The Matt Walsh Show - Ep. 1850 - New Evidence in the Cornell 7 Case Completely Blows The Accuser's Story

00:00:00.000 You know what's wild? Most people are still overpaying for car insurance just because it's

00:00:05.140 a pain to switch. That's why there's Jerry. Jerry is the only app that compares rates for over 50

00:00:11.200 insurers in minutes, and it helps you switch fast with no spam calls or hidden fees. Drivers who

00:00:17.140 save with Jerry could save over $1,300 a year. Before you renew your car insurance policy,

00:00:23.020 do yourself a favor. Download the Jerry app or head to jerry.ai slash wire.

00:00:27.880 A slew of text messages from the Cornell accuser have now been released, and they erase all doubt about what happened.

00:00:36.000 This woman, according to her own contemporaneous statements, consented to deviant sexual activity in a frat house.

00:00:43.100 And after the fact, she firmly believed that no crime had been committed.

00:00:47.340 She even stated that, quote, everyone needs to grow up because sexuality and sex is changing,

00:00:53.700 meaning that she saw her behavior as enlightened, as a feminist expression of her own freedom and

00:00:59.020 empowerment. And then not long afterwards, she began experiencing shame and humiliation when

00:01:03.820 the entire campus found out about what she did. She stated her reputation was destroyed

00:01:08.660 and accused a fraternity member of telling everyone what she had done. And the breaking

00:01:14.620 point came apparently when the fraternity disinvited her from their big Halloween party.

00:01:20.940 This was the single most important social event of the semester.

00:01:25.000 There's nothing more important to a college girl than the Halloween party.

00:01:29.700 And they made it very clear that they didn't want her to attend.

00:01:33.680 And she, you know, suddenly hearing this, she decided that she had been assaulted, retroactively withdrawing her consent long after the fact.

00:01:42.300 That was the moment when she decided that she would go scorched earth.

00:01:45.920 the second she was barred from a party at the very fraternity house where she supposedly was

00:01:52.040 abused. So think about that for a second. She was bitterly disappointed that she couldn't return to

00:01:58.580 the place where she was supposedly subjected to a brutal gang rape. Now, the very notion is

00:02:05.580 farcical, of course, but she understood that at a left-wing female-dominated campus like Cornell,

00:02:11.620 well, she could immediately regain the moral high ground if she lied about what happened,

00:02:16.920 even if her story made no sense. And she was right. We'll go into the text messages and

00:02:23.100 the whole timeline in just a moment. This is a case where facts matter, as they always do.

00:02:29.320 And we're going to show all the text messages in context to demonstrate that this woman is a liar.

00:02:36.660 The evidence is not a dispute.

00:02:39.260 No one can seriously take issue with any of it.

00:02:42.800 But first, it's important to establish at the outset that this case is not about one trashy woman at Cornell

00:02:48.360 or the male students who also engaged in depraved sex acts and drug use.

00:02:54.720 And it's not simply about due process and the seemingly non-existent rights of the accused,

00:03:00.140 although that's obviously a really important part of the story.

00:03:03.180 this woman is almost certainly going to be paid millions of dollars as a result of the con her

00:03:08.340 lawyers are running. The male students' lives will be destroyed, and we can expect a host of

00:03:13.300 false allegations in the coming months and years as a result. That's the expected outcome at this

00:03:18.800 point, and we shouldn't pretend otherwise. Everybody knows it. The more interesting

00:03:22.620 question is why this woman's story, as fantastical and self-contradictory as it is,

00:03:28.180 has resonated to such a great extent on the left with so many women all over the country.

00:03:34.280 Democrat politicians are falling over themselves to make this case into a campaign issue,

00:03:38.480 not because they have any principles, but because they're responding to the frenzy that their

00:03:42.600 female constituents in the Democrat Party are participating in. It's supply and demand.

00:03:48.720 There's a whole TikTok trend right now where women claimed to have been the victims of

00:03:52.760 some horrible crime many years after it supposedly happened. And why is this happening? I mean,

00:03:58.700 why did the accuser abruptly decide that she had been assaulted? And why are so many women

00:04:04.060 defending her, even after it's clear that she's lying? What we're seeing here is, among other

00:04:11.420 things, the failure of the left's consent-based morality. So they've chipped away at all sexual

00:04:18.160 morals for decades. They've systematically eliminated every moral rule and standard

00:04:23.440 governing, well, governing human behavior in general, but especially governing human sexuality.

00:04:30.460 And they have left consent as the only remaining rule, the only remaining principle.

00:04:37.960 But, you know, it turns out that sex can be degrading and bad even when it's consensual.

00:04:44.180 And when that happens, when a woman feels gross and sad and embarrassed after a sexual encounter, even when it was fully consensual, they have no moral language to even understand or talk about how they feel except through consent.

00:05:02.940 You know, they can't say that sex outside of marriage is bad or that degrading group sex is bad or that drunkenness and intoxication are bad.

00:05:12.880 And that's why they feel bad.

00:05:14.980 They can't say any of that stuff on the left because on the left you're supposed to celebrate all of that.

00:05:21.700 The only moral framework they have, the only line that can be crossed on the leftist mindset revolves around consent.

00:05:30.760 And therefore, any sex that makes a woman feel bad after the fact must have been ipso facto non-consensual.

00:05:38.980 The concept of sex that was wrong yet consensual is foreign to a woman like this.

00:05:45.220 She has been told and has believed that wrong yet consensual is a category that cannot exist.

00:05:53.720 Now, this is not meant to be an excuse for the accuser.

00:05:57.660 It's not an excuse, but an explanation about the worldview that feeds into these kinds

00:06:04.140 of false rape allegations, and we've seen this many times.

00:06:07.640 If you're a rational person with a more robust and coherent moral framework, then it can

00:06:14.320 be kind of difficult to wrap your mind around this.

00:06:16.920 But the fact is that a lot of people in this country today, especially those on the left

00:06:21.120 politically, truly believe that the only moral rule that obtains in any situation, not just

00:06:29.180 sexual, is consent. The only thing that matters morally, they think, ever, is whether everybody

00:06:37.000 involved in a particular act chose to be involved. Now, in reality, however, consent is merely the

00:06:44.140 first step, right? It's the first box to check on your way to making sure that what you're doing

00:06:52.460 is moral. Obviously, sex must be consensual, but it also must respect the dignity and humanity

00:06:59.000 of the other person involved and of yourself. So what happened at Cornell was undignified,

00:07:06.920 unhuman, animalistic. It's not even human behavior. I have eight people in a room doing

00:07:14.360 this. This is not human. This is animalistic. It's savage. But it was consensual. It checked

00:07:23.180 that box, but it didn't check the second box or any of the other boxes beyond that.

00:07:28.500 But the left, again, has no moral language to describe bad, gross, undignified, consensual sex.

00:07:38.340 And they have no way in their moral philosophy, such as it is, to account for the possibility that a person, especially a woman, might feel really bad about something she actively chose to do.

00:07:50.180 So if she feels bad, it must have been non-consensual.

00:07:54.660 That is the way they frame it.

00:07:57.580 That's the way they see it.

00:07:59.460 And this is how millions of women, particularly on the left, have been told to think about sex.

00:08:04.320 They've heard this message from the media, from the schools, from university administrators, and in many cases from their own parents.

00:08:12.600 It's the same perspective that's shared by Democrat politicians at all levels of government, up to and including the governor of New York, Kathy Hochul, and her staff.

00:08:20.200 All of these people know that the Cornell incident was lurid and repulsive and that everybody involved, the men and women,

00:08:27.140 the woman, bear culpability for it. But if they were to condemn the debauchery,

00:08:33.160 they'd be undoing generations of work by feminists and sexual revolutionaries who have decided that,

00:08:38.980 who have dedicated their lives and a lot of political capital to the hedonistic maxim that

00:08:44.720 sex is merely one more way for people to enjoy themselves without the need for any deeper purpose

00:08:49.880 or commitment or respect or anything like that. They can't bring themselves to do that under

00:08:57.000 any circumstances. So instead, we're treated to this charade on a national scale, to this absurd

00:09:02.220 idea that a woman can retroactively revoke her consent to sexual activity to avoid confronting

00:09:08.520 her shame about what she chose to do. The charade reached the point of absurdity a couple of days

00:09:15.380 ago. Well, it's been absurd this whole time, but it reached a fever pitch, I suppose, when

00:09:18.840 Kathy Ockel appointed a special prosecutor to investigate the case.

00:09:23.720 Even though, again, the alleged victim has admitted in writing that no crime occurred, has actually said that explicitly in writing, nobody committed a crime.

00:09:37.000 But this is what Hochul did, and the special prosecutor that has been appointed is none other than Letitia James, who's best known for engineering a fake civil case against Donald Trump, which ultimately fell apart.

00:09:48.800 She prejudged that case. She actually ran for office on a pledge to investigate and convict Donald Trump.

00:09:55.000 And she's done exactly the same thing here.

00:09:57.580 So this was a video posted by Letitia James just one day before she was appointed as a special prosecutor.

00:10:03.780 Listen. So let me just say my heart goes out to the victim, the survivor.

00:10:11.600 And I stand with her and all individuals who unfortunately have been the victims of sexual assault.

00:10:18.260 And my job is to ensure that the rights of students and that the rights of survivors and that all individuals on campuses all throughout the state of New York are safe.

00:10:28.320 And that Cornell University and other universities, SUNY universities, CUNY universities, private universities, all have protocols in place, that they are in compliance with Title IX, and that they ensure that all of the students are safe on their campus.

00:10:43.920 In addition to that, the Tompkins County District Attorney has reopened this case.

00:10:47.360 He's presenting this case to the grand jury. And there have been a lot of comments with respect to his handling of the case.

00:10:56.120 And we look forward to the outcome and to ensure that, in fact, justice is served and there's accountability for the survivor.

00:11:04.400 So, again, the word we keep coming back to is farcical. That's that's what all of this is.

00:11:11.200 no credible person can claim that this has any credibility at this point. The whole point of a

00:11:18.900 special prosecutor is supposed to be to avoid conflicts of interest, to avoid bias. That's

00:11:26.880 the whole reason you bring in a special prosecutor. And here you have the special prosecutor on camera

00:11:32.220 before anything's been investigated, already declaring what the results of the investigation

00:11:37.400 will be. In a sane society, this wouldn't just simply disqualify Letitia James from serving as

00:11:44.480 a special prosecutor in this case. This would lead to her impeachment and removal as Attorney

00:11:49.600 General of New York. It would also lead to lawsuits that would bankrupt her for life. I mean, that's

00:11:54.520 what she deserves. She's repeatedly talking about a victim and a survivor and outright stating

00:12:00.740 that this woman was the victim of a sexual assault, all of which contradicts what the alleged victim

00:12:06.440 herself has stated, as well as all the available evidence. If anything, by the standards of consent

00:12:13.280 set by the left anyway, some of these men are the victims. Several of them never even touched this

00:12:18.660 woman, and at least two of them, based on the woman's statement, were more intoxicated than she

00:12:23.660 was. So this would be inexcusable coming from a random online podcaster, but this is coming from

00:12:29.720 the attorney general, who under the law isn't supposed to prosecute any cases where she has an

00:12:35.060 obvious bias. And in this case, she's been tapped as a special prosecutor, which is a position that

00:12:41.720 by definition requires, again, that she doesn't have any conflict of interest, that she doesn't

00:12:46.200 have a bias. That's the whole point of that position. But she clearly has one. And when she

00:12:53.040 and the governor were asked about this, neither one of them had a coherent reply. James didn't

00:12:58.200 even bother to attempt to answer the question. Watch. Attorney General, on your Facebook page

00:13:04.780 three days ago, you wrote, what this young woman has been forced to endure is horrific and

00:13:08.840 unacceptable. I'm holding her in my heart and in my prayers to her and to all survivors. You're

00:13:13.440 not alone. We stand with you. Why did you affirm her allegations as fact without doing your own

00:13:19.920 fact-finding investigation into the governor? Why did you appoint an official who made a public

00:13:25.140 statements affirming those allegations as fact, as someone who's supposed to be doing an investigation.

00:13:31.420 I will answer that. I have every confidence in our attorney general to do what she has always done.

00:13:37.720 Look at the facts, examine the record and draw the proper conclusions. That's exactly what's

00:13:42.200 going to happen in this case. I will not comment on a Facebook post.

00:13:49.780 So no answer there. And we all know what the conclusion of this investigation will be.

00:13:53.820 Um, not only are they going to prosecute the seven, but it's going to be full, uh, Derek

00:14:01.300 Chauvin, you know, they're going to find people that weren't even involved that weren't even

00:14:04.840 there and they're going to prosecute them too.

00:14:07.140 I mean, it's, it's not just going to be, it's not a question of whether all seven of the

00:14:11.400 quote unquote Cornell seven are prosecuted.

00:14:14.040 It's how many additional young men are they going to pull into this in some cases who

00:14:20.160 had nothing to do with it whatsoever, because that will happen.

00:14:23.820 You know, you hear people like Barack Obama say, as he said recently, that if women ran the world, everything would be peaceful and run smoothly.

00:14:33.540 And then you look at what actually happens when you have women like this running things and, you know, and well, here's what it looks like.

00:14:40.620 their top priority as the highest ranking officials in New York is to launch a criminal

00:14:45.960 investigation into a two-year-old booty call at a frat house where nobody was killed or suffered

00:14:52.880 any significant physical injuries, which involved no criminal activity, even according to the

00:14:58.640 written statements of the alleged victim at the time, and which didn't even bother her

00:15:04.800 enough to get her to withdraw from the Halloween party. She had to be disinvited

00:15:12.200 from a Halloween party. A Halloween party she desperately wanted to attend at the very same

00:15:16.560 place where she later claimed she was raped. And with the very same people who she now says raped

00:15:21.580 her. You get the sense that at some level, these women realize they have no case. That's why the

00:15:27.260 governor is trying to change the law. So here's what she posted. Quote, choosing to have a drink

00:15:33.620 is not consent and it's never a license for sexual assault. New York law should reflect that.

00:15:38.280 I support closing the voluntary intoxication loophole and will work with the legislature to

00:15:44.080 get it done. So apparently she thinks there's a loophole in the law where if you have a drink

00:15:50.720 of alcohol, you're consenting to get sexually assaulted. But rest assured, I looked this up

00:15:56.580 and just, I mean, common sense tells you that's not the case, but looked it up anyway, just to

00:16:01.020 make sure. And there is, in fact, no such loophole. This is very much like when Biden

00:16:07.760 passed a law, the Democrats passed a law, making it a crime, making lynching a crime.

00:16:15.200 We've got to close the lynching loophole. Well, there's no loophole. It was already a crime 50

00:16:20.480 times over. And this is already a crime to actually rape someone, man or woman, who is

00:16:27.700 intoxicated or is not intoxicated is against the law. It's already a crime. Rape is already a crime

00:16:34.040 in New York. Under the current law in New York, choosing to have a drink is not, in fact, consent

00:16:40.420 in and of itself, obviously. However, it is true that if you have a couple of drinks,

00:16:46.140 then as long as you're not unconscious or disabled in some way, you're still allowed to

00:16:52.080 legally consent to sexual activity. And that makes sense, because what's the other option here?

00:16:59.840 What she's trying to do is change the law so that, I guess, if you have a few drinks,

00:17:03.700 then for all intents and purposes, you can't consent to anything. Now, overnight, of course,

00:17:09.680 this would classify about, what, like 90% of people living in New York as rapists right away.

00:17:15.860 I mean, if you've ever had any sexual encounter with anyone who had a few drinks, even if you

00:17:23.340 also had a few drinks, and even if nobody was inebriated, well, then you're a rapist in New

00:17:27.940 York. If that's how they changed the law, it would also have a host of other consequences

00:17:34.260 that these women obviously haven't thought through because the process of thinking through

00:17:37.700 anything requires a level of self-awareness and IQ that exceeds the grasp of Kathy Hochul and her

00:17:43.800 henchwoman. According to Hochul's proposal, the moment you're voluntarily intoxicated,

00:17:48.700 you simply can't be held responsible for your actions. So, okay, if somebody gets drunk and

00:17:55.860 then decides to get behind the wheel of a car, how can we hold them responsible for DUI?

00:18:01.680 If they run over a family of five, I mean, how can you charge them with any crime? After all,

00:18:05.960 once you're voluntarily intoxicated, you bear no responsibility for anything,

00:18:09.540 according to Kathy Hochul. As I've brought up several times now,

00:18:11.700 Now, under the current law, in like every state in the union, actually, not only are you held responsible if you get into an accident while you're drunk, you're held more responsible.

00:18:22.880 The law says, and as it should, well, no, I mean, if you kill someone in your car, you're already in trouble.

00:18:28.820 But if you got drunk ahead of time, that just makes you even more, you behaved even more irresponsibly.

00:18:34.580 That's just another layer of negligence on your side.

00:18:38.540 And so you're going to be in even more trouble.

00:18:41.700 So in that way, we ascribe even greater volition to the drunk person in some ways when it comes to a car accident.

00:18:53.480 Well, how does that work with this change to the law they want to make?

00:18:56.340 Well, who knows? They haven't thought about it.

00:18:58.860 It's all totally incoherent, but it tracks with how women are being told to think about sexual assault.

00:19:04.160 Let's take a look at this extraordinary report from ABC News, for example.

00:19:06.640 This is designed to shock us into thinking that sexual assault is an epidemic on campuses, but it manages to highlight another problem entirely, kind of the opposite problem, if anything.

00:19:19.400 Quote, a state-mandated survey of undergraduate students at Cornell revealed that more than one-third of undergraduate women said they experienced sexual assault during their time at the Ivy League University.

00:19:29.440 According to the school's 2025 survey of sexual assault and related misconduct, 35% of the undergraduate women at the Ithaca, New York, school report experiencing non-consensual sexual contact involving force or incapacitation since entering Cornell.

00:19:45.740 In 50% of cases, respondents reported being conscious but incapacitated by alcohol or drugs during all or part of the incident, according to the report, with 90% saying they were passed out or unconscious for some or all of the time.

00:19:58.460 well all this report demonstrates if anything is that the crisis of fake sexual assault claims

00:20:04.260 is far worse than we imagined okay unless you're willing to believe the 35 figure which you're

00:20:13.220 retarded if you are i mean they're saying that 35 of undergraduate women at cornell have been

00:20:18.120 sexually assaulted 35 just for comparison according to a study of refugees at a camp in

00:20:23.860 Mogadishu, 19% of women had experienced gender-based violence, quote-unquote, in the

00:20:29.740 preceding 12 months. That includes all forms of violence, not just sexual violence. I think

00:20:35.680 this fact puts the Cornell claim maybe into even sharper relief. During the decade-long

00:20:41.280 civil war in Sierra Leone, 13% of households reported sexual violence and 9% of individual

00:20:48.800 women. So think about that for a moment. We're supposed to believe that at an Ivy League campus

00:20:55.400 in the United States of America, women are being sexually assaulted at far higher rates than women

00:21:01.700 in third world refugee camps. We're supposed to believe they're being assaulted at triple the

00:21:06.840 rate of women in war-torn African hellholes. According to this, if you're a woman, you're

00:21:13.500 more likely to be raped on an Ivy League college campus than if you are airdropped into the middle

00:21:20.580 of an African civil war for 10 years. Does any thinking person believe that? Of course not.

00:21:31.960 So I decided to look into this survey because it gets at the root of the problem, which is that

00:21:35.480 women are being trained to recast unpleasant sexual experiences as assault, which is a pretty

00:21:43.600 big problem. And the first thing I noticed, which the media doesn't tell you, is that this survey

00:21:48.180 had a response rate of 15%. Quote, a total of 926 students participated in the 2025 survey,

00:21:54.360 resulting in an overall response rate of 15%. Graduate and professional women had the highest

00:22:00.200 participation rate at approximately 19%, while undergraduate students responded at a lower rate

00:22:04.600 of around 13%. So already this debunks the ABC report and all of the media reporting on this

00:22:11.020 survey. If only 15% of undergraduates reply to your survey and 35% of the respondents say that

00:22:17.240 they were sexually assaulted, that obviously does not mean that 35% of undergraduates say they were

00:22:23.100 assaulted. The people who are going to respond to a survey like this are far more likely to have a

00:22:27.680 complaint and the sample size therefore is not statistically useful. It's a pretty big issue and

00:22:33.500 the media is pretending not to understand it. The survey itself states that these issues, quote,

00:22:38.260 limit confidence in the accuracy of these estimates. You think? But we're supposed to

00:22:43.460 take it seriously with these absurd headlines. And when you look closer, you realize that the

00:22:48.700 35% number is fake too. Specifically, the survey notes that, quote, this is the first administration

00:22:54.460 of the survey where respondents were asked specifically about their experience with

00:22:57.840 unwanted choking or strangulation. The survey asked separately about incidents involving four

00:23:02.100 different tactics, the use or threatened use of physical force, incapacitation due to drugs or

00:23:06.520 alcohol, the use of coercion, i.e. threats or non-physical harm, of promises of rewards,

00:23:12.160 or promises of rewards, and the absence of affirmative consent, i.e. contact that occurred

00:23:16.920 without the student's knowing, voluntary, and ongoing agreements. So to be clear about this,

00:23:23.920 that means that they're including in their definition of sexual assault some stuff that

00:23:28.980 obviously would be sexual assault and other stuff that wouldn't be. And all of this is self-reported

00:23:35.080 data. And so, you know, what you're taking from this is that this number of women made this claim

00:23:42.620 on a survey and it's totally up to them. It's totally up to them how they define retroactively

00:23:50.700 sexual assault. But the whole issue we're having here is that the definition is wildly ridiculous

00:23:56.800 at this point. And to be clear about this, according to the ridiculous concept of affirmative

00:24:03.040 consent, as it's preached on college campuses, if someone in a sexual encounter, it's supposed

00:24:11.480 to be someone, but really this in practice only applies to the woman, doesn't verbally and

00:24:16.660 affirmatively consent to each specific act within one sexual encounter, even an encounter that

00:24:25.740 has already been consented to,

00:24:28.380 then potentially that can become rape after the fact.

00:24:32.880 This is how they inflate the sexual assault statistics

00:24:35.880 to absurd proportions.

00:24:37.440 Along with reference to incapacitation to drugs or alcohol,

00:24:41.480 in context, they're not talking about women

00:24:43.580 who are so incapacitated that they can't consent.

00:24:46.360 They're talking about a very large category of women

00:24:48.260 who voluntarily get drunk and high, and or high,

00:24:53.540 and then later regret their actions.

00:24:56.320 Listen up. There are enough people listening to the show right now that if they don't vote,

00:25:01.900 it could swing key states in the 2026 election to the Democrats. And everybody listening knows

00:25:07.580 every single ultra far left Democratic Socialists will be showing up to vote this fall. Democrats

00:25:12.700 are fired up and we can't let them win because if we lose, they'll undo everything our movement

00:25:17.680 has fought for. I need you to vote early so that you can bank your vote and fight back against the

00:25:22.660 left's turnout machine. If you live in the critical Senate battleground states of Maine or Ohio,

00:25:28.440 early voting is already underway starting this week. Go to gopvotes.org right now and find out

00:25:34.440 when you can vote. Making your voice heard is easier than ever. Get election reminders, look up

00:25:38.840 your polling location, and pick a date to vote early. Go to gopvotes.org today, paid for by SLF

00:25:45.020 PAC, not authorized by any candidate or candidates committee. People will spend six months researching

00:25:51.220 which television to buy, compare 47 different models, read 900 reviews, and save themselves

00:25:57.720 30 bucks. So meanwhile, they've been paying the same wireless company too much money every single

00:26:02.920 month for 12 years. Perhaps we're allocating our research time incorrectly, but I have a pure talk

00:26:08.940 line. The reason I keep telling you about them is pretty simple. The coverage is phenomenal. I use

00:26:14.460 the unlimited data constantly, and their unlimited high-speed data is just $34.99 a month. So it

00:26:19.980 turns out you don't actually have to choose. And don't just take my word for it. In a recent

00:26:24.460 industry survey of more than 120,000 wireless customers, Pure Talk was the only wireless

00:26:29.500 company to receive five out of five stars in every category, coverage, support, value, and data. At

00:26:35.700 some point, paying more for worse service stops being unfortunate and starts becoming a decision

00:26:41.820 that you're making voluntarily. So stop doing that. Go to puretalk.com slash Walsh and save

00:26:47.580 50% off your first month. That's puretalk.com slash Walsh. The survey doesn't even define,

00:26:54.560 by the way, incapacitation. It's just sort of like if you feel afterwards that you were

00:26:58.300 incapacitated, even if at the time you voluntarily got drunk, you gave verbal consent, just like in

00:27:04.220 the Cornell case, all that stuff, check all those boxes. Later on, a week later, a year later,

00:27:09.860 two years later, if you decide looking back on it that, you know what, I feel like I was

00:27:13.180 incapacitated, and even if the other person involved or people were also quote-unquote

00:27:19.260 incapacitated, still you can qualify that as sexual assault, and that's what the survey reflects.

00:27:25.160 There's another contributing factor here, which is that in general, women have much lower alcohol

00:27:28.920 tolerance than men, and when you combine alcohol with the SSRIs that millions of women are taking,

00:27:34.520 the effect is magnified even further. According to a study out of England, pretty much every woman

00:27:39.420 who says that she was drugged was actually drunk voluntarily. They looked at 1,014 cases of claimed

00:27:48.420 drug-facilitated sexual assault, and they found that only 21 cases, or 2%, involved a sedative

00:27:56.180 or disinhibiting drug that the woman didn't admit to taking. And that includes three cases where

00:28:02.200 the woman were allegedly given ecstasy without their knowledge. That obviously counts as being

00:28:06.360 drugged. But in general, according to statistics, when women claim that they were drugged, often

00:28:12.120 they took the drugs themselves. We're seeing this right now in the Cornell case. We're hearing

00:28:17.000 claims. AOC said this. We played the clip last week. She said the woman was drugged.

00:28:26.660 Yet by the woman's own testimony, she took the drugs herself because she wanted to.

00:28:32.980 So that's what it means to be drugged now.

00:28:36.260 Even that phrase now has no meaning.

00:28:39.740 That's an important point because the New York Times reporting on the Cornell accuser's behavior in the days following this alleged assault in the frat house makes it very clear that she falls into this category of someone who voluntarily drugged themselves.

00:28:53.480 Quote, in October 2024, about a week after the fraternity party at Cornell University, the sophomore who would come to be known as Jane Doe was milling around an online forum about Greek life when she encountered a post that stopped her cold.

00:29:08.360 Our Chi-Fi brothers, Crips or Bloods, because I hear that they've been doing hell gangbanging, someone had written.

00:29:15.960 They do drugs and gang rape to sophomore, another user wrote.

00:29:19.720 Report them.

00:29:20.880 Since the evening that began on October 19th, 2024, Jane Doe had recounted the night's events

00:29:25.680 to her roommates without identifying herself as a rape victim. She'd exchanged friendly text

00:29:29.800 messages with men. She would later accuse of assault. She'd heard uncharitable appraisals

00:29:33.360 of herself from undergraduate gossip. Then she read the words. That's the first time I'd ever

00:29:37.860 heard the narrative change that I wasn't a whore and that I was assaulted, Jane Doe told investigators.

00:29:45.360 Okay, so first of all, reading this, it sounds a lot like

00:29:47.840 maybe this woman was the one leaving anonymous messages on the forum. But even if she's not,

00:29:54.100 that paragraph is still extremely revealing and troubling. She's telling investigators that until

00:29:59.700 she saw someone else say that she was assaulted, she did not think that she was assaulted.

00:30:07.940 So someone had to come along a week after the incident in her version of events and tell her

00:30:15.520 What happened to her?

00:30:16.600 This is someone who wasn't there.

00:30:19.980 Until that point, in every conversation she had, she affirmed that she was not assaulted.

00:30:24.780 Quote, on October 21st, Jane Doe went to her big sister, a woman designated as a mentor

00:30:29.280 at Cornell's Tri-Delta sorority, and told her that there were rumors circulating that

00:30:36.960 she was a slut.

00:30:37.780 The big sister, a junior at Cornell, told investigators that Jane Doe added with a laugh

00:30:41.680 that, unfortunately, they are true.

00:30:45.220 The same day, she also wrote to one of her alleged attackers in a text message saying, quote,

00:30:49.500 at the end of the day, none of the sexual stuff was illegal.

00:30:53.140 And honestly, I really liked being with you and the other guy.

00:30:58.940 So this was her position, which she established in writing repeatedly two days after the alleged attack.

00:31:04.320 But things began to change a couple of days later as word began to spread.

00:31:09.040 Quote, on October 23rd, Jane Doe texted Mr. Ingalls, bro, she wrote, everyone knows.

00:31:14.380 She said the episode was ruining my life temporarily

00:31:16.700 and that her reputation has been destroyed.

00:31:19.460 She said all she could do was sleep and cry all day.

00:31:22.720 In the meantime, Jane Doe had delivered strict instructions to one of her roommates.

00:31:26.180 If anyone asks about this, she said, according to roommate's testimony,

00:31:28.880 say it didn't happen.

00:31:29.960 The roommate was plainly concerned.

00:31:31.860 Initially, she said Jane Doe was kind of recounting it

00:31:34.180 as this sort of crazy thing that she had done.

00:31:39.160 That she had done.

00:31:40.600 As you look through these documents, there are indeed many indications that members of the frat and everyone else on campus was mocking this woman.

00:31:49.820 They were shaming her for her behavior, which will naturally happen when you behave in a way that's disgusting, just as the men behaved in a disgusting way.

00:31:59.660 They all did.

00:32:01.260 But the turning point came when the fraternity decided, as a matter of official policy, to stop associating with her.

00:32:06.760 quote the fraternity was preparing for a halloween party and jane doe was eager to attend

00:32:13.140 text messages included in the investigation show mr ingalls assuring jane doe that he and the other

00:32:18.720 fraternity members wanted her to be there uh chi-fi is your house and you are welcome here he

00:32:25.220 wrote relaying the views of the attorney's president who was not among those accused of

00:32:29.700 sexual assault thank you i really appreciate that uh jane doe responded i'll bring my cigs tomorrow

00:32:36.320 with a little heart symbol.

00:32:39.180 But then Jane Doe received a phone call

00:32:40.840 from the fraternity's president.

00:32:41.940 According to the text messages,

00:32:43.060 she was disinvited from the party.

00:32:44.760 It was for her own good, he said.

00:32:46.640 Jane Doe sent a biting text to Mr. Ingalls.

00:32:49.500 I knew this was going to happen.

00:32:50.420 She wrote, the woman will always get

00:32:52.440 the short end of the stick.

00:32:53.660 Y'all aren't my friends.

00:32:55.000 Y'all are covering your asses.

00:32:56.560 By November 3rd, Jane Doe appears to have concluded

00:32:59.120 that she was assaulted at the October party.

00:33:00.740 She sent a text to Mr. Newell.

00:33:03.040 Let's be clear that 90% of what happened that night

00:33:04.720 was not consensual.

00:33:05.740 I was given more key than I can remember, she said, using a shorthand for ketamine.

00:33:11.120 And I know that I told you I felt uncomfortable and I didn't know anyone in the room.

00:33:14.360 Four days later, on November 7th, according to the documents, Jane Doe went to an emergency room in Ithaca and requested a rape kit.

00:33:22.060 Yes, again, she concluded that she was assaulted only after she was disinvited from a Halloween party

00:33:28.780 that she desperately wanted to attend at a place where she supposedly was raped with people who had assaulted her, supposedly.

00:33:35.740 that was her aha moment. Once she realized that the men had used her and didn't actually care

00:33:42.040 about her, on top of the fact that everyone on campus knew she was a degenerate, she came to

00:33:46.740 see the supposed truth about what actually happened. She told the campus police that she

00:33:50.340 was assaulted. She gave a big statement to campus police, complete with 20 handwritten edits, which

00:33:55.040 upon a thorough review of the facts did not actually allege a crime. And two years later,

00:34:00.140 she files a lawsuit. Now, if you read between the lines here, it's possible that the woman's

00:34:05.220 sorority was so embarrassed by her behavior that they contacted the fraternity and told them to

00:34:09.440 cut her off to avoid any future incidents and embarrassment. That's speculation, but it makes

00:34:14.360 sense considering the campus politics here. This woman was becoming a campus-wide embarrassment

00:34:18.900 for everyone associated with her, and the reputation of her sorority was taking a hit.

00:34:24.280 Her reputation was destroyed, she says. So in a move that's very common in left-wing circles,

00:34:28.740 she decided that she was actually a victim, and it would seem to save face. At the same time,

00:34:35.340 based on some of the texts from the members of the fraternity, this woman was indeed treated

00:34:39.140 like garbage, and they took full advantage of her willingness to participate in something like this.

00:34:44.560 And as you read their texts, it becomes clear why the school expelled the man who she came to see,

00:34:50.180 as well as one of the men who texted everyone else in the group chat. Watch.

00:34:55.560 Tonight, images from inside the room at the Chi-Fi Fraternity House

00:34:59.480 where a former Cornell University student alleges she was gang-raped two years ago.

00:35:03.920 The room strewn with garbage, discarded furniture, and there on the windowsill,

00:35:07.920 a poster of a sorority class and a fentanyl test strip.

00:35:11.340 The video, obtained by ABC News, was taken after Cornell suspended the frat.

00:35:16.120 Campus police showed up and knocked at the door

00:35:19.900 three days after an officer logged that a female undergraduate student

00:35:23.720 reported that she was recently raped by eight to ten men at the Chi-Fi fraternity house, and this

00:35:29.020 campus alert went out to students about a report of a sexual assault. Tonight, ABC News obtained

00:35:34.540 more of the vulgar Snapchat messages shared among more than 50 fraternity members during the alleged

00:35:39.780 assault. The friend Jane Doe went to see that night, sent the group a photo that appears to

00:35:45.080 show her in the bedroom. One brother then asking, shop still open? Another saying, LFG. Then Jane

00:35:52.360 Doe's friend invited all of them to the room. Boys, come whip it out. Three weeks later,

00:35:57.940 Jane Doe recorded her phone call of that same friend, asking him, do you remember how any of

00:36:02.940 these guys walked in? He made no mention of his crude invitation on the group chat, instead

00:36:07.600 explaining it this way. The door was just unlocked. The party was sort of like crowded.

00:36:12.120 There was nowhere else to go. Jane Doe telling him, if I wanted to take this somewhere, what

00:36:16.900 y'all did would be classified as gang rape, claiming the alleged attack left her body

00:36:21.600 physically damaged. In phone calls and messages reviewed by ABC News, other alleged attackers

00:36:27.540 telling Jane Doe, I'm so sorry, I feel so bad for you, dude. Another saying, I just wanted to

00:36:32.980 apologize for how things went down the other night. As the weeks went by, Jane Doe became

00:36:37.940 more convinced about what happened, texting, let's be clear that 90% of what happened that night was

00:36:43.880 not consensual. All I remember after that was you giving me ketamine. She said it made her feel like

00:36:49.920 a sex doll slash worker so notice how they include the text where the guy says i'm sorry for how

00:36:57.920 things went down but they omit her response uh which i'll read one more time and her response

00:37:03.420 was quote at the end of the day none of the sexual stuff was illegal and honestly i really liked

00:37:08.940 being with you and matt i guess abc didn't find her response relevant for the report which they

00:37:15.160 broadcast to millions of people. Now, regardless, these texts obviously reveal very low moral

00:37:20.440 character, but they don't prove or even suggest that this woman didn't consent to everything that

00:37:26.600 happened. They don't prove or even suggest that she was forced to be in that room, forced to

00:37:33.200 continue to have sexual encounters with whoever came in,

00:37:38.060 or that she was threatened or coerced in any way.

00:37:43.560 And she's not even accusing them of that,

00:37:45.760 which is why charges weren't filed the first time.

00:37:52.120 And that's the fact.

00:37:53.500 And they don't contradict the narrative events

00:37:55.760 that the men provided to the police.

00:37:57.180 Indeed, there's no principled reason whatsoever

00:37:59.560 for the left to embrace the woman's narrative

00:38:01.900 while disregarding the version of events

00:38:04.060 provided by members of the fraternity.

00:38:06.140 This is also from the Times, quote,

00:38:07.620 When asked about his involvement with Jane Doe, Mr. Lopez said that she initiated their sexual contact and did not ask for his consent, a statement flatly at odds with her account of the night.

00:38:16.900 Mr. Lopez left around 2 a.m., he said, after he said he became uncomfortable and went with three friends to McDonald's.

00:38:23.380 He said he didn't tell them about what had transpired, in part because he was admittedly a bit embarrassed about what happened, according to the interview records.

00:38:30.760 Mr. Lee also said that Jane Doe initiated sexual activity without asking.

00:38:34.420 He said he snorted a line of ketamine off her body and she tried to initiate sex.

00:38:39.040 I kind of took a step back because I didn't want to engage in anything like that, like sex, Mr. Lee said.

00:38:43.980 I thought it wasn't the time for that.

00:38:45.520 But later that night, Mr. Lee said he asked for Jane Doe's consent before engaging in a threesome with her.

00:38:50.680 He recalled telling Jane Doe that if you're uncomfortable with any of this or you don't want to do this, that's perfectly fine.

00:38:55.740 We can call it a night.

00:38:57.580 He said Jane Doe replied, we're all consenting adults here.

00:39:01.280 So this is, by the left's definition, affirmative consent. According to the left, they did

00:39:08.940 everything right. Because remember, on the left, you can't say there's anything inherently

00:39:13.080 immoral about this kind of sexual activity. There is, even if it's consensual, but if you're on the

00:39:19.620 left, you can't say that. So on the left, they did everything right. They repeatedly asked her

00:39:25.780 for verbal consent, and then after the fact, in writing, she confirmed what they say she said at

00:39:32.700 the time, which is that nothing illegal had occurred. So they crossed all the T's and dotted

00:39:37.200 all the I's, and yet here we are. We're supposed to ignore all the evidence and all the contemporaneous

00:39:41.680 statements from both the men and their accuser. We're supposed to focus entirely on the accusations

00:39:46.100 she made weeks after the fact. It's also remarkable that of the seven men named in this woman's

00:39:52.700 lawsuit, it appears that several of them never even made any physical contact with her at all.

00:39:56.880 Two of them apparently went to the room when they saw the group text advertising free access to the

00:40:02.820 woman, but they did so according to these statements, simply to ensure that everything

00:40:06.120 was consensual. Quote, in her interview with the police, Jane Doe said that Mr. Kretschmar and

00:40:11.840 Mr. Norris were more like voyeurs than anything the record show. Diego Sarabia said he entered

00:40:17.480 the room after 2.30 a.m. and was shocked by the scene before him. Several frat brothers were there

00:40:22.260 and one was standing behind Jane Doe, although Mr. Sarabia refused to say whether the person was

00:40:27.400 naked or dressed. I was immensely concerned since I've never seen anything like this in my four

00:40:31.060 years at the house, he said, according to the records. But he said his concerns were laid when

00:40:34.800 all the people in the room told him to come in. I remember the girl in specific saying something

00:40:38.600 along the lines of, this was normal in the medieval times, he said. Yes, according to the

00:40:44.720 statement, she said this was normal in the medieval times. This is the cutting edge of

00:40:49.020 progressive thinking at Ivy League universities, apparently. The new progressive pitch is to take

00:40:52.760 us back to medieval times, which actually, you know, okay, as long as we bring back medieval

00:40:59.780 punishments, you know what they do if you committed perjury? Well, they make sure you never tell

00:41:06.140 another lie again. I'll leave it to your imagination as to how they would achieve that.

00:41:11.900 Never mind that, you know, alcohol-fueled sex orgies with seven men and one woman were not,

00:41:16.780 in fact, normal and medieval times. This Ivy League student has clearly received her education

00:41:24.120 on medieval culture from like Game of Thrones or something. I mean, that's not even a joke.

00:41:29.520 That's literally where she got that idea from, because that's not true. Fall leaves have one of

00:41:35.620 the best marketing campaigns in nature. When they're attached to trees, people drive for hours

00:41:40.860 to look at them and take pictures. The moment those same leaves land in your gutter, though,

00:41:45.000 they become wet garbage, threatening your foundation. Same leaf, dramatically worse

00:41:49.700 location. This is where seasonal charm starts to turn into home maintenance. Clog gutters can

00:41:55.560 send rainwater spilling over the sides onto your landscaping and around your foundation.

00:42:00.460 Waiting for a storm to expose the problem is a very expensive way to remember that your gutters

00:42:04.600 exist. Leaf filter helps protect your home before that happens. Their local pros inspect and clean

00:42:10.560 out your gutters, then repair or replace them if necessary before installing LeafFilter.

00:42:15.560 Its surgical-grade stainless steel micro-mesh keeps common debris out while directing water

00:42:21.500 away from your foundation where it belongs. Every installation comes with a no-claw guarantee

00:42:26.020 and a lifetime transferable warranty. So enjoy the leaves while they're on the trees. Once they

00:42:31.460 reach your roof, the admiration period is over. Protect your home before issues arise with LeafFilter,

00:42:37.080 America's number one rated gutter protection system.

00:42:39.700 Schedule an inspection for free by visiting leaffilter.com slash Walsh to secure an estimate locked in for a full year.

00:42:46.980 Take advantage of saving up to 35% off when going to leaffilter.com slash Walsh.

00:42:53.360 Requires minimum purchase. Certain restrictions apply.

00:42:55.820 Contact representative regarding warranty and promotional details.

00:43:00.020 Are you noticing your car insurance rate creep up even without tickets or claims?

00:43:03.600 You're not alone.

00:43:05.340 That's why there's Jerry, your proactive insurance assistant.

00:43:08.880 Jerry handles the legwork by comparing quotes side-by-side from over 50 top insurers,

00:43:12.780 so you can confidently hit buy.

00:43:14.820 No spam calls, no hidden fees.

00:43:17.400 Jerry even tracks rates and alerts you when it's best to shop.

00:43:20.700 Drivers who save with Jerry can save over $1,300 a year.

00:43:23.680 Don't settle for higher rates.

00:43:25.140 Download the Jerry app or visit jerry.ai slash wire today.

00:43:29.520 And to be clear, she's named these men in the lawsuit,

00:43:32.080 The two guys had just walked in after receiving that text and were more like voyeurs than anything, according to her.

00:43:37.100 To all appearances, they wanted to make sure that everything was okay and that everyone was consenting.

00:43:41.740 And for that, the identities of these men have been plastered all over the internet.

00:43:46.220 Here's a video on TikTok with more than 4 million views where someone calls for them to be executed.

00:43:51.520 Put all seven of them to death.

00:43:54.380 Publicly.

00:43:55.460 I'm not kidding.

00:43:56.120 The Cornell Seven?

00:43:57.400 No, I can't say.

00:43:58.480 How about you explaining to me why you should live?

00:44:00.660 why you should continue to be on the earth seven cornell inhuman scum seven cornell men

00:44:06.740 drugged and raped a woman for seven hours advertising it to an entire group chat

00:44:11.920 the seven that committed the act death the entire fraternity who got the advertisement and decided

00:44:19.040 to do nothing with that information to just ignore it to just let it happen knowing knowing

00:44:23.780 that it was happening they got text messages telling them like hey come on up every single

00:44:27.960 person that got that message and did nothing prison expelled in prison the university cornell

00:44:36.060 university made those seven those seven men write a essay as punishment they received punishment for

00:44:44.200 doing that crime for drugging and raping a woman for seven hours and the punishment was writing an

00:44:51.180 essay how about they all explain to the public why they should keep their breath in their lungs

00:44:57.720 so it's obviously defamatory uh what he's saying here is not true but millions of people believe

00:45:05.300 it there's you know an obvious incentive to produce videos like this because women demand it

00:45:10.100 just like we saw with lindsey clancy karen reed and many other cases uh feminists simply don't

00:45:15.460 care about the truth at all now along the same lines someone named amy siskind is calling for

00:45:20.780 latisha james to round everybody up in the group chat 57 people and investigate every single one

00:45:27.500 of of those people and as unhinged as this is if you polled cornell's student body you know

00:45:34.120 probably close to like 100 of them would agree with this or say they do uh the campus is in a

00:45:39.060 frenzy of performative outrage right now watch i don't know jane doe but i know plenty of women

00:45:45.800 like jane doe who do feel unsafe at prathouse and have you talked to any of your girlfriends

00:45:50.820 about this issue and what are they saying they're saying the same thing they're just scared

00:45:57.460 We're all scared.

00:45:58.500 We're more mad as well at the administration.

00:46:02.720 When women report issues to cops around the world,

00:46:06.120 they are either not acted upon or they're simply ignored.

00:46:08.640 It should not be protect your daughter.

00:46:11.500 It should be educate your son.

00:46:13.340 And I will die on this hill.

00:46:14.620 I've spoken with many, many other male students here.

00:46:17.820 We are outraged.

00:46:18.640 We're pissed.

00:46:19.160 We're shocked.

00:46:20.560 And it's disgusting what happened.

00:46:22.520 And we want to call out behavior like this and say it's not okay.

00:46:26.180 It's terrifying. It's absolutely terrifying to hear that that's happening.

00:46:31.700 And then also that begs the question of, what if this happened to me?

00:46:35.500 What if this happened to my best friend?

00:46:37.380 What if this happened to someone and I didn't get my day in court and I have to go to a mass media campaign just to be heard?

00:46:47.020 Everyone deserves to know exactly what happened in 2024.

00:46:50.740 Who was responsible of relaying that information to the DA's office?

00:46:54.560 and why exactly did that case now just get reopened.

00:46:58.560 In terms of what the student government is asking for here today,

00:47:02.220 it's transparency, accountability, and reform.

00:47:05.160 It's as simple as that.

00:47:06.220 We want to know exactly what happened that night

00:47:08.160 to the best of the university's ability,

00:47:10.100 obviously complying under federal law.

00:47:14.700 We heard there, it should not be protect your daughter,

00:47:17.580 it should be educate your son.

00:47:20.200 And this is something that we hear a lot from leftists.

00:47:22.720 they come up with these dumb sayings in lieu of saying anything that actually makes sense or has

00:47:29.500 any real content to it. This is a case where a woman made the decision to get high and drunk

00:47:34.140 and walk into a frat house where she consented to sexual activity with multiple men who were

00:47:39.460 so intoxicated they were vomiting. And it's only the men who need to be educated in this scenario.

00:47:46.720 And meanwhile, we're told that the woman, you know, that women don't feel safe as if they're

00:47:51.520 being forced to attend orgies at frat houses and then to text everyone how much they can't wait to

00:47:57.580 go back to that same frat house. Apparently, according to this, a woman is thrilled to return

00:48:06.440 to her alleged rape dungeon and we're supposed to, and yet we take from that she doesn't feel

00:48:11.900 safe. It doesn't make any sense. As for the student council president and his demand for

00:48:17.180 a thorough investigation into what exactly happened, well, that's already been done.

00:48:21.860 We have contemporaneous text messages and written statements documenting the event and

00:48:26.000 its aftermath.

00:48:26.980 There's clear evidence from the accuser herself that several of the men were intoxicated even

00:48:31.320 more than she was.

00:48:32.120 In fact, just this morning, ABC News published a phone recording between the accuser and

00:48:37.320 one of the accused.

00:48:38.220 And in the conversation, three weeks after the incident, the man claims that the accuser

00:48:44.040 told the guys when she came to the party that she was sober and there are a few other important

00:48:50.920 details here listen abc news has obtained a recording of a phone call between jane doe

00:48:57.220 and the fraternity brothers she went to see the night she was allegedly attacked

00:49:01.160 the call appears to show that he was trying to convince her he meant no harm and she consented

00:49:06.860 want me to give my recollection of the entire night three weeks after her traumatic night at

00:49:12.940 the Chi-Fi house, a then Cornell student now known as Jane Doe called Matthew Ingalls, the friend

00:49:18.300 who invited her to the fraternity that night, recording the entire conversation. She told him

00:49:23.200 she spent time in the emergency room and in therapy because there's so much damage on my body

00:49:28.020 and my brain. She said, if I wanted to take this somewhere, what y'all did would be classified as

00:49:32.580 gang rape. You already knew when I came in, I was 10 shots deep. Ingalls responded with a different

00:49:38.340 recollection. You did tell me you were sober, by the way. You did. You said you hadn't been

00:49:42.840 anywhere. Jane Doe said she was 100 percent sure she told him she had been at a bar for a sorority

00:49:48.480 event. And I never lie. She asked him how they ended up in a threesome with one of his frat

00:49:53.100 brothers. So you come in, say hi. We start dancing for like three to five minutes. And then I pop

00:50:02.280 the question you say yes then i remember like we didn't know who else to bring so i go to who was

00:50:09.520 on the dance floor too and i popped the question and he's like yeah and then we go upstairs jane

00:50:16.120 doe then asking for his help to identify all of the men saying she remembered four in the bed and

00:50:21.100 more standing around the room angles seem to suggest both of their memories may not be accurate

00:50:26.040 i have wrecked my brain for this mystery you know it's possible that both of us like remember this

00:50:33.380 and it's not true jane doe pushed back saying no because i remember looking up and being like

00:50:38.680 that is too many people she then asked do you remember how any of these guys walked in the

00:50:43.400 party was sort of like crowded so people started like um filling up the balcony just because there

00:50:51.760 There's nowhere else to go.

00:50:53.060 Ingalls did not mention that during the incident, he posted to a group on Snapchat a photo of her in bed

00:50:58.500 and an invitation to his fraternity brothers, saying, boys, come whip it out.

00:51:03.140 Cornell expelled Ingalls and another student and suspended two others.

00:51:06.740 In this video obtained by ABC News, Cornell police inform one of the suspended students he is unwelcome on campus.

00:51:13.280 Take a look at that.

00:51:14.280 Per the temporary suspension, he is barred from any of the grounds owned, operated, maintained by Cornell University.

00:51:21.760 All seven fraternity brothers have denied wrongdoing.

00:51:24.380 Ingalls has not responded to Jane Doe's lawsuit, but during Cornell's internal investigation,

00:51:29.100 he said he was too intoxicated to consent and suggested Jane Doe assaulted him.

00:51:34.940 This week, Cornell will announce which outside law firm will evaluate how the university handled Jane Doe's allegations

00:51:40.880 and how it could improve its response to accusations of sexual violence on campus.

00:51:45.420 and the New York Attorney General's office is already reaching out to Jane Doe

00:51:49.260 as part of the reopened criminal investigation. George.

00:51:54.760 Well, yes, again, by the very same standards that would make her a victim in a sexual encounter

00:51:58.920 she willfully participated in, at least some of these men would also be victims

00:52:02.260 because they too were inebriated. There's just no escaping that point.

00:52:07.280 She willfully engaged in all this activity. At no point did they prevent her from leaving

00:52:11.040 or use any physical force or threats of any kind, and she doesn't even claim they did.

00:52:14.340 the whole case rests on the fact that she was really drunk at the time but so were they not

00:52:18.800 to mention she claims she was 10 shots deep so drunk that she couldn't help but have an orgy and

00:52:24.380 yet she also claims her memory of the incident is more reliable than the men who she says were more

00:52:29.220 sober than her so that doesn't make a lot of sense either and all we're left with is the confused and

00:52:34.660 confusing picture of a disgusting gross debauched sexual act willingly committed by a number of

00:52:43.940 people, a woman and several men, who all now obviously regret having played any part in it,

00:52:48.580 as they should. So it's unfortunate for all involved, but it's not rape. And none of this

00:52:55.660 is stopping any of the authority figures surrounding this case from convicting the men

00:52:58.840 right out of the gate. So this is the president of Cornell University in one of the most disgraceful

00:53:03.180 videos we've seen from a college campus, which is saying something. Watch. What happened to Jane

00:53:09.600 Doe in 2024 is deeply disturbing and will weigh heavily on our community for years to come.

00:53:18.560 My heart aches when I think of what she experienced. It raises heartbreaking and

00:53:23.840 troubling issues about sexual assault, dehumanization, and aspects of party culture,

00:53:30.960 alcohol, and drug use. It also raises questions around the investigations,

00:53:36.960 conducted after the allegations were reported.

00:53:42.600 So he's flat out accusing the men of sexual assault,

00:53:45.980 prejudging their guilt.

00:53:48.620 The university should be sued immediately,

00:53:50.600 along with the student newspaper,

00:53:51.840 which published an editorial that essentially accused

00:53:53.740 all seven men of being rapists by name.

00:53:57.100 Now, if this president actually had some integrity,

00:53:58.560 if he deserved the job he has,

00:54:00.440 he would have delivered a very different statement.

00:54:02.900 There's one important takeaway from this Cornell case

00:54:05.100 and every case like it.

00:54:06.080 one lesson, but it's the lesson that the left refuses to learn. The lesson is that feminism

00:54:12.300 and the sexual revolution have utterly and completely failed.

00:54:19.100 Actually, it's funny the accuser brought up what's allegedly normal in medieval times, because

00:54:23.360 contrary to her HBO education in European history, boozy sex orgies were not normal.

00:54:30.320 But I'll tell you what was normal, not just in medieval times, but at any point, at all points in the history of Western civilization up until about 14 seconds ago, what was normal was strict sex segregation in schools and most other institutions, clear rules governing how the sexes relate and connect and court each other, codes of chivalry, the patriarchy, quote unquote.

00:55:00.320 Every Western society for centuries had versions of these kinds of rules.

00:55:05.880 We did away with them.

00:55:08.440 And as a situation at Cornell clearly demonstrates, society is not functioning better as a result.

00:55:15.980 The education system has not improved.

00:55:19.200 Male-female relations have not improved.

00:55:23.020 Our politics have not improved.

00:55:25.160 Nothing has improved. People are not happier in general.

00:55:28.240 There's a lot of chaos and moral confusion.

00:55:35.240 And one way to avoid a situation like what we had at Cornell, which is a consensual but really horrible, disgusting incident for everybody involved, is if you weren't allowing male and female students to mix that way in the first place.

00:55:58.060 But of course, the left's not going to suggest that.

00:56:02.860 I mean, a lot of what they're saying, it's like they're coming very close to sort of accidentally saying that the whole thing should have just been illegal.

00:56:11.760 Like to have a boozy sex orgy on a college campus should just be illegal.

00:56:16.940 They're sort of accidentally making that case.

00:56:21.040 Which if they want to make that case, they should just come out and make it.

00:56:23.560 Because guess what? If they made that case, I'd agree with them.

00:56:25.780 yeah it shouldn't be legal to behave that way but they're not going to come out and say that

00:56:31.820 because that would mean that everybody involved would be criminally culpable including the woman

00:56:37.220 and they're not going to go that far they never will you know if cornell's president had delivered

00:56:43.220 a speech like that though he would have lost a job the mob would have destroyed his house someone

00:56:47.500 would probably come forward to accuse him of sexual assault they'd throw him in prison but

00:56:53.260 at least he'd have accomplished something that no one at a major university seems capable of doing

00:56:57.140 anymore, which is to tell feminists who make up the majority of Cornell's student body and the

00:57:03.560 majority of every college campus in the country that they should be held accountable for their

00:57:07.620 own actions. And if they can't function in our society without guardrails, which is what they're

00:57:12.960 saying, then maybe we should talk about those guardrails again. You know, just the past few

00:57:19.460 months, we've been told that women can't be held responsible for systematically killing their own

00:57:24.080 children. They can't be held responsible for butchering their friends and carving pentagrams

00:57:29.560 into their bodies. And now they can't be held responsible for getting drunk and voluntarily

00:57:34.700 participating in group sex at a frat house. Put it all together, and it sounds like after a century

00:57:41.660 of feminist victories, both political and cultural, they no longer want the responsibilities and the

00:57:48.500 privileges of full citizenship. They're saying they simply cannot take ownership of their own

00:57:54.620 actions, and they need adult supervision at all times. And what they don't seem to realize is

00:58:02.040 that outside of their sheltered Ivy League campuses and the newsrooms on the East Coast,

00:58:06.600 that message is being received loud and clear. That'll do it for the show today. Thanks for

00:58:13.720 watching. Thanks for listening. Talk to you tomorrow. Have a great day. Godspeed.

00:58:18.500 Every significant movement in history has started with protesting.

00:58:25.500 You're a traitor!

00:58:26.500 Uncle Tom!

00:58:27.500 This is our generation's civil rights!

00:58:28.500 I have no idea what the protest is about.

00:58:30.500 Bingo!

00:58:31.500 Given the current climate, we should have figured as polarizing as Clay Saunders can even be

00:58:36.500 allowed on campus.

00:58:37.500 Ah, can you hear me okay?

00:58:38.500 Saunders is a close personal friend of Chancellor Friedman.

00:58:40.500 This is a decision I cannot find.

00:58:42.500 Islam will conquer the West.

00:58:45.500 Assalamualaikum.

00:58:48.500 Are we paying attention?

00:58:50.500 They've taken over the building.

00:58:52.500 They're downstairs and they've blocked the doors.

00:58:55.500 I seek forgiveness from Allah the Almighty.

00:58:59.500 We cannot run and hide.

00:59:01.500 Mohammed is the messenger of God.

00:59:04.500 There is no God but Allah.

00:59:07.500 What do you say we turn those SOBs into a fine red mist?

00:59:13.500 As we move, one man will cover while the other guys go.

00:59:17.500 They call that leap project.

00:59:18.740 Stretch them out and listen.

00:59:21.480 You need a course in safe weapons handling.

00:59:30.060 Now, we've all heard the radio ads about owing the IRS money.

00:59:34.140 They try to scare you and frighten you into calling.

00:59:37.620 Well, tax relief advocates is different.

00:59:40.060 If you owe the IRS $5,000, $50,000, or $500,000,

00:59:45.060 T.R.A. has a solution to resolve your tax problem.

00:59:48.520 Don't lose hope.

00:59:49.460 T.R.A. could reduce or even eliminate what you owe.

00:59:52.100 Their passion is taxes and helping regular people and businesses fix their IRS mess.

00:59:57.780 They have over 1,000 five-star Google reviews and an A-plus with the Better Business Bureau.

01:00:03.080 You don't have to be afraid of the IRS anymore.

01:00:04.740 Real tax relief programs are available that can give you a fresh start, so don't wait.

01:00:09.000 Go to TRA.com, it's TRA.com, or call 800-575-1753.

01:00:15.620 Again, that's 800-575-1753.

01:00:19.120 Tax relief advocates, real solutions for real people.

The Matt Walsh Show - October 05, 2026

Ep. 1850 - New Evidence in the Cornell 7 Case Completely Blows The Accuser's Story

Episode Stats

Transcript