fired him
00:15:02.220 and destroyed Project Veritas
00:15:03.880 over this?
00:15:05.240 I would have.
00:15:05.980 Now, keep in mind,
00:15:09.600 we're wildly speculating.
00:15:11.860 So, my assumption is
00:15:13.620 that we're not accurate.
00:15:16.060 We're not accurate
00:15:17.140 about what's going on there.
00:15:18.480 There might be all kinds of things
00:15:19.900 we've never heard of.
00:15:21.520 So, I wouldn't take my speculation
00:15:23.260 to be very important.
00:15:26.020 But I can tell you
00:15:27.160 as clearly as I can
00:15:28.680 that I would have removed him
00:15:30.380 if I were on the board.
00:15:31.480 Just over what I've seen.
00:15:34.460 But, that's just me.
00:15:36.280 Your mileage might differ.
00:15:39.500 Now,
00:15:40.940 have I demonstrated
00:15:42.580 to your satisfaction
00:15:43.580 that I don't do this for money?
00:15:47.340 Could this be more obvious
00:15:48.760 at this point?
00:15:50.080 Because you know
00:15:51.060 that I know
00:15:52.660 that my audience
00:15:54.240 wants me to support him.
00:15:55.900 Right?
00:15:56.620 That's what you want.
00:15:57.880 You want me to support him.
00:15:59.260 And I know that I'm going
00:16:00.240 to lose audience
00:16:01.200 because I said that.
00:16:03.600 But I'm going to do it anyway
00:16:04.840 because it's obvious.
00:16:06.880 And it would be stupid, frankly,
00:16:08.500 to have a different opinion.
00:16:10.160 I mean,
00:16:10.440 it's right there in front of you.
00:16:11.740 There's nothing to question.
00:16:15.340 Yeah.
00:16:16.600 Anyway,
00:16:17.120 what I saw in the Pfizer video
00:16:19.020 was a Dilbert situation
00:16:20.960 in which
00:16:22.160 here's how I imagined
00:16:23.580 the meeting went.
00:16:24.400 again,
00:16:25.720 pure speculation.
00:16:27.620 So,
00:16:27.780 this is based on my
00:16:28.860 Dilbert filter
00:16:30.280 on business.
00:16:31.780 And I imagine
00:16:32.400 the Pfizer meeting
00:16:33.340 that the undercover video
00:16:35.700 referenced.
00:16:37.000 So,
00:16:37.800 the thing we know
00:16:38.620 is that somebody
00:16:39.300 brought up
00:16:39.960 gain-of-function research
00:16:41.620 in a meeting.
00:16:43.080 That's all we know.
00:16:44.380 The second thing we know
00:16:45.560 is that the executive
00:16:46.600 who talked about it
00:16:47.600 on the undercover video
00:16:49.380 was not in favor of it.
00:16:52.660 Why would we assume
00:16:53.800 anybody else
00:16:54.380 was in favor of it?
00:16:56.620 Like,
00:16:56.820 why would you make
00:16:57.580 the assumption
00:16:58.060 that anybody
00:16:59.520 was in favor of it?
00:17:01.880 That would be unsupportive.
00:17:03.800 Here's how I imagine
00:17:04.940 the meeting.
00:17:05.980 All right?
00:17:06.820 Imagine a typical boss
00:17:08.380 and then imagine
00:17:09.820 typical engineers
00:17:11.260 and scientists.
00:17:12.860 It's just typical
00:17:13.920 business people
00:17:14.780 in the meeting.
00:17:15.700 What does the boss say?
00:17:17.440 This would be
00:17:17.860 a typical boss thing,
00:17:19.100 right?
00:17:19.900 All right,
00:17:20.660 we have to be ready
00:17:21.700 for the next variant.
00:17:24.300 Would a boss say that?
00:17:26.080 Do you think a boss
00:17:26.900 would ever say,
00:17:28.060 hey,
00:17:28.240 we've got to be
00:17:28.840 really ready
00:17:29.400 for the next variant
00:17:30.360 to make the next
00:17:31.900 so-called vaccination?
00:17:33.720 Yes.
00:17:34.440 Yes.
00:17:34.660 The most obvious
00:17:35.680 thing a boss
00:17:36.280 would say
00:17:36.700 is we have to be
00:17:38.080 ready for the next one.
00:17:39.860 So he tells his staff,
00:17:41.920 all right,
00:17:42.300 these are your orders.
00:17:43.960 You've got to be ready
00:17:44.860 for the next one.
00:17:46.340 Now,
00:17:46.880 what do the scientists say?
00:17:49.960 It's a typical meeting
00:17:51.300 in a typical Dilbert company.
00:17:53.460 The boss says
00:17:54.220 you have to be ready
00:17:54.960 for the next variant.
00:17:56.420 What does the scientist say?
00:17:59.480 There's only one thing
00:18:00.720 that a scientist says
00:18:01.720 in that situation.
00:18:02.600 Sure,
00:18:05.080 if you want to do
00:18:05.840 gain-of-function research,
00:18:07.620 we could be ready.
00:18:11.160 Right?
00:18:13.020 And would that scientist
00:18:14.540 be recommending
00:18:15.780 gain-of-function research
00:18:17.140 in that context?
00:18:19.900 Maybe.
00:18:21.380 Maybe.
00:18:23.100 But maybe it was just
00:18:24.520 the response
00:18:25.120 to a stupid boss. 0.55
00:18:26.720 There's only one way
00:18:28.280 we could get ready
00:18:29.040 for the unknown,
00:18:30.500 which is we would have
00:18:31.420 to simulate the unknown,
00:18:33.960 prepare for it
00:18:34.720 based on the simulation,
00:18:36.120 and then maybe
00:18:36.720 we have a chance.
00:18:38.220 But if we don't do
00:18:39.160 gain-of-function research,
00:18:40.840 stop asking us
00:18:41.900 to be ready
00:18:42.520 for something
00:18:43.180 that's unknown.
00:18:45.720 That would be
00:18:46.360 the most typical
00:18:47.040 business conversation
00:18:48.080 in the world.
00:18:48.620 Now,
00:18:50.860 here's another way
00:18:51.600 it could have gone.
00:18:53.140 And again,
00:18:53.820 wild speculation.
00:18:55.760 This is just something
00:18:56.780 I would have said.
00:18:58.260 If you put me
00:18:59.140 in that meeting,
00:18:59.820 here's what I would have said.
00:19:02.260 I would have said,
00:19:03.740 all right,
00:19:04.200 there's no way
00:19:04.800 to be ready
00:19:05.700 for the future
00:19:06.220 without gain-of-function research.
00:19:08.360 And we know
00:19:08.820 that gain-of-function research
00:19:10.180 is the most dangerous
00:19:11.760 thing you could ever do.
00:19:13.740 Right?
00:19:14.240 So far,
00:19:14.820 everybody would agree
00:19:15.460 with that,
00:19:16.300 sounds like.
00:19:17.780 And then I would say,
00:19:19.100 but,
00:19:20.580 is there no way
00:19:21.780 to do gain-of-function research?
00:19:26.400 Is there really no way,
00:19:28.140 or was it obvious
00:19:29.300 that the Wuhan lab
00:19:30.800 did it the wrong way?
00:19:32.240 For example,
00:19:33.700 the Wuhan lab,
00:19:34.940 correct me if I'm wrong,
00:19:36.480 at the end of the shift,
00:19:38.100 people went home.
00:19:39.720 Right?
00:19:40.840 They went from
00:19:41.680 their dangerous,
00:19:43.040 you know,
00:19:43.860 biological lab
00:19:45.460 to their house
00:19:47.420 every single night.
00:19:49.960 All of the employees
00:19:51.060 in this dangerous place,
00:19:53.220 yeah,
00:19:53.440 maybe they showered,
00:19:54.680 but,
00:19:55.140 you know,
00:19:55.840 the cleaning crew,
00:19:57.760 everybody just goes home.
00:20:00.280 Now,
00:20:00.840 I would say,
00:20:01.520 this is what I would have said
00:20:02.440 in the meeting,
00:20:03.260 all right,
00:20:03.740 so obviously,
00:20:04.840 we would never do that.
00:20:06.540 But suppose,
00:20:07.960 just suppose,
00:20:08.840 speculate,
00:20:09.260 we created a lockdown,
00:20:11.780 top-secret place
00:20:12.820 where only things
00:20:14.340 could come in
00:20:15.120 and nothing could leave.
00:20:17.580 Nothing could leave.
00:20:18.900 It's just a secure location
00:20:20.700 away from everything,
00:20:22.000 so you can,
00:20:22.480 you know,
00:20:22.860 airdrop supplies and stuff,
00:20:25.100 and even the garbage
00:20:26.220 wouldn't leave.
00:20:27.780 Even the garbage
00:20:28.600 would stay somewhere locally,
00:20:30.080 no matter how much there was.
00:20:31.740 So nothing would leave,
00:20:33.100 including the people.
00:20:35.080 But,
00:20:36.220 when they were done,
00:20:37.880 and a person wanted to leave,
00:20:40.020 they would be taken
00:20:40.740 into a neighboring place
00:20:42.580 where they're not near
00:20:44.320 the lab stuff,
00:20:45.120 but they're nearby,
00:20:46.340 also secluded.
00:20:48.000 They would stay there
00:20:48.840 for one month,
00:20:50.560 testing themselves.
00:20:51.940 Wouldn't even be a doctor there.
00:20:53.780 Testing themselves
00:20:54.740 for the whole month,
00:20:56.700 and after one month
00:20:57.940 of being alone,
00:20:58.720 then they're released back.
00:20:59.980 So then I say to my boss,
00:21:02.220 all right,
00:21:02.620 if we worked with the government,
00:21:04.860 and we got all the approvals,
00:21:06.600 and we did it in a way
00:21:07.760 that literally nobody could leave,
00:21:10.900 you know,
00:21:11.460 without being completely safe,
00:21:13.500 would we be okay with that
00:21:15.360 because this is such
00:21:16.600 a dangerous situation
00:21:18.220 that we have to get ahead
00:21:19.280 of this next variant?
00:21:21.200 Would that be irresponsible?
00:21:25.040 Not as a brainstorming idea,
00:21:26.840 it wouldn't.
00:21:28.400 You float an idea like that
00:21:30.160 to see what people think
00:21:31.300 is wrong with it.
00:21:32.560 That's how it works.
00:21:34.260 You don't float an idea
00:21:35.440 and say we're done.
00:21:36.960 You put it out there,
00:21:37.900 and then people say,
00:21:38.760 no, that's still too scary.
00:21:40.740 I'd rather take the chance.
00:21:42.620 Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
00:21:43.760 There is no indication
00:21:45.240 in the Pfizer undercover video
00:21:48.460 that they were serious
00:21:50.160 about doing it.
00:21:52.100 There's only indication
00:21:53.300 somebody mentioned it,
00:21:54.700 and I would have mentioned it.
00:21:56.520 If you put me in that meeting,
00:21:57.960 I would have mentioned it
00:21:58.880 because it's the obvious thing
00:22:00.900 to bring up.
00:22:02.020 You might want to rule it out.
00:22:04.100 Probably would have.
00:22:05.080 I probably would have ruled it down,
00:22:06.720 but I would have mentioned it
00:22:07.880 because you have to look
00:22:09.260 at all the options.
00:22:12.060 All right, there we go.
00:22:12.900 Sunshine Felder.
00:22:14.400 Stop helping them.
00:22:15.420 Oh, my goodness.
00:22:19.460 It is so hard not to use profanity.
00:22:22.500 I want to go off on you
00:22:24.000 so hard right now.
00:22:25.820 Oh.
00:22:28.400 Because I think you're the symptom
00:22:31.160 of everything that's wrong
00:22:32.400 with the world.
00:22:35.440 You're completely offended
00:22:37.100 that I would give cover
00:22:39.500 to somebody who you don't like.
00:22:41.540 I'm going to give cover
00:22:44.040 to everybody you don't like,
00:22:46.000 not just Pfizer.
00:22:47.920 If you've watched me long enough,
00:22:49.640 you know I always take the
00:22:50.980 defend the most guilty person
00:22:54.200 or guilty-looking person.
00:22:56.800 You know I always argue
00:22:58.040 the other side.
00:22:59.680 If you can't deal with that,
00:23:01.460 you are not intellectually capable
00:23:03.400 of understanding this live stream.
00:23:07.080 If you don't understand
00:23:08.200 that both sides of issues
00:23:09.620 are worth looking at,
00:23:10.680 you're just,
00:23:12.860 you need to go back
00:23:13.700 to where the NPCs hang out.
00:23:15.720 Right?
00:23:16.000 The actual people with brains
00:23:17.660 and minds and stuff,
00:23:19.360 they can talk about
00:23:20.040 both sides of issues.
00:23:21.640 The rest of you,
00:23:22.600 maybe you need to be
00:23:23.300 somewhere else.
00:23:23.980 Honestly, this isn't
00:23:24.880 the place for you.
00:23:27.260 All right.
00:23:31.160 Let's talk about
00:23:32.120 the New York Times
00:23:33.620 is going after
00:23:34.360 Kamala Harris pretty hard. 1.00
00:23:36.460 So apparently,
00:23:37.000 the New York Times
00:23:37.420 did some research
00:23:39.140 and they talked to
00:23:39.760 dozens of Democrats
00:23:40.940 in the White House
00:23:41.740 and on Capitol Hill.
00:23:43.780 And pretty much,
00:23:44.740 they all seem to have
00:23:45.520 the same opinion,
00:23:46.360 according to the New York Times,
00:23:48.060 that Kamala Harris
00:23:49.740 has not risen to the challenge.
00:23:52.160 Has not risen to the challenge.
00:23:57.160 And they didn't even
00:23:58.380 quote any Republicans
00:24:00.120 in their story.
00:24:01.580 So it was a story,
00:24:02.880 a completely negative story
00:24:04.560 about Kamala Harris,
00:24:05.700 and they didn't even need
00:24:07.580 to talk to a Republican.
00:24:09.900 They got dozens of people
00:24:11.620 to say negative things
00:24:12.900 all on her team.
00:24:16.000 Now,
00:24:16.740 is there any chance
00:24:18.500 she's going to be
00:24:19.100 the vice president?
00:24:21.140 What do you think?
00:24:23.040 Any chance?
00:24:25.500 Here's the problem, though.
00:24:27.480 When you see that
00:24:28.520 she's completely incompetent, 1.00
00:24:30.640 your automatic common sense
00:24:32.600 goes to, then,
00:24:33.680 obviously,
00:24:34.300 they'll replace her. 1.00
00:24:35.700 Here's the argument
00:24:36.540 for why they won't.
00:24:39.780 I'm going to go with
00:24:40.860 won't replace her.
00:24:42.160 Here's why.
00:24:43.720 You would never be able
00:24:44.940 to find somebody
00:24:45.900 less capable than Joe Biden
00:24:48.600 if you look,
00:24:49.620 no matter how hard you look.
00:24:51.500 She's the only person
00:24:52.660 less capable than Joe Biden.
00:24:55.180 And that's the number one requirement.
00:24:58.260 Number one requirement
00:24:59.420 is you can't be more impressive
00:25:00.880 than the top of the ticket.
00:25:02.200 And Joe Biden brings down
00:25:04.700 that level so long.
00:25:05.760 And this is not a joke.
00:25:07.740 This is not a joke.
00:25:09.260 This is the actual way it works.
00:25:11.040 The president has to be more impressive
00:25:12.680 than the vice president,
00:25:14.440 period.
00:25:15.400 No exceptions.
00:25:17.040 You're not going to see anybody
00:25:18.260 violate that rule.
00:25:19.240 Who in the world
00:25:21.220 besides Kamala Harris
00:25:23.560 would everybody agree?
00:25:25.600 Everybody.
00:25:26.200 Both Democrats and Republicans.
00:25:27.700 Everybody agrees
00:25:28.440 she's even less capable 1.00
00:25:29.660 than he is.
00:25:31.080 Can you even imagine
00:25:32.020 anybody else
00:25:32.920 in national politics
00:25:33.980 who would fit that bill?
00:25:37.000 Nobody.
00:25:37.900 Fetterman.
00:25:40.280 Fetterman's the funny answer,
00:25:41.560 but you're right.
00:25:44.360 You're right.
00:25:44.900 He'd be the one person
00:25:45.840 who would fit that target.
00:25:47.780 But he's sort of white and male
00:25:50.300 and that's not going to work.
00:25:51.920 So find somebody
00:25:53.060 who's a person of color,
00:25:55.100 female,
00:25:56.500 and less capable
00:25:58.060 than Joe Biden.
00:26:00.680 Pretty hard.
00:26:02.100 Pretty hard to do.
00:26:03.060 So I'm going to predict
00:26:03.960 that the principle
00:26:06.140 of vice president
00:26:08.940 has to be worse
00:26:09.720 than the president.
00:26:10.340 If Biden continues to run,
00:26:13.420 and I'm going to say he will,
00:26:15.540 let's see your opinions.
00:26:17.400 I say Biden will run.
00:26:19.440 Go.
00:26:20.220 What do you say?
00:26:24.100 Because he's president
00:26:25.300 and he wants to.
00:26:26.300 That's probably all that matters.
00:26:28.820 Yeah.
00:26:29.360 Mostly yeses.
00:26:30.700 We could be surprised.
00:26:32.160 Would you be surprised
00:26:33.080 if he didn't?
00:26:34.340 I wouldn't be surprised,
00:26:36.280 but my prediction
00:26:37.000 is he'll run.
00:26:38.820 And the reason
00:26:39.740 I think he'll run
00:26:40.440 is that he beat
00:26:41.860 Trump once.
00:26:44.060 So I think
00:26:45.040 they're going to beat,
00:26:45.940 and they also say
00:26:46.940 that the Democrats
00:26:48.000 believe Biden's
00:26:49.200 done an unusually good job
00:26:51.380 on the economy
00:26:52.040 because they can
00:26:53.020 lie with numbers.
00:26:54.700 They just show you
00:26:55.340 misleading numbers
00:26:56.240 and the Democrats
00:26:56.960 think everything's
00:26:57.640 going great.
00:26:59.660 So,
00:27:01.380 anyway,
00:27:02.080 we'll keep watching that,
00:27:03.180 but I don't think
00:27:03.560 she's going anywhere.
00:27:04.160 All right,
00:27:05.560 here's a
00:27:06.200 question I asked.
00:27:12.260 If your country
00:27:13.800 was being attacked,
00:27:16.460 let's say
00:27:17.260 you're a Ukrainian.
00:27:19.120 You're a Ukrainian citizen,
00:27:21.540 and you see
00:27:22.320 a Russian soldier
00:27:23.560 that you know
00:27:24.200 is a Russian soldier,
00:27:25.160 and he's attacking
00:27:26.260 your country.
00:27:27.500 Can you kill
00:27:28.360 that soldier?
00:27:28.860 Is that legal?
00:27:33.180 Because I don't know.
00:27:34.800 So a civilian 0.92
00:27:35.460 can kill
00:27:36.340 an invading soldier
00:27:39.320 who they just
00:27:40.320 happened to see
00:27:40.840 walking across
00:27:41.580 their field,
00:27:42.140 right?
00:27:42.920 If they captured him,
00:27:44.240 suppose they captured him,
00:27:45.840 could they kill him?
00:27:48.160 What if it were
00:27:49.380 easy to capture him,
00:27:51.060 but they decided
00:27:51.820 to kill him?
00:27:53.060 Would that be illegal?
00:27:54.100 Because that would
00:27:56.920 be a war crime, 0.79
00:27:57.880 but it's a war crime,
00:27:59.200 but they're not
00:27:59.720 soldiers.
00:28:02.980 So if a non-soldier
00:28:04.460 kills you, 0.94
00:28:06.560 is that illegal?
00:28:08.980 Right.
00:28:09.620 Now,
00:28:09.840 that's Ukraine,
00:28:10.760 so I don't know
00:28:11.300 what the rules are there.
00:28:12.440 Suppose it's America. 0.61
00:28:15.100 Let's move from Ukraine, 1.00
00:28:16.300 we're in America.
00:28:17.080 Let's say America
00:28:17.900 is invaded
00:28:18.780 by a foreign
00:28:19.660 force,
00:28:21.100 and you see
00:28:22.280 one of their
00:28:22.880 members,
00:28:24.100 can you kill
00:28:25.060 that person?
00:28:28.000 What do you think?
00:28:30.200 If you're actually
00:28:31.320 being invaded
00:28:31.960 by a force,
00:28:34.520 you can't kill them?
00:28:37.200 Look how unsure
00:28:38.200 you are.
00:28:39.700 Isn't it weird
00:28:40.260 that you're unsure?
00:28:41.920 Because I'm unsure
00:28:42.940 as well,
00:28:43.380 I don't know
00:28:43.740 the answer to that.
00:28:45.200 Let's say they're
00:28:46.420 not in uniform,
00:28:47.500 but it's an invading
00:28:48.560 force that doesn't
00:28:49.540 wear uniforms.
00:28:51.020 Let's say it's a force
00:28:52.140 that doesn't wear 1.00
00:28:52.720 uniforms.
00:28:54.100 What are you
00:28:54.880 going to do?
00:28:55.320 You can't kill
00:28:55.900 anybody because
00:28:56.440 nobody's in a
00:28:56.980 uniform.
00:28:59.620 Now,
00:29:00.040 have we not
00:29:01.060 declared that
00:29:02.200 the cartels
00:29:03.060 are a terrorist
00:29:04.860 organization?
00:29:07.660 Now,
00:29:08.320 I don't think
00:29:08.920 it's official,
00:29:09.620 right?
00:29:09.960 Congress hasn't
00:29:10.820 official,
00:29:11.620 but it's been
00:29:12.400 proposed
00:29:12.780 that the
00:29:14.440 cartels are
00:29:15.500 a terrorist
00:29:16.120 organization.
00:29:17.160 Now,
00:29:17.460 let me change
00:29:18.320 it from
00:29:18.860 invading force
00:29:20.080 to a terrorist.
00:29:23.960 Let's say
00:29:24.560 you spot a
00:29:25.380 terrorist that
00:29:25.960 you know is
00:29:26.340 a terrorist.
00:29:26.800 Somehow you
00:29:27.240 know.
00:29:27.980 You know
00:29:28.440 they're a
00:29:28.820 terrorist.
00:29:29.580 Can you
00:29:29.880 kill them?
00:29:30.980 Or do you
00:29:31.300 have to call
00:29:31.700 the police?
00:29:35.220 Let's say
00:29:35.800 they're not
00:29:36.220 in the act
00:29:37.280 of doing a
00:29:38.260 terrorist thing.
00:29:39.560 Oh,
00:29:39.780 actually,
00:29:40.180 let's say
00:29:40.440 they are.
00:29:41.760 Let's say
00:29:42.320 you see them
00:29:42.860 actively
00:29:43.420 preparing for,
00:29:44.680 but they're
00:29:46.640 not quite
00:29:47.460 at the moment
00:29:48.060 of the bomb
00:29:49.300 goes off.
00:29:50.360 But you see
00:29:50.760 them actively
00:29:51.440 preparing and
00:29:53.140 you know that
00:29:53.640 if you alerted
00:29:54.380 authorities,
00:29:55.500 there might not
00:29:56.360 be time for
00:29:56.940 the authorities
00:29:57.440 to respond.
00:29:59.040 But they're
00:29:59.360 not quite
00:30:00.180 pushing the
00:30:00.780 button yet,
00:30:01.780 but they're
00:30:02.400 preparing the
00:30:03.080 bomb and
00:30:03.780 they're putting
00:30:04.500 it in their
00:30:04.960 van and
00:30:05.560 they're heading
00:30:06.100 toward where
00:30:06.540 they're going
00:30:06.820 to go.
00:30:07.340 But let's say
00:30:07.780 you catch them
00:30:08.420 somehow.
00:30:08.800 You're just a
00:30:09.280 civilian.
00:30:10.120 Can you kill
00:30:10.700 them?
00:30:12.200 Can you kill
00:30:12.800 them?
00:30:12.980 A terrorist,
00:30:15.580 a known
00:30:16.060 terrorist who
00:30:17.100 is going to
00:30:17.720 blow up a 0.94
00:30:18.480 building and
00:30:18.900 kill people. 0.90
00:30:19.400 Can you kill
00:30:19.820 them?
00:30:20.220 Because they're
00:30:20.580 not doing it
00:30:21.060 yet.
00:30:22.060 They're not
00:30:22.600 doing it yet.
00:30:24.120 I don't think
00:30:24.900 you can.
00:30:25.940 I think the
00:30:26.620 answer is no.
00:30:28.320 I think the
00:30:28.960 answer is no.
00:30:29.520 That would be
00:30:29.860 murder, I
00:30:30.340 think.
00:30:32.700 So here's
00:30:33.540 what we need.
00:30:34.200 We need a
00:30:34.660 little clarity.
00:30:36.580 It's fairly
00:30:37.440 clear that our
00:30:38.200 government is not
00:30:39.100 protecting us from
00:30:40.260 the cartel.
00:30:41.280 Would you all
00:30:41.820 agree with that?
00:30:42.980 Your government
00:30:43.780 is not protecting
00:30:44.780 you from the
00:30:45.320 cartel.
00:30:47.500 At what point
00:30:48.500 does your
00:30:48.960 Second Amendment
00:30:49.660 kick in and
00:30:50.980 you can just
00:30:51.520 start killing
00:30:52.260 everybody who
00:30:53.560 sells fentanyl,
00:30:54.840 whether they're
00:30:55.440 American or 0.51
00:30:56.020 not?
00:30:57.280 Because even an 0.94
00:30:58.200 American who
00:30:58.760 sells fentanyl
00:30:59.480 that came across
00:31:00.140 the border is
00:31:00.860 working with the
00:31:01.540 cartels.
00:31:02.540 They're working
00:31:03.340 either directly or
00:31:04.100 indirectly with the
00:31:04.780 cartels.
00:31:05.280 That would put
00:31:05.740 them on the
00:31:06.260 other side of
00:31:06.880 the war.
00:31:07.980 Now, if we
00:31:10.060 agree that it's
00:31:10.880 terrorism, and I
00:31:12.760 were to just, let's
00:31:15.140 say there was a
00:31:15.760 fentanyl house on
00:31:18.380 my block, and I
00:31:20.600 got all the dads
00:31:21.540 with their ARs, and
00:31:24.280 we surrounded it one
00:31:25.240 day, and we just
00:31:26.000 lit it up.
00:31:27.500 Just killed
00:31:28.200 everybody inside.
00:31:29.840 And the police
00:31:30.440 come, and they
00:31:30.980 arrest us, of
00:31:31.980 course.
00:31:32.580 And then they
00:31:33.120 look inside, and
00:31:33.820 they see it's all
00:31:34.560 cartel members.
00:31:35.680 Is that a
00:31:37.760 crime?
00:31:40.540 Because the
00:31:41.460 cartel members who
00:31:43.080 are getting ready to
00:31:43.880 sell fentanyl are
00:31:45.200 mass murderers.
00:31:47.220 They are killing
00:31:48.260 Americans.
00:31:49.360 They're just getting
00:31:49.960 ready to do it, and
00:31:51.080 there's no doubt that
00:31:51.840 they're going to do
00:31:52.520 it.
00:31:53.080 There's no question
00:31:53.800 of what happens
00:31:54.320 next.
00:31:55.300 If there are people
00:31:55.940 who sell fentanyl, and
00:31:57.000 they've got a big
00:31:57.480 batch in there, they're
00:31:59.200 going to sell it.
00:32:00.700 People are going to
00:32:01.440 die.
00:32:02.200 There's no question
00:32:03.100 about what happens.
00:32:04.320 That's easy to know.
00:32:05.680 You can't murder
00:32:06.940 them, or kill 0.57
00:32:08.480 them.
00:32:08.740 It wouldn't be
00:32:09.100 murder in my
00:32:10.180 town.
00:32:11.500 Well, here's the
00:32:12.580 problem.
00:32:14.240 We're going to be
00:32:15.700 there.
00:32:16.540 We'd better figure
00:32:17.340 this out.
00:32:18.500 Because the
00:32:19.500 government seems to
00:32:20.300 have no will to
00:32:21.420 handle this, and
00:32:22.720 there will be a
00:32:23.380 point where Americans
00:32:24.220 decide to do it
00:32:25.140 themselves.
00:32:26.660 We're not right
00:32:27.860 there, but we're
00:32:29.240 heading toward there
00:32:30.320 at 65 miles an
00:32:31.780 hour.
00:32:32.960 We're approaching
00:32:33.940 a point where
00:32:34.560 somebody with an
00:32:35.400 AR is going to
00:32:36.960 wipe out a bunch
00:32:37.740 of cartel
00:32:38.600 suspected people.
00:32:40.620 And then, here's
00:32:41.240 the part that's
00:32:41.780 fun.
00:32:43.660 Put me on the
00:32:44.520 jury.
00:32:47.020 Put me on the
00:32:47.860 jury.
00:32:49.620 No way.
00:32:50.340 No way.
00:32:51.260 I'm not even
00:32:51.960 going to listen to
00:32:52.500 the evidence.
00:32:53.800 I won't even
00:32:54.600 listen to the
00:32:55.140 evidence.
00:32:56.140 And I'll tell you
00:32:56.760 that up front.
00:32:57.420 Nope, not going to
00:32:58.140 listen to the
00:32:58.580 evidence.
00:32:58.940 If they took
00:33:00.560 out cartel
00:33:01.260 members, self
00:33:02.680 defense, end
00:33:04.420 of story.
00:33:05.420 I don't even
00:33:06.140 care what they
00:33:06.600 were doing.
00:33:07.580 I don't even
00:33:08.080 care if there
00:33:08.520 were family
00:33:08.980 members in the
00:33:09.580 house.
00:33:10.440 Don't care.
00:33:11.320 Don't care if
00:33:11.980 there was
00:33:12.200 collateral damage.
00:33:13.720 Nope.
00:33:14.360 Don't care.
00:33:15.480 They would get
00:33:16.020 off.
00:33:16.680 And I would
00:33:17.240 like every
00:33:18.660 American to
00:33:19.480 make the same
00:33:20.000 commitment.
00:33:21.280 That if an
00:33:22.100 American kills a 1.00
00:33:23.020 member of the
00:33:23.460 cartel, or
00:33:24.500 anybody dealing
00:33:25.220 fentanyl, that
00:33:26.840 you would promise
00:33:27.680 that if you're
00:33:28.220 on a jury, you
00:33:28.880 would not
00:33:29.200 convict them
00:33:29.800 under any
00:33:31.220 circumstance, no
00:33:32.600 matter what law
00:33:33.200 they broke.
00:33:34.640 Because your
00:33:35.360 government has
00:33:35.900 abandoned you on
00:33:36.940 fentanyl.
00:33:38.320 Let's be clear.
00:33:39.580 The government
00:33:40.160 has abandoned
00:33:41.060 you.
00:33:41.880 I do not
00:33:42.660 recommend
00:33:43.200 vigilantism.
00:33:44.520 I oppose it.
00:33:46.000 I do not
00:33:46.520 recommend it.
00:33:47.780 But it's
00:33:48.280 probably going
00:33:48.740 to happen.
00:33:50.320 And here's
00:33:50.840 what I do
00:33:51.180 recommend.
00:33:51.880 If it happens,
00:33:52.900 don't put them
00:33:53.600 in jail.
00:33:55.120 If they kill
00:33:56.040 cartel members,
00:33:56.900 even maybe
00:33:59.020 if they have
00:33:59.460 some collateral
00:34:00.020 damage, I
00:34:02.560 would go that
00:34:03.080 far.
00:34:04.040 Because it is
00:34:04.880 a war, and
00:34:05.840 your government's
00:34:06.500 not protecting
00:34:07.120 you.
00:34:07.860 You do have a
00:34:08.800 right to protect
00:34:09.460 yourself.
00:34:10.760 You do have
00:34:11.300 that right.
00:34:12.240 It's just not
00:34:12.940 legal at the
00:34:13.520 moment.
00:34:14.740 But you have
00:34:15.160 the right.
00:34:16.140 Because the
00:34:16.680 right is
00:34:17.420 independent of
00:34:18.000 the law.
00:34:19.100 This is one of
00:34:19.980 those cases where
00:34:20.720 it wouldn't
00:34:21.200 really matter
00:34:21.720 what the law
00:34:22.200 says.
00:34:23.080 Your right to
00:34:24.360 protect yourself
00:34:25.160 is unassailable.
00:34:27.520 It doesn't
00:34:27.920 matter what
00:34:28.300 law anybody
00:34:29.100 has.
00:34:29.800 It doesn't
00:34:30.140 matter what
00:34:30.460 your constitution
00:34:31.100 says.
00:34:32.300 You can
00:34:32.860 protect yourself
00:34:33.920 and your
00:34:34.300 family, period.
00:34:36.760 We all agree,
00:34:37.740 right?
00:34:38.080 That's not a
00:34:39.260 conversation to
00:34:40.000 have.
00:34:40.800 So I'm just
00:34:41.740 going to promise
00:34:42.360 that if you
00:34:43.060 put me on a
00:34:44.060 jury trial for
00:34:45.460 somebody who
00:34:46.160 murdered a
00:34:47.020 member of a
00:34:47.520 cartel, I
00:34:48.780 will not vote
00:34:49.700 under any
00:34:51.040 circumstance, I
00:34:51.760 will not vote
00:34:52.200 guilty.
00:34:52.480 Now, of
00:34:53.980 course, this
00:34:54.540 guarantees I
00:34:55.200 will not be
00:34:55.640 on a jury
00:34:56.580 trial.
00:34:57.520 Am I
00:34:57.800 right?
00:34:59.340 No attorney
00:35:00.800 would allow me
00:35:01.420 on the trial.
00:35:02.240 But you
00:35:02.580 should do the
00:35:03.100 same.
00:35:04.800 All it takes
00:35:05.640 is you just
00:35:06.260 tweet that you
00:35:06.920 would not
00:35:07.460 convict anybody
00:35:08.600 for killing a
00:35:09.320 cartel member
00:35:09.940 or a
00:35:10.420 fentanyl
00:35:10.820 dealer.
00:35:12.020 Don't
00:35:12.380 recommend it.
00:35:13.800 This is very
00:35:14.440 important.
00:35:15.260 Do not
00:35:15.700 recommend it.
00:35:17.520 And by the
00:35:17.940 way, I'm
00:35:19.280 sure you know
00:35:19.780 by now that
00:35:20.360 this live stream
00:35:21.980 has been
00:35:22.320 demonetized.
00:35:24.120 You can't
00:35:24.920 even talk
00:35:25.380 about this
00:35:26.000 topic without
00:35:26.640 getting demonetized.
00:35:28.260 So I'm doing
00:35:28.740 this for free,
00:35:30.140 working for free
00:35:30.940 today, as I
00:35:32.640 did the other
00:35:33.100 day when I
00:35:33.540 mentioned
00:35:33.840 vigilanteism.
00:35:35.100 That's immediate
00:35:35.760 demonetization.
00:35:36.980 It's very
00:35:37.320 expensive.
00:35:38.440 It's very
00:35:38.900 expensive to
00:35:39.600 say something
00:35:40.220 that's useful
00:35:41.560 and true.
00:35:43.440 Very expensive.
00:35:45.520 But shouldn't
00:35:48.140 have killed
00:35:48.420 my son-in-law
00:35:49.160 or my
00:35:50.560 stepson.
00:35:53.920 So if
00:35:54.680 they hadn't
00:35:55.000 killed my
00:35:55.420 stepson, I'd
00:35:56.060 probably shut 0.78
00:35:56.500 up about this.
00:35:57.560 But hey, I
00:35:59.500 didn't start it.
00:36:01.380 I didn't start
00:36:02.280 the fight.
00:36:04.300 But if any
00:36:07.420 of you vote
00:36:08.460 to convict
00:36:09.220 somebody who
00:36:09.840 kills a
00:36:10.400 fentanyl
00:36:10.840 dealer, you
00:36:13.360 got a lot of
00:36:13.840 explaining to
00:36:14.500 do.
00:36:15.300 You have a
00:36:15.900 lot of
00:36:16.320 explaining to
00:36:16.960 do.
00:36:17.160 Well, I
00:36:21.940 don't have to
00:36:22.320 say anything
00:36:22.660 about that.
00:36:23.740 All right.
00:36:26.540 I don't see
00:36:27.280 anybody disagree
00:36:27.840 with me.
00:36:31.520 I didn't see
00:36:32.460 anybody disagree
00:36:33.260 with me.
00:36:34.080 Is there
00:36:34.360 anybody who
00:36:34.800 would disagree
00:36:35.380 with the
00:36:38.800 jury idea of
00:36:40.760 not convicting
00:36:41.540 them?
00:36:42.360 Anybody
00:36:42.700 against that?
00:36:44.560 I think you're
00:36:45.360 all on the
00:36:45.920 same page.
00:36:46.460 See, this is
00:36:47.500 what's so
00:36:47.900 remarkable about
00:36:49.020 this situation.
00:36:50.600 It's remarkable
00:36:51.520 in that the
00:36:52.160 public is all
00:36:53.500 on the same
00:36:54.000 page, and the
00:36:55.620 government won't
00:36:56.300 act.
00:36:58.180 The only
00:36:58.940 possible reason
00:37:00.200 for that is
00:37:00.700 that they're
00:37:01.040 already bought
00:37:01.540 off.
00:37:03.340 Oh, excuse
00:37:05.100 me for a
00:37:05.580 second.
00:37:05.820 I'm going to
00:37:06.040 take off my
00:37:06.560 microphones to
00:37:07.300 bring my
00:37:07.640 whiteboard over
00:37:08.300 here.
00:37:09.340 Hold on.
00:37:09.820 Hold on.
00:37:09.880 Hold on.
00:37:10.820 Hold on.
00:37:10.880 Hold on.
00:37:11.880 Hold on.
00:37:12.820 Hold on.
00:37:12.880 Hold on.
00:37:13.880 Hold on.
00:37:14.880 Hold on.
00:37:15.880 Hold on.
00:37:16.760 Hold on.
00:37:17.120 Hold on.
00:37:17.620 Hold on.
00:37:19.060 Hold on.
00:37:19.680 Hold on.
00:37:20.020 Hold on.
00:37:20.760 Hold on.
00:37:21.420 Hold on.
00:37:21.940 Hold on.
00:37:25.240 Hold on.
00:37:37.960 Hold on.
00:37:38.340 Hold on.
00:37:38.820 All right, back in action.
00:37:53.440 So, here's the thing I worry about.
00:37:57.520 And worry is the wrong word, because this is a fact.
00:38:02.440 All right, so what I'm going to show you is in speculation.
00:38:05.200 This is the way everything has to go, all right?
00:38:12.400 Let's say you're a cartel, and you want to sell some stuff in the United States.
00:38:17.880 If you're only doing it on a small scale, and there's not much harm yet,
00:38:23.140 the only thing you have to bribe is maybe a police officer in a small town.
00:38:31.180 Maybe that's the only bribery you need, because you're not doing much harm yet.
00:38:35.640 But, as your harm increases, and you're selling more fentanyl,
00:38:39.660 and you're killing tens of thousands of Americans every year,
00:38:43.320 the only way you're going to get away with that is to increase your bribery and your control.
00:38:49.760 So, you're going to have to bribe your way up from local police officers,
00:38:53.180 to maybe, you know, council people, to maybe state senators, to maybe Congress.
00:39:01.080 The bigger fentanyl gets, the more they're going to have to bribe to stay in business.
00:39:07.380 At some point, they have to control Congress or go out of business.
00:39:12.420 Because the cartels have to either grow or die, just like any business.
00:39:17.840 Every business has to either grow or shrink.
00:39:20.740 Nothing ever stays, you know, the same for years and years.
00:39:23.720 Everything grows or shrinks.
00:39:24.860 The cartels have to grow.
00:39:27.820 They have to grow to be competitive with the other cartels.
00:39:31.380 They have to grow to be competitive with the Mexican government,
00:39:34.520 should it ever become less corrupt.
00:39:36.660 They have to increase their power all the time,
00:39:39.260 because they're increasing their harm.
00:39:41.120 So, the will to fight them is going up with the harm,
00:39:47.060 and they have to work against the will to fight them through bribery,
00:39:50.780 because they don't have an army, per se, not a standing army.
00:39:54.420 So, it is inevitable that if we don't deal with them,
00:39:57.820 they will own Congress eventually.
00:40:01.520 Why is Congress not acting?
00:40:05.560 Yeah, you can say they have standing armies.
00:40:07.600 I'll give you that.
00:40:08.280 Why is Congress not acting in the most obvious way,
00:40:11.940 which is to go directly after the cartels?
00:40:14.500 There's only one reason I can think of,
00:40:17.020 that we're already here.
00:40:19.400 That's the only reason I can think of.
00:40:21.900 Because the debate doesn't really make sense,
00:40:28.520 or it's not happening.
00:40:29.720 It's not like there's even a debate on it.
00:40:32.040 There's something going on,
00:40:34.020 and I can't think of anything else it would be.
00:40:36.320 So, your best case scenario is that we're not there yet.
00:40:42.820 But if we don't hurry,
00:40:44.840 there's only one way this can go.
00:40:47.400 They will sell more fentanyl, more harm.
00:40:50.360 They will have to bribe higher and higher officials
00:40:53.040 to stay in business.
00:40:54.840 Otherwise, we'll send the military.
00:40:57.300 Eventually, they have to own Congress.
00:40:59.020 They would have to do it as a business strategy.
00:41:02.120 They don't have a choice.
00:41:04.120 They have to own Congress or go out of business.
00:41:07.840 It's also them.
00:41:09.800 It just doesn't seem like it,
00:41:11.280 because you're probably still down here somewhere.
00:41:13.600 But they have to get to that point.
00:41:15.960 They can't survive
00:41:17.160 unless they take over the American lawmakers. 0.80
00:41:21.400 Has anybody ever explained that to you before?
00:41:26.680 Is it the first time you're learning
00:41:28.280 that it is a fight to the death?
00:41:31.540 The fight with the cartels is to the death.
00:41:35.620 Or control.
00:41:37.020 Not to death, I suppose.
00:41:38.720 They either will control us,
00:41:40.400 or we will destroy them. 0.52
00:41:42.540 They have no other options,
00:41:43.920 in the long run.
00:41:44.820 In the short run,
00:41:45.700 they do their business as usual
00:41:47.660 and try to grow.
00:41:48.660 In the long run,
00:41:49.840 it's us or them.
00:41:50.640 Never heard of that before, did you?
00:41:55.600 Yeah.
00:41:56.280 If you doubt it,
00:41:57.260 just look at Mexico.
00:41:59.400 The cartels had to take over
00:42:01.420 the entire Mexican government.
00:42:03.780 They had to.
00:42:05.020 So they did.
00:42:06.860 So they did.
00:42:08.260 They have to take over
00:42:09.640 the American government.
00:42:11.400 They have to.
00:42:14.280 Maybe they already have.
00:42:17.520 Maybe they already have.
00:42:19.360 I don't know.
00:42:20.640 It's possible.
00:42:21.780 I mean,
00:42:22.100 the evidence would suggest they have.
00:42:24.960 There's more evidence that they have
00:42:26.480 than that they haven't.
00:42:28.340 Now,
00:42:28.780 it could be that it's only indirectly,
00:42:31.820 because nobody wants to,
00:42:33.060 you know,
00:42:33.780 nobody wants to be the target.
00:42:36.100 So it could be that.
00:42:37.100 All right.
00:42:39.180 Well,
00:42:39.440 that's where we're at.
00:42:40.420 But I'd rather talk about
00:42:41.780 UFOs going down
00:42:43.060 and come down.
00:42:44.740 That's the fun story.
00:42:46.200 All right.
00:42:46.460 Ladies and gentlemen,
00:42:48.060 this concludes
00:42:49.220 my prepared remarks.
00:42:51.340 I'm going to say
00:42:51.860 goodbye to the
00:42:53.200 YouTubers 0.97
00:42:54.080 and then talk to my
00:42:55.560 beloved
00:42:56.460 community
00:42:57.700 on locals.
00:42:58.560 and I will talk to you
00:43:04.780 tomorrow,
00:43:05.280 YouTube.
00:43:05.940 Best live stream
00:43:06.740 you've ever seen.
00:43:07.700 Bye for now.
00:43:08.380 Thank you.