The Michael Knowles Show - Ep. 596 - Racist⧸Harris 2020

00:00:00.000 Joe Biden has picked his running mate. After weeks of speculation, we can now say with

00:00:06.160 certainty that Joe Biden's vice presidential candidate is going to be California cop Kamala

00:00:12.700 Harris. Here is what Kamala had to say about this wonderful honor.

00:00:16.940 When Vice President Biden was in the United States Senate working with segregationists

00:00:21.960 to oppose busing, which was the vehicle by which we would integrate America's public schools,

00:00:28.460 had I been in the United States Senate at that time, I would have been completely on the other

00:00:33.100 side of the aisle. And let's be clear about this. Had those segregationists their way,

00:00:38.180 I would not be a member of the United States Senate. Cory Booker would not be a member of

00:00:41.940 the United States Senate. And Barack Obama would not have been in the position to nominate him

00:00:46.000 to the title he now holds. And so on that issue, we could not be more apart, which is that the

00:00:55.060 vice president has still failed to acknowledge that it was wrong to take the position that he

00:01:00.620 took at that time. Oh, I'm sorry, that wasn't Kamala accepting the running mate spot. That was

00:01:07.140 when Kamala smeared Biden as a vicious, vicious racist during a presidential debate. Obviously, 1.00

00:01:15.340 Joe Biden probably has no idea that they've picked Kamala Harris to be his running mate,

00:01:19.280 because the Democratic Party doesn't view people as people. They view them in slots for divvied up

00:01:25.520 identity groups. Well, we will hopefully inform the former vice president as he watches

00:01:31.260 this show today. And we will break down exactly what this means for the race,

00:01:36.360 what this means for the broader project of the left. I'm Michael Knowles. This is The Michael Knowles Show.

00:01:39.960 The Michael Knowles Show.

00:02:09.940 There's no reason to suggest that that's any different than other regular American shoppers.

00:02:16.020 That's probably... There's no distinction as far as the left is concerned. We will get to this

00:02:21.420 significant news, the Kamala Harris pick. First, though, I've got to thank our friends over at

00:02:25.560 ExpressVPN. You know, there's a lot of censorship these days on social media. You might have noticed.

00:02:31.720 Maybe you're not seeing this show quite as often on YouTube or elsewhere. That's just what happens.

00:02:37.440 Big tech is now actively suppressing conservatives. This has a lot to do with the election, but it

00:02:43.300 happens in non-election years, too. The left wants to silence and remove any voices they don't disagree

00:02:49.280 with. Remember, Twitter was supposed to be an open platform. It doesn't seem so open anymore. Instead

00:02:54.100 of letting social media sites revoke your right to free speech, how about revoking their right to your

00:02:59.840 data? Now, one thing you could do is you could just deactivate all of your social media platforms.

00:03:05.700 That just sort of lets them win, though, doesn't it? You don't want to do that. Instead, I would

00:03:10.140 recommend ExpressVPN. So, you know, social media sites make all their money by tracking your searches,

00:03:16.720 your video history, everything that you click on, and then selling your valuable data. When you use

00:03:21.160 ExpressVPN, you anonymize much of your online presence by hiding your IP address. That makes your activity

00:03:26.580 much more difficult to trace and sell to advertisers. You've got to watch it. I do not go online now

00:03:31.740 if I don't have a VPN installed. I highly recommend you do, too. It's finally time to say no to

00:03:37.880 censorship. Take back your online privacy at expressvpn.com slash Michael. By visiting my special

00:03:43.380 link, you will get an extra three months of ExpressVPN service for free. That is expressvpn.com

00:03:49.140 slash Michael, expressvpn.com slash Michael, to protect your data today. Especially now that we

00:03:56.360 got Kamala the cop running as the VP pick. You know, she might look, it might happen. The entire 1.00

00:04:00.960 liberal establishment is pushing for the Biden-Harris ticket. A lot of people have tweeted in and they've

00:04:06.900 said, what do you think of the Harris ticket? Does it help Biden? Does it hurt Biden? My view on it is

00:04:11.340 it was his only choice. I mean, I've assumed that it was going to be Kamala Harris for weeks now

00:04:16.720 because Biden backed himself into a corner. In the name of diversity, Joe Biden said that he was

00:04:21.140 going to pick a very specific woman and she's got to be black. And so he really limited his scope of

00:04:28.960 people. In the name of diversity, he limited himself to, I don't know, what, three or four

00:04:34.720 people around the country. One name that was floated was Susan Rice. Susan Rice was the fall man for

00:04:39.600 Benghazi in the Obama administration. And as the Durham investigation comes out into all of the

00:04:44.340 corruption of the Obama admin, probably not a great idea to pick Susan Rice. So she wasn't going to 1.00

00:04:48.620 work. Karen Bass, as we've explained on this show many times, is an actual communist. So Karen Bass is

00:04:53.980 the head of the Congressional Black Caucus. She's a, you know, she's congressman. She's actively supported 0.83

00:04:59.780 Fidel Castro in her career. That was a little bit radical even for today's Democratic Party. And so you're

00:05:04.800 left with this third choice, very flawed choice, extremely unlikable, but she's the last one left

00:05:10.140 because of the identity politics of the left. You got Kamala Harris, who is, I guess she's a black 0.76

00:05:16.260 woman or she's a woman of color, at least. She ran a terrible presidential campaign. The first thing 1.00

00:05:21.920 she did was hire up all of Hillary's people. So Hillary, 2016, one of the worst presidential 1.00

00:05:27.580 campaigns ever run. And then Kamala Harris, because she is a sort of just establishment candidate, 1.00

00:05:32.940 she hires up all of those people. And she launched a particularly vicious attack on Joe Biden. 1.00

00:05:37.580 During the primaries, that attack was that he's a racist, that he worked with segregationists,

00:05:42.860 that he opposed busing. Busing is not exactly a popular issue in 2020, but she launched it. She

00:05:49.200 thought it was her best attack. It flopped. But I guess in the end, it worked out because she's

00:05:52.120 going to be his running mate now. And I think the slogan is going to be racist, Harris, 2020. I don't

00:05:57.620 know how convincing that's going to be. Kamala, though, is not the only endorsement that Joe Biden got

00:06:02.640 over the past couple of days. He also got a very much more powerful than Kamala Harris. He got the

00:06:08.120 endorsement of China. This, according to Nancy Pelosi, Nancy Pelosi went on TV. She went on CNN

00:06:14.520 to describe the state of the race. And I don't know why. I think she may have been having a senior

00:06:19.140 moment herself. She admitted what we all know, which is that China, America's number one geopolitical

00:06:24.580 adversary, is rooting for Joe Biden. But the Chinese, what they said is China would prefer

00:06:32.260 Joe Biden, whether they do, that's their conclusion, that they would prefer Joe Biden.

00:06:37.880 Is that a good thing? I mean, what she's referring to here is Bill Evanina, who's the director of the

00:06:43.840 National Counterintelligence and Security Center. He suggested that Russia, you know, is rooting for

00:06:49.880 President Trump. I mean, they've been suggesting this since 2015. But that China and Iran would 0.96

00:06:58.100 prefer Joe Biden. And it just shows you how in their own bubble Democrats are. That Nancy Pelosi

00:07:04.000 thinks that an endorsement from China will help him. Because this is what we've been told for the

00:07:09.740 past 30 years. The kind of liberal establishment with some Republicans and certainly all of the

00:07:14.320 Democrats have hailed the rise of China. They've encouraged it. They've actively supported it at 0.97

00:07:19.680 various times. And the idea here was that if you rise up China, if you give them a lot of money and

00:07:25.100 you let them cheat on trade deals and you let them steal technology, then eventually they're going to

00:07:29.500 be super duper rich and they're going to democratize. It's sort of like make China very, very rich, step A.

00:07:36.380 Step B, we don't know. Step C, they're going to become a Madisonian republic. It's that step B.

00:07:43.100 It just hasn't happened. It hasn't happened at all. And then China obviously inflicted on us this 0.81

00:07:47.400 Wuhan virus, which has shut down the entire world for the past six months.

00:07:52.000 So there are a lot of problems here. They've taken a lot of American jobs. They've stolen a lot of

00:07:55.620 American technology. They've spied on us a lot of times. They've cheated on trade deals. They've

00:08:00.160 devalued their own currency. I mean, they've done all these sorts of terrible things. But according to

00:08:04.320 the global world order, China is good. This is why Mike Bloomberg didn't want to criticize China.

00:08:08.360 This is why three of the four big tech oligarchs when they testified on Capitol Hill didn't want to

00:08:13.120 criticize China. Only Zuckerberg would even admit that they're stealing our technology.

00:08:17.460 That view is not a left-right thing. That's a liberal establishment over the entire world

00:08:23.140 thing compared to we the people, compared to common sense people on both sides of the aisle.

00:08:30.680 And on this divide, if you kind of shake yourself out of this mere left-right Republican-Democrat

00:08:35.580 divide, if you see it more as we the people who want politics versus the administrative technocratic

00:08:42.260 elites, you see that Joe Biden's campaign is only geared toward that kind of administrative state.

00:08:48.500 We'll get to that in one second. However, first, I've got to thank our friends over at Raycon.

00:08:54.300 You know about Raycon. I've told you about Raycon before, haven't I? You need a pair of wireless

00:08:58.460 earbuds. That is mandatory in 2020. If you still have wires dangling from your ears, it's like you're

00:09:05.260 living in the Stone Age. You need to get them. They make life much easier. Raycon earbuds started

00:09:11.360 about half the price of any other premium wireless earbuds on the market. And they sound just as

00:09:16.740 amazing as the other top brands that you know. I'm not going to name names, okay? I'm not going to

00:09:21.420 go throw stones at people, but I am going to say Raycon. They sound great. They're a totally fair

00:09:25.860 price. They look really good, too. Their newest model, the Everyday E25 earbuds, are their best ones

00:09:30.780 yet with six hours of playtime, seamless Bluetooth pairing, more bass, and a more compact design that

00:09:35.480 gives you a nice noise-isolating fit. Raycon's earbuds are so comfortable. They are perfect for

00:09:41.840 conference calls. They're perfect for listening to podcasts, especially perfect for listening to

00:09:45.360 The Michael Knowles Show. Highly recommend that. The company was co-founded by Ray J and a bunch of

00:09:50.760 other celebrities. Now is the time to get the latest and greatest from Raycon. You can get 15% off your

00:09:57.600 order right now at buyraycon.com slash Knowles, K-N-A-W-L-E-S. That is buyraycon.com slash Knowles,

00:10:05.160 K-N-A-W-L-E-S, for 15% off Raycon wireless earbuds. What's that address? I'll tell you again,

00:10:10.800 buyraycon.com slash Knowles. This is the real issue, I think. The issue is not one of right versus left.

00:10:19.640 It is we the people versus the administrative state, the elites who appoint themselves to govern

00:10:25.500 this whole country without any real accountability to the voters. I think that's the big difference

00:10:30.500 here. And we've talked about that before. It's been called the administrative state, the deep state,

00:10:34.460 the bureaucracy, the technocracy. That is who Joe Biden is running for. One thing that was so shocking

00:10:41.520 about the Kamala Harris pick is that she attacked him harder than anybody else in the Democratic 1.00

00:10:47.980 primary. And she attacked him in a particularly vicious way. You know, there's nothing worse that you 1.00

00:10:53.040 can be called in modern America than a racist. Racism has just become the term for bad. I mean,

00:10:58.520 it's become the term for evil. And she went after him that way. So why pick him? It's because the

00:11:03.240 Democrats don't look at individuals. Right? Joe Biden is not an individual. Joe Biden is an empty

00:11:09.720 suit. He is the absence of a candidate. He is not only the absence of a candidate in himself because

00:11:15.180 there's a lot of wind blowing in between his ears. He is also the absence of a candidate in the

00:11:19.720 campaign. He's not campaigning. He's not going out there. They just want someone to be the face

00:11:24.640 of the bureaucracy. And as far as that goes, Kamala Harris fits the description as well.

00:11:30.580 What does Kamala Harris believe? That's going to be the title of my next brilliant blank book. It's

00:11:36.620 going to be called What Kamala Harris Believes, A Comprehensive Guide. There's not going to be

00:11:41.060 anything in it, obviously. She will switch her opinions based on public opinion polls. She will lie 1.00

00:11:46.700 through her teeth. I mean, she wanted to pander on that show, The Breakfast Club, one time. So she 0.87

00:11:50.500 talked about how she loved smoking joints and listening to Snoop Dogg when she was in college,

00:11:54.580 years before Snoop Dogg ever even made an album. Now, I'm not, I don't know if she smoked pot or

00:11:58.820 she probably didn't smoke pot. It's just a thing that she says to pander. She doesn't care. 1.00

00:12:04.120 And the same goes for Joe Biden. Joe Biden tweeted out yesterday something that I think typifies

00:12:09.240 his candidacy and what it means for the Democrats. He says,

00:12:13.340 I promise you, if I'm elected, I won't waste any time getting this virus under control.

00:12:19.660 I'll call Dr. Fauci and ask him to stay on. I'll bring together top experts and leaders

00:12:25.340 from both parties to chart a path forward. We'll get it done together.

00:12:31.520 If your entire campaign is, I'm going to give all my power to Dr. Fauci, why don't I just elect

00:12:36.560 Dr. Fauci? Why am I electing you, Joe Biden? His whole candidacy is, I'll get other people to do

00:12:43.140 stuff. I'm Joe Biden. I'm Joe Biden. You have to elect me so that I can get other people to do

00:12:47.840 things. First of all, Dr. Fauci hasn't been right about anything. I mean, Dr. Fauci has been completely

00:12:53.700 wrong. He's been in that job for what, 40 years now. No one's ever elected him. He's just the face

00:12:59.320 of the bureaucracy. And what Joe Biden is saying here, he says, we'll keep Fauci on. We'll get,

00:13:04.340 what he's saying is we will return away from this crazy Trump moment where we, the people got a voice

00:13:11.040 all of a sudden, we will return to rule by the administrative state. This project began 100

00:13:17.220 years ago with Woodrow Wilson, where Woodrow Wilson explicitly says this. He says, we want to

00:13:22.740 divorce politics from administration. So what's politics? When you go out there, you give a speech,

00:13:29.020 you say, we got these issues and we're going to fight for these issues. And then some other

00:13:31.880 candidate says, we're going to have other issues and we're going to oppose that other guy, right?

00:13:35.580 That's politics. And then you decide. Administration is just carrying out orders, right? You know,

00:13:42.540 an administration exists in every institution. So who decides then what the rule is? Well,

00:13:47.640 increasingly the rules are being made by these headless bureaucrats at these agencies that have

00:13:54.260 no accountability whatsoever. You know, the presidents come and go, but the bureaucrats remain

00:13:59.420 the same. And so the left views this. They say, ah, yes, finally, we get to just plug in

00:14:06.460 absolutely pointless people to enforce our agenda that we were going to do anyway.

00:14:12.560 And what is the name for this? Well, the Washington Post is already calling it historic. Historic.

00:14:17.560 This from Jennifer Rubin, who is a Democrat, she's a Democrat writer at the Washington Post,

00:14:23.100 who for some reason pretends to be a Republican, but she, she doesn't support anything Republican

00:14:27.500 support. She doesn't support any Republican candidates and she's in no way a conservative, 0.97

00:14:30.960 but, but the fake news is so fake that they will look you in the, they will, they will hire a

00:14:36.080 Democrat, have her write Democrat columns every single week, and then tell you she's a conservative. 1.00

00:14:41.160 That happens all the time. So the headline for this column, it's been a rotten process,

00:14:46.160 but we can appreciate the milestone of the first female VP. First female VP. 0.58

00:14:53.360 Because Biden's already won, I guess, according to them. You know, this headline is assuming that

00:15:00.740 Joe Biden's going to win. They're just assuming it. Because of course he'll win. That's what we

00:15:05.160 want. And that's the science of history. And that's, that's where we've got to go. And, you know,

00:15:09.660 Trump wasn't supposed to win the first time. There was an accident, some glitch in the system,

00:15:13.100 but don't worry, we're going to cheat him out of it this time. And, and this time Joe Biden is

00:15:18.500 going to win. If, if they're just talking about the first female VP candidate, first of all, 0.65

00:15:23.000 we've had other female VP candidates before, but we had one very recently. We had one in 2008. 1.00

00:15:27.680 It was Sarah Palin. You remember her? Do you think the Washington Post was publishing columns?

00:15:31.200 You know, this is a wonderful milestone. It's historic. It's so important. It's so wonderful

00:15:36.300 that she got picked. I don't think so. There's nothing historic about it. Joe Biden told us months ago,

00:15:43.780 he was going to pick a woman. So what's historic? There's no surprise. He didn't even have to write 0.62

00:15:48.300 this column, but that's how they view it. You know, what was really historic?

00:15:54.360 Trump's victory. Because no one thought that was going to happen. Because we were told 99%

00:15:58.360 chance Hillary wins. That was historic. You know, it was historic. The popular Tea Party movement.

00:16:03.620 That was, that was a genuinely grassroots campaign of completely peaceful protesters who would show up to

00:16:10.540 a rally site and leave that rally site cleaner than it was before they got there.

00:16:13.780 They weren't stealing Gucci or Nike sneakers. That was historic. But for some reason,

00:16:19.180 that never goes down in the annals of history. And the reason for this is the left has believed

00:16:23.640 for over 100 years that they've discovered the science of history. They know what's going to

00:16:28.300 happen. They know what progress is. So you can either be on the right side of that or the wrong side of

00:16:31.400 that. When, when things contradict their view of history, they ignore them. You know, they say,

00:16:37.780 oh, that wasn't supposed to happen. But then they get right back on the track. The mainstream media

00:16:41.620 knows what's going to happen in the future. That's why they're already running stories on the future.

00:16:44.980 The mainstream media are bracing for sexist attacks on Kamala Harris. Take a listen.

00:16:51.620 Ali, good to talk to you about this. So tell us a little bit about these groups and what kind of

00:16:56.560 negative attacks are they bracing for based on what we've seen with previous women politicians 1.00

00:17:02.400 and candidates who have run for political office. You know, it's one thing when the Democrats report

00:17:09.700 fake news, when something happens and then the Democrats lie about it or they spin it so egregiously

00:17:14.520 that you can't recognize it. It's another thing entirely when the Democrats spread fake news about

00:17:20.780 things that haven't happened yet. They, yes, these groups are bracing for sexist attacks. We know

00:17:27.600 they're coming. Oh yeah. You know what Trump is going to say? Oh, it's so true. He should be

00:17:32.020 impeached for what he's going to say. He's, you know what these right wingers are going to say?

00:17:35.120 They should be censored on social media for the things that they haven't yet said, but are going

00:17:39.300 to say. That's it. I mean, that's the science of history, right? They're, they're predicting what's

00:17:44.180 going to happen. Meanwhile, just a note on sexist attacks, just a note on that previous female 1.00

00:17:50.300 vice presidential candidate for the Republicans. Did you ever see these kind of pearl clutching,

00:17:56.660 hand-wringing, ringing, ringing segments about Sarah Palin after the awful, what you could call

00:18:03.280 sexist attacks on her? No, I don't think so. Do you think anyone was predicting, oh, you're going

00:18:08.520 to be the awful attacks on Sarah Palin? No, because the same people who are worried about those attacks

00:18:12.080 on Sarah, on, on Kamala Harris were the ones launching the attacks on Sarah Palin. So the MSNBC

00:18:19.320 feminist reporter, I don't know, I don't know what her actual title is. She gives this report on what's 1.00

00:18:24.960 going to happen. A lot of these women's groups are looking back at 2016 and seeing the way that

00:18:30.380 President Trump used to dog whistle all the time about Hillary Clinton's gender. I remember I used

00:18:35.420 to hear him say things like she lacked the strength and stamina to be president. You're not allowed to

00:18:41.820 say that about Hillary Clinton, Hillary Clinton, who famously lacks the strength and stamina to be 1.00

00:18:46.120 president. You're not allowed to say that about her because she's a woman. It doesn't matter if it's 1.00

00:18:50.060 true about the individual. She's a woman. And so you're not allowed to say that. And specifically,

00:18:54.940 she's a Democrat woman. Notice implicit in the argument here. They're not asking,

00:19:01.360 does Hillary Clinton lack strength? Does Hillary Clinton lack stamina? Hillary Clinton famously passed 1.00

00:19:07.200 out as she was walking to her car during that campaign. She was always fatigued. She admitted this

00:19:12.460 in an interview. She said, I'm chronically fatigued. I fall asleep the second I sit down on airplanes.

00:19:17.220 So it's obviously true of her that she lacked the strength and stamina. But what the left says is

00:19:24.480 we don't care about the particulars. We don't care who's running in 2020. Who's Joe Biden? Who cares?

00:19:30.460 He's just a filler. He's a filler for history, which will inevitably move toward the left. And

00:19:36.480 he'll do whatever we want. Kamala Harris, same thing. She said a bunch of stuff. She smeared our top 1.00

00:19:40.340 kid. No one cares. No one's voting for either of these people. These people are very unlikable.

00:19:45.540 They're just voting for the left-wing project broadly. Left-wing project broadly, by the way,

00:19:52.460 might win. That's the worry. Because a lot of people don't want to engage in politics.

00:19:59.100 You know, I'm here at this Claremont Fellowship and we're talking about the founding and what that

00:20:03.220 means and how it's played out over the course of American history. And John Marini, one of the

00:20:07.600 scholars here, made a great point yesterday, which is that increasingly everything is politicized.

00:20:12.200 The NFL is politicized. The MLB is politicized. Nike shoes are politicized. Everything in our

00:20:17.880 whole culture is politicized, except for politics. Except for politics. You must have a political

00:20:26.260 opinion about every single thing on earth, but you are not allowed to have a political opinion

00:20:31.040 about politics because politics has been taken away from the people and given to these faceless 1.00

00:20:37.040 bureaucrats. Some of them occasionally pop up and you remember their name like Dr. Fauci.

00:20:40.640 But they're the ones making our political decisions for us. All the little alphabet agencies that

00:20:45.820 operate out of the executive branch but have no accountability to it, really, they're the ones who

00:20:50.280 are actually ruling us. And in part, I think it's why the left distracts us with a bunch of stupid 1.00

00:20:56.220 side issues. It's so that we can all chatter about some nonsense and not engage in actual politics, 0.99

00:21:02.280 which is being done by the left-wing experts. So we've got the dog whistles that are certainly going

00:21:09.260 to come against Kamala Harris. And the only people hearing these dog whistles are leftists. What does

00:21:14.900 that say about them? It seems to suggest they are the dogs. But regardless of these sexist attacks,

00:21:21.900 I got to say this for President Trump, at least he can bring himself to say the word woman.

00:21:27.440 The same cannot be said of CNN, which recently gave a report on not how pregnant women are reacting

00:21:34.320 to COVID. They coined a new phrase, pregnant people.

00:21:41.160 Women are feeling nervous about expanding their family or starting a family because of the pandemic.

00:21:46.860 Why?

00:21:48.140 That's exactly right, Anne-Marie. And they're worried for two different reasons. One,

00:21:52.460 simply health reasons. There's so much that we don't know about the coronavirus in general,

00:21:57.040 and then how that impacts pregnant people in a unique way.

00:22:01.420 Pregnant people. Hold up a sec. Now you just realize that wasn't even CNN. You expect this 1.00

00:22:06.180 step of CNN. That was CBS. That was a network news channel. That was something that a lot of people

00:22:12.880 watch. A lot more people watch that than watch CNN. So this kind of language, this taking away sex,

00:22:19.000 taking away gender, eliding everything, this weird doublespeak, this is now infecting the total 0.91

00:22:25.900 mainstream, right? The actual networks for CBS. That's happening on the other ones as well.

00:22:32.180 So she coins this term pregnant people. But the thing you have to remember is this is so unnatural, 0.98

00:22:38.180 right? It's so unnatural to deny that biological sex exists. It's perhaps the fundamental fact of

00:22:44.860 our nature, sex. So they say it, they get their talking points, they're told how to describe gender,

00:22:50.740 but then she slips in the very same segment. She refers then to women.

00:22:54.640 You have this perfect storm of a public health crisis combined with what we're anticipating to

00:23:01.900 be a gigantic economic crisis. And the result is that a lot of women and families are simply saying

00:23:08.240 now is not the right time to be either starting or expanding a family.

00:23:12.860 A lot of women and families. Why use the phrase woman in one place, but not in the other place? 1.00

00:23:18.420 There was another term that was coined by the media the other day,

00:23:20.860 individual with a cervix. There was some media outlet said, yes, I think it was CNN. It's always CNN.

00:23:28.080 In my mind, they're all CNN. In any case, they said, you know, cervical cancer specialists are saying

00:23:34.780 that individuals with a cervix should get screened for cancer. There's a shorter phrase for individuals

00:23:41.620 with a cervix. There is a more precise phrase for people who get pregnant. It's women. 1.00

00:23:50.340 So even this woman on, on this, even this individual with whatever body parts that she has, 0.97

00:23:56.140 this person says, you know, we're talking about women, right? Because she kind of loses her train

00:23:59.980 of thought. But what is being pushed and normalized is this idea that sex doesn't matter at all. And this

00:24:06.640 is extremely degrading to women. I never want to hear that Trump is demeaning toward women or sexist

00:24:12.020 against women or misogynistic or whatever. Again, I don't want to hear it because there's a song called

00:24:16.860 WAP. Is it WAP or W-A-P? I don't know. This is put out here by an artist named Cardi B. I know that

00:24:23.760 Ben got in trouble for this the other day because Ben just read the lyrics of this disgusting song.

00:24:28.860 It's probably the most disgusting song I've ever heard. This is actual audio pornography, 0.82

00:24:32.660 which I didn't know could exist. Ben got in trouble for it. So, you know, obviously we've

00:24:37.480 got to get into it here. I didn't even watch Ben's clip, but people were very upset that he

00:24:42.420 was calling this out. So it made me go and listen to the song. This thing is so obscenely degrading

00:24:48.520 to women, but that's not just, that's not the only point I have to make about it. If that were it,

00:24:52.480 you know, look, that's rap music. Rap music is always degrading to women. 1.00

00:24:55.000 The point about this is the degradation of the individual and the degradation of American society

00:25:04.480 and the degradation of our interpersonal relations. So the song begins, I'll have to

00:25:09.240 clean this up as I go, I suppose. It opens up with a repeated line. There's some whores in this house 1.00

00:25:14.860 sung by a woman. She's very proud of this. She's accepting her identity as a whore. She's reveling in 1.00

00:25:21.940 that. Spit in my mouth, look in my eyes, saying, you know, degrade me. I want to be degraded and I 0.99

00:25:29.220 want you to acknowledge that you are degrading me while you do it. I don't cook. I don't clean.

00:25:34.920 But let me tell you how I got this ring, AA. I'm skipping around to just the lines that I think

00:25:40.860 really tell you something here. The language of most of it is so disgusting. I certainly can't read it

00:25:45.960 on the show. But listen to that. I don't cook. I don't clean. But let me tell you how I got

00:25:51.920 this ring. What she's saying is marriage is transactional. No man would want to marry a

00:25:58.240 woman because he loves her, because there is something lovable about her, because he wants

00:26:02.680 to give of himself to her. A man would only marry a woman to get something. And so what could he get? 0.92

00:26:10.320 Well, the traditional model that we're rejecting is that, you know, men marry women so they can cook 1.00

00:26:15.580 and clean for them. But what this enlightened, empowered woman is saying is, no, we don't do that. 0.89

00:26:21.200 That would be degrading. This man condescended to marry me because I do filthy sexual acts on him 0.99

00:26:28.640 all the time and I allow him to degrade me. And that's why this is much more empowered. 0.98

00:26:34.100 Now, of course, this is a caricature of what marriage used to be. Marriage was not merely a

00:26:38.560 fact of you go and you hire a woman to cook and clean for you. There's a little aspect of that. But 0.88

00:26:43.620 more, it's about giving yourself to the other person in this union for life.

00:26:47.800 But because of that progressive misunderstanding of the past, which, you know, the past has to be

00:26:53.380 awful, so things always have to be worse in the past. And things, we also apply this highly economic

00:26:59.520 model of interpersonal relations, very selfish model of interpersonal relations. We apply that

00:27:04.280 retroactively on the past, even as we reject it. So she's viewing the past through that lens. But

00:27:09.740 then, because now we're all enlightened and everything's about sex, she's saying, no, no, no.

00:27:12.700 It's much more empowering that I conned my husband into marrying me by performing a lot of strange

00:27:21.640 things on his body. Ask for a car while you ride that thingy. I don't know. I won't use her language. 1.00

00:27:31.700 Ask for a car, right? As in, I'm not doing this to my husband because I love him. He's not doing it to

00:27:37.960 me because he loves me. This is just transactional. But don't forget, we're not talking, you know,

00:27:43.880 it says there's some whores in this house. What Cardi B is saying here fundamentally is that the 0.99

00:27:49.420 relations between the sexes are transactional and all women are whores. I mean, that's the point here, 1.00

00:27:58.080 is even with your husband, you are engaging in something that is no different from prostitution.

00:28:04.120 Uh, another line here, he bought a phone just for pictures of this, uh, particularly desirable 1.00

00:28:12.540 genitalia. Again, she uses different words. He bought a phone for it. So she's kind of tricked 0.97

00:28:19.180 him into spending money to a third party, right? To this kind of capitalist culture, some company,

00:28:26.420 to turn me into a porn actress so that he can then go away from me and do whatever he's going to do to 0.72

00:28:36.860 himself looking at these pictures, right? It's, it's, you're divorcing, you're making it so transactional 0.94

00:28:42.600 that by the end of that line, the woman's not even there anymore. She's not even the one performing the

00:28:48.580 sex acts. She has become nothing more than a commodity that you are using. Not, you know, you're,

00:28:53.960 you're not just using her to get a thrill in person. You're using her to get a thrill in perpetuity

00:28:58.320 on yourself. Pay my tuition just to kiss me on this desirable genitalia. Now make it rain if you 1.00

00:29:07.160 want to see some desirable genitalia. Put me through school. Don't put me through school to make me 1.00

00:29:12.700 better, to, you know, edify me so that we can have this wonderful life together. No, no, no. It's just a

00:29:17.260 con. Even education here is just about getting something over on the other person. The way we think of

00:29:23.280 love and education traditionally is it makes us better. It's a positive good, but not here. It's

00:29:30.260 all a zero sum game for the left. And then this, this line, oh my gosh, switch my wig, make him feel

00:29:36.860 like he cheating, put him on his knees, give him something to believe in. There it is. Switch my wig,

00:29:43.780 meaning I'm going to dress up like I'm not me. I'm going to be somebody else. And this is going to

00:29:50.160 excite my husband. It's going to make him desire me because my husband is getting tired of me. He's,

00:29:57.000 he no longer desires me. This kind of cheap transactional sex has run its course. So now I'm 0.88

00:30:02.080 going to, I'm going to get even more perverse. I'm going to pretend like I'm some other, other woman. 0.70

00:30:07.800 And that will finally excite him a little bit more, at least for now. And then the key, put him on his

00:30:11.820 knees, give him something to believe in. Because he, he believes in nothing. She believes in nothing.

00:30:17.200 None of these people believe in anything beyond the satisfaction of their own selfish appetites

00:30:22.080 and desires. And so she will make an idol out of not just herself, but a very particular part of

00:30:28.380 herself. And this will finally give him something to believe in. It's an acknowledgement actually,

00:30:33.180 that man is fundamentally a religious being. It's an acknowledgement that we want something that is

00:30:37.560 beyond this world, that is beyond the satisfaction of our selfish desires. But we have no outlet for that.

00:30:42.560 We don't know, we don't even know how to talk about that anymore. And so the nearest we can get

00:30:47.500 is audio pornography to, to describe a way to trick your senses into believing that you've transcended

00:30:55.660 that appetite and, and given, given into something higher. There was a similar literary analysis made

00:31:02.860 about this by Suki Hana. I don't know who that is. We'll get to that in one second. First though,

00:31:05.900 I got to thank you. I got to thank you for going over and subscribing to the Michael Null Show

00:31:10.500 YouTube channel. There are many reasons to head on over, to like, subscribe, and most importantly,

00:31:15.300 share the videos on that channel. And the main one is YouTube's messing with us. They don't want

00:31:20.360 people to see those videos. So head on over. YouTube has now demonetized half of all of our videos,

00:31:26.960 which I don't really care about because I don't get a percentage of that money. So I don't, you know,

00:31:30.540 that's fine by me. I don't care. You know, Ben's not going to get as much on the view. That's fine.

00:31:34.520 But people aren't going to see it. People aren't seeing this kind of stuff. They are,

00:31:38.140 they are throttling the show. So please head on over and specifically share. That really helps

00:31:41.980 us out. Also, let's talk about All Access. All Access members get to join in All Access Live.

00:31:47.320 I did one last night. It was great, you know, because I've been traveling the past couple of

00:31:50.140 weeks. So it's always good to check in and hang out with the Daily Wire members. Right now,

00:31:53.960 if you join All Access, you get two, not one, but two leftist years tumblers with your membership,

00:31:59.500 as well as early exclusive new Daily Wire products, which you saw last week with our limited

00:32:04.180 edition collector's baseball bat that, you know, sold out before I could get a copy.

00:32:08.920 It was only available to All Access members. So sign up right now. Head on over to dailywire.com

00:32:14.400 slash Knowles. You get 20% off All Access with coupon code ACCESS. Dailywire.com slash Knowles,

00:32:20.820 coupon code ACCESS to get 20% off your membership. We'll be right back with a lot more.

00:32:25.040 So after we've just indulged this literary analysis of Cardi B, WAP, oh, you know, oh my gosh,

00:32:46.680 it just occurred to me. That's the acronym that Cardi B is talking about for her particularly

00:32:52.640 desirable genitalia apparently. So that's, that's gross. Here is some YouTuber, performer, I don't 0.98

00:32:59.100 know, Suki Hana talking about what the, what the song means to her. I feel like being like sexual

00:33:07.880 like, I don't see nothing wrong with that. Cause baby, I got three kids and I mean, I got these

00:33:15.280 kids from and at the end of the day, me being a hoe, like these people say, like, honestly,

00:33:22.160 I liberate a lot of, a lot of hoes. You feel me? When I hear Cardi talk about popping some 1.00

00:33:27.980 me and my is witty. Like we, that liberate us because it's like you self-respect as hoes. 0.98

00:33:34.600 Cause how y'all got self-respect? Like, I don't think y'all got self-respect like that. Cause first

00:33:39.660 of all, you supposed to tax these, that's self-respect. You feel me? Like I just, it

00:33:46.060 make me feel liberated. Like I love crossing boundaries. Cause guess what? Scared money

00:33:50.520 don't make no money. If you're going to be scared to get that money, you won't be scared

00:33:53.120 to be yourself and say, this who I am. Then you ain't going to get that coin like that.

00:33:57.360 You're not going to get that coin like that. Cause scared money don't make no money. And human

00:34:03.100 relations, including the most intimate relations, including the, one of the deepest desires of

00:34:09.220 our heart, love for another person. It's all just about money, making money as a biological

00:34:15.280 point. Uh, that woman, Suki Hana describes the way that she produced her children. Only

00:34:21.500 one of those, uh, actually in, uh, led to her children that she describes to activity. Only

00:34:27.340 one of them actually did it. So there's some confusion. There's, there's some confusion on

00:34:31.120 the broader point. What is our relationship about? I think a lot of people today view sexual

00:34:38.880 relationships and romantic relationships as transactional. You do this for me. I do this

00:34:44.080 for you, you know, both on sort of dates. It's like Tinder culture, swipe right. Like,

00:34:48.460 okay, I'm going to pay for dinner. And then, you know, whatever, we'll see what happens and

00:34:51.220 shake hands and never see you again. Uh, but there's also, you also see this in relationships.

00:34:56.100 I mean, even, even at a kind of higher level than this, but not much higher, you see people

00:35:00.200 say, oh yes, I picked my spouse because she's going to, she's going to help me in my career.

00:35:04.100 I'm focused on my career and it's going to go this way. And I need someone who does this

00:35:07.060 and therefore, and she'll be good. And, you know, or vice versa, this person's going to

00:35:10.360 make a lot of money and then this will help here. And it's all about you. Prenuptial

00:35:14.380 agreement, same thing. It's all about you. How are you going to protect yourself when this

00:35:17.740 thing eventually breaks off? It's all about, you got to make sure you get yours. Very different

00:35:22.460 than the traditional view. You know, Elisa likes to remind me, we're Catholic. There's no

00:35:28.620 out, there's no out. This is it for life, man. Uh, and, and there's something really

00:35:33.860 healthy and salutary about, about that knowledge that this is about much more than a transaction

00:35:40.440 and selfish desires that, that there are certain bonds that are unbreakable, but in our consumerist

00:35:45.360 culture, we don't have that. And that's not actually just the left's fault. It's also the

00:35:49.160 right. I mean, the right in its obsession with economics in the last 30 years, basically selling

00:35:54.700 out their principles just to make an extra buck on whatever policy is, is popular of the day,

00:35:59.700 pretending that free trade is the greatest international unfettered free trade. That's

00:36:04.480 the bedrock conservative principle. No, of course it's not politics. We want to conserve things. We

00:36:10.060 want to conserve the good. Free trade can be wonderful, but, but free trade, all of these

00:36:15.040 kind of technocratic policies that are administered by bureaucrats, they are subordinate to a real

00:36:21.640 politics, to an authentic politics where we decide for ourselves what we want and where we can

00:36:28.280 ideally live the virtues, which people are not living when they, when they listen to and perform

00:36:33.200 WAP. So President Trump, I think he's a lot, a lot better for women than any of this kind of stuff.

00:36:40.880 And by the way, you can just track it too. There have been a number of surveys done of happiness,

00:36:45.140 so take it with a grain of salt. But since women's liberation, since we were told that degrading 1.00

00:36:50.120 sexual activities actually empower women, women's happiness has declined precipitously, both relative

00:36:58.360 to men, obviously, you know, and in absolute terms, it's declined. This idea that women are going to be 1.00

00:37:05.080 empowered and happy and flourishing up, it hasn't happened. The opposite has happened. But we can't

00:37:10.520 let Trump off the hook. Because Trump made a comment, it was sexist, misogynist, chauvinist, 0.86

00:37:17.520 isst, isst, I don't know, is so terrible. The left is furious. He was asked about the vice 0.97

00:37:22.400 presidential pick and, you know, Kamala Harris or any of these other women. And he said, well, you

00:37:26.360 know, Biden said he was going to pick a woman. And I think a lot of men are offended by that.

00:37:31.340 Take a listen. First of all, he roped himself into, you know, a certain group of people.

00:37:37.700 He said he had to pick a woman. He said that. And, you know, some people would say that men are

00:37:43.740 insulted by that. And some people would say it's fine. I don't know.

00:37:48.460 Look, some people would say that. OK, I'm not saying that. But maybe I could say that if I

00:37:53.340 wanted to say that, which I haven't done. But some people certainly have. I love the Trump

00:37:59.400 circumlocution to just get ideas out in the world. He's absolutely right. Men should be very offended

00:38:04.780 by what Joe Biden said. Not because he picked a woman running mate. I don't think she is going to

00:38:11.200 help him in particular. But that's not. It's not the fact that he picked a woman. It's the fact that

00:38:16.380 he's picking a woman simply for being a woman. He's picking a black person simply for being a black 0.99

00:38:21.140 person. As if to say, I don't care about any of the qualities that this person has. I just want to 0.85

00:38:27.480 check this box. And so I'm going to cut off half of the population, more than half the population, 0.83

00:38:32.600 because he said it has to be a black woman. I'm going to cut off more than half the population. 1.00

00:38:37.500 I don't care what the content of their character is. I don't care about their virtues.

00:38:41.740 Because I just want to check this box. The individuals, the people don't matter. We're

00:38:45.300 riding this wave of history. We're on the right side of history. So you just have to fill in the

00:38:49.120 slots. We were talking to the same great scholar, John Marini, yesterday about this. And this problem

00:38:58.220 of the individual is a big one. I mean, this problem of not being a... They don't view the people in any

00:39:06.460 way as individuals. They just view them as vessels to advance their agenda. Martin Luther King's

00:39:16.720 line. I have a dream that one day my children will play with white children and they won't be judged

00:39:22.260 by the color of their skin. They'll be judged by the content of their character. What Marini was

00:39:26.100 pointing out is that line doesn't make any sense today. It's not a meaningful phrase. People don't

00:39:32.060 know what it means. Because in order to judge someone on the content of their character,

00:39:37.000 you have to have an objective standard by which to judge character. And the left has destroyed that.

00:39:41.600 The way you used to do it is by the virtues, by objective virtue, which you can name and you can

00:39:49.280 measure. And we were all told it, but we no longer share that view of mankind. Objective virtue has been

00:39:56.000 replaced, in John Marini's words, by subjective values. And values are just preferences. You and

00:40:02.880 I, we can have whatever values we want. It's like, yeah, I value chocolate ice cream, you value vanilla

00:40:08.620 ice cream. I value Coke, you value Pepsi. I have it right. You can't judge them. And so you can't judge

00:40:14.780 someone on the content of their character. The left doesn't even want to try. They're only judging

00:40:18.220 them, not on metaphysical criteria, but on physical criteria. And that's it. That's all. So they've got

00:40:24.260 their DNC speakers, right? Obviously, Biden and Kamala are going to speak. We've got Bill Clinton.

00:40:29.780 If he's not, you know, in an orange jumpsuit because of what's come out about the Epstein 0.63

00:40:34.140 Island, he'll be there. Somebody tells me he'll get out of it. Although I don't know if this might

00:40:39.580 be finally Hillary's last revenge. Watch out, Bill. Bernie Sanders is going to speak. Andrew Cuomo,

00:40:46.080 who has handled coronavirus worse than any governor in the entire country. Andrew Cuomo, whose policies are

00:40:52.100 responsible for killing thousands of senior citizens? He'll be speaking because, don't forget, 1.00

00:40:57.120 the Democrats anointed him before coronavirus. It doesn't matter what he does. He can do no wrong.

00:41:03.980 So, for instance, the Democrats are furious at Trump for, you know, the way he's handled coronavirus.

00:41:10.620 On every objective measure, Cuomo's done worse, but they like Cuomo. So Cuomo, he's shown leadership.

00:41:17.360 He's going to be, I don't know, who knows? He could replace Joe Biden, for all that we know, at the convention.

00:41:23.060 But most likely he won't. So Cuomo is going to speak. Whitmer, also terribly, she's handled this whole thing

00:41:29.020 terribly. She's governor of Michigan. She'll speak. Schumer, Kerry. Oh my gosh, these people are just,

00:41:33.720 they've been around forever. AOC, that's the one kind of new person who's been anointed as a leader of the

00:41:38.240 Democratic Party. And then my favorite speaker at the DNC, John Kasich. John, you remember that name,

00:41:45.200 John Kasich? John Kasich is the formerly Republican governor of Ohio. His father, you might remember,

00:41:54.840 his mailman. John Kasich, he's taking this principled stand, principled, that he's going to

00:42:00.340 oppose Donald Trump. Principled conservative stand. He's going to vote for Joe Biden and Kamala Harris,

00:42:05.320 the most pro-abortion ticket in American history. Principled stand. So what's it really about? 0.66

00:42:10.540 Kasich was interviewed about this. And Kasich defended his decision to speak at the DNC. The

00:42:16.440 way he defended it shows you the big issue of politics here. Again, it's not just left-right.

00:42:22.080 It's this issue of we the people versus the self-appointed benevolent better elites. Kasich in

00:42:27.620 his own words. I think I have a right to define what it means to be a conservative. Hold up.

00:42:32.720 No, you don't. You, John Kasich, have less of a right than anybody in this country, probably

00:42:39.880 including Jennifer Rubin, to define what it is to be a conservative because you're a sellout. You're

00:42:44.100 a hack. You don't believe in anything. You're not conservative. Even if we just judged you by 0.94

00:42:50.060 your policies and nothing else that pertained to your political career, you're kind of a moderate,

00:42:55.260 squishy Republican. You don't have any right to define what it means to be a conservative. Just a

00:43:00.000 minor technical point. Here's the substance of his defense.

00:43:03.740 And that means a government when necessary, not opposed to it, that what the conservative

00:43:10.460 movement ought to be is opportunity for everyone. The Republican party ought to be a party that has

00:43:15.000 a positive message of lifting everyone. But, you know, Aaron, look, leaders walk a lonely road.

00:43:20.440 And if you're not prepared to walk a lonely road and do the things that your conscience tells you to

00:43:24.640 do, then how do you think about yourself when you look in the mirror? I mean, I'm comfortable with

00:43:30.000 the decisions I make. Of course, there's blowback. You know, Republicans are critical. Some are praising

00:43:34.920 me. Democrats are debating themselves. Should he be able to do this? But this is not an unusual place

00:43:41.140 for me to be. I've been a reformer almost all my life. I've been very independent. And I'm a Republican,

00:43:46.500 but the Republican party has always been my vehicle, but never my master. You have to do what you

00:43:52.480 think is right in your heart. And I'm comfortable here. How many times did John Kasich use the first

00:43:58.720 person singular pronoun in that defense? Compare this, no one's picking up on this, but it sums up

00:44:06.740 the whole issue. What principles did John Kasich just allude to? What big political issues, what broad

00:44:14.100 political vision did he allude to? None. His references were to himself. Well, look, I look at myself in the

00:44:22.000 mirror and I'm very comfortable with me and I've done a good job and people are criticizing me and

00:44:26.300 people are praising me and I think I've done good and I've got this idea and the Republican party's

00:44:30.620 fine, but it's really just about me. Me, me, me. I, me, my. All through the night, I, me, mine. I, me,

00:44:35.720 mine. I, me, mine. Me, me, me. And that's basically the entire never Trump coalition that's left. How many

00:44:45.040 are there left? Like three or four people. They pretend it's about principles. It's not. It's just about

00:44:50.860 them. Themselves. They can't articulate. They always say Trump is a narcissist. These people are

00:44:57.220 much more narcissistic than Trump. At least Trump is doing something. Trump had that great meme out 0.98

00:45:02.760 the other day. Said, they're not coming after me. They're coming after you and I just happen to be

00:45:09.540 in the way. That's it. That sums it up. He always talks about we the people. Hillary Clinton in 2016

00:45:16.420 said, it's about me. You know, I'm with her. And he said, I'm with you. That shift of who the eye is

00:45:24.900 here and who the object is here. That tells you a lot. Ronald Reagan said this too. He said, people

00:45:29.480 have always called me a great communicator. It's not that I'm, I'm the great communicator. It's that

00:45:32.660 I'm communicating great ideas, great ideas from the heart of the American people. It's about you.

00:45:38.780 It's about other people. We the people. That's a big distinction here for the Democrats. They don't

00:45:45.760 care what you want. They don't care what you are prioritizing. They don't want you to engage in

00:45:52.900 authentic politics. They're going to tell you what to do. They've got the kind of liberal agenda.

00:45:57.740 They're not even going to really ask. They're just going to enforce it through the administrative

00:46:00.620 state, the deep state, the bureaucracy. And the Republican candidate here, Trump, is saying

00:46:07.080 something else. He's saying, we're going to empower you. It's going to be weird. It's not

00:46:09.500 going to follow all the conventions that we've had in recent years, but we're going to do that

00:46:14.360 anyway. And we're going to crack up this administrative bureaucracy. Those are the choices.

00:46:21.480 Those obviously cut across party lines. Obviously, John Kasich is going to speak at the DNC.

00:46:26.940 But that's a much more important distinction than Republican Democrat or conservative liberal or

00:46:32.560 whatever. That is a big distinction. Are we going to have politics? Are we going to engage in it?

00:46:36.700 Are we going to empower people to choose things for themselves? Or are we not? That's your choice

00:46:42.900 in front of us. You've got empty suit racist, empty suit VP, whatever, 2020. That's the Democratic. 0.94

00:46:50.060 And obviously, they'll change their tune. And Kamala Harris will say, Joe Biden's the least racist guy

00:46:53.220 in the world. What they're saying doesn't matter. They are, they're not, obviously, they're not listening

00:46:59.540 to we the people. They are going to push that same agenda that they always have. And then you've got

00:47:04.760 Trump. And you'll like him, you'll hate him, you're lukewarm, warts and all. You've got Trump giving a

00:47:10.600 voice to the people. That's your choice. Let's see if your vote will count in November. That's our show.

00:47:16.760 I'm Michael Knowles. This is The Michael Knowles Show. See you tomorrow.

00:47:34.760 We're available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and wherever else you listen to podcasts.

00:47:40.780 Also, be sure to check out the other Daily Wire podcasts, including The Ben Shapiro Show,

00:47:45.720 The Andrew Klavan Show, and The Matt Walsh Show.

00:47:47.880 The Michael Knowles Show is produced by Ben Davies. Executive producer, Jeremy Boring.

00:47:53.760 Supervising producers, Mathis Glover and Robert Sterling. Technical producer, Austin Stevens.

00:47:59.460 Assistant director, Pavel Widowski. Editor and associate producer, Danny D'Amico.

00:48:04.940 Audio mixer, Robin Fenderson. Hair and makeup, Nika Geneva. Production assistant, Ryan Love.

00:48:11.720 The Michael Knowles Show is a Daily Wire production. Copyright Daily Wire 2020.

00:48:15.760 You know, The Matt Walsh Show, it's not just another show about politics. I think there are

00:48:20.580 enough of those already out there. We talk about culture because culture drives politics and it 0.69

00:48:25.600 drives everything else. So my main focuses are life, family, faith. Those are fundamental.

00:48:32.760 And that's what this show is about. I hope you'll give it a listen.

The Michael Knowles Show - August 12, 2020

Ep. 596 - Racist⧸Harris 2020

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript