The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - January 26, 2025


Pierre Poilievre will crush Mark Carney (Team Trudeau propping up Carney)


Episode Stats


Length

24 minutes

Words per minute

174.13893

Word count

4,279

Sentence count

326

Harmful content

Misogyny

16

sentences flagged

Hate speech

7

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Wyatt Claypool explains why Mark Carney is a weak horse in the Liberal leadership race, and why it's time for Chrystia Freeland to go all in on her chances of beating Pierre Polyev in the next election.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here. I know I'm a conservative, so maybe this doesn't mean much
00:00:06.060 coming from me, but the Liberal Party leadership race is remarkably boring, and especially Mark
00:00:12.920 Carney's campaign. This guy is supposed to be a political juggernaut, supposedly,
00:00:18.140 who can take on and beat Pierre Polyev in the 2025 federal election. I think if people study
00:00:24.780 the year 2025 in Canadian politics in the future, one of the major themes is going to be the skull
00:00:31.480 crushing levels of hubris inside the Liberal Party to think that Mark Carney or Chrystia Freeland
00:00:37.360 were good candidates. As I keep saying about them, these people are the personification of the color 1.00
00:00:43.640 beige. Nobody cares about them. There is nobody who is genuinely excited about Mark Carney. You will
00:00:50.740 sometimes see liberals accuse conservatives of only liking Pierre Polyev out of hatred for
00:00:55.660 Justin Trudeau, which I think is completely untrue. Polyev genuinely has a following of people who
00:01:00.860 really likes the way he thinks about politics, the way he talks, especially the way he deals with the
00:01:05.600 media. But in fact, Mark Carney is someone that people only like inside the Liberal Party because
00:01:11.520 of the sick fantasy that he is somehow going to be able to beat Pierre Polyev in the 2025 federal
00:01:17.660 election, despite the fact that whoever becomes the Liberal leader is going to be dragging the
00:01:23.080 disgusting baggage of the Liberal Party. So the thing I want to take you guys all through today
00:01:29.080 is Mark Carney's remarkably boring campaign. I want to show you some stuff directly from his campaign,
00:01:36.660 as well as other footage of Mark Carney throughout the over the years, because I think it's telling of
00:01:41.880 his actual skills as a politician. There's a good reason Mark Carney was not a politician until
00:01:47.440 this year because he sucks at it. He's not charismatic. In fact, Christia Freeland may be a far better
00:01:54.880 Liberal leader than Mark Carney could ever be. And Christia Freeland sucks. Did you see the video clip 1.00
00:02:00.260 the other day when reporters are surrounding her and she's like twitchy and nervous? You can tell that
00:02:05.420 she has some social anxiety and I feel bad for her. Like, obviously, I'd probably be like that with that
00:02:10.520 many reporters around me. But she is still better than Mark Carney, who makes me think of toast buttered
00:02:16.900 with margarine. Not even butter. He is not a butter man. Mark Carney is second rate on everything. I
00:02:22.880 bet his favorite movie is Grease 2 or Caddyshack 2. He is not somebody who is allowed to like original
00:02:30.040 films. He only likes crappy sequels. That is who Mark Carney is. But before I get into this chart of
00:02:36.160 endorsements, guys, remember to like this video, subscribe to the channel. I am putting my body,
00:02:40.560 mind, and soul on the line to cover this Liberal leadership race because it is prestigiously boring
00:02:45.340 and it is sucking my soul dry. Anyways, I'm being very hyperbolic there just for fun. But here are the
00:02:51.640 current endorsements. We have Mark Carney sitting at 38 endorsements from Liberal MPs. He's not really
00:02:58.480 even outpacing Christia Freeland by that much. She has 27 as well as the fact that she is an MP herself.
00:03:04.560 So naturally that has some weight in her local riding. Karina Gould has two endorsements plus 0.80
00:03:10.720 herself. And then Chandra Arya, Jamie Batsy both only have themselves as their own endorsements,
00:03:17.280 obviously. And then there's this Ruby Dahlia girl who's also jumped into the race. I heard that when 0.99
00:03:22.980 she was an MP between like 2004 and 2011, she had like the lowest ratings between on from parliamentary
00:03:30.280 staff as a person to work for, that I guess she was like a nightmare. She's like Amy Klobuchar throwing like 1.00
00:03:35.880 textbooks at people and eating salad with a comb because you forgot her fork. Like not, not, not exactly a
00:03:42.900 great, you know, person to be running for the leadership of a party that's currently dying. But if you're Mark Carney,
00:03:49.880 you're supposed to be the juggernaut of this campaign. You should be tripling Christia Freeland in terms of
00:03:56.140 endorsements. The thing I find most telling about the current endorsement map right now is not even
00:04:01.760 who has how many, you know, is, is, is Carney leading or is Freeland leading? Carney is really
00:04:08.200 not leading it by that much. I'd be embarrassed if I was him and I only had an 11 extra more endorsements
00:04:13.880 than Freeland considering he has all of team Trudeau behind them. Team Trudeau, Trudeau, Gerald Butts,
00:04:18.720 Katie Telford are like threatening MPs to endorse him and he still only has 11 more. The thing that's more
00:04:23.560 interesting is think about how many MPs have not endorsed anyone who are waiting to see what
00:04:28.880 happens because they know Mark Carney is probably a completely weak horse. He is a dying mule being
00:04:35.400 put into a horse race and everyone's saying, well, isn't he so exciting? He's not. Liberal party staffers
00:04:41.520 all day long can keep posting photos with him wearing sunglasses and saying he's brat. He's still
00:04:46.780 boring. He is nobody. And I'm going to keep repeating the word boring every time I talk with the liberal
00:04:52.160 leadership race because that's all you can say. This headline here, this story is remarkable and
00:04:58.700 it's not remarkable as some people think because it's so ridiculous. It's remarkable because it's
00:05:03.380 kind of true. Here is this story from National News Watch. Chrystia Freeland says she's running
00:05:09.140 against the Ottawa establishment in liberal leadership race. Freeland suggests Mark Carney is the top choice
00:05:15.100 of the prime minister's office. Guys, Chrystia Freeland is almost as establishment as you could
00:05:21.680 get in Canadian politics. She has been there the entire time in the Trudeau government. She has been
00:05:26.800 the deputy prime minister. She was the finance minister, which arguably is actually the real number
00:05:31.840 two role in government because you touch on every area of government from the ministry with the purse
00:05:38.600 strings. But she's right. She actually is the anti-establishment candidate of this leadership race
00:05:44.740 outside of our boy Chandra Arya, the man so based. He told a reporter when they asked him, do you know French?
00:05:51.700 No. And then just kept motoring on because you know what? Maybe we shouldn't have to know French to be
00:05:57.340 prime minister. He also only knows probably English three quarters of the way. But who cares? Chandra is a good
00:06:03.740 guy. He actually kind of is half a good guy. He actually pushes back against terror supporters and
00:06:09.520 Calistanis, which is natural because he's one of few Hindu Canadian politicians in politics who's actually 0.99
00:06:16.040 elected. But again, this is actually true. Freeland is the anti-establishment candidate because Mark
00:06:24.040 Carney is the Trudeau guy. He is literally Justin Trudeau's fourth term. Mark Carney has no support outside
00:06:30.660 the fact that Justin and Gerald Butts and Katie Telford are telling people to endorse him. And now I want to show
00:06:36.640 you some of these endorsements, too, because Mark Carney's entire campaign is just these really shallow
00:06:42.580 endorsements. This is Adam Van Coverden, who's like some sort of speed skater, kayaker. I don't know. He's some
00:06:49.220 Olympic athlete who's in politics now. This is his endorsement video of Mark Carney. And literally all the Mark Carney
00:06:55.740 videos from these MPs sound the exact same. There's a lot going on right now. And more than ever, Canada needs
00:07:02.540 leadership, a vision and the expertise necessary to deal with threats and bullies from our friends in
00:07:08.160 America and President Donald Trump. So that's why I'm endorsing my friend, Mark Carney to be the next
00:07:14.140 leader of the Liberal Party of Canada. I mean, oh, my goodness, don't show how short Mark Carney is. I don't
00:07:18.880 even think Adam is supposed to be very tall. And Mark Carney looks like he's like his five year old son
00:07:23.740 here. Next Prime Minister of Canada. Mark, you got this, man. All right, man. Thanks, Adam. That
00:07:27.880 means the world to me. I mean, being with a proven winner, someone who knows about teamwork. And this
00:07:33.460 is what it's about. We all got to come together as Liberals, as Canadians, build the strongest economy
00:07:39.200 that works for all Canadians, stand up for Canada against Donald Trump, get the best deal for Canada
00:07:44.380 and move forward. And, you know, there's no better day than today to let's go. Let's skate.
00:07:49.980 There's never a better thing to do.
00:07:53.740 That was just awkward and weird. By the way, isn't Adam Van Kovren from like a specific solo
00:07:59.660 sport? That's really funny if he is. And Mark Carney's like, of course, you know about winning
00:08:03.760 and teamwork. He doesn't actually he knows about winning, I guess, but technically solo. I think
00:08:08.540 he might have been in something where there's like two people in it. Maybe he was in canoeing or
00:08:13.500 whatever. I don't know. But all the videos are like this. I want to keep going. And here's a solo
00:08:18.840 video of Mark Carney. It's just 14 seconds. I hope I don't get absolutely destroyed by
00:08:23.620 by copyright because there's music in this clip. But this is their attempt to make him
00:08:29.580 interesting. Put on some hip music and editing. Just do a lot of fancy edits and maybe we can
00:08:35.920 suck some energy out of Mark Carney.
00:08:51.760 Is it could it be any clearer that there was not that many people in that room for
00:08:56.540 Mark Carney? The low angles, the really tight shots of him talking to like one person demonstrates
00:09:03.100 to me he is not holding big rallies. In fact, if you go to Freeland's page, she is actually
00:09:08.400 having far larger rooms than Mark Carney is because she's somebody that people recognize.
00:09:14.140 Look at any of the polling on name recognition. Nobody knows who Mark Carney is. Literally 26% of
00:09:19.640 people know who he is. That's a terrible, that is an awful, that's an awful record. Look at this
00:09:26.640 video from which this guy, a liberal commentator and organizer, Evan Scrimshaw says game set match IMO
00:09:36.660 because Anita Anand is endorsing Mark Carney, a lady who I was terrified of would be in the 0.96
00:09:44.020 race because I am, I refuse to talk about Anita Anand. I refuse. I signed a contract somewhere
00:09:53.780 saying I don't have to talk about Anita Anand. In fact, she blocked me for noting on Twitter. I didn't
00:09:59.860 even tag her, but I just noted she's the most boring person in Canadian politics who was potentially 1.00
00:10:04.720 going to run for leader. And she blocked me because of that, because she knows it's true.
00:10:08.740 Oh my goodness, it's even echoey. She couldn't even film this thing without an echo.
00:10:14.500 Take the time to think about what is best for our country, our party, and our beautiful town of Oldfield.
00:10:22.740 I've spoken with liberals, including the amazing supporters with me today, to discuss what is best
00:10:30.500 best at this time in Canada's history. And we agree that Mark Carney is the leader that Canada needs.
00:10:40.260 13% of that room knows who Mark Carney is, but you got them to stand here.
00:10:44.260 I worked with Mark during the global financial crisis almost 20 years ago, and I saw at that time
00:10:51.540 that Mark has the ability to steer Canada during very difficult times and to ensure that Canada
00:10:58.740 comes out on top. So join us in supporting Mark Carney for leader of the Liberal Party and Prime Minister
00:11:07.300 of Canada. Sign up at Liberal.ca. Apparently she couldn't even get the thing to not echo. There's
00:11:15.060 also only a few days left to even be able to vote in the Liberal leadership. So guys, Michael Clark
00:11:21.060 wasn't able to make it in the race, sadly. But if you want, because it's free, sign up to the Liberals
00:11:27.380 to go vote for Chandra Aria, and then maybe Frank Bayless, and then maybe that Ruby lady, 1.00
00:11:32.500 because she sounds like a psychopath, and I like that psychopath energy. Vote for any of those people, 0.97
00:11:37.220 and then maybe vote for Freeland, because at least she's not Mark Carney. Because Mark Carney is the...
00:11:42.260 Here's the thing. He's not just bland. He also has very destructive policies. They're hard to talk
00:11:48.660 about because they're so boring. But he's a big supporter of central bank digital currencies. In
00:11:53.540 fact, I actually... Me and the National Telegraph were the ones who got Pierre Polyev in the 22
00:11:58.500 leadership race to take his stance against CBDCs, which he actually made a major platform point of
00:12:04.180 his leadership, and he's carried it forward. And then even it worked into his stump speech. We were
00:12:09.060 some of the few people to actually get Polyev to change that stump speech. It's not like,
00:12:12.420 oh, he never changed it, and it's bland. But you know, it was a solid stump speech he would give,
00:12:17.460 and he would basically not change it because it was nearly perfect. But he did include our pitch
00:12:22.580 on why he should ban central bank digital currencies. So that was good. But all, everything that Mark
00:12:27.460 represents is like bureaucracy. I just think of Excel spreadsheets and like lists of regulations
00:12:34.340 whenever I think of Mark Carney. You don't think of any of these Liberals as like,
00:12:38.420 again, personalities, as like change makers. Mark Carney feels like somebody who wears small
00:12:45.140 glasses and looks at documents and makes edits. And he's never making edits to change, to remove
00:12:51.780 policies. He only ever adds. Here's another video that I thought was like, why would you even want
00:12:58.580 this guy to give you an endorsement? If you were wondering if he was being backed by Team Trudeau,
00:13:04.660 wonder no further. He got an endorsement from Seamus O'Regan. Now only now all he needs is the
00:13:10.100 endorsement of Mark Miller. And he basically has the entire Trudeau wedding troupe. Hey, everybody.
00:13:16.100 To paraphrase an old saying, history happens all of a sudden. And that certainly seems true over the 0.95
00:13:22.180 last. I'm not even sure if this is Mark Carney. Seamus O'Regan and him almost look identical in a certain
00:13:26.980 sense this month. Ukraine, the Middle East, Greenland, the 51st state, President Trump again.
00:13:39.300 You know, when I first started politics, and that seems about 50 years ago,
00:13:43.300 I made a promise to the people here that I would put the work first. That's why I'm not running for
00:13:48.100 reelection. That I wasn't here for the show. I was here to do the job. And to do any job well,
00:13:55.220 you need to be realistic about what needs to be done. You need to see things as they are,
00:14:00.660 not as you wish them to be.
00:14:04.500 That's hilarious to say because the wish casting behind Mark Carney's candidacy is insane. Even
00:14:10.420 Frank Graves and ECOS are putting out borderline fake polls to pretend the liberals have momentum
00:14:15.860 throughout this leadership. They don't. Even Frank knows they don't have momentum. He's having to
00:14:20.500 manipulate his data to pretend that the electorate the next election is going to be like 60%
00:14:25.220 graduates, like university graduates. That's never been the turnout in any election. Maybe 50%,
00:14:33.060 usually around 48%. You're not getting 55%, 60% university grads. But like, you know, we can't
00:14:40.740 just wish for something like whatever he said about wishing. It's like, dude, Mark Carney is literally a
00:14:46.100 wish cast candidate. He is a empty box. People are putting all their hopes and dreams into pretending he
00:14:51.300 represents. He represents nothing. Canadians want change. That's clear. And if we're being honest
00:14:58.980 with ourselves and with each other, that has probably been clear for a little while now.
00:15:04.340 So knowing that Canadians want change, we got two choices. We can rationalize it, or we could be
00:15:12.340 realistic about it. If we rationalize it, we'll go down the path of incrementalism. We will
00:15:18.100 continue to try to deliver what we think is best and hope that we can convince enough Canadians to see
00:15:24.340 things our way. If we're realistic about it, we'll deliver what they want. They want change.
00:15:32.820 They want fresh ideas. They want a new message. They want a new voice. Our choice as liberals is whether
00:15:41.780 we want to see that. I'm forgetting if he's even endorsing Mark Carney here. If he says Mark Carney is
00:15:46.980 the fresh new voice and he's change, I'm going to know. I'm quitting. I'm quitting. Metaphorically,
00:15:55.700 but I'm quitting. Our choice as liberals is whether we give Canadians a choice in that change. There are
00:16:03.540 hundreds of reasons why Mark Carney should be the next leader of the Liberal Party of Canada.
00:16:07.700 Mark Carney is not fresh. He's as fresh as a Fig Newton. Mark Carney makes me think of Werther's 0.97
00:16:14.660 originals and like sweaters with pockets on them. And our next prime minister. He is experienced on the
00:16:22.100 world stage. He is laser focused on the economy. This doesn't mean anything. I'm sorry, Seamus, but
00:16:28.580 you have you have taken up too much of my time. This is nothing. This is this is things where he's
00:16:34.500 sharing all these endorsements. Here's one that he actually did share. He did share that Seamus one, too.
00:16:38.980 I just only bookmarked specifically Seamus's post. We're saying thank you, Steve McKinnon. We're fortunate
00:16:44.980 to have you on our team. This guy is the one who competes with Mark Gerritsen on who can embarrass
00:16:49.540 themselves more like the makes the most ridiculous possible like act like attacks on the conservatives.
00:16:56.660 Steve McKinnon, Mark Gerritsen and like Mark Holland are some of the worst possible liberals. And I
00:17:02.180 believe they're all currently backing. I believe they're all currently backing Mark Carney. I think
00:17:07.780 Freeland might have gotten one of the three. I think she might have gotten Mark Hall and the guy
00:17:12.100 who thinks that the carbon tax is good because it prevents kids from going on boring family like road
00:17:17.380 trips. But the funny thing about all this was that Chandra Aria was actually the MP, the Liberal Party
00:17:26.660 leadership candidate who got his paperwork in first, who got the money in first. There is a chance this
00:17:33.220 man has been fundraising faster than Mark Carney and Freeland has because guess what? He's at least
00:17:40.660 somebody. He's not boring. Even Frank Bayless. I would give Frank Bayless. Frank Bayless has a
00:17:45.620 personality, not a very exciting person, but like you could have coffee with him and not be bored to
00:17:51.620 tears. That guy can also speak French and English and he's a business owner. They should probably make
00:17:55.940 that guy the leader if they're smart. But Chandra Aria legitimately has more excitement on social media. 0.87
00:18:02.340 It's ironic excitement. It's people like me calling him my boy because it's funny. But nobody is actually
00:18:09.700 online talking about Mark Carney as a personality, as an actual human being. I'm going to bring this
00:18:15.460 up quickly. This was Mark Carney at the WEF like a couple years ago in 2019. Some people think it's
00:18:22.900 this year. It was not this year. He's not there right now. He's obviously in Canada campaigning.
00:18:28.100 But this is a clip from Rebel News interviewing him as they walk and talk. Considering that this is
00:18:33.940 the way that he is dealing with hostile media, and although I like Rebel News obviously for a liberal,
00:18:38.980 they would be considered hostile media. Do you think that this guy is going to be able to beat
00:18:43.220 Pierre Polyev when he is confronted by hostile media? This is before he's even running for anything.
00:18:48.580 He has nothing to lose. He could say whatever he wants here. He could clown on Rebel News,
00:18:52.820 you know, be ironic, sarcastic, do anything. This is his only way of dealing with them asking him
00:18:58.340 questions. I do lots of media. Friendly media. No, I do. No, God, no. The ones that are here invited.
00:19:06.580 I'm doing no media at this point. Can we sit down and I'll make a time with you and
00:19:10.340 answer some actual tough questions? You can make a request for a meeting. So you can deny it.
00:19:16.740 They go over this. Maybe you guys should go look up the video. But I've seen Mark Carney talking to
00:19:24.260 hostile media. He sucks at it. He mostly just dismisses them. There's a reason that him and Freeland
00:19:30.340 both banned independent media that they did not vet from entering their leadership announcements
00:19:36.340 because they are so like slow on their feet. Again, Freeland, the lady who's twitching around, 0.99
00:19:43.460 she brings more energy to the table than Mark Carney does. It's actually incredible. Can I get the video
00:19:55.380 here? I'm trying to find the twitchy video of Christy Freeland. I don't need to do this. I know
00:20:04.100 this is wasting a little bit of time, but like she genuinely like I can't find it here by looking at
00:20:08.980 twitchy. It doesn't matter. You guys have all seen the tape of her like actually shaking as she's 0.99
00:20:13.140 talking to media. More charismatic, legitimately more charismatic. She's an actual anti-establishment 0.94
00:20:19.540 candidate because Mark Carney is being propped up so hard by Trudeau. They're papering over all of
00:20:24.900 his flaws. If he becomes the new leader and prime minister, and by the way, thanks Doug Ford, but
00:20:30.420 there's not going to be an election probably until October because Doug Ford by having a provincial
00:20:34.820 election a year and a half early has just given Singh, Jagme Singh and the NDB, the perfect excuse to say,
00:20:40.740 oh, there's voter fatigue right now in October. We need, or in Ontario, we need to wait a few more
00:20:45.540 months for this election. He's given for like Jagmeet a great excuse to wait, but regardless of when the
00:20:52.100 election happens, the liberals by putting so much artificial energy into Carney by the Trudeau camp,
00:20:59.220 like, you know, having all of his rough exterior, his very difficult to kind of listen to
00:21:07.620 manner. He's boring. He makes me think of Niles Crane when he's talking, but not in the fun way
00:21:14.660 that he's going to, they're going to have him get on stage with Polyev and he's going to get crushed
00:21:19.700 and they're going to wonder what happened. This feels like the 2016 Democratic primary between Hillary 0.99
00:21:25.780 Clinton and Bernie Sanders. Oddly enough, Bernie Sanders is Chrystia Freeland, but Mark Carney is
00:21:31.700 Hillary Clinton. He should be putting away Chrystia Freeland and his other competitors 1.00
00:21:36.580 really quickly here, and he's not. That was the big flaw in Hillary's campaign. Bernie Sanders is a
00:21:42.260 terrible presidential candidate and she took until like the very end to finally beat him. That 1.00
00:21:47.620 demonstrated that she did not have a lot of momentum. She did not have real love in the electorate.
00:21:53.540 That's what's going to happen. Freeland is going to barely lose to Carney. Maybe she even wins and
00:21:58.580 then we're in a completely different timeline. But if Carney barely wins, they'll pretend that
00:22:03.460 oh, it was a hard fought battle. She was a tough competitor. She is not. She is a bad candidate too, 1.00
00:22:08.580 but she's a bad candidate with even less support than he does behind the scenes from the Trudeau people.
00:22:13.460 She is like Arif Farhani endorsing her. That's like one of the few ministers endorsing her. Ahmed Hussein,
00:22:19.380 horrible endorsements. But she is going to almost win and they're not going to realize that, wow,
00:22:25.860 that's bad that Mark Carney couldn't beat Twitchy. That's a bit of a problem. Mark Carney has
00:22:33.940 literally nowhere to grow. Again, the Liberal government's approval rating is only two points
00:22:38.100 higher than Trudeau's approval rating. He's at 21%. They're at 23. Do you think Mark Carney then opens up
00:22:44.900 another 20% of accessible voters who might vote Liberal? That's how many more voters,
00:22:51.220 there's a difference between your actual support and your accessible voters. I've seen Nanos' power
00:22:57.300 ratings on this and it's an interesting way of looking at it. It doesn't even mean people are
00:23:02.020 voting for you, but who is your vote accessible voter pool? The accessible voter pool for the Conservatives
00:23:07.620 right now is like almost two thirds of Canadians. The accessible voter pool for the Liberals right now is
00:23:13.460 like 40%. And that doesn't mean you're getting all those people. That just means somebody who might
00:23:18.740 even consider voting for you. They're going to try and beat Polyev with like a full third of people
00:23:26.100 less, even considering voting for them. And when you're that far behind and being considered,
00:23:30.980 you're not winning. You're not going to somehow convince all the people on the fence to suddenly
00:23:35.300 jump on your side. Polyev doesn't even need the voters on the fence. He already has enough people
00:23:40.180 solidly in his camp voting for him that he can pull this thing off. Anyways, so that should be it
00:23:46.740 for me today, guys. One quick plug. If you live in Ontario, I would have you consider voting for
00:23:53.140 the new blue party of Ontario in this provincial election. Doug Ford's PCs are literally indistinguishable
00:23:59.780 from the Liberals in Ontario. Doug Ford and Bonnie Crombie and Trudeau could not be picked out of a
00:24:06.180 lineup in terms of their policy. So I don't want you to just consider voting for the new blue party.
00:24:11.860 Consider running for them. I'm going to link their website down in the description below,
00:24:15.620 as well as pinned at the top of the comments. But other than that, guys, make sure to like this video,
00:24:20.260 subscribe to the channel. Trying to get to 100,000 subscribers by mid-December. And other than that,
00:24:26.660 see you guys later.