The Ben Shapiro Show - October 21, 2026


A Pollster Got Caught Faking the Data — and the NYT Ran With It 15 Times.

Hosted by
Mentioned
Dancing With the Stars' Just Lost Its Mind

Episode Stats


Length

32 minutes

Words per minute

186.17

Word count

6,125

Sentence count

515


Transcript

Transcripts from "The Ben Shapiro Show" are sourced from the Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool. Explore them interactively here.
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 So, speaking of these campaigns, one of the big narrative ops that is happening right now is this idea that Democrats are running away with this thing.
00:00:07.000 Every single headline is Democrat tsunami, Democrat tsunami.
00:00:11.000 You can see it.
00:00:11.000 It's a Democrat tsunami.
00:00:13.000 Okay.
00:00:13.000 So, here is the thing.
00:00:14.000 It absolutely is not.
00:00:16.000 It absolutely 100% is not.
00:00:18.000 Not only is it not a Democrat tsunami, every major Senate seat right now is a dead heat.
00:00:26.000 It is a dead heat.
00:00:27.000 We got to talk about the polling here because, again, there's lots of focus on the polling.
00:00:31.000 I myself cite polling an awful lot because Again, data is data, but you actually don't have to read the data.
00:00:37.000 And so let's start off with what the polling says, and then we'll talk about the garbage in, garbage out problem.
00:00:41.000 Basically, there are three problems when it comes to polling.
00:00:44.000 Okay, one, you could have a bad poll with a bad design.
00:00:47.000 The way that pollsters actually do polls is they try to figure out exactly what the mix of voters is going to be, and there are a bunch of assumptions baked into the cake.
00:00:54.000 So if you think there's going to be heavy black turnout, you oversample black voters, or you adjust for the black population in your voting poll to adjust for the general population of the voting pool.
00:01:05.000 That's how you do these polls.
00:01:06.000 You have to have a model of what the voter turnout is going to look like.
00:01:09.000 And then you backfill your poll results from each particular group into that poll.
00:01:14.000 So you can be totally off based on that.
00:01:16.000 So number one, you can have polling misses.
00:01:18.000 Number two, humans don't know how to read polls.
00:01:21.000 So just to give you a quick example, let's say that you have a 4844 poll in favor of a particular candidate and it says margin of error four points.
00:01:31.000 And what does that mean?
00:01:32.000 Now, most people think that means, well, probably The race is fairly close, but not super close.
00:01:37.000 Margin of error four.
00:01:38.000 It's a four point race.
00:01:40.000 Or let's take one that's even better.
00:01:41.000 Okay.
00:01:42.000 48 42.
00:01:42.000 You see a 48 42 number, you're figuring, and that is a blowout in favor of the 48 candidate against the 42 candidate.
00:01:48.000 Let's say that same race has a margin of error of four.
00:01:53.000 That same poll is a margin of error of four.
00:01:54.000 The way you need to read that poll is that it could be four points off in any direction, meaning that 48 42 race could actually be a 46 44 lead.
00:02:06.000 For the candidate who's down 48 42.
00:02:09.000 It could be a 52 38 lead for the candidate who is up 48 42.
00:02:16.000 Right?
00:02:17.000 Because you can add or subtract four points from either side.
00:02:20.000 And because it's a binary race, that's how polling error works.
00:02:22.000 That's how the margin of error works.
00:02:25.000 So you got to be able to read polls.
00:02:28.000 And right now, again, the narrative is being built on people being unable to read polls.
00:02:33.000 Who's going to give you the latest polling data from the Real Clear Politics polling average?
00:02:38.000 Again, don't fall for the demoralization campaign.
00:02:40.000 You're hearing it from the horseshoe right.
00:02:42.000 You're hearing it from the left.
00:02:42.000 You're hearing it from the legacy media, but I repeat myself.
00:02:46.000 Here are the current real clear politics polling averages.
00:02:49.000 In Texas, Tallarico, plus 2.2.
00:02:51.000 In Michigan, El Sayed, plus 2.
00:02:53.000 In Iowa, Republican Ashley Hinson, plus 0.1.
00:02:56.000 In Maine, Jackson, plus 1.6.
00:02:58.000 In Alaska, Mary Peltola, plus 1.2.
00:03:01.000 So theoretically, Democrats are up in four of those five states.
00:03:04.000 There is only one problem.
00:03:06.000 Every single one of those races is a dead heat.
00:03:09.000 That is a dead heat.
00:03:10.000 If you pretend otherwise, you don't know how to read poll data.
00:03:14.000 You don't.
00:03:15.000 Talarico is not up plus 2.2.
00:03:17.000 He could be up four.
00:03:19.000 He could be down.
00:03:21.000 That, that's just the way to read margin of error.
00:03:21.000 Right?
00:03:24.000 Now, as you aggregate polls, the margin of error goes down because your sample size is going up, right?
00:03:30.000 The number of people who are polled in an average of polls is larger than any individual poll.
00:03:35.000 And so your margin of error, meaning like the amount that it could be wrong, goes down and shrinks.
00:03:40.000 But bottom line is that if a race is within two points inside the Real clear politics polling average, which is in three.
00:03:47.000 That needs to be treated as a dead heat.
00:03:50.000 That would not mean the polling is wrong.
00:03:51.000 It means you don't know how to read a poll.
00:03:53.000 And then finally, you get to the problem of the day.
00:03:56.000 And the problem of the day right now is garbage in, garbage out.
00:03:59.000 So there's an unbelievable story that is now breaking about the garbage that is polling in some areas.
00:04:08.000 So there is a fake pollster called Wedgwood Polls 50 plus one, which is the sort of revision of Nate Silver's 538 over at the New York Times.
00:04:18.000 They report Last week, we received a credible tip from a trusted source that Wedgwood Polls might be faking data.
00:04:25.000 We had received tips about Wedgwood in the past, but this particular tip had something crucial that others didn't.
00:04:29.000 Evidence.
00:04:31.000 So 50 plus one investigated by running an identical poll to Wedgwood's back end data, and they uncovered a bunch of red flags, including unnaturally clean sample data that lined up perfectly with Mississippi demographics, impossible user IDs, scrambled timestamps, and outdated serial numbers.
00:04:45.000 So 50 plus one reached out to Wedgwood polls.
00:04:48.000 They said, quote, we reached out to them to ask who they were and confirm the methodology statement on their website.
00:04:53.000 We were given two names, Jack Sims and Andrew Prater.
00:04:56.000 We were able to independently confirm that Sims had previous experience in the polling industry and reviewed their methodology statement in detail.
00:05:02.000 It is not atypical for a pollster to leave an existing firm, form their own, and self fund some surveys to build a reputation.
00:05:08.000 We had no reason at the time to believe this case was any different.
00:05:10.000 Wedgwood operated as if it were a legitimate polling firm, including collecting money from donors to conduct crowd funded polls and sharing raw data survey with 50 Plus One on October 15th, 2026.
00:05:23.000 Well, a few days later, 50 Plus One reached out to Wedgwood with a request for comment on an investigation we had conducted into their alleged survey research.
00:05:30.000 They did not respond to our request, but instead posted a public statement on social media admitting they had been fabricating data.
00:05:37.000 They also reached out directly in social media DMs minutes before publishing their memo with an official comment F you, plus the name of an individual not affiliated with 50 plus one.
00:05:48.000 Here is the screenshot of Wedgwood Polls DMing the New York Times reporters saying F you.
00:05:55.000 So Wedgwood Polls is now admitting that it was all fake and they're claiming it was an experiment.
00:06:01.000 It was all an experiment.
00:06:02.000 Quote Wedgwood Polling, an experimental project to demonstrate the vulnerabilities, lack of oversight, and overall low barrier to entry.
00:06:09.000 In the modern political polling industry makes this public statement.
00:06:12.000 Having previously worked in the polling and research sector, we washed as the public's trust in polling eroded alongside a rise in unverified, low quality methodology.
00:06:21.000 We wanted to test a sample hypothesis.
00:06:23.000 How easy is it for an entirely fabricated polling firm to gain traction, be taken seriously, and expose how little scrutinization exists in media and public commentary?
00:06:30.000 The short answer, far too easy.
00:06:32.000 Despite having no history, formal credentials, or real data behind the vast majority of our releases, Wedgwood polling was added to major polling aggregators, including The New York Times, 50 plus one, and Vote Hub, and repeatedly treated as a legitimate data source.
00:06:45.000 Our fabricated numbers were given instant credibility across national media platforms, including being cited on air and in reporting by outlets such as MS Now.
00:06:55.000 The ease with which unverified figures were absorbed into mainstream political narratives highlights a systemic breakdown in media vetting and data aggregation.
00:07:04.000 And so they basically are now claiming that they made up all these fraudulent polls as a way of exposing how bad the polling industry is.
00:07:11.000 I don't buy this, apparently.
00:07:12.000 There are a lot of screenshots of them basically soliciting business and all this.
00:07:16.000 So it sort of sounds like the excuse of the guy who's been searching kiddie porn on his computer and then says that he was just doing it for research.
00:07:24.000 In any case, Wedgwood's statement concludes Wedgwood polling was never intended to sway an election or permanently mislead the public.
00:07:35.000 It was designed as a wake up call.
00:07:37.000 If a fictional entity run by a small group of industry veterans can be integrated into major polling averages and cited by major news organizations, the standards for how polling data is vetted, aggregated, and reported must change.
00:07:48.000 Okay, so the New York Times did cite Wedgwood 15 times between June and October.
00:07:57.000 It was cited by Decision Desk 17 times in that same period.
00:08:03.000 Now, again, they are trying to rerun all of their polling averages.
00:08:07.000 Because of all of this.
00:08:09.000 But their polls always tend toward the Democrats.
00:08:12.000 So if your polling average, right, we were talking about polling averages before, if your polling average included an LCIAD poll in Michigan that showed him up a week and a half ago plus six, they're just making that up.
00:08:27.000 They have Troy Jackson up four in Maine.
00:08:30.000 That was included in the poll averages.
00:08:31.000 Now it makes a huge difference in some of these states that aren't routinely polled.
00:08:34.000 Maine doesn't have tons of polls.
00:08:36.000 So if it turns out that one of your four polls is just totally made up by a Democrat Oppo firm, Well, that's going to skew the poll average.
00:08:42.000 And then that is going to generate people saying, well, the race is already over.
00:08:45.000 I'm not going to vote.
00:08:46.000 It has a real impact.
00:08:50.000 You can see that all of these polls are basically biased toward Democrats.
00:08:55.000 Ohio has Brown up four, Tallarico up two.
00:09:00.000 Even in Democratic districts, I mean, even in heavily Republican districts, they'll show Republicans up, but very, very, very slightly.
00:09:07.000 An example.
00:09:08.000 So they'll say that Ricketts in Nebraska, who is going to win that race, that he's only up four in Nebraska.
00:09:14.000 So, in other words, they're push polling.
00:09:16.000 They're push polling.
00:09:19.000 And as you can see in their push polling, it has an impact.
00:09:23.000 So, they did a poll for the Democratic primary in Michigan, El Sayed versus Stevens versus McMorrow, and it showed El Sayed up seven.
00:09:31.000 In fact, pretty much all of their push polling showed El Sayed with a heavy lead in Michigan.
00:09:37.000 Mallory McMorrow, who dropped out, says she dropped out because of Wedgwood polling.
00:09:40.000 Quote As one of the candidates featured in these polls, the infamous one in late June that showed me plummeting into single digits.
00:09:48.000 Which was at odds with our internals.
00:09:49.000 Here's the impact of this experiment.
00:09:51.000 Donations dried up.
00:09:52.000 Volunteers were devastated and pleading for guidance on what to do.
00:09:55.000 Reporters hounded me with calls to drop out.
00:09:57.000 Sure, a point was proven.
00:09:58.000 Polling is broken.
00:09:59.000 But tens of thousands of people poured their hearts, time, energy, hard earned money into something they believed in for a year and a half, and it was treated like a game.
00:10:07.000 Our volunteers gave their all, and then some.
00:10:10.000 I felt like I had let so many of them down.
00:10:12.000 If this teaches us anything, don't get complacent and don't trust the polls.
00:10:16.000 Lock in, sign up for a canvassing ship, leave nothing to chance over the next two weeks.
00:10:21.000 And meanwhile, another polling founder named Adam Carlson says that Wedgwood went to great lengths to lie privately about what it was that they were doing.
00:10:30.000 And then showed some screenshots.
00:10:32.000 Quote, do you only do online polls?
00:10:33.000 Do you have any sponsors or is this all out of pocket for now?
00:10:36.000 And they said, yes and no.
00:10:37.000 We are starting with an initial $10,000 investment from me and are hoping to attract clients after getting a few polls out.
00:10:42.000 We'll also try to crowdfund a bit.
00:10:44.000 Said Republican clients probably.
00:10:47.000 While we currently use Dynata, we also incorporate data from the Bonfire Voter File.
00:10:51.000 To help with our LV model and waiting, we plan to shift to RBS fielded with text to online once we get funding.
00:10:57.000 And they said, whoever will sponsor us, really, I myself am a progressive Democrat while my co pollster is a Republican.
00:11:03.000 So, again, what does this mean?
00:11:05.000 It means that if you are reading the polling data and all the polling data is very close, the only thing you know about all of these elections is that they're close.
00:11:14.000 Also, there is a game.
00:11:17.000 If you want to hide in the crowd, if you want to have an impact on the polling average, but you want to hide in the crowd, like you're going to fake the polls.
00:11:22.000 You don't even have to fake them.
00:11:24.000 All you have to do is change the sample sizes in various areas.
00:11:27.000 If you're going to do that, you can easily skew the polling average.
00:11:31.000 The only poll that matters is the one that actually includes actual voters voting on the day of the thing, plus the absentee ballots and mailings and all the rest.
00:11:39.000 The only poll that matters is the election itself.
00:11:41.000 So don't fall for any op that tells you that these elections are foregone conclusions or that the polling means a tsunami or anything like that.
00:11:48.000 It's not what the polls even say.
00:11:51.000 And right now you're watching as people rush to group because let's say that you're a pollster and you have an outlier poll.
00:11:57.000 Very often, you'll ditch the outlier poll in order to ensure that you're not the one with an egg on your face if it turns out that you're wrong.
00:12:05.000 Better to stick with the group average.
00:12:07.000 Folks, we talk a lot about the midterms here on the program, and you want to keep up with all the info, right?
00:12:11.000 Well, there is a great way to do that.
00:12:13.000 In fact, the best way to do it.
00:12:15.000 Unparalleled.
00:12:15.000 The Daily Wire's Election Hub.
00:12:16.000 It's so awesome.
00:12:17.000 You should check it out.
00:12:18.000 Interactive maps, a March Madness style bracket challenge where you can make and save your picks for the most contested races in the nation.
00:12:23.000 All of our midterm related coverage in just one place.
00:12:26.000 And then on election night, You can join me and the other hosts live from Nashville for all night coverage as we break down every race, every map, every call, what it all means for the country.
00:12:35.000 So either we will be happier than you expect or we will be, you know, at the bottom of the bottle.
00:12:40.000 The drama will be live.
00:12:41.000 Turn to the Daily Wire Tuesday, November 3rd at 7 p.m. Central for our 2026 midterm coverage.
00:12:47.000 Okay.
00:12:47.000 Meanwhile, again, the, the odds on the Senate are very, very close, even in the prediction market.
00:12:52.000 So CalShee, one of our sponsors, it shows this is not by any stretch of the imagination, like a blowout in favor of the Democrats.
00:13:01.000 And these sort of late breaking movements in the prediction markets, I do not think is reflective of anything but the narrative power that's being presumed.
00:13:11.000 Basically, if you go back to February, from February all the way to the beginning of October, the Calchee markets had this thing dead even.
00:13:19.000 Today, the Calchee markets suggest that Democrats essentially have a 66% shot of winning the United States Senate.
00:13:27.000 Again, I think that's overstated, and I think that is a reflection of people who are putting their money where their mouth is when it comes to the narrative.
00:13:35.000 All of which brings us to the nature of the current race.
00:13:38.000 So, you have been told, for example, that Michigan, El Sayed, has a clear advantage.
00:13:41.000 Michigan, you know, no big deal, Michigan.
00:13:45.000 El Sayed's going to win.
00:13:46.000 Okay.
00:13:47.000 Abdul El Sayed in Michigan is not acting like a candidate who's running away with this thing.
00:13:51.000 He's just not.
00:13:53.000 Sometimes you can tell by the behavior of candidates where things are.
00:13:57.000 So, for example, Abdul Rahman El Sayed is now disavowing the Muslim Brotherhood.
00:14:04.000 It took him weeks and weeks and weeks to do it.
00:14:07.000 Weeks and weeks and weeks.
00:14:09.000 Here he was walking out of the Detroit Economic Club and suddenly saying, Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, I disavowed the Muslim Brotherhood.
00:14:16.000 I don't believe you.
00:14:18.000 In fact, why don't we show a montage of him obfuscating on the Muslim Brotherhood for months and then we'll get to what he did yesterday?
00:14:18.000 I don't believe you.
00:14:26.000 You or your family have any ties to the Muslim Brotherhood?
00:14:29.000 No, but let's talk about this.
00:14:32.000 No, you don't have any ties.
00:14:33.000 No.
00:14:34.000 And your family doesn't.
00:14:35.000 Do you support the designations of the Muslim Brotherhood in those countries?
00:14:35.000 No.
00:14:38.000 I want to understand.
00:14:39.000 Show me that they're engaged.
00:14:39.000 Egypt?
00:14:41.000 Any organization is engaged in political violence.
00:14:43.000 I will back a terrorist.
00:14:45.000 So on October 7th, the Egyptian chapter.
00:14:47.000 As I said, any organization engaged in political violence or calling for political violence is engaged in terrorism, and I would support those designations.
00:14:54.000 I have not heard you disavow them yet.
00:14:55.000 Have you disavowed them?
00:14:56.000 I haven't heard you disavow them yet.
00:14:58.000 Do you?
00:14:59.000 Great.
00:15:01.000 Again, obfuscating, obfuscating.
00:15:02.000 But now, now, at the very end of the campaign, he is now disavowing the Muslim Brotherhood.
00:15:07.000 Again, here's my question.
00:15:08.000 Whenever somebody does a reversal like this, what I need from them is what about the Muslim Brotherhood do you disavow?
00:15:15.000 Why do your entire family associate with the Muslim Brotherhood?
00:15:19.000 Why are you taking money from your father in law, who's a front for Muslim Brotherhood associated groups like ISNA?
00:15:25.000 Why?
00:15:27.000 Tell me specifically, what about them do you disavow?
00:15:29.000 Because then he'll start obfuscating again.
00:15:32.000 But here he is now doing the routine.
00:15:36.000 I clearly disavowed it.
00:15:38.000 But here's the question the implication of the question is that somehow I'll have dual loyalties, right?
00:15:42.000 And there's nothing about my history or record to imply that.
00:15:45.000 So, you know, go ahead and watch where I clearly disavow.
00:15:48.000 If it's not clear enough, I clearly disavow it.
00:15:51.000 Are we good?
00:15:54.000 No, we're not good because I need you to explain why you disavow it.
00:15:57.000 And more importantly, All the other things that you've done and commented on.
00:16:00.000 You know, you just shouting, I declare bankruptcy like Michael Scott in the middle of the office doesn't actually mean that you've declared bankruptcy.
00:16:07.000 I don't believe you.
00:16:08.000 I think you're lying.
00:16:10.000 And the reason I think you're lying is because you can't explain any of the changes or your belief system.
00:16:15.000 But this is the point.
00:16:16.000 The reason Al Said is doing this, put aside the actual merits of what he's saying, the reason he's doing this is because it was damaging him in the polls.
00:16:22.000 He is vulnerable.
00:16:24.000 Other indicators he's vulnerable.
00:16:25.000 He's going and he's campaigning heavily in the black community.
00:16:27.000 Question.
00:16:28.000 Do Michigan Democrats typically have to campaign super heavy in the black community?
00:16:33.000 I really, explain that one to me.
00:16:34.000 Here is Abdurrahman El Sayed on a podcast called The Root, which is obviously meant to have a largely black audience.
00:16:43.000 And there he basically says something more Islamophobic than anything that I've heard in the recent past.
00:16:51.000 For too many black Detroiters in particular, their experience with somebody who looks like me is not a good one.
00:16:59.000 You go into a gas station, you go to a party store.
00:17:02.000 You're being talked at from behind multiple glasses.
00:17:05.000 Yeah.
00:17:06.000 If you're a woman, you're being cat called.
00:17:07.000 If you're a kid, you're being sold to Lucy at the back.
00:17:09.000 You're being denied a bathroom.
00:17:11.000 I've always tried to be on the right side of that.
00:17:13.000 But I also understand that, like, if that's your experience with somebody whose name is like mine, that leaves a terrible taste in your mouth.
00:17:21.000 Okay, so he's not a gas station, Abdul.
00:17:23.000 I mean, the stuff that he is saying about Arabs in Michigan, by the way, the person who owns the small shop in Michigan behind the glass is doing more for Michigan than anything Abdul El Sayed has ever done.
00:17:34.000 That guy is, you know, I assume that guy is not a supporter.
00:17:35.000 Supporter of terrorism, and that he's not going to occupy a seat in the Senate in order to destroy the country.
00:17:41.000 The reason he is doing all of this, the reason that he is making these moves, is because he is in danger of losing.
00:17:48.000 Now, again, every so often, the real Abdullah el Sayed escapes the laboratory.
00:17:53.000 So, for example, he's now dismissing wait times at medical offices because who cares?
00:17:58.000 Who cares?
00:18:02.000 I have a friend whose cousin, who used to own a goldfish, their former owner, that person had to wait in a long line for an MRI.
00:18:11.000 I say, well, that sucks for them, but also that person has never had to worry about medical debt.
00:18:19.000 So, you waiting in long lines for an MRI or not getting the cancer care that you need?
00:18:19.000 Oh, okay.
00:18:24.000 That's okay, according to Abdul El Sayed.
00:18:26.000 Also, he says that the Second Amendment only allows you to own a musket, which we'll see how that goes over because Michigan is a very gun rights friendly state.
00:18:35.000 I'm going to swear an oath to the Constitution.
00:18:37.000 The Constitution has the Second Amendment in it, but the Second Amendment, just so we all are clear, Even the most conservative folks, they hew to this idea called originalism.
00:18:47.000 And originalism is the idea that you should interpret the Constitution in the context in which the Constitution was written.
00:18:54.000 When they promised the right to bear arms, they had muskets.
00:18:59.000 So, yeah, everyone should have equal rights to a musket.
00:19:04.000 God, he is.
00:19:05.000 Good luck with this.
00:19:06.000 I mean, truly.
00:19:07.000 Has there ever occurred to anybody that he is smooth and also a bad candidate?
00:19:12.000 This should not be a competitive race.
00:19:13.000 This is a very competitive race.
00:19:15.000 Speaking of competitive races, I have to say things are getting rough out there.
00:19:18.000 Over in Maine, where Troy Jackson is running neck and neck with Susan Collins.
00:19:25.000 The Republican Senate Leadership Fund is relying on AI to put out a song that has already gone viral on the radio over there.
00:19:34.000 It is targeting the fact that Troy Jackson is married to his cousin, or was married to his cousin.
00:19:42.000 And it's a little rough, man.
00:19:49.000 Troy Jackson is weird.
00:19:52.000 He has two kids with his cousin.
00:19:56.000 If he'll screw his own family, he'll screw yours too.
00:20:03.000 Troy Jackson's a bully.
00:20:06.000 He's always yelling at women.
00:20:08.000 Shut up, Susan.
00:20:10.000 If he'll screw his own family, he'll screw yours too.
00:20:13.000 What do I mean?
00:20:40.000 SLAPAC is responsible for the content of this advertising, paid for by SLAPAC, not authorized by any candidate or candidates committee.
00:20:45.000 SLAPAC.org.
00:20:49.000 Hmm.
00:20:51.000 Hmm.
00:20:53.000 Hmm.
00:20:55.000 Uh, is this election over yet, guys?
00:20:58.000 Oh boy.
00:21:00.000 Okay, then.
00:21:02.000 And meanwhile, on the left, Shadi Hamid, who is out there constantly defending radical Islam, says it's totally fine if Abdul El Sayed's mom was involved with the Muslim Brotherhood.
00:21:11.000 So on the one side, you have people.
00:21:12.000 Putting out massive plays about Troy Jackson nailing his cousin.
00:21:15.000 And on the other hand, you have Shadi Hamid being like, is there really something wrong with being a terrorist?
00:21:20.000 Is there?
00:21:22.000 I mean, who cares about the Muslim Brotherhood?
00:21:26.000 Oh, boy.
00:21:27.000 All this is just great.
00:21:28.000 Okay, so let's get back to the actual stakes of the election.
00:21:30.000 Put aside the absurdity for a second.
00:21:31.000 The actual stakes of the election.
00:21:33.000 What do Democrats want?
00:21:34.000 Okay, the thing that Democrats want is radicalism.
00:21:38.000 This is the thing that they desperately want.
00:21:41.000 This election is not a referendum on Donald Trump.
00:21:43.000 This election is going to be about whether the Democrats.
00:21:48.000 Essentially, take over the United States under the auspices of the DSA.
00:21:52.000 That's what this is about.
00:21:53.000 Hassan Piker is saying this openly.
00:21:56.000 DSA, the Democratic Socialist of America, is not simply a tool for popular candidates to run on the Democratic ballot line and become popular Democrats.
00:22:05.000 We are not here to do PR for the Democratic Party.
00:22:10.000 Okay.
00:22:10.000 We're not here to do PR for the Democratic Party.
00:22:12.000 We're here to accomplish tangible policy goals.
00:22:16.000 Okay.
00:22:17.000 We have an agenda.
00:22:19.000 The agenda is to ultimately build socialism, to retool this capitalist system to yield more prosperous outcomes for all and not just those who have capital, not just those who simply care about profit.
00:22:37.000 Okay?
00:22:40.000 It's about building a better future for all.
00:22:43.000 That's the goal.
00:22:44.000 So, this is about the communist revolution.
00:22:47.000 That's what it's all about the communist revolution.
00:22:47.000 Okay?
00:22:50.000 And they're saying it out loud.
00:22:52.000 One influencer named Mary Beth Barone.
00:22:55.000 She's out there saying she's a Dior bag socialist, which I've got to tell you, maybe you're a D bag socialist.
00:23:01.000 I'm not sure that there's such a thing as a Dior bag socialist.
00:23:05.000 Well, I'm a Dior bag socialist, which means I have this deep belief that you can be a socialist and have a Dior bag.
00:23:12.000 Because socialism, I asked Iran Momdani this when I first met him.
00:23:16.000 I said, How do you explain socialism?
00:23:17.000 And he said, Giving people the resources that they need to live a dignified life.
00:23:22.000 So there's this idea that socialism is like, It's like a, I guess, economic strategy so that everybody lives in poverty, right?
00:23:32.000 That's how the right wants you to think about socialism.
00:23:35.000 But actually, it's that they want nobody to live in poverty and that there's enough wealth in this country that no one should have to, but it's being hoarded by like 10 guys.
00:23:44.000 And so, if we redistributed the wealth, made them pay taxes, we could solve a lot of problems.
00:23:50.000 That's how I would agree.
00:23:51.000 So, the wealthy pay all the net taxes in the United States.
00:23:53.000 Also, Dior is a private company.
00:23:55.000 Generating Dior bags.
00:23:57.000 But this is what the Democratic Party wants.
00:23:59.000 This is the future of the Democratic Party.
00:24:01.000 One person who's saying this clearly is James Carville.
00:24:03.000 So James Carville is out there openly saying that he would rather that Republicans keep the House by five.
00:24:08.000 If the Democrats take the House narrowly, then basically the DSA rules the roost.
00:24:15.000 However, I would be disappointed if it comes in at two or 25 House seats.
00:24:22.000 That would be, that would almost be, I would rather the Republicans.
00:24:26.000 Keep the house by five, then the Delcrans win by five.
00:24:30.000 Because if that happens, they're hostage to the DSN.
00:24:34.000 Hakim cannot move.
00:24:36.000 There's no place for him to go.
00:24:40.000 Again, he is not wrong about this, but the entire Democratic Party is being held hostage already by the Democratic Socialists of America.
00:24:47.000 Unless you think this is just about, you know, a bunch of the great lie.
00:24:50.000 It's such an obvious line.
00:24:52.000 People like Zarma, I'm just about local issues and affordability.
00:24:56.000 Just paste that grin.
00:24:58.000 That's affordability.
00:25:00.000 And Intifada.
00:25:03.000 And same thing with Abdul Sayyid.
00:25:05.000 I'm just here about the affordability.
00:25:07.000 I'm just here.
00:25:07.000 I mean, Let's just be clear about this.
00:25:09.000 It's just about the affordability.
00:25:10.000 No, it's not.
00:25:11.000 It's about your national movement to destroy the United States.
00:25:14.000 That's the thing that you want, which is why Zoran Momdani is now saying that it is critical to New York City that El Sayed win in Michigan.
00:25:22.000 Now, I was under the impression that Michigan and New York City are two completely separate jurisdictions and that the federal Senate has little to do with the governance of New York City, a locality.
00:25:33.000 Well, I wonder why Momdani thinks it's important for El Sayed to win.
00:25:36.000 I wonder why.
00:25:37.000 It's a mystery.
00:25:40.000 When you think about Dr. El-Sayed's campaign, I often go back to the way that he describes it.
00:25:47.000 Money out of politics, money in your pocket, Medicare for all.
00:25:51.000 Those are concerns that ring true for Michiganders.
00:25:55.000 They're also concerns that ring true for New Yorkers.
00:25:58.000 And I think that his victory and the victory of Democrats across this country is of critical importance to our city because what it also indicates is a willingness to chart a new course in Washington that has working people at the heart of it.
00:26:12.000 And so we're hopeful.
00:26:13.000 And yet we also know that hope doesn't win elections.
00:26:16.000 The action that it motivates does.
00:26:17.000 And we look forward to that.
00:26:21.000 Let's just grin about it.
00:26:22.000 Let's just grin.
00:26:23.000 This is where we're going.
00:26:25.000 The entire narrative that is being driven by the DSA and is being promoted by the legacy media is that the United States sucks and requires fundamental transformation.
00:26:32.000 Now, that sometimes meets reality.
00:26:34.000 And what has to be the most delicious piece of the day is a piece from Wired.
00:26:39.000 It is titled, They Fled Trump's America and Now They Regret It.
00:26:42.000 Quote, in the autumn of 2024, Annie was ready for something new.
00:26:46.000 She was living in the southern United States when her husband received an unexpected job offer that would move them to a town just outside London.
00:26:52.000 They were in their 20s with no kids.
00:26:54.000 We wanted to take a risk, she says.
00:26:56.000 While researching their new destination on Reddit, TikTok, and Instagram, Annie found Americans eager to explain how enchanting life in the British suburbs could be.
00:27:03.000 All the benefits of a small town, just a short train ride away from one of the biggest cities in the world.
00:27:07.000 The more she read, the sunnier her expectations about the UK's healthcare system, social culture, and European transportation systems became.
00:27:15.000 They moved before the end of the year, but the reality of life in the UK was dramatically different from what she'd imagined.
00:27:20.000 Quote, there are huge misconceptions about access to quality health care, standard of living.
00:27:25.000 The quality of life is significantly lower than in the United States.
00:27:29.000 She cited challenges she experienced with the NHS's maternity care.
00:27:34.000 Things in the UK that are considered luxury items are very common in America, like a dishwasher and a dryer, she adds.
00:27:39.000 She also found it very common that people just mocked Americans.
00:27:44.000 I found it particularly surprising how people feel so comfortable mocking my accent and culture, even in a workplace environment, she says.
00:27:50.000 The UK is very much a place of it is what it is.
00:27:52.000 But as Americans, we're taught to improve and strive for better things.
00:27:56.000 There's a shock.
00:27:57.000 It turns out that all the lies you bought on TikTok promoted by your legacy left wing media and the influencer class, they're lies.
00:28:03.000 It's not true.
00:28:04.000 And when you move outside the United States, it turns out you want to move back.
00:28:09.000 A huge number of people have been moving outside the United States based on all of this.
00:28:13.000 In Spain, the number of American residents has reached a record high in 2026.
00:28:17.000 The Financial Times reported in April, there was a 63% increase in American applications to Ireland's foreign births register.
00:28:24.000 The UK Home Office reported a surge of residency, but it turns out that people who go there find that it kind of sucks.
00:28:33.000 According to one Josh, who moved to Berlin in 2023, he had already lived in Germany.
00:28:38.000 He spoke German.
00:28:39.000 He had friends in Berlin, but, quote, finding work was so hard, and the endless bureaucracy had grown worse since I'd left.
00:28:45.000 I missed the friendlier people, freedom of speech, and ease of daily life in the United States.
00:28:49.000 If you aren't born and raised there and don't look German, you'll never be fully accepted, he said.
00:28:52.000 Perhaps the best is Nick, who decided that he was going to move from liberal New York City.
00:28:57.000 To Poland, to avoid the right wing populism.
00:29:02.000 This is Casablanca.
00:29:03.000 You move there for the waters.
00:29:05.000 You're misinformed.
00:29:07.000 Quote In retrospect, he wonders if he got caught up in the frenzy of discourse when he chose to leave in the first place.
00:29:12.000 Yeah, man.
00:29:14.000 That is right.
00:29:15.000 And listen, our most wealthy and famous fall for this.
00:29:20.000 In July 2025, Ellen DeGeneres said she was moving to England because of Trump.
00:29:26.000 And then she just bought a $27 million mansion in Montecito.
00:29:29.000 Rosie O'Donnell went to Ireland and now she's back, unfortunately.
00:29:33.000 So it turns out that all the same people who hate the United States and talk about how terrible it is and how we're responsible for all the world's ills and so unequal and so unfree and it's fascistic, they go somewhere else and they realize, oh, wait, what did I do?
00:29:49.000 This is why I say the best corrective to anti Americanism is an airplane.
00:29:53.000 Take it somewhere for more than like a week, more than just visiting the tourist sites.
00:29:56.000 Like, go live somewhere else for two months and see how it works for you.
00:30:00.000 All right.
00:30:02.000 Meanwhile, on the cultural front, when I say that the trans politics will come back, I really, really mean it.
00:30:10.000 So, latest WNBA update.
00:30:14.000 The WNBA has now informed Enos Cancer Freedom that he is not eligible to play in the WNBA.
00:30:18.000 And the reason he is not eligible to play is because he is not a woman.
00:30:23.000 But they can't explain what a woman is.
00:30:25.000 So there's that.
00:30:27.000 Quote As indicated in my previous response to your inquiry, this is Kathy Engelbert, the WNBA commissioner.
00:30:34.000 WNBA officials are responsible for enforcing rules and assessing fouls and other violations that occur during gameplay.
00:30:40.000 Based on that review, the league may upgrade fouls or take disciplinary action where appropriate.
00:30:44.000 Fans in WNBA arenas are governed by the WNBA Fan Code of Conduct, which requires that they enjoy the basketball experience free from disruptive behavior.
00:30:52.000 This is talking about why he was thrown out of a game recently for literally standing up with a t shirt.
00:30:57.000 Quote With respect to your questions regarding eligibility, only women are eligible to play in the WNBA, and the individuals you cite in your letter are both men.
00:31:05.000 How does she know that?
00:31:06.000 How does she know that?
00:31:08.000 And it remains one of the great hilarious idiocies of modern society that we have to pretend we don't know these things.
00:31:16.000 Our friend Matt Nuclear, who does a streaming show with us where he debates folks, he was touring with TPUSA and he was accosted by a male to female transgender.
00:31:25.000 This is a man with fake breasts.
00:31:28.000 And the exchange went poorly for this person.
00:31:32.000 Do men have like these?
00:31:35.000 This is like the weirdest thing ever.
00:31:37.000 You were born with a penis, correct?
00:31:38.000 Am I wrong?
00:31:39.000 Sure, I was.
00:31:40.000 Okay, perfect.
00:31:41.000 So you're a man?
00:31:42.000 No.
00:31:42.000 No, I'm not.
00:31:43.000 I'm a woman.
00:31:43.000 What makes you a woman?
00:31:44.000 I'm curious.
00:31:45.000 The fact that I say I am.
00:31:47.000 Okay, so I say I'm a woman now.
00:31:48.000 Am I a woman?
00:31:49.000 No.
00:31:49.000 Why not?
00:31:50.000 Because there's a lack of action behind it.
00:31:52.000 So, what actions do I have to take?
00:31:53.000 Believing it, first of all.
00:31:54.000 How do you know it's not genuine?
00:31:56.000 Because it's pretty fing obvious.
00:31:57.000 So, when you believe someone is being genuine about believing they're a woman, that's what makes them a woman, correct?
00:32:02.000 No, because you are not a woman because you, quote, say you're a woman.
00:32:08.000 Yeah, I agree that I'm a male.
00:32:09.000 You're a male too, correct?
00:32:10.000 Biologically speaking, and that's just a fact.
00:32:12.000 Well, male and sex is genuine.
00:32:15.000 Totally a biological phenomenon.
00:32:17.000 So, yes, of course, that's a good point.
00:32:18.000 Gender and sex are two separate things.
00:32:19.000 Yeah, but they're sort of inseparable.
00:32:21.000 Gender happens up here, sex happens down here.
00:32:24.000 For you, I mean, it obviously is delusion.
00:32:26.000 What's up there?
00:32:31.000 Oh, I always love them saying delusion.
00:32:33.000 I don't think that you're helping your case, with all due respect.
00:32:40.000 Again, don't ask for logic from people for whom the illogic is the point.
00:32:44.000 What an amazing video you just watched.
00:32:46.000 Wasn't that amazing?
00:32:47.000 Well, you know, if you think so, head on over to dailywire.comslash subscribe to watch the full show ad free or check out this crazy story here.