00:13:57.940I was going to say, Natalie Winters posted a great comment on Twitter showing a clip of Fauci.
00:14:03.520it was like a year or two ago where he said i will absolutely come on and meet with congress and i
00:14:09.380will testify i have nothing to hide i'm happy to do it as soon as they ask me i'm going to go out
00:14:13.220there and i'll talk to congress whatever they want i'll answer any questions yeah how did that turn
00:14:17.980out well he answered them with i have listened to my lawyers and i'm standing behind the fifth
00:14:24.180amendment and i won't ask her answer any of your questions there was there was that was a terrible
00:14:29.240accent, by the way. No, that was awful. We're going to move past that. Real quick, I had previously
00:14:34.440mentioned that I wasn't sure if he was a mad scientist or just a sad little guy who wanted
00:14:37.920attention, and I forgot that we have a clip that I want to play right now where he was being
00:14:45.000questioned, and I forget the lady's name who was questioning him, pointed out that he used
00:14:49.480taxpayer dollars to send transgenic mice that contained the body parts of aborted five-month-old
00:14:54.560babies to China, jokingly calling it a BLT sandwich. Can we play that? We have learned
00:15:00.180that U.S. coronavirus researchers at UNC shipped, quote, humanized or transgenic mice to China by
00:15:08.240around 2017 for use in their dangerous coronavirus work. Under your NIAID coronavirus, researchers
00:15:17.220also used aborted baby body parts in mice research, and taxpayers paid for them to do
00:15:26.800that. NIH-funded coronavirus researcher Dr. Ralph Baric and his colleagues at UNC put
00:15:34.980parts of livers, thymuses, and chunks of human fetal lung that they got from aborted, almost
00:15:43.100five-month-old human babies they put those parts in their research mice they disgustingly named
00:15:51.840them blt l mice and wrote they had created a quote sandwich of aborted body parts in the mice
00:16:01.700get it folks blt a blt sandwich matt what's your thought on all this so so here's my take0.59
00:16:11.860All right. All right. Here's my take. I'm way more satisfied than Pearson because there was a moment in this country where more important than who you voted for, what political party you were a member of, more important than your religion, more important than your favorite sports team was where you stood on Dr. Anthony Fauci.
00:16:34.820This question divided people at workplaces, it divided people in families, it divided churches
00:16:43.920themselves. This was a threshold question ripping the country apart. Now, Pearson Sharp and Matt
00:16:51.280Gates and probably David Pollock were on the side of skeptic of all of this and asking questions
00:16:58.760about the lockdowns, the deprivation of rights, and the empowerment of a universe of tens of
00:17:05.340thousands of Fauci's that were all of a sudden emerging in city manager's offices and at the
00:17:11.800public county health department. These people seized power. We never knew. I always thought
00:17:17.300these were the good people, but we saw so many of them seize any power they could to force us
00:17:22.560behind unproven masks and to make us show cards about our personal medical information,
00:17:27.880just to get inside of buildings. They made us sit outside of perfectly good restaurants
00:17:34.380and eat our meals next to the gutters in our communities. They did all of this. People got
00:17:41.900addicted to drugs. People lost their homes. People became homeless. People turned in their dogs and
00:17:48.540animals at an alarming rate because they couldn't afford to keep them without jobs anymore. And all
00:17:53.380of it was driven by the trust that was just reposed in this man by far too many people.
00:18:00.300And the fact that that got ripped open to me instills a little bit of deterrence into
00:18:07.580the power infrastructure and into the information space that if you are so egotistical that
00:18:13.360in a moment of dread or concern or crisis, you seize power and destroy people's lives
00:18:19.960that you will be exposed for it as he was today.
00:18:23.380Well, but you hope that it's going to be covered that way in the media, because, again, the reality of what's really happening and what the media tells you is the disconnect that we have with the general population.
00:18:33.560They're probably only going to see segments of this because, of course, they were working today when the hearing was happening.
00:18:38.000So they're going to see the clips on the news. And what do you think CNN is going to show the people?
00:18:42.060Do you think CNN is going to show the people that they lied to the American people alongside Anthony Fauci?
00:18:47.660And so that's what's so important. Hopefully people are watching this podcast and watching OAN so they can get the truth.
00:18:51.920But the reality is these lies that we're told, these lies that are horrible politicians stood behind when they took down your basketball nets and told you you couldn't get in the sun.
00:19:02.140I hope the people get to see this testimony and not the Democrat talking points where they were honoring Fauci for being so brave to step forward.
00:20:48.980And all the people who hid in their homes and wore their masks like good little soldiers, well, they didn't want him out on his paddleboard because how dare you go and put our lives at risk while we're locked inside.0.66
00:20:59.940It was the perfect, I mean, literally the perfect communist playbook playing out in real time with the Nazi playbook, what we're willing to take from you and what you're willing to accept.0.60
00:21:10.060And then once you're accepting all of the pain and misery, how you're willing to lash out on your fellow man because they weren't willing to suffer like you.0.80
00:21:18.100Oh, man, it never would have played out more perfectly than this.
00:23:27.820And we found out that hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, which you can get using Matt 10 and All Family Pharmacy, those were proven to be effective treatments for COVID.0.97
00:23:38.220Anthony Fauci wrote in his stupid little diary, which I believe, by the way, had My Little Pony on the front,0.99
00:23:43.060one of them stupid little locks that easily could have been picked.1.00
00:23:45.460But we know it all was true that you could have been treated with those,1.00
00:23:49.020and instead they gave you that rendesive mirror or whatever that they said when death is near,
00:23:52.840and they put it, then intubated you, and then CNN would run out there with the death counter and say,
00:23:56.840see how deadly this is? Stay home. God, what a scam. What a scam.
00:24:28.900Big corporations like Amazon and Facebook and all of those others are going to say, you want to work for us, you get vaccinated.0.98
00:24:37.440And it's been proven that when you make it difficult for people in their lives, they lose their ideological bullshit and they get vaccinated.0.96
00:24:59.280And that's not what I was referring to.
00:25:00.960Well, that's exactly what you meant when you said making it hard for people to live without getting a vaccination.
00:25:06.880You affected people's ability to work, travel, be educated, to actually flourish in American science, to self-determine as we're all given God-given rights.
00:30:30.740they tortured our children and they tortured us through our children there is no vindication
00:30:36.320anthony fauci is an evil person every politician that followed his guidance knowing that it was
00:30:42.400false is an evil person and and he may not go to jail but we will never forget what they did to us
00:30:48.520and that's why we talking about this today that's why i talk about on my show this can never happen
00:30:52.520to america ever again amen amen yeah that's great um that actually segues probably into
00:31:00.720a great clip of bernie moreno let's do it yeah can we play the bernie moreno clip because i think
00:31:06.440that expresses how we're all feeling yeah it was about six years ago today that i decided
00:31:11.880i'm going to give up my businesses sell them all run for office run through the united states
00:31:18.040senate here i am sitting in front of you six years later saying who the do you think you
00:31:23.020were for doing that there is no defense of what you did you may have had a 50 plus year
00:31:31.720legacy of public service but it ends in total and complete disgrace yeah and it should we'll put him
00:31:42.580down as a maybe and i want to we've been going on for this for a while but there's so much here to
00:31:48.240talk about um and i want to i want to go deeper on on fauci because this isn't new yeah what we're
00:31:57.400seeing today what happened in 2020 has been going on for decades this guy is evil and there's a
00:32:06.700there's a time that a lot of people have forgotten about back in the 80s and 90s when he was actually
00:32:13.280the director of the office of aids which sounds like an amazing place to work
00:32:20.400and he he ran experiments on orphan children not just orphan children orphan black children
00:32:28.460other other minorities as well but that was no way pearson yes absolutely he ran experiments
00:32:34.560the drugs were given to children most of them were black or other minorities without their consent
00:32:41.680without proper protocols without having independent monitors to watch over the children and all of
00:32:48.240this was in violation of the law all of it it was illegal and they ran these tests on these kids
00:32:54.200and a lot of them they used drugs that they knew had deadly side effects and a lot of these kids
00:33:00.580died or ended up having horrible side effects that that persisted for years i did a i did a
00:33:07.280special on this and we're going to try and run it again um maybe this weekend
00:33:11.140this guy is is is a psychopath and he did he killed kids for his his own experiments and it
00:33:20.760wasn't just kids after that he went on to torture dogs you know there was the whole the whole beagle0.98
00:33:25.860experimentation and they picked beagles specifically because they're a very kind
00:33:29.480and forgiving breed who don't bite their handlers so this guy locked beagles up in cages and had
00:33:36.040them tormented with sand fleas that bit them until they bled he he cut them open while they
00:33:41.380were alive just to see what would happen like this this guy is a monster now he pure and simple he's0.90
00:33:46.460a monster and he's been doing this for decades so whether or not he has a presidential party
00:33:52.200there's got to be a way to put this guy behind bars there there has to be there there could be
00:33:56.920no justice while he walks free. Well, Pearson, I think the most likely outcome there would be
00:34:09.720some state attorney general under some long arm statute, some fraud, some misstatement,
00:34:17.620some, you know, purposeful abuse of power statute. You know, those have been very challenging to
00:34:23.900maintain convictions on lately. The Supreme Court has thrown out convictions under the honest
00:34:29.860services doctrine that had wrapped up a lot of people in power who had abused that power
00:34:35.640for financial gain or other reason. And so you really have to look also at a narrow window of
00:34:42.440time. David did a really good job explaining it earlier. It's worth coming back to. If what you
00:34:47.460care most about is when, you know, the criminal justice process and all of its glory comes for
00:34:53.260Dr. Fauci, you have to look at what the pardon covered, when it covered it, and then ultimately
00:34:59.140the big question about whether the pardon is legal at all.
00:35:02.460President Trump has himself sent the signal that he's got doubts as to the legitimacy
00:35:07.040of that pardon, and we'll see how the Department of Justice reviews it.
00:35:11.520But when you look at Fauci's congressional testimony, then his own notations in documents,
00:35:19.880And then how he was covering up for Peter Daszak and the EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan lab, it looks like elements of a conspiracy that would be very interesting for a prosecutor to review.
00:35:34.720And I think that's the right frame and context.
00:35:37.880One interesting thing I remembered I wanted to mention is that there were several senior scientists in 2020 who were working with Fauci in 2021, very close to him. And his emails previously revealed this. This didn't just come out, but I think a lot of people have forgotten about it.
00:35:52.640And these senior scientists, I think there was like 10 or 11 of them. And in their private emails, they all told him, you know, we think this was manmade. This came from a lab. We think it was leaked from the lab. And we think we need to, you know, discuss this or, you know, bring more light to this.
00:36:09.980and Fauci called for a meeting with these people
00:36:14.180and they went together and all the scientists,
00:36:16.580they had a meeting with him, a private meeting.
00:36:18.940And I think it was like the next day or after that,
00:39:20.080And maybe it is at a state level. I don't know.
00:39:21.840But if nobody's above the law, that means nobody's above the law, and that means people can look.
00:39:26.440There was an interesting theory that all of this was, and I think there's credible theory to that, all of this was actually about the election in 2020.
00:39:44.760I wonder so often whether Donald Trump was so good at politics that they literally had to figure out a way to change the rules at the last minute so he wouldn't win because he was definitely going to win.
00:39:59.140But for covid, there's no question about that.
00:40:01.580So Biden would have been exposed and Trump draws energy from the crowd.
00:40:07.240That's his whole shtick as a as a public servant populist.
00:40:11.240So the idea was that, you know, Fauci was going to be in the middle of this and help facilitate this shift to mail-in ballots so that they could steal the election.
00:40:22.040And that there was no intention to kill all these people.
00:40:33.840It does seem very likely. And there's actually a great clip, phenomenal clip of George freaking
00:40:40.600Soros in February of 2019, I think, coming out and saying, right, it was February of 2020. Anyway,
00:40:50.740it was very early. It was before it happened, but right before it happened, saying something
00:40:56.040incredible needs to happen to shake up this election. Otherwise, Trump's going to win.
00:40:59.760And maybe that's a pandemic, or maybe it is global violence, or something, you know, a riot or something like that. But we have to do something to shake this up and change the election. Immediately after we have COVID. And then three or four months after that, we have George Floyd and the Summer of Love. So I think very clearly, this was engineered.
00:41:22.860I think there's so many angles to this, though, and I don't disagree with what you're saying, but I think I don't think we could put it all together in one big chunk of one giant master plan. I don't think anybody in this government is that smart. But I do believe people are smart separately to take advantage of a crisis.
00:41:38.640And I believe Democrats saw the opportunity, and I believe their friends in the fake news saw an opportunity to utilize the hysteria to put in place these mail-in ballots that, by the way, have been going on a long time.
00:41:51.280But the use of them have always favored Democrats, and they saw an opportunity to massively expand exactly the use of mail-in ballots.
00:41:58.220And proof of that is look at the objection that they have to the Save America Act.
00:42:01.80080-plus percent of Americans have no problem with voter ID, proof of citizenship to vote, and then reigning or regulating mail-in ballots.
00:42:09.740Most Americans don't care if you have to prove that you should be an actual voter before you get a mail-in ballot.
00:42:15.280However, the Democrats are fighting it because they know they'll lose.
00:42:18.340So I do think the Democrats took an opportunity with the pandemic to push out these mail-in ballots.
00:42:23.980But also Republicans did too, by the way.
00:42:25.780Republican secretaries of state, they were doing the mail-in ballot game too.
00:42:29.840And it wasn't until I think it was last election, election before, that they finally stopped automatically mailing ballots.
00:42:34.920Everybody was like, let's get everybody a ballot.
00:42:52.820And I think it was just a combination of government saw an opportunity to take the rising spread of populism around the world and slap people back in their homes and tell them, well, you don't have as much control of the government as you think.
00:43:03.280So I think it was an all-encompassing opportunity that a lot of people took.
00:43:09.900And so as far as the origin and what the nefarious plan was, whether it was a nefarious plan, whether it was a leak of technology in the lab, we'll never know.
00:43:19.260But I do know that people took advantage of this, and Dr. Fauci didn't tell the truth.
00:43:27.840I think that the road to accountability can be a long and a slow one.
00:43:32.920I think this was a step in the right direction.
00:43:35.640I was elated to see Fauci, when cornered, offering no defense of that which he had done,
00:43:43.340Because it gives us a chance when the next time the country almost comes unglued, maybe those of us who were asking questions will have a little more credibility with our friends, our family, our loved ones, our co-workers, and there'll be a stronger sense of resistance going forward if they ever try it again.
00:47:04.660Of course, everyone has their opportunity at due process
00:47:07.440before Pearson convicts them in a monologue.
00:47:09.440but uh but but Pearson you think this is a setup in what way I'm not understanding
00:47:16.840I don't think it was a setup I don't think you say these folks are running I don't think that
00:47:21.120they they were running an operation I think this all happened organically but I think as in many
00:47:27.560cases yeah what was what was it the guy who stabbed the the black guy who stabbed Irena
00:47:33.800Zaruska on the they said he wasn't mentally competent to stand trial and that they've
00:47:38.440use that for so many of these cases. Whenever somebody stabs, a black guy stabs or attacks a0.96
00:47:43.880white person, well, he's not mentally competent to stand trial. So they give them mental incompetence1.00
00:47:50.120to excuse their behavior. They do that all the time. So I think that's probably what happened
00:47:56.060here. But regardless, I mean, you shouldn't use that word against an eight-year-old kid,
00:48:00.520but I understand the outrage and the anger at looking over and seeing someone rifling through
00:48:05.640your belongings your child's belongings and being upset about that what was the charge he was she
00:48:10.180was convicted on one in the case criminal mission it was something yeah disorderly conduct disorderly
00:48:14.040conduct it was disorderly conduct right so so the question is legally speaking yeah is it disorderly
00:48:19.820conduct to yell the n-word and an eight-year-old child so the jury said that kind of strikes me as
00:48:25.620the definition of disorderly well they use it under a fighting words legal rationale and the
00:48:30.800Rationale assumes that certain forms of speech are tantamount to violence because they will certainly result in violence, which in this case, they did not.
00:49:42.740But I don't think this is necessarily the First Amendment case we want it to be, but it's still a really crazy case.
00:49:51.460So there's a couple other facts that I think need to be presented here.
00:49:54.640So let me draw a fine point on that, David. Do you believe that someone has a First Amendment right to go yell the N-word at a child in a public park?
00:50:06.020It depends. Like everything with the First Amendment, it all depends. Because if that child was affected in some way by that language, it's an interesting legal question.
00:50:16.880Because if the child was traumatized from it, maybe it's a civil case, maybe not a criminal one.
00:50:21.060It would all depend on the facts surrounding the use of that word, and even if it was that word a different word, like even if she made threatening gestures to the kid and he reacted a certain way, there could be instances where certain speech can trigger crimes or civil liability.
00:50:33.960In this instance, I don't think that situation – again, I haven't seen the whole video – warranted a crime in that instance, and the jury agreed with that.
00:50:46.780What would be qualifying under my fighting words doctrine?
00:50:50.740Well, to all the dads involved in making this program, David Pollack, Pearson Sharp, myself, our director, just like think about yourself in a park and somebody comes up and starts yelling at your child.
00:51:05.440How aggressive and racist and threatening do those yells have to be before you knock them in the face just out of pure instinct?
00:51:14.740I would say the fighting word threshold for Pearson Sharp would be shockingly low.
00:51:21.840But I think in that instance, if she yelled at the child regardless of what came out of her mouth – and let me be very clear.
00:51:27.360I am 1,000 percent appalled by this.0.85