Western Standard - October 16, 2026


Fildebrandt and Kenney debate independence at CSFN Calgary

Hosted by
Mentioned
Eby, Doerkson and Lowan face off in B.C. leaders’ debate Pierre Poilievre keynote speech at the Canada Strong & Free Network in Calgary

Episode Stats


Length

1 hour

Words per minute

130.54

Word count

7,881

Sentence count

418

Harmful content

Hate speech

11

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 ¿Hola?
00:00:30.000 Thank you.
00:01:00.000 Thank you.
00:01:30.000 Thank you.
00:02:00.000 Ladies and gentlemen, please welcome to the stage Tristan Hopper, our moderator for today's
00:02:15.920 debate
00:02:28.800 oops wrong side you're gonna want to switch switch you have to go on the left
00:02:36.920 for a change. Oh, yeah. Right. Okay. So for the record, we're on the right.
00:02:46.700 This is not fair.
00:02:53.420 Now, now. Welcome, everybody, to the most exciting segment of CFSM
00:02:59.620 2026 here in Calgary. This is called The Sovereignty Vote and the Path Forward.
00:03:05.140 you'll be hearing from four of the most eloquent speakers on this topic from
00:03:09.640 both sides we are going to start if you could please use your phones to access
00:03:17.300 the QR code and then log your vote either for or against Alberta
00:03:22.240 independence and then at the end of the debates we'll have you vote again and
00:03:26.200 we'll see if anybody's vote was swayed I of course am Tristan Hopper reporter
00:03:31.180 columnist with the national post and i'm not an albertan so that's why they brought me in here
00:03:36.380 to moderate this particular debate so we'll start by introducing um our panelists uh first of all
00:03:43.180 for the leave side we have bruce party he is a law professor at queen's university executive
00:03:49.420 director of rights probe he drafted a 13 provision model constitution for an independent alberta and
00:03:56.220 and he's consistently one of the handsomest advocates
00:03:59.940 for Alberta independence.
00:04:03.000 The second handsomest advocate for Alberta independence,
00:04:06.760 Derek Fildebrandt, president and publisher and CEO
00:04:10.060 of the Western Standard, former Wildrose and UCPL MLA,
00:04:13.960 former Alberta director
00:04:15.080 of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation.
00:04:18.000 Representing the remain side, we have Jason Kenney.
00:04:21.060 He was premier of Alberta from 2019 to 2022,
00:04:24.640 senior Harper-era cabinet minister and he co-chairs the Business Campaign Against
00:04:29.920 Separation with Rachel Notley and as part of Vote to Stay and Elan Harper, Conservative Party
00:04:36.720 of Canada nominee in Calgary Confederation, leads the Canadian corporate tax practice at a national
00:04:42.320 accounting firm. So we're going to start off with our opening statements. These will be limited to
00:04:48.160 four minutes and we'll be beginning with you Mr. Party. Opening statement for four minutes please.
00:04:54.640 this debate is not about independence independence is not on the ballot not yet but do you know what
00:05:09.460 is on the ballot. The status quo. Notley, Nenshi, Kearney, Tenney, Paliyev, Harper,
00:05:29.900 Smith. That's the team along with the academics, legacy media, CBC, Globe and
00:05:42.980 Mail, the unions, the aboriginal chiefs, some CEOs of some big companies. This is
00:05:56.120 is the political establishment.
00:06:00.240 They do not want you to vote for option two.
00:06:06.520 That's not because option two is a threat to your interests.
00:06:13.160 It's because it is a threat to theirs.
00:06:20.600 You've been promised change for decades.
00:06:26.020 The firewall letter, the West wants in, the Triple E Senate, the equalization referendum.
00:06:34.340 Stephen Harper and Jason Kenney had nine years.
00:06:41.940 What's the plan now?
00:06:45.940 What's the plan to fundamentally reform the model of this country?
00:06:53.460 There is no plan.
00:06:54.340 the plan is more of the same the plan is trust us the plan is lead not leave there is no plan
00:07:06.720 i'm from ontario it's not my place to tell alberta what to do in its own referendum
00:07:14.580 But, I can tell you that outside Alberta, the only question that matters is question 10.
00:07:27.980 Option 1 on question 10 means that everything is fine.
00:07:37.660 Alberta is happy.
00:07:38.660 those complaints that you may have made in the past
00:07:43.440 don't worry about it
00:07:45.800 it's all good
00:07:48.740 Alberta is a resource colony
00:07:54.940 of the Laurentian Empire
00:07:57.320 it always has been 0.97
00:08:00.600 the Laurentians need your money
00:08:04.700 they do not need your votes if you pledge to stay in Canada your fate is
00:08:17.120 sealed your leverage is gone you will have embraced the status quo loyalty is
00:08:25.640 reciprocal if you are loyal to your country but your country disregards you
00:08:34.160 and your interests. You are not a patriot. You are a patsy. On Monday, you have a
00:08:45.980 chance to change the game. Do not throw it away.
00:08:54.760 Ms. Harper, we'll have your four-minute opening statement, please.
00:09:04.140 Thank you. Let me begin with something on which I suspect there is considerable agreement.
00:09:10.920 Alberta has legitimate grievances with Confederation, and Western alienation is real.
00:09:18.960 Albertans have argued with federal governments for decades about energy
00:09:23.580 policy equalization federal spending power and respect for provincial
00:09:29.080 jurisdictions many of those concerns are well founded but recognizing that there
00:09:35.460 is a problem does not tell us what the solution should be we need to be clear
00:09:42.780 between what can be changed by changing federal policy what Alberta can do using
00:09:48.920 the powers it already has and potentially even constitutional change
00:09:53.900 before we consider separation. When Stephen Harper became Prime Minister in
00:10:00.620 2006, his government took a different approach to federalism. Greater respect
00:10:07.040 for provincial jurisdiction, greater restraint in the use of the federal
00:10:12.020 spending power. The problems Alberta faces today are not the same as those
00:10:17.180 faced 20 years ago, the country, the economy, and the challenges have changed, but the underlying
00:10:23.360 point remains the same. Governments matter. Environmental assessment can change, federal
00:10:31.380 tax and regulatory policy can change, the way Ottawa uses its spending power can change. The
00:10:39.560 previous Conservative government operated precisely under precisely the same constitution we have
00:10:45.860 today, but it made very different choices. My friends on the other side may
00:10:52.220 say that because those choices didn't last, Canada can't be fixed. I actually
00:10:57.980 think it proves something rather different. A different government can
00:11:02.000 make different choices with different outcomes. Additionally, Alberta has
00:11:06.800 considerable room to act. The Alberta firewall proposals included a provincial
00:11:11.720 Pension Plan, Provincial Policing, Provincial Tax Administration, one can
00:11:16.100 agree or disagree with those specific proposals, but they make an important
00:11:20.900 point. There is considerable room for provinces to assert themselves within
00:11:25.640 Confederation. There may even be reforms that Alberta, excuse me, decides they want
00:11:31.700 to pursue that require constitutional change. That's more difficult, but
00:11:36.740 difficult is not the same as impossible. So before changing the borders of the
00:11:42.800 country, we should be precise about what problems we are solving for, for which no
00:11:49.100 other remedy exists, and which would actually require us to take the drastic
00:11:55.920 step of changing our borders. And to be clear, a referendum, as I think Bruce has
00:12:02.100 said, does not make Alberta independent. A clear expression of support for
00:12:06.720 secession on a clear question can begin the process of negotiation, but it does
00:12:12.100 not determine the outcome. Debts, assets, borders, Indigenous and treaty rights,
00:12:18.060 these terms would all have to be addressed. I want to be crystal clear
00:12:22.620 today. I am not defending the status quo. Alberta should insist on respect for
00:12:30.100 provincial jurisdiction, exercise the powers it already possesses, and make the case for reform
00:12:35.880 where reform is required. Alberta should insist, we have done so before. Alberta fought for control
00:12:43.700 of its natural resources. It fought Ottawa over energy policy. Western alienation produced a
00:12:50.640 political movement that became the official opposition, and ultimately helped to produce
00:12:57.100 a strong national government. Canada is not simply a constitutional relationship and Alberta has
00:13:06.540 played a major role in helping to build this country. Generations of Albertans have built
00:13:11.720 businesses, raised families, developed resources that helped power the Canadian economy and serve
00:13:16.700 this country in uniform. Alberta has spent a century arguing with Ottawa and I am not prepared
00:13:23.300 to concede the argument yet.
00:13:34.460 Format of opening statement from Mr. Philzabranza.
00:13:37.840 Quebec's heart is for independence, but her head tells her that she must remain in Canada.
00:13:43.820 Alberta's head knows that we can be independent, but Alberta's heart is still very much Canadian.
00:13:50.560 Most of you have already heard most of the economic and fiscal and constitutional arguments for independence,
00:13:57.300 and so I won't dwell on them too much here.
00:13:59.940 It is in our hearts where the debate on independence hurts us the most.
00:14:05.140 My earliest ancestors in Canada came here more than 300 years ago.
00:14:08.900 They conquered, settled, and built one of the world's great nations.
00:14:14.040 But that nation is gone.
00:14:16.060 that nation is infected by a self-loathing suicidal empathy that
00:14:21.460 plagues most Western nations. But unlike the United States, the United Kingdom,
00:14:26.240 France or Germany, there is precious little light at the end of the tunnel
00:14:30.880 that gives us hope that Canada has the willpower to save itself. Only regionally
00:14:36.680 concentrated pockets in Alberta, Saskatchewan, Quebec, interior BC and
00:14:41.060 rural Ontario have any sense of nationhood left that they are willing to
00:14:45.000 fight for most of the rest of Canada has consigned itself to die comfortably as a
00:14:51.960 globalized multicultural fiscal transfer zone nations are the greatest possible
00:14:57.240 expression of an extended family they have ties of kinship language faith
00:15:02.340 tradition history culture and heritage what ties do we now have left with much
00:15:10.720 of the rest of Canada. Those parts of Canada that have not already seen its
00:15:15.440 population replaced have seen a critical mass of the Canadian population
00:15:19.840 repudiate what makes them Canadian. They tear down the statues of our founding
00:15:24.580 fathers. They acquiesced to the lowering of the maple leaf in self-flagellating
00:15:28.960 shame for months to atone for a genocide that we know was a hoax. They opened the
00:15:34.460 floodgates of third-world mass migration that is destroying the inheritance 1.00
00:15:38.200 passed on to us by our ancestors. 0.98
00:15:41.240 And they call us racist when we oppose it. 0.76
00:15:43.980 They cheered the use of emergency war powers
00:15:46.380 to violently and unconstitutionally crush a peaceful protest
00:15:49.960 of flag-waving Canadians, many of them Albertans,
00:15:53.160 that were sick of having their freedoms crushed 0.57
00:15:54.920 on the altar of COVID hysteria.
00:15:57.460 They were ashamed of the Canadian flag
00:15:59.760 until we raised Alberta's blue shield in defiance.
00:16:03.360 And now they have the temerity to call us unpatriotic,
00:16:07.640 for wanting to save our part of Canada.
00:16:10.960 That description of self-hating post-national global citizens
00:16:14.980 surely does not fit fairly the description
00:16:17.940 described the Federalists that are in this room
00:16:20.920 or my debating partners on this stage.
00:16:23.240 But it does make up a very large portion
00:16:25.520 of the Federalist campaign here in Alberta,
00:16:27.780 and it makes up much of the electorate and governing class
00:16:31.220 outside of Alberta and a few other like-minded pockets.
00:16:35.140 All that we are left with is a post-national state whose primary function is the transfer of wealth between peoples and provinces.
00:16:43.440 The Canada that you love, united by kinship, language, faith, tradition, history, culture, and heritage, is gone.
00:16:52.320 And if you search your hearts, you will know that it is not coming back.
00:16:58.660 We are trying to save our part of Canada by declaring that our portion of it is proud of its inheritance
00:17:04.900 and is willing to fight to hand it to our posterity stronger than we found it.
00:17:18.360 Four-minute opening statement from Mr. Kinney.
00:17:20.960 Well, Derek and I agree on at least one thing, which is that man liveth not by bread alone.
00:17:25.640 too often this debate seems to regard a country as nothing more than a balance sheet, a set of
00:17:33.780 fiscal transfers. When I as a Canadian and a Conservative know that the first virtue as a
00:17:39.940 Conservative is the love of country, it is patriotism, and that a country is so much more
00:17:46.480 than simply an economic unit. It is a series of intertwined mutual obligations and loyalties,
00:17:54.980 not just to each other but to previous and to future generations and I maintain
00:18:00.920 that we have no right to rupture those obligations to the past and to the
00:18:06.960 future political theorists from the left to the right would say the only
00:18:10.740 conditions in which rupturing a country could be justified would be in serious
00:18:17.360 sustained conditions of violent tyranny and those who use that kind of language
00:18:22.920 on the separatist side of this debate, I think, are engaged in reckless demagoguery.
00:18:28.380 I saw my friend Ted Morton read a column the other day saying that we have to vote yes
00:18:33.060 to option two to send a message that we won't accept how we've been treated for the last
00:18:37.740 50 years.
00:18:38.300 Let me tell you what's happened to Alberta in the last 50 years.
00:18:40.840 We've gone from a population of 1.4 million to 5 million, the vast majority of whom were
00:18:46.140 other Canadians who joined us here, making us the most Canadian of provinces.
00:18:50.300 Why?
00:18:50.800 Because this is the land of opportunity.
00:18:52.440 They wanted to join that opportunity society.
00:18:55.500 We've seen our GDP grow five and a half-fold in real terms, from $65 to $360 billion.
00:19:01.820 We've seen our per capita GDP more than double in real terms.
00:19:05.620 And our oil production, yes, increased from 1.3 to 5.2 million barrels a day.
00:19:12.380 If that's losing, well, I'd like to see winning, because it seems to me that's enormous progress.
00:19:18.440 Of course, we have legitimate grounds recently and historically for alienation, legitimate grievances.
00:19:28.400 You know what we've done about those?
00:19:29.980 We didn't turn in on ourselves and become a culture of whiners and complainers.
00:19:34.180 Nothing could be less Albertan than that.
00:19:37.040 We fought for our interests.
00:19:38.540 We fought for the Federation.
00:19:40.580 We found allies.
00:19:41.880 We made our case.
00:19:42.900 We were persuasive.
00:19:43.740 And again and again, we won. Premier Brownlee won with the Natural Resource Transfer Agreement in 1933.
00:19:50.660 When we ran into eastern banks for closing on our farmers, Alberta had a government, Preston Manning's dad, who created our own bank.
00:19:59.680 When Peter Lougheed faced the National Energy Program, he created allies across the Federation, used our leverage,
00:20:06.440 and in 1982, secured Section 92.1A of the Constitution, Exclusive Provincial Control Over Resources.
00:20:13.740 We developed our own oil sands against those who said it wasn't possible.
00:20:19.980 And, yes, a Liberal government, Jean Kretchen, had sent it and approved those projects
00:20:23.740 that led to a more than doubling of our oil production.
00:20:26.960 We wanted free trade, and we helped to elect a Mulroney government that gave it to us.
00:20:31.020 Prime Minister Harper ended the Wheat Board monopoly,
00:20:34.880 appointed elected Alberta senators, eliminated the Long Gun Registry,
00:20:39.040 brought in deregulation for major projects.
00:20:42.060 When I was Premier dealing with the problem of Prime Minister Trudeau,
00:20:46.580 we found allies, eight other provinces, to sue the Feds over Bill C-69,
00:20:51.760 and we won at the Supreme Court.
00:20:53.300 We won on the plastics ban, and we won on the Emergencies Act.
00:20:57.080 And now the Premier is winning on the West Coast Pipeline,
00:21:00.300 the repeal of 80% of Trudeau's laws.
00:21:03.700 And we have a positive relationship with First Nations in this province
00:21:07.700 that could be turned on its head.
00:21:09.260 And we may be two weeks away from a conservative, low-resourced B.C. government that will open up new opportunities.
00:21:16.340 All of that is momentum.
00:21:18.220 Instead of making the decision for a huge rupture, an enormous risk that will throw us into years of uncertainty, investor uncertainty, the outflow of capital, of people, half of Albertans who say they would leave if this province votes to separate,
00:21:31.620 First Nations going from productive relationships to potentially 47 Ocas across the country.
00:21:37.500 I say, let's lead and not lead. 0.99
00:21:48.080 This next section is our moderated exchanges.
00:21:50.800 This will take the form of one-minute questions to individual panelists,
00:21:54.620 followed by a 30-second rebuttal from the other side.
00:21:57.800 We will start with Mr. Partey.
00:22:00.160 The Supreme Court says there is no unilateral right to cede.
00:22:04.280 If Ottawa refuses the terms of Alberta independence, what is the next plan?
00:22:10.240 One minute, please.
00:22:11.740 The Supreme Court says there is no unilateral right to secede.
00:22:16.200 And it also says there is no unilateral right to stop it.
00:22:22.720 Here is the story from the Supreme Court.
00:22:25.040 You pass a referendum on independence on a clear question with a clear majority.
00:22:29.460 You then have a mandate to negotiate your departure.
00:22:34.280 And the Government of Canada has an obligation to negotiate your departure, all in good faith.
00:22:43.480 So the key is the referendum.
00:22:45.320 Now, if, as the question suggests, the Government of Canada refuses to allow you to leave, that's not functioning in good faith.
00:23:00.060 And therefore, all bets are off.
00:23:02.460 And at that stage, and only at that stage, can you make a unilateral declaration of independence?
00:23:13.340 And the 30-second rebuttal, please.
00:23:16.060 Well, we would be thrown into just massive chaos and uncertainty.
00:23:20.700 Just one point.
00:23:21.520 First Nations absolutely have been clear that they will refuse to have their counterparty in their treaties from the 1870s
00:23:31.620 reassigned from Canada to Alberta. Right now we cannot develop our
00:23:37.300 resources or function our economy without the cooperation of First
00:23:40.980 Nations and if instead we turn that into a period of extended conflict after
00:23:47.280 this first vote it would be catastrophic for investor confidence for our economy
00:23:51.660 just on that one point alone. Mr. Phil de Brown, if the Leave side loses 70 to
00:23:59.040 30. Has not the leverage argument just been tested and failed? One minute, please.
00:24:06.040 Well, I might surprise some in that I at least somewhat agree with statements I know my opponents
00:24:13.440 here have made in the past that this referendum should not be used as a leverage argument.
00:24:19.040 I don't believe you. You know, I grew up shooting from a young age. You don't point a gun at
00:24:23.840 something unless you intend to shoot it and i think that is applicable here too and i do believe
00:24:29.820 to its credit the people who have put forward the referendum and the citizen initiative that's why
00:24:34.920 they had a clear question we don't have a clear question now and there's reasons we got to this
00:24:39.440 point if this does become a point of leverage it depends on how we play it i think that with all
00:24:47.460 due respect to the premier she made a terrible mistake in scheduling the constitutional reform
00:24:52.460 questions at the same time as an independence referendum those should have been had right now
00:24:59.900 and then an independence vote should have been scheduled six months after give people a chance
00:25:04.700 to vote on reform and put it to our other fellow canadians to see if they pick us up on it and if
00:25:09.180 not then we should have voted on it we've we've done it passed backwards and the 30 second rebuttal
00:25:15.820 Look, so if the vote of Alberta is that we choose to remain, which I hope it will be, I think there's still a strong message that will have been sent by the folks who chose to vote to leave.
00:25:30.160 I think a remain vote should be understood narrowly.
00:25:34.640 Albertans will have chosen to remain in Canada, but this should not be interpreted as an endorsement of the status quo.
00:25:42.580 this question is to no specific member of the leaf side treaties six seven and eight cover
00:25:51.380 nearly all of alberta how would an independent alberta deal with first nations who say they are
00:25:57.480 staying with the crown one minute please well that is up to the powers that be in alberta at the time
00:26:06.020 it depends upon what kind of country the people of alberta decide to have but let me make the
00:26:10.760 constitutional point about the new Alberta, and this is again in accordance with what the Supreme
00:26:15.840 Court has said. Independence is a repudiation of the existing constitutional order, and in your
00:26:24.280 negotiations on your departure, there will be no conclusions predetermined by law on any issue,
00:26:33.680 any issue. The existing treaties are part of the existing constitutional order in Canada.
00:26:40.220 Now, Alberta can choose to do what it thinks is best for the future country.
00:26:47.140 But these things are not predetermined by law, by the Constitution, or by the Supreme Court.
00:26:53.700 The Supreme Court is very clear about this.
00:26:56.300 If you are going to become independent, you are reputying the Canadian constitutional order,
00:27:02.220 you are turning the page, you have a blank slate,
00:27:05.180 you can determine for yourself what your new constitutional order is to be.
00:27:12.580 Send it over to 32nd Fruber, Battle Police.
00:27:15.560 I've always appreciated Bruce's honesty on this.
00:27:18.280 His position is that it's a tabula rasa.
00:27:20.340 We start from ground zero.
00:27:21.680 The treaties expire. 0.97
00:27:24.000 And that's exactly why all 47 First Nations and 8 Métis communities 0.73
00:27:30.240 refuse to recognize this process. 0.94
00:27:33.500 If a punitive Republic of Alberta were to abrogate, were to be seen as imposing itself as the new counterparty in those treaties, or just abrogating the treaties, we would go from the essential relationships that we have that have allowed us to become the third largest oil producer in the world, and overnight that would be turned on its head.
00:27:55.580 We would have rail and roadblock days across the province that would be kryptonite for future investment.
00:28:01.060 I'll have to go to our next question to the Leave side.
00:28:03.500 it's not fair this is only a minute this is quite a question but what currency
00:28:07.220 pension plan and debt share would Alberta have on day one you have one
00:28:12.180 minute well as we all know if if there was a clear question with a clear
00:28:18.980 majority voting for it the Clarity Act process at least leads us into
00:28:23.240 negotiation and that would be you know we should be under no illusions that's
00:28:27.400 not easy that's not fast and it's messy but these would be negotiated Alberta
00:28:33.180 pension, Alberta should have a pension plan for an independent country or not
00:28:36.720 for God's sakes. We should have done this at least 20 years ago. The assets and
00:28:44.060 liabilities between pensions and debts, I mean let the Canadian forces keep you
00:28:50.040 know broken down tanks and planes. Most of the CF-18s were built before even I
00:28:53.280 was born, so you know there's some assets they can keep. These get negotiated debt.
00:28:57.960 We'll take our fair share based on per capita. I think that's probably one of
00:29:01.940 the easier ones to negotiate. The bigger question is if under, you know, we have a successful
00:29:09.860 referendum and Ottawa does not negotiate in good faith and that is where we would come to more
00:29:15.300 troubled waters about how we would divide this. But I do believe Alberta would have immense
00:29:19.860 leverage in these debates because Ottawa needs our money a hell of a lot more than we need theirs.
00:29:24.820 okay look I advise on large transactions I'm a tax advisor I can tell you that when I hear the
00:29:35.980 words we'll work out the details later that gives me a great deal of onions and rarely does that go
00:29:43.540 well I would suggest the same as potentially true here now and just to make the other point you know
00:29:49.120 so currency what are we going to use probably the Canadian dollar but we would then have no
00:29:54.340 say with the Bank of Canada. We would be at the mercy of another sovereign nation. I think
00:30:02.020 this leaves a lot to be desired, a lot of uncertainty.
00:30:11.020 One last nonspecific question to the Leaf side. How would you answer reports of separatist
00:30:15.840 contacts with operatives in the United States? One minute please.
00:30:21.900 not much to respond to. Unlike, you know, nationalist movements in other places around
00:30:28.220 the world, there's no clear hierarchy to Alberta's independence movement. Anyone who wants to
00:30:32.760 put up their hand and say, I'm a leader of it, can do it. And so if a few self-appointed
00:30:37.420 people go down and, you know, met with an intern who makes coffee to a, you know, to
00:30:44.420 a first-term congressman from Wisconsin, I think that's unfortunate. I don't think that's
00:30:51.520 in the interest of Alberta, I don't think it's in the interest of the independence movement.
00:30:56.040 But I think it is of zero consequence when someone who merely self-appoints themselves
00:31:01.680 a leader and might jump up and down for the cameras does something like that because they
00:31:05.620 have no authority to negotiate on behalf of Alberta or the independence movement.
00:31:10.400 Well, that begs one of the biggest questions.
00:31:14.740 Who does have that mandate?
00:31:16.100 These guys are seeking a mandate to negotiate the rupture of the country in a massively
00:31:21.280 complex multi-year negotiation with no leaders, with a bunch of warring micro-factions in the
00:31:27.920 separatist movement that can't agree even on their goals or their strategy. Who is it? Mitch
00:31:32.980 Sylvester is suddenly going to pop up as Premier of Alberta. We have a Federalist government,
00:31:37.520 one separatist MLA, apparently, and nobody with a mandate to negotiate. It would be utter chaos.
00:31:44.920 And I should also add on the last...
00:31:47.360 Actually, I'm going to have to catch you up there with you, because this question is for you.
00:31:53.460 Mr. Kenney, as Premier, you held a 2021 equalization referendum that won 62% and changed nothing.
00:32:01.040 Why should Albertans believe fix it from within this time?
00:32:05.640 I don't agree that it changed nothing.
00:32:06.960 It created a clear fact that Albertans wanted reform of the equalization program.
00:32:10.740 And I can tell you, while we didn't get a constitutional amendment around the table with the premiers, they were suddenly very focused on Alberta's interests, the premier of Quebec in particular.
00:32:21.100 And my effort, successful effort, to get eight other provinces, including Quebec, to support us in our traditional reference, our challenge of the C-69 No More Pipelines law,
00:32:30.720 was part of that context
00:32:32.760 where they wanted to have our back
00:32:34.960 and support Alberta
00:32:36.240 given the legitimate grievances we had
00:32:38.380 over fiscal federalism, including equalization.
00:32:42.420 30 seconds, my brother.
00:32:45.040 What happened is we won
00:32:46.340 in the Supreme Court of Canada
00:32:47.640 in the judicial challenge of C-69.
00:32:50.500 There's no plan.
00:32:53.620 There's no plan.
00:32:55.480 Remember,
00:32:56.620 power is never given.
00:32:59.600 It was always taken.
00:33:00.720 The Canadian Constitution is impossible to reform, impossible to amend on any controversial subject, except, ironically, the secession of a province.
00:33:17.240 Question to Ms. Harper.
00:33:19.620 What would a federal conservative government concretely change for Alberta that the Constitution doesn't block?
00:33:27.440 So many things.
00:33:28.640 Look, government matters. There is no need to use suspending power of the federal government as aggressively as liberals do and have.
00:33:39.380 There is nothing that dictates the precise design of federal regulatory and assessment regimes that can't be changed legislatively.
00:33:47.840 Even equalization is up for renewal. It's a five-year process. It's up for renewal in March of 2029.
00:33:56.880 There are significant changes. The concept of equalization is guaranteed in Section 32 of the Constitution, but how it's actually applied and enacted is not. And I would say, if you've been paying attention to what's happening in Quebec, the new Premier of Quebec was here some months ago, and he opened with the comment, Alberta, we don't want your money. I think that's an interesting point.
00:34:25.160 30 second rebuttal, please.
00:34:26.880 Albertans did vote to end equalization and it did establish a political fact of what Albertans think
00:34:35.380 and the same logic applies to an independence referendum but we have to ask ourselves if 62%
00:34:42.220 of Albertans voted for something eminently reasonable like removing equalization from
00:34:46.240 the constitution and we were met with crickets or derision how were we going to be met with any
00:34:52.360 other reforms. Mr. Pierre Polyev stood on this stage just hours ago, making the case to Albertans
00:34:59.200 to stay in Canada. And did he even mention the word equalization once? In the last campaign,
00:35:06.720 he stood on the status quo. There's a nonspecific question to the Remain side. If almost half of
00:35:14.600 UCP voters back leave, what do you say to them on the morning after? To respect democracy and to
00:35:21.820 understand that if people continue to push the separatist agenda, what
00:35:25.960 they're going to do is, perhaps for a generation, divide the conservative
00:35:29.880 movement here in its heartland in Alberta. The vast majority of traditional
00:35:34.540 conservative voters and mainstream Alberta voters do not want to end up
00:35:38.920 locked into a permanent political civil war, arguing with their neighbors, instead
00:35:44.020 of focusing on growing and building and moving forward. They don't want to stare
00:35:47.820 in the rearview mirror. Look at the Calgary Shaw by-election, an area I used to
00:35:51.760 win 80% of the vote in, went to the New Democrats a month ago, in part because mainstream conservatives
00:35:58.140 have very little patience with this. And we now see the Liberals today would win half
00:36:03.540 of the federal seats in Alberta. So I would say to conservatives, if you want to strengthen
00:36:08.660 our voice, let's come together behind Mr. Polia, behind Premier Smith, and continue
00:36:14.340 to fight for a strong Alberta in the United Canada.
00:36:21.760 That Forever Canada, the largest federalist organization in this campaign, did not have to apply with election finance law is besides the point.
00:36:32.100 If the Remain side wins, the independent side has to respect that.
00:36:36.540 But like in any election where you lose, you are not required to disband your political party and never try again.
00:36:44.160 That means that independent supporters in the UCP have to accept that, and they have to accept working within the UCP if that's where they want to be.
00:36:50.960 but the federalist side of the UCP is in no position to expel independence supporters.
00:36:57.320 Unity for the UCP was hard fought, and it shouldn't be given away that easily.
00:37:05.660 One more nonspecific question to the Remain side.
00:37:09.000 Does a big Remain win help or hurt Alberta's leverage on equalization, pipelines, and the emissions cap?
00:37:17.400 One minute, please.
00:37:17.980 But this seems to be one of the major arguments for the Leave side, that we need the leverage, just vote for the leverage. And I reject that argument. Alberta is a major part of the economic strength of this country. We're 5 million people and we have substantial constitutional jurisdiction on our own. As many of the, as Jason has referred to, we've won a number of important court cases that changed the country.
00:37:44.340 I do not think that if we vote to remain, that that in any way hurts our leverage.
00:37:50.640 And in fact, it potentially makes it stronger, because we'll receive more investment and more prosperity in this province.
00:37:59.480 What leverage have you had over pipelines the past few months?
00:38:04.460 It is the upcoming vote on Monday.
00:38:08.000 Once that vote is done, and if LEAD wins, that leverage will be gone.
00:38:13.280 What leverage do you have over equalization?
00:38:17.660 Nothing.
00:38:19.340 If you vote to stay in Canada, any imaginings of any leverage you have over any of these things is gone.
00:38:29.700 These questions are to both sides, so I'll ask them to one side,
00:38:34.500 and there'll be a one-minute response, followed by the identical response from the other side.
00:38:39.440 The question, which I'm going to ask first to the leave side,
00:38:42.440 If Remain wins, should the Alberta pension plan and a provincial police force still go ahead?
00:38:49.440 Can I jump in?
00:38:51.440 I'll ask it to you afterwards.
00:38:53.440 Okay, sorry. I wasn't sure who that was going to.
00:38:57.440 Oh, everybody gets to answer this. One minute, please.
00:39:00.440 Bruce.
00:39:01.440 Oh, sorry.
00:39:03.440 Well, the short answer is yes. Why wouldn't you do that?
00:39:08.440 Is this something you should have done long ago?
00:39:10.440 what have you been waiting for this has nothing to do with the question of
00:39:15.560 independence this has something to do with what you are as a province you have
00:39:19.800 the provincial jurisdiction to do this why haven't you and if you do it you'll
00:39:24.960 be further along the way more prepared to dive back into the question of
00:39:29.880 whether or not you ought to leave but right now to some extent you are
00:39:34.920 handcuffed by the fact you have not made use of the full range of provincial
00:39:40.420 powers that you already have. The first five questions on this referendum are on questions
00:39:47.440 about powers you already have. You should exercise them. You should take a page out of Quebec's book
00:39:55.000 and go to town. And don't wait for permission. Stop the practice of waiting for permission to do
00:40:02.420 of things. Here's an idea. Perhaps try to be less Canadian.
00:40:11.420 Mr. Prudy?
00:40:16.420 Exact same question to the Remain side. If Remain wins, should the Alberta
00:40:20.420 Prevention Plan and the Provincial Police Force still go ahead one minute?
00:40:23.420 Well, I was going to say ditto, except the last sentence. Bruce is absolutely right.
00:40:26.420 Why are we talking about this radical divisive, massively risky prospect of tearing the country apart when we haven't even begun to exercise the full range of our constitutional powers? He's absolutely right.
00:40:40.420 By the way, coming out of the Fair Deal panel, we began the work on assessing the viability of a provincial police and pension plan.
00:40:48.420 And I believe that a pension plan would be the single, the Alberta pension plan would be the single biggest fiscal win that this province could make.
00:40:57.320 But those should be on the ballot right now.
00:41:00.820 But you know why they're not?
00:41:02.160 Because all the polls indicate that large majorities of Albertans are opposed to both ideas.
00:41:07.400 So why do you think they're actually going to accept the radical option of total rupture when Albertans still have not yet been persuaded about the prudence of developing our own constitutional powers, such as provincial police and pensions?
00:41:22.240 Let's do this the smart way, incrementally.
00:41:24.940 You need to persuade people on incremental progress and deepening our provincial autonomy.
00:41:31.780 I think we can, but it takes hard work.
00:41:36.100 Next question.
00:41:37.400 first to the leave side what margin settles this question for a generation
00:41:43.540 and what turnout makes it legitimate one minute please I would take a hundred
00:41:48.840 percent on one side or another to shut everyone up for all time you know it's
00:41:58.020 about the point I made earlier in every election at least one candidate loses in
00:42:02.640 canada that's often many candidates and we don't expect people to disband their political party
00:42:09.520 never run for office again and ride into the sunset but uh you know if the remain side has
00:42:16.000 a convincing victory the independent side uh owes it to the process whatever issues of fairness there
00:42:23.440 may have been uh what it owes it to the people of alberta to respect that decision and to reflect
00:42:31.920 on how to go forward and that does not mean another immediate referendum you would lose it
00:42:37.120 uh one of the great problems in the independence movement is it has not learned the lessons of
00:42:41.760 who talked about winning conditions uh winning conditions were not set up here we just did it
00:42:48.740 because we wanted to do it and and and get the puck in the net so if we don't do it uh the
00:42:55.100 independence movement needs to think long and hard about how it wants to proceed it needs to
00:42:59.080 think long and hard about who gets to be a leader and speak for the movement in the future.
00:43:07.300 Same question over to this side. What margins have with this question for a generation and
00:43:10.460 what turnout makes it legitimate? Look, I don't think anyone on this stage here today gets to
00:43:16.120 decide what that margin is. I think the people of Alberta will do that and I think we're hearing
00:43:21.360 fairly decisively through the polling that they're kind of done with this discussion. I think there's
00:43:28.160 strong will in Alberta for people to focus back on key issues that a provincial government should
00:43:35.060 focus on. Next question. This will actually be the final question. We haven't actually talked
00:43:42.860 about Quebec very much in this separatism debate. Question for the Leave side. Quebec has just
00:43:48.420 elected a large PQ caucus, Parti Québécois, or Parti Québécois, as it's said around here. Does
00:43:54.380 that make Alberta's hands stronger or weaker? I think, if anything, it makes it stronger
00:44:01.920 because it indicates that there is discontent about the Canadian model. There are more people
00:44:09.840 than just Albertans who don't want to be here. And it doesn't have a direct effect. It doesn't
00:44:15.040 mean that it should affect what Alberta does and what the timeline is and who gets there first. I
00:44:20.140 think it matters but here's the thing canada is in a lot of trouble it has become unhinged
00:44:29.820 and there are people around the country who understand that it is not fixable now how do
00:44:36.300 you fix something that's not fixable try taking it apart alberta should leave quebec should leave
00:44:45.020 start a cascade let the dominoes fall and we will see if in the face of an existential crisis
00:44:53.640 Canada has the ability to look itself in the mirror and face up to its foundational problems
00:44:59.600 maybe not even then but you can at least give that a try and see what happens
00:45:05.060 same question the remains on Quebec has just elected a large PQ caucus does that make Alberta
00:45:14.400 sound stronger or weaker? This was on the PQ, right? Yes. Yeah. Well, look, the PQ is not, there's not
00:45:22.240 going to be a referendum in Quebec. They won 28% of the vote. They don't have a majority. They don't
00:45:26.260 have a mandate to do this. And this is an interesting thing about Quebec politics. They
00:45:29.700 have a longstanding convention that no government will launch a referendum on something as divisive
00:45:34.780 and consequential as secession without a clear legislative mandate derived in an election. By
00:45:41.680 way one of the better things that happened in the quebec election was the election of my great
00:45:45.520 friend to finally break the kind of the monolithic left-wing dominance of quebec political discourse
00:45:53.280 and and how did he win those 19 seats part large part by saying he was going to fight against
00:45:58.400 a referendum uh and so i think we need to learn from that here in alberta which is to say uh that
00:46:05.280 if folks want to advocate for separation they're welcome to do so as citizens it's a free society
00:46:10.400 and they should do so in separatist parties guess what they've been doing that for 45 years on the
00:46:15.920 federal and provincial ballot in alberta getting on average less than two percent of the vote one
00:46:21.040 of those former leaders is on this stage under our closing statements and uh the first closing
00:46:28.880 statement for the remain side is mr kennedy again uh three minutes please i think the most important
00:46:36.480 thing that happens in this city every year is about to happen in the first week of November
00:46:41.720 when hundreds of volunteers from all political persuasions pound crosses into frozen soil along
00:46:49.980 Memorial Boulevard, 3,300 of them, to memorialize Canadians, southern Albertans who died in the
00:46:57.440 defense of Canada and who lie buried in foreign cemeteries underneath gravestones marked
00:47:06.060 with the Maple Leaf. We have an obligation to them. We have an obligation not to turn in on
00:47:13.780 ourselves in endless anger, bitterness, and recrimination, and divisiveness, not to create
00:47:20.940 a constant division in the society, but to be who we are as Albertans, doers, dreamers, builders,
00:47:27.960 moving forward, making friends, making the case. We now have super majorities in every province,
00:47:33.280 including Quebec and B.C., in support of increased oil and gas development pipelines.
00:47:38.400 We have a federal government that's repealed 80% of the bad Trudeau laws.
00:47:41.700 Are things perfect? No. They never will be. They are not in any country.
00:47:45.920 But we have built here in Alberta, despite the headwinds that we have faced,
00:47:49.560 despite the NEP and the underrepresentation in the Senate,
00:47:53.440 despite the legitimate grounds of Western alienation,
00:47:57.300 we have built by far the most prosperous part of Canada,
00:48:00.320 One of the most prosperous and successful societies in all of the world.
00:48:06.020 Why would we put that at risk by becoming a landlocked statelet?
00:48:10.640 By the way, there would be no negotiated settlement because the other provinces wouldn't agree to the constitutional amendments.
00:48:15.420 There would be a unilateral declaration of independence.
00:48:17.620 We lose automatic trade access to the rest of Canada, the rest of the world, the B.C. coast.
00:48:23.020 We end up in conflict with our First Nations.
00:48:25.340 We end up with costs of $80 to $150 billion.
00:48:28.240 dollars just when things are going in our direction i say let's build on this momentum
00:48:33.040 let's lean into it let's continue to make alliances across the federation
00:48:37.440 to be a strong alberta that is the leader of canada instead of turning in on ourselves
00:48:43.360 for the leave side your closing statement mr filter in Canada is a country worth saving we
00:48:59.300 all here agree with this the pertinent question is can Canada be saved on that I am decidedly 0.61
00:49:06.460 more pessimistic one in four people in Canada is foreign-born a proportion that we could not
00:49:12.280 possibly assimilate. Canada's total government debt is 3.4 trillion dollars 0.96
00:49:19.160 and growing daily. That is a hundred and nine percent of GDP. Canadians now earn
00:49:25.240 sixty-two cents for every dollar that Americans make. Alberta has six times
00:49:29.800 Nova Scotia's population but only three
00:49:34.640 and a half times as many MPs and half as many senators. We have proven incapable
00:49:41.200 of building great things for more than a decade and i count myself skeptical that the former u.n
00:49:46.000 special envoy for climate change and finance is going to change that have we all been so brow
00:49:53.040 beaten that our only benchmark for greatness is building another pipeline this is the measure of
00:49:59.840 our success as a people alberta sends 19 billion dollars more to ottawa than it receives back every
00:50:05.840 year what happened to demanding fairness and equalization 62 percent of albertans voted for
00:50:12.320 a constitutional amendment to remove it from the constitution in 2021 and what was the response
00:50:18.160 from ottawa and the other provinces silence at best even our federal conservative representatives
00:50:25.760 in alberta promise the status quo from many quarters the response was disdainful derision
00:50:33.600 And so what do we expect the response to be if Albertans vote for the four constitutional amendments in Monday's referendum?
00:50:41.080 Do we seriously expect Ottawa and the provinces to take us up in good faith to reform the Constitution?
00:50:48.620 No. Because the status quo works too well for too many of them.
00:50:53.440 no because too many people see Canada not as a nation of people but as a
00:51:01.540 multicultural fiscal transfer zone where the job of the federal government is
00:51:06.400 merely to move money from one kind of voter to another the difficulty of
00:51:11.080 Alberta achieving independence is admittedly great but the chances of
00:51:15.880 Canada significantly reforming itself are even smaller left-wing federalists
00:51:21.760 are clear alberta should stay and alberta should shut up conservative federalists tell us that
00:51:27.360 alberta should stay and get to work fixing canada but haven't we been doing that the whole time
00:51:34.320 haven't we been doing that since every election since the 1950s
00:51:40.720 conservative federalists need to answer one simple but important question how realistic
00:51:44.960 is it that we can reform the canadian constitution and restore canadian nationhood albertans must
00:51:52.800 honestly ask themselves does there exist enough genuinely nationalist canadians in other parts
00:51:59.120 of canada that would take up the call i wish it were so the reality is we are on our own
00:52:08.320 strong people do not grovel for crumbs for the master's table they take what's theirs i choose
00:52:14.080 not to be a colony of ottawa not of washington or of brampton i choose the remain a people
00:52:18.400 they'll be here for another 300 years closing statement for the remain side ms harper three
00:52:31.200 minutes please thank you folks i think we can all agree that alberta has legitimate grievances
00:52:36.880 what we disagree on is about the conclusion that that leads us to. My
00:52:43.420 friends on the other side look at those grievances and conclude that Canada
00:52:48.040 can't change. I would suggest that history has shown us that that's not
00:52:53.880 true. I understand their frustration but I do not accept their conclusion. The
00:52:59.620 proposition tonight isn't whether Alberta could be an independent country, of
00:53:05.020 of course it could. The question is would Albertans be better off if it was?
00:53:12.840 Separation would leave some of the most important questions affecting our future
00:53:17.640 to negotiation. The uncertainty we would be left with is tremendous. But ultimately
00:53:25.520 this debate is about the future we want to build for Albertans. It's about
00:53:31.700 creating opportunity so our children can build their futures here. It's about young people being
00:53:38.760 able to find good jobs, afford to buy a house, and build their lives here. It's about building an
00:53:46.300 economy that is strong enough to take care of our most vulnerable Albertans. National unity requires
00:53:55.680 more than slogans from the federal government. Canada must give Albertans
00:54:01.440 reasons to believe the Confederation works for them and Alberta should insist
00:54:06.280 on it. We are more than 5 million people. We produce the overwhelming majority of
00:54:11.640 Canada's oil and our economy matters enormously to this country. Alberta does
00:54:18.920 not come to Confederation hat in hand asking for favors. We come with interests
00:54:25.440 that Canada simply cannot ignore.
00:54:28.420 So insist that Ottawa respect provincial jurisdiction.
00:54:32.340 Insist that we get major projects built and our resources to world markets.
00:54:37.000 Insist that the provinces are given the fiscal capacity
00:54:40.720 to meet their constitutional responsibilities.
00:54:45.160 When Ottawa gets it wrong, challenge it.
00:54:48.100 When Alberta can act for itself, act.
00:54:52.220 And when Canada needs to change, make the case for change.
00:54:57.420 Because what matters isn't winning another argument with Ottawa.
00:55:02.460 It's what we leave for the generations who will follow us.
00:55:07.460 A strong Alberta, opportunity for our children, good jobs for our young people,
00:55:12.580 and a society that takes care of those who need it.
00:55:15.460 folks there is plenty in this country worth fighting to change and there is
00:55:23.460 plenty in this country worth fighting to keep I hope that we will do so
00:55:30.720 Final closing statement from the leave sign, Mr. Partey please.
00:55:45.480 In your hearts, there is a candidate that you know and love.
00:55:53.000 true north strong and free a land of opportunity a fair country wise leaders
00:56:00.980 sound institutions and people who hold the same values as you that Canada does
00:56:13.040 not exist it is a figment of our memory and our wishful thinking maybe once
00:56:24.580 Canada was a free and noble country maybe today it functions as a cartel
00:56:37.440 held together by bribes our leaders collaborate with foreign powers and global institutions
00:56:46.400 to plunder what remains of this country's prosperity our institutions have become unhinged
00:56:54.880 they have decided that the problem is you
00:56:58.880 you. Canada cannot be fixed within the model under which it operates. The powerful people
00:57:08.300 will not allow it. Its constitution is impossible to amend on any controversial subject except,
00:57:17.320 as I mentioned, except for the secession of a province. Now, imagine that Alberta had
00:57:25.080 always been an independent country prosperous free entrepreneurial would you choose to join the
00:57:35.560 canada of today the the the collectivist woke overtaxed over regulated corrupt inefficient
00:57:45.960 authoritarian confused and delusional country that you see today of course the answer would be no
00:57:55.080 If you wouldn't join, then why would you promise to stay?
00:58:13.460 That concludes the debate, the sovereignty vote, and the path forward.
00:58:17.140 I'd like to thank our debaters, Bruce Party, Derek Fildebrandt, Jason Kenney, and Ilan Harper.
00:58:22.260 now there will be a winner to this debates you have to scan in that QR code
00:58:27.180 and then these are monk debate style rules whoever moves the most votes from
00:58:32.700 the beginning does win the debate I don't know if we'll be able to calculate
00:58:35.520 that immediately and whether there's any kind of trophy my hearty thumbs up but
00:58:43.700 I've learned very much thank you all for coming
00:58:52.260 Thank you to our debaters, and I just ask that you remain in your seats as we will do a quick stage reset before our next panel.
00:59:22.260 the
00:59:52.260 Thank you.