00:06:16.860You know, I'll tell you, the reason I ask, guys, is simply because I haven't been able to find anybody here in Manitoba who has been willing to take a case on like this or even come on the show and talk about it.
00:06:27.180And I've got several viewers who are worried because they're being threatened by their workplaces, by their employer, that they're going to lose their jobs if they don't get double jabbed by a certain date.
00:06:39.180And that data is fast approaching. And we're not talking about just federal employees or even federally regulated employees.
00:06:44.040We're talking about people who work for private firms and they're terrified.
00:06:48.280I mean, we're talking about people who have been at a place for 25 years.
00:06:51.620This is their their sole stream of income for the household.
00:06:55.480So this is what's paying their mortgage. This is what's putting food on the table.
00:06:59.260And yet, for some reason, it seems like Manitoba lawyers are completely and totally MIA in this situation,
00:07:06.240except for one guy not in Winnipeg but he is he is now starting to try and amass
00:07:11.640from what I hear some kind of a class action lawsuit I don't know exactly what he's aiming
00:07:18.860at because there's so many different statutes and laws that are being broken in my opinion but
00:07:22.640let's start off with this question here we had a huge protest like many other cities in Canada did
00:07:28.640yesterday all worldwide as a matter of fact it was the worldwide walkout and so I'm going to say
00:07:34.000About a thousand people showed up in front of the health sciences center downtown here yesterday.
00:07:38.380We stayed peacefully for a couple of hours.
00:07:40.680We marched from one side of the street down the street and back up the adjoining street.
00:07:53.100Now, what you got from the other side, including the left wing corporate media, was a wild anti-vaxxing racist crowd gathers in front of hospitals.
00:08:04.000blocking uh ambulance access to the right so that's what it came off like and there was a
00:08:09.360bunch of arguments between what i call the branch covidians and our side of things the critical
00:08:14.660thinkers and the argument they're using is as we say discrimination we talk about this vaccine
00:08:20.820passport that's coming in tomorrow uh we're saying well you're discriminating clearly discriminating
00:08:25.660against people you're dividing society into two different groups and they say well it's just an
00:08:30.180inconvenience. If you can't take a little inconvenience, then you're just an
00:08:34.160entitled pig. Seriously, that is a tweet that I got today. I'm not even shitting0.99
00:08:38.140you about that. So what is the definition,
00:08:42.200the legal definition, we'll start with you, Nicholas, of discrimination?
00:14:38.280We have to be able to report bad things that people are saying and that, you know, because
00:14:42.940they can quote what people are saying to report.
00:14:46.720I mean, you know, they report on all kinds of horrible things that people say and do
00:14:50.020and they would say well that doesn't mean that we agree with it now the way they did it was highly
00:14:54.280provocative and i think although in a court of law they'd probably be able to they'd be able
00:14:58.580to weasel out of it i mean everyone knows what they were trying to do i mean yeah there's no doubt
00:15:03.020let's talk about coercion you guys uh there's been a lot of talk about well it's your choice
00:15:08.760this is what the other side says as well it's your choice and if you choose this then there's
00:15:14.720to be consequences and and we say well no that's coercion then i mean and that that by any legal
00:15:21.440standard should not be allowed but yet that's what's going on i mean you were being coerced
00:15:26.480with the loss of job you were being coerced with uh possible huge lottery winnings you're being
00:15:32.720coerced with ice cream i mean there you know you're being enticed you're being like explain
00:15:38.640coercion is is this what's going on here nicholas yeah i think it is now the lotteries and the ice
00:15:46.300cream i think that's that's not coercion that's persuasion or bribery the coercion comes into
00:15:52.440where as you say there will be consequences if you don't do this we will do this to you i mean
00:15:58.520that that's classic coercion bending someone else's will to your will through a threat of force
00:16:05.680and and I would say that threatening to take someone's job away threatening to take things
00:16:11.080that they love away from them I mean you know I've heard from a number of young people who
00:16:16.400they love hockey they've been working hard playing hockey they have a chance to be drafted
00:16:21.460into uh you know I spoke to one young person who was drafted into the QMJHL another person who was
00:16:28.240drafted into another league and and you have young people and I would say young people are more
00:16:33.860vulnerable than a hardened like I mean a guy like me I've been through life I can probably
00:16:38.240take a bit more than a young 17 year old who's finally achieved his dream and now he's being
00:16:45.140told no you didn't take this medical procedure we're gonna you so if to achieve your dream you
00:16:50.740have to do this I mean that's coercion of a even worse form because it's being used on on young
00:16:56.940people and I had one young person actually said you know I'm I'm debating like even you know if
00:17:03.200my choice is to never play hockey again but live 50 years or if my or play hockey but I die in two
00:17:09.920years I think I might go with dying in two years and and and so I can play hockey I mean tell me
00:17:16.240that's not coercion if someone's being making that choice I'm not saying that the vaccine is
00:17:21.280definitely going to kill someone or even probably kill someone in two years but I mean that's the
00:17:24.880calculus that's that's going through as much through these young people's minds yeah Derek
00:17:29.900well so i had a young woman said to me a few days ago when her employer dropped the boom on her she
00:17:38.780uh she was very upset and when i met with her she said well it feels like i'm 14 again i'm like what
00:17:45.82014 again yeah it feels like i'm 14 again and i'm being pressured into sex
00:17:51.020and uh at that moment is like you know it's an insight into someone's someone's personal economy
00:17:58.380how they're how they're how they're feeling these things and what a personal impact it is on them
00:18:03.180and it was actually a little bit disturbing to me to hear that because it's that sort of imposition
00:18:08.860of the of the mob on the individual where you're powerless and you're being forced to do something
00:18:14.460so intimate and so against what you know your interests are and that that really affected me and
00:18:23.420And just in kind of a more of a philosophical point too, and this wouldn't work as a legal
00:18:29.680argument, but this whole debate to me seems to be summed up in this is that we used to have a
00:18:36.720society where people were free to do what they wanted. And we had a right to do everything and
00:18:41.900anything unless there was a law that specifically forbade it. So you could say, I have a right to
00:18:47.420X. And as long as there wasn't a law forbidding X, that is your legal right to do it. But now
00:18:53.100the concept of the vaccine passport in particular coupled with the mandates for vaccination has
00:18:58.820really just completely turned that on its head we're now moving into a phase of our society
00:19:03.960where our constitutional order is going to be amended and changed drastically from that
00:19:11.080rights-based society where you're free to a society where permission must be sought for
00:19:16.720absolutely everything am i allowed to go to that place am i allowed to enter into a contract with
00:19:22.160that person? Well, I better make sure that I have the proper medical procedures before I do.
00:19:27.660And that's a grand rewriting of our society at a very foundational legal level.
00:19:34.840And people seem so accepting of it, which is mind-blowing. Not everybody, not everybody.
00:19:41.140It is mind-blowing. And so early on, I'm probably not alone, but early on during the COVID pandemic,
00:19:47.980I started reading a lot and trying to figure out, is there any historical precedent for this?
00:19:53.580And so I read a few books on the Spanish flu and the Black Death.
00:19:58.620But the other one that really, really kind of disturbed me is I saw some of our premiers who were acting as strong men gaining in popularity.
00:20:08.800It seemed everywhere, actually, other than Alberta.
00:20:11.480Mr. Kenny was struggling in the polls.
00:20:13.700But for instance, Pallister, I believe, if I remember correctly, was wildly popular for a while in Manitoba. And it's that sort of strongman thing. And it got me thinking. So I cracked open William Shire's book, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, and took a careful look at the interwar period.
00:20:32.280and you know after Hitler got out of prison and he decided to use democratic means to gain power
00:20:39.000he also realized that there was two things that were important that the social democrats were
00:20:43.760doing the social democrats had perfected the use of propaganda to create spiritual terror
00:20:49.780and something that Hitler really really admired spiritual terror and I thought wow that's a really
00:20:56.420strange term that I've never heard before but it was this constant propaganda of you're not safe
00:21:01.280you're not safe and it created this oppressive environment and then the other side he realized
00:21:06.260is that people had become so used to the social programs the rich social programs that were
00:21:11.820available in germany at the time we never really think about that but they had a relatively good
00:21:17.580pension plan state pension and workers insurance and other such things at the time and he realized
00:21:23.960that people are going to be more concerned with losing these benefits and programs than they are
00:21:29.040with losing the liberty and so i think we're we're kind of there now where people are are so
00:21:35.740deeply concerned with their security that they're going to give up their liberty for a short-term
00:21:41.820gain in what they think is a is security and i think that people are sorry to interrupt you
00:21:47.860derek do you think people are now starting to wake up more and more slowly i mean and the reason i
00:21:53.580ask that is because you know d-day is coming when i say d-day i mean like you know the dates are
00:21:58.640coming for people to get their second vaccination so they can go to work keep their jobs and uh you
00:22:04.620know even school year is starting again very soon uh they're talking about vaccinating kids who are
00:22:09.860under 12 here in manitoba they're doing it with kids who are not yet 12 but will be 12 by the end
00:22:15.440of the year and a lot of people are furious about this and a lot of people are saying good even
00:22:22.060though we know statistically the children are not affected by this virus whatsoever this divide
00:22:28.420is amazing and something i've been looking for but i haven't been able to find derek you can
00:22:32.720answer this because you read the book the interwar period when when the rise of hitler started
00:22:38.600happening and he started vilifying the jews this didn't happen overnight this took years to happen
00:22:44.460yeah and that's what i keep saying to the people these days when they laugh at the comparison
00:22:49.120between now and what happened back in the 1930s um i say you guys this didn't happen overnight it
00:22:55.480took him 10 years to get to the death camps or maybe seven or eight years to get to that
00:22:59.240there's about 10 years there's about 43 was when they they started the death camps in earnest0.57
00:23:04.980yeah 33 is when the nazis came to power and yeah it started off with jews aren't allowed to hold
00:23:12.100these certain government positions yep i mean there's a direct parallel to unvaccinated aren't0.77
00:23:16.780allowed to hold government positions jews aren't allowed to travel unvaccinated aren't allowed to0.69
00:23:22.600travel i mean then it progressed to jews need to live in the ghettos so i don't know maybe we'll
00:23:26.740see that video that you said you're going to be covering later i don't know what that's all about
00:23:29.940well i'll tell you this that in australia what we've seen is you can't go within five kilometers
00:23:34.700or leave the area of your home within five kilometers without some kind of a work pass or
00:23:39.860permit did you see that possibly happening here and this is only speculation i know i've got a
00:23:44.480couple of lawyers on the show tonight but here we are talking about it why not i mean if they're
00:23:49.560doing it in Australia why couldn't they do it here under the guise of keeping you safe well I'll tell
00:23:54.740you one reason why I don't think that would necessarily happen here I don't know what the
00:23:59.820the issue is with Australian law enforcement but I just cannot see Canadian law enforcement doing
00:24:06.760and enforcing the things that Australian law enforcement are going to do and I think
00:24:10.720there there's clear evidence of this by the fact that when uh last spring or this past spring uh
00:24:17.760the doug ford the government on ontario gave police the power to randomly stop any person
00:24:24.960to demand to know why they're outside their home during the stay-at-home order
00:24:28.500pretty much all the police forces in ontario as a group they came out publicly saying
00:24:35.500we do not accept that power we will not conduct random stops but so back when that happened i
00:24:42.360knew that canadian law enforcement is different than australian law enforcement because if they
00:24:46.160refuse that power i i think they would refuse to stop people to see are you more than five
00:24:51.420kilometers outside your uh where you live well we've we've heard about toronto police not wanting
00:24:57.080to enforce these mandates but in quebec they seemed very happy to do that during the big curfew
00:25:01.600they had in i think montreal and i'm not sure if it was province-wide or if it was just a city thing
00:25:07.060but i mean i thought wow that's amazing you can't walk down the street in montreal after eight or
00:25:12.460nine o'clock at night police gonna stop and ask you for your papers like that was crazy to me
00:25:17.040eric what do you think yeah i think that's crazy too and uh i think but i think quebec might be a
00:25:23.740little bit distinct in this in this sense uh they are they are a different culture than the rest of
00:25:29.020canada and i i can't speak for any place other than alberta but i know that the albertan cops
00:25:35.860that i know have no interest in this and i mean anyone can be angered to the point where they do
00:25:42.400something stupid and fortunately our police officers are generally trained pretty well not
00:25:48.140to get aggravated but i mean so you you do have outliers right but saying there's a pattern like0.99
00:25:54.800what we've seen in australia i think that we're generally better off than that but the other thing
00:26:00.800that i think the other thing that's important is that um i don't think there is this huge
00:26:06.700like we even the way we've been talking about it tonight it's like we're assuming the other side is
00:26:13.840this massive monolith and it it does feel that way but I'm I'm starting to wonder if what we're
00:26:20.500actually up against is a little bit of a of a curtain with a man behind the no this is a
00:26:26.620reference to the Wizard of Oz not an actual cabal a man behind a curtain pulling levers right
00:26:34.400And so I do wonder if what gives us the impression that we're up against something much bigger is that the media has closed ranks and is presenting one incessant, relentless message to us all day long.
00:26:49.300Coupled with the fact that public sector unions have seemed to have viewed this as a great opportunity to increase their franchise.
00:26:59.040and so we're left with well here in alberta we're going to be ending we're going to be ending up in
00:27:06.620a labor dispute we're being told can you believe it the nurses are talking about striking during
00:27:11.580a pandemic oh here too absolutely i mean they got what they wanted during a pandemic because
00:27:16.660what choice does the government have but to give it to them because people are going to be so scared
00:27:21.720right yeah but i wonder sometimes if um if this is a is this a little bit of a a show that we're
00:27:28.520watching it's the media and uh the incessant public sector union stuff going on all the time
00:27:36.540and we end up with the impression that there's many more people against us than we realize
00:27:41.860and though the point of it being that we need to get together and realize at these like
00:27:49.740demonstrations that you're at that people we're not alone and canada is the place that it always
00:27:55.440has been and we need to actually live as if we're still free and i think that i'm really hoping
00:28:04.940that's the case that it's not the 80 that we're up against i i see i think i see evidence of that
00:28:12.260too and i just look at the wide range of people who've reached out to me in recent weeks and it's
00:28:18.120been a lot of people asking for help but it's also been a lot of people that have seen some of
00:28:22.200the videos i've done on don't talk tv where i've called i've talked about vaccine passports and
00:28:27.540and i've talked about the uh you know coercion and things like that and there's been a lot of
00:28:31.900response to that and and i've been contacted by lots of people have been vaccinated and
00:28:37.320i just think walking around on the streets when you deal with real people not people on the
00:28:42.900internet. I just haven't seen people having the same of the sort of vehemence that you see online
00:28:50.920and people still seem to be normal people. You see a lot of people going around. I know
00:28:55.540when, you know, there was a protest in Stratford, there was no one reacting angrily. I mean,
00:29:03.680online, there were a few people who were saying, oh, they're going to, you know, people are going
00:29:07.080to die because of them. This is terrible. But out on the street, when I was walking down the street,
00:29:11.400every I saw a car lots of cars driving by and people were honking their horns and waving at
00:29:16.020the protesters and I didn't see I mean I wasn't there for very long but I didn't see anyone
00:29:21.560being aggressive or angry towards the people that were out there and I mean that was back in April0.99
00:29:27.520but I do hope that the whole vaccine passport and the the the job the mandate for jobs will0.99
00:29:36.080maybe finally be a bridge too far for a lot of people. And a lot of people I know who are0.86
00:29:41.780vehemently, vehemently in favor of the vaccine, even for them, they're saying, no, that's too
00:29:46.100much. That's not right to be taking away people's livelihood like that. I don't agree with their
00:29:50.520choice, but that's not right. Let's go back to the beginning of the conversation. We were talking
00:29:55.320about, uh, being fired because of your vaccine status. And you guys have been taking a lot of0.57
00:30:01.540consultations what is the recourse what should people do that that's a really tough question
00:30:09.940and i don't say that just to be sly and avoid the question i say you're a lawyer derrick come on
00:30:16.960i say that to uh to couch my terms carefully because frankly i don't think we really know
00:30:23.440because this hasn't happened before i i at least i'm not familiar with mass firings in
00:30:30.640Canada because someone refused or a group of people refused to take a vaccine and so with that
00:30:36.780with that foundation I would say what people should try to do is is really think carefully
00:30:43.740about why they don't want to take the vaccine and then consider whether or not they can rely on an
00:30:50.800exemption in the human rights code within their province if they have a private employer and if
00:30:56.120they have a public employer then perhaps the charter might apply too it's different with
00:31:00.940unions if you're a unionized employee you you pretty much have to take recourse through your
00:31:06.860union and once that avenue is exhausted then there may be other things open to you but in private
00:31:12.860private contract for employment it's probably best to try to negotiate with your employer rather
00:31:19.520than just be fired my head my advice to people so far has always been let's find a way to keep you
00:31:25.700in your job i know there's there's some people who uh some lawyers that have been getting a lot
00:31:32.340of press recently who are talking and railing against exemptions and trying to keep people in
00:31:37.840their jobs that we need to actually like challenge this outright in the courts and well yeah that's
00:31:42.720that's a great remedy two or three years from now when the court finally issues a decision on this
00:31:47.680in the meantime they haven't been working so my goal has always been to find a client
00:31:53.240specific uh way that we can keep that client working and not impoverished over that time so
00:32:02.880that often is exemptions and trying to deal with your boss in a reasonable way trying to get an
00:32:08.120accommodation so many people have been working from home for years and let's just continue that
00:32:14.980why why should i be vaccinated if i've been working home uh at home for the last 15 years
00:32:20.440nothing changes i shouldn't have to lose my job over this as well and so those are the types of
00:32:26.180solutions that i've been trying to trying to help people think through and what their rights are too
00:32:31.120if they actually do get terminated and that that can be a little more difficult and people should
00:32:36.680really go speak to a lawyer about their specific circumstances at that point you know what's
00:32:41.560interesting um is that we all sit back as us non-lawyer types and we go isn't there one
00:32:48.640freaking thing that we can do just one motion one lawyer could step up and say this is all illegal
00:32:54.780everything you province isn't but it's all illegal all of it we're gonna we're all gonna sue you
00:33:00.040right now and it's just not like that is it like it's got to be on a case by case basis almost in
00:33:05.660a and it's got to work its way through the provincial court and then if you're lucky enough
00:33:09.920and you've got the money maybe you can get it to the supreme court of canada and it just takes
00:33:14.420forever as you were saying derek what have you been saying nicholas what have you been saying
00:33:17.780of your people. Yeah, well, I've been saying very similar to what Derek said, although, I mean,
00:33:23.420I echo what he says. We're in uncharted territory. Whether you've been working employment law for
00:33:28.100your whole career or you're picking it up on the fly like I am, this is unprecedented, what's going
00:33:34.600on in here. And I mean, and especially the whole medical coercion aspect of it, because, I mean,
00:33:41.540everyone knew that you couldn't do this. As of a few weeks ago, everyone knew that. And let me give
00:33:46.300you one example. The Department of National Defense, up until about a week ago, had an FAQ
00:33:52.140page, you know, COVID vaccine FAQ page up on their site that said this vaccine, no ifs, ands, or buts,
00:34:00.480this vaccine is voluntary and will continue to be voluntary. It will not be made mandatory.
00:34:06.860We can't make it mandatory because that would be against the law. And if you're receiving pressure
00:34:11.220from other people in the armed forces, you should report that to your chain of command because
00:34:15.640we don't want people being uh being bullied about their vaccine choice i mean you can go on the way
00:34:22.460back machine and and find that that page uh as of august the 13th it was still in that form
00:34:29.260then they they deleted it and replaced it in like pure 1984 fashion like winston smith
00:34:37.260cutting out the article and with ogilvy and putting in putting the new article now they've
00:34:42.880got a faq saying this is going to happen so get ready to be jabbed basically like they're saying
00:34:49.120this is coming from the government and all these you know i see ctv coming out with well you know
00:34:55.560we have these legal experts and they say that this can be done and i'm i'm thinking like those same
00:35:00.600experts six months ago would have said no way no way can this happen this just can't be done so
00:35:06.720we're in this um you know bizarre situation it's hard to advise people because i'm telling them
00:35:13.020look like i i can see the law here's the cases i can show you the cases where the supreme court
00:35:17.820has clearly said you can't do this but it's happening so i and the fact that it's happening
00:35:23.460you need to look for practical solutions because if we have to nicholas if if we have precedents
00:35:28.960set down in law that says you can't do this and yet they're doing it doesn't that give us grounds
00:35:33.960for some kind of injunctive measures well you guys i love you both thank you for sharing from
00:35:42.780and nicholas wandsbutter you guys i mean the looks on your faces just now funny well you're
00:35:49.760two different questions there would we do we want it to be the case and is it the case of course we
00:35:57.240want it to be the case and you know if someone comes in with a briefcase full of money we'll do
00:36:02.900everything we can to make that happen. But the thing is, at the same time, probably have an
00:36:08.600ethical obligation to tell the client with that briefcase of money, this is going to be really
00:36:13.900hard to do. Right. Yeah. Injunctive relief is very, very difficult to get. And I mean,
00:36:21.540if you take a step back and look to normal circumstances, it makes sense why it should
00:36:25.840be difficult because you're asking for the court to make a ruling on something without the full
00:36:31.300legal argument and the full evidence being put before the court. So, I mean, if you're on the
00:36:35.480receiving end of that, you don't want it to be easy. I mean, if you're in some dispute with
00:36:39.680your neighbor and they're asking the court for an injunction for you to not be able to use part
00:36:44.520of your land or something, and you don't get to argue the full case to decide that, I mean,
00:36:49.280that should be something hard to have. I mean, the problem is, I mean, no justice system is
00:36:56.500built is equipped to handle a scenario where all levels of government and private society
00:37:03.380just have no regard for the law and don't care what the laws and do things anyway i mean it's
00:37:08.060the whole it's the flip side of the of united non-compliance they're basically doing united
00:37:13.620non-compliance with the rule of law so how do you you know it's the same problem they can't fire
00:37:19.180everyone if everyone doesn't comply if they're all not complying we can't sue everyone or bring
00:37:24.560court cases on everything all at once and the court case the courts can't handle that it's amazing
00:37:30.360it's amazing to me that the government like not just the federal government but every provincial
00:37:36.260government in the past 18 months has blatantly broke the law as far as i can see and they have
00:37:44.580possibly breached the charter of rights and freedoms in several different sections and yet
00:37:50.280nobody can do anything about it and they continue to roll over people it's amazing to me
00:37:55.440so i mean i i have some experience with that sort of thing that you just said and i mean this is
00:38:01.900this is something that uh one of my colleagues and i wrote about at the fraser for the fraser
00:38:07.080institute number of years ago we wrote a paper on section seven of the charter it was i believe it
00:38:12.180was the 30th anniversary of the charter that the date and then we wrote like the charter after 30
00:38:17.860years and our favorite section is section seven um everyone is it has a right to life liberty
00:38:23.280security the person the right not to be deprived thereof except by the principles of fundamental
00:38:26.620justice well not bad but that's the the one place that the word liberty occurs in our constitution
00:38:33.540and uh and that's that's a really important word and it's we wrote an article about how
00:38:39.900that term right from the very first decision on that word there was a judicial gloss as some
00:38:47.040lawyers would say put over that term basically our our word was it was eviscerated the the term
00:38:54.020liberty became almost the opposite of what liberty means and uh it was a very sad day very first
00:38:59.680decision 1985 and uh so at that point you could only rely on liberty when it was this very very
00:39:07.240high level unbelievable infringement that of these decisions that you might take make once in a
00:39:13.320lifetime. But when it's small decisions that you make on a day-to-day basis, all added up in
00:39:18.980aggregate, that never equals infringement of liberty under the Charter. And so we actually
00:39:25.300postulated at that time that the government of Canada is perfectly constitutionally allowed to
00:39:30.060bring in a dress code. And lo and behold, in 2020, the Canadian governments brought in a dress code.
00:39:37.660We all had to wear these muzzles on our faces. And there is no constitutional resource or recourse against that sort of thing. So, you know, these these sorts of issues have been brewing for years in our in our constitution, in our legal order.0.96
00:39:53.260And it's these times when we're in extraordinary times.
00:39:57.040It's in these extraordinary times when we need these documents to protect us, when we need to have clear rules about how we conduct ourselves as a society and how the government is allowed to comport itself against the individual.
00:40:10.880It's those times when we need these documents.
00:40:14.260And it's been really surprising and sad to me to see how quickly it all collapsed.
00:40:19.600isn't that interesting too i've heard um watched many videos of police saying if you've got a
00:40:26.840problem with it then vote these guys out in the next election and it seems like every political
00:40:31.840party in this country except for the people's party of canada is in favor of some kind of
00:40:36.680vaccine passport or uh you know automatic or you know mandatory testing or mandatory vaccinations
00:40:43.820and so how are you going to vote your way out of this you can't if all the major parties agree
00:40:47.980about it. It's frustrating. Let's move on to the next thing here, guys. There's a lot of people who
00:40:53.160are very concerned about their children. Already in most provinces, I think in every province in
00:40:58.940this country, we've got children 12 years of age and older actually able to consent to go and get
00:41:06.400this vaccine. And now they're talking about by early next year, they're talking about being able
00:41:12.940to vaccinate children like out of the womb fresh out of the womb all the way up uh that was on ctv
00:41:21.880the other day now there was a clip i saw that was sent to me i think about 328 times and i watched
00:41:29.420this mla from new brunswick talking to a bunch of angry constituents uh in the street outside of his
00:41:35.580constituency office and they were yelling at him about their children you can't do this to our kids
00:41:41.780what's the matter with you and the mla turned around looked at the guy and he said the children
00:41:47.060belong to the province and i went what and then somebody told me look it up dude and i did and i
00:41:56.740was very disappointed with what i found nicholas is that the case do the the kids belong to the
00:42:02.500province the kids belong to the state well well first of all i i'm kind of wondering what you
00:42:08.740looked up because i'm uh that's that's actually not something i'm familiar with i don't see how
00:42:15.420the state can own children but let me say from a practical perspective to an extent canadians
00:42:23.020society canadians as a whole we're reaping what we've sown by sending children to government
00:42:27.500school by abdicating parental duty to the state in practice the state does own the children i mean if
00:42:33.940the children are in the state's custody six, seven hours a day in public school and then in
00:42:41.340extracurriculars, can you really say that the state doesn't own your children? The state
00:42:46.160has more influence and sees them more than you do. And that's also a key factor of how we are
00:42:52.140here. When we're talking about voting your way out, not being able to vote your way out. Well,
00:42:55.520of course you can't vote your way out because politics are always downstream of culture.
00:42:59.240and and part of how's that culture formed i mean if uh if you're handing your children over to the
00:43:05.740state that's the culture that you're going to have 10 20 years from now if when they're
00:43:09.840in that milieu all day every day so yeah what i was referring to was uh somebody sent me a link
00:43:18.400on child family service agencies through provinces in the country and if they get a phone call
00:43:25.100from somebody anybody who says that there is some kind of uh ruckus going on in the home
00:43:31.180and they can they suspect the children are in danger they can immediately pull the children
00:43:35.140out of that home without any proof that anything had happened to those kids
00:43:40.300they have a lot of power and so that's what the connection was there i think with that mla was
00:43:47.280saying and it made me wonder how can how can any state body do that i suppose it's a good thing
00:43:56.080until it's not a good thing because that power can be abused well yeah that's the thing i mean
00:44:00.080as you say it's a good thing it's not a good thing and i mean the thing is people have tolerated
00:44:06.860these children's aid societies and apprehending children because for the most part it doesn't
00:44:12.560affect them because who do they go after that's the low-hanging fruit i mean no i don't want to
00:44:16.840be um uh you know disrespectful to to uh people who are underprivileged but it's the disenfranchised
00:44:23.360members of society who are the ones that have their children like they're they're not going to
00:44:28.420go to some banker's house if someone if his neighbor says oh there's some argument i'm scared
00:44:32.820his kids are in trouble they're not going to go there and take his kids it's going to be0.98
00:44:35.920i mean in manitoba it's going to be an indigenous family they'll show up a lot faster there than0.57
00:44:42.340they'll show up in tuxedo or charleswood yeah too and and then you know it's out of sight out of
00:44:47.520mind to the average person they don't care that you know i mean there's stories all the time in
00:44:51.520winnipeg about hotels being full of children who've been apprehended by the children's family
00:44:56.800services in manitoba i mean again this is another thing where we're we're reaping what we've sown
00:45:02.760that we've tolerated this for for years and years and years and and it it's intolerable it shouldn't
00:45:10.000have been tolerated yeah and i'm gonna i'm gonna make a pop culture reference if i'm allowed
00:45:15.040okay so if uh if um people are familiar with game of thrones uh either the show or the book
00:45:21.220books um there's a character in there that is sort of like i think what we're talking about and that
00:45:27.700is uh theon grayjoy okay and so theon grayjoy was a ward and what award means is you're taken
00:45:35.720from your family your family was defeated and you're raised by your enemy now why would you take
00:45:42.920someone else's kid and raise them as your own sounds like an inconvenience but what you're
00:45:47.160doing is you're subverting them you're you're subverting that culture you're raising the next
00:45:52.440generation to be like you and to to estrange him from his own past and i think it's easy to watch
00:46:01.880that type of show or other other uh shows or stories where there's wards and things like that
00:46:08.600in them and not really understand how subversive and awful that is but in some ways not to be
00:46:16.220hyperbolic but in some ways what nicholas was talking about originally about how we put our
00:46:21.220kids in government schools and then parents haven't taken their their duty their moral duty
00:46:28.040I believe, to be the primary educator of their child. And this many years on, we've realized
00:46:33.500our children are de facto wards of the state. And it becomes very difficult. It's very society
00:46:41.340undermining, individual culture undermining. And you know what? There's many Mennonites. I know
00:46:48.260there's a big Mennonite population south of Winnipeg. I think around 1905, many Mennonites
00:46:54.880actually left Western Canada and moved south into South America and Mexico. And they fled
00:47:02.100because public schooling was being made mandatory. They saw the writing on the wall. This is going
00:47:07.640to totally change our culture and subvert us. And so they fled the country. And so like residential0.95
00:47:14.220schools, you were talking about, you know, when you try and take a child and raise them as your
00:47:19.740own you're trying to turn them into you and and so on and so on and so on yeah there's so how
00:47:23.700how can they make this a thing how can they actually i mean they're talking about wanting
00:47:28.260to vaccinate these these little children early next year will they be able to do this without
00:47:34.600parental consent currently i don't think so uh there's there's one case that i've been able to
00:47:43.320find somewhat on the topic and i i have shared it with nicholas it's a case out of bc called
00:47:48.920Taves and Wisner, I believe. And it's an instance where an 11-year-old girl, I believe she was in
00:47:55.760grade seven at the time, ended up getting a vaccination at school. Now, the consent form0.55
00:48:02.260went home, but was never returned. So it was an accidental vaccination, I suppose. And, you know,
00:48:10.120kids, she may have felt pressured into doing it and just went along and never wanted it.
00:48:16.220but in the end the court didn't like it much considered it battery and found that the act
00:48:22.540was illegal now fortunately in this case there's no sign that anything happened to the child she
00:48:29.660was fine and there was no vaccine injury or anything like that and it was a relatively
00:48:35.260innocuous vaccine from what i understand but the court did find it was battery and awarded damages
00:48:41.260So if we're going on how the law has been until 2021, unconsented to child vaccinations are illegal.
00:48:52.240OK, what about any sort of forced vaccinations in Canada for anybody, three year old, 33 year old, 73 year old?
00:49:01.600I was reading or I watched the I'm not sure if you guys watched the video I sent you earlier today.
00:49:05.940You're probably both extremely busy and didn't have time for it.
00:49:08.540But there is it seems a section in the Constitution that talks about forced vaccinations being illegal in this country.
00:49:16.980And it's because it's, you know, entrenched in the Constitution.
00:49:20.760It cannot be changed unless they reopen the Constitution.
01:05:11.120But I guess the government hasn't been following the latest stories on vaccinated people spreading the virus, the Delta variant.
01:05:21.860Also next Tuesday, food courts, museums and galleries will also need to start checking visitors for proof they are fully vaccinated.
01:05:29.480You know what? Guys, if there's any people who work at these places, just tell them, no, I'm not doing this. I'm not doing this. I am not asking to see somebody's vaccine passport. I'm not. I'm just not doing it. Fire me. Fucking fire me. I'm not doing it.
01:05:49.560that's what we need massive non-compliance
01:05:53.520united non-compliance at this point this is going too far now
01:12:48.580i'm a simple canadian trying to keep my community a community you may be a lot like me there are
01:12:58.160many many of us to all of the business owners in manitoba and i'm going to extend this to
01:13:03.940any other province that has a vaccine passport looming understand that for over the past year
01:13:12.460Your own government has limited, fined, and regulated you into a corner in hopes of pushing you past the point of failure.
01:13:21.320The Walmarts and McDonald's and Amazons of the world have amazing lobbyists and a business model much different than yours, much more draconian, lockdown friendly.
01:13:32.220Understand that people like myself played along with the masking and the distancing and other theater for you.
01:13:39.120I don't require a face diaper or chemicals on my hands or arrows to show me how to move about
01:13:45.440your building, but I did it for you. I didn't want you to suffer. Remember that? Support local
01:13:53.600business. Remember? I tried to play along so your business could keep employing you
01:13:59.940and your co-workers and feeding your families. I told myself it was a necessary evil to play along
01:14:05.760so that our Lord Pallister and Sheriff Rusin would pass by our communities
01:14:09.540without inflicting even more damage or wickedness.
01:14:15.680Now that I see many of these same businesses that we try to keep alive