00:17:16.520Carney Flub's question asked in French about French language debate.
00:17:23.140Carney tripped over his Montfrancois and accidentally confirmed he would participate in a $75,000 private French language debate with other federal leaders.
00:17:35.400The public federal leaders' debates have been scheduled for April 16th and 17th
00:18:11.540Maxime Bernier of the PPC, who's striving to get his party's numbers up so he can join the two public debates,
00:18:17.540and we'll show you what he's doing to campaign in the next few minutes.
00:18:21.380He told the Western Standard he will also debate on TBA.
00:18:25.520According to the Crown broadcaster, Tory leader Pierre Polyev on Monday in French provoked Carney to debate him on stage at the private debate.
00:18:32.580If he thinks the Liberals should have a fourth term after the lost Liberal decade, he should say yes.
00:32:36.700And it's out there in the public for everybody to see.
00:32:39.260And let's not forget about his complete zealotry over the climate and what he's been doing in that regard for the past six or seven years.
00:32:52.520Here's Kevin O'Leary talking about Mark Carney.
00:32:57.860He was on with Candace Malcolm from Juneau News earlier today.
00:33:02.560The Premier's comments. I take note of her alignment of Monsieur Poitiers with Mr. Trump and would note that that's one of the decisions that Canadians will have to make, whether they want a government that is unifying, standing up for Canada and is taking focused action to build a better economy, or they want division.
00:33:32.560uh... and americanism uh... and that's what uh... mister polyeth seems to be
00:48:54.980But then again, these are the same people who go out and burn and firebomb Tesla dealerships and cars and key these cars and parking lots and whatnot.
00:49:04.680When a year ago they were saying, you should go out and buy a Tesla, man.
00:49:07.840They're really good for the environment.
00:49:13.000right oh one more thing about mark carney here let me throw this up on the screen
00:49:17.600you know that the liberals have been letting in millions and millions and millions of people
00:49:23.780into canada for the past four years yeah through the century initiative mark carney just hired an
00:49:28.660executive from the world economic forum blackrock and the century initiative is one of his main
00:49:34.240advisors do you think islamophobia is a problem in this country or anti-semitism i think anti-semitism
00:49:42.980more so these past couple of years but you know aside from what's been happening after october 7th
00:49:51.300we hadn't really aside from the in my opinion funded eco-terrorists and funded race rage people
00:50:02.180by and large in canadian society there's not really any kind of major problem
00:50:06.980i don't know i mean it just never occurred to me until they
00:50:13.040actually brought it to our attention that there is a problem at all
00:50:16.420so mark carney puts this tweet out today and some of the i'm not going to read all of the
00:50:23.360responses but some of them are absolutely hilarious if you guys are on x you should
00:50:27.100take the time to go and check this out this type of violence is not an isolated incident charges
00:50:32.440Let me read you the headline first from the CBC.
00:50:36.340Charges laid after police say hijab-wearing woman was attacked in Ajax, Ontario, library.
00:50:41.640Now this, according to most of the commenters, had nothing to do with Islamophobia,
00:50:46.320which is, in my opinion, a made-up word from white liberals and Muslims.0.78
00:50:54.800This type of violence is not an isolated incident.1.00
01:01:26.560Here's a story from Tamara Ugolini of Rebel News.
01:01:30.020This class action lawsuit has been initiated against once outspoken COVID critic lawyer Rocco Gulati, his associated entities and his constitutional rights center, which I will refer to as the Gulati defendants.
01:01:41.460The lawsuit alleges negligent misrepresentation, including pleading so poorly drafted they never had a chance of being heard on the merits.
01:01:48.960The bulk of this class action lawsuit centers on Gulati's instruction to unionized members who were being ousted from their workplaces and effectively denied their ability to earn income due to COVID-19 related measures such as vaccine mandates.
01:02:04.360And it's being said that Gulati advised them not to communicate or cooperate with their unions to file things like grievances.
01:02:12.320In addition to that, Gulati reportedly advised his clients not to discuss their cases with other lawyers.
01:02:18.960And as outlined in previous decisions and according to the statement of claim, these actions resulted in some of these former clients being forced to pay up to $200,000 in court costs.
01:02:30.520The parties in this class action each gave Gulati at least $1,000 and upwards of $3,500 in the case of once ousted Toronto paramedic Scarlett Martin, who, as the mother of four, had previously been awarded the exemplary service medal when she reached her 20th anniversary on the job.
01:02:50.140The broader class in the lawsuit is described as anyone who made payment to the Galati defendants or to the Constitutional Rights Centre to initiate COVID-19 litigation between March 1st, 2020 and present.
01:03:02.140This is further broken down into six legal cases brought forward by Galati and or the Constitutional Rights Centre, referred to as the 2020 Ontario Action, 2021 Ontario Action, 2022 Ontario Action, 2023 Ontario Action, the British Columbia Action and the Federal Court Action.
01:03:20.140The case against Galati's actions explains that following the unprecedented state of
01:03:24.660emergency in March of 2020, Galati began representing himself as a constitutional
01:03:28.980expert and solicited donations through various fundraising campaigns to bring legal challenges
01:03:34.400to COVID-19 government measures, which is alleged to have totaled into the multi-millions.
01:03:39.660While people were losing their businesses and their livelihoods, Galati was making bank.
01:03:44.820It's outlined that the Galati defendants and the CRC promised to seek injunctions,
01:03:49.420declarations of invalidity and constitutional challenges to government COVID-19 measures that
01:03:55.040would affect the rights of the general public, and that each of them had received in excess of
01:03:59.480a million dollars to do so. The general theme of each action centres on an alleged pattern
01:04:05.640of ambitious but poorly executed challenges to government-imposed COVID-19 measures
01:04:11.140across multiple court jurisdictions. These lawsuits were brought on behalf of diverse
01:04:15.780plaintiffs ranging from individuals and health care workers to municipal employees seeking
01:04:20.600declarations and injunctive relief against policies like vaccine mandates and masking
01:04:25.980requirements. Funded partly through public donations to the CRC and flat fee retainers,
01:04:31.680these cases consistently featured lengthy argumentative pleadings that were said to
01:04:36.340have advanced pseudo-legal theories that had no reasonable chance of being heard by the courts on
01:04:42.600the merits and violated various procedural rules leading to repeated dismissals or strikes by
01:04:48.480courts for being prolix or bad beyond argument. A big part of these actions relates to similarly
01:04:54.360worded claims being reused by Gulati even after others had been dismissed in other courts such as
01:05:01.200the 2023 Ontario action which was deemed bad beyond argument two weeks before the closely
01:05:08.120mirrored federal action claim was brought forth showing Gulati ought to have known that the claim
01:05:13.660was doomed to fail. The 2022 BC action was deemed bad beyond argument as well with the appeal being
01:05:20.040denied based on there being no reviewable error described and for again being prolix with a 391
01:05:26.300page long notice of civil claim. The federal action was similarly deemed bad beyond argument for
01:05:31.420mostly the same reasons outlined in the 2022 BC action but granted plaintiffs outside of the
01:05:37.720federal sector the ability to amend their claim. Instead of doing that, Galati filed an appeal
01:05:42.300of that decision, which ultimately found no reviewable error in the decision. But the judge
01:05:47.000did grant leave to amend to all plaintiffs should they wish to adjust the claim. I guess that's at
01:05:51.800their own expense. The 2024 Ontario action further found lack of jurisdiction, abusive process,
01:05:57.600no reasonable cause of action, and properly naming private citizens in a charter argument,
01:06:02.540which lacks jurisdiction, etc. The Galati defendants are further criticized in the
01:06:06.900statement of claim for inadequate client communication and advising unionized plaintiffs
01:06:11.660against working with their unions, which the Galati defendants should have known and in fact
01:06:16.540knew after that first decision that unionized employees have to at least initiate the grievance
01:06:21.620process through their union as their only legal avenue for employment disputes against their
01:06:27.320employer and prioritizing ideological pursuits over client interests, often leaving plaintiffs
01:06:32.860liable for substantial costs and with little progress in their cases you know i i have to uh
01:06:39.020stop for just a second on this i recall a couple three years ago people messaging me union members
01:06:47.180who refused to get the jibby jab there saying well what should i do my lawyer and it was rocco
01:06:54.220says i shouldn't try to go through the union and make a complaint here and i said well that's even
01:07:00.780I knew that by law, that's your only legal recourse as a member of a union to do that.
01:07:07.640Unless your union says no to you and laughs you out of the building.
01:07:12.440And that's what Rocco was telling these people.
01:07:15.160Don't mention this to your union representatives.
01:07:19.660He should have known that was the wrong advice.
01:07:28.280when he was a celebrated a celebrated figure in the movement just a couple three years ago
01:07:37.200this is a hard pill to swallow man as exemplified by stalled injunction efforts and a tendency to
01:07:43.040appeal rather than amend flawed pleadings at the judge's request for the breach of contract claim
01:07:48.800it was an expressed or implied term that the glotti defendants would do all things necessary
01:07:54.140or reasonable to protect or advance their clients' interests, draft pleadings in accordance with the
01:07:59.680applicable rules of the court, draft claims grounded in law, have reasonable knowledge of
01:08:04.640applicable or relevant law, follow basic civil procedural rules, name correct parties, and amend
01:08:11.160pleadings rather than appeal the orders striking the pleadings with leave to amend, which is much
01:08:15.940costlier, and do things like provide legal advice to the various risks of litigation. While none of
01:08:21.360these allegations have been proven in court as of yet, it is assumed that the competent legal team
01:08:27.360would likely have sufficient evidence to substantiate their statement of claim. Now,
01:08:32.880the plaintiffs are seeking a range of remedies, including an accounting and disgorgement of all
01:08:38.700revenue earned by the Gladi defendants from drafting pleadings and pursuing appeals in
01:08:44.680these various actions. They also claim general damages estimated at $4 million, special damages
01:08:51.320at $1 million and aggravated or punitive damages at another $1 million, with all amounts subject
01:08:57.860to proof at trial. When Gulati was contacted for his comment on the filings against him,
01:09:03.880his counsel responded that he intends to defend against this baseless claim. Mr. Gulati and
01:09:09.560Rocco Gulati Law Firm Professional Corporation are represented by Ken Fitz at McLennan Ross,
01:09:15.040whereas the Constitutional Rights Center, Inc. is represented by Joe Spellsey at Duncan Craig LLP.
01:09:22.740Although Gulati has attempted to sue those who criticized his legal actions previously,
01:09:27.120the courts dismissed his 2024 case under anti-SLAPP legislation and ordered him to pay $132,000 in costs.
01:09:34.680Gulati's former client, Dr. Kelvin Darkill, is suing him for $2 million, and Canuck Law has the receipts.
01:09:40.220Damages include professional negligence, breach of fiduciary duty and or breach of contract, pain, suffering, loss of reputation, as well as aggravated and or punitive damages.
01:09:50.940Another former client, Dr. Ashvinder Lamba, is suing for similar damages in the amount of $600,000.
01:09:57.740Now, this particular class action suit could very well lay bare an alleged betrayal of trust, masquerading as a crusade for justice,0.84
01:10:06.000that lured desperate Canadians, mothers like Scarlett Martin,
01:10:09.780healthcare workers and municipal employees into a legal abyss
01:10:13.260with promises of bold challenges to COVID-19 measures that never came to fruition
01:10:18.160despite amassing millions through retainers and public donations.
01:10:22.640Though the claim advances things like negligence,
01:10:25.080many are left overall feeling exploited during a time of crisis