Rebel News Podcast - September 25, 2026


EZRA LEVANT | Historian David Starkey warns Britain is fracturing after forgetting that nationhood takes generations

Hosted by
Mentioned
EZRA LEVANT | Canada's broken windows: the Innisfil garbage pile and the collapse of Canada's civic standards

Episode Stats


Length

56 minutes

Words per minute

142.9

Word count

8,110

Sentence count

388

Harmful content

Misogyny

8

sentences flagged

Toxicity

34

sentences flagged

Hate speech

58

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 My friends, you're in for a treat. One of the smartest people I've ever met, one of the most
00:00:04.680 interesting. And it's not just because I'm an Anglophile, but Dr. David Starkey is brilliant.
00:00:10.880 He's also been the target of a cancel culture de-platforming. So he's been in the trenches of
00:00:17.780 the culture war too. What an interesting man. I think you'll think so too. And he just,
00:00:23.780 he's a kind of public intellectual. I don't even know if we have someone like him in Canada.
00:00:27.780 Up next, Dr. David Starkey.
00:00:31.160 But first, let me invite you to become a subscriber to what we call Rebel News Plus.
00:00:35.000 It's the video version of this podcast.
00:00:37.460 Just go to rebelnewsplus.com, click subscribe, and you're in.
00:00:45.500 You're listening to Rebel News Podcast.
00:00:47.900 tonight a feature interview with a leading british scholar and historian you're not going
00:01:03.100 to want to miss this david starkey is one of a kind it's september 25th and this is the ezra
00:01:08.840 LeVant Show. Shame on you, you censorious bug. Well, I'm delighted to introduce to you today
00:01:27.840 a great thinker. There still are some of them around, a public intellectual. David Starkey,
00:01:34.700 The CBE, Commander of the British Empire, is a British historian, author, and television presenter who taught at the London School of Economics for 26 years and is best known for his books and documentaries on Henry VIII, Elizabeth I, and the history of the British monarchy.
00:01:51.060 So what on earth could he have to say about today?
00:01:54.460 Well, a great many things, because if you forget the past, you're doomed to replay it, or at least it's failures.
00:02:02.240 I think one of the whole points of being conservative is that you learn that other people have gone through these things before you.
00:02:08.720 And maybe they fought a battle to give us a freedom that we take for granted.
00:02:15.240 Maybe they learn things the hard way.
00:02:17.380 Joining us now is Dr. Starkey.
00:02:20.180 How has being a historian enabled you to deal with current events?
00:02:27.020 Because when I see you being interviewed or talking, it's on current events.
00:02:32.240 What use or asset has your study of history been for you?
00:02:38.560 I wouldn't be commenting on current events without it.
00:02:42.740 You made the central point there.
00:02:44.740 If you are a conservative, you believe that the present is a product of the past,
00:02:50.100 that we are rooted in our very specific past, in our specific national past,
00:02:57.880 if you are British or English, in your Canadian past,
00:03:01.040 which is, of course, an aspect of the great British diaspora and so on.
00:03:06.840 And for me, without that grounding in the past, I would feel, I'm going to use an odd word,
00:03:15.500 I would feel illiterate in the present.
00:03:18.460 And I've been profoundly influenced, as so many of us have been, by modern thinkers like Roger Scruton,
00:03:24.640 But much more by the, you talked in your introduction about the past having dealt with the problems of the present, what we are undergoing in Britain at the moment, or have undergone, is a quasi-revolution, an extraordinary change in our customs, our manners, our constitution, our way of living, the nature of our population,
00:03:48.540 which corresponds directly to the events of 200 years ago,
00:03:54.380 the French Revolution, also crucially important
00:03:57.800 for the separate existence of Canada,
00:04:00.080 when Britain led the great coalition
00:04:02.580 that destroyed the power of the French Revolution
00:04:05.520 in the form of the unbelievably aggressive military tyranny of Napoleon
00:04:12.360 and the great philosopher who emerged from that.
00:04:15.660 He's both a philosopher and interestingly enough,
00:04:18.360 Ezra, he's a practicing politician as well, Edmund Burke. Burke comes up with this extraordinary
00:04:25.220 phrase, remember the great slogan of your neighbor to the south, which had rebelled against Britain a
00:04:31.460 little while before, the idea of a social contract of all human society, depending on an explicit
00:04:41.040 action of will, and the French Revolution taking that very much further. The great response to it
00:04:47.380 his Edmund Burke. And he comes up with this wonderful phrase, which addresses exactly what
00:04:52.760 you are asking me. If human society is a contract, it's a contract between the living, the dead,
00:05:00.480 and those yet to be born. In other words, we are not creatures simply of will. We're creatures
00:05:07.160 of inheritance. One of the things that we've most forgotten, and particularly those of a
00:05:13.620 socialist disposition or the passionate individualist liberal is, we don't pop into the world. 0.98
00:05:19.760 I mean, no more stupid sentence has ever been written than that man is born free and yet 0.98
00:05:26.060 everywhere is in change. 0.99
00:05:27.760 You know, you're not born free, as the great St. Augustine, and I am no Christian, said
00:05:32.540 very explicitly, you are born and you will forgive me if I use a good direct translation 0.99
00:05:37.560 of his words amidst piss and shit. 0.99
00:05:39.640 You as a baby are this creature which is absolutely dependent on your literal inheritance of your parents, your family, the world you're born into. 1.00
00:05:50.140 You don't create it.
00:05:51.380 You don't create the ideas you grew up with.
00:05:53.600 You don't create the language you grew up with.
00:05:56.060 They're all products of history.
00:05:58.220 And until we recognize, and anyway, the catastrophe of the present, Ezra, is precisely the attempt at cutting ourselves off from that.
00:06:07.320 You make me think of the phrase, a man is born or a child is born and you have 18 years to civilize him. 0.92
00:06:14.660 He's born a barbarian, when you think about it. 0.72
00:06:16.700 And you've got 18 years to turn him into a citizen and a man and a part of society. 0.80
00:06:21.680 What do you think of that?
00:06:23.360 Yes, I mean, but remember the great message of the French Revolution and those American thinkers to the south of you who were so profoundly influenced by it.
00:06:33.160 I mean, the Jeffersons and whatever of this world, many of them thought quite the opposite.
00:06:37.620 They think society is what makes us barbarous and brutal.
00:06:42.660 And instead, we are born this wonderful, perfect creature.
00:06:47.360 And all human beings, of course, are fundamentally the same.
00:06:51.120 And, you know, we've experienced the truth or otherwise, it's very much otherwise of this notion, Ezra, with some of the imports we've had recently. 0.70
00:07:00.000 You know, the kindness of our heart opened the doors of Great Britain to, for example, ex-Afghan soldiers, you know, and we very politely removed their Kalashnikovs, you know, presumably giving them a kind of certificate of authority and an agreement to pay them back for it. 0.98
00:07:18.520 And we trimmed their beards up and we brought them here and we sort of put them down in Richmond on Thames and encouraged them to go to the Dog and Duck and drink half a pint of cider. 0.88
00:07:28.220 And, you know, the women of Britain, until unfortunate things happen to them, think those men just like us. 1.00
00:07:35.940 The infinite, stupid folly. 0.99
00:07:40.240 Now, let me go back a bit, because you were talking about Burke and Napoleon and the French Revolution. 1.00
00:07:46.140 And you were talking about history and a little bit of philosophy.
00:07:50.540 Those are delights to study.
00:07:52.420 And I think that you have an important role.
00:07:54.820 But you've also had an amazing privilege to spend your time studying and thinking when ordinary people don't have that.
00:08:04.280 And so here's my question. How can an ordinary person, how can a interested but busy person live a life that is true to history and the philosophies you describe if they either don't have the time or the ability to bury themselves deep into thinkers like Burke?
00:08:23.920 How do you transmit a national mindset, a national sense of values?
00:08:31.420 You are a keeper of, you're a dealer of intellectual ideas.
00:08:36.540 What about a factory worker?
00:08:38.520 How does he inculcate the values of the United Kingdom?
00:08:42.660 How can he help stand guard against their frittering away?
00:08:47.680 Well, it was what universal education was invented for.
00:08:51.700 And one of the dreadful things is that too many of us, too many teachers at every level, have abandoned the central task.
00:08:59.640 The central task of a teacher is to transmit a culture.
00:09:05.280 And the great problem is we decided that we were about something else.
00:09:09.340 We thought our duty was to criticize, to innovate, to reshape.
00:09:14.680 Now, criticism and innovation and reshaping are crucially important.
00:09:18.520 My own academic career depended on extensive, the tutors, extensive revisions of what other people had thought and said about it.
00:09:28.400 But what they fundamentally depend on is knowledge, is knowing.
00:09:33.500 And one of the great problems with modern teaching is that it's abandoned the idea of knowledge.
00:09:40.760 Indeed, it's very largely abandoned an idea of truth.
00:09:44.040 And this seems to me to be one of the ways in which our societies have gone so radically and fundamentally wrong.
00:09:50.980 But I think there's a kind of self-corrective.
00:09:54.380 It's easy to be gloomy.
00:09:56.440 It's easy to wring hands and say we're at the end of times and there are some sides that we are.
00:10:01.820 But equally, one of the things that strikes me, and I've just returned,
00:10:05.520 and indeed I didn't think I was going to make this interview in time,
00:10:08.680 Because last night I was speaking in the sleepy countryside, the sleepy English countryside still exists on the Welsh border called the Marches outside a wonderful town, tiny little city called Hereford Cathedral City.
00:10:26.700 And there, there was an audience of about 100 people who were prepared to listen to myself and my colleague in popular conservatism, Mark Littlewood, talk for an hour and a half, including really vigorous, detailed questioning on what has gone wrong with the British Constitution since Tony Blair.
00:10:51.440 And can you imagine that?
00:10:53.460 There is, I think there's an appetite for knowledge.
00:10:56.160 I mean, specifically in the area of history, I am constantly, I'm stopped so many times in the street by people saying, you know, usually a bit shy.
00:11:07.280 Actually, you are David Stockton.
00:11:10.020 Yes, I have a couple of work, you know, please keep on.
00:11:13.700 And then some of them will, if I've got a bit of time and indicate I have, will want to talk.
00:11:18.340 And I think very often, you know, people develop a passion for a subject like history as they get older themselves and they realize they have a history.
00:11:29.620 I think also this extraordinary sense of rootlessness, which has happened partly because of social and economic change, partly because of emigration, partly because of the triumph of the radical left.
00:11:43.780 It leads people to ask the question, where do I come from?
00:11:48.340 I'm not really as ruthless as these people claim.
00:11:50.960 I have memories that tell me there was a different world.
00:11:55.020 And so I think that there is, there's a self-correction.
00:11:58.240 And the thing that most strikes me, just to again, Ezra, end on an optimistic note.
00:12:04.160 If you look at one of the great dystopian novels, that's to say, the 1984 and the world of George Orwell.
00:12:14.740 What is striking is that those who are corrupted, those who are in the party, those who have to believe the lies of Newspeak, they are the highly educated.
00:12:27.420 The backers of all the great revolutions have been the ultra-educated.
00:12:32.940 And ordinary people, you know, and this sounds terribly patronizing, but do remember, with my posh accent and my Oxbridge background, my father was a toolmaker.
00:12:44.740 He left school at 11.
00:12:46.920 I come from that world.
00:12:49.060 I know about that.
00:12:50.700 And what we've got to believe fundamentally is that that ordinariness, 0.92
00:12:56.260 that ability to look at, you know, listen to the silly rhetoric of trans men and men, trans women and women, 0.98
00:13:05.680 this sort of nonsense, and to kick a stone like good old Dr. Johnson 0.97
00:13:10.300 when he was confronted with the ideas of Bishop Barclay
00:13:13.580 that the world only exists because God is looking at it.
00:13:17.260 And what did good old Dr. Johnson do?
00:13:20.280 He's kicked a stone and said, I refute him.
00:13:24.460 In other words, there's a thing, there's a fact,
00:13:27.040 there's a thing you can feel, you can kick.
00:13:29.880 And so often those outside the academy,
00:13:33.720 those who don't lead a life which is just the life of words,
00:13:38.240 best understand it. 1.00
00:13:40.300 I remember that line from 1984, if there's any hope, it's with the proles, the nickname for the working class. 0.89
00:13:48.280 Exactly, exactly. 0.84
00:13:50.520 Let me ask about something you indicated about history.
00:13:56.280 I like referring to the indigenous peoples of the United Kingdom.
00:14:02.620 I like thinking about the centuries of the history, because everywhere else around the world, there's great care taken for indigenous culture.
00:14:14.880 Here in Canada, it's an enormous struggle session.
00:14:18.740 We're told that we're genociders.
00:14:21.340 We have, you know, that the land exists.
00:14:23.340 There's a kind of indigenous title to the land.
00:14:26.800 And we don't actually own land, even though most of it was seated in treaties of surrender.
00:14:32.620 So I think when you look at the United Kingdom and Ireland, too, for that matter, and look at the centuries or millennia of life, I think it's interesting that the only indigenous culture that is not respected or respectable by this new thinking is that of the West.
00:14:50.940 But of course there's an indigenous history in the UK. I think that they need to destroy that legitimate land-rooted nationalism before they can attack the UK. Give me your thoughts on that. I don't know if I articulated myself clearly. 0.68
00:15:08.960 You do articulate yourself very clearly. I mean, let's again look at the conventional narrative, the conventional narrative on the left and indeed the center left and indeed, in some ways, our official narrative is we are a nation of immigrants.
00:15:24.340 Well, in one sense, it's true. And a very large part of the population, modern DNA analysis suggests, has in fact been here since the Bronze Age or earlier, maybe much earlier.
00:15:38.960 But there were waves of invaders, there were Romans, and there were Anglo-Saxons, and there were Danes, and there were dribbles of French Huguenots, and there were occasional Jews, and there were lots of Irish at various points, and so on and so on.
00:15:54.200 But the thing that is really striking is that all those groups meld into one.
00:16:01.560 We develop an extraordinary and unique fused language in the age of Chaucer in the 14th century, which has dominated the world.
00:16:13.500 And we had a very stable population.
00:16:17.040 I mean, the immigrations of French Huguenots, the immigrations of German Jews and whatever,
00:16:24.020 Russian Jews, the refugees from the terrible pogroms of the 19th century.
00:16:28.760 There were a few tens of thousands at the most.
00:16:32.080 And what happened was, I mean, think about it.
00:16:35.620 When the Norman conquest happened, the Norman invaders, there weren't terribly many of them,
00:16:41.080 were a vile, foreign, oppressive force.
00:16:44.560 It was colonial conquest of the most brutal sort. 0.97
00:16:48.120 But the two groups meld and fuse and become one.
00:16:52.640 And the influence of Anglo-Saxon England is fused in this most extraordinary way
00:17:00.560 with the systematization, the high Christian culture of the Normans.
00:17:06.380 Similarly, the French immigrants, the Protestant immigrants, the fleeing from the Catholic persecution of Louis XIV and the Huguenots, become English in time.
00:17:24.300 And this is one of the things we've forgotten.
00:17:26.320 It is the effect of time.
00:17:28.120 So we have somebody. It's rather wonderful. You've got this in France, except your French population has deliberately maintained this distinction because, of course, of numbers and the fact that they occupy a large specific area, the area of Quebec.
00:17:46.420 But in Britain, people like de la Billière is a good Englishman, indeed he's an English general, but he's time.
00:17:56.140 And the biggest example of it is actually our royal family.
00:17:59.840 Those who are malicious constantly describe King Charles as a German.
00:18:04.960 Well, indeed, by his ancestry, before the beginning of the 20th century, apart from that tiny little dribble of Stuart blood that comes via the daughter of Charles I, he is indeed German.
00:18:24.380 And the British royal family kept itself German for 200 years by constantly marrying back to Germany.
00:18:31.000 But you know what happened? At the beginning of the 20th century, they decided to become, and they decided they had to become, because of the new sense of powerful sense of nationalism engendered by the First World War, they decided to become English.
00:18:46.260 They changed their name, Ezra, from whatever it was, Saxe-Colbert-Gotha, to Windsor.
00:18:53.060 They changed the rules of the house, though they marry Englishmen and Englishwomen.
00:18:58.560 They identify in a dramatically different way.
00:19:05.200 I mean, you mentioned my CD, which is a bit of a joke.
00:19:08.420 And remember, back in the time of my cancellation in 2020, it was a very determined attempt to remove it, which I fought to the death, not because I particularly value it, but because I won't let anybody steal things from me, particularly on bad grounds.
00:19:23.800 But the order of the British Empire is founded in that same year that you changed the name, function, and really the nationality of the monarchy.
00:19:33.220 And you know what it's created for?
00:19:34.880 It's created to do what the monarchy had never done before, which is to recognize a kind of democracy of achievement.
00:19:43.540 The great orders of chivalry, and the garter, and the Patrick in Ireland, Thistle in Scotland,
00:19:50.800 and they've got a couple of dozen members, something like that.
00:19:53.780 The Order of the British Empire from the beginning was conceived of to have thousands, literally thousands.
00:20:00.800 Another order of chivalry, believe it or not, the Companion of Honor, was created to reward socialists and trade unionists.
00:20:07.940 Would you actually believe it? It's true.
00:20:10.140 But the thing that symbolizes it all, and I try and drive home this extraordinary shift in the nature of monarchy in 1917,
00:20:19.560 the first investiture of the Order of the Duchenne Empire.
00:20:23.640 Well, I'll give you a little test.
00:20:25.320 Guess where the first investiture took place.
00:20:28.480 Nowadays, it's almost invariably in either Windsor or Buckingham Palace,
00:20:33.700 in Buckingham Palace, in the drawing room.
00:20:36.440 Where was the first investiture?
00:20:38.860 Huh. Boy, I can't guess.
00:20:42.200 Think of somewhere infinitely improbable.
00:20:45.560 Huh.
00:20:46.360 okay you're not going to get it and nobody does ibrox park football stadium at glasgow
00:20:55.080 no i wouldn't guess that in front of an audience of thousands and thousands of munition workers
00:21:03.060 and and and soldiers and so on and that that was the so in other words what we've got to look at
00:21:10.320 When we're looking at this question of indigeneity or Englishness, we do in fact have a settled, a population that was settled for the best part of a thousand years, which is actually quite a long time.
00:21:23.980 If you look at your so-called indigenous people and that agitated question of which tribe occupied where, you will usually find that they were there for about four decades before they were, because they were constantly moving.
00:21:38.780 that they're highly mobile and so for the people to be the broad mass of the people because the
00:21:45.780 large-scale invasion stops a thousand years ago with the Norman conquest and even then the number
00:21:52.180 of Normans wasn't all that very great but you have a settled people for a thousand years in which
00:21:57.380 important groups of foreigners arrive are seen as being foreign to begin often very much dislike
00:22:04.500 But then assimilate and become as English as everybody else.
00:22:10.040 And the big question, Ezra, is going to be whether, you know, in one of the questions being agitated at the moment, I can see you follow things online in Britain pretty closely.
00:22:21.480 You may remember there was this tremendous debate about whether our former prime minister, the Indian extraction, and the Hindu, a practicing Hindu, the Rishi Sunak, can be called English.
00:22:33.380 Now, my answer to that clearly at the moment is, despite the fact he's an exquisite English accent, that he is in culture, behavior, in everything apart from religion, a passion for cricket, his utter decency, since he's the only one of our prime ministers that's actually bothered to stay on in parliament and actually to serve.
00:22:55.800 In other words, a man imbued with that old-fashioned English concept of public duty.
00:23:01.900 But he can't be English at the moment because not enough time has gone by.
00:23:07.200 Now, it may very well be in, I don't know what, two generations, three generations,
00:23:13.400 because we have rather a lot of very decent, highly civilized Hindus, British Hindus and British Indians settling in Britain.
00:23:22.280 We may decide, just like the French Huguenot beforehand, they have become English, but it's not yet.
00:23:29.660 And it's one of the problems, of course, with modern attitudes to immigration.
00:23:34.140 We somehow think that just by giving a little document, here's a British passport, here's a Canadian passport,
00:23:40.860 miraculously, you are just as British as Canadian or somebody whose family has been there for,
00:23:46.420 well, in the case of Canada, six or seven generations.
00:23:49.500 In the case of Britain, 22 into the recesses of time.
00:23:57.100 Once again, Ezra, history, time.
00:24:01.160 We've forgotten the dimension of time.
00:24:04.500 Remember, and it's extraordinary we have,
00:24:06.600 because the great change of 20th century science,
00:24:10.200 the work of Einstein, is about time.
00:24:15.700 We have the brief history of time.
00:24:18.280 one of the most famous unread books ever written.
00:24:22.480 Again, Stephen Hawking's great theories were on the nature of time.
00:24:29.080 And if you can see it as this actually shaping the physical universe,
00:24:34.480 how much more does the affliction, the flowing of time,
00:24:38.740 the changes and the tides in the affairs of men,
00:24:43.700 at least as important as the tides of the ocean,
00:24:46.480 and how much how much more do they they actually change make remakers we've forgotten earlier you
00:24:54.200 talked about people having a memory of what things were like and um that memory is kept alive
00:25:02.180 uh i think in part through people who have high high stations or i think of the archbishop of
00:25:09.680 Canterbury, someone who has a job. But here's my question. I'm sure you saw the shocking photo
00:25:17.960 on 9-11, the anniversary of the terror attacks in America, where the Archbishop of Canterbury
00:25:25.820 was giving an award to a Pakistani imam who attended with his wife, who was fully covered
00:25:34.880 in a face-concealing niqab. 0.95
00:25:37.420 And I didn't understand it until it was pointed out to me 0.98
00:25:40.280 that the award, which was a ribbit, a medallion on a ribbon,
00:25:45.100 was put on his wife, not on him,
00:25:48.340 even though he was the recipient of the award,
00:25:50.500 because he refused to have the Archbishop of Canterbury,
00:25:53.940 who was a woman, touch him. 0.90
00:25:56.260 So he brought his wife because a woman... 1.00
00:26:00.360 A coat hanger. He brought his wife as a coat hanger. 0.99
00:26:02.940 And she's as anonymous as can be.
00:26:04.380 she she's like a ninja covered completely so tell me what you think of that tell me what
00:26:11.300 meaning that has now it was later found out that he said horrific things about
00:26:15.800 terrorism and it was rescinded but that's not even the point
00:26:18.740 there is a kind of madness isn't there and it's um it's an understandable madness i call it
00:26:28.220 hyper-liberalism and canada is of course or was at the absolute vanguard you were a country
00:26:36.140 remade by the truders to be a post-nation nation weren't you and uh what what mulalli i mean uh you 1.00
00:26:44.140 know it fortunately rhymes with the english phrase do lally this appalling woman who has become 0.94
00:26:50.540 Archbishop of Canterbury and she is an example of this extreme and ultra liberalism and it's based
00:26:59.160 of course on again quite extraordinary ignorance and and I think I mean again let's say this
00:27:07.640 frankly about I mean I happen I'm a non-Christian I'm interested in religious history I have many
00:27:13.520 friends in the Church of England and they tell me that when the Archbishop of Canterbury remember
00:27:18.800 she was a nurse before her very important nurse she was chief nursing officer which means of
00:27:24.040 course she's at the center of the whole dei project you know if if you're at that level
00:27:29.400 in the so-called caring profession that's what you are so she's the she she she has a late vocation
00:27:36.080 she has to go to divinity school and i am reliably informed that it was when she she had her title
00:27:42.900 as it were when she was accepted for ordination a condition was attached that normally she
00:27:50.140 wouldn't preach because she was not sufficiently theologically literate to do it and again it is
00:27:57.400 the problem you know Anglicanism used to be Church of England used to be a religion that prided itself
00:28:04.520 on its scholarship all the great Anglicans going right back to Cranmer and the the the great
00:28:11.860 archbishop the 17th 18th 19th century into the 20th century right up to something like rowan
00:28:17.940 williams are scholars they're profoundly learned in the history of the church in in the greek and
00:28:24.760 latin classics and so on and steeped in that history and you now have a woman who clearly
00:28:31.380 and i'm going to use the brutal term especially because it will offend the gentleman whose honor 1.00
00:28:36.360 was removed, is pig ignorant. And the great problem, again, is to let's try to understand 0.99
00:28:43.200 what went wrong with that. We have now decided that all religion is fundamentally a private
00:28:51.460 matter, even though Anglicanism is in theory a national church. What else is created by Henry
00:28:58.380 VIII as a national church? And therefore we assume that Islam is simply a private matter too. But of 0.95
00:29:06.040 course, this is an absolute nonsense. No practice Muslim thinks of it as simply an individual matter. 1.00
00:29:12.760 Islam is not a religion. Islam is a complete structure of life, law, politics, a broader
00:29:20.800 loyalty to the Umar, that's the entire Muslim world, that transcends any specific regional
00:29:27.900 particular or particularly an acquired loyalty by citizenship to somewhere like Britain. 0.83
00:29:35.060 And the sheer absurdity of treating Islam just as though, you know, it was as Christianity has become, but it's based on ignorance. 0.89
00:29:48.000 It's based on a refusal to think. 0.62
00:29:50.580 And again, you know, one of the great problems, again, about the hyper-liberal movement is that it makes this terrible error.
00:30:00.500 I began with the joke about the Afghani.
00:30:02.880 because we're all the same and of course we're not all the same this is not particularly to say
00:30:09.820 though I actually believe it that we in the west or particularly being an Englishman you may
00:30:15.700 remember that it always used to be said that if you were English you know you've been you've been 1.00
00:30:20.180 born with the ultimate silver spoon in your mouth and I still by and large believe that's true but
00:30:26.680 But it's simply we've got to recognize human difference, that culture, religion, tradition really do make us different, and that those differences are absolutely fundamental.
00:30:38.900 And so when you import large numbers of people, you will remember Boris Johnson's brutal words of women who wear bin bags, you're importing something which is radically different.
00:30:53.280 They do not have an individualistic culture.
00:30:56.140 Ours is an individualistic culture with all the institutions of state, law, education, religion and everything else designed to cope with that.
00:31:05.840 If you import people who have a radically different view, which is essentially communitarian, 0.97
00:31:12.000 is based on either the religious group or much more dramatically in the case of a typical immigrant in Britain.
00:31:20.140 I know nothing about Canada, a typical immigrant in Britain from Pakistan or the Punjab or whatever.
00:31:26.140 You're part of a clan. You're part of a tribe. Your loyalties are fundamentally to the tribe.
00:31:33.740 So in the famous rape gangs, the infamous rape gangs we have in Britain, they're not gangs.
00:31:39.660 They're extended families. The rape is done by father, son, uncle, cousin, brother-in-law,
00:31:47.020 and so on, but they operate like a mafia, which is often based, you know, the mafia again
00:31:56.140 are called a family, and because we refuse to acknowledge these differences, because
00:32:02.360 we croon away all the same, I mean, remember, the very notion of universal human rights
00:32:09.360 assumes you have a universal human being, which is self-evident in nonsense, but it
00:32:16.720 has led to our abandonment of frontiers, our abandonment of the notion that the first duty
00:32:23.120 of the state is to distinguish between the citizen and the foreigner and to protect the
00:32:28.160 citizen if need be from the foreigner. We've literally lowered our guard, shattered our 0.99
00:32:35.520 frontiers. There's so many interesting things you've said. I think your point about the clans
00:32:40.640 being behind the rape gangs is one reason why the West has had such a difficult time of
00:32:46.340 understanding them because i don't think any of us could call up 10 friends and say
00:32:53.340 you know we are going to rape a girl all night why don't you come and help keep this crime a secret
00:33:01.140 like it's unthinkable it's contrary to to everything our culture has taught us and we 0.92
00:33:07.760 don't even know it it's so we take it for granted like a fish doesn't know it's in water
00:33:11.900 and the idea that there could be cadres of men
00:33:17.340 who would commit these horrific crimes
00:33:19.680 and then the next day... 0.89
00:33:22.260 Not ridiculous crimes.
00:33:23.600 I mean, the point is,
00:33:25.560 I remember, these are countries
00:33:28.280 where there is absolutely no...
00:33:31.240 I mean, you described the woman in her bin bag
00:33:35.080 just being used as a coat hanger
00:33:36.980 around which to drape a medal 0.70
00:33:38.840 And the fact that not even an archbishop is permitted to touch an imam, these are countries where there is simply no notion that a woman has any rights. 0.98
00:33:51.660 I mean, the only reason you can rape a woman is because either she or her husband has got rights. 0.86
00:33:58.140 The only right that they would recognize if a woman is raped is the fact that her husband or family would be dishonored, or her brothers would be dishonored.
00:34:09.040 And we, again, just are incapable of imagining ourselves into that world with the result that we fall victim to it.
00:34:18.920 Because, again, going alongside that clan structure, there is also a structure of finance.
00:34:26.740 There's a complete political structure, there's a takeover of political institutions, to which we are vulnerable, because we will not acknowledge the difference, we will not acknowledge the distinction.
00:34:40.420 But you see, again, you also asked me a question about the claim that we as whites, and particularly British or English, don't have a culture.
00:34:52.100 It is very typically made by somebody, black or brown, dressed up in funny clothes.
00:34:59.640 You may remember there was the famous incident where an extraordinary woman dressed really rather like a bar stool in Las Vegas and had an interchange between Lady Hussey at court.
00:35:17.620 And Lady Hussey, confronted by this woman dressed like a bar stool in leopard skin and assorted feathers and whatever, and knowing a bit about Africa, asked where she was from.
00:35:27.600 And the woman, of course, took huge outrage, proclaiming that she was British, whilst having a very funny name, which turned out to be completely confected.
00:35:39.160 But why is there that notion?
00:35:42.080 Because, of course, if you are English, you descend from the people who invented the modern world. 0.80
00:35:51.080 Everybody dresses, still a formal wear, in a woolen suit or suit that's made. 1.00
00:35:57.600 look like wool. That is a form of dress invented in England in the early 19th century, which
00:36:04.200 replaces the absurd extravagance of the French abbey, the thing with silk velvet, cascading
00:36:12.360 laces and whatever, as a practical form of attire for practical people. And obviously
00:36:19.420 it can be well cut, more or less well cut and so on, but it's clothes that you can go
00:36:24.380 outside it you couldn't go outside in the dress of a french nobleman it would be torn off your
00:36:29.340 a it would be damaged by the rain or it would be torn off your back uh by by the mob because the
00:36:35.340 individual items are so valuable so we invent a world in which the two clients the upper and
00:36:41.320 lower classes can actually mingle and move because of the way you dress and that we invent a world
00:36:47.140 of course of industrialization of you wear you wear the black black business attire we invent a
00:36:56.820 world of of science a world of of the beginnings of democracy and the beginnings of responsible
00:37:04.720 government and so on so we we as it were create the world in which all of these people live but
00:37:11.280 It's become more the outside aspects of it, the dress, the style, the language.
00:37:17.980 Everybody sort of has a parliament.
00:37:19.960 They all claim, even China and whatever, claim to be a democracy and so on.
00:37:24.640 But in other words, what was particular to England, to Britain, has become universal.
00:37:31.040 That's why they're claimed not to have a culture.
00:37:33.660 And you know, Israel, it is very important because I think, obviously, if you are highly educated British,
00:37:41.280 You know this.
00:37:42.720 If you're not highly educated, you are left with a very great problem.
00:37:47.860 You mentioned the business of education to begin with. 0.95
00:37:50.780 One of the most pathetic things that I've ever read is a little story of a girl coming from a very modest family. 0.90
00:38:00.140 And her school said, you've all got to turn up wearing something to do with your culture. 0.97
00:38:08.300 But you mustn't wear a flag.
00:38:11.280 And what did she do? She turned up in a Union Jack dress saying, this is my culture, to be expelled and whatever. 0.53
00:38:21.680 And one of the reasons why there's been all this raising of flags, which actually in Britain we didn't used to do, we didn't need that,
00:38:29.080 has been exactly that sense of, well, everybody speaks the language of Shakespeare.
00:38:35.160 Everybody's got a parliament. Everybody is now modern. What's peculiar to us?
00:38:40.500 So having invented this that's all become universal, there is that sense of, well, do we have to become particular?
00:38:51.240 And it's a great challenge, you see.
00:38:53.560 It's a great challenge.
00:38:55.380 My joke about being born English and being the silver spoon, we were the first universal people since the Romans,
00:39:05.800 a language that the world speaks a system of law that in many ways the world embraced a set of
00:39:12.760 universal attitudes that became the rules of everybody but then like the romans you find
00:39:20.400 yourself with nothing particular to you hey i i was touched by your description of rishi sunak
00:39:29.300 because i think he besides some of his manners he exudes the you know the british sense of fair
00:39:37.120 play and like he has a gentleman he's a gentleman he really is and you know he's hindu which is
00:39:45.480 obviously different than christianity but not necessarily antagonistic to it and you know i
00:39:52.300 i think frankly the color of his skin is is not just irrelevant but invisible when you when you
00:39:58.680 think of who Rishi Sunak is. He had other problems, but I don't know if that's the demographic
00:40:03.840 trajectory of the UK. Let me play for you a little video that was rolled out by a group of Muslim 1.00
00:40:10.640 activists in Birmingham in advance of John Cleese attending there the other day. John Cleese being,
00:40:17.640 of course, the comedian with Monty Python, and he's recently become a critic of Islam online.
00:40:24.180 And let me show you, Professor, I put it to you that rather than the genteel Rishi Sunak,
00:40:31.300 the demographic future, if the UK continues on its current path, is a little bit more like these guys.
00:40:36.540 Take a look.
00:40:37.340 John Cleese, we heard that you're coming to Birmingham Town Hall to perform this so-called comedy show.
00:40:42.360 For years, you've used your platforms to attack Islam, spreading dangerous misinformation and creating hostility towards Muslims. 0.96
00:40:50.520 I'm saying things like Islam's all about killing. 0.97
00:40:53.280 This isn't comedy. 1.00
00:40:54.180 That's hate speech and you're just a hate preacher. 0.98
00:40:56.800 And let's call out the hypocrisy, free speech has become a convenient shield for anti-muslim 0.97
00:41:02.340 hostility and vilification with no consequences.
00:41:06.120 The moment that anyone uses that same free speech to attack other faiths relentlessly
00:41:10.900 like Judaism, they are called out, labelled anti-semitic and exposed across national media.
00:41:16.420 And when the target is Islam, suddenly it's just all satire.
00:41:20.880 speech in this country is applied selectively. It only seems to extend to the groups that 0.88
00:41:26.320 elites deem acceptable to vilify in order to meet their agenda. And to the Birmingham
00:41:32.080 Town Hall for hosting a so-called comedian that actively promotes prejudice against a
00:41:38.080 major segment of Birmingham's community which undermines public trust and local cohesion.
00:41:44.000 We ask the Birmingham Town Hall align with the duty of community respect and cancel the show.
00:41:49.040 Now, in the end, they were not successful, which surprised me because this same group was the pressure group that had the Tel Aviv Makabe football team banned from bringing any of its fans. 0.99
00:42:02.240 I mean, the Muslim population. 0.52
00:42:03.740 Remember the fate of the police officer who actually did that. 1.00
00:42:09.240 It was all exposed to be done fraudulently on the basis of lies.
00:42:13.400 And so I think the local power groups will be well aware of this fact.
00:42:20.220 But, I mean, let's just look at what we saw there.
00:42:23.200 We saw people deliberately designed to look threatening.
00:42:27.320 They are dressed in black.
00:42:29.400 There is a kind of pounding rhythm about the whole thing.
00:42:33.960 There is an essential sense of we have power.
00:42:41.300 We're not going to talk about violence, but you will realize it's actually there, that we have the power, maybe physically, but at the moment, we've got the power to cancel you, to deprive you of your living.
00:42:58.040 Of course, if you're a comedian and you can't actually perform,
00:43:01.860 like John Cleese who had an awful lot of wives, which is terribly expensive indulgence.
00:43:07.480 And even at his age, you need to keep on performing, destroy your livelihood. 0.97
00:43:12.020 I think it is, again, this notion that Islam demands special treatment.
00:43:19.140 Now, the question of attacks on Jews,
00:43:24.220 And it is the question of are they actually, are Jews actually literally being attacked?
00:43:32.040 The charge of anti-Semitism, of course, has this immense power because of the Second World War, because of Nazism and the Holocaust. 0.87
00:43:43.280 course but there's a kind of again it's very strange there's a sort of penis envy of we want 0.78
00:43:50.740 to as it were have exactly the same whites as you Jews against again one of the reasons why in Gaza 0.84
00:43:58.020 you were constantly talking about the events there as a genocide manifestly they are not the
00:44:04.360 population of Gaza has actually increased during the war not actually fallen whereas if you actually
00:44:11.080 look at the population of Jews, say, in Poland in the Second World War, there's a catastrophic
00:44:17.780 90% loss of the population. 0.69
00:44:20.640 So that's a genuine genocide.
00:44:22.860 I think that, what does that video show? 0.64
00:44:27.880 It shows that there is a risk of what I call, and what others call, Northern Ireland-ization.
00:44:35.800 Northern Ireland, of course, has been divided,
00:44:38.200 because of unfortunate history,
00:44:40.920 into essentially two warring groups,
00:44:44.120 particularly amongst the working class.
00:44:46.760 The Irish Nationalists, and their flag of the Tip-on-Earth,
00:44:50.960 and the Ulster Unionists, the Protestants, the Probs,
00:44:54.460 famously with the Union Jack.
00:44:56.760 If you go now to Belfast, I have many friends there,
00:45:00.600 and become a reasonably frequent visitor,
00:45:02.940 You'll actually see a strange combination, Ezra.
00:45:07.040 Guess which flag flies now alongside the Irish tricolor?
00:45:12.980 I've been to Ireland so many times, not to Northern Ireland, but to the Republic of Ireland.
00:45:18.660 And there are so many Palestinian flags in the Republic of Ireland.
00:45:23.380 Exactly.
00:45:23.680 Exactly.
00:45:24.460 So alongside the Palestinian flag, sorry, alongside the Irish tricolor, you will see the Palestinian flag.
00:45:31.640 And alongside the Union Jack, you will see the Star of Israel. And the risk that's happening in Britain, again, look at how those men were dressed.
00:45:45.000 Last weekend and the weekend before in Portsmouth, a man called Danny Tomo, Daniel Thomas, organized a group of people called the Patriot Platform to resist immigration, to resist particularly the landing of an unusually large, one of these inflatable class, 0.54
00:46:12.260 but carrying a hundred and a lot of people, a huge, huge thing,
00:46:15.720 taking an unusual route across the Channel,
00:46:19.220 sailing from Normandy, the actual beaches,
00:46:21.540 you know, the literal beaches,
00:46:23.460 consecrated by the D-Day landings across to Portsmouth.
00:46:27.380 And do you know what? 1.00
00:46:29.180 They were white, but they looked exactly like those Muslims. 1.00
00:46:33.160 They were dressed in black, and they were actually wearing face masks. 0.97
00:46:36.840 And there is a risk of, I'm afraid, two or more rival groups as society fragments into rival, semi-militarized vigilante.
00:46:51.060 And this is a very, very real risk.
00:46:53.980 But it's not surprising, Ezra, because what have we done?
00:46:58.060 And we have used the language to Muslims of they are a community.
00:47:03.320 They have community leaders.
00:47:06.200 You may remember back, because, again, you are well informed on Britain, back at the time of the Southport riots, which, of course, were protesting against immigrants and immigrant violence violently.
00:47:24.840 And there were counter protests, particularly when moving again to Birmingham, Birmingham Sparkbrook.
00:47:31.100 And in Birmingham, Sparkbrook, a particular pub that allegedly, well, it was occupied by some of the white protesters, was surrounded by a very well-organized gang of Muslims wearing masks and carrying baseball bats.
00:47:51.420 And somebody was beaten up so badly that his liver was ruptured.
00:47:55.680 What then happened? 0.98
00:47:57.100 they were addressed by a Muslim police inspector
00:48:02.340 because there is, of course, a group within the police
00:48:07.180 called the Muslim Police Officers Association.
00:48:10.800 And what did he say to them?
00:48:12.960 Lads, come on, be sensible.
00:48:17.060 I can't do a Birmingham accent.
00:48:18.420 Come on, be sensible.
00:48:20.640 Put your baseball bats away.
00:48:22.640 Put them in the moss.
00:48:24.480 and if you disperse now
00:48:28.800 we'll forget about it
00:48:30.820 now imagine doing that
00:48:33.220 to the Patriot platform
00:48:37.140 can you imagine Ezra
00:48:38.500 because it's always good to turn a joke
00:48:41.000 can you imagine a member of the white police officers
00:48:45.000 saying to them
00:48:48.620 presumably in a rather posh accent 1.00
00:48:50.740 now come on chaps 1.00
00:48:52.240 don't be like this 1.00
00:48:53.720 Put your base backs away in the vestry of the church.
00:48:58.260 Do not disturb the copes and be especially careful of the processional cross.
00:49:03.440 But you see, there is a risk that that will happen.
00:49:09.340 Because if the other is allowed to happen, and also there's something else which is even more important, Ezra.
00:49:14.620 The law actually specifically protects religious minorities.
00:49:19.740 In the same way that it specifically protects the transgendered, it specifically protects people of color, it specifically protects women, it protects anybody but a white man.
00:49:34.540 And again, it goes even further than that. It protects, again deliberately, the mentally sick. It protects the gypsy. These terrible cases involving people like Ruda Cabana and Calocane, who in a sensible world, once it became clear that they were violent, either sociopaths or whatever else they were, from early teens, would have been incarcerated in a mental hospital for life. 0.96
00:50:03.620 But, oh, no, they have special rights.
00:50:07.240 And again, it's the problem of the rights culture.
00:50:11.020 The man who did more to shape it worldwide, apart from Simply Britain, a man called Tom Bingham,
00:50:17.660 in the essay that he wrote on the rule of law and the very notable lecture he gave on it, again, Commonwealth in Australia,
00:50:27.360 he actually formulates this completely clearly.
00:50:30.100 He says human rights law is anti-democratic.
00:50:35.180 It's counter-majoritarian.
00:50:37.300 It protects the minority at the expense of the majority. 0.87
00:50:41.060 And he lists the minorities, beginning with the mentally sick, the gypsy, the illegal immigrant, you know, you name it. 1.00
00:50:48.140 That's where we are.
00:50:49.580 In other words, what we're dealing with isn't simply hyper-liberalism. 0.98
00:50:54.840 It's not just silly women getting excited and whatever. 0.75
00:50:58.020 the law has been deliberately changed and people don't understand this i mean one of the reasons
00:51:04.980 that there is such a sense of bewilderment who would have thought that the law of england which
00:51:10.820 you know invented the idea of equality before law had actually been deliberately skewed yeah
00:51:17.400 doctor you've been so generous with your time i've learned so much i i want to put one personal
00:51:23.700 question before you go i uh in my own amateur way i've become a bit of an anglophile even though i
00:51:30.200 am now banned from your country um i am suing the home office and i'll keep you posted on how that
00:51:38.280 goes um and i've discovered uh rudyard kipling and i've gone i've read as much as i couldn't he
00:51:46.400 actually visited canada and had some very interesting things to say including about the
00:51:50.580 City of Medicine Hat, which I won't get into that now, but there's two poems that I think about
00:51:57.360 quite a lot when I think of these issues. One is called When the English Learned to Hate,
00:52:02.740 and the other is called The Stranger Within My Gate, and I'm sure you know both of them.
00:52:07.300 And even a hundred years ago, you could feel that he was lamenting these changes.
00:52:12.880 What are your thoughts on Kipling? Do you regard him as, how do you regard him? Is he an important
00:52:20.140 political poet is he is it too uh jingoistic what are your thoughts on kipling uh i think
00:52:28.680 when the english begin to hate is actually gk chestnut but uh i think but never mind um i think
00:52:36.320 these these figures i mean kipling kipling is an a man of x who is quite extraordinary of course
00:52:43.160 profoundly immersed in the culture of India,
00:52:49.220 where he spent so much of his time.
00:52:51.380 I think a very, very great poet,
00:52:54.440 a man tormented, of course, by the later stuff,
00:52:59.260 and is a product of the torment of the loss of his only son
00:53:02.880 in the First World War, like so many other people.
00:53:06.580 Chesterton is a different matter.
00:53:08.640 Chesterton's much more bombastic.
00:53:11.520 Chesterton is a powerful Roman Catholic voice,
00:53:16.940 one that regards English modernity as a disaster, which I don't.
00:53:23.040 But they are voices that have acquired a fresh meaning, again, as time has rolled on.
00:53:32.280 In the same way, again, a poet that I find myself,
00:53:36.580 I was influenced by profoundly when I was a schoolboy,
00:53:40.520 and performing in, he wrote plays in poetry, T.S. Eliot.
00:53:45.940 And even for me as a schoolboy, one of the great lines in Murder at the Cathedral,
00:53:54.720 mankind cannot stand too much reality, stuck in my head.
00:54:00.440 And I'm afraid we're in a world in which, Ezra, reality is catching up with us.
00:54:05.280 And it will be very painful.
00:54:07.420 we've lived in comfortable times and those i've no idea when you were born i was born in 1945
00:54:15.560 i have lived through the most comfortable experience of human history but it is manifestly
00:54:23.520 coming to an end and we have moved from comfortable times into what the chinese call
00:54:30.720 interesting times, meaning 1.00
00:54:32.760 it gives them a curse. And I'm afraid
00:54:35.020 we are. I thought
00:54:37.120 it wouldn't come as quick as it did.
00:54:39.000 It's come extraordinarily quick.
00:54:41.320 The sense of disintegration
00:54:43.720 in the
00:54:45.260 20th century from
00:54:46.680 roughly 2010
00:54:49.300 is quite extraordinary,
00:54:51.300 compounded with the revolution
00:54:53.420 of social media and everything
00:54:55.400 else. But you know what?
00:54:58.320 Finally,
00:54:59.160 finally,
00:55:00.720 You have to cling on to what all the three people we've mentioned, the possibility of language, the possibility of understanding, the possibility of persuading.
00:55:15.280 And it was very easy for all of us, you know, you to accept your banning from Britain, me to have accepted the cancellation of 2020.
00:55:26.660 But I believe, and I think all three of those people in their very different ways, Kipling, Chesterton, and even the very mild-mannered T.S. Eliot, they believed in one essential thing, which was courage, which they showed in very different ways.
00:55:44.920 And that seems to me to be the essential one.
00:55:48.020 The only thing, the only public virtue that acts, there are lots of public virtues.
00:55:53.100 There's reason, there's eloquence, there's good intention, there's an awareness of the kind of good and all the rest of it.
00:56:00.020 But none of them really get persuasiveness, but none of them matter unless they're coupled with courage.
00:56:07.000 And as the world collapses round us, let's shake hands on a bit of courage.
00:56:13.060 Dr. David Starkey, what a pleasure and an honor to spend the last hour with you.
00:56:16.980 And you are a man who shows great courage.
00:56:20.400 And I hope our viewers will be inspired by you.
00:56:23.080 Thank you, my friend.
00:56:23.880 And I look forward to greeting you again in the United Kingdom one day.
00:56:28.880 Indeed.
00:56:29.560 And maybe even meeting on the airwaves again.
00:56:32.560 It's been a great day.
00:56:33.560 Thank you.
00:56:34.260 Thanks, Doctor.
00:56:34.780 There he is, Dr. David Starkey.
00:56:36.660 Well, that's our show for the day.
00:56:38.540 Until next time, on behalf of all of us here at Rebel World Headquarters,
00:56:41.920 to you at home, good night, and keep fighting for freedom.