The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - August 22, 2026


Carney Blows Up His Own Bad Deal - Pretends It's A Liberal Victory


Episode Stats


Length

27 minutes

Words per minute

188.96

Word count

5,285

Sentence count

177

Harmful content

Toxicity

26

sentences flagged

Hate speech

10

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 so prime minister mark carney ended up blowing up his own bad trade deal last night and now he
00:00:06.720 and all of the liberals are pretending that this was a master stroke of policy on his part
00:00:12.800 no it was not it was a bad deal three days ago we all knew it was a bad deal do you know who
00:00:19.360 didn't realize it was a bad deal apparently until two seconds before the deadline
00:00:24.240 prime minister mark carney he was calling it a good deal up until the very last second because
00:00:30.960 he's incompetent he's a terrible negotiator he's waited a year and a half giving up a lot of
00:00:36.560 concessions for nothing building no new leverage and also not being willing to give up really 0.99
00:00:42.800 stupid things that would actually potentially get us benefits on the other side and here we are
00:00:47.680 still no deal 50 u.s tariffs on five percent more of our exports good job liberals but of course 0.99
00:00:55.800 there's going to be tons of liberals online and people in the media pretending like mark carney's 0.85
00:01:01.000 keeping us safe he is the warm embrace that canadians crave he sucks at his job i'm sorry
00:01:09.240 wasn't he elected in 2025 because he was going to get us a good deal so far the best he's he can do
00:01:16.600 is almost continue to sign really bad deals,
00:01:20.200 have us badger him for multiple days straight,
00:01:22.740 and then he pulls out at the last minute
00:01:24.340 and then gives himself a pat on the back
00:01:26.080 because I said I was never going to sign a bad deal.
00:01:28.880 It's like, okay, you also had a second half to that promise
00:01:32.640 that you were going to get a good deal,
00:01:34.120 and we haven't budged an inch since Election Day.
00:01:37.360 Actually, no, we've actually gone backwards since Election Day
00:01:40.900 in terms of our actual hand that we have to play in negotiations.
00:01:45.760 Mark Carney has been burning cards this entire time for nothing and acts like he's somehow being very savvy by being non-committal in terms of a final deal.
00:01:56.200 Check out this statement he released about 50 minutes ago or so.
00:01:59.960 I thought this was a little bit of a better statement to show than his really long one yesterday because the long one said absolutely nothing in it.
00:02:07.740 And at least this is a more condensed version.
00:02:10.400 So Prime Minister Carney says,
00:02:12.360 For over a year, Canada has worked intensively and in good faith with the United States
00:02:16.260 to negotiate a new comprehensive trade deal.
00:02:18.960 We have been pragmatic, patient, and persistent.
00:02:21.640 Our goal has been to get the best deal for Canadians.
00:02:24.460 Never get a deal at any price or any time frame.
00:02:27.400 Well, except when he first gave himself a time frame when he became Prime Minister,
00:02:31.080 which was mid-July, and it was the end of July,
00:02:34.660 and then he tried to sign a deal in October that was somehow better than this one he was about to sign,
00:02:39.580 And then he walked away from that one.
00:02:41.720 And yeah, like, no, we always had timeframes, but apparently we're not supposed to care about timeframes anymore.
00:02:48.560 Whatever, I guess, though.
00:02:49.880 He's a genius.
00:02:51.260 He goes on to say,
00:02:53.020 Late last evening, I instructed our negotiators to return to Ottawa.
00:02:56.920 We cannot accept what the U.S. has offered, and we will not give what they have asked.
00:03:02.200 And we'll match the U.S. new tariffs dollar for dollar in order to protect Canadian workers, farmers, families, and businesses.
00:03:08.340 we take the step confident that is the best interest of canadians in the coming days we
00:03:13.060 will release details of these new tariffs measures which will come into force tuesday after labor day
00:03:17.960 um like honestly i don't even know why he doesn't just implement them now that's always the
00:03:23.140 confusing thing do you want to be aggressive or do you not want to be aggressive because as much
00:03:27.620 as i make fun of the elbows up trade strategy it could work if you stick to it but carney doesn't
00:03:35.620 he's all over the place. He's about to sign crappy deals, being overly permissive about
00:03:41.740 certain things, and then he pulls back at the last second, and then he makes a threat,
00:03:46.360 and then he concedes on something in favor of nothing. It's like, can we stick to one strategy
00:03:51.600 here? Because we're being really, really confusing. And I know there's going to be so many people out
00:03:56.460 there saying, well, why aren't you blaming the Americans? I do partly blame the Americans in 1.00
00:04:01.060 the sense that they started this. I don't like it. Yes, we've had dairy and poultry and other 0.95
00:04:05.880 sort of supply management tariffs on them for decades. I don't like that. We also have other
00:04:10.300 regulatory restrictions that block certain U.S. and other non-Canadian goods from entering our
00:04:15.640 market. That's not good. I also don't think exactly justified what the U.S. did. Yes,
00:04:21.800 they pay for our security and we've been lagging when it comes to our NATO commitments.
00:04:25.720 I get it. Still a stupid thing to tariff us. 0.99
00:04:28.960 But I blame our government because I'm a Canadian. 0.99
00:04:33.020 And at the end of the day, although I am patriotic, the thing is I blame the person that is supposed to be serving us.
00:04:39.720 Trump's not supposed to be serving us.
00:04:41.820 So when I see Mark Carney constantly blaming the Americans for everything going on,
00:04:46.600 While not one person in the liberal media or in liberal political circles is investigating the fact that Mark Carney promised he was going to get a good deal and has not been looking into what's been actually going on here, it is maddening. 0.98
00:05:00.300 He sucks, and that is why we are losing. 0.96
00:05:02.860 It's like the other team in a sport pulled a dirty move on your team. 1.00
00:05:08.880 It's like a hockey game, and they've been just making some really dirty plays the entire time, and you lost.
00:05:14.900 And it's like, OK, I didn't like that. We also lost 4-0, and those dirty plays didn't exactly result in why we lost. We lost because we suck. Yeah, I don't like the way they play the sport, but goodness, can we also not suck at the sport? Like, that's what I'm asking here.
00:05:32.180 I want to move on to some clips of Carney speaking at the press conference just a little bit ago.
00:05:37.920 I want to actually start off, which one should we start off with?
00:05:41.440 Let's talk about him doing the dollar for dollar tariff trading thing.
00:05:45.320 And I want to move into his explanation for why he pulled out at the last second of this deal.
00:05:51.060 Now, Canada will match Washington's new tariffs dollar for dollar in order to protect Canadian workers, farmers, families and businesses.
00:06:02.180 Our response will be concentrated in sectors such as steel, dairy, appliances, agricultural
00:06:09.180 equipment, pulp and paper, and electronics.
00:06:12.920 Also include products that are currently subject to unjustified Section 232 and 338 tariffs.
00:06:21.920 This is a focused response, a focused response to protect and defend our industries and allow
00:06:27.760 them to compete with us products in the canadian market this is why i say if you're gonna go
00:06:34.140 aggressive go aggressive in the sense that if the thing is that america can handle the counter
00:06:40.840 tariffs better than we can handle their tariffs so why aren't we saying no what we're going to
00:06:46.380 get even more leverage and go super aggressive we're going to put in place tariffs that are 100
00:06:50.480 tariffs in response now that wouldn't be my strategy i'd probably have taken a different
00:06:55.100 strategy a year and a half ago. But now, why are we just basically slowly ramping up the temperature
00:07:02.260 to where they ramp it up to? Why not do something more? And that's kind of my problem with Mark
00:07:06.800 Carney. He's never taking like some audacious play. Nothing he's doing is smart. And now I'm
00:07:12.960 just thinking about it. Why was he in Italy during the negotiations for this deal? I thought we
00:07:20.480 elected him because he's a great negotiator who has dealt with donald trump before why were you
00:07:26.140 messing around in italy rather than being in the room having the commander in the room leading his
00:07:34.000 troops figuring out what we're willing to give up to get to a better deal and when you actually 0.96
00:07:39.160 listen to what ended up breaking the deal what caused us to walk away it's kind of pathetic it's
00:07:45.240 a bit of a longer video here thank you for sit comedia for uh clipping it sit comedia here if
00:07:50.600 you guys want to go find them on x they uh posted his uh him answering the question from a reporter
00:07:57.280 because obviously he never brought up the entire time of what actually caused the deal to fall
00:08:01.400 apart listened closely to what he brings up because he brings up some stuff about autos
00:08:06.360 that doesn't sound good but the problem is the even with this change not made the auto part of
00:08:12.960 the deal still sucked. We were going to keep in place 15% auto tariffs on most of our auto
00:08:19.940 manufacturing. That's stupid. But listen to the other excuses he bakes into this response. 1.00
00:08:26.180 I'm hoping you can tell us what the specific last minute changes that the Americans proposed
00:08:29.920 that made a deal in Tenable. Thank you. Thank you for the question. Look, I would say two things.
00:08:35.860 One is there are some specifics and I'll give you some examples, but it was also a cumulative
00:08:40.060 aspect as i mentioned in my remarks uh about the by the way that's nonsense when he says it's a
00:08:45.300 cumulative no it's not it's not cumulative over time because up until the last second he and his
00:08:51.780 people were marketing this as a good deal we're going to get to a vashi capellos clip a little
00:08:55.560 bit later where she right after this all happened said well it was surprising because the canadian
00:09:00.640 negotiators and our spokespeople that were running around saying this was a really good deal and that
00:09:05.180 we were happy to sign it and then he suddenly killed it i'm sorry was the thing that was last
00:09:09.920 minute that killed the deal literally in the last minute i don't think so i think he just realized 0.54
00:09:14.820 the canadian public wasn't going to buy this garbage and then he pulled back from it now i'm
00:09:19.340 a conservative in the sense that i want to deal but i don't want to deal at all costs but the 0.93
00:09:24.820 thing is i'm also not going to applaud him for not signing the deal because it's his fault in part
00:09:30.380 that the deals keep being bad and we have to keep pulling back from them.
00:09:34.500 That's my big problem here.
00:09:36.360 Willingness, Donald Trump in total, to enter into a true economic partnership.
00:09:44.660 But in terms of specifics, I'll give you three, and I know there's other questions.
00:09:48.380 First, with respect to the auto industry, both in terms of the level of the tariffs,
00:09:55.140 the treatment of Canadian content, so Canadian parts, Canadian steel, Canadian content in vehicles,
00:10:03.660 the scope of the tariffs, Americans wanted to limit it to autos only,
00:10:09.760 not include medium and heavy autos and light trucks, to be more specific,
00:10:13.180 not include medium and heavy-duty trucks, which is a big change, obviously,
00:10:17.260 and with respect to Ford's new plan, for example, in Oakville, which is F-350s, 450s, 550s.
00:10:24.400 would have been excluded uh gm silverado uh uh same thing would have been uh excluded from that
00:10:31.440 so what this tells me is like one i don't believe him this happened absolutely last minute because
00:10:36.800 from him answering later on it sounds like there was just a clarification and they're saying no
00:10:41.360 when we said it was going to be 15 tariffs on all autos it's going to be 15 tariffs on all autos
00:10:47.040 he's saying well before it sounded like what it was going to be was that we were going to have
00:10:52.720 you know heavy medium and heavy duty trucks were not going to be included which i guess he's
00:10:59.120 thinking well that's okay because then we could just pivot our market towards only building those
00:11:02.960 things it would still not be a good deal because think of all the people who don't build those
00:11:07.280 things that would be going out of business or would be basically having to sell a lot of these
00:11:12.080 cars at like a very thin profit margin or a loss so they can clear out the models that they are
00:11:17.520 currently contracted to build and then they would have to move only to medium and heavy autos
00:11:22.640 like maybe that would make it a little bit better but the 25 steel and aluminum tariffs were still
00:11:27.860 terrible apparently we were going to have softwood lumber tariffs included on this and there was a
00:11:32.500 bunch of other stuff that was going to be included including the u.s being able to trade into canada
00:11:37.260 tariff free while they made tariffs on us so i don't believe him when he says that this is somehow
00:11:43.420 the straw that broke the camel's back the next thing he's going to list as being a problem are 0.97
00:11:49.020 like really dumb so that first auto thing was half dumb okay maybe you could if let's say this 0.98
00:11:55.600 deal was only about the auto thing and we were giving up a couple things in favor of the autos 0.99
00:12:00.760 maybe you could say that was justified okay 15 on the smaller cars and whatnot but maybe our
00:12:07.960 market will just shift towards the medium and heavies and then later on down the road maybe
00:12:11.740 we can figure out how to get the 15 removed on the smaller cars okay i could maybe see the logic
00:12:17.340 there but that doesn't make the deal good the deal still overall sucks and you shouldn't sign it
00:12:22.620 no rationale just for exclusion um so effectively moving into a series of terms that would have
00:12:30.860 would made uh the production more uneconomic over time okay so that's that's that's a change
00:12:38.780 that restriction that clarification that precision um was was a change uh the u.s introduced and by
00:12:45.740 the way again he just said there that that precision that clarification uh that was a big
00:12:50.620 change so it wasn't actually a change he was probably just pretend he might have even absolutely
00:12:56.620 knew what the terms were but he's just pretending to be dumb here after the fact and be like oh i 0.87
00:13:01.180 thought it wasn't going to include uh medium and heavy trucks uh but it does oh that sucks i guess
00:13:06.940 we can't sign it it sounds like he knew it because all he's not saying that this was last minute
00:13:10.460 change he says oh it was a last minute precision so you probably knew it and you're just pretending
00:13:15.660 to not know it and then at the last minute you're like oh does this also include heavy trucks and
00:13:19.980 they're like yeah and then you said like oh i can't sign this it sucks i'm like yeah it's
00:13:24.540 obvious it sucks it sucked three days ago and if i was part of the negotiating team even before that 0.90
00:13:30.060 i would have known that whatever their preliminary plans were also sucked it's not because i'm a 0.91
00:13:34.140 genius just because i'm not an idiot but now here are the other two things he mentions as being the
00:13:39.340 deal breakers at the last uh hours in the last hours um efforts to restrict our ability to have
00:13:45.900 other trade deals you heard me say a moment ago what we've accomplished in the last year 20 new
00:13:51.820 deals economic and security partnership the prospect of doubling our market access because
00:13:57.420 we believe in free trade uh we're the partner of choice in many respects for countries around the
00:14:02.540 world and the americans wanted to restrict that they had language that they wanted to restrict
00:14:06.140 unacceptable that's very vague again there was language that would restrict that the idea that
00:14:12.220 we couldn't maybe go around signing free trade deals and i've even seen some conservative people
00:14:16.940 thinking oh that's insane if america's just restricting our ability to sign free trade deals
00:14:22.140 depends on what he means by that because frankly based on all of the commentary i've heard from
00:14:27.820 the americans over time and again i'm not trying to say it's actually a good stipulation i like it
00:14:32.540 I'm just saying that there could be reasonable things that they asked for inside this terrible deal that I would have never signed.
00:14:38.380 I think that what he's indicating is the Americans were asking for us to basically stop our plans of integrating more with China, because that has been the thing they've always brought up more than anything else.
00:14:50.800 They don't really like our integration with China. It's a national security threat to the U.S.
00:14:55.180 mark carney said they were our biggest national security threat in 2025 and that has always been
00:15:00.280 something that the americans have frequently brought up as an irritant to them and somehow 0.90
00:15:05.220 that's like a thing we're going to fight tooth and nail for that's what makes it so silly carney
00:15:10.240 was about to sign a deal for things i'm like oh my goodness don't give that up or don't accept
00:15:14.920 those tariff rates they're way too high still but so but he was going to sign it apparently that was
00:15:20.260 fine for him but the things that he'll fight tooth and nail for are the china deal and as
00:15:25.780 we're going to get to in a second here bill c11 and bill c18 uh and i'll give you a third
00:15:36.820 continual efforts always resisted as i said in my remarks and always will be resisted
00:15:41.540 efforts to restrict our protections of our language our culture and in effect our sovereignty
00:15:50.780 so elements coming in ramping up any of them individually but collectively uh put us in a
00:15:59.000 position where uh what had been on a trajectory absent those elements for a fair deal a good deal
00:16:07.800 for Canadians, not perfect, but a good deal. That's where I think people need to focus on
00:16:14.080 that last part. One, going back to what he said is the third point, and then the collective
00:16:18.140 point he made at the end. The third point was, oh, our language and our sovereignty and our
00:16:24.520 culture. He's talking about Bill C-11 and Bill C-18. The government basically forcing bad quality
00:16:31.260 government-funded Canadian content onto streaming services. Bill C-18, the online news act that
00:16:36.940 makes it. So I still can access my own Facebook page that I put thousands and thousands of dollars
00:16:42.500 into over time back when I used to write articles for the National Telegraph and I didn't make
00:16:48.280 videos. Because back in the day, it was actually very easy to write articles and distribute them
00:16:52.880 on Facebook. But the Trudeau government, and this is a policy that Carnia stood by, tried to basically
00:16:58.620 extort Facebook saying, pay the CBC and CTV News and the other legacy outlets $50 million a year
00:17:05.380 or whatever the amount of money was going to be.
00:17:07.380 I think I've always heard that that was going to be about the figure.
00:17:10.320 You had to pay them that extortion money
00:17:12.080 or you're not allowed to host news content on your platform in Canada
00:17:17.520 without being fined.
00:17:19.120 Like, what?
00:17:21.000 That's something that we thought was a deal breaker?
00:17:24.440 So the deal breakers were,
00:17:25.960 one, he apparently didn't understand the auto part of the very...
00:17:29.700 He didn't understand the very clear deal on autos within the bad deal.
00:17:35.380 The second one was China, it sounds like, and the third one was we were going to be forced to get rid of Bill C-11, Bill C-18, which I believe most Canadians would dance on the grave of if we got rid of it.
00:17:48.180 That would have been actually one of the really good things out of the deal, but that's the funny thing. 0.54
00:17:52.620 Two out of the three things that were deemed bad, that killed the deal, two of them are things that I would love to get rid of regardless. 0.99
00:18:01.340 I don't want to integrate more with China. Why are we letting them dump EVs into our economy that they stole the designs to make and they didn't have to incur any of the R&D costs? That's actual unfair trade. They steal your R&D, they build copycat products with a little bit of some changes here and there, and then they sell the cheap products sans the R&D costs into your country, and obviously you can't compete because your businesses actually had to go through the research and development for their new products and whatnot. 1.00
00:18:30.760 and the Chinese firms don't but anyways now I want to go into some of the takes the takes if I 0.98
00:18:38.140 can say have been ridiculous the the takes are just I don't even know how to describe this stuff
00:18:46.120 I'm trying to find this one oh did it disappear I hope it didn't but there's there's all these
00:18:51.580 people like trying to slap Carney on the back and act like he just made a master stroke of a
00:18:58.120 decision by pulling out of this when he was the one who thought it was a good deal in the first
00:19:02.660 place while we were all screaming at him that it was a bad deal. I've been doing that the past few
00:19:06.800 days. This is a stupid deal he was going to sign. He was basically getting pushed into it because 1.00
00:19:11.660 he thought he needed a deal, I guess, until he realized, maybe the premiers told him, maybe he
00:19:17.040 saw the people's reaction online that it was bad, and then he finally pulled out. But look at this
00:19:21.420 person. Stella Starfish says, at this point, I'd like to remind everyone that if you blame Carney
00:19:27.960 and his team for getting no deal, you are traitors to Canada. You want the U.S. to destroy our great
00:19:33.860 country and rule over Canada. Remember that one of the stipulations was that they wanted to set
00:19:39.020 Canada's trade policy. That wasn't a stipulation. That was a vague insinuation that Mark Carney
00:19:45.580 made based on the language of the deal, which I believe probably indicates that they had a
00:19:50.200 problem with our China deal, and they wanted us to rip it up, and that apparently is something that
00:19:54.580 we're going to pull out of this bad deal over. Again, there was already good reasons to pull
00:19:59.080 out of the deal. That's a stupid reason to pull out of the deal. I want to then jump over to what 1.00
00:20:05.080 Pierre Polyev said in response to all this. I thought his response was pretty good. Now,
00:20:09.680 a lot of people are saying, like, oh, well, why is he not attacking Carney? It's a hard land to
00:20:15.920 attack Carney. I can do it here because I'm a random YouTuber who can just kind of start
00:20:20.100 sounding off right away. In any party, Daniel Smith made a very diplomatic post. Pure Poly have
00:20:25.640 made a very diplomatic post. I think they're perfectly fine. I think that they're going to
00:20:30.540 have to develop their way of pushing back on Carney and how he's, you know, completely ruined
00:20:35.420 our negotiating stance over time. But for now, this is probably fine. Polyef says conservatives
00:20:41.380 are disappointed that the United States has chosen to impose further and justify tariffs on Canada.
00:20:45.920 They threaten the jobs and livelihoods of families right across our country.
00:20:49.840 Canada must stand united to defend our country against these unfair attacks on our jobs and businesses.
00:20:54.760 Canada cannot accept one-sided tariffs that will de-industrialize our country,
00:20:59.060 which that is an insinuation that the deal that Carney at one point was calling good was bad.
00:21:03.920 It would have de-industrialized us absolutely.
00:21:06.500 Then he goes on to say, nor couldn't we accept a bad deal.
00:21:09.400 Instead, we must continue to fight for tariff-free trade.
00:21:12.340 Later today, I will seek a call of the Prime Minister to discuss what we can do to fight for our workers, businesses, and economy.
00:21:19.180 Conservatives will always put our country first.
00:21:21.460 Conservatives support actions to protect Canadians and our industries targeted by these unfair U.S. tariffs.
00:21:25.840 We also need urgent economic reforms to restore growth, protect jobs, and save our industry.
00:21:31.120 That must include ending the industrialized carbon tax, repealing anti-development laws,
00:21:35.760 greenlighting the 500 economic projects waiting federal approval,
00:21:38.740 and major tax reforms to return investment to our country, reward work, and recharge our economy.
00:21:44.460 I think that's a perfectly fine take.
00:21:46.720 Again, you're probably going to see more aggressive takes from conservative politicians over time.
00:21:51.420 Actually, Jamil Javani, a conservative MP from Oshawa,
00:21:55.180 ended up slapping at Carney a little bit more in his statement last night.
00:21:59.400 There are people out there saying that Polyev should kick Jamil Javani out of caucus for this post.
00:22:06.640 I think it's perfectly fine.
00:22:07.940 it's more aggressive, and I think that most people will read it the right way unless it's just
00:22:13.000 openly taken out of context. But Jamil here says, this is a solemn moment for hundreds of thousands
00:22:19.740 of families across Canada. In homes on every corner of this nation, working people are having
00:22:24.820 tough conversations about what their future looks like and how they will provide for their families.
00:22:30.180 Make no mistake, since the beginning in their public communications, liberal politicians like
00:22:34.400 mark carney and doug ford have put their political self-interests ahead of canadian workers as
00:22:39.520 leaders i believe it's incumbent on us to be servants of the for the people who elected us
00:22:43.280 and the families who are relying on us to bring home the dignity that comes with a paycheck i'm
00:22:48.520 not giving up i will continue fighting for hard-working people in my community and across
00:22:52.520 canada i know what it means to have real questions about putting food on the table and working
00:22:56.860 people to endure hardships canadians should know that conservatives are in your corner and i want
00:23:01.840 to thank Peter Paglia for encouraging me to continue fighting for the country's working
00:23:04.900 people. Now, again, people are saying that this is somehow a bad statement because he
00:23:09.920 jabbed at Carney and Doug Ford there for saying that, you know, they're basically serving their
00:23:14.840 own political self-interests before the interests of, you know, working families. I agree because 1.00
00:23:21.560 the thing is that Carney's not taking these negotiations seriously, in my opinion. He was
00:23:26.340 off in Italy because he knows at the end of the day, if he pulls out of an agreement, he's going
00:23:31.240 to have the media hug bubble tell him he's doing such a good job that was so intelligent for pulling
00:23:36.680 out at the last moment no it wasn't we shouldn't have been in the in the situation where that was
00:23:42.320 the deal on the table that we're going to walk away from you don't approach a deal like that
00:23:46.960 Carney should have been in the room at the start he should be engaging in real horse trading for
00:23:52.360 what we want what we actually need and the thing is that it seems like what Carney is doing is
00:23:58.340 holding on to his own personal wants in these negotiations more than the things that canadians
00:24:03.800 need again his china deal again supply management the the bill c11 bill c18 and again on top of all
00:24:12.040 this he already burned a bunch of concessions for absolutely nothing in return that we could have
00:24:17.100 been using to lower tariffs we have very little leverage we've given up tons of concessions for
00:24:23.060 nothing we keep trying to make these rush deals and then pulling out at the very end and carny
00:24:27.960 seems barely involved the entire time uh just a couple more things i want to show you then that
00:24:34.200 will probably be it for this video because obviously it's a very fluid situation of course
00:24:38.380 we had people like nahid nenshi and other premiers coming out and congratulating the prime minister
00:24:43.820 we don't really need to talk about that it's just not really uh you know worthwhile and i want to
00:24:50.100 just kind of highlight some of these kind of dumb comments online i think really represent 0.57
00:24:54.160 the low-IQ liberal perspective on how Carney's been doing. 0.96
00:24:58.900 This guy Hammer says,
00:25:00.340 the entire world is calling this a great move by Canada.
00:25:03.180 Everyone but Polyev's Conservatives, go do a bit of reading.
00:25:06.780 Most of Polyev's Conservatives are really not even attacking Mark Carney.
00:25:10.260 It was a bad move for Canada.
00:25:12.240 No, yes, it's a good move to not sign the bad deal.
00:25:16.020 But we can't keep having Mark Carney fumble all over himself,
00:25:19.260 about to sign a bad deal,
00:25:20.340 then he pulls back in the last minute and everyone's like,
00:25:23.000 oh so savvy he absolutely absolutely like fails in the negotiating process gets a bad deal on the
00:25:32.120 table and then he's about to sign he's like oh i'm not doing it everyone's like oh wow what a great 0.93
00:25:38.000 job wow what a savvy politician you're not going to sign a piece of garbage on the table 0.92
00:25:43.060 how about we don't get a piece of garbage on the table by doing a better job negotiating i really 0.97
00:25:49.660 like this post by J.J. McCullough that he made earlier, because I thought this was just a good
00:25:55.300 way of putting it when he was responding to the, when he was responding to one of the initial
00:26:00.800 prime minister's points today. Here it is. I made my own quote tweet of it because I thought it was
00:26:07.640 quite good. He said, all the Canadian pundits are braying in unison that no deal is better than a
00:26:13.100 bad deal. I have no idea what this means or what their definition of bad is. 50% tariffs are
00:26:19.420 better than what exactly? Getting rid of the Online News Act that gives them their precious
00:26:24.260 subsidies. And he's absolutely right. And he's making a very specific point here, but I want to
00:26:29.720 turn it into a general point. We actually need to define what good and bad is. That was a bad deal.
00:26:36.400 I don't think Carney should have signed it. But his reasons for why it was bad are bad. And this
00:26:42.700 is why he's a terrible negotiator. I don't know if he actually has the same metrics in his mind
00:26:49.320 that I have in my mind for what we need as a country. We want as low tariff as possible on
00:26:56.120 all of our major sectors. Steel, aluminum, autos, softwood. Those are the things that we want at
00:27:06.340 zero or as close to zero as possible. But it seems like our dealings with China, it seems like C11 0.98
00:27:14.240 and C-18, it seems like supply management and many other things are what is getting in the way
00:27:21.000 of a deal in Carney's mind, not the fact that the tariff rates were still too high on those major
00:27:27.240 sectors. So how am I ever going to have confidence that this guy next time he goes to the table is
00:27:32.920 going to get something good when his definition of what good and bad constitutes is completely
00:27:38.060 out of whack but anyways with all that being said no doubt we will be back later to talk more about
00:27:44.680 this issue but until then make sure you like share subscribe make sure to subscribe if you're not a
00:27:50.380 subscriber and hit the notification bell leave a comment on what you think about all this and of
00:27:55.700 course i'll see you guys all next time