The Joe Rogan Experience - October 07, 2026


Joe Rogan Experience #2562 - Dan McClellan

Hosted by
Guests
Mentioned
Joe Rogan Experience #2561 - LL Cool J

Episode Stats


Length

2 hours and 35 minutes

Words per minute

171.18

Word count

26,642

Sentence count

1,958


Transcript

Transcripts from "The Joe Rogan Experience" are sourced from the Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool. Explore them interactively here.
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:02.000 Joe Rogan Podcast, check it out.
00:00:04.000 The Joe Rogan Experience.
00:00:06.000 Train by day, Joe Rogan Podcast by night, all day.
00:00:08.000 All right, we're up.
00:00:12.000 What's up, man?
00:00:14.000 Good to meet you, man.
00:00:15.000 Thank you so much for having me out.
00:00:15.000 Good to meet you, too.
00:00:17.000 It's always weird when you watch a bunch of a guy's content and then you meet him.
00:00:21.000 You know, it's very odd.
00:00:22.000 It is.
00:00:23.000 There's a parasocial relationship thing there that's a little off putting at first.
00:00:29.000 I remember I had a long time ago, I got a notification I was being followed on Instagram by Joel McHale.
00:00:34.000 And I was like, sweet.
00:00:36.000 Like, texted my family.
00:00:38.000 And then, like, a couple weeks later, I got a message from him.
00:00:41.000 He was like, hey, man, big fan, loved your stuff.
00:00:43.000 We got to hang out sometime.
00:00:44.000 And I was like, all right, cool.
00:00:46.000 He's a really nice guy.
00:00:47.000 He's incredible.
00:00:48.000 He's a wonderful guy, got a lovely family.
00:00:50.000 And he was coming out to Salt Lake City to do Fan X a couple years ago, which is our version of Comic Con.
00:00:56.000 And I was like, hey, let's do dinner.
00:00:58.000 Yeah, you're a giant comic freak.
00:01:00.000 I am, yeah.
00:01:01.000 And I was like, let's do dinner.
00:01:03.000 He's like, it's a date, but I'm a, what did he call himself?
00:01:07.000 An arrogant foodie.
00:01:08.000 So he was like, So I got to pick the restaurant.
00:01:11.000 But he's like, Let's get on the phone and chat for a minute.
00:01:15.000 And I called him.
00:01:16.000 He picked up the phone.
00:01:17.000 He's like, Dan McClone, Joel McHale.
00:01:19.000 He's like, This is so weird talking to you.
00:01:21.000 I was like, Joel, I promise you it's a lot weirder for me.
00:01:24.000 So I know exactly what that's like.
00:01:26.000 It's very odd.
00:01:27.000 I try to give people as much grace as possible when they meet me because I've probably been in their head more than, you know, headphones and shit for thousands of years.
00:01:35.000 It's odd.
00:01:36.000 It's odd for me.
00:01:37.000 So I'm sure it's odd for other people too.
00:01:38.000 And I'm, Kind of like, I don't even recall if I'm proud of everything I've ever said, but so I don't know what kind of impression somebody has of me.
00:01:38.000 Yeah.
00:01:46.000 Oh, I have a great impression of you.
00:01:47.000 Well, I appreciate that.
00:01:49.000 And I'm certainly not proud of everything I've said.
00:01:51.000 We're all good.
00:01:52.000 We're all good.
00:01:52.000 Because I don't really watch my stuff back.
00:01:55.000 I don't even remember a lot of stuff I've said.
00:01:57.000 Oh, that's a real problem with me.
00:01:58.000 There's people that I forget I talk to.
00:02:01.000 Okay.
00:02:01.000 And then we bring them up in the podcast.
00:02:03.000 I'm like, gosh, you have that guy on.
00:02:04.000 And Jamie's like, we actually had him on three years ago.
00:02:07.000 It happens.
00:02:08.000 It happens once every six.
00:02:10.000 Months.
00:02:10.000 Yeah, we deal with that when we're like, what should we talk about today?
00:02:14.000 I'm like, I don't know.
00:02:14.000 We talk about this, and they're like, two weeks ago, we talked about that.
00:02:18.000 Yeah, that is an issue with you, I would imagine, more because you're dealing with very specific structure and texts.
00:02:25.000 And it's also something that you have this incredible deep knowledge of, so there's probably no way you can remember the specific instances in which you talked about it.
00:02:36.000 Yeah, definitely it's an issue.
00:02:38.000 But it's also, I think, something that's kind of baked into the reason my My channel is so beneficial to a lot of people because I can repeat stuff over and over again.
00:02:47.000 Because as my audience grows, there are always new people who haven't been exposed to a lot of things.
00:02:51.000 So there are actually a handful of things I kind of, not programmatically, but every six months or so, I'll be like, yeah, it's probably time to talk about this again.
00:02:59.000 And then I already have the foundation there.
00:03:02.000 I can recall most of what I said.
00:03:04.000 But yeah, I do have to go refresh my memory.
00:03:06.000 What was that manuscript called?
00:03:08.000 I got to figure out, you know, translate that again, something like that.
00:03:11.000 So it is both a blessing and a curse because it means I can.
00:03:15.000 If I'm having a slow day, can't think of something to talk about, maybe I just recycle something I did six months ago.
00:03:21.000 And there are going to be thousands of people who hadn't seen it before.
00:03:24.000 At least.
00:03:24.000 Yeah, you have an enormous library.
00:03:26.000 Like, how many videos have you put out all told?
00:03:29.000 Around 4,000.
00:03:33.000 I see people who put out that many podcast episodes.
00:03:36.000 Yeah, and I'm aware that's rarefied air.
00:03:38.000 I think we're at 2,600.
00:03:41.000 Almost 2,900.
00:03:42.000 Almost 2,900 plus.
00:03:44.000 Oh, it's including all the other ones.
00:03:46.000 Oh, is that including all of them?
00:03:47.000 Yeah.
00:03:47.000 So almost 3,000, including.
00:03:49.000 Fight companions, MMA podcasts, things of those like.
00:03:53.000 Yeah, but that's two to three hours or more each, too.
00:03:58.000 Cooks the brain, Dan.
00:04:00.000 I don't know if it's good.
00:04:01.000 My memory is so weird.
00:04:04.000 It's very good sometimes and also terrible other times.
00:04:08.000 And I think my hard drive is overwhelmed.
00:04:11.000 I'm the same way, particularly when I'm on the spot.
00:04:14.000 Like, I lose names.
00:04:15.000 Yeah.
00:04:16.000 Like crazy.
00:04:17.000 I went, my kids were like, you should try it for Jeopardy.
00:04:20.000 And I went through the first phase, and then there were like this not like an in person thing, but a live online thing.
00:04:26.000 And I just froze up.
00:04:27.000 Everything, I was like, I can see his face.
00:04:29.000 I know the dude inside out.
00:04:30.000 I can't remember the name.
00:04:32.000 Do you do anything to enhance your memory?
00:04:32.000 I freeze up a lot.
00:04:34.000 In terms of vitamins or nootropics?
00:04:38.000 Or nootropics, I don't know how to pronounce it.
00:04:41.000 There is some research that is suggesting creatine might be a little more helpful for brain function.
00:04:46.000 So I actually do 10 grams of creatine every day.
00:04:54.000 Excellent.
00:04:55.000 Definitely that's a choice that I've made.
00:04:58.000 I try to minimize all the different stuff I'm putting in my body, but I have a slew of vitamins and things like that that I'm taking in addition to it.
00:05:07.000 I've got to get the fiber because.
00:05:08.000 I'm of a certain age, so.
00:05:10.000 That's debatable.
00:05:12.000 Yeah, oddly enough.
00:05:13.000 Yeah.
00:05:13.000 I mean, I don't know where I stand, honestly, because I take in fiber, mostly in the form of fermented vegetables.
00:05:20.000 I'm a big kimchi fan.
00:05:21.000 Okay.
00:05:22.000 But there are quite a few people that have zero fiber and that exist on a carnivore diet.
00:05:27.000 And I think a lot of these people are people with autoimmune issues that tend to have problems with plant based chemicals, like chemicals that are in plants.
00:05:39.000 And then there's a real problem with the American diet, which is glyphosate and herbicides.
00:05:45.000 There's a lot of different herbicides and chemicals used in industrial fertilizer that get into your food.
00:05:52.000 And a lot of people have extreme sensitivities to those things.
00:05:56.000 Yeah.
00:05:56.000 Perhaps due to prolonged exposure, it's very difficult to parse out.
00:06:00.000 You have to talk to a bunch of different people, and a bunch of different people have different takes on it.
00:06:04.000 But I know quite a few very healthy people that don't eat any fiber, they just eat like eggs and chicken and meat.
00:06:11.000 And fish, and that's it.
00:06:13.000 Well, for me, it was definitely.
00:06:14.000 I noticed when I took it, things were easier for me in the morning.
00:06:17.000 Oh, yeah, for sure.
00:06:18.000 And that was where I was like, okay, then done.
00:06:20.000 That's what I'm going to do.
00:06:21.000 There's a transitionary period.
00:06:22.000 I did the carnivore diet strictly once for 60 days.
00:06:26.000 I've never done it for more than that.
00:06:28.000 But for 30 days when I did it, the first four or five, the diarrhea, my friend Tom Segura described it as remarkable breathtaking.
00:06:38.000 It's disturbing.
00:06:39.000 It's like, what is happening to me?
00:06:41.000 But that settles down after a while, and then your bowel movements are not as frequent, but very easy.
00:06:49.000 It's just like, boop, it's like not much, and that's it because there's no fiber.
00:06:53.000 So it's like what is left after you chew all the meat and swallow it.
00:06:56.000 It's like that stuff comes out in the wash, and that's a wrap.
00:07:00.000 I'm not an expert in health and nutrition.
00:07:02.000 I'm not.
00:07:03.000 Not either.
00:07:03.000 I've absorbed a lot of information, but some of it contradicts.
00:07:10.000 It's very hard to know who's right and who's wrong.
00:07:12.000 And I think it's also, it varies biologically.
00:07:15.000 It varies genetically.
00:07:17.000 It varies depending upon where your ancestors are from.
00:07:21.000 There's a lot of people that I know that have real problems with red meat and real problems with certain.
00:07:27.000 I have friends that are vegan that exist healthy.
00:07:30.000 They have no problem with that diet.
00:07:32.000 And then I know friends who've tried it for ethical reasons and their health fell apart and they're like, well, fuck it.
00:07:37.000 I can't do this.
00:07:38.000 Yeah.
00:07:39.000 The thing I try to pay attention to is something called FODMAPS.
00:07:42.000 Have you heard of FODMAPS?
00:07:43.000 No.
00:07:44.000 And now I don't even remember what it stands for, the acronym.
00:07:47.000 But basically, it's.
00:07:49.000 There are certain kinds of substances in foods.
00:07:54.000 The acronym is FODMAP, but they occur a lot in breads and a lot of things with a lot of carbohydrates in them.
00:08:00.000 Here we go.
00:08:01.000 Oh, there we go.
00:08:03.000 Short term three step eating plan to temporarily restrict specific poorly absorbed sugars to help manage digestive distress like bloating, gas, and abdominal pain.
00:08:11.000 Okay.
00:08:12.000 So I started noticing if I was eating certain things throughout the day, I was a lot more bloated and uncomfortable by the time night came around.
00:08:20.000 And I did all kinds of investigating and I figured out when I was.
00:08:24.000 Avoiding things that are high in FOD maps.
00:08:27.000 I was just, I felt better.
00:08:28.000 And what was the word again, Jamie, when FOD's broken down again?
00:08:32.000 A bunch of words.
00:08:33.000 It is a, the word is fermentable, boy, oligosaccharides, disaccharides, and monosaccharides, and polys, polyols, polyols, polyols, short chain carbohydrates and sugar alcohols that small intestines absorb poorly.
00:08:53.000 Huh.
00:08:54.000 What's in that category of those things?
00:08:56.000 What's that?
00:08:58.000 I was trying to get a picture of a.
00:09:01.000 What does it say?
00:09:01.000 I guess there's low and high.
00:09:02.000 Yeah.
00:09:03.000 The more, some things are higher in those things and some things are lower, I guess.
00:09:03.000 Yeah.
00:09:11.000 Suitable on a low FODMAP diet fruit, obviously, vegetables, cereals, milk, tofu, and then the bad ones excessive fructose, lactose, fructans, galactans?
00:09:26.000 Hmm.
00:09:26.000 Legumes.
00:09:27.000 You can't eat beans?
00:09:27.000 Oh, wow.
00:09:28.000 How weird.
00:09:29.000 Well, I think that's the category, and then there are certain members of that category that are high, and certain members of that category.
00:09:35.000 Yeah, it has here baked beans, chickpeas, kidney beans, lentils, soybeans.
00:09:39.000 And what I really noticed there was one day I had, we got a watermelon, and I had like half of it.
00:09:45.000 My wife's like, chill out, man.
00:09:47.000 And I, like, within a couple hours, I was really, really gassy and bloated.
00:09:52.000 And I was like, watermelon.
00:09:52.000 Really?
00:09:53.000 Yeah, and I was like, that has to be the watermelon doing it because I haven't had anything else out of the ordinary.
00:09:59.000 At that.
00:10:00.000 And so I'm sensitive to that kind of stuff, but that's just my own biological makeup.
00:10:04.000 Some people are genetically gifted in other ways.
00:10:07.000 Well, it also depends on what you've done that day.
00:10:10.000 Like, if you've gone a long hike through the mountains and you're exhausted, like, a high carbohydrates and high sugar diet or a meal is actually good for you.
00:10:21.000 There are times when I'm definitely craving it and I'm like, got to listen to my body.
00:10:24.000 I think there's a reason.
00:10:26.000 Yeah.
00:10:26.000 Yeah.
00:10:26.000 Especially when you're worn out, like hiking in particular.
00:10:29.000 Like, you know, you think about if you're at altitude and you do like a three or four mile hike and you're climbing, that's at the end of it, you're fucking spent.
00:10:38.000 You have no sugar in your body.
00:10:39.000 You're, you're, you're, you have a real issue and your body needs something to replenish your muscles.
00:10:45.000 Yeah.
00:10:45.000 I got, I got plenty of fat stores so that when I go out for my run, I can, I can last a little longer.
00:10:50.000 But I, I run at altitude in, uh, by Salt Lake.
00:10:53.000 So, um, so whenever I come, whenever I travel elsewhere, like I go to San Diego a couple times a year or I'm on the East Coast or here, what, The altitude here is not very high.
00:11:02.000 No.
00:11:03.000 So I don't even think it's 1,000 feet.
00:11:04.000 And it's, I can run 10 times as far.
00:11:07.000 Yeah.
00:11:07.000 It's so nice.
00:11:08.000 I enjoy running a lot more because the lack of oxygen, it doesn't take it out of me nearly as quickly.
00:11:13.000 We have a hypoxia chamber in the studio.
00:11:16.000 So, yeah, we have a gym that's connected to the studio.
00:11:19.000 And in the gym is this thing called a hypoxia.
00:11:21.000 It's called the, I forgot the name of it.
00:11:26.000 Exalt.
00:11:27.000 Exalt XP is the company.
00:11:28.000 I forget the name of this.
00:11:29.000 But this thing brings you to, you could vary the altitude.
00:11:33.000 And I put it at 14,000 feet.
00:11:35.000 So, I do these cardio workouts at 14,000 feet.
00:11:39.000 They're very specific depending upon what you're trying to do.
00:11:41.000 Like, there's a VO.
00:11:43.000 I killed myself yesterday because I do this VO2 max one where you're doing four minutes of hard cardio at 14,000 feet above sea level.
00:11:53.000 And then you have like a two minute recovery period.
00:11:57.000 And then you get back on it again.
00:11:59.000 You do it again.
00:12:00.000 And you do a cycle of four of those.
00:12:02.000 And it's fucking hell.
00:12:03.000 Yeah, that's pretty intense.
00:12:05.000 I do the HIT high intensity interval training from time to time, but I don't have the discipline to do it at 14,000 feet.
00:12:12.000 It's not fun, but it has a giant impact, though.
00:12:15.000 So if you do.
00:12:16.000 Go somewhere, like if I had to go to Utah and I'm in the mountains, it's a giant benefit.
00:12:22.000 Okay.
00:12:22.000 Yeah.
00:12:23.000 Because I know I've seen people, they'll wear the masks that are supposed to kind of reduce the oxygen.
00:12:23.000 Yeah.
00:12:29.000 So it's a similar training.
00:12:31.000 It's probably not as effective.
00:12:32.000 Yeah, the mask thing is controversial.
00:12:34.000 I don't know about that.
00:12:35.000 Yeah.
00:12:36.000 There's some devices that you can use that actually strengthen the diaphragm muscles and you breathe through them and you do breathing exercises.
00:12:44.000 But those restrictive masks, I don't know about those.
00:12:47.000 I would imagine they would have the same similar function.
00:12:50.000 It reduces the amount of oxygen you get.
00:12:52.000 But they were a thing, the training mask.
00:12:54.000 It was a thing among MMA fighters for a while.
00:12:56.000 And they've all abandoned it.
00:12:59.000 At least most of them that I know.
00:13:00.000 I don't know.
00:13:02.000 Maybe they got tired of it.
00:13:03.000 Maybe it was too hard already.
00:13:05.000 What was that thing you brought in, that big piece of pottery?
00:13:07.000 Yeah, so I brought in a couple of things.
00:13:10.000 Show and tell.
00:13:11.000 Busted out.
00:13:12.000 So this is a gift for you.
00:13:16.000 Ooh.
00:13:17.000 Thank you.
00:13:18.000 This is a replica.
00:13:20.000 Of my favorite artifact from the ancient world.
00:13:22.000 A friend of mine named Robert Algott runs this website called relics3d.com and he makes these.
00:13:30.000 This is what's called the Kuntilla Dajrud.
00:13:32.000 Can I take a guess as to where it came from?
00:13:35.000 Yeah, go ahead.
00:13:35.000 Turkey.
00:13:36.000 No.
00:13:37.000 Damn.
00:13:37.000 No.
00:13:38.000 It came from Kuntilla Dajrud, oddly enough, which is a.
00:13:42.000 It's down near the Sinai Peninsula.
00:13:44.000 Oh, okay.
00:13:45.000 And so this was a part of a large jar called a Pythos.
00:13:49.000 And this is just one fragment of it.
00:13:51.000 Well, it's a bunch of fragments that were brought together that were discovered that dates to about 800 BCE.
00:13:57.000 And it's one of my favorite artifacts because we have an inscription over top and then a drawing of a male and a female deity.
00:14:05.000 And the inscription talks about somebody asking for or thanking somebody for blessings by Adonai of Shomron or Jehovah of Samaria, the Lord of Samaria, and his Asherah.
00:14:20.000 And so I think the majority of scholars.
00:14:23.000 Agree, this is probably intended to reflect the interpretation of these two deities as the God of Israel and God's wife, Asherah.
00:14:32.000 Very weird looking.
00:14:33.000 Yeah, well, they kind of look almost bovine, and this is probably because they're appealing to some iconographic motifs associated with deities Bess and Besset, which are Egyptian deities that That appears bovine, do you?
00:14:49.000 Aaron Ross Powell, Jr.
00:14:50.000 Just the face a little bit.
00:14:53.000 The body's more anthropomorphic.
00:14:54.000 Image of that on the screen, Jamie?
00:14:57.000 So we could maybe perhaps try to figure out how to spell that.
00:15:01.000 Trying to find the website.
00:15:03.000 I can spell it for you.
00:15:05.000 K U N T. Damn it, hold on.
00:15:07.000 That's K, pause.
00:15:08.000 Go ahead.
00:15:10.000 I L L E T.
00:15:12.000 I L L E T.
00:15:14.000 And then the next word.
00:15:15.000 Okay.
00:15:15.000 I think I got it now.
00:15:16.000 A R A J R U D.
00:15:18.000 And then like relic.
00:15:19.000 Inscription.
00:15:20.000 There are actually a bunch of inscriptions.
00:15:20.000 Yeah.
00:15:25.000 Okay, now I see the bovine now I'm looking at it.
00:15:28.000 And there's the actual.
00:15:29.000 Yeah.
00:15:29.000 Yeah, so this is.
00:15:32.000 Now I see it.
00:15:34.000 It's hard to look at that thing.
00:15:36.000 It looked almost like the.
00:15:37.000 Go back to the other image.
00:15:39.000 Other image, yeah, get me that.
00:15:39.000 Yeah.
00:15:42.000 Yeah, I thought the lines, I thought the head was where the mouth or the nose is.
00:15:49.000 I thought that's with the eyes, and the other thing was like a crown he was wearing.
00:15:52.000 Yeah, well, you've got the headdresses on top that are supposed to indicate their deities.
00:15:59.000 How fucking weird!
00:16:01.000 It's all the old ancient depictions of deities.
00:16:05.000 You're like, what were they doing?
00:16:08.000 This is this to me is the most fascinating thing about pretty much all religious texts.
00:16:13.000 Is like, what was the original thing that they were trying to document, whether it was through oral tradition, then eventually written down?
00:16:21.000 Like, what was the original event?
00:16:23.000 That fascinates me the most about the Bible.
00:16:26.000 It fascinates me the most about the ancient Sumerian writings.
00:16:31.000 I'm just, I don't think all of it is fiction, but I don't think all of it is literal.
00:16:38.000 I think you're also dealing with an enormous amount of time between these events and then the writing down.
00:16:46.000 And then you've highlighted this very much in some of your videos.
00:16:49.000 There's a lot of weirdness when you compare some of these stories, like the story of Moses and Sargon of Akkad.
00:16:57.000 They seem incredibly similar.
00:16:59.000 Yeah.
00:16:59.000 Like almost too similar.
00:17:01.000 All right.
00:17:01.000 Let's talk about AG1 Pro for a second because it's one of the smartest things you can add to your routine.
00:17:05.000 It's just one scoop once a day, multivitamins, probiotics, superfoods, all in there.
00:17:12.000 Plus, it's got enhanced support for muscle strength and recovery built right into it.
00:17:17.000 And what really makes AG1 Pro so special is the creatine.
00:17:21.000 It's a highly studied compound.
00:17:23.000 I'm talking over 500 peer reviewed studies here.
00:17:26.000 And you used to have to go out and buy a separate tub of the stuff, but not anymore.
00:17:31.000 AG1 Pro is one daily supplement with everything you need to help you tackle whatever life throws at you, including the cooler season.
00:17:40.000 Go to drinkag1.comslash Joe Rogan and for a limited time get a free immune support bundle, including a bottle of omega 3 fish oil.
00:17:50.000 And vitamin D tossed in with your first subscription order of AG1 Next Gen or AG1 Pro, backed by a 90 day money back guarantee.
00:18:00.000 That's drinkag1.comslash Joe Rogan.
00:18:03.000 Yeah, I think there's definitely some kind of genetic relationship between the two.
00:18:08.000 And specifically, it's the story of him as a baby being placed into a container and set adrift in a river.
00:18:15.000 That is Sargon the Great, who dates to long before a historical Moses.
00:18:21.000 I think the earliest version of it we've found in the Akkadian literature dates to maybe 9th or 8th century BCE, which is around the time that people think that, or at least scholars think that, the tradition of Moses and the narrative of the Exodus was beginning to come together.
00:18:37.000 So it makes sense that they would draw from that tradition.
00:18:42.000 And I think there are a couple of different reasons for it.
00:18:44.000 One of the reasons is to because that already has some purchase in the zeitgeist.
00:18:52.000 And so if you kind of reflect something that people already are aware of, it kind of makes it a little easier to incorporate into their worldview.
00:19:00.000 And then also, it can also be kind of a challenge to the other tradition.
00:19:05.000 It's like, well, you got your guy, we got ours.
00:19:07.000 Our guy did it better.
00:19:09.000 And this is a lot of what's going on with the representation of Jesus in the New Testament, because there are certain turns of phrase, there are certain things that Jesus does in the New Testament that reflect What the Greco Roman world expected from their emperors and their god men.
00:19:27.000 And so in the New Testament, it's kind of a way to do both of those things to say, we got one of those two, only ours did it better.
00:19:34.000 Oh, interesting.
00:19:34.000 So I think one of the key things to keep in mind is every text, whether it's a text that's inscribed on a piece of pottery or something that wound up in the Bible, every author wrote it down because they wanted to achieve something.
00:19:46.000 We tend to think of language as just about communicating information, but nothing happens in a vacuum.
00:19:51.000 It's all happening in circumstances, in contexts where they're trying to achieve something.
00:19:57.000 And so scholars go to great lengths to try to figure out, well, what precisely would have been achieved by writing this down or by writing any of the texts in the Hebrew Bible or in the New Testament.
00:20:09.000 The best way to figure that out is to try to situate the composition within whatever historical period makes the most sense, whatever we can make the best case for, and figure out how it would have worked in that period, which is why there are some texts that we think were intended as propaganda.
00:20:26.000 There are texts that we think were intended to kind of place one person struggling for power over another person struggling for power.
00:20:34.000 There's a lot of political propaganda going on.
00:20:37.000 And then there are other texts that are intended to try to make people feel better about why.
00:20:42.000 Things aren't going well for them, why bad things are happening to good people and good things aren't happening to bad people.
00:20:49.000 There are tons of different reasons that people are writing texts, but a good illustration of this is genre.
00:20:58.000 All texts have a genre of some kind, and that's basically just a conventionalized set of things that are in the text that help cue people to what kind of text they're looking at.
00:21:09.000 If I start a story once upon a time, you already know it's going to be a specific type of text.
00:21:14.000 So, without even knowing that you're aware of genre, you're aware of the genre of a text.
00:21:21.000 And if you found a piece of paper in a parking lot and it said, dozen eggs, pound of ground beef, you know, prophylaxis, stuff like that, prophylactics actually would be the plural, you know you found a grocery list, a shopping list.
00:21:37.000 And so that's a genre of text as well.
00:21:39.000 So, just by being aware of these conventions, we can say, oh, well, I know exactly what this text was trying to do because it has all these markers of a given genre.
00:21:47.000 And that's a big cue.
00:21:49.000 To helping us figure out what texts are trying to do.
00:21:52.000 And when people wrote on pottery, generally this was a little more ritual.
00:21:57.000 This was something that was intended to be like a votive offering, which might be an offering to a deity so that the deity will then bless you, or it might be something that people are intended to come in and read out loud so that they invoke the presence of the deity in the space.
00:22:14.000 And then the drawing the deity would also be a way of doing that.
00:22:17.000 So there are a lot of different reasons for what's going on.
00:22:20.000 And that's the big mystery.
00:22:21.000 What were they trying to accomplish?
00:22:23.000 And cattle worship was very common.
00:22:25.000 It was Choctaw Hyuk.
00:22:28.000 There was like the Hindus.
00:22:30.000 There's a lot of cattle worship.
00:22:31.000 There's worship of a lot of different animals or the sacralization of a lot of different animals in a lot of different places.
00:22:39.000 And this is probably drawing from Egyptian iconography.
00:22:43.000 So, yeah, the Sinai Peninsula is right in between Syria, Palestine, and Egypt.
00:22:50.000 And there was an awful lot of Egyptian influence on things.
00:22:54.000 So even if you look at, for instance, Hezekiah, there's a bulla that was discovered, which is something that was left from an impression, a signet ring or something like that, that has the name Hezekiah on it.
00:23:11.000 And there's an Egyptian drawing of a winged, I think it's a winged scarab or something like that, which is directly from Egypt because Israel was under Egyptian hegemony for a long, long time.
00:23:24.000 So it's right next door.
00:23:25.000 Yeah.
00:23:25.000 Yeah.
00:23:26.000 Yeah.
00:23:26.000 Yeah.
00:23:27.000 So.
00:23:28.000 You were talking about Jesus and the New Testament, and that some of it seems to have been like the way it was done to appease the people that lived in the same era?
00:23:42.000 Yeah.
00:23:43.000 Some of it was a way to, I think, make people feel better about themselves.
00:23:47.000 For instance, so the texts were written long after Jesus was dead.
00:23:52.000 The Gospels, Mark was probably written 69, 70, 71 ish CE.
00:23:58.000 Matthew's probably five, ten years after that.
00:24:00.000 Luke's probably five, ten years or more after that.
00:24:03.000 John's a little after that.
00:24:05.000 And at this time period, there's already a following that is developing.
00:24:09.000 And so the people who are writing these texts are writing them for a literary audience, but they also want them to speak to the experiences of the people who are followers of Jesus.
00:24:18.000 So for instance, there's a part where Jesus says, I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.
00:24:27.000 And I will set father against son and mother against daughter.
00:24:31.000 And all this kind of stuff.
00:24:32.000 And people have wondered, well, what on earth is going on here?
00:24:35.000 And there are scholars who suggest that the point of that would have been to make it sound like to people who are struggling with inner family relationships, you know, I'm a follower of Jesus now and I got kicked out of my house.
00:24:47.000 Or I'm a follower of Jesus now and I constantly fight with my wife or with my brother or something like that.
00:24:52.000 Am I doing something wrong?
00:24:53.000 And this text has Jesus saying, no, no, I came to cause that.
00:24:57.000 So that means things are working.
00:25:00.000 And that's a way to make people feel, okay, well, then I'm okay.
00:25:04.000 Because I got kicked out of my parents' house or something like that.
00:25:07.000 But isn't that crazy?
00:25:07.000 Someone putting words into Jesus' mouth just so that people of the time feel okay?
00:25:12.000 Aaron Powell, Jr.
00:25:13.000 I think that's probably an awful lot of what's going on.
00:25:16.000 It's either to make them feel okay or to try to push them to agree with living a certain way or something like that or try to make them feel like this is what's coming up for us.
00:25:29.000 Aaron Powell, Jr.
00:25:30.000 Which is a problem with taking everything literally and people deciding that all of it is the Word of God when some of it is just like, okay.
00:25:36.000 Would God really tell you to do that?
00:25:38.000 Like, why?
00:25:39.000 Why is God telling you to rape?
00:25:41.000 Why is God telling you to kill women and children?
00:25:44.000 Yeah, yeah.
00:25:45.000 That's something that.
00:25:46.000 Commanding you to.
00:25:48.000 Yeah, and people have been struggling with that for the entire history of the circulation of those texts.
00:25:52.000 And I think there are.
00:25:54.000 Yeah, the word of God thing is interesting because that phrase is never used anywhere in the Bible to refer to texts specifically as the texts that are in circulation.
00:26:06.000 So, word of God is always a reference to.
00:26:09.000 Just the message, however it's circulating, whether it's oral or whatever, or to Jesus.
00:26:14.000 In the New Testament, Jesus is the word.
00:26:16.000 But it's never used to refer to a specific textual manifestation of the message.
00:26:22.000 And so there's not really a case to make that any author of any text that's in the Bible used that phrase to refer to the scriptures or the Bible.
00:26:32.000 And so even in 1 Corinthians, in a couple of places, in Paul, he says, This is not coming from the Lord, this is just coming from me.
00:26:40.000 And then we take it and say, okay, wink, wink, we know what you mean.
00:26:44.000 Paul's a weird one.
00:26:45.000 Paul's a weird one.
00:26:46.000 The more I get into Paul, the more I'm like, this guy, first of all, killed a bunch of Christians, lit churches on fire, at least ordered the death of Christians.
00:26:56.000 Yeah, according to Paul.
00:26:58.000 And then became one.
00:26:59.000 And then says he met Jesus in a vision.
00:27:04.000 And then all the stuff written down, he also says that a lot of it is coming from him, but we attribute it to Jesus.
00:27:13.000 It's all, it gets super squirrely when you start reading Paul.
00:27:18.000 You're like, who the, what?
00:27:20.000 Well, here's the thing.
00:27:21.000 He never even met him?
00:27:23.000 Heck, 20 years later, he's reading all this?
00:27:25.000 And there are a couple of different stories about how exactly he did meet him.
00:27:28.000 What are the different ones?
00:27:31.000 Is the road to Damascus?
00:27:32.000 Well, yeah, it's the vision, but it's told in a couple of different ways.
00:27:37.000 You've got a couple of tellings of the story in Acts and in the Pauline literature.
00:27:41.000 It really has to do with who heard a voice or saw something or anything like that.
00:27:48.000 There are minor differences, but there are still some differences.
00:27:50.000 I think it's really interesting.
00:27:53.000 A lot of people treat all the Pauline texts as As equally one inspired and two from Paul, but scholars are in pretty widespread agreement that there are several of those texts that weren't written by Paul.
00:28:03.000 They were written decades after he was dead.
00:28:06.000 So 1st and 2nd Timothy and Titus are called the Pastoral Epistles, and they are widely agreed to have been written toward the end of the first century, beginning of the second century, maybe 30 years after Paul was dead or more.
00:28:06.000 Really?
00:28:06.000 Yeah.
00:28:20.000 Oh, how complicated.
00:28:20.000 And then you've got Colossians, 2nd Thessalonians.
00:28:24.000 And Ephesians are a little more debated, but there is a good solid core of scholars who would argue that they were not written by Paul.
00:28:35.000 And one of the things, one of the interesting things that happens when you divide up the letters between the genuine Pauline epistles and then what are called the disputed and then the spurious Pauline epistles is Paul's message in the genuine Pauline epistles is different from the message in the others.
00:28:53.000 And for instance, in the genuine Pauline epistles, Paul was like, you know, Jesus is coming back any day now.
00:28:59.000 Don't change your situation in life.
00:29:02.000 Don't get married if you're not married.
00:29:05.000 If you're married, don't get divorced.
00:29:07.000 And he suggests that everybody should be celibate, unless you just can't hack celibacy, in which case Even while married?
00:29:15.000 Because you're waiting for Jesus to return.
00:29:17.000 Because in this time period, I think Paul fancied himself a philosopher, but he's kind of cobbling together a bunch of different philosophical movements.
00:29:26.000 Where have we heard that before?
00:29:28.000 Where have we heard that before?
00:29:29.000 Somebody fancied themselves a philosopher?
00:29:31.000 Well, cobbling together things from different sources.
00:29:33.000 Oh, yeah.
00:29:34.000 That's how everybody does it.
00:29:35.000 Every guru of today.
00:29:35.000 Yeah, yeah.
00:29:36.000 But at the time, sexual desire was thought of as something that was part of the baser urges of the flesh.
00:29:43.000 And if you could overcome that, then you obviously were a real one.
00:29:47.000 Which is why Roman statues had little penises.
00:29:50.000 I'm sure that's the main reason.
00:29:51.000 Yeah, that's supposedly what it was.
00:29:54.000 I had a wonderful guide when I did a tour of the Vatican.
00:29:54.000 Really?
00:29:54.000 Yeah.
00:29:57.000 This guy who was a university professor.
00:30:01.000 Who he moonlights, you know, makes extra money in the summertime as a guide.
00:30:07.000 And he took us on this tour.
00:30:10.000 And this guy was fantastic.
00:30:12.000 And he loved that I was so into it.
00:30:13.000 So we had this great conversation.
00:30:14.000 And eventually I had to get to Little Dicks.
00:30:16.000 Like, why are these guys, they have these incredible bodies, but they have these tiny penises?
00:30:21.000 And he explained that it was like, that was gauche.
00:30:24.000 Like, you didn't want to have a big, giant dick.
00:30:26.000 A big, giant dick was like a symbol of a brutish, barbarian type person.
00:30:31.000 Better to depict these gods with tiny penises.
00:30:31.000 That was.
00:30:33.000 And then eventually they start covering them with leaves.
00:30:39.000 Yeah, yeah.
00:30:40.000 Well, and the early Greek and Roman gods, you know, they kind of went to town with the sexual stuff.
00:30:47.000 Well, it seems like they were getting their freak on quite a bit, those people.
00:30:52.000 Yeah, in a lot of different ways and with a lot of different species.
00:30:55.000 But anyway, Paul was, he suggests that, yeah, even married folks should just avoid it.
00:30:59.000 And we see this in Matthew as well.
00:31:03.000 There's a part in Matthew in 19.
00:31:06.000 And we see this in Matthew as well.
00:31:08.000 There's a part in Matthew in 19 when he's talking about divorce and then his followers are like, it would be better for somebody not to get married.
00:31:16.000 And then he goes, hey man, there are those who are born eunuchs, there are those who are made eunuchs by men, and then there are those who make themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven.
00:31:25.000 And he says, that's a difficult saying, but for those who can accept it, they should accept it.
00:31:31.000 Basically saying, the higher law is to be celibate because they thought Jesus was coming back so soon that having a kid would be a waste of time.
00:31:41.000 And so there was no other reason for intercourse, really.
00:31:44.000 And so the idea was, okay, be celibate.
00:31:47.000 And Paul says, you know, if you can't hack it, then go ahead and have occasional sex with your spouse, but it should be basically for keeping down the urges.
00:31:56.000 Because if trying to remain celibate is just driving you nuts, the risk that you might engage in some kind of sexual immorality is so great that you need to have that little valve to.
00:32:12.000 Keep down the earth.
00:32:13.000 Imagine if you're on death's door and you listen to him and you decide to stay celibate and you're like, Jesus didn't even come back.
00:32:19.000 Yeah.
00:32:20.000 Yeah.
00:32:20.000 Look at all the sex I missed.
00:32:22.000 Well, and you kind of see, yeah, that would certainly be on the list of regrets.
00:32:26.000 This is the problem with not just biblical, but contemporary people that claim to know what's happening.
00:32:36.000 We're all lost in this weird world that we're living in where there's so much uncertainty and there's so many different versions of truth.
00:32:45.000 In terms of the origin of mankind and the universe.
00:32:49.000 We want someone to come along and say, I know, I know.
00:32:53.000 It's so compelling when someone does.
00:32:55.000 When they say it with authority, when they say it with confidence, it's like, oh, finally, a guy who knows.
00:33:01.000 This is how all cults get started.
00:33:03.000 This is how everything.
00:33:06.000 I mean, this is how a lot of political leaders wind up taking control.
00:33:10.000 It's like someone who pretends to know and has this deep understanding that's far beyond anything you're ever going to have.
00:33:19.000 Trust me, you got to stay celibate.
00:33:20.000 Jesus is on the way.
00:33:22.000 Yeah.
00:33:23.000 And that didn't really work out too well.
00:33:24.000 It never works out.
00:33:25.000 They're never right, which is so crazy that people keep listening to them.
00:33:30.000 And this is one of the things that scholars see when they separate out the genuine Pauline epistles from the later ones, because in the later ones, you have Paul saying stuff like, oh, there's going to be a delay.
00:33:43.000 Jesus is stuck in traffic.
00:33:44.000 Yeah.
00:33:46.000 And this is because it's written by folks who are, you know, they're decades down the road.
00:33:50.000 Now it's like, if we don't have kids.
00:33:52.000 Our movement is dying out.
00:33:54.000 So we kind of got to have kids.
00:33:56.000 And so you've got one of these spurious Pauline epistles that say, Women will be saved in childbearing.
00:34:03.000 So now it's like your salvation is dependent on you having kids, even though the real Paul was like, Put it away.
00:34:10.000 Now we're living celibate lives now.
00:34:15.000 And so you have, and this pops up in Matthew as well, and elsewhere, where we've got this what they call delay of the parousia.
00:34:24.000 Or the second coming, we expected it any day now.
00:34:26.000 Turns out it might be a little longer.
00:34:28.000 Traffic's bad.
00:34:30.000 And you have this man of sin that's supposed to show up, or there's supposed to be this falling away, or there's supposed to be something that gets in the way and that causes a delay in Jesus' return.
00:34:41.000 And 2,000 years down the road, we're still wondering when that delay is going to.
00:34:45.000 So we get to the oldest stuff.
00:34:47.000 We get to the Old Testament.
00:34:50.000 If we get to Genesis, what are the oldest versions of that story?
00:34:57.000 Is it the Anumer Ish?
00:34:59.000 So, there are a bunch of different versions of Enuma Elish, but we probably go back to Sumerian stuff because you actually have these king lists from long, long ago written in Sumerian.
00:35:14.000 There's no flood story yet in these king lists, but they talk about these kings that range for 10,000 years at a time.
00:35:21.000 What's your take on all that?
00:35:22.000 My take on all that?
00:35:23.000 Yeah.
00:35:24.000 These are traditions.
00:35:25.000 You see a lot of different traditions that develop in the ancient world to account for.
00:35:30.000 How creation happened.
00:35:33.000 The weirdest one has got to be there's an Egyptian one where the head god masturbated all of existence.
00:35:41.000 So that's a great one for some bedtime reading.
00:35:45.000 It's pretty short, but there are just these texts are intended to serve purposes for these authors long, long ago.
00:35:54.000 And this is when writing is just starting to come to be.
00:35:57.000 Right.
00:35:58.000 And so it hadn't been around for a very long time.
00:36:00.000 You don't have a lot of.
00:36:01.000 Mythical narratives and things like that.
00:36:04.000 But you have these poems that tell stories and that talk about the reign of kings, and that's political power.
00:36:10.000 But the weird thing about the Kings List is the older ones are the ones that live forever.
00:36:14.000 They live in enormous lifespans.
00:36:15.000 And then when it gets to not, you know, closer to contemporary times, Yeah, their rules become less and less until they're more human.
00:36:26.000 And the same thing is in Genesis.
00:36:27.000 And it happens in the later versions of the story, they go from 10,000 years to just a few thousand years.
00:36:33.000 But in one of the secondary versions of the king list, suddenly there's a flood that happens.
00:36:40.000 Trevor Burrus, secondary version.
00:36:41.000 Aaron Ross Powell, yeah.
00:36:42.000 So it's something that's added to the king list.
00:36:44.000 It's not in our oldest king list.
00:36:46.000 Trevor Burrus, do we know when that was added roughly?
00:36:47.000 Aaron Ross Powell, we probably have a rough estimate of the date.
00:36:52.000 I don't remember off the top of my head.
00:36:53.000 It's probably somewhere in the early third millennium BCE.
00:36:56.000 So maybe somewhere mid 2000s BCE.
00:37:00.000 I don't remember.
00:37:01.000 Aaron Ross Powell, so it's probably contemporary to the oral traditions of Genesis?
00:37:05.000 So, I think the oral traditions of Genesis actually are much later than that.
00:37:10.000 Yeah.
00:37:10.000 Really?
00:37:10.000 Because Genesis was probably written between around the 8th century BCE down to the 5th century BCE.
00:37:17.000 And a lot of it is riffing on the literature that's circulating within Babylon during the exile, or it's literature that's circulating within Assyria when Assyria is beaten up on Israel.
00:37:34.000 And so, for instance, the Tower of Babel.
00:37:37.000 That's a famous story from Genesis.
00:37:39.000 There's a tower called the Tower of Etem-Ananke that is just outside of Babylon that was famous because it was built by – I want to say Old Babylonian.
00:37:53.000 Don't quote me on that though.
00:37:55.000 But it was later destroyed when the Assyrians came in to take over.
00:37:59.000 They kind of decommissioned it and destroyed it partly.
00:38:04.000 And then for like 80 years, another Assyrian emperor had a restoration.
00:38:08.000 Was trying to rebuild the tower, but it took forever.
00:38:14.000 It took like 80 years.
00:38:15.000 That was right in the 8th century.
00:38:18.000 There are a lot of scholars who suggest that the story of this tower that was supposed to be built to heaven that was left unfinished is a reflection of the unfinished tower of Eteman Anki.
00:38:30.000 That would put it in the right date.
00:38:32.000 There's also this problem when we look at historical narratives in the Hebrew Bible.
00:38:37.000 They're written in ancient Hebrew and a somewhat developed form of ancient Hebrew.
00:38:43.000 We can chart. the developments of the Semitic languages fairly well.
00:38:46.000 languages fairly well.
00:38:49.000 There's no historical narrative prose in any alphabetic script, any language that was written in an alphabetic script until the middle of the 9th century BCE.
00:39:00.000 That first happens in Moabites and Aramaic and some other languages like that.
00:39:07.000 Most likely, our ancient narrative prose in Biblical Hebrew was written around that time or shortly after.
00:39:15.000 The stuff that's older than that is written in poetry.
00:39:18.000 And so the oldest parts of the Hebrew Bible are not the creation account in Genesis.
00:39:24.000 There are some poems that we find in like Judges 5.
00:39:28.000 So this is a fascinating story about Deborah, the general who goes and defeats Sisera.
00:39:35.000 And we have stories in Exodus 15, the Song of the Sea.
00:39:38.000 Some scholars think that's a very, very old poem, which is basically a shortened version of the Exodus story.
00:39:44.000 And then Genesis 49 has some blessings that Jacob gives to his children.
00:39:48.000 That might be really, really old.
00:39:50.000 And Psalm 68.
00:39:52.000 There are a handful of poems that may go back to around 1000 BC.
00:39:57.000 So when Genesis is talking about the things that we think are related to Enuma Elish, the closest connections are actually two versions of that story that were in circulation in Babylon around 600 BCE.
00:40:13.000 So that's probably where Genesis is getting that from, not directly from Sumerian tablets, not directly from oral traditions that are 1000 years older.
00:40:25.000 The scholars who are looking at that, I think, have made a good case that the closest connections are 8th to 6th century BCE.
00:40:33.000 That's probably where the traditions that were recorded in Genesis were mainly borrowed or mainly adopted and adapted to serve the interests of the Judeans who were around in that time period.
00:40:45.000 Aaron Ross Powell So, what is the oldest creation story that we're aware of?
00:40:49.000 Aaron Ross Powell I think it's probably got to be an Egyptian one.
00:40:55.000 It's either Sumerian or Egyptian.
00:40:57.000 That's the two places where writing was invented.
00:41:04.000 I would have to go back and look.
00:41:05.000 There's a wonderful set of texts called the Contexts of Scripture, a three volume set published by this very expensive publisher called Brill.
00:41:15.000 They have translations of all of the texts that we have from ancient Egypt, from ancient Anatolia, from ancient Assyria, Babylon, from the cultures of ancient Canaan that are not in the Bible.
00:41:27.000 And so they have one of the volumes, the first third of it is creation accounts.
00:41:32.000 And so it may be the masturbation one.
00:41:36.000 I can't say for sure.
00:41:37.000 I don't remember off the top of my head.
00:41:40.000 But that's not the OG.
00:41:44.000 It could be.
00:41:45.000 It could be.
00:41:46.000 Well, the Egyptian language by itself is very bizarre because it kind of emerges out of nowhere.
00:41:51.000 Like hieroglyphs emerge sort of fully formed.
00:41:57.000 There's a development in the way hieroglyphs are used.
00:42:01.000 But we first start seeing inscriptions popping up, like monumental inscriptions.
00:42:06.000 Most of the early writing probably took place on materials that deteriorated really quickly.
00:42:12.000 And so what we have is the stuff that was written in stone, which is where the language has got to be a little more developed for us to start taking all day to inscribe something in stone.
00:42:24.000 So I don't think there's a good case to make that it just popped out of nowhere.
00:42:30.000 The ancient alien stuff.
00:42:32.000 Is fun, but we don't have a lot of evidence that gets us to that being really even a plausible solution to the problem.
00:42:43.000 There is definitely a mystery about why, in similar time periods, people in different parts of the world came up with very similar ideas all at the same time.
00:42:54.000 That might have something to do with the evolution of the brain or something like that.
00:42:59.000 It's also, we're probably underestimating the amount of travel people were capable of doing back then.
00:43:04.000 I think so.
00:43:04.000 Yeah, I think so.
00:43:05.000 But the writing seems to develop from receipts or from counting.
00:43:11.000 And this is your receipt for how many goats you bought or whatever.
00:43:16.000 And so as your needs develop, in your economy is growing, I think you begin to develop labels for things, you begin to develop characters for things, and then it goes from there.
00:43:30.000 There are a bunch of really good academic discussions about the origins of language and the origins of the alphabet, and even the stuff that we see-ancient Hebrew ultimately derives from Egyptian.
00:43:42.000 Really?
00:43:43.000 Yeah, in the Sinai.
00:43:45.000 That is where you have we have some inscriptions from around 1700 to 1900 BCE where they look like Egyptian hieroglyphs, but they're not doing what Egyptian hieroglyphs do because they are either syllabic or ideographic or logographic, where one sign represents a syllable, so a consonant and a vowel, or one sign represents a word or one sign represents an idea.
00:44:12.000 And they change them so that each sign represents just a single sound.
00:44:19.000 And the sound is whatever sound is at the start of the word that the symbol represents.
00:44:24.000 So, for instance, the word for house, bait, and that starts with a b.
00:44:29.000 And so, if you drew a house, that meant the b sound.
00:44:32.000 And this is the development of the alphabets, because to learn ancient Egyptian, you had to memorize hundreds and hundreds of signs.
00:44:40.000 And to learn Sumerian or Akkadian or something like that, hundreds of signs.
00:44:46.000 But an alphabet is 22 to 30 letters.
00:44:50.000 So, it's a lot easier to memorize.
00:44:52.000 And then that becomes that gets taken to Phoenicia, and from Phoenicia it gets spread all over the place.
00:44:59.000 And so, apart from Hangul, which is the Korean script, I think virtually every other alphabet on earth is descended from the Phoenician.
00:45:08.000 Well, the Korean script is fairly recent, right?
00:45:11.000 Aaron Ross Powell, Jr.
00:45:12.000 Yeah, yeah, fairly recent.
00:45:13.000 And they take a few different symbols and they group them together to create syllables.
00:45:17.000 But each symbol on its own represents a sound very similar to the way.
00:45:24.000 Our alphabet works.
00:45:25.000 I don't know much about Korean, but I've heard it described as the most complete language.
00:45:30.000 Like it's the most structurally logical language.
00:45:33.000 There are ways that I think it is.
00:45:37.000 There are other ways that a language like Russian might be more systematic, or even ways like ancient Latin might be more systematic.
00:45:45.000 So when you started learning religion, we started studying religion, did you start studying languages concurrently?
00:45:53.000 How did you do it?
00:45:56.000 So, I joined the LDS Church when I was 20 years old.
00:46:02.000 And a year later, I went to serve a two year proselytizing mission in Uruguay.
00:46:06.000 And I fell in love with studying the Bible when I was doing that.
00:46:11.000 I loved the stories.
00:46:12.000 I loved learning about the history, the culture.
00:46:14.000 And I wanted to better understand the languages so I could try to engage the texts as they were originally written.
00:46:23.000 So, I tried to start teaching myself Hebrew when I was down there.
00:46:26.000 I didn't have a ton of time and I wasn't very good at it.
00:46:28.000 It's a task.
00:46:28.000 But when I.
00:46:29.000 Yeah, it's a tall order.
00:46:30.000 And when I came home, I. found out that you could get a degree in biblical studies and be a Bible scholar.
00:46:38.000 Be a Bible scholar, and I was like, that would be about the coolest career in the world for me.
00:46:43.000 And so, I went to school to do that.
00:46:45.000 I wanted to learn ancient Hebrew, I wanted to learn ancient Greek, I wanted to learn about the literature, I wanted to learn about the history, I wanted to learn about the archaeology.
00:46:52.000 And so, I started off not really having a narrow focus, but just I want to try and get as much of it in as I could.
00:46:58.000 And over the course of getting these degrees, you know, you kind of have to narrow your focus on stuff.
00:47:04.000 And so, as I progressed, I decided I wanted to learn.
00:47:10.000 Not only what was going on with the languages, but I wanted to focus on how people thought about God and gods.
00:47:16.000 And so my PhD is actually using biblical studies and then something called the cognitive science of religion.
00:47:23.000 I put those two together to try to figure out what we can know about how the authors of the Hebrew Bible would have thought about and interacted with gods as they understood them.
00:47:36.000 And that's using a lot of experimental research.
00:47:40.000 On living informants, so interviews and experiments and things like that to figure out how the brain works and how we come up with ideas about deities, ideas about rituals, ideas about religious identity and stuff like that.
00:47:53.000 So I find that fascinating.
00:47:55.000 So I would say my main focus is now on conceptualizations of deity, of scripture, and religious identity.
00:48:04.000 And cognitive science of religion is one of the main tools that I use.
00:48:08.000 But yeah, it all started with having to learn the languages.
00:48:11.000 What's such an enormous field of study?
00:48:13.000 Yeah.
00:48:14.000 There is so much to learn.
00:48:16.000 Especially when you're talking about these different translations and different languages, which is what I've always felt like is the weirdest part about all this it's very difficult to translate languages to something that makes sense in whatever language you're currently using.
00:48:33.000 There's certain concepts that we use that if you tried to use them, you know, and if you try to, like, I'm sure you've seen Russian translated to English and you're like, What are they saying?
00:48:47.000 It gets weird.
00:48:48.000 Yeah.
00:48:49.000 Because it's not.
00:48:51.000 Languages aren't.
00:48:52.000 It's not direct.
00:48:54.000 It's not like, oh, this is their word for cow.
00:48:56.000 This is their word for drive.
00:48:58.000 This is their word for truck.
00:48:59.000 Oh, the cow drove a truck.
00:49:01.000 It's not that simple.
00:49:02.000 It's dependent.
00:49:03.000 Like the way they talk about things is very different.
00:49:06.000 The way to describe time is very different.
00:49:09.000 Yeah.
00:49:10.000 And that.
00:49:10.000 Yeah.
00:49:11.000 When you get into more minority languages, languages that are spoken and, you know, Tiny little islands like Yap or Kiribati or something like that.
00:49:21.000 It can get very, very alien to someone who has only spoken English their entire life.
00:49:28.000 Because learning Spanish, like there are ways it's difficult.
00:49:32.000 Learning any language is difficult.
00:49:34.000 But there are a lot of ways it is very, very close to English, including even some of the words sound very similar.
00:49:39.000 But there are other languages that you learn that are just, yeah, you have to restructure how you.
00:49:47.000 Are thinking about things and how you communicate things.
00:49:49.000 It's not just like in German, oh, you've got to put all the verbs at the end.
00:49:53.000 There are very, very different ways to go about.
00:49:56.000 So, how complicated is that when you're reading an English translation of the Bible?
00:50:01.000 That's when things must get very strange if you're - especially Old Testament, right?
00:50:07.000 Or even crazier, Dead Sea Scrolls, right?
00:50:11.000 So, you're going Aramaic to English.
00:50:13.000 Aaron Powell, Jr.: Yeah.
00:50:17.000 Think that it's a simple matter translating from ancient Hebrew, ancient Greek into English.
00:50:23.000 And they imagine that because they have an English translation, they have all the insights they need.
00:50:30.000 Need.
00:50:31.000 And this is why a lot of people will go out and they'll get an interlinear or they'll go on a website that provides the Hebrew to English or something like that and imagine that they now understand.
00:50:41.000 When the reality is that there is a lot more under the hood of that relationship between the Hebrew and the English translation that they don't have any idea about.
00:50:49.000 And so there's a saying that somebody who goes online and uses an interlinear or something like that, they know just enough Greek to be dangerous.
00:50:59.000 Meaning they really imagine that they know a lot more than they do.
00:51:03.000 And when they go out and try to To use that knowledge to try to go make videos on social media or something like that, they end up stepping in it because they really don't know what they're talking about.
00:51:12.000 Or the main reason I'm on social media and the main thing I'm trying to combat, they will spread misinformation falsehoods that other people are going to eat up because they might have a platform with millions of followers.
00:51:24.000 That sounds like me.
00:51:28.000 I won't say too much about the misinformation, but yeah, no, there's a lot of it out there.
00:51:34.000 I try not to be someone who does that because I can't be a No, you're really good at it.
00:51:37.000 You can't be.
00:51:38.000 Breaking down where things go wrong with translations as well.
00:51:43.000 Well, I appreciate that.
00:51:44.000 And I can't be a specialist in all things, which is why I rely on the consensus of the academic world.
00:51:50.000 Do you speak ancient Hebrew?
00:51:51.000 Nobody speaks ancient Hebrew.
00:51:54.000 It's not a spoken language.
00:51:56.000 Obviously, modern Hebrew is spoken, but it's not a language that anyone would ever grow up learning by speaking with their mother.
00:52:04.000 This episode is brought to you by Call of Duty.
00:52:07.000 Modern Warfare 4 is coming, and they're going all in on this one.
00:52:12.000 The kind of missions that make you go, dude, did they really just do that?
00:52:17.000 Set during a full scale North Korean invasion of South Korea, expect a real boots on the ground experience as young South Korean recruits fighting to protect their homeland and North Korean forces, hunting traitors, interrogating civilians, and more.
00:52:33.000 Modern Warfare 4 launches October 23rd.
00:52:36.000 Pre order digitally for early access to the campaign or pick up your physical disc on day one.
00:52:43.000 Visit Call of Duty.com for more.
00:52:45.000 Rated M. For mature.
00:52:47.000 Is there a way to learn how to speak?
00:52:49.000 Yeah, people.
00:52:50.000 Yeah, you have to reconstruct some stuff.
00:52:53.000 And so there are absolutely like speakers of modern Hebrew can look at a text and read it perfectly fluently.
00:53:00.000 To understand it, they have to have a knowledge of the difference between modern Hebrew and ancient Hebrew.
00:53:06.000 But they're saying it the correct way?
00:53:09.000 Mostly.
00:53:09.000 There are some differences in the way they pronounce things anciently from the way they pronounce things today.
00:53:15.000 But most scholars who are looking at the Biblical Hebrew, ancient Hebrew, are going to adopt a modern pronunciation system.
00:53:23.000 So there are absolutely scholars out there who advocate for or have a reconstructed way of pronouncing ancient Hebrew.
00:53:33.000 But for the most part, if I go to a conference and I read a text in Hebrew, I'm going to use something approximating a modern Hebrew pronunciation.
00:53:39.000 And I'm not awesome at it, but someone who speaks modern Hebrew should understand what I'm saying.
00:53:46.000 But I read it fairly well.
00:53:49.000 It's been a while since.
00:53:51.000 I've got a translation of the Hebrew Bible I'm working on.
00:53:55.000 I haven't been able to touch it for almost two years now.
00:53:58.000 So my Hebrew ebbs and flows depending on how frequently I'm in the text working on translation and stuff like that.
00:54:07.000 But yeah, I'm better at Hebrew than I am at Greek.
00:54:11.000 But there are a handful of languages we have to get some competency in to do this.
00:54:16.000 Aramaic is one of them.
00:54:18.000 Another fun one is called Ugaritic, which is.
00:54:19.000 Considered somewhat of a precursor to Hebrew.
00:54:24.000 It was spoken a little further north on the Syrian coast.
00:54:27.000 You've never heard of Ugaritic?
00:54:29.000 You've never heard of Ugaritic?
00:54:30.000 No.
00:54:30.000 This is a fascinating story.
00:54:33.000 1929, a guy is plowing a field along the coast of Syria and he hits a big rock that he can't move and he digs it up and basically discovers an entire ancient city.
00:54:47.000 Calls out the archaeologists, they all come descend on this field and they discover the ancient city of Ugarit, which we knew from some texts that referred to this city called Ugarit.
00:55:00.000 Around a thousand or so texts, but nobody recognized the language because it was written in cuneiform, but there were only 30 cuneiform signs.
00:55:08.000 So that means it's got to be alphabetic and not the other way they use cuneiform signs.
00:55:15.000 And they decided, okay, the most common Semitic consonant is mem, the equivalent of our M.
00:55:22.000 And they said, so let's take the most common sign that we see and let's designate that mem.
00:55:28.000 And then let's look at all the two letter words.
00:55:29.000 And there are only a handful of words that can be two letters and have.
00:55:33.000 The mem in one position or another, and let's try to decode from there this language.
00:55:39.000 And now we have, we've decoded Ugaritic, and now we, a lot of people who go and learn Biblical Hebrew and Aramaic will also learn Ugaritic because some of these mythical texts mention things that are in the Bible.
00:55:53.000 And so they talk about deities like El and Baal and Asherah.
00:55:58.000 And so Asherah, the one right there.
00:56:01.000 And there are some things that are in there that help us better understand Biblical Hebrew, there are some things that are in there that help us understand.
00:56:08.000 Some of the cultic rituals that would go on in relation to El and Baal and Asherah.
00:56:14.000 And there's even one text that's almost directly quoted in the Bible.
00:56:20.000 And the thing is, Ugarit was destroyed around 1200 BCE, so with what's called the Late Bronze Age Collapse.
00:56:30.000 And there's a wonderful book by Eric Klein, 1177 BC.
00:56:34.000 Have you ever heard that book title?
00:56:36.000 Phenomenal book on how the Late Bronze Age Collapse happened.
00:56:41.000 So, the destruction of Ugarit happens before the invention of Hebrew.
00:56:45.000 So, Hebrew didn't even exist in this time period.
00:56:49.000 But this helps us recover what the languages that were being spoken in that region were like as Hebrew began to develop.
00:56:56.000 But there's a passage, there's a reference to Baal fighting a deity named Mot, and Mot means death.
00:57:02.000 So, this is the god of death that's fighting Baal, who is the storm god.
00:57:07.000 And Mot is like, I know you've won some battles in the past, you're going to lose this one.
00:57:12.000 But he says, I know you slew Lotan, which is the Ugaritic version of Leviathan, the wriggling serpent, the twisting serpent, the dragon with seven heads.
00:57:23.000 And what's funny is in Isaiah 27, 1, we have Isaiah talking about Adonai, the God of Israel, and says, On that day, so now it's off in the future, on that day, you will strike Leviathan, the wriggling serpent, Leviathan, the twisting serpent, the dragon that lives in the sea.
00:57:44.000 And so the words for wriggling and twisting serpent are identical to the Ugaritic, and lotan and leviathan are both the same word, just in two different languages.
00:57:55.000 And so this passage in Isaiah was probably written somewhere before 700 BCE, but that's coming 500 years after the Ugaritic text that says almost the exact same thing.
00:58:09.000 Wow.
00:58:10.000 So it's not that Isaiah had access to this text and was quoting it, but it was probably kind of a poetic saying.
00:58:18.000 That was just transmitted all around the area, and at some point Isaiah decided to write it down.
00:58:26.000 And while the Ugaritic one makes reference to seven heads, Isaiah doesn't say anything about seven heads, but we do have in Psalm 74 a reference to Leviathan's multiple heads, that God crushed the heads of Leviathan and the seven-headed serpent dragon is kind of a pretty common motif in that time period.
00:58:43.000 Just recently in a Tel Hatzor in a little north in Israel, they discovered a little inscription with a drawing that shows a warrior fighting a seven-headed serpent dragon.
00:58:58.000 So, the Ugaritic literature helps us an awful lot with understanding what was going on before the Bible happened, but also helps us better understand the Hebrew of the Bible and also the relationship of these gods to one another and the tradition that was inherited by the Israelites and then how they engaged with it as they passed it on down the line historically.
00:59:23.000 Aaron Powell Why so many references to dragons?
00:59:27.000 So, they didn't have a word for lizard, right?
00:59:29.000 And they didn't have a word for reptile.
00:59:32.000 And dinosaurs.
00:59:34.000 That was very contemporary.
00:59:36.000 Just even the description of it in that way.
00:59:40.000 But the term dragon referred to all of these scaly beasts, right?
00:59:45.000 Yeah, it was all a crocodile.
00:59:49.000 Yeah, it was a sea monster.
00:59:51.000 The thing is, they were very conscious of the ever present threat of chaos, and particularly in the waters.
01:00:00.000 So the land was safe, the waters were dangerous.
01:00:02.000 Right.
01:00:03.000 And the chaos of the waters became kind of personified as a deity who could be represented as a dragon, just because that's where the sea monsters live.
01:00:16.000 That's where the giant fish and the alligators and stuff like that.
01:00:20.000 And so you get traditions that develop about the monster that lives in the sea, and then our god tames that monster as a way to show that our god has power over chaos, our god can bring order to chaos.
01:00:36.000 And you talked about creation stories earlier.
01:00:38.000 A lot of the original creation stories were mainly about overcoming the chaos to create order.
01:00:43.000 Order is what allows us to live in harmony.
01:00:45.000 Order is what allows civilization to develop.
01:00:48.000 Order is what we're going for.
01:00:50.000 So God is the one that brings that order.
01:00:52.000 And so the battle between chaos and order becomes a battle between a dragon and our deity, who is a warrior who is going to protect us.
01:01:01.000 Aaron Powell, Jr.
01:01:02.000 How much of these stories do you think the way they're compiled is to give structure to civilization?
01:01:08.000 And to establish rules in order for people to live together harmoniously.
01:01:13.000 Older, wiser people realize these folks have to have something to believe in.
01:01:18.000 One of the best ways to get a hold of this is to say someone's watching all the time.
01:01:23.000 Fly in the sky.
01:01:23.000 Yeah, you touched on a couple of different things because someone's watching all the time is definitely a central feature of how scholars think that religion dominated the development of civilization.
01:01:37.000 And there's a wonderful book by a scholar named Ara Noren Sion called Big Gods, which is all about this.
01:01:45.000 But the idea there is that gods develop in a variety of different ways, but it's rooted in the fact that our minds, because evolution has conditioned us to be very sensitive to the presence of agents and agency in the world around us.
01:02:02.000 Anciently, the primate that interpreted the rustling in the bushes as something that might have teeth rather than as just the wind survived longer.
01:02:11.000 Than the one who didn't.
01:02:13.000 Who didn't.
01:02:13.000 And so our minds became very, very sensitive to the presence of agency in the world around us.
01:02:18.000 And so anyone who's ever watched a horror movie and then has gone up the basement stairs a little quicker than normal, or you don't close your eyes at night because you feel like there's something there, that is a product of this evolutionarily installed sensitivity to agency.
01:02:35.000 And as this kind of plays out through human sociality, we curate relationships with deceased relatives.
01:02:47.000 We interpret certain events as the work of some kind of entity that we can't see, whether an animal or something more human like that.
01:02:56.000 And one of the things that interactions with these entities then allows us to do is it allows us to suggest there is an eye in the sky.
01:03:07.000 There is someone out there who is, the phrase is, covertly monitoring us.
01:03:13.000 And once you become in charge of the relationship between the people and the covert monitor, You then have an awful lot of power to say, well, it turns out we're all supposed to do this, and the deity is watching us, and anybody who is not doing this is going to be punished by the deity, and that exerts a lot of influence over people.
01:03:34.000 But it also allows societies to grow and get larger and more complex without descending into chaos because we have kind of this social superstructure that allows us to trust other people that we may not know.
01:03:50.000 This is one of the weird things about.
01:03:52.000 Human evolution is if you're in a family, you know your family, your kin are important to you.
01:03:58.000 And so you can cooperate with your kin.
01:04:00.000 But if you happen to run into somebody that you don't know, you have no idea if they're going to kill you or what.
01:04:07.000 And as societies grow beyond kinship units, you need signs and signals to be able to let other people know that you're okay.
01:04:17.000 We're part of the same social group.
01:04:19.000 We can trust each other.
01:04:20.000 And so these days, You know, it's things like shaking somebody's hand might be a way to do that.
01:04:26.000 Wearing a cross.
01:04:27.000 Wearing a cross is a way to, it's called costly signaling.
01:04:30.000 It's a way to incur some kind of cost in order to signal to others that you are part of the in group.
01:04:38.000 But these rituals go far beyond religious things, just even secularly.
01:04:43.000 There are a lot of things that we expect in a normal interaction with a stranger.
01:04:47.000 You expect things.
01:04:48.000 Good morning.
01:04:48.000 Good morning.
01:04:49.000 Shaking of the hand.
01:04:49.000 How are you doing?
01:04:50.000 I'm looking you in the eye.
01:04:52.000 I'm doing all the things to let you know that I can be trusted.
01:04:55.000 And so that's kind of an outcome of just being a part of a human society.
01:05:02.000 And gods, these covert monitors, are very effective rule setters, only they're not there to directly set the rules.
01:05:11.000 Somebody has to mediate between the deity and the people.
01:05:15.000 And that's where we get religious experts and we get priests and we get things like that.
01:05:21.000 And so, you know, it would be the elders in very, very archaic human societies who would be the ones.
01:05:27.000 To say, these are the stories that we're going to tell, that we're going to share, so that our kids grow up adopting these expectations about how they live their life and who the good guys are and who the bad guys are.
01:05:41.000 And that's one of the big problems in this empathy is something that we develop in human evolution, but empathy frequently only goes so far.
01:05:50.000 There's frequently a boundary to empathy, and that's called parochial empathy.
01:05:54.000 I'm very empathetic for anyone in my in group.
01:05:57.000 Their pain is my pain.
01:05:59.000 I see that pain, I feel that pain.
01:06:02.000 Somebody who I perceive to be the other, frequently I'm not going to have any empathy for.
01:06:06.000 In fact, it may make me feel good.
01:06:08.000 Which is very convenient during war.
01:06:09.000 Yeah.
01:06:09.000 Exactly.
01:06:10.000 Exactly.
01:06:11.000 Yeah.
01:06:12.000 And that's one of the reasons that empathy, you know, we hear a lot about toxic empathy these days, or at least I do because the algorithm hates me.
01:06:21.000 But the idea that we shouldn't extend our empathy beyond a particular in group boundary is the most toxic kind of empathy.
01:06:32.000 Right.
01:06:33.000 Because that is the empathy that others someone else and says, no, I care about my people.
01:06:40.000 I dislike or am apathetic to someone who's not part of the in group.
01:06:46.000 It's so weird because that extends to, well, in this country particularly, it extends to ideologies and politics.
01:06:52.000 And to the point where left versus right, one is the enemy depending on which side you're on, and they need to be eliminated.
01:06:59.000 Yeah, and the more you can dehumanize them and other them and make it seem like they are just so alien and so corrupt, the more you can do that, the easier it is to justify.
01:07:10.000 Not just treating them bad, not just Voting for the other guy, but even imprisoning them.
01:07:16.000 Trevor Burrus Or celebrating their death.
01:07:17.000 Trevor Burrus Being Charlie Kirk.
01:07:19.000 That's a wonderful example.
01:07:19.000 Trevor Burrus Yeah.
01:07:21.000 Something just atrocious that happened.
01:07:23.000 Nobody deserves that kind of treatment.
01:07:26.000 Trevor Burrus In your town.
01:07:28.000 Trevor Burrus But a little south of my town.
01:07:30.000 Trevor Burrus Your fault.
01:07:31.000 I was actually on the golf course and I got a text from somebody when that happened.
01:07:34.000 Wow.
01:07:34.000 And I just got a chill.
01:07:36.000 But yeah, this is one of the outcomes of just being human is that we tend to draw a line around those.
01:07:46.000 Who congregate around the social interaction or the social identities that are most important to us.
01:07:52.000 That's what politics is frequently trying to exploit.
01:07:56.000 That's why the more we can paint somebody on the other side of the aisle as so other as to be evil and even not human, the easier it is to justify torturing them, killing them, a genocide.
01:08:10.000 The easier that becomes.
01:08:14.000 I think of Toxic empathy as parochial empathy rather than the global empathy that I think we should all be striving for, which is a phenomenally difficult thing to do and it's phenomenally complex.
01:08:25.000 But yeah, the more we can humanize people, I think the more we can learn to get along.
01:08:32.000 That's what allowed human civilization to flourish.
01:08:34.000 In fact, I'll share one more detail about this.
01:08:38.000 Have you ever heard of Shannadar I?
01:08:40.000 I think so.
01:08:42.000 So it's an ancient Neanderthal.
01:08:46.000 It's a skull and a few other scattered bones.
01:08:51.000 And the skull shows some deformities that indicate that this was a person who was profoundly deaf, probably mostly blind as well, and had other disabilities that would have made it so they could not have survived very long.
01:09:07.000 But the skull aged to pretty old age for a Neanderthal, which indicates that that was only possible if they had a social support group around them.
01:09:20.000 That did things for them that they couldn't do for themselves.
01:09:24.000 And it almost certainly would have been kind of a social in group, so it's not a lesson about global empathy.
01:09:31.000 But if we understand humanity to be defined by, and I don't like definitions, but to be defined by the way we're most different from the animals that are closest to us, I think sacrificing our own efforts, time, resources, things like that, to care for someone who can't care for themselves, I think if.
01:09:54.000 That's about the closest I think we can get to a necessary and sufficient feature of what it means to be human.
01:10:02.000 And one of the most universally admired qualities.
01:10:03.000 Most universally admired qualities.
01:10:06.000 Amongst, I think, all cultures.
01:10:06.000 Yeah.
01:10:08.000 Yeah.
01:10:09.000 And this is something that we believe these ancient Neanderthal remains preserve in the injuries and the disabilities that are very clearly present in that individual.
01:10:24.000 So, you could say Chanadar 1 is the oldest human if you wanted to, because I think it shows that this was someone who grew up in a society that was like, we're going to take care of you.
01:10:36.000 You can't do these things for you.
01:10:38.000 We'll take that burden on ourselves.
01:10:40.000 Well, we have some very weird ideas of what Neanderthals were and how intelligent they are.
01:10:46.000 Their brains were larger than ours, which is really weird.
01:10:50.000 And they keep finding older hominins that have larger brains than us.
01:10:56.000 The latest one is this one from China, Homo, I think they're calling Juluensis.
01:11:03.000 Larger brain capacity by, I think, 20 plus percent.
01:11:06.000 Than ours.
01:11:07.000 And like, okay, what was their society?
01:11:09.000 Did they have empathy?
01:11:10.000 Did they have culture?
01:11:12.000 Did they have language?
01:11:14.000 Did they have oral tradition?
01:11:15.000 What did they have?
01:11:16.000 We don't know.
01:11:17.000 We only have bones.
01:11:20.000 We have bones and we have this prejudice, distinct.
01:11:24.000 We have this idea in our head that anything old must have been dumber than us.
01:11:29.000 And we might not make it.
01:11:32.000 We might not make it.
01:11:33.000 Human beings could go extinct.
01:11:36.000 Like, we were just having this conversation yesterday with my friend Sam Morell.
01:11:39.000 We're talking about this AI threat that a lot of these CEOs have said there's a 10% chance it could wipe out humanity.
01:11:47.000 Like, that's crazy.
01:11:49.000 So, if we got wiped out, and then millions and millions of years from now, you know, whatever natural catastrophe happens, AI gets wiped out, and then primates evolve slowly over time.
01:12:01.000 I mean, and then they find human brains.
01:12:03.000 Like, what?
01:12:04.000 Or a human skull.
01:12:05.000 Like, what the fuck was this thing?
01:12:06.000 Isn't there like a whole series of movies about that?
01:12:10.000 Yeah.
01:12:10.000 Planet of the Apes.
01:12:10.000 Planet of the Apes.
01:12:11.000 Yeah.
01:12:11.000 Well, it's probably, you know, I mean, I think the earth has had numerous enormous natural disasters, and there's a lot of evidence of that.
01:12:22.000 The Toba volcano knocked us down to a few thousand people 70 plus thousand years ago.
01:12:28.000 I think that's happened a ton of times, and I think it's super possible that it could happen where there's zero, and you got to start from scratch.
01:12:37.000 It's scary.
01:12:39.000 I think I just saw something on my phone earlier today.
01:12:42.000 I saw a headline.
01:12:43.000 It was like some AI.
01:12:44.000 Group said that their AI has ignored their commands or something like that.
01:12:50.000 Oh, yeah.
01:12:51.000 And I'm like, this is how Terminator starts.
01:12:52.000 This is exactly how it starts.
01:12:56.000 But yet we trudge on.
01:12:56.000 It's so weird.
01:12:59.000 Yeah.
01:12:59.000 Full steam ahead.
01:13:00.000 Yeah.
01:13:01.000 Because we have to, allegedly.
01:13:02.000 I wonder if that's in the Bible.
01:13:06.000 You know, I've always wondered what the original stories were based on.
01:13:13.000 I keep going to the origin story because, like, Adam and Eve being the one that the Christians share.
01:13:19.000 Is there a similar Adam and Eve story in other older?
01:13:23.000 Yeah, a lot of them have the early humans.
01:13:28.000 They're usually not individuals, they're usually groups.
01:13:31.000 Well, that makes a little more sense.
01:13:34.000 But we do have, there is an Adapa tale that is somewhat related.
01:13:34.000 Yeah.
01:13:43.000 And some people think that features of the Adam and Eve story were borrowed from Adapa, but it is not.
01:13:51.000 Well, yeah, the name sounds similar.
01:13:51.000 Sounds similar.
01:13:53.000 Sounds similar.
01:13:56.000 There are some folks who try to find inspiration for the Garden of Eden story in other later traditions, even going down to Nordic traditions and things like that that weren't copied down until only a thousand years or more ago.
01:14:14.000 I don't know that we can hunt down a single source for the story because it's primarily cobbling together a bunch of different things, but overwhelmingly, it's an ideology.
01:14:26.000 Etiology is an origin story for something that is going on today.
01:14:30.000 It's similar to Aesop's fables.
01:14:33.000 I don't know how many you can remember, but I used to know all the, you know, this is how the elephant got its long nose, and this is how, this is why the ants are industrious, and there are all kinds of these stories.
01:14:43.000 But when you look at the Adam and Eve story, and particularly the curses in Genesis 3, it's like, oh, this is why childbirth is painful.
01:14:53.000 This is why men have to work hard to make plants grow.
01:14:58.000 Oh, this is why.
01:15:00.000 We hate snakes.
01:15:01.000 And this is why snakes oddly don't have legs.
01:15:04.000 Like this little guy right here doesn't have any legs.
01:15:08.000 In an odd way, it's kind of an ideology for how the world got to be the way it was.
01:15:13.000 And you don't need a whole lot of inspiration from other traditions to do that.
01:15:18.000 But certainly the idea that the gods created humanity because they wanted to do something with humanity comes from other tales.
01:15:29.000 And the Epic of Gilgamesh is an interesting one.
01:15:33.000 I don't know how much you've read of Gilgamesh.
01:15:35.000 Aaron Powell, Jr.
01:15:36.000 A little bit.
01:15:37.000 Yeah, it's difficult.
01:15:38.000 It's difficult to absorb.
01:15:39.000 Aaron Powell, Jr.
01:15:40.000 There's a and part of the beginning, you've got Enki Doo as his bud and maybe more.
01:15:51.000 But there's a story about basically they have to kind of grow up and become civilized.
01:15:59.000 Initially, they're running around naked, and then there's a sex worker who shows up, and that Intercourse is what kind of catalyzes a maturation.
01:16:11.000 And now they're going to wear clothes and they're going to not run around in the nude like an animal.
01:16:17.000 And that's very similar to what I think we've got going on in Adam and Eve because they're innocent, they are naked, and they don't care.
01:16:25.000 And then when they eat the fruit, their eyes are open.
01:16:29.000 Suddenly they're like, oh, I'm ashamed of being naked in public.
01:16:33.000 I'm going to, you know, we're going to have clothing now.
01:16:36.000 And so, the fact that we've got this maturation going on in the early history of humanity where we go from more like an animal to more like a civilized human.
01:16:46.000 What is your take on the origin for this concept that we were better off ignorant?
01:16:51.000 Because that seems like you're eating from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.
01:16:57.000 Yeah.
01:16:58.000 Well, that seems like a good thing to be able to know what's good and evil, but the idea is that all that is the original sin and all of our issues happen because.
01:17:09.000 People ate from the knowledge of the tree of good and evil, and if they didn't, we would be in paradise still.
01:17:14.000 Well, I think that's a Christian interpretation.
01:17:16.000 Because in the Hebrew Bible, here, one interesting thing about the story of Adam and Eve, specifically Adam and Eve, their story is never mentioned once again anywhere in the Hebrew Bible.
01:17:28.000 You have in one book You would think that would be kind of important.
01:17:31.000 Yeah, you would think.
01:17:32.000 Nobody talks about it until we get to the New Testament.
01:17:35.000 There's a reference to Adam at the very beginning of a big genealogy in Chronicles.
01:17:39.000 And in Ezekiel 28, there's a reference to the mountain of Eden, which you would imagine would be the same thing, but there's no mountain in the story in Genesis 2 and 3.
01:17:49.000 2 and 3.
01:17:50.000 So it's a different tradition.
01:17:52.000 Whatever's going on in Ezekiel 28 is not just they're aware of much more than just what's in Genesis 2 and 3.
01:17:58.000 But so throughout the Hebrew Bible and even in Greco-Roman period Judaism and down into some parts of the New Testament, it's not Adam's and Eve's fault that evil exists.
01:18:10.000 That's not the main story that they use to understand why evil exists.
01:18:14.000 The main story that they use is from Genesis 6, where the angels well, they're angels in later interpretation, but they're second tier deities, they come down and they have children with the human women.
01:18:26.000 And this is what causes God to send the flood.
01:18:29.000 But you're familiar with the book of 1st Enoch.
01:18:31.000 And so that is a version of that story where that is what caused evil to be on the earth.
01:18:39.000 The angels came down and brought all of this knowledge and gave it to the humans, including how to make weapons of war.
01:18:46.000 And makeup is listed as one of the evil things that the angels taught humanity.
01:18:52.000 And so I think that, up until the New Testament was written, that was probably the dominant tradition about where evil came from.
01:19:02.000 And then in the New Testament, we kind of see both of them.
01:19:05.000 Paul talks about Adam and Eve.
01:19:07.000 But in other parts of the New Testament, in Jude, for instance, they quote directly from the book of 1st Enoch, calling it a prophecy.
01:19:17.000 But they also talk about the angels who left their first estate and engaged in all this wickedness.
01:19:23.000 And so it seems like these are competing traditions about where evil came from.
01:19:28.000 And the first Enoch tradition was probably the dominant one.
01:19:32.000 And then because of Paul and the New Testament, we can kind of see traces of both of them in there.
01:19:37.000 But I think Christianity later decided to just go with the one that was in their canon, which was the Genesis one.
01:19:44.000 And blame the woman for everything.
01:19:46.000 And well, yeah, you do have Which, by the way, I want to let women off the hook.
01:19:51.000 Adam talked to God, Eve did not.
01:19:53.000 Maybe Adam forgot to tell Eve to not eat the fruit from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.
01:20:02.000 It's never specified that he did.
01:20:03.000 Aaron Powell Yeah, and that's an interesting part of the story because what Eve says is the rule is not what God told Adam.
01:20:10.000 It's different.
01:20:11.000 Now, ultimately, it's still don't eat the fruit, but she says we shouldn't even touch it or we'll die.
01:20:19.000 There are a couple of details that and so this has puzzled people for centuries.
01:20:24.000 Where did Eve get her idea of why they weren't supposed to eat the fruit?
01:20:31.000 So, did Adam report it to her and get it wrong?
01:20:34.000 Did God show up off camera, off stage, and tell Eve the same command but in a slightly different way?
01:20:42.000 Now, this is probably a literary creation, but for the earliest audience who heard someone sharing this story, they would have probably thought the same.
01:20:52.000 That's not the same thing that God said to Adam.
01:20:54.000 So, the author probably had something in mind about how to account for.
01:20:59.000 For why Eve's story was different, and we don't have any access to that.
01:21:02.000 So we have no idea.
01:21:03.000 And this is actually something that scholars talk about.
01:21:05.000 Did the author want you to imagine that Adam is the one who passed it on to Eve and just amplified things?
01:21:11.000 Trevor Burrus You would think that would be specified.
01:21:13.000 Aaron Ross Powell You would think, but it's not.
01:21:15.000 And is it the accident of preservation?
01:21:17.000 Do we just have a much shorter version of a story that was originally much longer, or is that how it was originally written?
01:21:24.000 It seems to be at least based on our earliest manuscripts.
01:21:27.000 It doesn't seem to have changed much since as far back as we can go.
01:21:33.000 These are the kinds of questions that keep us up at night.
01:21:36.000 Keep us up at night.
01:21:37.000 Well, it's so fascinating because if you just imagine our version of the Bible today and if we continue to exist as a society a thousand years from now, most likely it would be the exact same version because we're really good at keeping records, right?
01:21:54.000 I think there would be versions that are very close, if not exact, but I think at the same time there would be versions that are very different because the - so the King James version is the - I think it's probably still - The highest selling Bible translation.
01:22:11.000 I don't think it's the most read.
01:22:12.000 I think the NIB might be the most read.
01:22:14.000 NIB was a reference.
01:22:15.000 NIV, New International Version, or Not Inspired Version is another reference that I think is kind of funny.
01:22:23.000 Most modern translations of the New Testament have taken out more than a dozen verses that are in the King James Version.
01:22:32.000 Because since the King James Version was translated, we have discovered hundreds more manuscripts.
01:22:32.000 Why?
01:22:38.000 And we have been able to do a lot more study and a lot better study on those manuscripts to figure out what most likely these manuscripts originally said.
01:22:48.000 Originally is a complicated term in academics.
01:22:53.000 But our ability to reconstruct the text as it was in its earliest stage.
01:23:00.000 And we know that some of the passages that are in the King James Version were added later on.
01:23:06.000 They were not written by the author.
01:23:08.000 And so now, when we publish these.
01:23:10.000 Translations of the New Testament.
01:23:13.000 We just omit the verse.
01:23:15.000 And because versification is kind of complex to just redo, we just leave the verse out entirely.
01:23:21.000 So if you look in Matthew 17, for instance, you'll see verse 18, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24.
01:23:26.000 And there'll be a footnote at the end of verse 20 that'll say, Some ancient manuscripts add, and then it'll quote a translation of verse 21.
01:23:36.000 And this freaks people out when they discover this, if they don't know the history, the reason.
01:23:41.000 That these passages were taken out.
01:23:43.000 There are about 16 passages in the New Testament that have been taken out.
01:23:47.000 Is there any debate about whether or not they should have been taken out?
01:23:52.000 Aaron Powell, among scholars, not really.
01:23:53.000 So, for instance, the passage in Matthew 17 21, we have some very, very old manuscripts that don't have it at all.
01:24:03.000 It's just not in there.
01:24:04.000 And then we have like Codex Sinaiticus, which is mid 4th century CE.
01:24:08.000 So, this text, this codex was probably transcribed a little after the Council of Nicaea.
01:24:16.000 And it's not in the main body of text, but there's a little star in the margin.
01:24:22.000 And then up at the top, somebody scribbled in this passage.
01:24:26.000 And then in manuscripts after Sinaiticus, it's in the main body of text.
01:24:32.000 And so we can see in action the verse being added to the manuscripts.
01:24:37.000 What is the verse?
01:24:39.000 It says this is where the disciples are coming back to Jesus and saying, Yeah, we've forgiven sins, we've cast out sin.
01:24:48.000 Demons, and there's this one demon we can't cast out, and Jesus says, Yeah, that kind doesn't come out except by prayer and fasting.
01:24:55.000 Now, this is actually being borrowed from a similar story in Mark 9.
01:25:00.000 And so, what most scholars think happened was an early scribe was like, Okay, this is the same story.
01:25:06.000 This detail is in Mark, but it's omitted in Matthew.
01:25:10.000 I'm going to scratch it into the manuscript there.
01:25:13.000 And then later on, it gets worked right into the body of the text.
01:25:18.000 So, most modern translations of the New Testament.
01:25:21.000 There are about 16 verses that are commonly just omitted, and they're included in footnotes.
01:25:26.000 And they're included in footnotes.
01:25:28.000 But also, the ending of Mark, the whole story of Jesus' post resurrection appearance at the end of Mark, scholars agree that's not original.
01:25:37.000 That was something that was added.
01:25:38.000 So, chapter 16, verses 9 through 20, a lot of translations will put them in brackets, and a footnote will say, you know, this comes from later manuscripts.
01:25:49.000 It's not in the original version.
01:25:51.000 And there are a handful of stories like that.
01:25:54.000 And then with the Dead Sea Scrolls, we have a better idea of how some verses read.
01:25:59.000 We have a better idea of.
01:26:00.000 What verses might have been added.
01:26:01.000 We even have a whole paragraph that was omitted that we didn't really know.
01:26:06.000 We knew something was supposed to be there, but we had no idea what, and we found out what was supposed to be there in the Dead Sea Scrolls.
01:26:12.000 So maybe we discover another cache of ancient manuscripts of the Bible, and maybe they're earlier than the Dead Sea Scrolls.
01:26:20.000 Oh, that would be exciting.
01:26:21.000 Oh, it would be phenomenal.
01:26:23.000 I would love that so much.
01:26:24.000 But a thousand years down the road, who knows what the Bible will look like?
01:26:29.000 Now, there are still people who are like, no, it's the KJV or nothing.
01:26:32.000 And.
01:26:34.000 I think people like that will be around a thousand years as well.
01:26:37.000 But I think we will just multiply the available versions of the Bible, and some of them will probably be closer to what was originally written, originally.
01:26:47.000 And some of them will be people trying to hold on to their favorite translation or their favorite version.
01:26:52.000 Trevor Burrus It's just such an insane story that a sheep herder or a goat herder threw a rock into a cave and hit a clay vessel and heard it shatter, and then realized there was something in there and decided to go look.
01:27:08.000 If not for that, how long?
01:27:11.000 Who knows?
01:27:12.000 We still wouldn't know.
01:27:13.000 I mean, it might.
01:27:15.000 I mean, that cave might not have ever been discovered.
01:27:18.000 I mean, who knows?
01:27:20.000 That was 1947.
01:27:21.000 Yeah.
01:27:22.000 Yeah.
01:27:23.000 I think it.
01:27:23.000 Actually, I think it probably would have been discovered because this.
01:27:26.000 That's right around the time that Israel became a state.
01:27:29.000 When Israel became a state, it now had state funding for archaeological research.
01:27:33.000 And so excavations.
01:27:34.000 So they started going looking around.
01:27:35.000 They started going looking all over the place.
01:27:37.000 And so, within.
01:27:38.000 by the 60s or 70s.
01:27:40.000 There would have been enough excavations ongoing at Qumran that they would have.
01:27:44.000 I've been to Qumran a couple of times.
01:27:46.000 You can see the cave's not far away.
01:27:48.000 It's like that's going to be a trip to kind of get to it.
01:27:51.000 How insane is it that that cave sat undisturbed for 2,000 years?
01:27:55.000 Yeah, you had to.
01:27:57.000 That is so nuts.
01:27:58.000 Is that it?
01:27:59.000 Right there?
01:28:00.000 Well, there are a bunch of caves, but that's one of them.
01:28:04.000 I mean, imagine if somebody decided not to store it there and just leave it out somewhere or they died.
01:28:11.000 They were going to go store it there and they got killed in a raid.
01:28:14.000 This is one of the kind of tragic things about archaeology is when a lot of people are getting killed at the same time.
01:28:21.000 That's good for us.
01:28:23.000 Because we find the bodies.
01:28:25.000 Well, not just the bodies, but that's the circumstance that's most likely to preserve stuff.
01:28:31.000 Because when they burn things to the ground, particularly if you have things on clay tablets, that bakes the clay tablets and they stay exactly as they are until we find them.
01:28:41.000 So some of our best discoveries have been because somebody burnt a building down and it happened to be an archive.
01:28:49.000 Or at a library, or the palace where the king stored all the annals, or something like that.
01:28:55.000 And then the reason that we have all of the.
01:28:57.000 Pointing at a blank screen.
01:28:58.000 The reason that we have all of the Qumran stuff is because that whole community was destroyed by the Romans around 68 ish CE.
01:29:07.000 And nobody was alive to come back and get all the stuff that they had stuffed in those caves for safekeeping.
01:29:14.000 Who knows how long people were living there writing things down that we haven't found yet?
01:29:20.000 The weirdest shit is.
01:29:21.000 Shit is, you know, the megalithic architecture underneath the west wall.
01:29:27.000 The stones?
01:29:28.000 Yeah.
01:29:29.000 The enormous stones.
01:29:31.000 Like, who the fuck put those there?
01:29:33.000 You know what I mean?
01:29:34.000 Like, what were those guys doing?
01:29:36.000 And imagine if they find something, you know, with ground penetrating radar, some new cache of texts and scrolls or tablets or something.
01:29:36.000 Yeah.
01:29:46.000 Oh, we'd have a field day.
01:29:47.000 Oh, my goodness.
01:29:48.000 I mean, it's so interesting trying, you know, or not me, you know, archaeologists, trying to piece together.
01:29:55.000 This understanding of human civilization just based on what's left over and knowing that in a lot of places there's not going to be anything left over and just guessing.
01:30:04.000 That's called the accident of preservation.
01:30:05.000 And it results in a problem because we gather all the data that we might get and we think that this is everything.
01:30:13.000 We have to constantly remind ourselves no, this is like only what we're finding in tombs.
01:30:19.000 We try to reconstruct so much stuff from just what we find in a tomb.
01:30:23.000 An entire, even household, much less society.
01:30:28.000 And a lot of our stuff has what we call a mortuary bias, precisely because we tend to find stuff when it gets buried.
01:30:38.000 And usually, tombs are the things that tend to get buried, or we find stuff when cities are destroyed in what we call a conflagration.
01:30:46.000 What is this here, Jeremy?
01:30:49.000 I went to Google Maps to the Kumaran Caves, and this is a video of what it looks like when they're digging.
01:30:55.000 And that's being taken from a little ridge.
01:30:58.000 Yeah, they've got walkways there now.
01:31:01.000 And those are the remains of the community that they built there at Qumran.
01:31:08.000 Most likely.
01:31:10.000 You imagine going in a time machine and just being able to gaze upon these people just for fucking 10 minutes.
01:31:16.000 What was life like?
01:31:18.000 This is something that I've always found fascinating.
01:31:21.000 The more I've done research in cognitive science of religion and learned more about why our brains work the way they do.
01:31:29.000 It's helped me understand some of the things that I've experienced myself in relation to ancient stuff like that.
01:31:37.000 Like, I was in, I did one of my master's degrees at the University of Oxford, and the Bodleian libraries are just unreal.
01:31:43.000 But I held a tablet that was thousands of years old and looked at the bottom, and there was a thumbprint on the bottom.
01:31:52.000 It was like, I'm looking at the fingerprint of whoever did this.
01:31:57.000 They just happened to leave a fingerprint on that when they were creating this tablet, and that is frozen in time.
01:32:02.000 And it kind of, and I have the cognitive explanation for this, but it kind of gins up a sense of their presence.
01:32:09.000 There's a sense in which you kind of feel the presence of those people when you have such a clear kind of cue to human involvement.
01:32:18.000 And that kind of stuff, I live for that kind of stuff.
01:32:22.000 And so I love archaeology.
01:32:23.000 I love going in and seeing the domestic stuff where it's like, oh, this is where a kid played with toys in the corner of this house or something like that.
01:32:33.000 You get a weird feeling when you go to old places.
01:32:35.000 And it's hard to understand what you're feeling.
01:32:35.000 Yeah.
01:32:38.000 Is your brain playing a trick?
01:32:41.000 Is it because you've attached significance to this site?
01:32:45.000 Or is it because I would like to go to somewhere that's really sacred, ignorant?
01:32:50.000 Like someone take me, hey, we're going to take you around.
01:32:54.000 How are you feeling?
01:32:55.000 Well, I think we see people doing that a lot when they go travel and visit places they don't know a whole ton about, but they might visit one of their sacred places.
01:33:08.000 Sites and frequently not treated very sacredly at all.
01:33:12.000 Well, especially if it's an opposing ideology or religion.
01:33:12.000 That's true.
01:33:15.000 Yeah, that's a real problem.
01:33:16.000 Like when the Taliban blew up those statues, it's horrific.
01:33:20.000 It's horrific.
01:33:21.000 But there's something about some certain sites.
01:33:26.000 I went to Eleusis, is that how you say it?
01:33:28.000 Eleusis in Greece.
01:33:32.000 And you get to be at the actual ground where they have those Eleusinian mystery ceremonies.
01:33:38.000 It just feels weird.
01:33:41.000 It feels really weird.
01:33:42.000 Yeah, yeah.
01:33:43.000 When you understand the imports.
01:33:44.000 Yes, but that's the problem I understood it.
01:33:48.000 And I was actually there with Brian Murrow Rescue.
01:33:50.000 Which is really cool to be able to see.
01:33:51.000 You were feeling it in more ways than one.
01:33:53.000 Because he was explaining to me what I'm looking at, and it just feels super weird.
01:33:53.000 For sure.
01:33:58.000 But there's that thing where you're like, okay, am I adding meaning to this?
01:34:03.000 Well, I'll tell you about a place that I visited that I'm probably the only person on earth who thinks of this as a particularly sacred site.
01:34:10.000 But there's in the southern Negev, there's a site called Arad, which is Where's the southern Negev?
01:34:17.000 The desert in the south of Judea.
01:34:21.000 So, Arad is a place where they've got a tell, a big hill, and there was a Bronze Age village there.
01:34:27.000 But on the very top, there are the remains of a fortress that existed in the 8th century BCE.
01:34:31.000 And in the corner of the fortress is an Israelite temple.
01:34:35.000 And they've got the remains of the walls, they've got the three different rooms the courtyard, the broad room, and the Debir or the Holy of Holies.
01:34:50.000 And they found a standing stone, which would have represented the God of Israel.
01:34:54.000 They found, they have the altar.
01:34:56.000 They had discovered a bunch of inscriptions.
01:34:59.000 It talks about the house of Adonai, the God of Israel.
01:35:02.000 And they also found a couple of incense altars that were on the steps of the Holy of Holies.
01:35:09.000 And so I go there, and that's where, because I'm fascinated by the fact that, you know, the biblical story that there was just one temple in Jerusalem is just not accurate.
01:35:21.000 There were temples scattered all around.
01:35:23.000 We found a handful of them.
01:35:25.000 In fact, just like, 10 to 15 years ago, we found another one only a few miles outside of Jerusalem at a place called Tel Motzah.
01:35:32.000 So they had temples operating all over the place.
01:35:35.000 And because of propaganda, like the book of Deuteronomy, a lot of scholars believe was written so that the king in Jerusalem could say, close down all the temples.
01:35:48.000 Mine's the only one that gets to stay open now.
01:35:50.000 And this might have been one of the ones that was closed down as a result of that.
01:35:54.000 But interestingly enough, people ask me a lot about.
01:35:58.000 Narcotics in the Bible and stuff like that.
01:36:01.000 But this is one where they tested the burnt residue that was on top of the incense altars, and one of them had three different kinds of cannabis on it.
01:36:08.000 So we know for a fact they were using cannabis in their worship practices in ancient Israel.
01:36:13.000 Which completely makes sense.
01:36:16.000 Yeah.
01:36:17.000 That's what you would use as incense.
01:36:19.000 I mean, if you want to get a contact tie going for the entire crowd and you sing those songs, they have so much more meaning to them.
01:36:19.000 Yeah.
01:36:25.000 Yeah.
01:36:25.000 And that's certainly going to make you feel like you're in the presence of something.
01:36:29.000 Unworldly.
01:36:29.000 If you're going in there, the room's filled with smoke, you're not seeing much, but you feel good.
01:36:36.000 Did you ever get into any of John Marco Allegro's stuff?
01:36:41.000 I'm aware of the sacred mushroom and the cross, but it's mainly etymological.
01:36:45.000 That's the main argument, and it has been just torn to shreds.
01:36:52.000 Yeah, yeah.
01:36:52.000 Has it?
01:36:53.000 Since it came out, like back when it came out, there were a handful of some of the leading linguists of ancient Hebrew, of Sumerian.
01:37:02.000 Of ancient Hebrew, of Sumerian.
01:37:06.000 Thorkel Jacobson is a Sumerologist, and Barr, James Barr, was one of the leading Hebrew Semiticists in the world.
01:37:15.000 The argument is basically that the Hebrew and the Greek all go back to these Sumerian words that have to do with semen, with mushrooms, and all this kind of stuff.
01:37:28.000 The problem is, Hebrew and Greek are not descended from Sumerian, and there's not a lot of contact.
01:37:35.000 Was overwhelmingly gone by the time that Hebrew started existing.
01:37:41.000 There were just a handful of liturgical uses and words and things like that.
01:37:46.000 But the connections that are made are just not considered plausible by linguists today.
01:37:54.000 And so, yeah, it's not been well received by scholars ever since it originally came out.
01:38:00.000 In fact, I think that some of those scholars who were friends of Allegro's, because he was a phenomenal textual critic, when it came to the Dead Sea Scrolls, A lot of the scholars who were assigned fragments of the Dead Sea Scrolls just sat on them for years and years and years.
01:38:14.000 They were doing research, but it was so slow getting out.
01:38:17.000 Allegra was the first one to get research out the door.
01:38:21.000 He was a phenomenal scroll scholar.
01:38:23.000 From what I understand, some of his friends tried to urge him not to publish that book because they thought it would be pretty detrimental to his career.
01:38:33.000 My understanding is that it was, unfortunately.
01:38:35.000 Well, it seems like the book was removed from circulation.
01:38:37.000 And then only within the last decade or so, someone brought it back.
01:38:42.000 I'd have to.
01:38:44.000 I think it was a couple of decades ago.
01:38:45.000 I'd have to verify that because I know I've seen scans of the book for a while now.
01:38:50.000 Yeah, I bought it online.
01:38:52.000 You could buy old versions of it.
01:38:54.000 Yeah.
01:38:54.000 But a guy named Jan Irvin, I think, was the guy who.
01:38:58.000 I think he's responsible for republishing it.
01:39:01.000 I think that was in the early 2000s, somewhere around then.
01:39:05.000 Okay.
01:39:06.000 But I think it might have been purchased by the Catholic Church or something like that.
01:39:06.000 Yeah.
01:39:11.000 I have heard a lot of people say that the Catholic Church tried to shut it down.
01:39:11.000 Yeah.
01:39:15.000 Because he wrote another book afterwards called The Dead Sea Scrolls and the Christian Myth that covered similar topics.
01:39:21.000 Yeah, I think it was kind of a mythicist take that Jesus never existed or.
01:39:25.000 Yeah.
01:39:25.000 He likened the word Christ to an ancient Sumerian word that made a mushroom covered in God's semen.
01:39:31.000 Yeah, yeah.
01:39:32.000 Which is, yo.
01:39:33.000 And the problem is that when you.
01:39:37.000 I remember reading that part of the book a couple years ago.
01:39:40.000 And it was like, okay, basically recreating a Sumerian word that we have no evidence ever existed and saying that that recreated Sumerian word was the etymological origin of the word Christ.
01:39:55.000 And the connection there is, as far as any scholars can tell, entirely imaginary.
01:40:02.000 There's no real plausible link.
01:40:05.000 There's no real chain of custody.
01:40:07.000 There's no real way that knowledge of that etymology could have made it down.
01:40:12.000 A thousand years down the road without anybody finding out about it.
01:40:18.000 So it's not that it's impossible.
01:40:20.000 Implausible.
01:40:20.000 But it's not plausible, right.
01:40:21.000 It's implausible and it's certainly not most likely.
01:40:24.000 It's just so fascinating that by the time this is written, the Sumerian language is gone, which is weird.
01:40:32.000 The idea that these languages just come and go is so strange.
01:40:38.000 And Sumerian is a language isolate too, which means it's not directly connected to any other languages that are still around.
01:40:45.000 Or that were even around anciently.
01:40:47.000 Which is really weird when you get into the ancient Sumerian stories and how they're similar to some of the stories that are in the Bible, like the Epic of Gilgamesh.
01:40:59.000 Are in the Bible, like the Epic of Gilgamesh.
01:41:01.000 The Epic of Gilgamesh is so strange.
01:41:04.000 So, the flood versions of the Epic of Gilgamesh, are they inspired by other flood versions?
01:41:13.000 Aaron Ross Powell, Jr.
01:41:14.000 You've got a few different stories of the flood.
01:41:16.000 In the Epic of Gilgamesh, he's going to find Utnapishtim, who was the one who survived the flood.
01:41:22.000 The flood has already happened in the Gilgamesh epic.
01:41:25.000 Atrahasis is another version of that story.
01:41:29.000 If you go all the way back to the Sumerian king lists, We have king lists that predate the introduction of a flood story.
01:41:38.000 And in fact, a lot of scholars think that Genesis actually was circulating in a version that didn't have a flood story.
01:41:43.000 Really?
01:41:44.000 Yeah, until someone put it in there.
01:41:47.000 That's a great question.
01:41:47.000 When do they think that happened?
01:41:50.000 They probably date it to somewhere around the 6th to 5th century BCE because Noah is a horticulturist in the oldest tales of what's going on here.
01:42:01.000 And there's no indication of a flood.
01:42:04.000 In fact, if you go in Genesis 4, You have some patriarchs who are mentioned.
01:42:08.000 And it's like, and this was the progenitor of those who live in tents.
01:42:12.000 And this was the progenitor of those who play the lyre and the harp.
01:42:16.000 And this is the progenitor of those who work in all kinds of metals.
01:42:19.000 And it's like, the progenitor of nothing because they and all their lines would have died just a couple chapters down the road.
01:42:27.000 So whoever's writing this doesn't know that they're supposed to all die.
01:42:32.000 Because he's talking about, you know, look around, we got all these people living in tents and their ancestor is this guy.
01:42:38.000 And it's like, what about the flood?
01:42:40.000 And where do you think that story comes from?
01:42:43.000 How does it get introduced?
01:42:45.000 That's a big question a lot of scholars have been trying to solve for a long time.
01:42:50.000 But some people think that Genesis 6, the story of the B'nai Elohim, the children of God, they come down and have children with human women, and that ticks God off.
01:43:01.000 And so that seems like an original catalyst for sending the flood.
01:43:06.000 I'm sending the flood to kill all of these folks because that's gross.
01:43:10.000 These gods had demigod children.
01:43:14.000 But that's not the reason that's given in the text for why the flood came.
01:43:20.000 The reason it's given in the text is there was violence everywhere.
01:43:23.000 And so that's like, man, it's kind of a different story.
01:43:27.000 And if you look in 1st Enoch, that kind of fills in some of the gaps.
01:43:34.000 Because in the story of 1st Enoch, there's violence everywhere because the children of this divine human mating are giants.
01:43:43.000 And then the Nephilim are their children.
01:43:46.000 And then when the Nephilim die, their souls become the demons that haunt the world.
01:43:52.000 And so that kind of better fits what's going on in Genesis.
01:43:57.000 But the story of 1st Enoch was probably written down somewhere around 300 BCE.
01:44:01.000 It comes much later.
01:44:04.000 And we don't know if that story is actually maybe earlier than the story of the flood that we have in Genesis.
01:44:11.000 So it's how it came together is something that I don't think we're ever going to be really, really sure about.
01:44:18.000 We just got a bunch of speculation that is based on the observation that some things don't seem to fit together quite right.
01:44:25.000 And then we have other versions of the story that would fit much better.
01:44:29.000 And the same is true of the book of Daniel.
01:44:32.000 There are some fragments in the Dead Sea Scrolls that talk about Nabonidus and talk about these stories related to Daniel, but they're not in the book of Daniel.
01:44:41.000 And so some scholars wonder if the book of Daniel was being cobbled together around that time period.
01:44:47.000 And we have some of what was left on the editing room floor.
01:44:50.000 Oh, wow.
01:44:51.000 References to Nabonidus and things like that.
01:44:55.000 And things like that.
01:44:56.000 So, it's how it all came together is phenomenally complex, and there's constantly a debate between how much we can say, how much we can speculate or hypothesize about versus how much we should be limiting ourselves to saying because we can speculate about all kinds of stuff, but until we have enough data to be confident, it's not really much more than speculation.
01:45:25.000 Of the Ethiopian Bible?
01:45:27.000 What is the origin of that?
01:45:28.000 So, the Ethiopian Bible, we have a couple of manuscripts of Gospels called the Garamah Gospels that date to between the 4th and the 6th centuries CE.
01:45:39.000 And the Ethiopian Bible descends probably from some people who probably brought a version of the Septuagint, the ancient Greek translation of the Bible, down to the kingdom of Aksum, probably late 3rd or early 4th century CE.
01:45:59.000 This is right around the time of the Council of Nicaea.
01:46:01.000 This would have been something that looked similar to what we have in Codex Sinaiticus.
01:46:07.000 That collection of Septuagint texts, which included 1st Enoch, Jubilees, a bunch of other apocryphal and pseudepigraphical texts, it seems like down there in Ethiopia they were just content to keep on keeping on with what they had, just ignoring all of the canon debates that were going on up north.
01:46:27.000 Trevor Burrus Were they just not in contact?
01:46:32.000 didn't feel any obligation to honor the authority of the folks who were arguing in Constantinople and Rome and stuff like that.
01:46:40.000 So, as they were figuring out their canon up north, down south, they were happy to continue to transmit their texts.
01:46:47.000 So, today, the earliest manuscript of any kind we have translated into Ge'ez, the ancient Ethiopic languages, are the Garima Gospels from the 4th to 6th century CE.
01:46:58.000 Most of our manuscripts come from the medieval period, around the 11th century or later.
01:47:05.000 It's popular to say that the Ethiopian Bible is the earliest Bible, but it is based on the ancient Greek translation.
01:47:13.000 While the ancient Greek translation probably does preserve some earlier readings than our later Hebrew does, we have better ways of sussing that out.
01:47:20.000 The Dead Sea Scrolls help us an awful lot.
01:47:23.000 Text critically, in trying to reconstruct the earliest possible Bible, the Ethiopian manuscripts are of very little value.
01:47:33.000 They're of inestimable value.
01:47:36.000 And trying to understand how Christianity evolved in Ethiopia and how the texts that they were using evolved in Ethiopia.
01:47:43.000 And then, since the world became aware of the Ethiopian Bible and texts like 1st Enoch and Jubilees and things like that, because we didn't have the whole of 1st Enoch until we had those Ethiopian manuscripts.
01:47:58.000 That's crazy.
01:47:58.000 So they were getting it from an early Greek translation.
01:48:04.000 So 1st Enoch was in the earlier Greek translation.
01:48:07.000 So, when did 1 Enoch get removed from the canon?
01:48:11.000 So, 1 Enoch probably fell out of favor before the canon was formalized.
01:48:16.000 Because if the people bringing the Septuagint down to the kingdom of Aksum did so at the end of the third century, beginning of the fourth century CE, it seems quite likely that 1 Enoch was still considered, if not an inspired text, at least an important text.
01:48:36.000 And particularly because we have in the letter of Jude in the New Testament this direct quotation.
01:48:41.000 Introduced by saying, Enoch, the seventh from Adam, prophesied.
01:48:45.000 Prophesied saying.
01:48:47.000 So, this is something that the author of the Epistle of Jude recognizes as inspired prophecy.
01:48:53.000 So, we have scholars arguing over the canonicity, the inspired nature of 1st Enoch in early Christianity.
01:49:02.000 There's one guy in particular named Tertullian, who's toward the end of the second century CE, who defends the authenticity and the canonicity of 1st Enoch.
01:49:12.000 So, this is like 175 ish CE.
01:49:16.000 He writes a text called On the Apparel of Women because, you know, He's gonna.
01:49:21.000 And one of the chapters is entirely defending the authenticity of 1st Enoch.
01:49:27.000 And because the criticisms were, it seems unlikely that this text survived the flood and has been faithfully transmitted ever since then.
01:49:36.000 And it seems to contradict itself in a variety of places.
01:49:40.000 The stories get told over and over in slightly different ways.
01:49:45.000 And then also, it contradicts a lot of the stuff that Christians are finding in the New Testament and in their Hebrew Bible.
01:49:53.000 And so it was becoming unpopular in the second and into the third century.
01:49:58.000 But by the time we get to our Codex Sinaiticus and our Codex Vaticanus in the fourth century, in the middle to the late fourth century, there's no sign of 1st Enoch.
01:50:08.000 How does 1st Enoch contradict itself?
01:50:11.000 The stories about the angels coming down get repeated a couple different times because it's actually not a single narrative.
01:50:17.000 It's a collection of five different books, traditions.
01:50:21.000 You have the book of the Watchers, you have.
01:50:25.000 The parables of Enoch.
01:50:26.000 You have the animal apocalypse, which is basically retelling the story, but everybody's an animal.
01:50:33.000 So, like, the star falls from heaven, and then these other stars come down, and then they breed, and they're cows, and then their offspring are a certain color.
01:50:46.000 And these are like different social groups that they're supposed to represent.
01:50:50.000 And it's kind of a compressed history of Israel being told.
01:50:54.000 As if everybody was an animal.
01:50:57.000 So, yeah, the vibe is.
01:51:00.000 Weird.
01:51:02.000 Yeah, it's kind of a willow vibe when everybody's turning into pigs.
01:51:06.000 I get that vibe when I read that.
01:51:10.000 So, it's a collection of five different stories.
01:51:15.000 And the five different stories, and they're not all telling the exact same story, but where there is overlap, they don't align perfectly.
01:51:23.000 So, it is internally inconsistent.
01:51:26.000 The Book of the Watchers is one of the weirdest things I've ever read.
01:51:29.000 It's like, what were these people trying to say?
01:51:32.000 I just, I just, this is my frustration with all and fascination with all this stuff.
01:51:37.000 It's like, what was the original story?
01:51:40.000 What were they trying to convey?
01:51:42.000 Are they trying to convey a historical moment or are they trying to explain something in a way that makes sense?
01:51:51.000 Why is the sky blue, Dad?
01:51:54.000 You know what I mean?
01:51:54.000 Are they coming up with an explanation just to stop questions?
01:51:58.000 And I think there's a reason that.
01:52:01.000 It pops up in the time that it does because this is where we're getting a lot of suffering on the part of the people of Israel and Judah because they've gone through the Babylonian exile.
01:52:10.000 They're basically going to be under the boot of some larger empire from then on, except for a little slice of time.
01:52:19.000 They're going to be subordinate to larger empires that are going to be beating up on them.
01:52:23.000 And so this is the time when a lot of them are wondering why is all of this going on?
01:52:27.000 Where is our God who loves us so much?
01:52:30.000 And this is where the idea of Okay, where are we going to see our justice?
01:52:35.000 Where's the punishment for the bad people?
01:52:37.000 Where's the reward for the good people?
01:52:39.000 That's probably what gives rise to the idea that, oh, it's probably in the afterlife where this is going to happen.
01:52:46.000 And so we first see concepts of heaven and hell in Enoch and in this time period, and they develop as we get into the New Testament.
01:52:55.000 And so I think it's trying to accomplish a lot of those bigger questions.
01:52:59.000 What is the meaning of all this?
01:53:00.000 Why do good people suffer?
01:53:02.000 Why are wicked people so successful?
01:53:05.000 And one of the things that it's doing is trying to suggest that evil was introduced to the world.
01:53:10.000 By these wicked angels who came down to earth and taught women how to put on makeup.
01:53:17.000 There's a woman involved in whether you like the Adam and Eve story or you like the first Enoch story.
01:53:23.000 For some reason, they like it.
01:53:24.000 It was written by men.
01:53:25.000 Yeah, it was written by men.
01:53:26.000 That's a big part of it.
01:53:27.000 Probably the root of it.
01:53:29.000 It's so complicated to try to figure out what they were trying to do.
01:53:40.000 When they were explaining certain concepts, and there's certain things that get explained today that aren't necessarily really in the Bible.
01:53:50.000 So, the concept of hell, let's get into that.
01:53:54.000 Because, like, when is that so it's first introduced in Enoch?
01:53:58.000 Yeah, I think that's the first time we get something like that.
01:54:01.000 I think you get inklings of it at the very end, like the very last verse of the book of Isaiah, and maybe in Daniel 12.
01:54:09.000 Inklings.
01:54:10.000 Inklings, yeah.
01:54:12.000 So there's a.
01:54:13.000 The passage ends by talking about a fire that, a flame that doesn't go out and a worm that never dies.
01:54:21.000 And this is what scholars would suggest is that the idea here is it's talking about some place where the wicked are going.
01:54:31.000 And the idea is the fire is never going out because there's always more fuel to add to it because more people are going into it.
01:54:41.000 And the worm never dies because it always has more food.
01:54:44.000 Being thrown into it.
01:54:46.000 That gets reinterpreted later on as the fire is eternal and the punishment is eternal.
01:54:53.000 It probably wasn't intended to say that.
01:54:57.000 But these are and then we have in Daniel 12 a notion of the wicked being punished.
01:55:03.000 How is this described in ancient Hebrew versus the English translations?
01:55:07.000 It's pretty straightforward.
01:55:09.000 It's not incredibly different.
01:55:10.000 Is there something potentially that could have been lost in the translation?
01:55:15.000 Probably not.
01:55:16.000 I think we've got a lot of different translations of Isaiah and a lot of different scholars who've done a lot of good work.
01:55:22.000 There's not really much that's going to be much different.
01:55:26.000 But also we have that idea that is repeated a few times in the New Testament where they're referring to Gehenna as the place where the fire never goes out and the worm doesn't die.
01:55:37.000 So whoever wrote the New Testament passages in that time period, they understood it in pretty much the same way we understand it now.
01:55:47.000 One of the most disturbing ideas that a lot of secular people have is this notion that Christians like to project that if you do not follow Jesus, you're going to burn in hell forever, no matter how good of a person you are.
01:56:00.000 Yeah.
01:56:00.000 Where does that come from?
01:56:02.000 That's not something that's ever stated anywhere in the Bible.
01:56:06.000 Yeah, that's what I thought.
01:56:07.000 That is an interpretation, yeah.
01:56:08.000 Because when we, just like 1 Enoch, it's a collection of five different books.
01:56:13.000 If you look back on it and you say this all has to mean the same thing, you basically have to create a new sixth.
01:56:19.000 Narrative that harmonizes it all, that makes it all fit.
01:56:24.000 And that's what we did with the New Testament.
01:56:26.000 Once we got it all together, we decided this is all inspired.
01:56:29.000 It all has to mean the same thing, more or less.
01:56:33.000 They weren't as strict about it as we are today about it.
01:56:35.000 Today, about it.
01:56:36.000 But that means you have to create ways to harmonize problematic passages.
01:56:40.000 You have to come up with a way to interpret two passages that conflict in a way that allows them to not conflict anymore.
01:56:48.000 And so you're generating a kind of second order story.
01:56:52.000 And that is what is authoritative.
01:56:54.000 It's not the text itself that's authoritative, it's the interpretation that is authoritative, the interpretation that allows the text to all be consistent.
01:57:02.000 And the word I use is univocal.
01:57:05.000 It speaks with one single, consistent, unified voice from one single, unified, and consistent perspective.
01:57:11.000 So, when we get to hell in the New Testament, scholars suggest there are three different ideas about post mortem divine punishment that seem to be represented there.
01:57:20.000 One is annihilation, that the wicked just cease to exist.
01:57:25.000 One is temporary conscious torment followed by either salvation or annihilation.
01:57:30.000 So, you go somewhere, you're punished for a little bit, and then you cease to exist, or you go somewhere, you're punished for a little bit, you've paid your price, you now go on to salvation.
01:57:38.000 And then the third idea is eternal conscious torment, which is where you are tortured forever.
01:57:44.000 Now, in my opinion, and there are scholars who have done a lot more work on the development of the concept of hell than I have.
01:57:52.000 Candida Moss is a wonderful example.
01:57:54.000 But in my opinion, hell originally developed as a way to feel good about the fact that these huge empires and these wicked emperors, they're going to get theirs.
01:58:05.000 So I think that hell probably initially developed as a way to feel like God's justice.
01:58:12.000 Is going to have its day on the truly wicked people of the world.
01:58:17.000 But the distance between your average Judean and hell probably got smaller and smaller over time because the threat of hell became a useful stick in the hands of people who wanted to influence behavior.
01:58:35.000 And so by the time we get to Augustine in the fourth, fifth century CE and Christianity is trying to nail down its doctrines.
01:58:44.000 I think we probably get to the point where everybody is under threat of going to hell unless you do the thing.
01:58:51.000 Because originally it probably wasn't you have to do the thing or you go to hell.
01:58:54.000 Originally it was we're good over here.
01:58:58.000 The wicked people over there who are beating up on us, they're going to go to hell.
01:59:02.000 We're going to be saved.
01:59:03.000 And then it became everybody's potentially going to hell unless you do the thing.
01:59:10.000 So I think the gap closed over time.
01:59:13.000 I think in the New Testament you have inconsistent ideas about what post mortem divine punishment is going to be like.
01:59:19.000 And I think it becomes formalized and systematized by the Christian church in the centuries after the completion of the New Testament.
01:59:30.000 And then it also tracks with human ideology and what we know about people today, moving goalposts.
01:59:36.000 Oh, yeah.
01:59:36.000 Yeah.
01:59:36.000 A hundred percent.
01:59:37.000 Because something I'm fond of saying is that what is authoritative changes.
01:59:43.000 It always changes based on our reception of the received tradition, which we then have to negotiate with.
01:59:51.000 In light of our social, historical, rhetorical circumstances and what we want for the future.
01:59:59.000 And so there are hard won and really deeply held beliefs that people will abandon in a moment if their circumstances change enough to incentivize them to abandon those beliefs.
02:00:17.000 And as groups pass through time and their circumstances change and their needs change.
02:00:23.000 They're constantly renegotiating their tradition.
02:00:26.000 their tradition.
02:00:27.000 And yeah, that results in things like everybody's under threat of hell and, oh, Jesus is the only way, therefore you have to follow Jesus or you're going to hell.
02:00:39.000 And I think that's a post-biblical thing.
02:00:42.000 Certainly some folks who wrote the New Testament, I'm sure that if they were asked that, they would have been like, yeah, I would agree with that.
02:00:51.000 But it's not something that's ever stated anywhere in the New Testament, at least not in those words.
02:00:56.000 I think it's something that we have to Read into the text afterwards.
02:00:59.000 Well, it's very disturbing to people today.
02:01:01.000 It doesn't even make sense.
02:01:02.000 Like, what if I'm - because the idea that secular people can't be good people seems absurd.
02:01:06.000 Aaron Ross Powell, Jr.
02:01:08.000 Yeah.
02:01:08.000 I'm kind of - the fact that there are an awful lot of folks within Christianity who are trying to draw a harder line between the believers and the non-believers - including biblical scholars, which is really weird.
02:01:19.000 It's really weird when you study it, but yet you find things to sort of reinforce your beliefs instead of - Being objective about the interpretations and how complex this all is.
02:01:33.000 Trevor Burrus Well, and it's phenomenally difficult to be objective because we are experiencing the world.
02:01:40.000 We're not experiencing it directly in an unmediated way.
02:01:44.000 Our intuitive cognition is governing everything.
02:01:48.000 So when we're reading a text that's supposed to be important to our in group, the set of identities that are mine, it's phenomenally difficult to read it in a way that crosses, goes against the grain of what our groups tell us.
02:02:04.000 In fact, I wonder if I can illustrate how our intuitive cognition is governing everything.
02:02:11.000 Could you pull up an image?
02:02:12.000 Could you Google corn sweet illusion?
02:02:16.000 So it's one word, corn sweet.
02:02:18.000 Sweet like candy?
02:02:21.000 S-W-E-E-T, yeah.
02:02:23.000 And this is an illusion I use a lot because it's going to demonstrate that there's somebody at the controls.
02:02:32.000 That we don't know about and that we can't control.
02:02:34.000 Okay, right, that one right there.
02:02:36.000 So it looks like a dark object on top of a light object.
02:02:40.000 Right.
02:02:40.000 But if you use your hand, cover up the shadows and the highlight in the middle and.
02:02:46.000 You in the center?
02:02:48.000 Oh, I was trying to.
02:02:49.000 Yeah, like just if you just hold up your hand and cover up the shadows and the highlight.
02:02:53.000 Oh, that's crazy.
02:02:54.000 They're the exact same shade of gray.
02:02:56.000 That is fucking nuts.
02:02:58.000 And so what's going on?
02:02:59.000 That's the weirdest thing I've ever seen in my life.
02:03:01.000 That's crazy.
02:03:02.000 Jamie, try it.
02:03:04.000 I've seen, I know, yeah.
02:03:05.000 I've done this before.
02:03:06.000 That's literally crazy, though.
02:03:08.000 And we know why this happens.
02:03:09.000 Why?
02:03:09.000 It happens because your mind thinks it's looking at an object in space.
02:03:13.000 And objects in space, as we know from a whole lifetime of experience, when they're in the sun, they're lighter, and when they're in the shade, they're darker.
02:03:22.000 And so this is toying with us by making them the exact same shade of gray.
02:03:27.000 So the part of our brain that is in charge of how we perceive things is saying this does not compute.
02:03:33.000 Okay, I'm just going to make it look like this.
02:03:37.000 Just keep it big, please.
02:03:39.000 That is so insane.
02:03:40.000 If you go halfway through, it starts to change.
02:03:43.000 Like if you put your finger over it, just a little bit of it, it stays white and dark.
02:03:48.000 And then as you move it across, you can see it change.
02:03:52.000 And there are a lot of people for whom it's slightly different.
02:03:56.000 It depends on your experiences.
02:03:58.000 But basically, you have someone rifling through the mail of your senses.
02:04:03.000 And this is our one?
02:04:05.000 Well, our intuitive cognition, our mind.
02:04:07.000 And this mind is saying, this does not match what I expect, so I'm changing what you're going to experience.
02:04:14.000 So, this is true of all of our senses.
02:04:17.000 All of our senses.
02:04:19.000 There's a fascinating story of there's a neuroscientist, V.S. Ramachandran.
02:04:26.000 He's written some wonderful books.
02:04:27.000 One of them is called The Phantoms in the Brain, the other is called The Telltale Brain.
02:04:31.000 But he shares this story about when he was working with people who had phantom limb pain.
02:04:38.000 And there's a particular type of phantom limb pain for folks who are missing the bottom part of their arm, where they would report feeling like their fist was clenched so tightly that their fingernails were digging through the flesh of their palm.
02:04:52.000 And it was just excruciating pain, but there was nothing there.
02:04:55.000 And he devised an instrument to try to treat this.
02:05:00.000 He got a box and cut some holes in the box and put a mirror inside so that when the person put their existing hand in one hole and then their absent hand in the other, they would look at the mirror and they would see two hands.
02:05:14.000 And then he would say, Clench your fist.
02:05:17.000 And they would see two fists clench.
02:05:19.000 And then he'd say, Release your fist.
02:05:22.000 And then the pain would go away.
02:05:24.000 For some people.
02:05:25.000 And the idea there is that your brain is creating that pain because of something not going right.
02:05:32.000 And even though you know you're fooling your brain, you're tricking your senses into believing that your phantom limb that is in so much pain is actually now releasing that fist.
02:05:46.000 And there's just so much about the way the brain works that shows we are not experiencing the world in an unmediated way.
02:05:55.000 Evolution has given us lenses that.
02:05:58.000 That helps us experience in a way that is going to make it more likely for us to live long enough to pass on our genes.
02:06:04.000 But also, a big part of that is survival within a society.
02:06:08.000 And so, our identity politics are also a big part of how we not only experience the world but think about things, and particularly things like values and things like that.
02:06:19.000 So, there's a wonderful book by a guy named Jonathan Haight called Have You Heard of?
02:06:23.000 I've read him on a few times.
02:06:24.000 Okay, yeah.
02:06:25.000 So, you probably talked about his book, The Righteous Mind, at some point.
02:06:29.000 And he talks quite a bit about that.
02:06:29.000 Yeah.
02:06:31.000 He uses a metaphor.
02:06:31.000 Of an elephant and a rider, where you have this quick, kind of intuitive mind that we're not in control of.
02:06:40.000 And then you have the quick, intuitive one, it's been a while since I've read his metaphor, but his particular metaphor distinguishes our intuitive cognition, which we don't really have control over, and usually we're not even aware it's happening, and our conscious, what we call reflective cognition, which is where we're reasoning.
02:06:59.000 And frequently our intuitive cognition kind of Influences our reflective reasoning.
02:07:05.000 So, if we like something, if we like a political candidate, if we like a particular interpretation of the Bible because that serves our interests within the communities that are important to us, we're going to be loath to accept a different interpretation that complicates things for us.
02:07:20.000 That's our intuitive cognition trying to protect us socially, and it causes all kinds of problems.
02:07:27.000 Everybody has it, nobody's immune to it.
02:07:30.000 Well, I think a good example of that is this Lindsey Clancy thing.
02:07:33.000 This woman who killed her kids.
02:07:37.000 There's people that sympathize with her and want to visit her at the courthouse and say she didn't get enough care and they're wearing the pink t-shirts.
02:07:47.000 Then there's people that think she's a monster and she should be killed.
02:07:51.000 The people that believe that one juror was wrong in not releasing her or not convicting her by reasons of insanity, those people are.
02:08:04.000 So firmly entrenched in this ideology that they are incapable of seeing other people's positions.
02:08:10.000 Other people's positions.
02:08:12.000 And this is one of the reasons that we try so hard to ensure that when we put people on a jury, they're not already deeply entrenched in one side or another because they then become so impossible to convince of whatever may or may not be the truth.
02:08:28.000 So, yeah, it is problematic, but we all experience the world in different ways.
02:08:32.000 And nobody is in charge of how we experience the world.
02:08:35.000 Right, and there's no way you could really truly understand how another person is seeing the world.
02:08:40.000 You're guessing.
02:08:41.000 I'm guessing you see the world the way I do.
02:08:44.000 And that's a common assumption that I experience it a certain way, therefore everybody else is going to experience it a certain way.
02:08:44.000 Yeah.
02:08:50.000 And an arrogance that people love to pursue that you should experience the world the way I do.
02:08:54.000 And that's where a lot of projection comes in.
02:08:56.000 Yeah.
02:08:57.000 That's where we draw conclusions about somebody else's motivations because it might be our motivations.
02:09:02.000 Of course.
02:09:02.000 And sometimes, yeah, that causes an awful lot of problems.
02:09:07.000 And again, nobody's immune to it.
02:09:09.000 Are susceptible to our intuitive cognition, and we just have to try to at least what I try to do is become aware of when it's led me wrong and then try to correct for that.
02:09:20.000 You can only be fixing it looking back.
02:09:22.000 You can't really like the illusion, you can't turn that off.
02:09:26.000 You can't say, I'm now going to stop seeing it that way.
02:09:29.000 It doesn't work like that.
02:09:30.000 Trevor Burrus Yeah, you can make attempts, but then you have to also make sure that you don't defend faulty thinking.
02:09:35.000 That's a thing that people love to do.
02:09:39.000 They love to go back and no, no, no.
02:09:42.000 And come up with some reason why.
02:09:44.000 Yeah.
02:09:44.000 In cognitive science, there are two ways that we refer to what happens when our intuitive cognition conflicts with our reflective cognition.
02:09:52.000 You've got decoupling, which is where your reflective cognition overrules the intuitive.
02:09:57.000 So if you're asleep at night and you hear a bang and then you realize, okay, that's probably just the furnace kicking on or something like that, that's your reflective cognition saying, go back to bed, intuitive cognition.
02:10:11.000 And then the other is rationalization.
02:10:12.000 And that's where you use your reflective cognition to try to defend and rationalize the intuitive cognition, even though it may be entirely wrong.
02:10:22.000 Which is something we really should have all been taught in school.
02:10:25.000 They're still doing so much research on it.
02:10:26.000 It changes so much that, yeah, every At least the concepts of understanding why you form decisions.
02:10:33.000 Absolutely, yeah.
02:10:34.000 And why we're so vulnerable to falling into the smooth grooves of ideology.
02:10:39.000 And I think one of the big problems is frequently ideology is what put people who make those decisions where they are.
02:10:48.000 Yes.
02:10:49.000 And then again, what we talked about before charisma and confidence and your decisions when most people don't have confidence in their version of the world.
02:10:58.000 It's so chaotic.
02:10:59.000 You are a religious man.
02:11:01.000 I am.
02:11:01.000 So I find that interesting because you study all this stuff and you're trying to get to the root of it all.
02:11:12.000 What is your version of this?
02:11:13.000 My version of this is kind of like what Russell Crowe says in Gladiator.
02:11:19.000 That's for me and my wife.
02:11:21.000 No, I don't talk publicly about my own personal faith just because I try to keep it compartmentalized from what I'm doing professionally and online so that I can keep the main thing the main thing because an awful lot of people just want to tear into whatever it is going on in here that allows me to share these things while acting.
02:11:43.000 Oh, for sure.
02:11:43.000 Practicing.
02:11:45.000 They want to dismiss you.
02:11:47.000 Yeah.
02:11:48.000 And so I've said from the very beginning that's off limits.
02:11:52.000 I just don't talk about that.
02:11:53.000 And in no small part because I do believe that it is as Jesus in the New Testament says when you pray, go into your closet and pray in secret, and your Father will reward you openly.
02:12:05.000 And pray in secret, and your father will reward you openly.
02:12:08.000 And don't pray as the hypocrites who are on the street corner to be seen of men because they have their reward.
02:12:16.000 And the more I study religion and how it functions, and the fact that those costly signals are such an important element of lived religion, the less I want to be involved in going out there and shouting on the street corner about my faith.
02:12:34.000 So I've kind of leaned into it, I'm keeping this for me because I think it makes it.
02:12:39.000 It makes me more effective as a scholar who is trying to communicate publicly about religion, and it also has become a more meaningful way for me to live it privately where I could be out in public influencing a lot of things religiously.
02:12:57.000 I think that would be an abuse of the platform that I'm trying to build here.
02:13:03.000 That's a very admirable position in my perspective.
02:13:06.000 Aaron Ross Powell, Jr.
02:13:06.000 I am glad I've made it sound that way.
02:13:08.000 No, I think I do.
02:13:08.000 Aaron Ross Powell, Jr.
02:13:10.000 I would think it's very admirable because I have a real problem with.
02:13:13.000 The proselytizing.
02:13:14.000 Not just that, but the real issue is the hypocritical nature of a lot of the humans that are involved in promoting whatever their version or projecting in a very performative way whatever their version of whatever religion it is.
02:13:32.000 That they wear it like a shield of virtue.
02:13:35.000 Yeah, and that's really when we get into the New Testament, that's precisely what Jesus was criticizing.
02:13:42.000 There's a concept called the prophetic critique.
02:13:46.000 that we find in some of the prophetic literature in the Hebrew Bible that's kind of picked up again in the New Testament.
02:13:53.000 And while there are definitely problems with the authors who are responsible for spreading this, because they are somewhat hypocritical themselves, I think the message is an interesting one.
02:14:04.000 Because the prophetic critique is basically God saying, I hate your worship.
02:14:08.000 I hate your new moons and your Sabbaths.
02:14:11.000 And I don't delight in the blood of bulls.
02:14:13.000 And I will have mercy and not sacrifice.
02:14:15.000 And that's what gets quoted twice in Matthew.
02:14:18.000 And there's a whole series of passages from Isaiah and from Micah and from Amos and from elsewhere where it sounds like God is saying, I hate all the stuff I commanded you to do.
02:14:29.000 And so scholars for a while have been like, well, why would God hate the rituals that God commanded?
02:14:34.000 And I think the best answer to that is that what they then go on to say is, I want justice and I want mercy and I want righteousness.
02:14:43.000 And what seems to be in the crosshairs is people who go out and put on display their piety so that they can benefit from publicly being pious, but then behind everybody's back in secret, they're actually undermining what their religion demands of them, whether that be kindness to the immigrants or supporting the poor or whatever it is.
02:15:12.000 And in the Hebrew Bible, you have talk about grinding the faces of the poor and you multiply your houses, which is talking about land consolidation, basically exploiting poor people and stealing their land.
02:15:22.000 And all kinds of different ways that they exploit the economic system and the justice system and all this stuff.
02:15:27.000 And then they go offer sacrifices to show everybody that they're following God.
02:15:31.000 And Jesus says one of the things that Jesus says that I think kind of puts on display what's going on here is he accuses some people of tithing mint and dill and then says, but you neglect the weightier matters of the law.
02:15:46.000 And he says you should be doing both.
02:15:48.000 And the weightier matters of the law are mercy, justice, righteousness, basically ensuring that we live in a righteous society.
02:15:55.000 Righteous society where people are not killed, are not underprivileged, are not facing additional obstacles only because of the circumstances that they were born into.
02:16:10.000 This is a negotiation with the text as well.
02:16:14.000 I'm kind of interpreting all these passages for you, but I think the idea there is don't practice your religion in public to serve your own benefit, your own needs, while then going around screwing over all the people around you.
02:16:28.000 When your religion actually expects you to be taking care of them as well.
02:16:33.000 In fact, if Jesus is right, those are the weightier matters.
02:16:36.000 That's more important.
02:16:38.000 You should be concerned more about what's going on with the people around you than with getting more clicks, more views, more money, more power, more influence from going out and publicly saying the right thing or doing the right ritual or whatever.
02:16:57.000 Which is one of the weirdest aspects of us being supposedly a Christian nation, but not.
02:17:02.000 Developing any of our inner cities, not taking care of any of our areas that we've had in this country that have been crime ridden and impoverished for decade upon decade and give it no attention.
02:17:16.000 And we kind of designed the inner cities specifically to trap certain people in them.
02:17:22.000 And then we now are saying, well, you got there yourself.
02:17:22.000 Redlining.
02:17:26.000 You deal with it.
02:17:27.000 And redlining continues to this day.
02:17:30.000 There are lawsuits active right now related to redlining.
02:17:33.000 So, yeah, I think a lot of people want to ignore that there are systems in play.
02:17:36.000 That benefits certain people and that don't benefit other folks.
02:17:41.000 And the folks who benefit from these systems are like, oh, I don't see no systems.
02:17:44.000 We're all just individuals here.
02:17:46.000 And I don't harbor any hate in my heart, but I'm not changing that system.
02:17:50.000 And the idea of a meritocracy.
02:17:50.000 Right.
02:17:52.000 Meritocracy would be great if everybody started at the same starting line.
02:17:56.000 But to take into consideration the fact that there's people in our country forget about let's fix the rest of the world.
02:17:56.000 Yeah, absolutely.
02:18:04.000 We haven't even started in our country to take care of these areas.
02:18:09.000 I don't know how much you travel internationally.
02:18:11.000 A little bit.
02:18:13.000 A little bit.
02:18:14.000 I frequently will go someplace new and come back, like, wow, they do this thing so well over there.
02:18:20.000 And I wish I could.
02:18:20.000 Like what?
02:18:21.000 Right now, my big thing is walkability.
02:18:23.000 Like, go into a village in the English countryside or something like that, where, or even some of their cities, some of their bigger cities, you can walk around.
02:18:34.000 Like, it's the place is not set up for cars.
02:18:38.000 Oh, yeah, we also better put a sidewalk in there.
02:18:41.000 They're designed around.
02:18:42.000 People walking, riding, walking.
02:18:45.000 It's a lot older, and we have some old places in the U.S. that are very much like that, but more and more our new cities that are popping up are not designed for people to walk around in.
02:18:59.000 They're designed for people to drive around in, and if you're walking, you've got to be careful because you're going to get hit by a car.
02:19:04.000 Or you've got to Well, Los Angeles is the best example of that.
02:19:08.000 Los Angeles is really hard to walk in.
02:19:10.000 Yeah.
02:19:11.000 It's not a walking city.
02:19:12.000 New York City is very much a walking city, which is really crazy because it's more congested.
02:19:17.000 Or more compressed, I should say.
02:19:18.000 More people in a smaller area, but yet much easier to get around walking.
02:19:23.000 And when I lived in, I lived just outside of Oxford when I was going to school there.
02:19:23.000 Yeah.
02:19:29.000 Like that's walking around that city is a completely different experience from any place I've been in the U.S., which is why I think they designed Yale after it to try to mimic that.
02:19:38.000 But that's just one example of I'll come back from somewhere and be like, man, I wish we could do this here.
02:19:46.000 And there are so many things I think we could do here.
02:19:49.000 We have the capacity to do here.
02:19:51.000 We have the capacity to do here.
02:19:51.000 Could do here.
02:19:54.000 We just don't have the desire.
02:19:56.000 Because they get too caught up in the wrangling over power.
02:20:00.000 Well, not only that, they're allocating so much money to other things.
02:20:03.000 The idea that saying, like, let's cut the Pentagon's budget, but let's dump all this money into Detroit and Baltimore and fill in the blank, whatever impoverished city you have, and have a systematic sort of a plan from A to B. Be of how we are going to change the economic outcomes of all the people that live there, how we're going to improve the education, stop the crime, what we're going to do to provide more opportunities, more safety.
02:20:32.000 What are we going to do?
02:20:34.000 I think so many of the debates are really over symptoms.
02:20:34.000 Yeah.
02:20:37.000 And really, we need to be treating the root cause.
02:20:41.000 That's a great way to put it.
02:20:43.000 And that is systemic.
02:20:44.000 That is something that we ought to.
02:20:46.000 But I'm not a politician or a city planner.
02:20:47.000 I'm not either.
02:20:49.000 One of those either.
02:20:50.000 It's probably a good thing.
02:20:51.000 Yeah, thank God.
02:20:53.000 It's very complicated though.
02:20:54.000 I mean, and it's just weird how we consider ourselves a Christian nation, but we don't do those things, and that no one ever holds you to task for that.
02:21:07.000 No one never says that.
02:21:08.000 That's never a talking point for someone running for election saying there's an issue that we can take care of in this country that will radically transform what this entire society looks like in 100 years for the better.
02:21:23.000 And my perspective has always been if you want to make America great again, what's the best way?
02:21:28.000 Well, less losers.
02:21:30.000 So, what's the best way to have less losers?
02:21:34.000 Have more people, have more opportunities, more education, and more safety.
02:21:37.000 So, then you would automatically have more people succeed, more people contribute.
02:21:42.000 Who knows how many more inventions, more innovation, more ideas, more art, more fill in the blank.
02:21:49.000 I think I sometimes wonder how many Isaac Newtons or Thomas Edison's lived and died.
02:21:56.000 In poverty in an inner city somewhere because they were never given the opportunity to go gain the resources and the access to the resources that they needed to flourish.
02:22:08.000 And it's because we, yeah, it's a big problem that unfortunately we, what is the, there was a saying that I thought was apropos there and I completely forget it.
02:22:22.000 So that's, or I completely forgot it.
02:22:24.000 So that's not helpful.
02:22:25.000 But yeah, this is a problem I think a lot of people recognize.
02:22:28.000 But unfortunately, When it comes to actually trying to do something about it, we have to get past the problem of the people in power are really there to be in power more commonly than they're there to fix problems.
02:22:42.000 Trevor Burrus And their motivation is to keep us at each other's throats.
02:22:44.000 They would like us to keep arguing and fighting with each other and to keep looking at each other as the other so that they don't have to change anything really and just offer these fake solutions and then when they get in the office, they don't do anything to change it.
02:22:56.000 Trevor Burrus Yeah.
02:22:57.000 Fun.
02:22:57.000 But in the meanwhile, there's your YouTube channel.
02:23:01.000 There's plenty of things that are interesting and beautiful in the world today.
02:23:06.000 And I think it's, you know, I was just talking about this yesterday.
02:23:10.000 I'm reading this Alan Watts book from 1952.
02:23:12.000 And it's so interesting because he's talking about the age of anxiety in 1952, about how much things are changing, how much the world is changing.
02:23:25.000 And it sounds like he's talking about 2026.
02:23:27.000 And like, this is constant.
02:23:29.000 This never ends.
02:23:30.000 Yeah.
02:23:31.000 And it's a slow sort of like.
02:23:35.000 Two steps up, one step back, three steps up, two steps back.
02:23:39.000 Back three steps up, two steps back.
02:23:41.000 There's this constant changing of what we are in the culture.
02:23:46.000 And generally, like if you look at Pinker's work and a lot of it, generally seems to be for the better.
02:23:52.000 But while you're in the middle of it, it seems helpless and you seem confused and scattered.
02:23:58.000 And meanwhile, if you ask people, especially like boomers, like when was a time when everything made sense?
02:24:04.000 Boy, during the 1950s, we all knew what a man was and a woman was.
02:24:09.000 And you went and you did your job and you raised your kids, and the guy delivered milk.
02:24:14.000 And they had this rose colored glasses perspective of the past.
02:24:19.000 But meanwhile, Alan's writing this book in 1952 about how it's the age of anxiety.
02:24:25.000 And it's fascinating.
02:24:26.000 It's a time machine into this particular period in history that, at least in terms of the things that he's describing, mirror some of the issues we're dealing with today.
02:24:26.000 Yeah.
02:24:38.000 He's like literally talking about technology and improvement of society and all these different things that are like the changing of the family and what it means.
02:24:46.000 And it's like, this is wild.
02:24:48.000 He's literally talking like it never ends.
02:24:50.000 It never ends.
02:24:51.000 It just has a different title.
02:24:52.000 It just looks different, smells different, it dances different.
02:24:56.000 And I'm sure in 75 years there will be people look back on now and be like, we sure made a ton of money off of AI or off of exploiting this or that resource.
02:24:56.000 It's the same animal.
02:25:06.000 Perhaps.
02:25:06.000 And there will be, there are a lot of people look back and be like, I remember it differently.
02:25:10.000 And we were not the recipients of all that funding that the government was handing out, just like there were a lot of people who were not the recipients of funding.
02:25:18.000 Back in post World War II America.
02:25:22.000 And there are others who were the recipients of an awful lot of funding.
02:25:22.000 Yeah.
02:25:26.000 So, yeah, I think it goes back to the systemic issues that we have with our goals and who's making those decisions.
02:25:34.000 And goes back to why I am not a politician or a city planner.
02:25:40.000 Even though I did run for my state legislature twice.
02:25:43.000 Did you?
02:25:44.000 What were you trying to.
02:25:44.000 Yeah.
02:25:47.000 Well, I was trying to mainly annoy the.
02:25:50.000 The two incumbents, and also just try to move the needle a little bit.
02:25:56.000 I live in a very, very conservative part of Salt Lake County, and I had, I think, a 50 point deficit to make up against the state rep, and then a 40 point deficit to make up against the state senator.
02:26:08.000 And I think I took around 16 points off of both of them.
02:26:12.000 So I did make a little bit of progress, but that was a bizarre experience.
02:26:15.000 And now I think both of them are gone.
02:26:22.000 One of them resigned, I think, the term after. That election and the other resigned just, I believe, last year or so.
02:26:30.000 And now we just had another state senator who had some felony charges against him for fraud.
02:26:37.000 Oh, fun.
02:26:38.000 Yeah.
02:26:38.000 Well, that is the real problem the type of people that want to run for office are almost all out of their fucking minds for the most part, other than people that are just trying to shake things up, like yourself.
02:26:50.000 I think the people who are doing it for reasons that are going to be beneficial to others are in the minority.
02:26:58.000 Unfortunately.
02:26:58.000 For sure.
02:26:59.000 Yeah.
02:26:59.000 Yeah.
02:27:00.000 Well, maybe that'll change over time.
02:27:02.000 You know, maybe with more conversations like this and more people realizing that if we keep going in the same direction that we're going now, we're not going to ever improve.
02:27:12.000 But it's always there, it's always available.
02:27:15.000 There are people out there that think differently.
02:27:17.000 It's not like these are alien ideas that most people are not willing to even consider.
02:27:22.000 Most people listen to what you're saying, what I'm saying, and they're probably thinking, yeah, that would probably be better for everybody.
02:27:28.000 Yeah.
02:27:28.000 Except the incredibly rich people that control the defense contracting companies.
02:27:33.000 Yeah.
02:27:34.000 Yeah.
02:27:35.000 And also, it's one thing to be sitting down and wherever you listen to this podcast and hear these ideas.
02:27:41.000 It's another when you're in the thick of things and suddenly you're getting defensive about your position or getting critical of another's position.
02:27:50.000 It's once the rubber hits the road, that's where it becomes difficult and where it becomes a lot harder than it is to sit across a table and say, yeah, we agree on this.
02:27:59.000 It's also like you and I, I could tell from you, you're very careful with the way you think about things.
02:27:59.000 Yeah.
02:28:06.000 And you're very objective and you try to analyze things and find out why you think about things.
02:28:10.000 There's a lot of people that have not learned that skill.
02:28:14.000 It's unfortunate.
02:28:15.000 Yeah.
02:28:15.000 And again, it's not really taught.
02:28:17.000 And you might grow up in an environment within a family that is like very rigid in their belief system and very angry if you deviate from that.
02:28:27.000 And it's a lot of times people just to fit in, they just adhere.
02:28:33.000 And it's easier to get the Ten Commandments in a school than a critical thinking.
02:28:36.000 Yeah.
02:28:37.000 Class.
02:28:38.000 Yes.
02:28:39.000 Yeah.
02:28:39.000 I had Talarico on and we were talking about that.
02:28:41.000 And he made a very good point, I think, that that's going to push people away from Christianity.
02:28:46.000 And, you know, and people have resisted that.
02:28:49.000 I'm like, but no one wants to be told, like, in a school that's supposed to, we're supposed to separate school.
02:28:55.000 Like, you don't want them teaching Islamic tenets in your school, right?
02:29:02.000 Because, well, this is a Christian nation.
02:29:02.000 Right.
02:29:04.000 Okay.
02:29:06.000 It's also, it's, well, it's not.
02:29:08.000 It's a nation of humans.
02:29:10.000 Okay.
02:29:10.000 And, Freedom is supposed to be one of the things that the right in particular is supposed to hold dear.
02:29:16.000 Freedom.
02:29:17.000 They love to say that.
02:29:17.000 Well, freedom also means freedom to not be indoctrinated with other people's ideology.
02:29:24.000 Even if you believe that this is the truth, this is the light, they need to learn this, well, make your argument.
02:29:30.000 Make it very compelling and do it by example also.
02:29:33.000 Be someone who is admirable in the way you behave and think and talk and the way you live.
02:29:40.000 A year after I'd been baptized as a Latter-day Saint, I went out on my mission.
02:29:45.000 I got a set of scriptures.
02:29:48.000 And the first thing I wrote in the inside cover was a quote that I've always loved.
02:29:53.000 A good example is the best preacher.
02:29:55.000 And I've always tried to live by that.
02:29:58.000 And when it comes to the U.S. as a Christian nation, I can understand Tallarico's concern for what that's going to do to Christianity.
02:30:07.000 And absolutely, I understand that we don't want the state indoctrinating our children.
02:30:13.000 And one concern I see getting brought up less is what it does to someone who's in the minority for them to go to state sponsored education and have the states tell them, you are unwanted here.
02:30:26.000 We are this.
02:30:28.000 You are not that.
02:30:29.000 We're going to let you be here, but know that you're a second class citizen.
02:30:33.000 And I don't think that is certainly not a comfortable situation to be attending school and probably not a safe situation in a lot of ways for attending school.
02:30:43.000 And at the same time, if people are indoctrinated and do adopt.
02:30:47.000 Christianity as a result of that, that's not really a desirable conversion in my mind.
02:30:53.000 Oh, the state wants me to be Christian, so I'm going to be a Christian because I'm doing what the state is.
02:30:57.000 For your own safety, you've adopted it.
02:30:59.000 You've adopted it so that you can benefit from the resources that you are given access to.
02:31:05.000 Or just to stay safe.
02:31:06.000 And this is the same argument they would make if you were in a school district that adopted an Islamic education system and was under Sharia law.
02:31:15.000 You'd be like, no, this is not freedom.
02:31:16.000 And I think the Confederate statues, these came up in the early 20th century, and we know explicitly the goal was to terrorize the black population, to let them know who was in charge around here.
02:31:29.000 In charge around here.
02:31:30.000 Not only that, they were shitty statues.
02:31:33.000 They weren't even, this is the thing, like people were defending it.
02:31:35.000 Like the removal, I don't think they should be removed, but I think people should understand why they were put there in the first place.
02:31:41.000 But they wanted kids walking to school, little black children walking to school and seeing this explicitly white supremacist statue so that they knew we honor this or this is at least who we are, just so you know for the future.
02:31:55.000 Just keep that in mind as you grow up in our state.
02:31:59.000 Yeah, that conversation was lost in the outrage over the removal of the statues.
02:32:03.000 Well, it had to be for the removal to be defended.
02:32:07.000 They couldn't allow that conversation to happen.
02:32:11.000 But listen, man, I really love your channel.
02:32:14.000 It's fucking awesome.
02:32:15.000 I've had countless hours listening to you and watching you, so I really appreciate what you're doing.
02:32:21.000 I know it's a long road to learn all the shit that you've learned.
02:32:26.000 It has been, but it's been a lot of fun, and I wanted to give you this as well.
02:32:29.000 This is a book that I published last year.
02:32:31.000 It's called The Bible Says So What We Get Right and Wrong About Scripture's Most Controversial Issues.
02:32:36.000 It's basically a greatest hits book.
02:32:38.000 Of what I've done on my channel.
02:32:42.000 So I don't know how much you enjoy reading hard copies of books.
02:32:46.000 It's great to put me to bed.
02:32:46.000 I do.
02:32:49.000 It's not like reading a book that makes you sleepy.
02:32:52.000 Yeah.
02:32:53.000 When Joel McHale gave me one of the blurbs for my book and I was like, you want a hard copy?
02:32:58.000 He's like, I'll take the audiobook.
02:33:00.000 Yeah.
02:33:01.000 Did you read the audiobook?
02:33:02.000 I did.
02:33:03.000 Yeah.
02:33:03.000 Oh, of course.
02:33:04.000 So I recorded that.
02:33:05.000 I'm working on another one right now that's going to be.
02:33:07.000 It's going.
02:33:09.000 Basically, I'm going to talk about how the God of the Bible changes from the earliest parts of the Bible to the latest parts of the Bible.
02:33:15.000 So, right now, we're going with God's biography of biblical history.
02:33:18.000 But I'm really enjoying writing.
02:33:21.000 Well, what little I've been able to write of it, I've really been enjoying.
02:33:23.000 How far out do you think this one is?
02:33:25.000 Further out than my contract wants it to be, probably.
02:33:29.000 Isn't that always key?
02:33:31.000 Always key.
02:33:31.000 Yeah, I've got.
02:33:32.000 We've been dealing with a lot of stuff in my household medical stuff, school stuff, and we're also finishing our basement right now.
02:33:41.000 I haven't had as much time as I would like to.
02:33:41.000 And so.
02:33:44.000 And this is for my publisher.
02:33:45.000 So when I come and say, I don't know if I'm going to be on time, I have reasons.
02:33:50.000 But hopefully it should be out the beginning of 2028.
02:33:54.000 Okay.
02:33:55.000 That's, yeah.
02:33:56.000 And it's another book I think is going to blow a lot of people's minds if they sit down and give it a chance.
02:34:02.000 Because the more we, like you talk about how that book about 1950s and how it was Age of Anxiety, it's unlike how we picture things.
02:34:14.000 Yeah, just so people know what I'm talking about, I'll give you the title of the book.
02:34:18.000 It's called The Wisdom of Insecurity.
02:34:23.000 Okay.
02:34:23.000 A message for an age of anxiety.
02:34:26.000 And the point I want to make is that there are people who lived that, who are still around, who can talk about it, but that's not how we tend to represent that time period.
02:34:37.000 That's not how we tend to think about it.
02:34:38.000 And if we go back 2,200, 2,500 years, our reconstruction of that history. Is even further removed from how we tend to think about it.
02:34:49.000 And the deeper we dig into the data, the more information we have to understand what was going on.
02:34:58.000 And anybody who wants to actually try to understand what's going on, you have to let these kinds of things inform your reconstruction.
02:35:05.000 Otherwise, it's just ideology.
02:35:07.000 Otherwise, it's just dogma.
02:35:09.000 Dogma.
02:35:12.000 And that's the name of my podcast, Data Over Dogma, which is all about trying to ensure that we're letting the data set the terms for the discussion rather than the ideologies, the things that we want to happen, the dogmas that we bring to it, rather than ensuring that they're setting the terms for the discussion.
02:35:31.000 Awesome.
02:35:32.000 Hey, thank you very much.
02:35:33.000 Thanks for all you do, and I really enjoyed this conversation.
02:35:35.000 Thank you very much.
02:35:36.000 Appreciate it.
02:35:38.000 Bye.