The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - Media Backs Jagmeet Singh's ＂Homophobic＂ Heckler Lie

00:00:00.000 so i'm not sure how many of you have seen that absolutely embarrassing clip of jagmeet singh

00:00:25.120 calling some random guy heckling him homophobic but apparently ctv news never actually saw the clip

00:00:31.200 because they went along with the lie that somehow this random heckler yelling at him was homophobic

00:00:36.720 for no reason the guy just randomly started saying that he should call out justin trudeau

00:00:40.480 and that he should stop you know supporting the liberal government and then you know

00:00:43.520 yelled some expletives too which i don't support but there's nothing in that interaction that that

00:00:48.880 sort of indicates that the guy's somehow homophobic or bigoted in any way but the ctv news's headline

00:00:54.080 was still singh confronts homophobic heckler at events in newfoundland and i read the article

00:00:59.760 nowhere in the article do they actually dispute that there was no reason to call the man homophobic

00:01:04.240 they just say that like singh said it and that he says that there's like a big problem

00:01:08.480 with bigotry or like sort of people disrespecting politicians and others these days it's so clownish

00:01:14.800 but it demonstrates that if you're an establishment left-wing politician the media just parts ways

00:01:20.640 for you they if the your narrative makes no sense they'll at least present your narrative the way

00:01:26.160 you said it with no pushback at all which is effectively trying to indicate that there's some

00:01:30.720 truthfulness behind it when there's no pushback neutral reporting is actually in a certain sense

00:01:36.560 a lie this is where i don't i do not appreciate the neutrality of the media at times there'll be an

00:01:42.800 obvious lie that justin trudeau or jagmeet singh or even back in the day when erin o'too was the leader of

00:01:47.680 the conservative party if they had said anything that was just objectively a lie they would print

00:01:51.600 what they said but there would be no follow-up or they would contact no person to be able to give

00:01:56.080 comment to be able to expose why what that person is saying is wrong so in that and when you're when

00:02:01.440 you do that all you're basically saying to the audience is you should probably just take their word

00:02:05.360 for it but like if if if pier polioff says anything like that other day where he said that that

00:02:10.080 one house out in ontario i believe or nova scotia was a shack and it was like this like this 500 square

00:02:16.720 foot house that was on the market for 550 000 and they hunted down the homeowner to basically say

00:02:22.080 that they felt insulted that they called their home a shack which is objectively a shack by the way

00:02:27.280 uh that they'll do that to pier polioff all day long any other conservative if you say something

00:02:31.440 that's even true but they can kind of find an angle where you were maybe slightly rude or maybe if you're

00:02:36.240 really squint and put your head to the side you can see how maybe they didn't say it in the most 100

00:02:41.760 accurate way possible the media does that all the time but jagmeet singh basically just pointed

00:02:46.480 to the guy and said that guy's homophobic and the media's like yeah he must be homophobic

00:02:50.080 but jagmeet singh said it and where and when has jagmeet singh ever been wrong but goodness if you're

00:02:56.240 ever looking for a an opportunity to realize just how bad the media is it's in these small little

00:03:02.000 stories like this the media doesn't even have any reason to lie they don't have any reason to not

00:03:06.720 bring up the fact that they don't know why he called the person homophobic but they do anyways

00:03:11.200 because the media is in the bag of the liberals and the mvp who are making sure to subsidize

00:03:16.080 their reporting

The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - August 02, 2023