00:10:50.600Notice how it says, I don't know whether this is deliberate,
00:10:54.240just left-wing terrorist attacks, whereas they say the violent far-right.
00:10:58.240there's a little bit of an imbalance there but it's interesting that they have to qualify it as
00:11:02.980violent which implies that it isn't always violent so that's also another thing again they're holding
00:11:08.940on to that um definition of coercion despite its decline this year right-wing terrorism could
00:11:14.860easily return to previous high levels and it's important for both sides to resource counter
00:11:19.600terrorism efforts against both and work with communities to gain their support against
00:11:23.740extremist and it says here that it hasn't reached the 60s and 70s level of urgency but for the first
00:11:34.000time in 30 years it it surpassed this sort of extremist right i'll call it extremist right
00:11:40.280i think far right is a completely nonsensical term i'll interpret it as extremist right
00:11:45.940but even then you have to use the language they're using right well i mean i do think that
00:11:51.100the concept of extremism is an interesting concept despite the fact that it can be misused and yeah
00:11:58.660right and they're saying that our analysis of terrorism trends in the u.s shows that indeed
00:12:04.300left-wing violence has risen in the last 10 years and they try to say that this is in response to
00:12:10.020trump but uh the and in response to this but it seems like you know the trend is upward it's like
00:12:19.780saying it's in response to trump is like saying school shootings happen because there are lots
00:12:24.400of annoying kids like that's the wrong way around right you're you're adding onus on the people
00:12:29.460that are being targeted by the violence which is the wrong way to frame it i think i don't think
00:12:34.420that they are trying to be necessarily partisan here but yeah you could definitely say that the
00:12:42.160way that they are doing it they are expressing themselves could be more pro left-wing in some
00:12:49.360respects could be interpreted as as doing this i don't know whether it's deliberate or not right
00:12:53.940so here we have marco rubio's statement about the recent attempts that have intensified and they
00:13:00.580have targeted several organizations and predominantly one that is goes by the name
00:13:08.520ai collective in italy so he says far left terrorism poses a profound threat to the united
00:13:15.560states and the broader west today the united states sanctioned several transnational far
00:13:21.460left terrorist networks including the ai collective what is that ai yeah that's the guy
00:13:28.560it's autistici inventati a major far left tech collective whose services are used by the most
00:13:35.320active and violent antifa cells in the us and across the world and he says that they are not
00:13:40.860going to allow it and are going to intensify their attempts to do something about it here we have
00:13:49.000this article that was published in on fox news by peter dabroska he says state department reveals
00:13:55.960potential link no he says it reveals portland antifa connection to hamas iran's irgc in sweeping
00:14:03.340terror action so essentially what happened was that according to the u.s department of state
00:14:09.580The AI collective in Italy, that is Italy-based, was providing several far-left terrorist organizations and also terrorist organizations like Hamas and the IRGC with the digital infrastructure to coordinate and to engage in all sorts of actions that have the aim to disrupt and terrorize.
00:14:35.280Is that on US soil or is that interventionist?
00:14:39.580as in um related to their foreign policy um it's both disrupting intelligence for example
00:14:45.340i think it's both it's international and the idea is that this goes to um say that we live
00:14:53.200in an era where the adversaries although the world is so interconnected and the western world
00:14:59.760is targeted by people and adversaries who are internationally organized and they operate in
00:15:06.280And the vested interest in, you could say, anti-American causes has become, you could say, politically or has enough political purchase to qualify as a national security threat in the United States.
00:15:18.340And that's the basis that they're clamping down on it.
00:15:20.340Definitely, because it isn't just an issue of them having the same far-left rhetoric that Hassan Piker has, for instance.
00:15:28.320It's an issue of them providing tools that are encrypted and are routinely used against, let's say, ICE agents.
00:15:38.080So, for instance, I'll show you this here.
00:15:40.940There was an anti-ICE agitator who doxxed ICE officers in North Carolina.
00:15:46.160Of course, there was also that ICE agent tracker as well.
00:15:49.300I'm not sure if that was related to this, but it shows that there is at least a willingness within the United States for these forms of technology and going after the people that provide them is a way of stopping it.
00:16:01.800Exactly. And let's say also that when it comes to the anti-IS rhetoric of the radical left, which is often, as I showed you when I showed you, AOC is adopted by the less radical leftists, if you'd like, is having real life consequences.
00:16:20.960Because when they are saying these people are Nazis and Nazis are fair game, you can do anything to them, and they dox their families, well, that's an invitation to do something bad.
00:16:36.180Let's not hide behind our fingers here.
00:16:40.900Right, so let me tell you in a nutshell what this involves as far as the AI collective is called, that they have denied.
00:16:48.180They said essentially that they are just anti-capitalists and anti-fascists and that this isn't terrorist.
00:16:55.120So what happens, that's the first stage, is that there are sanctions and financial blocking.
00:17:01.020The designation freezes all assets of the AI collective subject to U.S. jurisdiction
00:17:06.340and strictly prohibits U.S. citizens, businesses, and financial institutions from conducting transactions or providing services to the collective.
00:17:15.360then there's the connection to portland antifa and there's a memo by the state department that
00:17:21.520explicitly names rose city antifa as one of the primary u.s groups utilizing the ai collectives
00:17:28.740encrypted email web hosting and anonymity tools and then there's the forest terrorist overlap
00:17:34.360because there are heavy there there is it's it's not a weird inference to draw that if this ai
00:17:41.740Collective is providing them with a digital infrastructure that they provide Hamas and
00:17:49.720the IRGC with, and their rhetoric is almost always overlapping, that they function as
00:19:36.680I mean, just giving our enemies, or say our, the US's enemies, something to think about on that front can go a long way.
00:19:43.000But it can only go as far as that if you enforce it.
00:19:46.600Well, I mean, just making them feel small and isolated and as if their action can't do anything is enough to keep them home, right?
00:19:53.400i think enough people on the right have felt that feeling to know that a feeling of hopelessness
00:19:58.400makes you uh sort of uh resistant to doing things yes demoralized yeah but one thing to say here
00:20:06.100which i think that it's a very huge positive here it isn't just a positive for the u.s i think it's
00:20:11.200generally speaking positive for the entire world but when it comes to cracking down on networks
00:20:17.420I think several different agencies of different states and different transnational organizations such as the EU, they need to collaborate.
00:20:26.520So, for instance, if you check documentaries about serial killers, often they got away with what they were doing because the police departments of different states weren't coordinating.
00:40:52.260There's no precedent in this in Canadian law, as far as I'm aware, that you can just bar people from associating based on what.
00:41:00.020When there's literally no history of them being disruptive at all, just discussing politics.
00:41:05.180It's also worth mentioning that Canada has very severe hate speech laws and they are very subjective. They're deliberately creating an atmosphere where everyone is guilty by default and the state allows you to get away with it, chooses how long they're going to allow you to get away with it.
00:41:24.580It's the same thing that the Chinese Communist Party does where they make the legal arrangements so difficult to not break that when you do something wrong politically, they can always have something to get you on rather than looking like they're purely persecuting you for politics.0.81
00:42:08.360And it's also interesting that when asked who made the decision to go after the conference,
00:42:14.040he said it was a group decision, but when he was pressed on whether those orders were passed down,
00:42:19.080the chain of command he refused to answer and hung up the phone which seems to suggest probably yes
00:42:24.220probably wanted to avoid but um the full call here is six minutes long so i'm not going to play it but
00:42:29.740all of the links in this that i haven't played uh you can access on our website under the podcast
00:42:34.800section we list them underneath the video if you want to uh have a full listen to the things i'm
00:42:40.540going over but for the sake of time i'm not going to play at all um also it's worth pointing out
00:42:45.300The police in Canada, particularly Hamilton police as depicted here, go into places of worship and they're taken for tours of all these foreign religions as part of their diversity training.
00:43:01.940And there they are all with their Sikh headdresses on in a Sikh temple.
00:43:08.640That multiculturalism. They are supposed to keep their culture, but the police isn't.
01:19:20.520but academia placed him in such a position.
01:19:25.040And yeah, they failed the education system.
01:19:28.880They failed other researchers who went after the same job.
01:19:32.880They failed the students because I will agree with you.
01:19:36.180And fundamentally, I think that essentially, what happens here is that we have the metaphysics of inclusivity, as you mentioned, that focus on representation far more than they do on merit. And this is letting everyone down, because it says, well, if you're a black student, you will go to the class and you'll see a black professor and you'll feel good. Fine.0.96
01:20:03.660you may feel elated or enthusiastic but this enthusiasm is going to die down in two hours
01:20:10.320max but meanwhile you are being given this while a better education is taken away from you yes
01:20:19.920which damages your actual potential for getting ahead and that's without going into the moral
01:20:26.160crime that is inflicted on the underrepresented as in the people who they're literally trying to
01:20:31.960remove from sight they talk about for example this representation as being important but they
01:20:37.660then don't want to apply how for example when you adjust a an institution or a structure so as to
01:20:44.280have less of one types of people what effect that's going to have they won't allow these
01:20:48.940questions to be had why i think it's yeah but you have to it's in the interests of sociology and
01:20:55.480critical theory to ask these questions god forbid it's even in service of social progress to ask
01:21:01.760those questions why will you not have it but also you could say that i don't care about sociology
01:21:06.820and i don't care about the state of critical theory i care about society and this is bad
01:21:12.160for society turning our backs on meritocracy is bad it it leads to the very idea that a job has
01:21:20.980to get done fly under the radar and all focus is placed on who gets the job competence has got to
01:21:27.520be the metric that's got to be the deciding factor i accept that some believe that you we have to do
01:21:33.360more by the way of positive action to make sure that opportunity is available to all people i
01:21:37.880don't believe that that's not my view but it's a position i respect i just don't agree with it
01:21:42.340but to say to completely absolve any of the academics or the people who appointed him as
01:21:48.280not culpable and to blame the so-called murdoch empire or the people rightfully holding him to
01:21:53.360account is almost a as is immoral beyond measure yeah they're very they definitely have some yeah
01:22:01.280get honestly give up the grift now because literally someone has sorry no no just i'm just
01:22:08.940very angry i i like the passion yeah no honestly it does make me angry yeah and if it were the my
01:22:15.080first time of presenting this i'd be i'd be i'd be i'd be angry as well so no i i agree with you
01:22:21.600that there is there is a culpability here from on behalf of the academics and they're trying to say
01:22:27.360now well it's the bad people who criticized him who are to blame poor little him psychological
01:22:33.360harm he couldn't stand the criticism but it's all okay with us placing him in a public facing
01:22:38.640position yeah thank you very much yes no you're welcome let's move to the comment that's a random
01:22:46.560name thank you very much for your posts today but i will try to read before because you just said
01:22:52.660you're a fed poster that one's not though yeah okay may i point you to my first comment about
01:22:57.880agency it's all about agency fictages says dude jason lied about a pig's head and being threatened
01:23:04.800after investigation there was nothing no one encouraged jason to do those lies this is true
01:23:10.240he did say that a that a pig head was brought on his uh bed had he recently watched um the godfather
01:23:20.460with the horse yeah yeah but the point is that he told the police and he told them also the butcher
01:23:26.620from which the pig was allegedly stolen how could i mean you know you might be a good academic but
01:23:33.520how can you tell where the pig's head has come from okay okay um and so no one encouraged jason
01:23:39.880to uh to lie and uh underneath let's uh here we've discovered the that's random name uh we've
01:23:49.540discovered our enemy's weakness there is at um and he says that the loss of is at uh shot him
01:23:56.460literally and again fallen fireboard will say that stelis is wrong about who shola considers an enemy0.76
01:24:03.500she doesn't mean anything academic she means white people who she racially hates our days one less
01:24:09.660and he says that he isn't particularly sympathetic with our day right let's go to the to the0.50
01:24:16.700the videos hello lotus eaters uh today's monday i'm enjoying you watching you live um i'm going
01:24:26.320to be enjoying my uh final two days of freedom uh before my sensing date on this wednesday
01:24:31.920all this for tweets um yeah i'm going to be spending at least 14 months in jail for tweets
01:24:37.140but uh i've got you to look forward to with my uh white monster uh can i've never tried this
01:24:43.760before but i've heard it's all the mimic rage online and some some fried chicken so there's
01:24:49.620that let's go to the next one so just to steal man the foreign policy of nato regarding the
01:24:59.000Ukraine war is that it kind of makes sense that they would want to get Russia embroiled
01:25:03.280in an existential war can't pull out of, because it gives NATO a free hand to act against
01:25:08.600the allies of Russia, and honestly, the Russian sphere has been decimated during these last0.78
01:25:14.480few years, it's just that NATO has become so dysgenic in its industry and expertise
01:25:19.720that they simply lack the skill to actually pull any of these operations off to their
01:25:24.540completion, hence why the Iran war is a complete failure.
01:25:29.000NATO's not involved in the Iran war, is it?
01:25:32.320Yeah, and I also think that it would take about five years of increased funding
01:25:40.620of many of the other NATO countries for them to turn things around.
01:25:46.020And in fact, there's a lot of military technology being developed
01:25:49.460in both Europe and North America that is cutting edge