00:13:01.580in which I only, with a very little small portion
00:13:04.220my tongue and my cheek argue that andy burnham will save britain there is a bit of a caveat which
00:13:10.220is that if there's a fiscal crisis very soon then that might not happen but if he is allowed to do
00:13:17.100this it will destroy the economy so much that that is in my opinion the only way the british
00:13:23.420public will actually reset their attitudes to all of these things because one of the things i talk
00:13:28.060about in the article is the british public have a schizophrenic attitude to tax and spend if you ask
00:13:36.060people about tax and spend it's actually very unpopular only 36 percent of people in this
00:13:41.180country say that they're in favor of tax and spend uh in the in the general sweep of things but then
00:13:47.900when you ask them about individual policies if you ask them about a wealth tax if you ask them about
00:13:53.020a mansion tax if you ask them about taxing the top one percent more taxing the top 10
00:13:58.060more re-nationalizing the water companies re-nationalizing railways re-nationalizing
00:14:04.380your grandma they're massively massively massively in favor of it and my argument is the british
00:14:10.460public will remain in favor of all of these things until this world view is utterly discredited by
00:14:15.580reality which i would argue is what happened in the 70s which is why you then had a period of time
00:14:21.900when you were able as a country to pursue a different set of policies that actually created
00:14:27.260the the modern economy as we have it i am with all respect to our fellow citizens convinced that
00:14:33.580until that reality manifests itself in disaster we will not quite there is no argument to be won
00:14:39.980anymore people are people believe that prosperity is generated by taking more from other people
00:14:46.460That is the British attitude to these things, as Andrew Neill said.
00:14:50.420And until we have an economic reality that really hurts people, which is something I really, really don't want, it will be absolutely terrible.
00:15:00.500All four of us are going to be more or less insulated or cushioned from it, certainly more than the ordinary person.
00:15:05.660And it's because of that that I've spent my entire public life arguing against this worldview.
00:15:10.920but i i i am i feel entirely powerless and i feel that better people than all of us have made better
00:15:19.640arguments than all of us about this and i don't think the british public care i think they want
00:15:25.140to have a go at socialism and i think the elation that you saw not only in the room at the labor
00:15:31.440party conference but across the media across social media from across the political spectrum
00:15:36.700actually is not because andy burnham talked about his dad movingly although a lot of people are
00:15:42.120seduced by the sort of personal narrative i think the reason this stuff got the reaction that it got
00:15:47.920is that he's offering a lot of people what they want well of course the difficulty here is that
00:15:54.200how you poll particular questions will produce particular outcomes um because as you say even
00:15:59.060though you could look on net what the british republic seem to believe about economic policy
00:16:05.200more broadly you break it up you get different responses i suppose one thing maybe this is a
00:16:08.780note of optimism is that i think the british public where economic matters are concerned
00:16:12.380are actually more persuadable than it often seems like even the kind of quote-unquote austerity is
00:16:17.300we can argue about whether or not that was meaningfully austerity that was very popular
00:16:21.660i mean that was a program for the country which the public felt that was necessary that needed
00:16:26.760to be implemented to write the public finances of course it didn't actually put us in better
00:16:30.800stead economically in the end but nevertheless that was something that the public were open
00:16:35.080towards the thing about Andy Burnham and his economic outlook I think he's going to be
00:16:39.220disastrous for the economy for the country but maybe not in the way that you think Constantine
00:16:43.440just in the sense that I think he represents the continuation of what Keir Starmer was doing of
00:16:48.460what the last conservative government was doing rather than any particular acceleration of it
00:16:53.080the weddedness to net zero for instance which I'm sure will come on to in relation to the diesel
00:16:58.060crisis, the weddedness to the just kind of trundling along rather than engaging in the
00:17:03.760kind of spending cuts, restructuring of the economy that is necessary. If you listen to
00:17:08.740that speech quite closely, it's also, I might be proven wrong by future events. There's an
00:17:14.340element where I think he's just going to go down as a kind of a bit of a left-wing prick
00:17:18.200tease to a certain extent. He will say things like, in that speech, we're going to lift
00:17:22.260the Thatcher era ban on nationalisation. Then when it comes to him saying what it is that
00:17:26.260he actually intends to do it's more public control which could be everything from having some kind of
00:17:32.160poncy community representative on the board of an energy company just or to having the mayor being
00:17:37.920able to call in bosses of energy companies it can be something a lot lower than that i think he is
00:17:41.940kind of aware of the fact that even when he wasn't leader of the labor party him even just sounding
00:17:46.500off about the bond markets moved the bond markets i think he knows he's actually quite hemmed in i
00:17:51.600I think he is going to be disastrous for the country, for the economy.
00:17:54.680I think it could well accelerate the decline
00:17:57.220in the way that you're slightly tongue-in-cheek hoping for Konstantin,
00:27:20.680You make a good point because Burnham started his speech
00:27:24.120saying enough of the division of the last 10 years of politics yeah before going into an unbelievably
00:27:31.760divisive speech what could be more divisive than brexit everyone's finished with just no one wants
00:27:37.840to revisit that i mean i know they do all those remain of front measures i i would say i by the
00:27:42.600way this is going to sound very wet but i actually sport my ballot for brexit although i'm now very
00:27:47.100very hard brexit and i don't think we need to go much further um i certainly don't want to go and
00:27:52.120And the reason because I think that is because all the remain lie, all the remain arguments proved to be lies.
00:27:58.800But that's a conversation for another day.
00:28:00.100But there is something on this Brexit thing I need to pick up because it's a crazy lie that Labour keeps keeps selling.
00:28:08.020They keep saying that immigration was illegal immigration was easier to deal with when we were within the EU.
00:28:15.720And the argument is, because of the Dublin Protocol, the Dublin Agreement, we could send back illegal entrants to wherever they first came from.
00:28:27.180Sorry, wherever they first entered in the EU.
00:57:44.160a cell and do something that you just sort of
00:57:46.020on the dark web find kind of local petty criminals and pay them money to do something even if they're
00:57:51.220not entirely sure what it's for and what the actual point is all of these questions are important but
00:57:56.660like for a while we were expected to believe that we shouldn't speculate and that maybe it was just
00:58:00.420a stag do that got our hand or something i mean it was absolutely absurd and that that's that
00:58:04.820response now that the government always have which is do not speculate this has nothing to do with
00:58:10.740trying to protect any investigation this has nothing to do with trying to make sure things
00:58:14.100are done in the right way it's just a way of telling people to shut up and it's not they don't
00:58:17.620speculate it's because they say don't speculate on this but when it's danny tomo burnham is prepared
00:58:25.220to say oh yeah he's definitely racist so it's it's it's always the same bloody story it's that
00:58:30.900don't speculate about what's going on with axel ruda cabana and then kiaz karma comes out and
00:58:35.700goes oh yeah everyone protesting this is far right so you're speculating it's always the speculation
00:58:40.820is one way it's two-tier speculation it's and it's it's this is why i get so irritated by this it's
00:58:47.300through every part of our society this two-tier system well and it's not just two-tier speculation
00:58:53.540it's two-tier commentary so for example shabana mahmoud the home secretary will go on tv and say
00:59:00.020we will deal with the dover protesters to the fullest extent of the law when asked about
00:59:05.940other cases she will say we don't comment on individual cases right there's so much of this
00:59:13.060going on you almost get tired of pointing out the hypocrisy yeah and i think you when you say you
00:59:19.300get tired of pointing out the hypocrisy actually that's a really profound point because when
00:59:24.660something is just so obvious and you see it wherever you go and you point it out and you say
00:59:32.340what about this and what about that and what about this and what about that eventually what
00:59:37.460happens is you become demoralized because what is becoming more and more obvious to you is you're
00:59:44.500living in a society where there's one set of rules for one people and there's another set for others
00:59:52.020and i don't remember that being the case in our society not in my lifetime now you could use
00:59:59.300certain examples and you know there was racism there was quite severe racism particularly in
01:00:05.220the 80s and the 70s when I was growing up there was an unfairness but we addressed that we talked
01:00:10.000about that but with what's happening now there just seems to be a disinterest in it which
01:00:17.280I find baffling because what that means is that we are going to erode the respect for the rule
01:00:26.180of law and justice and the justice system in this country and what people seem to fail to realize is
01:00:34.100all of these things they're done because we agree to that this works we agree that this system
01:00:42.320this culture and this society works for us but it seems like we're getting to a place where
01:00:49.460we don't think it works for us and that is really really really dangerous and again this to me is
01:00:58.300just another example of this type of behavior really well don't worry francis the good thing
01:01:06.080is uh the green party have come up with a way of dealing with all of these challenges uh which tom
01:01:12.300you've written an article in the telegraph this week about uh the solution is to ban words tell
01:01:17.780us more about this yes surprise surprise the greens have still completely lost it where woke
01:01:26.320matters are concerned and this inclusive language guide is yet another example so it's ahead of
01:01:31.460their conference which is getting underway in brighton and the telegraph got their hands on
01:01:35.640this guide which points out to the members of the green party that there are certain words that they
01:01:40.760should avoid not talk about the n-word we're not talking about various slurs although i suppose
01:01:44.420various anti-semitic slurs they probably could be do being told not to use quite so openly in
01:01:48.660whatsapp groups and whatnot but it's words like mother and father um elderly which is a quite a
01:01:53.780new one to me uh homosexual is also out because it's insufficiently inclusive of non-binary people0.85
01:02:00.660the people who identify as plurals and all that uh what can we say instead can we say benders
01:02:08.740exactly fenders shirt lifters i presumably that's fine you get more retro with it maybe
01:02:13.700maybe that's way that's more inclusive i could do this winston i am surprised at the offensive
01:02:18.260language you're choosing to use in this instance given that you yourself came out as non-binary on
01:02:22.900brexit mate spoiling the battle is basically trans let's be honest yeah exactly it is so it's um0.54
01:02:36.020i can't you know i'm trying to think of a slow we can use for winston's fence sitting on that0.61
01:02:40.260that particular question but no it's uh this is i mean obviously it's nuts everyone knows that
01:02:44.580funny details that they've also included the words nutter and lunatic as things that you shouldn't
01:02:49.940say which as you rightly pointed out constant is just robbing us of our words that we can use to
01:02:54.060describe them presumably they're worried about alienating the nutter or lunatic communities
01:02:57.820but if you look at the green party these days and the kind of island of misfit toys that it has
01:03:02.340become under zap palance's leadership i don't think you should be worried about alienating
01:03:06.300those people the thing that's striking apart it's two things to me one of which is that we have a
01:03:11.440lot of in recent years we were tempted to believe that woke was over or at least that it had been
01:03:16.200pushed back sufficiently so that even left-wing parties knew that it wasn't a good idea to go
01:03:20.040down this road this is another example amongst many of that not being the case there are whole
01:03:24.300sections of progressive politics we'll talk about the labor party as well in a second because they've
01:03:27.520come out with some howlers this week which are entirely untouched by the sort of return to
01:03:32.340common sense that much of the rest of society were enjoying. They're like this kind of Amazonian
01:03:36.780tribe that has been undisturbed for its entire existence, or like the proverbial Japanese
01:03:40.980soldier in the jungle with his pronoun badge on still. They just haven't noticed. The world has
01:03:45.960moved on, but they haven't. So I guess that's an example of this. The other thing where the Green
01:03:48.900Party is concerned is not only is woke not dead, it's also gotten quite a lot darker. So they've
01:03:55.720kept all of this kind of fussy speech policing, which was the sort of embarrassing student union
01:04:01.240shtick but then they've bolted onto it the islamist apologism the israelophobia the going by the
01:04:09.100people who've washed up in their membership and even some of their parliamentary candidates
01:04:11.980outright anti-semitism you know the woke thing to chant from a festival stage a few years ago0.96
01:04:16.960was trans women are women now it's death death to the idf like in the space of quite a short
01:04:21.220amount of time not only is woke not going away it's mutated into something much more explicitly0.93
01:04:25.560sort of third worldists quite grim and not only is it just extending this kind of paternalistic
01:04:33.420posture towards it's like favored minorities it's also treating those disfavored minorities i.e
01:04:37.760jews with a level of sort of sulfurous scorn that you thought had disappeared from british
01:04:42.900politics frankly so it is a it's a slightly silly example but i think it's um of a probably a way
01:04:49.020into this whole question of you know woke one woke two some people talk about it and if it ever
01:04:54.260really went away to begin with well yeah you see this now i don't know if you saw this yesterday
01:04:59.620uh soella bravman was on question time and it feels like uh there was a moment when just calling
01:05:05.860everyone racist for expressing an opinion that kind of stopped for a while and i think that was
01:05:11.620maybe the moment in which we were all like oh woke is on the decline but it has now come back and now
01:05:19.460you've got the basically the spectacle of a bunch of white people calling a brown woman and soella
01:05:24.500bravman these white people have spent the last 10 years saying we must listen to ethnic minorities
01:05:28.500when they speak and white people need to shut up now there's a bunch of white people basically doing
01:05:32.980a struggle and struggle session with a british asian woman and calling uh everything she says
01:05:37.860racist because she says she's not english and it just feels like this whole thing is back with a
01:05:43.220vengeance yeah i think you go for it you go for it winston and then i remembered in school uh
01:05:54.560sorry not in school in uh when i was still with the band with mumford being in a band meeting and
01:06:00.060i said let's brainstorm this and someone said uh uh mind shower you can't say brainstorm that's
01:06:07.360a microaggression and because it's offence it's offensive to uh um people with uh who have um
01:06:14.660what's those attacks where you uh no yeah no i mean um epileptics yeah yeah um i'm just in the
01:06:23.100states and there's this story that's been going wild there about this lesbian bar in massachusetts
01:06:29.780it's it was it was totally failing as a bar the woman who one of the lesbians who started it had0.91
01:06:37.300to sleep in her truck because she couldn't afford to keep the thing going her partners had quit one0.82
01:06:41.720of them to be was to become a clown the other to become a drag queen and then they wanted to have1.00
01:06:47.180one day of the week where they didn't have to wear a mask so they wanted to saturdays on saturdays
01:06:53.660We don't have to wear a mask, which then just became this huge drama between them with the owner being accused of racism for crying in the Zoom meeting and for centering it and making it about her.
01:07:10.220Someone suggested they put Lady Gaga on. They said, no, no, Lady Gaga's cancelled. She's a Zionist.
01:07:15.880And it's escalated so far now that Hollywood want to make a movie about it.0.89
01:07:19.420but watching that story i was thinking aoc said well one was crazy well they've skipped two and
01:07:25.340three and they've just gone straight to four this is it's not gone anywhere these people they've
01:07:30.220dug in their heels they've just got new faces and sometimes getting quite sophisticated you know
01:07:34.780mamdani is pretty sophisticated this woke for this uh there's this new guy out in michigan as well
01:07:41.740and there there's a there's a silly version which is zach polanski and the green party but there's
01:07:47.180an intelligent version there as well which which is more robust and a lot more of a threat
01:07:54.620well absolutely and because wokeism is a type it's extremism and a lot of
01:08:02.940you can be a person who is extreme but that doesn't mean you're unintelligent it's a temperament
01:08:08.700there are people who are highly intelligent extremists just like there are people who are
01:08:12.460They're not very bright and quite moderate.
01:08:15.720So the people you all should be worried about are the people who are highly intelligent and have that temperament or that worldview or that outlook.
01:08:25.300Well, then let's stop talking about Zach Polanski.
01:08:28.220Yeah. Well, I don't actually want to stop talking about Zach Polanski because I think something very interesting is happening with Zach Polanski in that he is running in the by-election in St Pancras and Holborn by-election, to be precise, to be, which was Keir Starmer's former seat, to be a MP in our parliament.
01:08:49.660And he's running against Labour. And to me, this is the litmus test for the Greens. Burnham has come in.
01:08:58.220he has absolutely given the greens a body blow and this like i said this is a real test for the
01:09:05.800greens if they're going to do anything if they had their brief moment in 2025 and early 2026
01:09:13.400or was that a flourish a flash in the pan and politically their day in the sun is over we're
01:09:20.000going to see we are indeed frankie frankie that is quite interesting what's happening
01:09:25.600oh sorry no no no go ahead i was gonna i was gonna bring in the uh the labradors but we can
01:09:31.120oh we'll definitely get to that but just on the by-election so they the labor are running a hijabi
01:09:38.060girl of somali refugee heritage background so they're trying to outflank the green so it is
01:09:45.180actually worth keeping an eye on this and it's it's a big part of burnham's re shifting and
01:09:51.880and repositioning of the Labour Party and it it might if Zach Palancey can't win that seat
01:09:57.800it we might actually see the kind of end of this Green Party moment that they had it could be a bit
01:10:04.280of a high watermark we hope but I suppose looking at Labour conference this week though which is0.98
01:10:08.680where the Labradors come in it's clear that this tendency still is very much in presence there I
01:10:14.120think we've got this clip of this is the Labour nature minister who was speaking at a fringe
01:10:19.400meeting and had some pretty striking things to say about the countryside and fascism I think
01:10:24.980we've got that somewhere for us to all enjoy I do believe that the next election is going to be
01:10:29.340fought on a battle line of nature and rural affairs and there'll be the far right deciding
01:10:34.080and determining what that looks like and it'll be a vision a nostalgic vision of Britain that
01:10:39.400never really existed there'll be that warm ale a black lavender all by your feet in a pub that
01:10:43.980doesn't exist and it'll be a variant it'll be with symbolism of fox hunting all around them
01:10:48.820It'll be a very far right nostalgic vision of Britain that we don't want to have never really existed.
01:10:56.700There we go. This is Black. What are they talking about?1.00
01:10:59.660Can I just say Black Labs matter and this is Black Lab denial.1.00
01:11:03.880Black drabadoors are real. They exist. They have rights and their values.1.00
01:11:09.360And and by the way, I should say for our American viewers, a fringe meeting of a party conference is not where you get all the lunatics in your party0.99
01:11:18.140to get together and say the most stupid things they can think of it's just like a side meeting0.97
01:11:22.540at the conference and uh it's interesting she says the next election will be fought on rural0.99
01:11:27.100affairs which seems to me quite a stretch in and of itself but the idea that pubs labradors and warm
01:11:33.260ale never existed that is quite something it's i've done about you guys i'm struck by how much
01:11:39.500this has cut through as well like it feels like the more rural version of emily thornbury's tweet
01:11:44.460from the rochester instrued by-election with the with the england flag outside of the semi-detached
01:11:49.500house with the white van outside it's kind of sneering attitude towards white working-class
01:11:53.340patriotism this feels like the equivalent with the kind of rural life which um people from those
01:11:59.660communities are obviously pretty affronted by the idea that the way in which that they go about
01:12:03.980things the way in which people in rural england have been going about things for a very long time
01:12:07.260that sense of continuity which exists there which certainly doesn't exist in many of our towns and
01:12:11.420and cities anymore is something which is nefarious suspicious neo-fascistic it's particularly funny
01:12:18.120because this nature minister jenny riddell carpenter she's from rural suffolk um that
01:12:23.520they didn't take long for the tabloids to dig up pictures of her enjoying pints of ale in country
01:12:29.520pubs with a dog so there's this element of this which is just sheer performance i think but at
01:12:34.800the same time it does tap into this strain which really exists in the labor party women that defra
01:12:39.840is currently as a matter of government policy thinks that the countryside is too white that's0.58
01:12:44.200not just like a kind of bbc news talking point they've put out they've commissioned reports from
01:12:48.940various organizations like what can we possibly do to make the countryside less hostile to people
01:12:54.320from ethnic minority backgrounds because and the underlying assumption there being that problem
01:12:58.140with the countryside is it's full of english people doing english things and we've got to do0.96
01:13:01.760something about it um so this is not just a froid you know some kind of slip or some kind of brain0.97
01:13:07.780far it is a kind of tendency which exists and you think that whilst me myself i'm sort of an
01:13:11.760inveterate town he never really lived outside of the the city of the suburbs this is still
01:13:16.760something which people who live in the countryside if you know if you grew up in rural surrey or
01:13:20.980rural hampshire or whatever that sense of kind of not only just liking it for the landscaping
01:13:25.960because it's beautiful but the sense that there's a kind of connection to a history and a tradition
01:13:29.960you know the english tradition of pastoral poetry and the rural idyll and all of that is quite
01:13:34.280important to people i think even increasingly because of the way things are going a bit south
01:13:38.020in many of our cities even people who people wanting to escape to the countryside or liking
01:13:43.100the fact that it's there because it's it's a reminder that um some kind of quintessential
01:13:48.480englishness persists so to see that kind of painted as something that is yeah proto-nazi
01:13:53.940i you know i was kind of surprised by how out there it was if i'm honest
01:13:58.420it's a total mask slip i think that this this ideology sure it's she's not sort of hugely
01:14:08.000prominent but this is a wide widely held a view and they it's a classic far left view and that
01:14:14.260is now a part of the labor party i was saying in the last bit that uh we're seeing the end of the
01:14:19.120green party we're not seeing the end of the ideology it's just getting swallowed up into
01:14:22.000the labor party these people hate us and i i resent that what they they have any power and they have
01:14:28.340they choose the direction of this country why why govern over a country if you if you hate it
01:14:34.340well so you can destroy you want to remake in you know remake in your image but this does feel like0.67
01:14:42.140sort of agents of saruman destroying the shire while claiming it never existed in the first
01:14:47.060place because when i think of england and particularly rural england i mean that's kind
01:14:51.940of what the shire is based on it's a it's a people living in a peaceful and somewhat isolated and
01:14:57.340perhaps somewhat inward looking life but nonetheless the comforts that come with that
01:15:02.060um and one thing you didn't mention there tom that i think as someone who does live outside
01:15:07.840of the big cities and by choice that people do enjoy outside of the cities in a way that people
01:15:14.220who do live in them don't quite have at all is community and the sense that there is a pub that
01:15:21.340everyone in the village goes to that's where everyone has a drink they meet etc yeah exactly
01:15:28.540and and the thing is that actually is something that is incredibly valuable um and uh is not
01:15:35.500available in the cities and p and so the people who live in these transient non-communities in
01:15:41.100the centers of towns they not only don't appreciate it but to them it's a it's an inherently suspicious
01:15:47.100thing that you know this is what these these people get together and they they know each other
01:15:53.100and they're and and then the knowing of each other instead of moving flat every three months and
01:15:57.260not knowing their neighbors that's when the darkness sets in right that that's their idea
01:16:02.860um and that's why you know they clearly just hate that part the country as winston says
01:16:08.300anyway ladies and gentlemen what enough uplifting episode it has been yet again on off the fence
01:16:13.660this week we are francis and i are back tomorrow with andrew neil we are back with the guys uh
01:16:18.720next friday for off the fence again we will see you then