Rebel News Podcast - CBC propaganda： Child actors tell other kids they’re going to die from global warming

00:00:00.000 Hello, my rebels. Oh, I got a show for you today and you're going to get a lot of out of it from

00:00:05.280 the podcast. But really, I think you guys got to watch the video because I've got I got some vids

00:00:10.160 from this new CBC propaganda channel called CBC News Kids. And you've got to see the vids because

00:00:16.380 you've got to see these nine year old and 11 year old kids saying these things. So, yeah,

00:00:20.700 I think you're going to love the podcast, if I may say so. I think it's a fun one.

00:00:24.300 And there's some crazy stuff. But you can you do me a favor and can you can you go to

00:00:29.580 the rebel.media slash shows and can you assign them to be a premium member? It's eight bucks a

00:00:36.940 month. I know that's not nothing, but it's not it's not a ton. The rebel.media slash shows eight

00:00:42.980 bucks a month. And you not only get the podcast, obviously, which is free, but you get the video

00:00:47.660 every day. I do a show. Sheila has a show. David Menzies has a show. You get it on video

00:00:55.080 and you help us keep keep the company going here. But you get the video. And I think today's video

00:01:02.320 got to see these kids. This is one kid from, I think, Holland or something. And you got to see

00:01:08.200 her eyes. You got to see the eyes. All right. I'll stop beating a dead horse. Here is my podcast

00:01:15.780 about climate kamikaze kids. Take a look. Tonight, CBC hires child actors to tell other kids

00:01:27.720 they're all going to die from global warming. It's April 8th. And this is the Ezra LeVant Show.

00:01:32.880 Why should others go to jail when you're a biggest carbon consumer I know? There's 8,500

00:01:39.620 customers here and you won't give them an answer. The only thing I have to say to the government

00:01:44.660 about why I'm publishing it is because it's my bloody right to do so.

00:01:54.300 The SNC-Lavalland scandal is spinning even further out of control for Justin Trudeau. Now they're just

00:02:01.360 shooting pucks into their own net. Yesterday, Andrew Scheer, the conservative leader, revealed

00:02:06.000 that he received this letter from Justin Trudeau's lawyer threatening to sue Scheer for his comments

00:02:13.040 about Trudeau's corruption. As in a defamation suit. As in to have the truth of the whole matter

00:02:18.620 determined in a court of law. That Trudeau doesn't control like he controls parliamentary committees.

00:02:26.080 Where Trudeau will have to answer real questions under oath and he won't be able to skip them

00:02:31.020 as he often does with question period or give non-answers or give untrue answers.

00:02:38.140 Not just that, but Trudeau would have to provide all of his records on the matter.

00:02:41.840 Any emails, texts, memos, notes, minutes of meetings. And those of his staff that touch on

00:02:47.280 the SNC-Lavalland matter and they could be subpoenaed to testify to his staff. Why would Trudeau do that?

00:02:54.180 Well, he wouldn't do that. So why would he threaten to do that? I just don't get it. I don't get it.

00:03:04.880 Andrew Scheer had a press conference about it and sent his own letter back by lawyer saying he stands

00:03:09.860 by every word he said. And then if Trudeau really does want to sue him, well, he should get on with

00:03:14.320 the lawsuit as soon as possible, given the matter is of great public interest. Now what's Trudeau going to

00:03:20.140 do? If he goes ahead with the lawsuit, it's just nuts. Do you really think Trudeau knows how to

00:03:25.940 answer direct questions under oath, being cross-examined by an experienced lawyer, where

00:03:30.820 he can't give just some trite cliche where the judge will say, order the question, Mr. Trudeau.

00:03:37.040 I mean, the kind of answer that the CBC accepts is a bit different from the kind that a judge will require.

00:03:43.520 Each of these interactions was a conversation among colleagues about how to tackle a challenging

00:03:51.100 issue. Each came at a time when my staff and I believed that the former minister of justice and

00:03:58.520 attorney general was open to considering other aspects of the public interest. However, I now

00:04:05.980 understand that she saw it differently. Yeah, there's no way he's going to sue. So he's got to back down,

00:04:12.360 which is Shear noted in his lawyer's letter, can reasonably be taken to mean that he does indeed

00:04:18.820 accept that what Shear and the rest of the country believe happened is actually true. If you threaten

00:04:24.560 to sue a guy and then don't go ahead, that's what you're saying. So weird to make a threat like that

00:04:29.880 and then back down, just really, really bad decision-making over there in the PMO these days.

00:04:35.260 Here's Trudeau's director of communications, just furious with how this whole thing, how this whole

00:04:40.740 threat was taken by the public. Kate Purchase said, funny how the Conservative Party of Canada

00:04:46.660 has had the libel letter outlining their over-the-top language for a week, but chose to

00:04:51.240 release it today. It takes a while to figure out how to use your own bad behavior as a media strategy,

00:04:57.700 I guess. What? What? What? I don't even get it. So you receive a libel threat from a fancy lawyer.

00:05:04.440 So you call your lawyer. You send him a copy of the letter. He considers it. He looks at it. Then he

00:05:10.980 calls you up. He consults with you. Maybe he meets with you. He drafts a reply. You have a press

00:05:15.900 conference. You do all of that in a week. That's pretty quick. But even if it weren't, what did her

00:05:23.020 tweet even mean? Does it mean, how dare the opposition oppose? How dare they try and embarrass

00:05:28.420 my boss? How dare they object publicly to a legal threat to be sued by the prime minister? I don't

00:05:34.580 even understand it. I don't get it. Other than it must truly, truly be a difficult time in the prime

00:05:40.220 minister's office for the first time ever. And they don't know how to handle it. And it looks so good

00:05:45.400 on them, doesn't it? So that's a legal threat. And it has backfired huge. It has only ensured that

00:05:52.540 the story will continue more and longer. And journalists will be curious when Trudeau doesn't

00:05:57.160 sue. And it's just given this thing a little bit more life. And we still don't know what the next

00:06:02.340 move is from Jody Wilson-Raybould herself. Here's a story in the Toronto Star about a couple of opinion

00:06:07.900 polls in Vancouver, where Wilson-Raybould is from. According to the April 4 to 5 survey, 33% of her

00:06:16.040 riding's voters would cast their ballot for her as an independent, trailed by the Liberals' 24% support,

00:06:23.080 the NDP's 21%, and Tories' 15%. So that's in Vancouver-Granville, Wilson-Raybould's own riding.

00:06:31.300 And look at this. The larger 514-voter sample of the city found that Wilson-Raybould enjoys 68%

00:06:38.720 support among Vancouverites, more than double the 28% who side with Trudeau. Wow.

00:06:46.420 I absolutely believe that, by the way. It rings true. Here's a tweet by John Nunziata. Remember him?

00:06:53.100 He was a liberal who was kicked out of the party a couple decades ago for opposing the GST.

00:06:59.260 He's tweeting the front page. You see there, he's tweeting the front page of the newspaper

00:07:03.360 when he was turfed, Kretchen expels MP, and then the front page when Wilson-Raybould was turfed.

00:07:09.820 And he says, his commentary is,

00:07:12.880 I went on to win as an independent in 1997, forcing Jean-Cretchen to eat crow.

00:07:19.680 Jody Wilson-Raybould and Jane Philpott should run as independents and force pseudo-feminist 0.69

00:07:24.580 Justin Trudeau to eat crow.

00:07:28.900 I bet there's a lot of that support out there. This lawsuit threat by Trudeau is so, so funny.

00:07:34.120 I just can't believe they did it. Funny is the wrong word. Amateur, desperate, ill-considered,

00:07:40.140 embarrassing, Hail Mary pass. I don't know.

00:07:42.520 I'm frankly surprised that Julian Porter, the senior lawyer Trudeau hired to write the letter,

00:07:46.840 didn't try harder to convince Trudeau not to do it.

00:07:49.040 I mean, just because your client wants you to do something and offers to pay you to do something

00:07:54.200 doesn't mean you should do it as a lawyer if you actually care about your client and giving him

00:07:58.560 the best advice. When you have so much of the government run through one guy, though,

00:08:02.820 and I'm talking about Gerald Butz, the master, the power behind the throne, the de facto government,

00:08:08.840 the guy with all the phone numbers, and then he's forced out, you really have decapitated the

00:08:14.620 whole regime. Butz is a smart guy, to be sure. But there's no one human being smart enough to run

00:08:20.680 everything. No one person has enough hours in the day to run everything. I think the concentration of

00:08:27.300 the whole government in Gerald Butz's hands, you know he was intimately involved in everything

00:08:32.600 important. He had a veto over everything. He was up to his eyeballs in the NAFTA deal,

00:08:38.300 and the China schlamazel, and the carbon tax, and all important appointments. I think that

00:08:46.540 Butz is a competent man. I disagree with him on everything, but he's a competent man. He's not

00:08:50.880 a genius per se, but he's smart, and he's hardworking. But no one human being can run a

00:08:56.800 government of a country of 35 million people with hundreds of projects and moving parts. There are

00:09:02.680 200,000 civil servants for a reason. But Butz had to control everything, and he's blown himself up,

00:09:08.300 and the whole government is adrift now. And it's so weird and pitiful, and it's so good that it

00:09:14.380 happened before the election, not after, don't you think? Anyways, that's the big, big problem for

00:09:21.300 Trudeau. So what does Trudeau do? Well, normally when he's in trouble, like after his India fiasco,

00:09:29.200 he goes to his safe space, which is high school kids, who are dazzled that a politician would visit

00:09:35.540 them. And, you know, he doesn't use big words. That's great. Talks about a lot of cliches. It's

00:09:42.540 why he and his family are so closely associated with the Kielberger brothers and their youth

00:09:47.500 indoctrination sessions called We Day. Here's Trudeau's mom at the last We Day in Toronto.

00:09:53.580 I'm so proud to be part of We as well. Now, We, I love it the most because it is neither a political

00:10:01.780 movement nor a religious one. We encompasses all politics, all political parties, all faiths,

00:10:09.740 all beliefs, because we feel that together we can change the world. And we know we can.

00:10:17.800 What? Jeez. Yeah, normally kids love Trudeau. But that didn't happen last week. Remember when the

00:10:25.800 so-called daughters of the vote attended parliament? 338 of them, well, 50 of them stood up and turned

00:10:31.340 their backs on Trudeau when he was speaking. That's never happened to Trudeau before. He doesn't know

00:10:36.880 what to do. So he's gone even grosser. Look at this story in the state broadcaster. Trudeau brings

00:10:46.440 son on Toronto Charm Offensive amid slumping poll numbers. This is them really starting to campaign,

00:10:53.240 says University of Windsor professor. So he's taking his 11-year-old boy and using him as a

00:11:00.620 campaign prop, as political fodder. Trudeau, Justin Trudeau is hated. Seriously, he's hated. If you look 0.97

00:11:06.680 at the latest Angus Reid poll, look at this. People who like Trudeau, they like him enough.

00:11:11.040 They moderately approve. But the people who dislike Trudeau, they don't just casually dislike

00:11:18.140 him. Look at that. 47% of Canadians hate him. Trudeau is using his 11-year-old boy as a sort of

00:11:28.380 political human shield. Now, Trudeau's wife Sophie doesn't really show her face in public that much 1.00

00:11:33.460 anymore. When Melania Trump steps out of the spotlight for a few days, the media goes insane. 0.98

00:11:39.600 They went on this weird speculative tear that she was divorcing Trump. Yeah, no, she was in the

00:11:46.840 hospital, you macabre freaks. Sophie Trudeau isn't seen with Trudeau in months. It's seen without her

00:11:55.940 wedding ring. Well, oh, it's not polite to report on family business like that. So Trudeau has gone to

00:12:02.380 his safe place, kids. And if other people's kids turn their back on him, he can always parade out

00:12:07.860 his own 11-year-old. Well, what have the rest of the Liberals been talking about these past few

00:12:14.280 disastrous months without Gerald Butts to guide them? They haven't been talking about foreign affairs,

00:12:20.060 not the renegotiated NAFTA that has not been ratified. It's not going well. Not the economy.

00:12:25.920 I showed you on Friday how Canada lost thousands of jobs last month while America gained 200,000.

00:12:34.260 Liberals don't like to talk about industry or pipelines, not the military where Trudeau is

00:12:39.560 trying to scapegoat an admiral and the admirals fighting back and winning. Trudeau's team is not

00:12:46.720 talking about China that still holds hostages of ours. Trudeau's team is not really talking about

00:12:53.280 anything real that I can think of. I mean, what's the good news politically in Canada? Can you think

00:12:58.520 of anything? Even the carbon tax, they've sort of dropped mentioning the carbon tax. They know it's

00:13:04.440 a political disaster. So they've all just started talking about global warming, or as they call it

00:13:11.060 now that the globe just hasn't actually warmed in two decades, combating climate change, fighting

00:13:16.580 climate change. So you see bizarre things like this.

00:13:21.820 So really thrilled to be here. A great example of how we can work together to tackle climate change,

00:13:28.240 to save money, to make life more affordable, and really practical solutions. I didn't think I would

00:13:34.000 be so excited to be talking about replacements of chillers, but it's a great, great opportunity, 0.98

00:13:39.420 and thank you very much. So that's Catherine McKenna giving your tax dollars to Loblaws.

00:13:48.500 Here, let me read from her press release.

00:13:51.420 The government is investing up to $12 million subject to a funding agreement to help the company

00:13:56.680 convert the refrigeration systems in approximately 370 stores across Canada over the next three years.

00:14:03.480 Hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on. Investing, they've got a lot of investors.

00:14:08.420 The stock market, you can invest in, why is the government investing in Loblaws? We're buying

00:14:14.960 370 new fridges for Loblaws? You know they're a big company, right? Have you heard of Loblaws?

00:14:22.540 You know they're owned by billionaires, Canada's second richest family, right? The Westons.

00:14:28.620 I checked the stock market capitalization for Loblaws today. It is worth more than $25 billion on the

00:14:35.760 stock market. They buy fridges all the time. It's sort of their business, selling groceries.

00:14:41.620 They can afford to buy their own damn fridges. Why are we buying fridges for a billionaire company? 0.99

00:14:50.720 Why would we buy fridges for anyone, other than maybe for a bona fide charity? I don't know,

00:14:55.880 like maybe for a food bank or something. I can understand the government buying a fridge for a

00:15:00.780 food bank. Speaking of food banks, speaking of which, Loblaws is pretty much the opposite of

00:15:07.500 a food bank. They actually steal bread from the mouths of the poor. I don't know if you remember

00:15:13.520 because the media party doesn't like to talk about it, but Loblaws confessed to engaging in a criminal

00:15:20.140 price fixing scheme to jack up the price of bread for more than a decade. Billions of dollars stolen

00:15:30.460 from the poor. You're rich. You spend an extra buck for a loaf of bread. It's no skin off your nose.

00:15:35.540 That was stealing money from the poor. And Catherine McKenna is giving those bread stealers free money to buy 0.71

00:15:45.580 bloody fridges because global warming, guys. Well, now I think that's just sad. And I think she knows

00:15:52.780 it. I mean, I just can't get this shouty moment out of my mind. This is someone flailing around

00:15:59.020 just as bad as Trudeau is, just as desperate. You know what I'm talking about.

00:16:03.100 So let's talk about climate change for a second. Who believes it's real?

00:16:08.800 Who believes in science?

00:16:10.500 We got a report last year that said we have 12 years to take serious climate action. We are all in

00:16:20.560 this together. We need to act. So because there was a fire caused by arson in British Columbia last

00:16:27.920 summer, I'm going to give $12 million to buy a new fridge for the billionaire Weston family that

00:16:33.900 was confessed to stealing bread from the poor. And if you don't like it, you're a climate criminal.

00:16:43.960 Yeah. Now, I'm used to that. And the media is pumping out propaganda stories, as you might expect.

00:16:49.500 Here's Trudeau tweeting out a panicky story about global warming from the Toronto Star here

00:16:54.720 with a terrible picture of a forest fire. Doesn't that look bad? And he says,

00:16:59.180 this is why we need climate action now, caps, just in case you didn't know when you needed it.

00:17:04.540 And a price on pollution is a key part of that. Our kids and grandkids are counting on us.

00:17:09.720 Yeah. Well, that, that, that fire they showed there, it wasn't caused by global warming.

00:17:15.180 It was caused by accident when construction workers accidentally caused a fire.

00:17:22.580 Construction workers, by the way, they were building wind turbines. I know that. So you won't even

00:17:29.500 believe the coincidence that that's what they were building. It doesn't matter what they were

00:17:32.460 building. Obviously it was accidental. So yeah, it wasn't, wasn't global warming. It was an industrial

00:17:38.160 accident. Now, I don't think any of this weird stuff is clicking. I can't imagine anyone saying,

00:17:44.580 yeah, you gave my money to buy fridges to the country's second richest family. Woo. I'm forgetting

00:17:54.980 about that Jody Wilson-Raybould stuff. I think the reason Kate Purchase, the communications director,

00:18:00.560 is so mad that Andrew Scheer had a press conference is because none of this is working. People aren't

00:18:05.960 going back to their normal submissive cult-like following of Justin Trudeau. And most of all,

00:18:11.760 the media itself is deeply disillusioned because they realized they've been played for chumps 0.74

00:18:17.500 better late than never. But let me show you something new, something new and bizarre.

00:18:25.160 Speaking of kids, look at this today. This is from CBC today. Many kids in Toronto skipped school for

00:18:33.100 yet another school strike for climate. Check out what nine-year-old Serafina Bennett had to say at 1.00

00:18:40.040 Toronto's first Fridays for Future protest from March 15th. What do you think? Climate change,

00:18:46.280 climate strike. So this is from a new propaganda department of the CBC. I've talked to you about

00:18:51.520 it before. It's called CBC Kids News. They have adults write political commentary in simple language

00:18:58.280 and they have child actors read the lines and it's targeting your children. Their main issues,

00:19:05.000 I've been following this site fairly closely, are child sexuality. They're for it. Marijuana 1.00

00:19:10.740 legalization. They are obsessed with it. And global warming. So they've been in full damage control

00:19:17.360 more for Trudeau for a while now. And Serafina Bennett, she's a child actor. She's an actor

00:19:23.160 reading lines. That's what she does. She's nine. She's been served up as, well, I don't quite know what.

00:19:30.000 She's nine years old. When she's done doing this little video for the CBC, I'm guessing she'll go

00:19:36.200 for ice cream if she's been a good girl and then maybe a birthday party and then maybe some drawing

00:19:41.420 and homework stuff and then in bed by 830. But the CBC is putting her forward as some moral leader

00:19:47.500 and spokesman. Now that obviously could not happen with the cooperation and permission of her parents

00:19:52.960 who obviously are using her as a political battering ram. She's nine. Do you think the nine-year-olds go out

00:20:02.040 on strike from school on their own? Or like her reading scripts on TV that grown-ups write for her,

00:20:09.320 do you know that it's been manipulated by adults, by teachers unions, by the CBC itself, and by her parents

00:20:16.220 too. Whoever they are, we're never told. But listen to what she says. Listen to this clip

00:20:22.020 that actually is being viewed more than one million times on Twitter. Take a listen.

00:20:26.540 A lot of people are like, oh, what about the people in the oil industries and the electronic

00:20:33.340 industries and the paper industries? Well, it doesn't really matter what job you have if you're dead,

00:20:39.620 so. We're all going to die. We're all going to die. Who told her that? Is that science? 0.99

00:20:49.060 Well, another CBC kids propaganda show tells you, look at this cult. You say you love your children

00:20:58.740 above all else, and yet you're stealing their future in front of their very eyes.

00:21:04.540 A 15-year-old in Sweden has missed class every Friday since August to sit outside her country's

00:21:11.920 parliament, and she's been calling on others around the world to do the same.

00:21:16.660 Adults keep saying we owe it to the young people to give them hope.

00:21:22.980 But I don't want your hope. I don't want you to be hopeful. I want you to panic.

00:21:29.280 I want you to feel the fear I feel every day. And then I want you to act.

00:21:37.900 What a little cultish monster. It's like that Stephen King movie, Carrie.

00:21:43.900 But I don't blame her. I mean, she's a young girl with thousand-yard stare eyes.

00:21:50.820 But do you really think she made any of the decisions in her life to skip school on her own?

00:21:58.400 Do you think that happens? To write those bizarre, psychologically trippy comments about fear and

00:22:06.180 panic on her own? Do you think she wrote any of that on her own?

00:22:10.660 She is actually a victim here. Maybe a perpetrator too, but a victim primarily. I don't know who her

00:22:17.500 victimizers are in particular. Her parents, probably. School extremists, teachers unions,

00:22:22.660 probably. Politicians, surely. And of course, the CBC is trying to spread that child abuse here. 0.77

00:22:29.320 Of course, it's child abuse. Children deserve a childhood. You don't tell children of tender years

00:22:35.720 that the world is going to end and that you need to panic. That's crazy. That's maybe how

00:22:43.360 Catherine McKenna talks, but she's just a politician just doing it to get votes. You don't raise an 1.00

00:22:48.660 actual child that way. It is fake news, of course. Of course it is, but it's worse. This is deliberately

00:22:55.380 using children, child actors, reading lines written by adults to cause panic in your children. Look at

00:23:01.900 this insanity. People and animals have died, are dying, and will die because of the climate crisis.

00:23:09.320 No more coal! No more oil! Keep your carbon in the soil!

00:23:13.580 No more coal! No more oil! Keep your carbon in the soil!

00:23:19.680 So, time to panic. Did you see that? You're going to die like dinosaurs. Did you see that?

00:23:28.600 People are dying. We have 12 years to stand up to the grown-ups. We have to do something. I want you

00:23:35.560 to panic. These kids are 9, 10, 11 years old. Mainly girls, it seems. Who knows? Maybe they're

00:23:41.920 more eager to please their manipulative parents and teachers, whereas boys just say, yeah, whatever.

00:23:47.500 Can I go outside and kick a ball now? I don't know. Or maybe this is some gender action thing too. Who 1.00

00:23:52.240 knows? But this is what I do know. These kids are being abused psychologically, including at the

00:23:58.480 instruction of Justin Trudeau's state broadcaster. And they're trying hard to recruit your own

00:24:04.980 children into the abuse. Stay with us for more.

00:24:22.240 One week ago, I received a letter from a lawyer representing Justin Trudeau threatening to sue

00:24:30.400 me for my criticisms of his actions in the SNC-Lavalin corruption scandal. Upon receiving

00:24:36.960 Mr. Trudeau's letter, I immediately consulted with my legal team. And after careful consideration,

00:24:42.880 I was advised that Mr. Trudeau's complaints were without merit.

00:24:46.240 I stand by every single criticism I have made of Mr. Trudeau's conduct in regards to the scandal,

00:24:53.360 including those Mr. Trudeau's lawyer cites in his letter.

00:24:58.400 Well, that is a clip from Andrew Scheer's press conference yesterday, where he surprised a lot

00:25:03.760 of people, I think maybe even surprised a lot of liberals, that Justin Trudeau had hired a lawyer

00:25:10.000 to try and shut up the leader of the opposition. Is that a normal thing for a Prime Minister?

00:25:16.160 What is the Prime Minister to do to file a lawsuit in defamation against the leader of the opposition?

00:25:21.200 It sounds unusual to me, especially when the subject matter in question is something

00:25:25.840 that is in a genuine public debate that the entire country is gripped by. Joining us now is a lawyer who

00:25:33.360 once represented a Prime Minister, namely Stephen Harper. I'm talking about our friend Manny Montenegrino,

00:25:39.600 the head of ThinkSharp. And he joins us now via Skype. Hey, Manny, it's great to see you again. Welcome back.

00:25:44.880 Nice seeing you, Ezra. Manny, I know that you carefully read

00:25:48.800 the demand letter, the libel notice, I think it's styled as, by Julian Porter, who is a fairly

00:25:56.480 accomplished defamation lawyer. And I know you've read the reply, which is more succinct,

00:26:01.360 from Andrew Scheer's lawyer. What do you take on both documents? Why don't we start with the threat

00:26:06.320 letter sent by Julian Porter? Well, I'll start even before that. I can't see how any lawyer would take

00:26:15.520 that file on. You have incredible facts. This is a defamation case that is taken on by a Prime

00:26:25.520 Minister who has been cited by his own Attorney General as some form of pressure towards obstruction

00:26:33.600 of justice. This is a Prime Minister who has had five Attorney Generals write to the RCMP to

00:26:41.280 investigate for obstruction of justice. You have an ex-Attorney General of Ontario, Michael Bryant,

00:26:48.320 who said it's clear obstruction of justice. You have a Prime Minister who is let go indirectly

00:26:56.560 over a period of time, the Attorney General that was trying to protect him. And if that person came

00:27:02.560 into my office, the last thing I would do is say, let's start a defamation case. You know, particularly,

00:27:09.920 Ezra, when you've gone through all the trouble of keeping people quiet. You've silenced the Attorney

00:27:19.040 General Jody. You silenced Jane Philippot. You silenced the committees. There are two committees

00:27:25.120 that we're looking into. So you're trying to silence everybody, yet you want to commence an action

00:27:31.520 where you can no longer seek any silence. It is absurd. Ezra, you asked me a long time ago,

00:27:38.400 what advice would you give to the Prime Minister? And my advice at that time was, whatever you're

00:27:43.440 thinking of doing, do the opposite. Well, he's not taking my advice. I would have, if he came to my

00:27:49.120 office, I would have said, you are not sending a libel or a libel or defamation letter to the official

00:27:57.360 opposition when so much has happened since in the last five, six months. Right. It's absurd.

00:28:02.720 Well, and that's the thing. Julian Porter is a fairly well-known defamation lawyer. It's really

00:28:08.480 his specialty. I know, for example, I watched him work with McLean's Magazine on some very important

00:28:15.600 defamation. He's sort of famous for that. He's, I think he's been practicing probably 50 years.

00:28:23.200 So surely he knows how this is going to end. If it would go to court, Trudeau would have to give

00:28:30.960 real answers under oath. He couldn't bob and weave like he does in question period. He'd have to give

00:28:36.880 his records unredacted. He couldn't just unilaterally deny them. He would really be putting himself

00:28:43.840 through a colonoscopy, to use a medical term. Where was Julian Porter to say, whoa, boss,

00:28:50.240 I know you're mad, but we're not going to proceed. Well, that's what I think that's what he should

00:28:55.840 have done. I have done that with the prime minister on one occasion a long time ago. Julian Porter,

00:29:03.840 I believe is 83 years old right now. I do understand that he's got a great reputation in this field.

00:29:11.040 And sometimes lawyers do that. Sometimes it's about the lawyers and not necessarily about the client.

00:29:16.880 Um, I would have instruct, I would have certainly given the, given the evidence and then, and then

00:29:22.480 who comes into my office? I, you know, that's the one thing that I used to do. And I used to sit there.

00:29:27.920 Now I have a prime minister who has been found guilty five times of ethics breaches. I have a prime

00:29:36.720 minister who refused to recuse himself when he gave millions of dollars to a lobbyist. I have a prime

00:29:42.240 minister who accepted a gift from a lobbyist equating to somewhere around one to two hundred

00:29:49.360 thousand dollars these occasions. He's been cited five times for unethical practice. He's been found

00:29:54.720 guilty by the ethics commissioner. I have a prime minister who the ethics commissioner said you are

00:30:01.680 not credible in your assertion that the lobbyist or the Aga Khan is a family friend. When you have a

00:30:12.000 judge as, as, as prime minister Trudeau calls the ethics commissioner, a judge, when a judge says you're

00:30:18.080 not credible, uh, in your claim that the person is a friend and makes that as a finding in her report.

00:30:25.760 And you have basically, uh, all lawyers. I mean, you have, you have Warren Kinsella, who's also a lawyer,

00:30:33.920 saying this is obstruction of justice. And he worked in the, in the war room with the liberals. You have

00:30:38.560 basically a lot of attorney generals saying this is obstruction of justice. What are you doing putting the

00:30:45.760 case forward? That's the last thing that he should be doing. You have a McLean's article, uh, that basically calls

00:30:51.520 him an imposter. So I, I, I think this is probably that, well, you can't say the biggest mistakes

00:30:57.280 because he said it's just one of the many mistakes that he's doing. He's got a very, very weak legal

00:31:02.720 team. Um, when, when the attorney general said, I'm protecting you, uh, Mr. Prime Minister, there were

00:31:10.720 lawyers in the PMO's office that failed to protect the prime minister under rule of law. And they are,

00:31:16.960 and in my opinion, these people should step forward and say no. And the problem is, in my opinion,

00:31:23.120 is nobody has ever said no to Justin Trudeau. Well, that's such a key observation, his whole life.

00:31:30.240 I mean, I remember, I don't know if you remember in the 2015 campaign, Justin Trudeau was telling a

00:31:35.360 little family anecdote about, uh, one of his brothers who, uh, marijuana joints were found

00:31:42.320 on him by accident and his dad just picked up the phone and called some friends and made the problem

00:31:47.760 go away. So Justin Trudeau was boasting about how connected his dad was. Now he was trying to say,

00:31:53.920 I don't think anyone should be, you know, uh, uh, criminalized for having a joint, but

00:31:59.040 he accidentally told about how life is growing up as a Trudeau, you know, nothing, nothing,

00:32:05.040 nothing connects. And, and I think he thought he could just pull this one out of the bag too.

00:32:10.000 Yeah, no, I think the problem is he's not listening to great legal advice or he's not

00:32:15.280 getting great legal advice. He had the best lawyer in the world, in the world in Canada,

00:32:20.640 advising him. Jody Wilson-Raybould understood what was happening and tried to protect the prime

00:32:26.720 minister from himself. She actually stood up and said, no, this is not good for you. You should not

00:32:33.680 be interfering, obstructing or doing anything with respect to my decision. And she stood up 0.53

00:32:41.040 and what's happened to her. She's gone. She's out of the caucus. So you don't say no to the,

00:32:46.000 to Justin Trudeau and he needs more people around him to say, no, this was an insane. Now I love,

00:32:53.440 I read the letter from, from Andrew Scheer's lawyer. I don't know who this lawyer is.

00:32:58.160 I have never read such a great reply. Uh, just brilliant. Uh, if you can put up as the last

00:33:05.040 paragraph and I, I mean, what a, what a way to, to respond by saying, if you don't bring this case

00:33:12.480 forward, we will deem and assume that every statement made by Andrew Scheer is correct. And

00:33:18.320 you are accepting that. I mean, that is just exact. That is now another test that Trudeau

00:33:24.560 has to, has to jump over. Now he, what does he do? Does he drop the claim? If he drops the claim,

00:33:31.760 he's deemed to admit what was said. If he continues the claim, he's going to be cross-examined by very

00:33:37.360 sharp lawyers. And it will be, it will probably lead to criminal charges. If he gets examined,

00:33:44.000 he's been doing a good job of trying to avoid, uh, and I will say this, they've done a pretty good

00:33:50.960 job of trying to avoid criminal charges, uh, because of their hide and seek. But I tell you,

00:33:57.040 the, they better be very, very careful in this civil claim. Um, you know, they'd be very,

00:34:03.040 very careful that they don't invite that into their world as well. Yeah. Now you said something

00:34:07.440 a few minutes ago, and I just was imagining what it looked like when you said, you know, when someone

00:34:12.720 would come in and ask me for advice. Do you think in this case, Justin Trudeau personally

00:34:18.640 met with Julian Porter and said, I want to. No, no, not at all. Not at all. I mean,

00:34:23.760 and the reason, let me just add one more layer to the question. Then I'd love to hear your answer

00:34:26.880 because I, Gerald Butts was not a lawyer. I don't think, uh, chief of staff, um,

00:34:33.760 Katie Telford's a lawyer. I don't think so. No, no. Um, and, and I, Kate Purchase,

00:34:39.040 communications director. I don't think she's a lawyer. And like you say, Jody Wilson-Raybould

00:34:44.080 was sort of sacked for giving advice. He didn't want to hear. So I'm wondering who around Trudeau

00:34:49.120 would have said, this is a really good idea. Hey, Julian Porter, will you do this for us?

00:34:53.920 Because I, do you think Trudeau himself was actually warned? How do you think this went down?

00:34:59.920 I know this is speculation. I'm just curious. Well, yeah, no, I think the same people that

00:35:04.400 are making the same mistakes as he did with the instruction of justice that spent four months,

00:35:09.600 uh, uh, did the same mistake by calling, uh, uh, Julian Porter and saying, we want to begin that.

00:35:16.320 Now, Julian Porter didn't sit there and say, well, wait a minute. I don't know what he said,

00:35:21.600 but I certainly would have said no. I have said no, uh, to prime minister Harper, uh, on certain

00:35:27.360 occasions. So he, and he takes the answers. I mean, he, he, he's a, he's a very smart man.

00:35:32.720 That's guided by, by good advice. You can't say no, uh, to, uh, uh, Justin Trudeau. I'm surprised

00:35:39.920 that they didn't call. And according to the testimony, their friend quote Bev McLaughlin to

00:35:46.480 give an, to give an opinion. I mean, they don't respect the law. They do not respect, uh, what,

00:35:53.920 what it means or the risks related to it. And it's evident you have a back to back case like,

00:36:00.160 like, like to, to do now as well, there's two tests in adapt. Yeah. And you know,

00:36:04.960 this in, in, in defamation case, the defense could be truth or the defense could be fair comment.

00:36:10.560 I mean, clearly it, you know, to find truth, you'd have to get, uh, the prime minister under

00:36:16.560 cross-examination to get exactly what he said and when he said, and it could be proven to be true.

00:36:21.040 We don't know that, but certainly fair comment when you see all the commentary by, by attorney

00:36:26.480 generals, by lawyers, by the attorney general herself, Jade, uh, Jody, uh, Wilson Rolo.

00:36:32.400 She's already said it. You have, uh, you have everyone that's part of it saying it. So that's

00:36:37.760 where the defense is. And then you go to damages is the next test. I mean, if you, you have to go

00:36:43.680 through the whole case, what can the prime minister get in form of damages when his reputation worldwide is

00:36:50.960 already solid. When you have McLean's calling them an imposter, when you have two senior ministers,

00:36:57.840 the best ministers quit because they don't have trust in them. They're like, like, so why are you

00:37:03.120 beginning the claim? It's certainly not for damages. It's certainly not for, uh, and it's trying to stop

00:37:09.600 them from talking, but that just backfired on them. Yeah. I think so. Now, of course, whatever is said in

00:37:16.800 parliament itself has an immunity to defamation suits, it's called parliamentary privilege,

00:37:22.720 or, uh, you can really say, you could even theoretically call someone a murderer. Now,

00:37:27.920 of course, the speaker of the house is going to weigh in and say, please withdraw that. Yeah,

00:37:32.160 right, right. But defamation suits can't stop a leader of the opposition from raising things in the

00:37:38.880 house. But right. So I don't even know how this could even possibly work. Maybe it was to scare

00:37:47.440 other people like other journalists. But I mean, that's the thing, because everything Andrew Scheer

00:37:53.840 said has been said by columnists in a variety of publications. Absolutely. And the idea of suing,

00:38:00.320 I don't know, it just looks like they're scared. It doesn't look prime in the stereo when you're confident,

00:38:05.120 when you're on the march, you laugh off critics, you say, oh, yeah, you could just shout into the

00:38:09.920 wind, buddy. But when you stop, hire a fancy lawyer and threaten someone, you're all of a sudden

00:38:15.600 feeling a little smaller. That's, that's how I feel about. Well, yeah, there are cases where you,

00:38:21.920 you should and can use a defamation lawsuit. And either for the prime minister or the leader of

00:38:28.320 opposition, I handled three in those circumstances. There are cases and it makes sense. But in this

00:38:36.000 case, when the facts are just overwhelmingly against you, when you have a prime minister who has been

00:38:42.800 found unethical five times, when you have a prime minister who's been found not credible once by a

00:38:48.640 quasi judge, when you have when you have three months of attorney generals and lawyers of both stripes,

00:38:56.080 liberals and conservatives say this is this is obstruction of justice. This is borderline

00:39:02.880 criminal. This meets the test of one section, section 139 one of the criminal code. When you

00:39:08.640 have all that happening, I mean, you certainly don't say, hey, let's test this. I mean, you know,

00:39:15.360 every case that's happened before, and I do recall Prime Minister Harper used it because it was it was a

00:39:21.120 credible time to use it. It was the right time to stop allegations that were untrue. And he was

00:39:27.280 successful in it. And there was times when the prime minister or Mr. Prime Minister Harper was in

00:39:32.080 opposition. But in this case here, you have to be somewhat delusional to think that the facts support

00:39:39.920 a defamation case, particularly when every pretty well, every lawyer, you have a law society, you

00:39:49.280 have the law societies are commenting on this when pretty well everyone in the legal field is not on

00:39:56.960 your side. It's not a smart thing to begin a libel or slander suit. Let me ask you one last question,

00:40:03.600 because, of course, we think about censorship a lot over here. We've been the target of censorship

00:40:11.120 many times, even before the rebel started when I was at the Sun News Network at the Western Standard.

00:40:18.880 And what I've seen, Manny, is that government censors who used to come at you with the human

00:40:25.120 rights complaint or a hate speech complaint or even a defamation complaint, I think a lot of them are

00:40:31.200 moving to behind behind the scenes, talking directly to a Facebook or a YouTube or Twitter

00:40:37.360 and whispering, can you shut this guy down? And I see Facebook and other groups are talking about

00:40:45.280 cracking down on fake news in the run up to the election. And I'm worried, Manny, and I'd like your

00:40:51.440 thought on this. It's obvious that this is backfiring. This is blowing up in Trudeau's face,

00:40:56.880 this legal threat letter. But if Trudeau is able to whisper in the ear of his friend, Kevin Chan,

00:41:03.200 who runs public policy at Facebook, or whoever runs Twitter or YouTube in Canada, and get them to

00:41:09.840 throttle criticisms of him. Remember Trudeau's first remarks when this whole Jody Wilson-Raybould scandal

00:41:16.640 came out, he said it was completely false. So his first answer was it was false. Basically,

00:41:22.640 he was saying it was fake news. If he could have got Facebook, Twitter, YouTube to shut it down,

00:41:28.400 we wouldn't have known about it. And we wouldn't see what he's trying to do ham fistedly through a

00:41:33.680 lawyer. So my question to you, I'm sorry, I'm rambling a bit is, I think this defamation threat

00:41:39.760 is a laugh. And I think most people do. But what's not funny is that there's probably 10 other attempts to

00:41:46.640 squelch criticism of Trudeau that we don't even know about, that will never be put through the

00:41:52.320 rule of law. That'll just be him talking to friends in Silicon Valley. That's what I'm worried about.

00:41:57.040 But I it's hard to have evidence because it's behind the scenes. Well, it's already starting as well.

00:42:02.400 That's a very good point. I trust the courts. I like because when you take a process to the court,

00:42:08.800 as the prime minister tried with this defamation lawsuit, you are going to get incredible scrutiny.

00:42:14.960 You are going to be cross-examined and the truth will come out. And that's why this was a very

00:42:21.200 foolish move by the prime minister to commence a defamation lawsuit, especially when you're on

00:42:26.640 the brink of probably a criminal charge. But with respect to the underhanded, it's already started. 0.98

00:42:32.400 You had, and Ezra, it's good of you to point that out. And I think your listeners and your viewers

00:42:37.760 should know what's happening. You had the clerk send the first shot across the bow when he said,

00:42:44.040 you know, there's some, some terrible media out there, some, some, some, you know,

00:42:50.200 he called it some interference. And we are going to look into that to get rid of the, the fake news.

00:42:56.280 Then you had Christopher Freeland just say, well, there's going to be interference into our election.

00:43:01.320 They're setting up the premise to stop legitimate contest of this government, any legitimate,

00:43:10.040 a legitimate rebuttal. So it's already happening. And what, and that's the best way for liberals to do

00:43:16.200 it away from the scrutiny of a court or the objectivity, but through their underhanded channels,

00:43:24.120 you can stop any form of debate, any form of criticism, and you only have your message going

00:43:31.160 forward. And you're right, Ezra. I think it's going to accelerate. We saw two examples right now.

00:43:35.720 We're going to see maybe some legislation, or we're going to see some action. And of course,

00:43:40.200 this is all in the good of Canada, because we want to stop the negative discourse. I mean,

00:43:45.080 I heard on, on CBC, Rosemary Barton say that, that, that this defamation suit is, is,

00:43:53.720 and the response is not in the proper discourse of Canada, which was the leader of opposition's

00:44:00.280 response. Now that's just wrong. We need to have a healthy debate by the opposition,

00:44:05.960 by people on Twitter, by people, by Canadians. We just can't have the government tell us what we

00:44:11.320 need to hear, or what we need to, what's available to be heard. But you're, you're, you're bang on

00:44:16.360 point. And it's very scary. I think the next six months, you're going to see more censorship

00:44:20.680 initiatives than we have in the last 60 years. And I, I'm not exaggerating when I tell you that's my

00:44:27.320 prediction. Manny, great to see you again. Thanks for your time and your smarts. Good to see you again.

00:44:31.560 No problem. Take care, Ezra.

00:44:33.320 All right. That's our friend, Manny Montenegreno. He's the CEO of Think Sharp,

00:44:38.440 based in Ottawa. Stay with us. More ahead on The Rebel.

00:44:41.400 Hey, welcome back on my monologue Friday about America creating almost 200,000 new jobs

00:44:56.800 last month while Canada lost almost 10,000 jobs. Bruce writes,

00:45:01.800 what a stark contrast between free market America and Canada. Yeah. Yeah. You know what? And the,

00:45:08.100 the biggest contrast to me is on the energy sector. And maybe that's because I'm an Alberta

00:45:11.860 boy and I wrote those books about oil sands or fracking and I follow it. But you know,

00:45:17.620 we have so much more oil in Canada than America. And they're now a net exporter. How did we let that happen?

00:45:24.980 It's such good jobs. I, did we just, I don't know how we let that happen. That's not even that we're

00:45:30.100 socialist. I think we are to a degree. It's just that we blocked everything through politics and

00:45:35.860 through protests and through regulation and gender analysis and carbon analysis.

00:45:41.780 I don't know. I just, I just feel like they came in, you know, there's an old Jewish proverb,

00:45:47.060 two argue and the third grabs the hat. Yeah. You know, well, two, I want the hat. I want the hat.

00:45:52.820 And the third just reaches in and grabs it. While we're quarreling in Canada, America just grabbed

00:45:57.380 four million barrels a day worth of oil exports. You know how much money that is a year and the jobs?

00:46:02.620 I'm jealous. What can I say? I'm jealous. That should have been us. John writes,

00:46:07.660 so frustrated that we can't prosper from our natural resources because of Trudeau's anti-business,

00:46:12.140 gender analyzed, fake feminist, eco hysteria politics. It's like we are sitting on a million

00:46:16.780 gold bars, but refuse to sell any of it. You are right. And I can't think of another country in the

00:46:21.420 world that would be that way. I just, what country does not unlock the riches at its feet? I can't think

00:46:29.900 of any other place that would do that. And by the way, you know, the Scandinavians and the Brits

00:46:35.660 and all these folks who are so, the North Sea, they pump oil like crazy. I don't know. I just,

00:46:42.540 I can't think of any other country that's so self-destructive.

00:46:47.180 My interview with Bernard the Roughneck Hancock, Liza writes,

00:46:51.660 Bernard Hancock has more intelligence and integrity than the entire NDP government. He will make a very

00:46:56.460 effective politician. Canada needs more like him. I like Bernard and I like how real he is. I like

00:47:02.620 that he's actually worked on a rig. I like that he's not afraid to stand up to the left. And he's

00:47:07.740 sort of got that hipster look to him. He's got the big hair, sort of a signature look. I like him.

00:47:13.180 And I noticed that there's not a single anybody with any ties to oil and gas in the entire NDP

00:47:19.900 government of Alberta. And I think it shows. And I don't think that mathematically Bernard is going

00:47:25.900 to win in his riding. I like the guy and it would be great to have him in his MLA. I just don't think

00:47:30.300 being a member of the Freedom Conservative Party is going to punch through. That's just my prediction.

00:47:34.620 But I'm sure I'm glad he's running and I look forward to seeing what he does next because I hope

00:47:39.820 he continues to speak out. And by the way, I'm quite convinced Jason Kennedy is going to win the Alberta

00:47:44.700 election coming up on the 16th. Some new polls out show it's going to be huge. I think I predicted

00:47:49.660 earlier it was going to be maybe 20 seats for the NDP. There's 87 seats in the province. I think I said

00:47:57.260 20 for the NDP. I'm going to lower that. I'm going to say maybe 17, maybe even less than that. So it's

00:48:03.420 going to be important to have critics keeping the conservatives conservative, don't you think?

00:48:09.740 Margaret writes, I'm noticing too much fluff and fuss coming out of you guys.

00:48:14.300 Last month it was David and this week Kian. The focus is turning away good directed reporting

00:48:19.420 to creating a rebel focused issue altercation. It may not look like this to you, but from our side,

00:48:24.140 it's getting tiresome. Please put more effort into clean, concise reporting. No more self-focusing

00:48:29.020 events in the process, please. And a little more respect when interviewing will go a long way to

00:48:33.660 elevate the rebel to the respect it also deserves. Margaret, I thought about your letter very much

00:48:39.100 because I know it came from a good place. And I know that you are someone who cares about the rebel.

00:48:44.300 So I thank you for being so honest and constructive in your criticism.

00:48:49.420 That said, I'm going to disagree with you, at least in part,

00:48:54.140 because there are some times when a confrontation is necessary. And I think that if you're referring

00:49:00.540 to Kian going toe to toe with that actual real life communist who's running for the NDP in Alberta,

00:49:06.940 Anne McGrath and asking her if she regrets being a communist, I think you've got to have that

00:49:11.500 confrontation. I think so. And her reaction calling 911, yes, it was particular to Kian. And yes,

00:49:19.740 he became part of the story. But don't you think it's an important story to know that after

00:49:24.940 maybe 90 seconds worth of questioning on a public street, she calls police and not just like the

00:49:30.700 non-emergency numbers, she called 911. Don't you think that smoked out real interesting news? It was

00:49:37.100 entertaining too, I grant you that. But it's also real news, I thought. And I'm not sure exactly what

00:49:43.420 you're referring to from David, because he's always got a sense of humor. Look, David, I mean,

00:49:47.820 his nickname gives it away, the Menzoid. He's always had a great sense of humor to him. And so

00:49:52.780 you didn't mention it in your email, what you're talking about. Yeah, sometimes David becomes fun.

00:49:56.460 If you're talking about the altercation a few months ago, where he went on the hotel in Toronto,

00:50:02.220 that's been used as a refugee camp. And the manager came up and pushed him and his cameraman. Again,

00:50:07.660 David didn't stimulate that. The hotel manager didn't. As you may know, we're suing them for assault.

00:50:14.540 So unless there's another David story, I don't mean. So I think, yeah, listen,

00:50:18.700 the rebel is going to be spicier. Look at our name, the rebel. We're going to be a little spicier. 0.96

00:50:23.420 And I acknowledge once in a while, maybe we cross the line into too spicy. We go habanero pepper

00:50:28.780 instead of just Tabasco. But I tell you, there's so much vanilla out there occasionally to step into

00:50:35.580 habanero territory. You know, I don't, I'd rather do that than be vanilla all the time. You let me know

00:50:43.820 what you think of that, Margaret. Anyways, um, yeah, these, maybe you're thinking about the

00:50:49.100 lawn signs or Stop Notley lawn signs, but that's just plain fun. All right, folks, until tomorrow,

00:50:54.620 on behalf of all of us here at Rebel World Headquarters, good night. Keep fighting for freedom.

Rebel News Podcast - April 09, 2019

CBC propaganda： Child actors tell other kids they’re going to die from global warming

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript