00:07:56.720That's and I mean cheap in a specific way
00:07:59.600Sports Illustrated hit the goldmine with their swimsuit cover
00:08:03.120I suppose 20 years ago whenever they established that because it was that obviously it's a sports magazine
00:08:08.820So it's about athletics. It's about athletic people. It's about that athletic bodies and they had a swimsuit
00:08:14.400issue and it really was a big hit and then it became kind of a cultural icon and it's a very
00:08:19.380specific kind of cultural icon because it focuses on a very exceptional kind of high-end beauty
00:08:26.320and so that beauty would involve symmetry and signals of youth because that's part of
00:08:33.060beauty sexual beauty physical beauty waist-to-hip ratio for women but with sports illustrated it's
00:08:42.000also highlighting a kind of athleticism in body type and that's a very specific form of beauty
00:08:48.880you have to be young you have to be female generally you have to be extremely athletic
00:08:54.340you have to be shapely in a very particular way and that would be with a waist to hip ratio of
00:08:59.3600.68 because that's what's being established cross-culturally as ideal from the perspective
00:09:04.260of male sexual interest let's say but that's also associated with fertility and so it's a
00:09:11.920marker that has a biological basis and so even if you're a very beautiful woman you're you're
00:09:19.020hard-pressed to be beautiful enough to be on the cover of sports illustrated for the swimsuit
00:09:23.940issue and so it's a very it's a pinnacle achievement of sorts and it's focused on a very
00:09:30.100idealized and specific form of beauty and that's obviously exclusionary it's obviously exclusionary
00:09:37.420it excludes everyone right and and it does that to highlight a kind of ideal and that's
00:09:45.060a particular ideal of beauty and there are some cultural boundaries around that so you could say
00:09:50.160well it's a westernized form of beauty it's like yeah and you can point to rubens paintings of
00:09:55.500more plump women and say well there's an exception it's like great you think you're a genius for
00:10:00.920finding that exception good for you you know the rubens painting like more power to you but that
00:10:06.400doesn't mean anything at all about the universality of images of beauty. And so
00:10:11.320the cover bothered me a lot because it was a cheap manipulation of
00:10:15.400something that had been working very well for Sports Illustrated. It was also
00:10:19.720an insistence that all of a sudden this non-athletic body type is as beautiful
00:10:27.340as the standard swimsuit model for Sports Illustrated. And it's not. It's not as
00:10:34.640athletic and it's not as healthy and that's that and it's also not arbitrary and so the whole thing
00:10:40.740is a lie and then it's a lie that's a manipulation of that young woman now she partakes in that
00:10:47.820because she participates in it but it's still they're not on her side they're exploiting her
00:10:53.380as far as i'm concerned and she may be participating in that exploitation but they're still exploiting
00:10:58.860her so don't pull any moral stunts on me because you're irritated about my opinion about the sports
00:11:05.180illustrated cover when it's bloody clear to anybody with eyes that that was manipulative in
00:11:09.22020 different ways and so and i'm also not willing to sacrifice these ideals for inclusiveness it's
00:11:17.820like no not everyone's a genius no not everyone's picasso no not everyone's young and healthy and0.99
00:11:25.380no not everyone is a sports illustrated swimsuit model period and fuck you if you don't like it0.98
00:11:33.880so that's basically what i thought about that i certainly didn't think it would cause as much0.98
00:11:40.100trouble as it did you know when people were on my case for being mean it's like yeah i know i'm
00:11:44.420always mean because you know that's well also like life is hard and like life is mean right
00:11:51.660and it's hard for people first first of all i have great sympathy for anybody overweight because of
00:11:56.300the health struggles i went through and you lost a whole bunch of weight it's not like being
00:12:00.640overweight's fun right no that's a whole other problem to get into with um i think people have
00:12:06.680such an issue losing weight yeah that society has said you know what it's fine because you've
00:12:12.860had so much trouble it's probably your genetics so well there's truth in that like when i look at
00:12:18.180someone who's obese on the street i think oh that's too bad like that's too bad i i don't think0.97
00:12:23.980you know obese pig eats too much has no self-control i don't think that i think0.50
00:12:29.180uh bad mismatch between genetic proclivity and appalling diet and the appalling diet is0.80
00:12:36.540basically we're not going to get into this but basically carbohydrate heavy and sugar loaded
00:12:41.040and fair enough you know we try to hard the whole world to make calories cheap and we did that we
00:12:47.020No one's starving and great, but now we have an obesity problem and it's a major problem. And I'm not going to pretend that it's okay. It's not okay. That doesn't mean I don't have sympathy for it. And I'm not willing to sacrifice any ideals for this idiot inclusiveness. I'm done with that. And so should everyone else be. And most, I think most people are.
00:13:07.880and they look at that cover and they know it's manipulative and and a lie in a deep sense
00:13:14.400but then if you point that out and this is where we're at in the culture there's all sorts of
00:13:18.420things now if you point to it and you say you know that's a lie people get upset it's like no
00:13:23.780that's a lie you're just that's not a lie you're just being mean we're just being nice it's like
00:13:27.3201984 yeah yeah yeah no it's a lie yeah it's like here's another lie every 10 year old knows what
00:13:34.600gender they are and that's so fixed that surgical intervention may well be necessary and it's
00:13:41.880illegal for you to suggest otherwise however your gender identity is so fluid that you can change
00:13:48.740it every hour if you want and it's not fixed at all and it's and it's infinitely variable at
00:13:55.240your whim okay i'm supposed to accept all of that am i every single bit of that set of propositions
00:14:02.960even though they're entirely internally contradictory which means it's actually
00:14:08.520impossible for me to accept all of those propositions and to stay sane well yeah but
00:14:15.080if you don't you're mean it's like you're a predator well that brings something else I want
00:14:19.180to talk to you about I've been thinking about this a fair bit I talked to Franz de Waal
00:14:22.920primatologist genius primatologist in my estimation yeah and I don't know if there's a
00:14:27.560Nobel Prize that would be specifically appropriate for Franz De Waal, but he, if there was a Nobel
00:14:33.400Prize for the sort of science he's doing, he would deserve it because he's discovered things that
00:14:39.140are really, they're unbelievably fundamental. For example, he's discovered that sometimes in
00:14:44.940chimp troops, the smallest male is the alpha. Really? Yeah, that it's not dependent on power.
00:14:51.480A smaller chimp can be alpha, for example, if he has the support of one of the older females who has strong kin connections within the troop, but also is a sophisticated social actor.
00:15:07.020And I don't mean manipulator, and I don't mean dominator, because DeWall has established very, very clearly, and this is signally important work,
00:15:14.960that status and authority in a chimp troop
00:15:19.680and that is associated with reproductive success
00:15:22.060is much more dependent on the ability to reconcile
00:15:26.020and the ability to maintain reciprocal positive relationships
00:16:10.100and she'll share it with the other chimps that she trusts and she'll get hyper upset if they
00:16:14.980do anything to it that you wouldn't do to an infant whereas if you give a doll to a male
00:16:19.980juvenile or a group of males yeah you make a face they tear it apart see what's inside of it
00:16:24.780yeah and that's and that's funny because that's that you know that that's kind of the stereotype
00:16:30.400for what a young boy might do so let's take this apart and see what's inside of it it's like well
00:16:35.080there's a hunting devouring element of that but there's also a gadget like curiosity and there's
00:16:41.540good work on chimps showing that oddly enough the male juveniles if you give them cars or like toy
00:16:48.600cars or dolls they'll take the cars which is pretty damn weird because it's not like chimps
00:16:52.960have cars they have infants but they don't have cars i guess they roll well it's more fun well
00:16:58.500it probably has something to do with tool use preference is that they're more gadget oriented
00:17:03.580even chimps because they do use tools to some degree um or maybe it's just that they're not
00:17:09.300maternal yeah right so it's just the other thing it's yeah it might be that and i don't think the
00:17:14.620work on on that preference is developed enough to be sure but we do know that likewise in human
00:17:21.960beings the biggest difference that we know of between men and women um is their interest in
00:17:27.880people versus things and so but i was really struck by the the carrying around of the wood
00:17:34.100block the infantilization of the wood block and it made me think because i had been reading
00:17:38.860putting two weird ideas together i'd been reading this guide to a faculty retreat that mount royal
00:17:45.100university in calgary had published and i had read and it was just it was such an appalling
00:17:50.860document so there's very few things in life that are less dangerous than going to a faculty retreat
00:17:56.880at a college like the the faculty don't bring axes and pitchforks and they're not Vikings and
00:18:02.500they're not cannibals and they don't devour each other and the probability of getting in a fist
00:18:06.260fight is like zero or lower and they're just not dangerous in any they're no they're as safe as any
00:18:13.820social event could possibly be made with like 250,000 years of civilized effort and yet the
00:18:21.520guide that the college published indicated quite clearly that trained counselors would be on hand
00:18:27.600just in case just in case the discussion got too intense and i thought this is written by
00:18:34.160oedipal mothers for kindergartners and i was thinking about that in relation to
00:18:39.080dewall's work and and into the broader culture war that were knee deep in neck deep in
00:18:45.060uh forehead deep in maybe um so here's a hypothesis imagine that there's a default ethos
00:18:55.320that governs what constitutes the basis for an appropriate social relationship whether it's an
00:19:04.460intimate relationship a friendship a relationship with your family members or relationship with
00:19:09.160people in the broader community imagine that there's an ethos a way of interacting that
00:19:13.260would characterize optimality across all those domains simultaneously one female default is
00:19:20.580you're either an infant or you're a caregiver or you're a predator
00:19:27.220and i think a lot of that's playing out in the world now now but what where does that come from
00:19:33.740well i think it comes from the the fundamental ethos that governs mother infant bonding i mean
00:19:39.700look one of the one of the issues that women and female chimps for that matter struggle with
00:19:49.100terribly is the lengthy period of dependency that highly intelligent primate infants
00:19:57.300are characterized by and so a female chimp will carry her infant 500 miles in in the first three
00:20:05.780years she has to carry the infant they can claim to but she has to carry the
00:20:09.720infant everywhere it's an unbelievable burden it's an unbelievable burden and
00:20:14.300so and it's partly because it's worse even in human in humans because human
00:20:20.300infants are born even less able than chimpanzee infants and there's a reason
00:20:25.640for that it's like a noodle yeah well hey they're like a fetus they're actually
00:20:30.380They're actually fetal in in a very real sense. So the human cortex is so large that
00:20:38.820There's an arms race between the size of the infant's head and the the the width of the pelvic opening through which birth must take place and
00:34:48.960So kind of like woke people maybe aren't as bright.
00:34:52.540Well, I think you might be able to say the same thing about people who hold a very low-resolution, schematically conservative viewpoint, you know, where they don't deviate from tradition at all.
00:35:45.460It was one of the biggest correlations we ever saw in any study.
00:35:48.040It's higher than the correlation between IQ and grades,
00:35:50.940which is really something because those measures are kind of the same thing yeah it was yeah so
00:35:56.900wow so and you know there is evidence in the university setting too that the most politically
00:36:02.920correct disciplines are those who are simultaneously most dominated by females and
00:36:08.660that have the least bright students are those also the ones that don't actually lead to jobs
00:36:13.140they just well they lead to jobs now oh yeah they've created this entire ecosystem so that
00:36:18.820your humanities degree matters yeah well your your your women's studies degree let's say or
00:36:24.700yeah sorry yeah well lumping all the humanities together no you don't want to do that you don't
00:36:29.700want to do that but um and so you know this is part of a broader discussion that we can't have
00:36:36.840in our culture which is what's the evidence that the feminine ethos scales to regulate families
00:36:44.660or broader communities because we've introduced women into the broad political discussion and
00:36:49.380we've introduced women to every level of social organization but we have no evidence that women
00:36:55.460can produce those sorts of organizations now maybe they can and maybe it's also a great positive that
00:37:02.160they are and i think there's lots of evidence for that i mean so for example it's clearly the case
00:37:07.600that countries where women are more educated and when where women are granted more rights
00:37:12.980seem to do far better economically now whether that's because the women are free which might
00:37:19.500be the reason or because the cultures that tend to be more open to female participation
00:37:24.340are also more open to innovative ideas of all sorts right because it's very difficult to
00:37:30.120distinguish between those two we don't know but we also know that if you educate women
00:37:35.120their children are more motivated to pursue higher levels of education which isn't doesn't
00:37:41.460seem to be the case. So if you try to predict how far a child will go in terms of their education,
00:37:46.340you can use mother IQ, father IQ, child IQ, and then you can use mother education and father
00:37:52.420education. And the IQ measures are relevant and mother's education is relevant, but father's
00:37:58.260education isn't. So, and it isn't obvious why that is. Maybe women are pushy on behalf of their
00:38:05.680children, right? So like, oh, I got an education. You need an education more than a dad. It may be
00:38:11.000that women who are educated are better at acting out the implicit valuation of education in it like
00:38:18.820at very early ages maybe they read more to their children we don't know but but so but what i'm
00:38:25.400saying is that i'm not making a blanket case that the introduction of women into more sophisticated
00:38:31.460forms of social no larger scale forms of social organization was like a non-starter and hopefully
00:38:38.760it isn't because half the brain power in the world is in the hands of women we don't want to
00:38:43.860just leave that lying on the table that would be a mistake for everyone but we also don't we have
00:38:49.020no evidence whatsoever that the maternal ethos scales and i think i don't think it does i think
00:38:57.180that large-scale organizations have to run on on conscientiousness not on agreeableness like and
00:39:04.700There's evidence for that, too. So it might actually be negatively correlated with agreeableness. Well, right, we've looked at what predicts success in
00:39:15.020organizations and the two biggest predictors are IQ because
00:39:19.700IQ is general cognitive ability and that's just how fast and well you can solve any problem that requires
00:39:26.960abstraction and solving it faster is obviously better if it's an important problem because it's more efficient the other predictor is
00:39:33.280conscientiousness, not agreeableness. In fact, in the managerial domain, there's some evidence that
00:39:39.500agreeableness is negatively correlated with success. And I think that's because agreeable
00:39:44.180managers get taken advantage of, they can't discipline their employees properly, and they
00:39:48.980get resentful. They feel bad, right? Like what happens if you have to fire somebody who is having
00:39:54.300a really hard time, right? And then it's like, oh, I'll let them stay in the company and then let
00:39:58.460your company fail. Well, worse than that, even I think they're prone, and I think this is the
00:40:01.860fundamental problem with agreeableness in in in some regard as an ethos is you're completely susceptible to
00:40:09.600manipulation by narcissists and psychopaths and we know this technically we know this biologically so imagine that you set up a game a simulation where
00:40:19.200Everyone is cooperating you could cheat but everyone cooperates. Well, you can set up a pretty stable game
00:40:25.100That's composed of nothing but cooperators
00:40:28.120But if you introduce one cheater one shark the cheater takes everything
00:40:33.840And so that and this is this is a chronic problem for societies is like as soon as you set up cooperation as the norm
00:40:41.280The desirable norm the iterable norm the sustainable norm the productive norm that means those who mimic
00:55:05.440How much motivation does a young man need to overcome his fear of rejection and establish a relationship with a woman and the answer to that is
00:55:15.600We don't know but sexual deprivation could easily easily be part of it
00:55:21.780Because you to do something difficult. You need a lot of motivation
00:55:26.160You need frustration working for you. You need fear working for you. You need
00:55:31.240Lust working for you. You need loneliness working for you to bind a man and woman together
00:55:36.900Especially if they're going to produce children. This is a very very difficult thing to do successfully and so